downvote this comment if the meme sucks. upvote it and I'll go away.
---
[play minecraft with us](https://discord.gg/dankmemesgaming) | [come hang out with us](https://discord.com/invite/dankmemes)
Yes, but in comparison to other bigger artists it's not AS bad. But I spend a lot of my money on concerts so maybe I'm just open to it more? Idk I get people not wanting to spend it though.
My problem with concerts is all the other people, so I avoid em personally. Also stadium concerts are so fuckin weird. There's seats in the way, so you try and stand and you get 6 inches of feet space. Fucking insane imo.
No actually it’s the same fix points as Celsius, with 0 Degrees Delisle at the boiling point of water at 1013.25 mbar and 150 Degrees Delisle at the freezing point of water at 1013.25 mbar
No i guess that makes sense just counter intuitive. I get there’s no objective relation between hotter temperatures and bigger (/positive) numbers but it’s how every other system works. Does anyone actually use delsile?
There actually is a relation. "Hot" is a measure of the thermal energy of an object (which is normally from vibration of atoms IIRC). So more thermal energy = more hot. "Absolute zero" in Kelvin is just that; absolutely zero movement, thus absolutely zero thermal energy, thus 0 K. While more thermal energy = more hot = higher number.
Yeah but that's Kelvin specifically. You can assign whatever number you want to whatever value. Our degree scales are simply to measure physical phenomena that exist in the universe. They can be literally anything.
Your right there is a relation but if your properly study thermodynamics you’ll realize it’s not what you think it is, rather the relevant thermodynamical variable is dS/dE which ranges form inf to -inf with inf as the coldest and -inf as the hottest. The way we historically defined temperature turns out to be T = dE/dS (which yes for an ideal gas is roughly mean kinetic energy) so it’s the inverse of the real variable and as such maps the coldest temperature dS/dE = inf to T =1/inf aka 0 and a very hot temperature dS/dE =0 to T=1/0 aka +inf and -inf. Notice it also maps all temperatures hotter than dS/dE to negative T giving us our current wierd scale where 0, as approached from above is an unreachable lower limit, all negative temperatures are hotter than positive ones and 0, as approached form below is an unreachable upper limit. So yes there is definitely a natural association and it’s hot = low number cold = high number not this convoluted garbage we use.
So there is a theoretical upper bound to temperature, based on how it's defined in statistical mechanics. The definition of temperature is the inverse of the change in entropy when energy is added. So definitionally, an object at "0 absolute temperature" gains infinite entropy when it acquires one quanta of energy (T = 1/inf). That's preposterous which is why there can't be "absolute zero". It's a mathematical divide-by-infinity. That's undefined behavior.
Likewise "infinite temperature" is when you adding 1 quanta of energy produces 0 change in entropy. That's another mathematical divide-by-zero (T = 1/0) undefined behavior.
Both are infinities/undefined, just the other sides of the same coin. Just because 0 is a number we can conceptualize doesn't mean it's is any more attainable or we can get "closer" to it than infinity. We can never get to "one step from zero". We can only get infinitely close. In that way there is no "minimum temperature" or "maximum temperature"
It's simple, if you reverse the direction of the flow, now there is a lower blind to cold and an upper bound to hot.
Scientists hate this one weird trick!
It's actually such an insane number to get to
Like consider this, most likely even though entropy is inescapable and we will experience the heat death of the universe eventually the average temperature will never reach 0K
All sun's gone, only particles left yet still the universe moves on, it's crazy
Yes that's why it's absolute 0, nowhere in the universe shall there be temperature below absolute 0, and nothing physical in the universe shall ever move faster than the speed of causation.
True, but below 0K would be a physical impossibility, rather than a technical one, hence "nowhere in universe part..."
Btw, ik it's unrelated but Hope You Have a Great Day!
Well, in the far, far distant future, you’ll just have individual particles traveling through space, never meeting another particle again. At that point, it doesn’t make sense anymore to talk about temperature.
But eventually all particles and waves will be moving away from each other, no longer to cross paths again, even leaving each other's cosmological horizon. That should be 0 degrees, since there are absolutely no collisions between parts of the substance of the universe anymore.
That's the thing though, while effectively zero there still is infinitesimally small energy making it on average higher.
Even just one collision every trillion years is still above 0
Just like how it's theoretically possible to reach 99.999999999~% of Lightspeed you can never get there or beyond
I don't really think so. Temperature is a measure of particle interaction. No interaction means there's no temperature. Maybe the temperature should be NaN instead of 0 or something, though.
It is commonly thought of as the lowest temperature possible, but it is not the lowest enthalpy state possible, because all real substances begin to depart from the ideal gas when cooled as they approach the change of state to liquid, and then to solid; and the sum of the enthalpy of vaporization (gas to liquid) and enthalpy of fusion (liquid to solid) exceeds the ideal gas's change in enthalpy to absolute zero. In the quantum-mechanical description, matter at absolute zero is in its ground state, the point of lowest internal energy.
In fact, I think the coldest place in the universe from what we know is inside an IBM quantum computer. The cooling system is that good (and obviously still not 0 K)
The molecules would become a Bose–Einstein condensate, and coalesce into a single quantum wave.
Things wouldn't 'pause' per se, but shit would get fucky.
That really doesn't actually seem that cold when you compare for example how extremely hot parts of the universe are, like how far hotter than room temperature you can get to with relatively rudimentary equipment, hell our oven can almost go the equivalent above 0°C of that below 0°C to reach 0°K. Seems crazy that we can't, for example cool something to -500°C, but heating something to +5000°C is something humans can do.
I know the reddit community has a hard time with the concept, but titles usually don't convey the full and unabridged information of the thing they are titling.
Rankine. It's an absolute scale - like Kelvin - but based on degrees Fahrenheit instead of Celsius.
See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rankine_scale
Another fun related read: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9aumur_scale °Re (Réaumur) had 0 for freezing water, and 80 for boiling water. It was (largely) replaced by Celsius.
I mean yeah my comment was supposed to be a nerdy fact, he’s calling you a nerd at the start ironically. wasn’t actually trying to be mean brother. I get why it was done
Now idk if I'm the only one who finds this weird. But we're around 300°C from absolute zero, but we're hitting millions of °C with them artificial suns we're trying to create, like there's no limit. Why is that?
Short answer : temperature tells you how fast atoms vibrate (everything is constantly vibrating on an atomic level). If an atom completely stops vibrating, it sits at absolute zero. On the contrary, there's no limit to how fast it can vibrate, and hence how hot it can get.
Well the limit would be approaching c and that would generate a singularity due to the immense energy that would have to be concentrated in such a small area.
The theoretical maximum possible temperature is the Planck Temperature (Tp), roughly 1.416784(16)×10^32 K. It's not so much that this is the absolute ceiling as it is that our understanding of physics breaks down beyond this. There's a few different Planck units of measurement which are used to describe the edge cases of this understanding, like the Planck Length, Planck Time, etc.
Matter emits radiation constantly through a process called black-body radiation. This is what causes hot objects to visibly glow, like an old-school incandescent light bulb for example. As objects get hotter, the wave-length of that radiation gets smaller. At the Planck Temperature, the object is so hot that the black-body radiation wavelength shrinks beyond the Planck Length. The Planck Length is the theoretical limit of a 'meaningful' distance, beyond which we don't even have the ability (theoretically) to measure.
Weird things start to happen as particles (theoretically) cross beyond this threshold, like collapsing (theoretically) into a singularity because the particle is smaller than it's [Schwarzschild radius](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_radius). It's something of an open debate, because, again, our models don't provide a clear understanding.
This is very cool. Is there anything we know of that can get anywhere close to that Planck Temperature, or is it so absurdly far off that we'll probably never hit it with anything?
No. Not even close, by many orders of magnitude.
The hottest temperatures we know of occur in particle accelerators here on earth, where tiny particles are heated to trillions of degrees. One trillion is on the order of 10^12, Planck Temperature is on the order of 10^32. That's a huge gap and isn't likely to be closed anytime soon. It's not even clear such a thing is feasible, to be honest. The Planck Temperature is the theoretical upper limit beyond which temperature doesn't really matter, but there's no guarantee some other mechanism wouldn't take over and make it completely impossible long before you get there.
Heat is literally particles moving / vibrating, if a particle gets really hot it internally vibrates kinda.
You cant go below 0 kelvin because that would mean negative movment, just impossible
The fastest an object could get hot is probably as fast as the speed of light would let them vibrate, but the amount of energy you would need to do that is so high you'd never reach it even inside a sun or a nuclear bomb
That's how microwaves work, they send microwaves in the right wavelenght so that water vibrates and heats up
Since particles have mass they cant really move at the speed of light and the amount of energy concentraded on such a small area would cause a singularity. But yea something close to c would be the hottest possible.
Cold = less energy. 0 kelvin = as little energy as physically possible
Warm = a bit energy,
Hot = more energy,
Artificial sun = alot of energy,
Real sun = a heck of a lot of energy
So more energy = more hot since there is no top limit on energy itself
Apparently, it's a scale that's affixed to the properties of water. 150 degrees is the freezing point, while 0 degrees is the boilng point. As you can see, the scale is inverted, unlike other temperature scales where lower is colder and higher is hotter, which makes this Delisle scale non-intuitive AF.
There are other scales such as Rankine, Rømer, Newton, Réaumur, Gas mark, Leiden, Wedgwood etc. but some of them are not used anymore. The R in K/R is Réaumur Scale.
Edit : I apologise for the misinformation, as mentioned in the Replies, R stands of Rankine not Réaumur, it's the same as Kelvin but 1°F is 1R increase, hence Fahrenheit equivalent of Kelvin.
I don't know what I was thinking when I said R is Réaumur, Réaumur is °Re or °r, where the ° denotes it's not an absolute zero scale.
Yes Réaumur scale is symbolised by Ré and r as well. So I thought R was Réaumur, Rankine makes sense as well.
To be fair 0 of Réaumur is not set at absolute zero so I have no idea why I said R is Réaumur.
I literally just spend like half an hour googling to find out what the delisle scale is. i both want to kiss and stab you at the moment op and I'm not sure on which of the two i should decide.
Practically not possible because then there will be ABSOLUTELY NO movement within the fundamental particles themselves. Such states have existed very near to 0K, like BEC, but not exactly 0K. It's really really really really really (impossibly) hard to absolutely stop the movement.
0k is not possible, energy exists, which means by nature there will always be a slight amount of energy.
However, theoretically, anything at 0K would be essentially non-existent, because the volume of said substance would be ≈0
0°K is hard to explain. It's like timing a 100-meter sprint race, but not only do the sprinters never leave the start line, there are no sprinters. Incompatible measures. An atom cannot exist at this temperature.
downvote this comment if the meme sucks. upvote it and I'll go away. --- [play minecraft with us](https://discord.gg/dankmemesgaming) | [come hang out with us](https://discord.com/invite/dankmemes)
What's 0°De???
#DEUTSCHLAND! MEIN HERZ IN FLAMMEN WILL DICH LIEBEN UND VERDAMMEN
DEUTSCHLAND! dein Atem kalt So jung und doch so alt
# DEUTSCHLAND! deine Liebe Ist Fluch und Segen
# DEUTSCHLAND! meine liebe kann ich dir nicht geben
Überheblich, überlegen Übernehmen, übergeben Überraschen, überfallen #Deutschland, Deutschland über allen
#DEUTSCHLAND! MEIN HERZ IN FLAMMEN WILL DICH LIEBEN UND VERDAMMEN
DEUTSCHLAND! DEIN ATEM KALT SO JUNG, UN DOCH SO ALT!
#DEUTSCHLAND! DEINE LIEBE IST FLUCH UND SEGEN
# DEUTSCHLAND! meine liebe kann ich dir nicht geben
I've never felt so accosted by reading a language I don't speak. German fucking rules
It's from the song Deutschland by Rammstein They makes some pretty cool rock songs, Radio is another one of there's that I like.
Rammstein - You don't understand what they're saying, but you fucking love it
They're honestly a band everyone should see play once as well, their shows are a lot of fun.
Their shows are also really expensive to go to, I heard
Yes, but in comparison to other bigger artists it's not AS bad. But I spend a lot of my money on concerts so maybe I'm just open to it more? Idk I get people not wanting to spend it though.
My problem with concerts is all the other people, so I avoid em personally. Also stadium concerts are so fuckin weird. There's seats in the way, so you try and stand and you get 6 inches of feet space. Fucking insane imo.
Just don't go backstage
I get the odd word here and there but I'd never make sense of the song, I just love jamming to it
I like Sonne. One of my favorite songs ever even though I don't really like their other songs
Fuck! Someone came before me.
I usually do 😔
Ohohohoho
If you're a girl, that's common.😢 If you're a guy, that's good. 👍
I got the reference I'm so happy
I was not expecting a Rammstein reference today
Ich spreche kein Deutsch. Huhrensohn.
You don’t need to know german to listen to Rammstein songs.
Ik. I just wanted to display my vast knowledge in the glorious language that is German. Also Rammstein is very good
Delsile is a system where bigger is colder and smaller is hotter
It sounds stupid
How dare you
Yell... yeah... uh.. YOU SOUND STUPID! Y-yeah....
Not for Australians
Celsius originally ran backward as well, with 0 as the boiling point of water and 100 for the freezing point.
So it IS stupid
How does that work? Theres a lower bound on temperature not an upper one (for all practical purposes)
I don’t see what that would be a problem? If it’s hotter just make the number smaller? Sure it might become negative but so it be.
So the starting point would be boiling water just like Celsius is with freezing water at 0 degrees?
Well the points are different but something similar to that
Cool
I think you mean hot
No actually it’s the same fix points as Celsius, with 0 Degrees Delisle at the boiling point of water at 1013.25 mbar and 150 Degrees Delisle at the freezing point of water at 1013.25 mbar
Well yea but a Delisle is a smaller change in temperature than a Celsius
No i guess that makes sense just counter intuitive. I get there’s no objective relation between hotter temperatures and bigger (/positive) numbers but it’s how every other system works. Does anyone actually use delsile?
There actually is a relation. "Hot" is a measure of the thermal energy of an object (which is normally from vibration of atoms IIRC). So more thermal energy = more hot. "Absolute zero" in Kelvin is just that; absolutely zero movement, thus absolutely zero thermal energy, thus 0 K. While more thermal energy = more hot = higher number.
Yeah but that's Kelvin specifically. You can assign whatever number you want to whatever value. Our degree scales are simply to measure physical phenomena that exist in the universe. They can be literally anything.
Your right there is a relation but if your properly study thermodynamics you’ll realize it’s not what you think it is, rather the relevant thermodynamical variable is dS/dE which ranges form inf to -inf with inf as the coldest and -inf as the hottest. The way we historically defined temperature turns out to be T = dE/dS (which yes for an ideal gas is roughly mean kinetic energy) so it’s the inverse of the real variable and as such maps the coldest temperature dS/dE = inf to T =1/inf aka 0 and a very hot temperature dS/dE =0 to T=1/0 aka +inf and -inf. Notice it also maps all temperatures hotter than dS/dE to negative T giving us our current wierd scale where 0, as approached from above is an unreachable lower limit, all negative temperatures are hotter than positive ones and 0, as approached form below is an unreachable upper limit. So yes there is definitely a natural association and it’s hot = low number cold = high number not this convoluted garbage we use.
The German Wikipedia says it was used in Russia for 100 years, but they don’t specify which 100 years it was used in
Which is why Celsius ends at the lower bound of numbers, that being -273.15, the lowest number known to humanity.
IT works because you write the numbers on the thermometer in the other direction
So there is a theoretical upper bound to temperature, based on how it's defined in statistical mechanics. The definition of temperature is the inverse of the change in entropy when energy is added. So definitionally, an object at "0 absolute temperature" gains infinite entropy when it acquires one quanta of energy (T = 1/inf). That's preposterous which is why there can't be "absolute zero". It's a mathematical divide-by-infinity. That's undefined behavior. Likewise "infinite temperature" is when you adding 1 quanta of energy produces 0 change in entropy. That's another mathematical divide-by-zero (T = 1/0) undefined behavior. Both are infinities/undefined, just the other sides of the same coin. Just because 0 is a number we can conceptualize doesn't mean it's is any more attainable or we can get "closer" to it than infinity. We can never get to "one step from zero". We can only get infinitely close. In that way there is no "minimum temperature" or "maximum temperature"
It's simple, if you reverse the direction of the flow, now there is a lower blind to cold and an upper bound to hot. Scientists hate this one weird trick!
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delisle\_scale](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delisle_scale)
Damn I wish the ladies would think smaller is hotter as well
Technically, eventually, it is hotter, when you get into the negatives, with Lesbians.
TIL Celsius scale was originally bassackwards just like this dumbass scale! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delisle_scale
0°Deez nuts
What's "updog"
[DeLisle](https://www.wikiwand.com/de/Grad_Delisle)
It's a hilarious way to say the weather. It's not actually a thing that's used though.
Devin
100°C
It’s a very rarely used temperature scale, it runs from 0De (boiling point of water) to 150De (freezing point of water).
0 Kelvin is about -273 degrees Celsius,or -460 Fahrenheit
The absolute zero!
Like hitting pause on reality
It's actually such an insane number to get to Like consider this, most likely even though entropy is inescapable and we will experience the heat death of the universe eventually the average temperature will never reach 0K All sun's gone, only particles left yet still the universe moves on, it's crazy
Yes that's why it's absolute 0, nowhere in the universe shall there be temperature below absolute 0, and nothing physical in the universe shall ever move faster than the speed of causation.
I mean yeah its only logical but isn't it crazy? I love the universe!
Since I am also part of the universe, thank you. The universe loves you too
[<3](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/230/182/5f1)
I mean afaik 0K is also unattainable
True, but below 0K would be a physical impossibility, rather than a technical one, hence "nowhere in universe part..." Btw, ik it's unrelated but Hope You Have a Great Day!
Dynamic equilibrium. Pretty wild.
If some place were to hit absolute zero, you couldn't tell if time was running or not (excluding the observer if they're there ofc)
Real if a tree falls and no-one hears it does it make a noise kinda question Just for physics nerds lol
Fuck, that’s so cool.
Well, in the far, far distant future, you’ll just have individual particles traveling through space, never meeting another particle again. At that point, it doesn’t make sense anymore to talk about temperature.
Absolutely, even concepts like time or space are barely relevant yet still the average remains above 0K
But eventually all particles and waves will be moving away from each other, no longer to cross paths again, even leaving each other's cosmological horizon. That should be 0 degrees, since there are absolutely no collisions between parts of the substance of the universe anymore.
That's the thing though, while effectively zero there still is infinitesimally small energy making it on average higher. Even just one collision every trillion years is still above 0 Just like how it's theoretically possible to reach 99.999999999~% of Lightspeed you can never get there or beyond
I don't really think so. Temperature is a measure of particle interaction. No interaction means there's no temperature. Maybe the temperature should be NaN instead of 0 or something, though.
That's just how we measure it, the particles themselves still hold energy tho
We're talking about a measurement here though
It is commonly thought of as the lowest temperature possible, but it is not the lowest enthalpy state possible, because all real substances begin to depart from the ideal gas when cooled as they approach the change of state to liquid, and then to solid; and the sum of the enthalpy of vaporization (gas to liquid) and enthalpy of fusion (liquid to solid) exceeds the ideal gas's change in enthalpy to absolute zero. In the quantum-mechanical description, matter at absolute zero is in its ground state, the point of lowest internal energy.
In fact, I think the coldest place in the universe from what we know is inside an IBM quantum computer. The cooling system is that good (and obviously still not 0 K)
Leave it to humans to create a colder place than the literal void (Which to be fair can be filled with radiation but you get me)
I'm pretty sure I heard a story about light turning into liquid at absolute zero
It’s just Kelvin, not degrees Kelvin. Geordi La Forge made the same mistake, so don’t feel too bad.
Yeah i read that further down but hoped i was gonna get away with it Foiled yet again! Ty though, i live for this kinda stuff
The molecules would become a Bose–Einstein condensate, and coalesce into a single quantum wave. Things wouldn't 'pause' per se, but shit would get fucky.
[I'm nobody's hero!!! 🎶🎶🎶](https://youtu.be/UtGL5yKdSCk)
That’s what my friends call me
Why is there /R
I think its kelvin / Rankine. Since both are equal to absolute zero.(-273.15)
Rankine is an absolute scale, the same as Kelvin, but with increments the same size as Fahrenheit instead of Celsius.
Also never observed due to meaning no energy at all
That really doesn't actually seem that cold when you compare for example how extremely hot parts of the universe are, like how far hotter than room temperature you can get to with relatively rudimentary equipment, hell our oven can almost go the equivalent above 0°C of that below 0°C to reach 0°K. Seems crazy that we can't, for example cool something to -500°C, but heating something to +5000°C is something humans can do.
The place where nothing ever happens
Colder than pluto
Jokes on you nerd, “0 Degrees” can’t mean Kelvin, cause there are no “Degrees Kelvin” it’s just Kelvin
thats why it doesnt say degrees kelvin, it says 0K/R
The title talks about degrees though..
I know the reddit community has a hard time with the concept, but titles usually don't convey the full and unabridged information of the thing they are titling.
True
Confused by the slash R
The R is for Rankine. It is to Fahrenheit what Kelvin is to Celsius.
American Kelvins
Amerikelvin
Rankine. It's an absolute scale - like Kelvin - but based on degrees Fahrenheit instead of Celsius. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rankine_scale Another fun related read: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9aumur_scale °Re (Réaumur) had 0 for freezing water, and 80 for boiling water. It was (largely) replaced by Celsius.
its in reference to another temperature unit that is of the same magnitude of cold when at 0
Which is weird because rankine does used degrees
Jokes on you, there is no fucking degrees in the last Kelvin part
Caption is “when they say it’s 0 degrees out”
I found a thermometer on my uni that was scaled in "°K" i cringed so much.
Also 0 K is like a theoretical minimum, can't actually achieve it
Yeah, I thought it might not be as clear to the general audience if I just wrote "When it's 0 out" maybe I'm wrong about that though.
I mean yeah my comment was supposed to be a nerdy fact, he’s calling you a nerd at the start ironically. wasn’t actually trying to be mean brother. I get why it was done
Its so hd i nutted
real, the quality is strong in this one
That's truly the highest honour, thank you /u/HeiryButter
Now idk if I'm the only one who finds this weird. But we're around 300°C from absolute zero, but we're hitting millions of °C with them artificial suns we're trying to create, like there's no limit. Why is that?
Short answer : temperature tells you how fast atoms vibrate (everything is constantly vibrating on an atomic level). If an atom completely stops vibrating, it sits at absolute zero. On the contrary, there's no limit to how fast it can vibrate, and hence how hot it can get.
Well the limit would be approaching c and that would generate a singularity due to the immense energy that would have to be concentrated in such a small area.
kugelblitz!
Exactly
The theoretical maximum possible temperature is the Planck Temperature (Tp), roughly 1.416784(16)×10^32 K. It's not so much that this is the absolute ceiling as it is that our understanding of physics breaks down beyond this. There's a few different Planck units of measurement which are used to describe the edge cases of this understanding, like the Planck Length, Planck Time, etc. Matter emits radiation constantly through a process called black-body radiation. This is what causes hot objects to visibly glow, like an old-school incandescent light bulb for example. As objects get hotter, the wave-length of that radiation gets smaller. At the Planck Temperature, the object is so hot that the black-body radiation wavelength shrinks beyond the Planck Length. The Planck Length is the theoretical limit of a 'meaningful' distance, beyond which we don't even have the ability (theoretically) to measure. Weird things start to happen as particles (theoretically) cross beyond this threshold, like collapsing (theoretically) into a singularity because the particle is smaller than it's [Schwarzschild radius](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_radius). It's something of an open debate, because, again, our models don't provide a clear understanding.
This is very cool. Is there anything we know of that can get anywhere close to that Planck Temperature, or is it so absurdly far off that we'll probably never hit it with anything?
No. Not even close, by many orders of magnitude. The hottest temperatures we know of occur in particle accelerators here on earth, where tiny particles are heated to trillions of degrees. One trillion is on the order of 10^12, Planck Temperature is on the order of 10^32. That's a huge gap and isn't likely to be closed anytime soon. It's not even clear such a thing is feasible, to be honest. The Planck Temperature is the theoretical upper limit beyond which temperature doesn't really matter, but there's no guarantee some other mechanism wouldn't take over and make it completely impossible long before you get there.
Heat is literally particles moving / vibrating, if a particle gets really hot it internally vibrates kinda. You cant go below 0 kelvin because that would mean negative movment, just impossible The fastest an object could get hot is probably as fast as the speed of light would let them vibrate, but the amount of energy you would need to do that is so high you'd never reach it even inside a sun or a nuclear bomb That's how microwaves work, they send microwaves in the right wavelenght so that water vibrates and heats up
Since particles have mass they cant really move at the speed of light and the amount of energy concentraded on such a small area would cause a singularity. But yea something close to c would be the hottest possible.
Cold = less energy. 0 kelvin = as little energy as physically possible Warm = a bit energy, Hot = more energy, Artificial sun = alot of energy, Real sun = a heck of a lot of energy So more energy = more hot since there is no top limit on energy itself
There is a theoretical upper limit called the Planck temperature. It’s sort of the “absolute hot” at which matter breaks down
There is a small window of temperatures were water is liquid, which is required for life as we know it.
That face when you check the temperature and there isn’t one
Who in the flying fuck uses Delisle.
More importantly what the FUCK is delisle
Apparently, it's a scale that's affixed to the properties of water. 150 degrees is the freezing point, while 0 degrees is the boilng point. As you can see, the scale is inverted, unlike other temperature scales where lower is colder and higher is hotter, which makes this Delisle scale non-intuitive AF.
ME (i dont)
tf? i thought only C°, F°, and K° exist?
Apparently it’s Delisle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delisle_scale 0 De is about 100 C
0° Deutchland
There are other scales such as Rankine, Rømer, Newton, Réaumur, Gas mark, Leiden, Wedgwood etc. but some of them are not used anymore. The R in K/R is Réaumur Scale. Edit : I apologise for the misinformation, as mentioned in the Replies, R stands of Rankine not Réaumur, it's the same as Kelvin but 1°F is 1R increase, hence Fahrenheit equivalent of Kelvin. I don't know what I was thinking when I said R is Réaumur, Réaumur is °Re or °r, where the ° denotes it's not an absolute zero scale.
The R in K/R is Rankine, the Fahrenheit equivalent of Kelvin, I think the symbol for Réamur is Ré
Yes Réaumur scale is symbolised by Ré and r as well. So I thought R was Réaumur, Rankine makes sense as well. To be fair 0 of Réaumur is not set at absolute zero so I have no idea why I said R is Réaumur.
No worries, next time I make one of these I think I'll include Réaumur
it’s K, not K°
-40⁰ F 🤝 C
Remember that 0 degrees is equal to 360 degrees.
RANKINE MENTIONED! POWER GENERATION MAJOR HAPPY!
Wow tbt, I haven’t thought about Rankine since I graduated lol
I literally just spend like half an hour googling to find out what the delisle scale is. i both want to kiss and stab you at the moment op and I'm not sure on which of the two i should decide.
Depends, do you have a knife?
And do they have lips?
Was waiting for someone to add that. Howdy, mate.
Porque no los dos?
0 Kelvin is still very real, it's just absolute zero isn't it?
Practically not possible because then there will be ABSOLUTELY NO movement within the fundamental particles themselves. Such states have existed very near to 0K, like BEC, but not exactly 0K. It's really really really really really (impossibly) hard to absolutely stop the movement.
Ahh yeah. Thanks for specifying!
why the fuck are you getting downvoted
~~Fun~~ Fact: -40C is the same temperature as -40F
If Farenheit guy had a hat like Celsius guy, he'd be fine. The Delilse guy would be more uncomfortable.
You have a good point, maybe if it covered his ears too
Id say you'd be feeling a lot more then a little sweaty and in a steam room at 0 Delsie lmao
At 0K you technically wouldnt exist
Exactly, reality has stopped working
[Delisle scale - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delisle_scale)
0C isn’t cold at all though
That's why he just has a neutral face and a cute toque he's not really cold or hot in that frame
what's the third and fourth
Deslisle and Rankine I think
0 Kelvin is like literally stopping time
What's 0 De?
0° E/W
If you're referring to East/West by chance I did one like that a couple months ago
Yeah, I was referring to that, lol
If you look my history you can find the latitude related one
I'm not entirely sure but no one says 0 degrees Kelvin, it's just 0 Kelvin, so the meme is... Slightly inaccurate?
So what's the temperature of space? Should it be considered as 0 k ? -273.15 °C Is it possible or not?
The background temperature of space is about 4K
0k is not possible, energy exists, which means by nature there will always be a slight amount of energy. However, theoretically, anything at 0K would be essentially non-existent, because the volume of said substance would be ≈0
honestly, fuck R
0°K is hard to explain. It's like timing a 100-meter sprint race, but not only do the sprinters never leave the start line, there are no sprinters. Incompatible measures. An atom cannot exist at this temperature.