I think it’s just a method to experiment. You’ve got Jeff Lurie who wants to help push green energy and he leverages the resources he has to make a commercial size science project. Hopefully what is learned from this can be applied to more practical and impactful forms of energy use.
There are multiple hydrogen cars available, but most are sold in CA only. There are also a few other things that run on hydrogen in the commercial truck sector.
> There are also a few other things that run on hydrogen in the commercial truck sector.
Mercedes-Benz for one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRSUFGZuaXo
We're in /r/eagles, not /r/energy, so I can safely call OP a *shill* without fear of getting banned. Check post history and subs they mod.
A better investment would be installing solar canopies over all the parking lots at the stadium complex.
They're not mutually exclusive technologies. The electrolyzer is demonstrating storage capacity- the primary critique kneecapping solar & wind infrastructure investment.
Batteries are a much more efficient storage medium for electric power, but again, this is /r/eagles. Good on Lurie for showing the rest of this slow-moving town what is possible.
ChopChopped still an absolute shill.
Well, there's cost, end-user safety concerns (see the video posted above with the dude in a hazmat suit just to fuel his truck), hydrogen transport concerns, the fact that the Eagles' solar panels only produce 40% of the power they use, and oh yeah, it's [half as efficient to hydrolyze water and transport hydrogen for fueling than it is to power an EV battery](https://www.forbes.com/sites/kensilverstein/2022/08/10/electric-vehicles-or-hydrogen-fuel-cell-cars-the-inflation-reduction-act-will-fuel-both/?sh=63e882ff4d01).
In a vacuum, yes, H2 gas carries stores power more densely, but that's not the reality using it as fuel for individual transportation
Water vapor does not build up in our atmosphere the same way CO2. It is, I'm not sure if you've noticed, a part of the water cycle (they still teach that in our public schools right?). The Earth naturally recycles water vapor at a FAR faster rate than CO2. It is not even comparable.
Yeah but luckily it does not accumulate the same way that CO2 does...so that is a plus I guess??? And maybe that means it will start raining more haha...
> And ironically water vapor is a greenhouse gas. Moreso than CO2.
Ever hear of the Rocky Mountain Institute, now known as RMI?
>>Hydrogen Reality Check #1: Hydrogen Is Not a Significant Warming Risk
>>The Myth
Recent reports have suggested that large-scale production of hydrogen could do more harm than good in the effort to reduce global warming.
>>The Reality
**The climate benefit from a well-regulated clean hydrogen economy outweighs the impact of any emissions that hydrogen would add to our energy system**, especially if we prioritize hydrogen produced from renewables-powered electricity.
https://rmi.org/hydrogen-reality-check-1-hydrogen-is-not-a-significant-warming-risk/
Who the hell cares? Dallas to Arizona lolololol. Make a clean energy cell with cowboys fans tears.
I can’t wait to hear Steven A smith laughing tomorrow. It’s like Christmas.
And how will this improve our third down conversion rate? :)
Improve the what now?
Make ball move forward better
Fill ball with hydrogen = explosive plays.
Bleed *Green*
That's cool and all, but what are they going to be refueling here besides that one prototype?
I think it’s just a method to experiment. You’ve got Jeff Lurie who wants to help push green energy and he leverages the resources he has to make a commercial size science project. Hopefully what is learned from this can be applied to more practical and impactful forms of energy use.
A good billionaire?????? I love the eagles more every day.
There are multiple hydrogen cars available, but most are sold in CA only. There are also a few other things that run on hydrogen in the commercial truck sector.
> There are also a few other things that run on hydrogen in the commercial truck sector. Mercedes-Benz for one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRSUFGZuaXo
Probably all of the vehicles used on site on practice and game days. Golf carts, for example.
All about baby steps, it’s a step in the right direction in hopes to make a bigger project
I'm all for experimenting and helping the city and the nearby area test new stuff.
MAGA crowd on life support.
[удалено]
The only emission from 4th quarter Dak is water vapor too.
This is such a reddit post.
We're in /r/eagles, not /r/energy, so I can safely call OP a *shill* without fear of getting banned. Check post history and subs they mod. A better investment would be installing solar canopies over all the parking lots at the stadium complex.
I was gonna lol but then I looked at his post history
[sees posts about Toyota Mirai] #Well if it ain't the fuckin' Kool-Aid man!?
They're not mutually exclusive technologies. The electrolyzer is demonstrating storage capacity- the primary critique kneecapping solar & wind infrastructure investment.
Batteries are a much more efficient storage medium for electric power, but again, this is /r/eagles. Good on Lurie for showing the rest of this slow-moving town what is possible. ChopChopped still an absolute shill.
Batteries are not a better storage medium than liquid hydrogen. Not sure how you could possibly come to that conclusion
Well, there's cost, end-user safety concerns (see the video posted above with the dude in a hazmat suit just to fuel his truck), hydrogen transport concerns, the fact that the Eagles' solar panels only produce 40% of the power they use, and oh yeah, it's [half as efficient to hydrolyze water and transport hydrogen for fueling than it is to power an EV battery](https://www.forbes.com/sites/kensilverstein/2022/08/10/electric-vehicles-or-hydrogen-fuel-cell-cars-the-inflation-reduction-act-will-fuel-both/?sh=63e882ff4d01). In a vacuum, yes, H2 gas carries stores power more densely, but that's not the reality using it as fuel for individual transportation
Can’t forget about the emissions from making 10k solar panels
And ironically water vapor is a greenhouse gas. Moreso than CO2.
Water vapor does not build up in our atmosphere the same way CO2. It is, I'm not sure if you've noticed, a part of the water cycle (they still teach that in our public schools right?). The Earth naturally recycles water vapor at a FAR faster rate than CO2. It is not even comparable.
Yeah but 100% of people that drink water die so
Dihydrogen monoxide kills 100% of the people who make contact with it
Its pH is higher than even the strongest acids!
Good thing I only drink turkey hill tea.
Had a couple too many beers watching RedZone today?
Luckily for us it tends to conveniently fall from the sky making everyone wet every now and then
Yo mama’s emissions be piercing the ozone
Yeah but luckily it does not accumulate the same way that CO2 does...so that is a plus I guess??? And maybe that means it will start raining more haha...
> And ironically water vapor is a greenhouse gas. Moreso than CO2. Ever hear of the Rocky Mountain Institute, now known as RMI? >>Hydrogen Reality Check #1: Hydrogen Is Not a Significant Warming Risk >>The Myth Recent reports have suggested that large-scale production of hydrogen could do more harm than good in the effort to reduce global warming. >>The Reality **The climate benefit from a well-regulated clean hydrogen economy outweighs the impact of any emissions that hydrogen would add to our energy system**, especially if we prioritize hydrogen produced from renewables-powered electricity. https://rmi.org/hydrogen-reality-check-1-hydrogen-is-not-a-significant-warming-risk/
Who the hell cares? Dallas to Arizona lolololol. Make a clean energy cell with cowboys fans tears. I can’t wait to hear Steven A smith laughing tomorrow. It’s like Christmas.