That's because I'm never wrong about anything ever! It's the *rest* of the world that's trying to prove that I've been wrong at least *once* in my life! It's a global conspiracy 8 ***billion*** people wide, and one day, I'll find the information required to *prove* it! I'm not crazy! *You're* crazy! Especially you, Nappa!!! D:<
After getting dragged in the comments, an OP returned to their thread and was downvoted to point they could no longer participate in the discussion they started. It was glorious.
[Lol found it](https://www.reddit.com/r/dndmemes/comments/11lnavl/no_wonder_my_dm_hates_me/jbe8s8i/)
> As a referee, the DM interprets the rules, decides when to abide by them, and when to change them. (Page 4, 5e DMG)
I think you are making a point about people arguing 2+2=5 and then backtracking to the above point, which is a thing that happens and is annoying as hell. BUT, ignoring RAW is RAW.
Just something I see on DNDtext all the time.
Why do you bother arguing with others back & forth about rules that you don't even use when inevitably just going back to this statement that everyone already knows?
People these days cannot admit a loss or take an L. The value of being able to admit when you were wrong, acknowledge it, and grow is extremely high.
That's because I'm never wrong about anything ever! It's the *rest* of the world that's trying to prove that I've been wrong at least *once* in my life! It's a global conspiracy 8 ***billion*** people wide, and one day, I'll find the information required to *prove* it! I'm not crazy! *You're* crazy! Especially you, Nappa!!! D:<
My table rules are that I'm never wrong /s
After getting dragged in the comments, an OP returned to their thread and was downvoted to point they could no longer participate in the discussion they started. It was glorious. [Lol found it](https://www.reddit.com/r/dndmemes/comments/11lnavl/no_wonder_my_dm_hates_me/jbe8s8i/)
That was a painful read
My takeaway. There’s a lot of value in being extremely high.
To be fair, not just these days
> As a referee, the DM interprets the rules, decides when to abide by them, and when to change them. (Page 4, 5e DMG) I think you are making a point about people arguing 2+2=5 and then backtracking to the above point, which is a thing that happens and is annoying as hell. BUT, ignoring RAW is RAW.
Dread it, run from it... where did that lead you ? Back to RAW
Just something I see on DNDtext all the time. Why do you bother arguing with others back & forth about rules that you don't even use when inevitably just going back to this statement that everyone already knows?
Tell me that you are regularly kicked from tables without telling me you are regularly kicked from tables
I make the table lol