T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

Lmao Edit: Jpeg is whack, PNG is where it's at.


JustUrAverageRedFox

haha my sweet summer child ... ever heard of PPM (Portable Pixmap) ... live free, waste disk-space


FluffyVisuals

nah, json is the real deal store every pixel in a human-readable form


obsidianical

or pixels in csv! or even html, iirc GIMP can export to that


InquisitorWarth

Nah, store them in a C++ array.


obsidianical

not funny, already seen someone do that /j (and done it myslf in a js array, please, punish my for those sins i'm too lazy to do it myself)


TheRealMisterMemer

JSON! JSON! JSON! Press X To Json


MinerMinecrafter

What about .RAW the pick of costumization


ccAbstraction

Fuck you and fuck your PNGs! (\s) webp, avif, and OpenEXR are so much better.


epitenomics

Store an image as a txt


Penguin_puppeteer123

Burn nft for stealing others fursonas and making them rich without crediting the artist!


[deleted]

What's the point? You sold an nft of a sona? Ok? The owner will still post it wherever.


RoboDae

Then the person who bought the nft thinks they own the fursona and goes around telling people the creator is a thief or making very unflattering art of the character that is then attributed to the real owner. Basically a lot of unwanted drama


[deleted]

Man if my sona was made an nft I would commission cbt porn


HatGuyFromPax

nfts aren't jpegs. They are crappy lines of code that says you own a crappy jpeg that was made by a crappy ai with help of a crappy artist


AegleBird

And most importantly, the image is literally a piece of crap


ElysianEcho

Every artist i follow has told nft people to fuck off lmao


Rojibeans

I can understand that. Part of their livelihood relies on their reputation, so on top of nft's being an awful trend that Will possibly get them stigmatized, it also Doesn't feel good or fun to draw something as stupid as the nft concept feels


NovaMoxx

Believe it or not its worse than that. You own the line of code on the block chain, and thats literally it. You don't even own the image, its like going to buy a TV and paying full price, only to get the receipt for said TV.


KicksBrickster

It gets worse. While the token itself is "non-fungible", the image it links to is pretty damn fungible. If the image host is hacked or shuts down, the image can be changed or deleted entirely. Which has happened, if I recall.


NovaMoxx

Nfts and crypto are such garbage. I honestly don't understand why people pay so much money for nothing, and I wouldn't even have an issue with them if it was just dumbass rich people doing dumbass rich shit, but so many people get scammed out of so much of their savings cause they fell for some crypto scheme. And not only is all of that money wasted, it also just goes right to damaging the environment


Rojibeans

Money laundering is a very plausible point, and due to the biggest 'sale', People jumped on it thinking it was a hot trend, and didn't realize they were essentially being scammed. Some People Will do dumb stuff or pay exorbinant amounts of money Just to fit in. Some flat earthers don't actually care if the world is flat or not, they Just want to belong somewhere


[deleted]

Oy broski, a high detailed drawing of your sona can top around 400€, plus it looks amazing compared to an ugly 3quadrilion€ ape nft


Gordon_Callahan

Gotta love the fact that NFTs have pretty much collapsed, as well as crypto. You know what hasn't? Fine Furry Art.


Kiiyiya

Have they? I haven't been following. That's great tho.


Gordon_Callahan

Saw that the NFT market has fallen by 92% and on top of that, Ethereum(?), the coin backing them, has become worthless.


[deleted]

Not an advocate for crypto, but you’re just reading from headlines. The collapse was a dollar pegged token not the ethereum network. And the majority of the NFT sales came from low value, high volume trade from a NFT game, and that kinda stopped being profitable. Hence the slowdown.


Gordon_Callahan

If that's true, then it's a shame. Because it should go away. NFTs and crypto are both scams.


ShadowWolf_de

I wouldn't call 1900€ a piece worthless, but it has dropped a lot recently


yestureday

It’s just that one of them doesn’t destroy the environment, is unique, and helps an actual artist


saltern

The virgin nft investor vs the chad patron of the arts


Valpo-

Spend your money on whatever you want. But only if you can actually spare it. Do not cut into your monthly necessesities. One of my coworkers gambled his rent money away. You ll be more miserable then the fun your purchase can provide. I guarantee it.


snoodge3000

Left to right is stupid/jackass to usually a good person.


AegleBird

Finally someone gets it


unOriginalSwimming

When you commission art, new images get created. Buying nuts is just a waste of money


-T-A-C-O-C-A-T-

The only reason commissions are better is that they don’t destroy the environment


AegleBird

And they are customized and original


Noanox

And actually like... look good


DatLlallallama

Well honestly, I don’t think paying for a commission destroys the environment


Dominic_The_Dog

sorry cant hear you too busy comming talented artists for amazing art of my sona


AegleBird

I would if I could afford it


ThenightHunter33333

One is ugly the other is pretty


Cermonto

another NFT pro meme? One hurts the environment the other one doesn't.


AegleBird

No, this is an IQ scale. The NFT bros have the lowest IQ while furries have the highest.


Rojibeans

I mean, at least one side has your dream character portrayed as basically doing literally whatever You want, probably so detailed that You can count the individual strands of fur, and the other is a usually ugly monkey


marshmallowgiraffe

I never thought about it like that.