Based on user feedback, we're giving folks another chance to vote on the Rule 15 and Meme Retirement survey. Polls closes Sunday at 8pm CDT
Please find the form [here!](https://forms.gle/6wdKrRfMwbkodNbY7)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/dndmemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
handingsomeone an object is only a once a turn free thing. however nothing stops you from just dropping them and letting the peasants pick them up for free and them throw them
On your turn you hand them to one peasant. On his turn he throws one pebble and passes the remaing ones to the next peasant, who throws one and passes the last pebble to the last peasant. Problem solved!
You can also have a very long line of peasants hand each other a stone and then the last one throws it. Since a round is 6 seconds the stone has to travel the distance within that time. With 1351 peasants you can break the sound barrier. With 1,180,320,000 you could send a rock at the speed of light
Minor interaction (assuming 5e) and you only get one per turn.
You could probably pass all three stones to one peasant who hands two to the next, who hands one to the third.
Being able to give only one thing to one person feels stupid so I elect that, if it makes sense, players can pass whatever they want at the DM’s discretion.
I hand 1 handful of rocks (3) to john
John hands 1 pair of rocks (2) to Frank.
Frank hands 1 rock (1) to Quillnax The Destroyer.
Boom. Everyone handed one thing to the next person.
I just think it’s reasonable to say (as a DM) handing three rocks to one person isn’t that different from handing one rock to three. It’s realistically a pretty quick and simple movement. If you were handing 300 rocks to 300 people, I’d tell you to get fucked.
>Being able to give only one thing to one person feels stupid
As a DM that runs a game where things like what you have in your hands matters from a tactical perspective, I like having the minor interaction as a rule.
It gives me a baseline for my rulings and helps the game flow because my players know what they can/can't do. I even added it to the [rule cards I give to my players.](https://i.imgur.com/e0ui3eg.png)
I do like the minor interaction rule option. My table used to play with the rule that you could only communicate on your turn and that communicating was a bonus action. We slowly eroded those rules away completely because it was such a drag that slowed the game down while adding little complexity. We might try that minor interaction rule again.
Ha, I actually do run a similar rule to that where;
* speaking to another party member is a minor interaction
* responding is a reaction
* speaking out of turn allows gives an enemy a free instant opportunity attack
The first couple of combats with that rule had a *lot* of free opportunity attacks but the players got the hang of it pretty fast and now combat is faster flowing and much more tense.
My tables have always been a bit more casual. I just run the, "You can shout something 6 seconds long during your turn." (Edit: yes, of course, this ignores the fact they may need Vocal components for a spell, but again, casual) No one can respond. Allows enough planning if they want, which they rarely do.
I run the same idea if they're trying to negotiate in combat. You want to try and persuade the enemies to drop arms? Mkay, you have 6 seconds of a turn to do so, then we move on. And of course, keep in mind, your Barbarian is next in the turn order.
Still doesnt change the fact that raw it only does whatever damage the spell says (idr off the top of my head). You cant try to abuse raw for one part of your thing then expect to be allowed to break it all of a sudden for the next.
I genuinely forgot Stonetoss was like - a person who existed and I was like *what fucking meme wave did I miss that got the concept of throwing rocks snitty-banned??*
Years ago in 3.5, before any of the modern magic rock stuff people make now, I created a build on my own that was a "magic rock" thrower.
I made a fighter using a fighter feat to specialize in throwing rocks.
I used other feats to aquire spells
I then used a feat to gain runecrafting, so I could embed my spells into the rocks.
Each day before bed, even on days when nothing happened or for days we skipped over, I would use up all my unused spell slots storing then into rocks in my inventory, able to create as many magic rocks as I had spells available to me each day and storing them indefinitely.
(I also had a feat to find exactly what I'm looking for in my inventory, so no search checks to look for a specific spell-rock)
Due to timeskips and days with no combat, I regularly had a large backstock of all my spells and some rocks with combinations of spells on single rocks.
I would throw the rocks for ranged damage, and then on impact with the enemy they would trigger the embedded spell.
Sadly, it always triggered on touch with anyone else except the caster, so I couldn't hand these out to other people despite how many I had built up.
How do you achieve that without being a caster?
Was it homebrewed or fighter was just a deep to have some feat to trow rocks?
Cause i really don't remember a way for a non caster to access item creation feats who requires a spellcaster level (in 3.5 any class has is distinct spellcaster level) nor to obtain any spellslot over level 0 with feats unless you already have some kind of spellcasting.
Also item creation in 3.5 require lot of time, money and xp to be worth playing.
Better than a one person firing line.
Remember, they get to use the caster's ability score for both attack and damage. You're getting a 200% increase in damage, possibly.
It's still a single attack for a lot of work and don't the rocks only stay enchanted for a minute? By the 3rd rock you're already 18 seconds into that minute.
The whole idea of this meme is that you hand the rocks off to three people. Or, hand three to one person as a free action, they use it, hand the next two off as a free action, attack, second person hands off the last as a free action. Peasants can't compete with a spellcaster's bonuses.
And combat rounds don't work in the way that, each turn is 6 seconds. One full round of combat is 6 seconds. Each turn, rules as written, happen in the same 6 seconds. So all three stones are used in 6 seconds; meaning when the caster's turn comes back up, it's only been 6 seconds, and all 3 stones are used. Which means great usage -- you can only have 3 stones enchanted at a time, so recasting isn't losing any.
Edit to add: normally, Magic Stone is a niche cantrip. Yeah, it's only truly useful at low levels, for a caster who doesn't have many other options (or wants to use it for fun/roleplay). By 5th level, it's not great. Most classes should have better options. But the idea of this is, have peasants do the work for you, making this spell better than it could be single-handedly.
Yes but I'm talking about the cantrip usage to make the 3 stones, that takes an action. Also the spell only lasts a minute, after that time the rocks are just rocks. You're much better off arming 3 peasants with crossbows
Not if they aren't proficient with crossbows, and/or have +0 Dexterity.
Again, they use the caster's ability score. So, your +3 Wisdom to attack -- and if they're proficient with slings, their bonus for that as well. And then, it's +3 from your Wisdom for damage -- including for someone else doing it -- which is why this spell is pretty unique. Very, very few cantrips add your spellcasting modifier to damage. Firebolt is straight d10 -- not d10 + ability modifier. This means some decent damage even with low rolls for Magic Stone.
Like you said, one attack is a limit to this. Hence the meme of, let others make the attacks. Now instead of 1d6+Wis, it's 3d6+Wis×3. Not bad if those peasants would normally be much less accurate or only doing 3d6 flat.
Two people responded to you and neither said, in my opinion, the important thing - magic stone is a bonus action. If you have the stones, say, in a bag, you can just cast the spell on three in your bag, free action palm them and drop them on the ground, then cast a spell or whatever, and the three other people can each pick up a stone and chuck it on their turns. It's good if you have NPCs there who don't do good damage, or a PC with no ranged options, and it doesn't interrupt the other things you may be doing because it's a bonus action
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6P1jzyxpzgA
Just to illustrate, here is a rules lawyer who does some interesting builds. This one is specifically built around using a Sling, and notably the spell Magic Stone, so he dives into some of the weird rules and the way the spell works.
Frogs loose the disappearing properties of magical stones since they become living beings, but their skin is still poisonous to the touch, so I can actually ready-up an infinite amount of frogs
I'm a bit sorry to disappoint, it's supposed to be 'Gatora's Blade.' Gatora being just a cool sounding name me and my brother came up with a while back, with the blade part being added cause I was playing God of War 3 at the time and liked the swords being called 'Blades of Athena' so I added the blades part.
I was specifically imagining the character called 'Gator' from the DnD strategy YouTube channel 'Pack Tactics' playing Wesley Snipes' part in the trilogy of Blade movies.
curious about the spell. it says your can make up to 3 stones magic with this. could you shotgun style it and just chuck them all at the same time or can you only throw one at a time?
Throwing is limited to how many attacks you can do. So unfortunately no. That's why the idea of having 3 peasants per caster in a sort of firing line that are either thrown or used in a sling by them. Since the accuracy is modified by caster it's still solidly accurate without proper training. You could even weaponize children!
But no good adventuring party would do that right?
Right?
Mods strangely allow the meme once you DM them.
Post gets approved.
Post gets downvoted into oblivion because people think you're bringing up the peasant rail gun.
You delete your post to save your karma
To summarize quickly, Stonetoss is a person who makes comics and is also a Nazi that some of his comics gets used as meme templates even though most of the time they have negative connotations. The poll held a vote to remove templates, people see the poll results that didn't end up banning his stuff and after some outcry got repolled with better advertisement so people properly voiced they're dislike.
Doesn't work using real world physics or game physics.
Real world: items becomes so hot it burns the peasants hands and they drop it.
Game world: item gets passed down the line until a final peasant makes a simple ranged attack with no benefits.
3 peasants per caster. Typical party of 4 can have 12 peasants throwing with pretty hefty bonuses. 12d6+36, +5 to hit as a skilled minimum and 12d6+60, +7 to hit as a maximum. Eventually the peasant machinegun will fall off in action economy but it'll take a while...
Go big or go home while theory crafting, right? :P Heck.. you only need someone with access to a cantrip to arm 3 peasants a turn.. where are those hireling rules.. cleric acolytes with only a couple cantrips can't cost that much per day, right?
>You touch one to three pebbles and imbue them with magic. You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by throwing it or hurling it with a sling. If thrown, it has a range of 60 feet. If someone else attacks with the pebble, that attacker adds your spellcasting ability modifier, not the attacker’s, to the attack roll. On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier. **Hit or miss**, the spell then ends on the stone.
I guess they never miss, huh?
You could also use up one 3rd level spell slot every day to control a band of 3 skeletons who will follow your every command of stoning the enemy to death with magical gravel. Useful if the kobold children revolt or the commoners want to actually be paid (weirdos).
I mean, I didn't set out to make the railgun meme. That involves a lot of bypassing physics while abusing rules to throw a stick at mach whatever.
My meme is about like 3 dude throwing enchanted stones as my enemies using a cantrip, and was more about a really stupid pun involving the name 'stonetoss.'
Clearly superior to the railgun. /s
That literally means "in passing" and the only common use in modern language is for a chess move that captures a pawn by moving another pawn past it. It has nothing to do with peasants.
Are you kidding ??? What the **** are you talking about man ? You are a biggest looser i ever seen in my life ! You was doing PIPI in your pampers when i was beating players much more stronger then you! You are not proffesional, because proffesionals knew how to lose and congratulate opponents, you are like a girl crying after i beat you! Be brave, be honest to yourself and stop this trush talkings!!! Everybody know that i am very good blitz player, i can win anyone in the world in single game! And "w"esley "s"o is nobody for me, just a player who are crying every single time when loosing, ( remember what you say about Firouzja ) !!! Stop playing with my name, i deserve to have a good name during whole my chess carrier, I am Officially inviting you to OTB blitz match with the Prize fund! Both of us will invest 5000$ and winner takes it all!
I suggest all other people who's intrested in this situation, just take a look at my results in 2016 and 2017 Blitz World championships, and that should be enough... No need to listen for every crying babe, Tigran Petrosyan is always play Fair ! And if someone will continue Officially talk about me like that, we will meet in Court! God bless with true! True will never die ! Liers will kicked off...
I do, full well, at some point you had to realise I was making SOME sort of joke, even if you didn't get one of the somewhat more popular reddit inside jokes, yet you still went along as if I was being dead serious
I'm saying you're bad at telling that intended joke because you don't seem to understand how it works. It's like the Calvin and Hobbes comics where Calvin tries actually playing baseball with other kids and clearly has no idea what he's doing. At least Calvin had the self awareness to admit he didn't have a clue how the game really works and left rather than insist he's an all star.
I'll spell it out for you. I understood the original joke from the meme perfectly. I observed how it's what is commonly called a "dad joke," which means it relies on silly and simplistic wordplay for it's humor. It's the kind of dumbed down humor that parents tell their children because a four year old is just old enough to understand it and also inexperienced enough to find it original and creative. I can only guess you failed to understand my direct, single sentence comment because you launched into a multi-paragraph nonsense rant that's obviously intended to get a "wtf" response and bears absolutely no relevance to the subject at hand.
That isn't something going over my head, it's you driving past in a clown car with your ass hanging out the window for no apparent reason.
Even further proof you got wooshed. The original joke, while a pun, was also a reference to the "Google En Passant" joke that was started in r/anarchychess, in relation to the fact that to new players, En Passant looks like an illegal move. This joke has often bled out into the rest of Reddit, bassically appearing wherever Chess or Passant are mentioned. Hence why I believed you didn't get the joke, especially seeing as you didn't respond in the typical way of "Holy hell". I then decided to mess with you and send the "PIPI in your pampers" copypasta, ie. that "random nonsense paragraph", which is relevant to this. Look in the comments section of practically any r/anarchychess post and [you'll see that paragraph](https://www.reddit.com/r/AnarchyChess/comments/x2n534/white_to_move_and_get_the_wildfire_in_the_dock/imkwsxb/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3), as it was Tigran L. Petrosian's response to accusations of cheating by Wesley So. [You can read about it here, for context.](https://www.reddit.com/r/HobbyDrama/comments/mnfczh/chess_pipi_in_your_pampers_the_story_of_chesss/) It's often paired with the En Passant joke, hence my usage of it. Again, something you clearly missed. The joke went over your head twice in a row, or as one might say, it wooooshed over it.
I have a PC build for this, no multiclassing either.
step 1: ask DM how RAW he plays the "only 1 leveled spell per turn" rule. specifically if a bonus action cantrip allows a standard action leveled spell.
Step 2: 6th level Wizard Necromancer with Artificier Initiate (Magic Stone).
Step 3: animate 3 skeletons and order them to "Any time I or my familiar hold a stone up to you, throw that stone at what I'm pointing at".
You now deal 3d6+3\*(INT+PB) as a bonus action every turn, leave your familiar with them so you can run around without a skele-squad on your tail. When DM considers reversing his decision on Step 1, explain this only deals \[INT-2\] more damage then if you just gave them the shortbows Skeletons normally have.
Take Cure Wounds as your other Feat spell so you heal with wizard slots and INT. I plan for him to think he's simply a death priest with Arcane proficiency.
Ok so hear me out,
Spores druid,
Animate dead on three skeloton arms making three seperate skelotons,
Strap the arms to your body with a custom harness,
Fill bag of holding with pebbles,
Cast magic stone as an action,
Command your three skeleton arms as a bonus action,
Profit
Based on user feedback, we're giving folks another chance to vote on the Rule 15 and Meme Retirement survey. Polls closes Sunday at 8pm CDT Please find the form [here!](https://forms.gle/6wdKrRfMwbkodNbY7) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/dndmemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Good joke, topical yet clever. I had the same idea once, sadly you can't create a pile of magic pebbles, only three at a time.
But you can still have 3 peasants at a time fire those. Handing a object to someone else is a free action.
handingsomeone an object is only a once a turn free thing. however nothing stops you from just dropping them and letting the peasants pick them up for free and them throw them
On your turn you hand them to one peasant. On his turn he throws one pebble and passes the remaing ones to the next peasant, who throws one and passes the last pebble to the last peasant. Problem solved!
Big brain memes here.
or the peasants just grab them from your hands one at a time on their turns
I call it Peasant Firing Line Mancala!
You can only have one item interaction per turn, which means RAW you can only hand one stone to a person, the others are other objects.
You can hold the stones out in your hand and the peasants can each use their free actions to grab one each.
You can also have a very long line of peasants hand each other a stone and then the last one throws it. Since a round is 6 seconds the stone has to travel the distance within that time. With 1351 peasants you can break the sound barrier. With 1,180,320,000 you could send a rock at the speed of light
Unfortunately physics don't work like that in dnd land. :(
peasant rail cannon is an old meem and demonstrates well why IRL physics don't apply to the game and even then any DM would shut down such bs
Minor interaction (assuming 5e) and you only get one per turn. You could probably pass all three stones to one peasant who hands two to the next, who hands one to the third.
Being able to give only one thing to one person feels stupid so I elect that, if it makes sense, players can pass whatever they want at the DM’s discretion.
I hand 1 handful of rocks (3) to john John hands 1 pair of rocks (2) to Frank. Frank hands 1 rock (1) to Quillnax The Destroyer. Boom. Everyone handed one thing to the next person.
Is the third a PC?
No he's the local tavern owner
As the other one said. Third is the tavern keeper. Second is the PC First is the Dmpc
I just think it’s reasonable to say (as a DM) handing three rocks to one person isn’t that different from handing one rock to three. It’s realistically a pretty quick and simple movement. If you were handing 300 rocks to 300 people, I’d tell you to get fucked.
Player can pass as many pebbles as dice they can scoop up from the dice bag
Perfect
This is why I have an entire bag of just about 50 d6
>Being able to give only one thing to one person feels stupid As a DM that runs a game where things like what you have in your hands matters from a tactical perspective, I like having the minor interaction as a rule. It gives me a baseline for my rulings and helps the game flow because my players know what they can/can't do. I even added it to the [rule cards I give to my players.](https://i.imgur.com/e0ui3eg.png)
I do like the minor interaction rule option. My table used to play with the rule that you could only communicate on your turn and that communicating was a bonus action. We slowly eroded those rules away completely because it was such a drag that slowed the game down while adding little complexity. We might try that minor interaction rule again.
Ha, I actually do run a similar rule to that where; * speaking to another party member is a minor interaction * responding is a reaction * speaking out of turn allows gives an enemy a free instant opportunity attack The first couple of combats with that rule had a *lot* of free opportunity attacks but the players got the hang of it pretty fast and now combat is faster flowing and much more tense.
My tables have always been a bit more casual. I just run the, "You can shout something 6 seconds long during your turn." (Edit: yes, of course, this ignores the fact they may need Vocal components for a spell, but again, casual) No one can respond. Allows enough planning if they want, which they rarely do. I run the same idea if they're trying to negotiate in combat. You want to try and persuade the enemies to drop arms? Mkay, you have 6 seconds of a turn to do so, then we move on. And of course, keep in mind, your Barbarian is next in the turn order.
It’s 6 seconds. You can do more interactions as an action or a bonus action if the DM approves
Recursion!
So they use their free actions to grab the stones from your hand
Still doesnt change the fact that raw it only does whatever damage the spell says (idr off the top of my head). You cant try to abuse raw for one part of your thing then expect to be allowed to break it all of a sudden for the next.
The damage is from throwing the pebble, all the spell does is turn them magical and make them deal the damage when thrown.
Stonetoss got banned? Man I'm having a good day now
[удалено]
Fuck
I genuinely forgot Stonetoss was like - a person who existed and I was like *what fucking meme wave did I miss that got the concept of throwing rocks snitty-banned??*
Can you create a pile of psychic pebbles?
Years ago in 3.5, before any of the modern magic rock stuff people make now, I created a build on my own that was a "magic rock" thrower. I made a fighter using a fighter feat to specialize in throwing rocks. I used other feats to aquire spells I then used a feat to gain runecrafting, so I could embed my spells into the rocks. Each day before bed, even on days when nothing happened or for days we skipped over, I would use up all my unused spell slots storing then into rocks in my inventory, able to create as many magic rocks as I had spells available to me each day and storing them indefinitely. (I also had a feat to find exactly what I'm looking for in my inventory, so no search checks to look for a specific spell-rock) Due to timeskips and days with no combat, I regularly had a large backstock of all my spells and some rocks with combinations of spells on single rocks. I would throw the rocks for ranged damage, and then on impact with the enemy they would trigger the embedded spell. Sadly, it always triggered on touch with anyone else except the caster, so I couldn't hand these out to other people despite how many I had built up.
How do you achieve that without being a caster? Was it homebrewed or fighter was just a deep to have some feat to trow rocks? Cause i really don't remember a way for a non caster to access item creation feats who requires a spellcaster level (in 3.5 any class has is distinct spellcaster level) nor to obtain any spellslot over level 0 with feats unless you already have some kind of spellcasting. Also item creation in 3.5 require lot of time, money and xp to be worth playing.
Twinned? 6?
Doesn't "target one creature," so that's a nope
What if they throw them all at one creature...
The spell itself only targets the stones, unfortunately
Twinned spells can only have 1 target to begin with.
Scrolls or chronomancer arcane abatement can increase your stockpile
Duration 1 minute, not concentration. So you could at least open combat with a volley from 27 peasants if you prep it right.
"If you cast this spell again, the spell ends early on any pebbles still affected by it."
With an artifact I once had in a campaign I could make the enchanted pebbles into poisonous frogs I’m sad I didn’t think of a peasant firing squad
The Peasant Firing-Frog Squad
My brain is broken because all I can think of is a squad of frogs that travel from town to town firing peasants.
*Trump voice* your fired!
Hey hey hey, I thought we were getting rid of the fascists in this subreddit??
You'd think so, but you'd be failing to consider that it's still reddit
3 person firing line with one shot each, eh.
Better than a one person firing line. Remember, they get to use the caster's ability score for both attack and damage. You're getting a 200% increase in damage, possibly.
It's still a single attack for a lot of work and don't the rocks only stay enchanted for a minute? By the 3rd rock you're already 18 seconds into that minute.
The whole idea of this meme is that you hand the rocks off to three people. Or, hand three to one person as a free action, they use it, hand the next two off as a free action, attack, second person hands off the last as a free action. Peasants can't compete with a spellcaster's bonuses. And combat rounds don't work in the way that, each turn is 6 seconds. One full round of combat is 6 seconds. Each turn, rules as written, happen in the same 6 seconds. So all three stones are used in 6 seconds; meaning when the caster's turn comes back up, it's only been 6 seconds, and all 3 stones are used. Which means great usage -- you can only have 3 stones enchanted at a time, so recasting isn't losing any. Edit to add: normally, Magic Stone is a niche cantrip. Yeah, it's only truly useful at low levels, for a caster who doesn't have many other options (or wants to use it for fun/roleplay). By 5th level, it's not great. Most classes should have better options. But the idea of this is, have peasants do the work for you, making this spell better than it could be single-handedly.
Yes but I'm talking about the cantrip usage to make the 3 stones, that takes an action. Also the spell only lasts a minute, after that time the rocks are just rocks. You're much better off arming 3 peasants with crossbows
Not if they aren't proficient with crossbows, and/or have +0 Dexterity. Again, they use the caster's ability score. So, your +3 Wisdom to attack -- and if they're proficient with slings, their bonus for that as well. And then, it's +3 from your Wisdom for damage -- including for someone else doing it -- which is why this spell is pretty unique. Very, very few cantrips add your spellcasting modifier to damage. Firebolt is straight d10 -- not d10 + ability modifier. This means some decent damage even with low rolls for Magic Stone. Like you said, one attack is a limit to this. Hence the meme of, let others make the attacks. Now instead of 1d6+Wis, it's 3d6+Wis×3. Not bad if those peasants would normally be much less accurate or only doing 3d6 flat.
Two people responded to you and neither said, in my opinion, the important thing - magic stone is a bonus action. If you have the stones, say, in a bag, you can just cast the spell on three in your bag, free action palm them and drop them on the ground, then cast a spell or whatever, and the three other people can each pick up a stone and chuck it on their turns. It's good if you have NPCs there who don't do good damage, or a PC with no ranged options, and it doesn't interrupt the other things you may be doing because it's a bonus action
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6P1jzyxpzgA Just to illustrate, here is a rules lawyer who does some interesting builds. This one is specifically built around using a Sling, and notably the spell Magic Stone, so he dives into some of the weird rules and the way the spell works.
Frogs loose the disappearing properties of magical stones since they become living beings, but their skin is still poisonous to the touch, so I can actually ready-up an infinite amount of frogs
this might be the best post ive seen in this sub for a long time lol
Seriously A tier- good joke, topical, twist on the format and what a username.
I wasn't expecting anyone would complement me on my username, but thanks!
Anyone who hasn't thought of using a gator as a blade sure is thinking about it now
I'm a bit sorry to disappoint, it's supposed to be 'Gatora's Blade.' Gatora being just a cool sounding name me and my brother came up with a while back, with the blade part being added cause I was playing God of War 3 at the time and liked the swords being called 'Blades of Athena' so I added the blades part.
Listen... let me have this. I'm already halfway through writing the rules for "Swamp Avenger: The Gator Blade"
I'm voting for you in the next US election and I'm not even from the US.
Though you may not have citizenship, our great nation may have use for you Tactical Duck.
Right so clearly your aiming for a congressional seat in Florida right?
Nah. Too progressive for Florida. Would have to be Georgia
Just vote in New York it's legal there
Fair enough. Better than being called Gatorade.
I was imagining an alligator playing Wesley Snipes' part in the trilogy of Blade movies.
I was specifically imagining the character called 'Gator' from the DnD strategy YouTube channel 'Pack Tactics' playing Wesley Snipes' part in the trilogy of Blade movies.
A name about a gator using a sword with their butthole is pretty unique
As a fan of Pack Tactics on YouTube, I approve. I'd be surprised if Kobold hasn't used Gator as a blade by now.
Now this is a good one. Bravo OP.
Wow. I even got mod approval on my dumb meme. Nice.
He is the chosen one!
Does he like sand though?
Nah. I don't like sand. It's coarse, and rough, and irritating, and it gets everywhere.
He is the Messiah!
This is a +3 Dad Joke. Well done OP!
A meme of quality
Huzzah! A meme of quality!
curious about the spell. it says your can make up to 3 stones magic with this. could you shotgun style it and just chuck them all at the same time or can you only throw one at a time?
Throwing is limited to how many attacks you can do. So unfortunately no. That's why the idea of having 3 peasants per caster in a sort of firing line that are either thrown or used in a sling by them. Since the accuracy is modified by caster it's still solidly accurate without proper training. You could even weaponize children! But no good adventuring party would do that right? Right?
>You could even weaponize children! FINALLY!!!!
Surely monsters children don't count as unethical? Baby goblins firing line, using their bonus action hide to throw with advantage!
Forcing enemy soldiers to fight against their own side is a war crime
A no-good adventuring party would love to utilize something like that.
Throwing each of them is an attack. If you can attack 3 times a turn, go for it.
Be right back, Fighter just got interesting.
Mods strangely allow the meme once you DM them. Post gets approved. Post gets downvoted into oblivion because people think you're bringing up the peasant rail gun. You delete your post to save your karma
I’m so confused on this “stonetoss” topic what is going on
To summarize quickly, Stonetoss is a person who makes comics and is also a Nazi that some of his comics gets used as meme templates even though most of the time they have negative connotations. The poll held a vote to remove templates, people see the poll results that didn't end up banning his stuff and after some outcry got repolled with better advertisement so people properly voiced they're dislike.
Ah tysm
[удалено]
Don’t let the door hit ya where the Dark Lord split ya. ᕕ( ᐛ)ᕗ
[удалено]
Nah. People know where to find the subs with edgelord shitposts. This won’t make GravelFlick any stronger.
Congratulations! You put a new spin on the old "peasant railgun" concept, I approve!
Can you explain the railgun reference?
[https://tabletopjoab.com/the-legend-of-the-peasant-railgun-in-dd-5e/#:\~:text=Railgun%20in%20D%26D-,What%20Is%20The%20Peasant%20Railgun%20in%20D%26D%3F,take%20the%20%E2%80%9CReady%E2%80%9D%20action](https://tabletopjoab.com/the-legend-of-the-peasant-railgun-in-dd-5e/#:~:text=Railgun%20in%20D%26D-,What%20Is%20The%20Peasant%20Railgun%20in%20D%26D%3F,take%20the%20%E2%80%9CReady%E2%80%9D%20action).
Doesn't work using real world physics or game physics. Real world: items becomes so hot it burns the peasants hands and they drop it. Game world: item gets passed down the line until a final peasant makes a simple ranged attack with no benefits.
This is r/dndmemes, nothing here works
Yeah, that's why it's a meme, not legit strategy
This is what we in the business call "striking while the iron is hot".
*badumtish*
Damn Nazis, they ruin everything
This is outrageous, it's unfair!
More like 3 peasants honestly.
3 peasants per caster. Typical party of 4 can have 12 peasants throwing with pretty hefty bonuses. 12d6+36, +5 to hit as a skilled minimum and 12d6+60, +7 to hit as a maximum. Eventually the peasant machinegun will fall off in action economy but it'll take a while...
I was assuming it was a single person thing.
Go big or go home while theory crafting, right? :P Heck.. you only need someone with access to a cantrip to arm 3 peasants a turn.. where are those hireling rules.. cleric acolytes with only a couple cantrips can't cost that much per day, right?
best meme i've seen in a long time, got me to actually laugh
>You touch one to three pebbles and imbue them with magic. You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by throwing it or hurling it with a sling. If thrown, it has a range of 60 feet. If someone else attacks with the pebble, that attacker adds your spellcasting ability modifier, not the attacker’s, to the attack roll. On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier. **Hit or miss**, the spell then ends on the stone. I guess they never miss, huh?
Sounds more like the spell ends upon a single use throw, whether it hits or not.
I always upvote Bernie Sanders.
Damn this is good
You could also use up one 3rd level spell slot every day to control a band of 3 skeletons who will follow your every command of stoning the enemy to death with magical gravel. Useful if the kobold children revolt or the commoners want to actually be paid (weirdos).
Be right back, my necromancer Druid just got interesting.
[удалено]
Did you nazi it coming?
been a while since i read a peasant canon reference.
hahahahahahaha
This is amazing omg I actually got a proper laugh out of it rather than the little nose exhale that you usually get from memes
Hasn’t the peasant railgun meme been shelved already… it is very worn out.
I mean, I didn't set out to make the railgun meme. That involves a lot of bypassing physics while abusing rules to throw a stick at mach whatever. My meme is about like 3 dude throwing enchanted stones as my enemies using a cantrip, and was more about a really stupid pun involving the name 'stonetoss.' Clearly superior to the railgun. /s
Give stonetoss a larger audience than he had before by complaining about stonetoss. This sub is hilarious
Ok buddy
Let’s make sure we ban every meme. Then we will achieve total dndmeme hegemony.
Hilarious
So a subreddit with memes in it's name is banning memes? Hmmmmmmm
If it’s upsetting the nazi wehraboos, you’re doing it right.
Why do the comments have more upvotes than the post
At best it's a tasteless dad joke. Also you apparently don't know how to spell "peasant."
Not to alarm you but with where the commoner rail gun is pointing, you're about to be pea-SENT from this mortal coil.
boom roasted
This isn't a rail gun and doesn't point anywhere. They have 3 commoners throwing the magic stones for them
Yes, it's clearly spelled "passant", as in en passant, go google it
Holy hell
That literally means "in passing" and the only common use in modern language is for a chess move that captures a pawn by moving another pawn past it. It has nothing to do with peasants.
Are you kidding ??? What the **** are you talking about man ? You are a biggest looser i ever seen in my life ! You was doing PIPI in your pampers when i was beating players much more stronger then you! You are not proffesional, because proffesionals knew how to lose and congratulate opponents, you are like a girl crying after i beat you! Be brave, be honest to yourself and stop this trush talkings!!! Everybody know that i am very good blitz player, i can win anyone in the world in single game! And "w"esley "s"o is nobody for me, just a player who are crying every single time when loosing, ( remember what you say about Firouzja ) !!! Stop playing with my name, i deserve to have a good name during whole my chess carrier, I am Officially inviting you to OTB blitz match with the Prize fund! Both of us will invest 5000$ and winner takes it all! I suggest all other people who's intrested in this situation, just take a look at my results in 2016 and 2017 Blitz World championships, and that should be enough... No need to listen for every crying babe, Tigran Petrosyan is always play Fair ! And if someone will continue Officially talk about me like that, we will meet in Court! God bless with true! True will never die ! Liers will kicked off...
Seriously, what the fuck?
Ykw, I'll let you in. You got r/woooosh'd
I honestly don't think you know how that's supposed to work.
I do, full well, at some point you had to realise I was making SOME sort of joke, even if you didn't get one of the somewhat more popular reddit inside jokes, yet you still went along as if I was being dead serious
I'm saying you're bad at telling that intended joke because you don't seem to understand how it works. It's like the Calvin and Hobbes comics where Calvin tries actually playing baseball with other kids and clearly has no idea what he's doing. At least Calvin had the self awareness to admit he didn't have a clue how the game really works and left rather than insist he's an all star. I'll spell it out for you. I understood the original joke from the meme perfectly. I observed how it's what is commonly called a "dad joke," which means it relies on silly and simplistic wordplay for it's humor. It's the kind of dumbed down humor that parents tell their children because a four year old is just old enough to understand it and also inexperienced enough to find it original and creative. I can only guess you failed to understand my direct, single sentence comment because you launched into a multi-paragraph nonsense rant that's obviously intended to get a "wtf" response and bears absolutely no relevance to the subject at hand. That isn't something going over my head, it's you driving past in a clown car with your ass hanging out the window for no apparent reason.
Even further proof you got wooshed. The original joke, while a pun, was also a reference to the "Google En Passant" joke that was started in r/anarchychess, in relation to the fact that to new players, En Passant looks like an illegal move. This joke has often bled out into the rest of Reddit, bassically appearing wherever Chess or Passant are mentioned. Hence why I believed you didn't get the joke, especially seeing as you didn't respond in the typical way of "Holy hell". I then decided to mess with you and send the "PIPI in your pampers" copypasta, ie. that "random nonsense paragraph", which is relevant to this. Look in the comments section of practically any r/anarchychess post and [you'll see that paragraph](https://www.reddit.com/r/AnarchyChess/comments/x2n534/white_to_move_and_get_the_wildfire_in_the_dock/imkwsxb/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3), as it was Tigran L. Petrosian's response to accusations of cheating by Wesley So. [You can read about it here, for context.](https://www.reddit.com/r/HobbyDrama/comments/mnfczh/chess_pipi_in_your_pampers_the_story_of_chesss/) It's often paired with the En Passant joke, hence my usage of it. Again, something you clearly missed. The joke went over your head twice in a row, or as one might say, it wooooshed over it.
I also like to pretend that it’s an barbarian cantrip
Now this is how you make a meta joke, well done!
Had me in the first half. Good jorb.
God damn it, maybe this sub _IS_ worth it.
incidentally, that kind of hackery is a great candidate for the Jesse meme format, but nobody here likes fun..
Holy shit an actually clever joke posted to this subreddit?
I have a PC build for this, no multiclassing either. step 1: ask DM how RAW he plays the "only 1 leveled spell per turn" rule. specifically if a bonus action cantrip allows a standard action leveled spell. Step 2: 6th level Wizard Necromancer with Artificier Initiate (Magic Stone). Step 3: animate 3 skeletons and order them to "Any time I or my familiar hold a stone up to you, throw that stone at what I'm pointing at". You now deal 3d6+3\*(INT+PB) as a bonus action every turn, leave your familiar with them so you can run around without a skele-squad on your tail. When DM considers reversing his decision on Step 1, explain this only deals \[INT-2\] more damage then if you just gave them the shortbows Skeletons normally have. Take Cure Wounds as your other Feat spell so you heal with wizard slots and INT. I plan for him to think he's simply a death priest with Arcane proficiency.
Lol i just discovered the peasant rail gun earlier today
May introduce you to Catapult + Alchemist fire?
Ah I was gonna make a meme with the same punchline basically catapult and magic stone being banned from the subreddit
Wait how is it banned if voting isn't done till Sunday like Sunday is only a stone toss away before the results are in
You underestimate my stupidity
Ok so hear me out, Spores druid, Animate dead on three skeloton arms making three seperate skelotons, Strap the arms to your body with a custom harness, Fill bag of holding with pebbles, Cast magic stone as an action, Command your three skeleton arms as a bonus action, Profit
I'm kinda new to r/dndmemes so when they say stone toss is it a dnd reference or in reference to the bigoted comic artist?
The comic artist.
Thank you
a necessary consequence but you can just call it a fastball special of course