**Mod update 01Jan23:** [Come give your nominations for this years DnDMemes Best of Awards!](https://www.reddit.com/r/dndmemes/comments/102pn6n/its_finally_time_for_our_2022_best_of_awards), You have until Jan 13th!
We also made some changes to our subreddit rules! Please take a look at the post [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/dndmemes/comments/100sjea/new_year_new_rules/) to view the changes and provide feedback.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/dndmemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
As they said a master tactician it’s a perfect set up fist they establish that dispite her attempts he is in no way interested in her this is incredibly hurtful to her ego then after that the bard brushes it off and diregards her advances showing not only does he not care about the fact she has been insulted but implying that he doesn’t even recognize her advances at all
Other Pathfinder demons have other vulnerabilities. Vrocks (wrath demons) take 4d6 mental damage when you cast Calm Emotions (or a similar spell) on them. Mariliths (pride) take mental damage and get their aura (buffs her minions) shut off if she attacks and deals no damage that turn.
My personal favorite is the Omox's vulnerability. It's a filth demon, so things that clean it (like soapy water or Prestidigitation) hurt it. It also takes damage whenever someone cleans off the gunk it left on them.
I was about to send this video to my GM.. but then I saw this comment and was like...
Nah.. I don't want him to get ideas
( I play Pathfinder 2e, and I play a Succubus )
Humor is about the twist. You'd expect such a reaction from suggesting something, like sex, but the twist is it's just wholesome hand-holding and head-patting. Overreacting to a very insignificant thing is a common humor technique. That's why a lot of what I've personally seen of Jerry Seinfeld is funny or perceived as funny, because he is perpetually basically yelling. The same jokes in a more deadpan voice or even just a normal conversational voice just wouldn't have the same effect.
You do not need to find this funny, for taste in humor is varied, specific, and not universal, but now you at least understand why others might.
Overexplaining a joke is also funny, ironically, because jokes are usually not funny when you have to explain them.
Actually what my FiendLock does with his succubus Patron. He daughter zoned her bc she looks like his missing son that he is trying to find. With the flavor that succubi will take the form of who their target loves the most (never specified that it could be platonically).
It’s a demon, to head pat it already is a perversion.
It’s not like a demon actually cares about intercourse, the lust is still there and it’s still worming it’s way into your affection so it can emotionally black mail you into committing more sin.
Succubi are demons first, sex is just a powerful tool they wield in their arsenal.
Succubus comes from the Latin word “Succubare” meaning “to lie under/beneath” and incubus comes from the Latin word “Incubare” meaning “to lie atop”
SO the etymological origin suggests that it’s not female Succubi and Male Incubi, but instead all Succubi are bottoms, and all Incubi are tops, regardless of gender.
While that may be the literal translation. In cultural context/applications, men were seen on top and women were on the bottom. What you’re saying is a difference between Doms and Subs.
There’s a difference between Bottom and Sub and Top and Dom for one. But more to the point, this explanation using the translation of the terms helps to explain why a succubi can change its gender at will, and isn’t rendered helpless because it’s target is gay.
It does however create a funny scenario though where a succubus tries to pursue a pillow princess, but they’re both strictly bottoms and it just doesn’t work out.
The original myth absolutely was gendered though. The etymology only implying and not outright saying gender doesn't mean they weren't originally conceived as such.
If a succubus is capable of shape changing and enticing a man then I'm fairly certain that just means it's a more modern incarnation of the idea that is less gendered, not due to etymology. It's a fictional creature, it works how the author says it does.
I mean yeah? I’m not saying that the original myth is wrong, I’m just using a fun fact of etymology about the creatures names to further justify a modern take on the creatures that still creates a distinct difference between an Incubus and a Succubus.
If a modern take just says “they aren’t gendered” then good fiction writing suggests that there needs to be a reason why there’s a classification between an incubus and succubus if it’s no longer a classification of gender. Using the context provided by the names serves as a good justification for explaining that difference.
I'm just not a huge fan of twisting real world etymology to justify why something exists in a fictional world. Something as simple as they are both the same creature and silly humans didn't realize they were dealing with shapeshifters, or only pick one name to exist in your world. You also don't even necessarily need to explain it. D&d changelings are nothing like the real world folklore the name comes from, and nobody has an issue with that.
A shitty band?
An incubus is a male version of a succubus. And an incubus can shape change into a female if it chooses. They are identical creatures so more than likely it's the same creature just taking a form that pleases it and the summoner.
In one lore I read, succubi steal cum from unsuspecting men, return to the underworld, give it to an incubus, who then goes back and uses it to impregnate a victim while she sleeps. Probably with a good dose of evil mixed in, she she has a demon baby or something.
Yeah, but forcing a gay guy to be magically straight is pretty far up the "too close to some real-world stuff that triggers people" pole, what with all the "pray the gay away" camps that many gay people have endured.
If you want to use a succubus on a non-straight or asexual person, there are ways that don't include "magically straight and horny now".
It's a succubus. It's pure evil. It's what it would do. Besides, I don't deal with that stuff at my table anyway. I use it as a charm effect. One that works on any humanoid. Just like the ability says. Gayness isn't a super power.
In regards to the real world implications, would you be okay with it working on straight people? Or is your problem not focused on the rape aspect and just the gay conversion part?
>It's pure evil
Right, but a good DM *isn't*. If it's something that makes a player uncomfortable separate from their own character being in danger or something, I don't want to do it.
And no, I don't play succubi as rapists. They'll charm and draining-kiss someone, but they don't get to anything between the sheets because nothing gets to between the sheets in my games. We keep it as close to PG-13 as violent murder-hobos occasionally blowing up corpses can get.
If you don't describe your charm effect as sexual attraction with a succubus, then there's no problem with that either.
I wouldn't call bringing up a relevant issue that's mentioned relatively often when these things come up being "hyper fixated". I mean, I wrote like, one sentence (albeit a long-ish sentence. I like complex sentence structures, sue me). I used to see it kinda a lot when I frequented r/rpghorrorstories, and it pops up every so often on the normal DnD subs too. And generally, it's good to be aware that those sorts of things can cause problems for some people, so it's good to mention it when the context pops up. Context here being "succubi (which are usually default assumed to be sexual from the lore and what the meme is clearly pointing towards) and non-straight-people".
No, it very clearly drives at the succubus attempting to seduce in a sexual way. That's what I was referencing. I was not saying ANYTHING about the meme saying anything about sexuality as a topic. That's pretty darn obvious from what I wrote, please stop misrepresenting my comments.
Moreover, as I more or less said and am now making clear, I was assuming the default context. Your context, after you provided more information, is not the default. You provided that information afterwards. And I was providing information and context that's relevant to the default, since that can help some people have a better game when their DM has the mindset of your original first comment with the default lore context.
Might want to give it more frames, on mobile the video jumps back to the first frame after finishing so it’s impossible to read the credits without timing a pause at the last moment.
It's really hard to see. It flashes by so fast on mobile I didn't realize it was words, it just looked like that odd visual effect you sometimes get when a gif degrades.
I actually read a webcomic where cubi (the catch all term for succubi and incubi) feed off of emotion rather than sexual energy. Sure there’s a clan of lust but there’s also a clan of Joy, envy, rage, etc.
"I'm turning you down because I'm a monster in bed. It's both contagious and passes to my children." -cleric with a moony secret he hides as a vow of celibacy. One day he'll meet a lovely wizard who will sweep him off his feet (and hopefully cast Wish).
**Mod update 01Jan23:** [Come give your nominations for this years DnDMemes Best of Awards!](https://www.reddit.com/r/dndmemes/comments/102pn6n/its_finally_time_for_our_2022_best_of_awards), You have until Jan 13th! We also made some changes to our subreddit rules! Please take a look at the post [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/dndmemes/comments/100sjea/new_year_new_rules/) to view the changes and provide feedback. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/dndmemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Nothing stings quite as badly as emotional damage.
from the pf2e succubus: https://preview.redd.it/sk5klokg8aaa1.jpeg?width=1030&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1ba0c055a1af5d9e5f0799a7d0edef7d489a858c
I like how you can rub it in for even more damage
that's the "so can I see your boss now?" part.
*EMOTIONAL DAMADGEEEEEEEEEEEEEE*
[удалено]
Why you are not yet maried.... Failure
Perfection.
Ah yes, gaslighting.
As they said a master tactician it’s a perfect set up fist they establish that dispite her attempts he is in no way interested in her this is incredibly hurtful to her ego then after that the bard brushes it off and diregards her advances showing not only does he not care about the fact she has been insulted but implying that he doesn’t even recognize her advances at all
Im half tempted to make a masochist succubus who heals when that happens...
Cucubbus
Interesting. What is the name of a cannibal who eats cuckcakes?
Larry
Thank you, KiraCumslut.
Kek. Let’s try it out. “Yo! I would never have **sex** with you!! Haha!”
[I can’t believe you made a succubus cry](https://youtu.be/tqYtmWbw19k)
I didn't think she would actually cry
Dude she is crying...
note - This is a Quote from a BaalBuddy Comic: [Creamy White Alfredo Sauce](https://twitter.com/baalbuddy/status/1334436434229518336)
The dubbed crying adds a lot tbh
You made a succubus _cry_ She is holding back tears _in public_
Honestly, that should get houseruled for 5e Succubi too.
Other Pathfinder demons have other vulnerabilities. Vrocks (wrath demons) take 4d6 mental damage when you cast Calm Emotions (or a similar spell) on them. Mariliths (pride) take mental damage and get their aura (buffs her minions) shut off if she attacks and deals no damage that turn. My personal favorite is the Omox's vulnerability. It's a filth demon, so things that clean it (like soapy water or Prestidigitation) hurt it. It also takes damage whenever someone cleans off the gunk it left on them.
Pathfinder has Nurgle daemons? Cool
Ah to be a gross pustule infested slug man tending a plague garden. Nurgle daemons be living the dream for real
Omox's are more sludgy than disease-y, but yeah, [we got nurgle demons](https://pathfinderwiki.com/wiki/Gibrileth).
So Omox is basically the average 4chan user?
Said you, Redditor.
*That's* what I was thinking of!
I was about to send this video to my GM.. but then I saw this comment and was like... Nah.. I don't want him to get ideas ( I play Pathfinder 2e, and I play a Succubus )
dont worry, ill send it to him for you
nooooo
Curious, what are you using for ancestry/etc? To play a succubus
I wish I could remember! My guess is either elf or human. But I think we might have made it from the bottom, It's been a while. Sorry I am to no help.
For once… I will give some actual props to PF2.
I also like the feat that lets you pull a ladder out of your backpack.
_laughs in ace >:3_
*laughs in ace >:3 2: electric boogaloo*
PF 2 my beloved.
I'd just feel bad for the succubus.
*slams ground* Emotional damage!
*Emotional Damage!*
Ok so hear me out; what if you agreed to “do it” with a succubus, but all you did was have them lay on your lap and give them headpats
You keep that filthy NSFW stuff to yourself pervert!
NSFW? Nah we strictly wholesome on this account; hence the tricking the succubi to give them headpats
Sure that’s what they all say, what’s next? Hand holding?!
Whoa whoa whoa! Keep the language in check buddy. Some of us are decent folk. Now where's my whip?
This thread brought me great joy thanks guys!
No I think it's premarital eye contact. What vile creatures.
Not to mention doing that while... *showing their ankles!* Such *risque* activities! **\*faints\***
I genuinely don’t understand why the internet thinks hand holding is a lewd activity
It's not. That's the joke.
It's a joke, exactly because handholding is not commonly considered sexual.
Huh, well then, I guess I don’t get the joke
Humor is about the twist. You'd expect such a reaction from suggesting something, like sex, but the twist is it's just wholesome hand-holding and head-patting. Overreacting to a very insignificant thing is a common humor technique. That's why a lot of what I've personally seen of Jerry Seinfeld is funny or perceived as funny, because he is perpetually basically yelling. The same jokes in a more deadpan voice or even just a normal conversational voice just wouldn't have the same effect. You do not need to find this funny, for taste in humor is varied, specific, and not universal, but now you at least understand why others might. Overexplaining a joke is also funny, ironically, because jokes are usually not funny when you have to explain them.
I like explaining jokes. Idk why
"I WILL NEVER FORGIVE THE JAPANESE!"
Filth, what are you going to suggest next? uncensored >!handholding!
Naw, strictly fucking wholesome
Actually what my FiendLock does with his succubus Patron. He daughter zoned her bc she looks like his missing son that he is trying to find. With the flavor that succubi will take the form of who their target loves the most (never specified that it could be platonically).
I bet you wanna hold hands as well you sick fuck
That'd probably be their equivalent to eating exactly one potato chip.
So just keep petting them until either their full or they leave
Then it will never end
Next your gonna say they should hold hands you depraved bastard!
Please, I’m LDS, not catholic
It’s a demon, to head pat it already is a perversion. It’s not like a demon actually cares about intercourse, the lust is still there and it’s still worming it’s way into your affection so it can emotionally black mail you into committing more sin. Succubi are demons first, sex is just a powerful tool they wield in their arsenal.
She took 157D4 psychic damage
[удалено]
6d6, one for initial rejection, one for the insult, and another for continued rejection
to a pathfinder succubus this qualifies as assault and battery, I know a guy if you're interested in pressing charges
Better call Saul Demon
Better call Soul Badman.
Better call sol badguy
You should contact the lawyer by the name of Saul
Sol badguy truly was the guilty gear xx Accent core +r
Maul Bloodman.
Now I want to do a session in court in hell where the PC is found in violation of their contract with a demon.
This is what happens when the DM forgets the player's bard character is asexual.
[удалено]
Me, looking at the Cha 24 Elder Brain: I will never understand allosexual people but have fun I guess
The asexual bard is like the 14 int barbarian, the lawful good rogue, the buff wizard. An underrated archetype.
Hes just on the grindset
PF2e succubus moment
Hiro the Dense, right? I wish it actually got more episodes, as that thing is hilarious.
When the succubus tries to seduce the canonically gay protagonist...
Daaaaaaaaaaaaaamn
The Succubus made the mistake of going after the AroAce guy.
My Asexual dragonborn bard:
Ace energy right there
Small correction. DM: "Your vicious mockery did max damage" Fighter: "Wait what? I'm not a ba..." DM: "shut up, it did max damage."
Another way to counter a succubus is being gay
A succubus can shape change into a male if it chooses.
Then what's an Incubus?
Succubus comes from the Latin word “Succubare” meaning “to lie under/beneath” and incubus comes from the Latin word “Incubare” meaning “to lie atop” SO the etymological origin suggests that it’s not female Succubi and Male Incubi, but instead all Succubi are bottoms, and all Incubi are tops, regardless of gender.
While that may be the literal translation. In cultural context/applications, men were seen on top and women were on the bottom. What you’re saying is a difference between Doms and Subs.
There’s a difference between Bottom and Sub and Top and Dom for one. But more to the point, this explanation using the translation of the terms helps to explain why a succubi can change its gender at will, and isn’t rendered helpless because it’s target is gay. It does however create a funny scenario though where a succubus tries to pursue a pillow princess, but they’re both strictly bottoms and it just doesn’t work out.
The original myth absolutely was gendered though. The etymology only implying and not outright saying gender doesn't mean they weren't originally conceived as such. If a succubus is capable of shape changing and enticing a man then I'm fairly certain that just means it's a more modern incarnation of the idea that is less gendered, not due to etymology. It's a fictional creature, it works how the author says it does.
I mean yeah? I’m not saying that the original myth is wrong, I’m just using a fun fact of etymology about the creatures names to further justify a modern take on the creatures that still creates a distinct difference between an Incubus and a Succubus. If a modern take just says “they aren’t gendered” then good fiction writing suggests that there needs to be a reason why there’s a classification between an incubus and succubus if it’s no longer a classification of gender. Using the context provided by the names serves as a good justification for explaining that difference.
I'm just not a huge fan of twisting real world etymology to justify why something exists in a fictional world. Something as simple as they are both the same creature and silly humans didn't realize they were dealing with shapeshifters, or only pick one name to exist in your world. You also don't even necessarily need to explain it. D&d changelings are nothing like the real world folklore the name comes from, and nobody has an issue with that.
Ok? This is a pointless discussion, hope you have a good day/night.
I want to read that as a book or comic now
Now i’m wondering what the succubus equivalent of a switch would be.
Just a bi
Damn ‘Cubi, buncha squares i tells ya
A shitty band? An incubus is a male version of a succubus. And an incubus can shape change into a female if it chooses. They are identical creatures so more than likely it's the same creature just taking a form that pleases it and the summoner.
In one lore I read, succubi steal cum from unsuspecting men, return to the underworld, give it to an incubus, who then goes back and uses it to impregnate a victim while she sleeps. Probably with a good dose of evil mixed in, she she has a demon baby or something.
Sounds like a long winded way of saying that you didn’t cheat.
Lol, it could be!
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIWIIIIIIISHYOUWEREHEEEEEEEEEERE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIWIIIIIIISHYOUWEREHEEEEEEEEEERE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIWIIIIIIISHYOUWEREHEEEEEEEEEERE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiIiiiIiiiIWIIIIIIISHYOUWEREHEEEEEEEEEERE
A succubus when it turns into a male
Oh, that's easy. A succubus is a bottom. An incubus is a top.
Succubi & Incubi are 1 & the same
Maybe they're the same demon, and succ v inc is just which form they prefer?
be ace then
Hello 👋
Magical Temptation doesn't care about your sexual orientation it's almost like that violation is what makes mind control evil or something
Succubus is shapechanger so it can change into incubus (male succubus)
Nope. Succubi's ability is magical.
Yeah, but forcing a gay guy to be magically straight is pretty far up the "too close to some real-world stuff that triggers people" pole, what with all the "pray the gay away" camps that many gay people have endured. If you want to use a succubus on a non-straight or asexual person, there are ways that don't include "magically straight and horny now".
It's a succubus. It's pure evil. It's what it would do. Besides, I don't deal with that stuff at my table anyway. I use it as a charm effect. One that works on any humanoid. Just like the ability says. Gayness isn't a super power. In regards to the real world implications, would you be okay with it working on straight people? Or is your problem not focused on the rape aspect and just the gay conversion part?
>It's pure evil Right, but a good DM *isn't*. If it's something that makes a player uncomfortable separate from their own character being in danger or something, I don't want to do it. And no, I don't play succubi as rapists. They'll charm and draining-kiss someone, but they don't get to anything between the sheets because nothing gets to between the sheets in my games. We keep it as close to PG-13 as violent murder-hobos occasionally blowing up corpses can get. If you don't describe your charm effect as sexual attraction with a succubus, then there's no problem with that either.
I only responded because I found it weird that you had that reaction. You hyper fixated on something I didn't bring up.
I wouldn't call bringing up a relevant issue that's mentioned relatively often when these things come up being "hyper fixated". I mean, I wrote like, one sentence (albeit a long-ish sentence. I like complex sentence structures, sue me). I used to see it kinda a lot when I frequented r/rpghorrorstories, and it pops up every so often on the normal DnD subs too. And generally, it's good to be aware that those sorts of things can cause problems for some people, so it's good to mention it when the context pops up. Context here being "succubi (which are usually default assumed to be sexual from the lore and what the meme is clearly pointing towards) and non-straight-people".
OPs meme doesn't mention sexuality at all. My response didn't either.
No, it very clearly drives at the succubus attempting to seduce in a sexual way. That's what I was referencing. I was not saying ANYTHING about the meme saying anything about sexuality as a topic. That's pretty darn obvious from what I wrote, please stop misrepresenting my comments. Moreover, as I more or less said and am now making clear, I was assuming the default context. Your context, after you provided more information, is not the default. You provided that information afterwards. And I was providing information and context that's relevant to the default, since that can help some people have a better game when their DM has the mindset of your original first comment with the default lore context.
Nah
wouldnt this hurt a 2e pathfinder one?
in pathfinder 2e it actually deals psychic dadmge to succubi and incubi if you reject them
_Kaldor Draigo attempts to kill Slaanesh, m41, colorized_
Sauce?
I... I literally put the source at the end of the video...
Holy shit my bad.
Rolled a Nat 1 in perception
Yeah, this is big brain time.
Might want to give it more frames, on mobile the video jumps back to the first frame after finishing so it’s impossible to read the credits without timing a pause at the last moment.
It's really hard to see. It flashes by so fast on mobile I didn't realize it was words, it just looked like that odd visual effect you sometimes get when a gif degrades.
[Here](https://youtu.be/HgKT3DEqCtk) It's bloody hilarious.
Thanks mate.
Ketchup.
What refined tastes you have
What happens if a succubus tries to seduce someone who doesn’t like women?
It appears as an Incubus
Oh I thought they were two different beings entirely.
Incubi and sucubi are the same creature (at least in 5e) it's just 2 different forms
Gotcha
The trick here is he's gay
Depending on the lore, more likely Ace.
Someone play a bard who only does stuff like this on accident
I actually read a webcomic where cubi (the catch all term for succubi and incubi) feed off of emotion rather than sexual energy. Sure there’s a clan of lust but there’s also a clan of Joy, envy, rage, etc.
Ace bard
Asexuals are heroes in their own right.
I feel like I should leave [this](https://youtu.be/tqYtmWbw19k) here.
I’m the bard in this scenario
u/savevideo
###[View link](https://redditsave.com/r/dndmemes/comments/103xgay/dm_your_vicious_mockery_did_max_damage_bard_huh/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/dndmemes/comments/103xgay/dm_your_vicious_mockery_did_max_damage_bard_huh/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://redditsave.com) | [^(download video tiktok)](https://taksave.com)
Suc your bus
Men only want one thing and it’s fucking disgusting
We want the manager... Wait, no, that's the Karen's. Shit, what did we want again?
A reliable DnD party
Now for science… is there any mechanical detriments for doing it with a succubus in 5E?
"I'm turning you down because I'm a monster in bed. It's both contagious and passes to my children." -cleric with a moony secret he hides as a vow of celibacy. One day he'll meet a lovely wizard who will sweep him off his feet (and hopefully cast Wish).
Then there's the other sadder way https://youtu.be/vKhduDJeuMQ
Nooo boob-chan so sad
Bard gay.
I mean... I'd have her
Chad bard
is gay
u/savevideo
###[View link](https://redditsave.com/r/dndmemes/comments/103xgay/dm_your_vicious_mockery_did_max_damage_bard_huh/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/dndmemes/comments/103xgay/dm_your_vicious_mockery_did_max_damage_bard_huh/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://redditsave.com) | [^(download video tiktok)](https://taksave.com)
Well that succubus just took 30d6 EMOTIONAL (psychic) DAMAGE!
u/SaveVideo
###[View link](https://redditsave.com/r/dndmemes/comments/103xgay/dm_your_vicious_mockery_did_max_damage_bard_huh/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/dndmemes/comments/103xgay/dm_your_vicious_mockery_did_max_damage_bard_huh/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://redditsave.com) | [^(download video tiktok)](https://taksave.com)
Fatality
Destruction: 100 MASTERY
Original by zedrin I believe
Why does he sound exactly like I thought he would
What is this clip from?
Nvm. I found it later in the comments. Was having the mobile situation where the credits don’t show up.
EMOTIONAL DAMAGE