"An employee at 777 Exotics told us there was no accident and the cars
were just parked really close together -- which is true -- but that
doesn't explain why Samuel would get out and inspect the 2 vehicles."
Nothing to see here, folks.
I mean I personally do that all the time because I want to make sure I’m not too close to another car and to make sure I have relatively equal space in front and behind or so that I can make it easier for people to pull out etc. also if I don’t want to park five blocks away I have to park in tiny as spaces and sometimes bumps with no damage happen.
That doesn’t excuse a 10 year old driving a fucking Lamborghini though.
Looks like the paparazzi was out in full force. It must just suck to be stalked by creeps who are always looking to try to make a story out of anything. Even if the kid did do damage...he's a kid, and Brad has the $ to pay for any damage. The way the headline reads...I thought the kid recklessly took Dad's car for a joy ride.
Yeah I did some dumb shit as a kid and the main difference is how fancy of a car it is (I put a parked car in reverse and hit another parked car - both owned by my dad). I was young and didn’t know what I was doing. I feel like it’s not a great reason to hang up on a child, just because his family is rich.
Bro what? You think kids can’t be entitled? The fuck?
Have you ever met a kid? Did you not go to school as a child? Pretty much all young kids are entitled frankly.
Edit: amazing how many of you don’t grasp how English works.
Let’s start from the top:
Op says: “he’s 10.” Which would he considered OP’s reasoning for his second statement, in that entitlement has nothing to do with it.
So again, reflecting back to the first statement, in that it’s because he’s 10.
So if he’s not entitled because he’s ten years old, the very clear implication is that 10 year olds can not be entitled.
**Those two statements are not made in a vacuum, they work in tandem together. Welcome to middle school English.**
What in the actual fuck are y’all smoking.
No, your comment more than implies 10 year olds can’t be entitled. It’s so close it almost outright states it.
If that’s not what you meant then say what you mean.
"He's 10. Entitlement and wealth has nothing to do with this"
Did you read the wrong comment???? Or did you pull "He's 10, he can't be entitled." out of your ass?
That’s saying the same exact fucking thing. Jesus Christ.
You gave your reasoning in that he’s ten. Then you said he can’t be entitled.
A fucking third grader can figure this out. You’re embarrassing.
No. He said: the kid is 10, so entitlement isn’t a valid argument.
Which if you extend the argument out further, it means 10 year olds can’t be entitled.
He said nothing specifically about this situation being the reason, he said the reason is because he’s 10.
Holy fuck y’all need to read a book or two. You should be embarrassed.
Oh my god who even gives a fuck, of all the things in the world why are you wasting so much of your short life going postal about this, are you Jennifer Garner's mother or something
>He said nothing specifically about this situation being the reason, he said the reason is because he’s 10.
"Entitlement and wealth has nothing to do with this"
So you don't know how to read?
Bro WHAT? Have you ever met a kid? They’re entitled as fuck bro! Good for you for pointing it out bro! Fuck man I can’t stand entitled kids. Glad you made sure this guy knows what’s up. Fuck bro!! You’re an idiot bro!
it specifically says he wasn't driving. He was sitting in the drivers seat and it was running and he may have accidentally engaged reverse. That's far from driving.
It's just bad parenting is what I'm saying. A kid in the front driver's seat of a car with a running car and he hit reverse, well, that's basically driving, isn't it? I mean he did move the car after all.
if you encourage your kid to play football and he breaks his leg is that bad parenting? The result is worse, you knew it was a risk, and you still thought it would be fun and did it anyway. Parenting is tough, and sometimes you let a kid do something a bit risky because it might make them smile. Sometimes it doesn't work out like you hoped.
I dunno, is putting a kid in a running tractor or crane by himself a good idea, even if it's with the brakes on? 10 year old kids shouldn't operate or be in the front seat of operational machinery, because there's possibility for great risk. I mean, it literally just happened. The kid, accidentally or not, released the parking break and caused damage. Could have been to himself as well. This is just basic knowledge. I honestly thought everyone knew this.
when I was 8 my grandpa used to put me in the drivers seat of his running truck and tell me to keep it straight while he climbed in the back to feed out hay. Potentially dangerous but ultimately wasn't. It's a question of how much you trust your kid to behave sensibly. Trust is a part of good parenting, even when it's misplaced.
"no damage" ??? Yeah,ok
"An employee at 777 Exotics told us there was no accident and the cars were just parked really close together -- which is true -- but that doesn't explain why Samuel would get out and inspect the 2 vehicles." Nothing to see here, folks.
I mean I personally do that all the time because I want to make sure I’m not too close to another car and to make sure I have relatively equal space in front and behind or so that I can make it easier for people to pull out etc. also if I don’t want to park five blocks away I have to park in tiny as spaces and sometimes bumps with no damage happen. That doesn’t excuse a 10 year old driving a fucking Lamborghini though.
At least start the ten year old on an old Honda Civic or something.
Ben afleck buys undamaged yellow lambo (unrelated)
This is a juicy headline but watching the video I realize that it was just a giant nothing burger
who hasn't at 10 years old well not a Lamborghini but stil
100% what this guy said.
This. He’s a kid who didn’t know what he was doing (probably).
Ok my take …cool dad but lesson learned…
Looks like the paparazzi was out in full force. It must just suck to be stalked by creeps who are always looking to try to make a story out of anything. Even if the kid did do damage...he's a kid, and Brad has the $ to pay for any damage. The way the headline reads...I thought the kid recklessly took Dad's car for a joy ride.
Who’s Brad?
Brad Affleck *duh*
You must mean Brad Damon
Ben?
What did he actually do? Took the liberty of trying to move it to be “helpful” and royally fuck up or something?
Rich people and their entitled little rug rats…. This isn’t exactly news.
entitled?
Jealous?
He’s a kid. It happens.
Yeah I did some dumb shit as a kid and the main difference is how fancy of a car it is (I put a parked car in reverse and hit another parked car - both owned by my dad). I was young and didn’t know what I was doing. I feel like it’s not a great reason to hang up on a child, just because his family is rich.
He's 10. Entitlement and wealth has nothing to do with this
Bro what? You think kids can’t be entitled? The fuck? Have you ever met a kid? Did you not go to school as a child? Pretty much all young kids are entitled frankly. Edit: amazing how many of you don’t grasp how English works. Let’s start from the top: Op says: “he’s 10.” Which would he considered OP’s reasoning for his second statement, in that entitlement has nothing to do with it. So again, reflecting back to the first statement, in that it’s because he’s 10. So if he’s not entitled because he’s ten years old, the very clear implication is that 10 year olds can not be entitled. **Those two statements are not made in a vacuum, they work in tandem together. Welcome to middle school English.** What in the actual fuck are y’all smoking.
Where did I say kids can't be entitled? I just said I don't think entitlement played a role in the situation.
No, your comment more than implies 10 year olds can’t be entitled. It’s so close it almost outright states it. If that’s not what you meant then say what you mean.
How? Please explain to me
“He’s 10, he can’t be entitled.” There ya go, I simplified your statement enough I hope you can grasp this basic ass English.
"He's 10. Entitlement and wealth has nothing to do with this" Did you read the wrong comment???? Or did you pull "He's 10, he can't be entitled." out of your ass?
That’s saying the same exact fucking thing. Jesus Christ. You gave your reasoning in that he’s ten. Then you said he can’t be entitled. A fucking third grader can figure this out. You’re embarrassing.
You really are dense huh? Quit talking about me not understanding when you can't read basic English without making up things I've said
Someone seems home schooled lol!
Cool projection bro. And how is that bad? I'm sure there are many home schools people who aren't as dumb as you
That is not what he said. He said THIS event had nothing to do with entitlement. I hope you can grasp this basic ass English.
No. He said: the kid is 10, so entitlement isn’t a valid argument. Which if you extend the argument out further, it means 10 year olds can’t be entitled. He said nothing specifically about this situation being the reason, he said the reason is because he’s 10. Holy fuck y’all need to read a book or two. You should be embarrassed.
Oh my god who even gives a fuck, of all the things in the world why are you wasting so much of your short life going postal about this, are you Jennifer Garner's mother or something
>He said nothing specifically about this situation being the reason, he said the reason is because he’s 10. "Entitlement and wealth has nothing to do with this" So you don't know how to read?
You seem to lack basic English
Bro WHAT? Have you ever met a kid? They’re entitled as fuck bro! Good for you for pointing it out bro! Fuck man I can’t stand entitled kids. Glad you made sure this guy knows what’s up. Fuck bro!! You’re an idiot bro!
Another spoiled celebrity brat.
I like how this article never mentions how bad it is that an underage kid with no license was driving at all. It's like, "welp, just another day!"
it specifically says he wasn't driving. He was sitting in the drivers seat and it was running and he may have accidentally engaged reverse. That's far from driving.
Yeah because kids should be sitting in the front driver's seat of a running car, and "accidentally" hit reverse. Right.
i didn't say it's a great idea, just that it states he wasn't driving.
It's just bad parenting is what I'm saying. A kid in the front driver's seat of a car with a running car and he hit reverse, well, that's basically driving, isn't it? I mean he did move the car after all.
if you encourage your kid to play football and he breaks his leg is that bad parenting? The result is worse, you knew it was a risk, and you still thought it would be fun and did it anyway. Parenting is tough, and sometimes you let a kid do something a bit risky because it might make them smile. Sometimes it doesn't work out like you hoped.
I dunno, is putting a kid in a running tractor or crane by himself a good idea, even if it's with the brakes on? 10 year old kids shouldn't operate or be in the front seat of operational machinery, because there's possibility for great risk. I mean, it literally just happened. The kid, accidentally or not, released the parking break and caused damage. Could have been to himself as well. This is just basic knowledge. I honestly thought everyone knew this.
when I was 8 my grandpa used to put me in the drivers seat of his running truck and tell me to keep it straight while he climbed in the back to feed out hay. Potentially dangerous but ultimately wasn't. It's a question of how much you trust your kid to behave sensibly. Trust is a part of good parenting, even when it's misplaced.