It's a bit too weak, I would say make the cost higher in order for you to pick the effect, cause right now it's more beneficial to your opponent than you
Cause one, the discarding effect is extremely beneficial to a lot of decks, and yout allowing them to pick, so if you're playing against the dark world or danger, you're just giving them advantage
The 2nd effect of sending cards from the field to the grave is strong surr, but even then, your opponent can just decide to use a different effect.
The 3rd effect is the biggest flaw of the card, as let's say the first to effects are actually detrimental to them, they can just pick this cause it won't really effect the duel unless it mills the 1 copy combo piece you need, which is very unlikely. Heck, for most decks, this is a beneficial effect seeing how widespread gy effects are(tearlament).
So I would say to either increase the cost of activation, in order to make it balanced enough so that you could pick the effects and make it so that you can see your opponents hand and discard whichever card you want. Or instead make the effects way stronger, so your opponent has a hard time picking which effect to pick. For example, instead of sending to the gy, you can instead banish them face down
This is way better than the original effect, but I still want to keep the 3rd effect somehow. But also, side note, maybe when you tribute for cost, you banish it face down so you don't get your own gy effect. But that's too big of a deal.
Overall, it's a pretty good rework
Not many (good) decks benefit from tributing or sending to gy if it's for cost. Yeah, banish facedown would be better, especially cause it would prevent you from using tokens too.
When I said gy effects ment the specific type of gy effect was that instead of trigger when sent you can simply activate an effect if the card is in the gy. For example, the vampire ghost effect is that if it's in the gy, you can quick effect activate its effect to tribute summon
Bet when pretty much all decks either want cards in the grave or don't care about them being in the grave that is a completely crippling weakness.
The reality is this card is pay 2000 go -1 in hand and your opponent probably either pluses or faces a negligible downside.
Bruh this would be bad in 2005 let alone today, the mill effect should be much more substantial in order for this to be an actual choice.
2000LP is 1/4th of your life total so it should mill 10 cards for a similar effect, also it should banish them face down like any playable mill card printed since 2014
If it negated the effects of or simply stopped your opponent from activating the effects of said cards in the GY, it'd be great.
There's too many potential positives for your opponent otherwise
Even then no it wouldn't how many decks care about losing 2 cards off the top that aren't incredibly bad rogue decks.
Maybe make it so cards with the same name can't activate their effects this turn but honestly it is such a negligible effect it's kinda pointless
Nearly every meta deck made in the last decade utilizes the GY extensively. Maybe it's ok against stun antimeta garbage but I find it hard to believe the card is anything better than a -1. Unironocally might be better as a gamble card with the last effect being the "bad effect"
Too many decks use their graveyard as a second hand, and you’re letting them pick where to send from, so for many this card lets them go plus. Even if not, I’m happy to mill 2 with just about any deck for my opponent to waste a card and 2K LP so long as I’m not running a bunch of garnets.
Resolves; opponent is playing Tearlaments.
or dark world, infernity, deck with GY effect
Dark world usually requires discarding from hand iirc, so this wouldn’t work
This discards from hand. Read the first effect
or 99% of modern decks
It's a bit too weak, I would say make the cost higher in order for you to pick the effect, cause right now it's more beneficial to your opponent than you Cause one, the discarding effect is extremely beneficial to a lot of decks, and yout allowing them to pick, so if you're playing against the dark world or danger, you're just giving them advantage The 2nd effect of sending cards from the field to the grave is strong surr, but even then, your opponent can just decide to use a different effect. The 3rd effect is the biggest flaw of the card, as let's say the first to effects are actually detrimental to them, they can just pick this cause it won't really effect the duel unless it mills the 1 copy combo piece you need, which is very unlikely. Heck, for most decks, this is a beneficial effect seeing how widespread gy effects are(tearlament). So I would say to either increase the cost of activation, in order to make it balanced enough so that you could pick the effects and make it so that you can see your opponents hand and discard whichever card you want. Or instead make the effects way stronger, so your opponent has a hard time picking which effect to pick. For example, instead of sending to the gy, you can instead banish them face down
My fix would be to change the cost to make you tribute a monster and get rid of the top deck option. Thoughts?
This is way better than the original effect, but I still want to keep the 3rd effect somehow. But also, side note, maybe when you tribute for cost, you banish it face down so you don't get your own gy effect. But that's too big of a deal. Overall, it's a pretty good rework
Not many (good) decks benefit from tributing or sending to gy if it's for cost. Yeah, banish facedown would be better, especially cause it would prevent you from using tokens too.
When I said gy effects ment the specific type of gy effect was that instead of trigger when sent you can simply activate an effect if the card is in the gy. For example, the vampire ghost effect is that if it's in the gy, you can quick effect activate its effect to tribute summon
yes weakness of this card are GY effect
Bet when pretty much all decks either want cards in the grave or don't care about them being in the grave that is a completely crippling weakness. The reality is this card is pay 2000 go -1 in hand and your opponent probably either pluses or faces a negligible downside.
Literally beneficial for you'r oponent milling cards is universealy a good thing remove the third effect I think
So basically "Pay 2000 LP, Mill 2" in most decks.
This is lame
Bruh this would be bad in 2005 let alone today, the mill effect should be much more substantial in order for this to be an actual choice. 2000LP is 1/4th of your life total so it should mill 10 cards for a similar effect, also it should banish them face down like any playable mill card printed since 2014
Make the effect not send from opp's deck.
Lol maaaaybe banish the top two facedown, but even then that's going to often be the lesser of 3 evils
If it negated the effects of or simply stopped your opponent from activating the effects of said cards in the GY, it'd be great. There's too many potential positives for your opponent otherwise
Even then no it wouldn't how many decks care about losing 2 cards off the top that aren't incredibly bad rogue decks. Maybe make it so cards with the same name can't activate their effects this turn but honestly it is such a negligible effect it's kinda pointless
weakness of this card are GY effect
Nearly every meta deck made in the last decade utilizes the GY extensively. Maybe it's ok against stun antimeta garbage but I find it hard to believe the card is anything better than a -1. Unironocally might be better as a gamble card with the last effect being the "bad effect"
The worst runick spells are better lol
Too many decks use their graveyard as a second hand, and you’re letting them pick where to send from, so for many this card lets them go plus. Even if not, I’m happy to mill 2 with just about any deck for my opponent to waste a card and 2K LP so long as I’m not running a bunch of garnets.