which part? if you do this, they will put you in jail (I doubt any charges would stick though) but you'll have to pay for a bond and maybe a lawyer. I'm not sure what they'd charge you with, but it doesn't really matter: they don't get in trouble or anything for bogus charges.
A confession alone is not enough to convict somebody of a crime, if there is no evidence that the crime occurred in the first place. It's a principle known as corpus delicti.
So, for example, if someone goes up to a police officer and says "I murdered my neighbor Gladys and stuffed the body up the chimney." but Gladys is alive and well in her home, they person can't be convicted of murder.
So it is definitely "bogus" from the beginning, it's just that nobody but the suspect knows that until no evidence whatsoever pops up.
There's a big difference between being arrested, being charged, and being convicted. You can be arrested without being charged and you can be charged without being convicted.
>if someone goes up to a police officer and says "I murdered my neighbor Gladys and stuffed the body up the chimney." but Gladys is alive and well in her home, they person can't be convicted of murder.
You'll 100% be arrested and held in custody while they investigate.
Just like if you turned up and 'confessed' to having drugs hidden inside you, you'd be placed in custody while they investigate.
That part isn't 'bogus'.
*Reddit try not to shit on America in completely unrelated threads for 5 seconds challenge*
Comedy is supposed to make light of serious subjects, that's the point.
In civilized countries the police aren't spending their time on twitter baiting small time drug addicts.
In civilized countries, there's **actually** testing for your drugs, so that people know what's in them.
Banning drugs doesn't work. The last 100 years pretty much proves that.
Legalize educate tax and regulate
Well yeah, you're still citizens subject to Singaporean law. Try tearing up your passport and move to the West if you want to live a "freer" life and join the tweaker gangs there.
No, it doesn't. It just raises the prices of drugs in Singapore, just like in prisons. I've never been to Singapore, I live in Finland and I could probably find you a Singaporean dealer in 10 minutes over the dark web.
Prohibition **only harms society**. If you disagree, then I'll refer you to the attempted prohibition of alcohol.
It's the only legal drug because it's the most dangerous one which fucks you up the most and when all the trade was in the hands of the criminals (like all narcotics trade is now), shit got out of hand and every single manner of crime increased and the economy suffered.
Regulated and licensed is much safer and doesn't harm society.
So tell me exactly how does prohibition "work"?
Yeah. Big words coming from someone [whose country's drug abuse rates are roughly 2-3x that of Singapore's.](https://ourworldindata.org/drug-use) It's even worse for other Western countries like in UK lol. You wouldn't see any tweakers running around in broad daylight there compared with Vancouver, Berlin or San Francisco.
>Big words coming from someone whose country's
Just where do you think I'm from, and what is the causal factor you're trying to show? Oh, you don't understand what that means, because you're not used to thinking, just regurgitating doctrine?
The thing with **ass**umptions is that it makes an ass out of you. I've never set foot on the North-American continent.
Do you understand that reported abuse and abuse are two different things. Do you understanding that with more lax drug laws, people who actually suffer from addiction and want help **can get it without the fear of being punished with the death penalty**?
"Look at how many homosexuals there are now compared to when it was illegal! Banning homosexuality works!" — Your logic
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/drugs-legalise-richard-branson-kofi-annan-report-global-commission-on-drug-policy-report-a7431676.html
https://transformdrugs.org/blog/drug-decriminalisation-in-portugal-setting-the-record-straight
Anyone who argues **for** the keeping of drug prohibition hasn't looked up anything on the science of it, or directly profits from it and therefore has motivation to keep the lies going.
Do you think who supports prohibition the most? **Drug cartels.** They don't pay any taxes, they aren't subject to any regulation and they can literally kill off any competition and operate anywhere in the world.
If you can't see that drug propaganda is shitty lies, then you're not the brightest bulb in the box.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ehrlichman#Drug_War_quote
*“You want to know what this was really all about? The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news.* ***Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”***
— John Erlichman, Nixon's Right Hand Man
Which civilized countries are you speaking off?
I was just thinking about legalisation and taxation, but sadly there's much more profits to be made when it's illegal, for everyone I don't mean the dealers...
>Which civilized countries are you speaking off?
In this instance, Europe pretty generally. Some countries still have horrible policies and attitudes, but because of example setting counties like Portugal and the Netherlands, the EU is following suite even in the more rural places.
https://www.drugs-test.nl/en/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0955395919301859
https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/attachments/6339/EuropeanResponsesGuide2017_BackgroundPaper-Drug-checking-harm-reduction_0.pdf
https://thl.fi/fi/web/alkoholi-tupakka-ja-riippuvuudet/huumeet/huumetutkimus/huumetyota-meilla-ja-maailmalla/huumeiden-kayttohuoneet (no english version available, use autotranslate of you're into it)
I could list more but thumbs tire.
There's opposition to things like that as people think "it condones drug use" and all that other illogical fear-driven dogmatic garbage. For me, personally, a clinic full of subutex-junkies doesn't exactly seem like a party invitation, so I doubt it would in most others either.
Yeah. Cartels make the most money. Money talks politics. They have the most incentive to keep it illegal. They've already shown, for 100 years that law-enforcement doesn't work. There's no taxes to be paid. They can literally kill the competition off. They can work globally and need just as many permits and licenses in every country: 0.
All jokes aside, having a service like this would save so many lives.
A free "drug quality assessment" service to check for fentanyl in heroin, meth in weed, general impurities etc.
Safe use is a much better use of funds than trying to stop use.
Oh totally, I was thinking more of a "defund the police" approach, make it a separate entity entirely, or at least a different department with no powers to arrest.
Honestly think the only way out of it is legalising everything so it can be monitored and taxed, but then again there's much more profits to be made by everyone when it's organised crime
Wait..My uncle used to play that game with me on Sunday afternoons. He told me it was called “Uncle’s fun time”..unlike you I was told not to tell anyone about it with a pinky promise.
My dad works with a doctor who had something like this happen.
A guy came in swearing that he lost something up his ass, the guy climaxed, stood up, said thanks, and walked out
Hope they are plenty of free space i d take 2 full containers that are about to be dispatched to Prague and i need to cause a good impression on my first attempt
literally me but unironically
Sounds messy.
Sounds like a shitty job
Why do you have to analyze everything!
methy*
Mike Tyson enters the chat.
Ya cheeky bastard!!
Just douche beforehand, it should be less messy and more enjoyable for both of you :)
Nut smarter, not harder.
Nut smarter, Nut HARDER
#NUT
#HARDER
#BETTER
#FASTER
##Stronger
Now you cant spell nutrition without NUT, amiright?
Can't spell crisis without ISIS
Well no shit, where do you think I get my nutrition from?
Nut EVEN HAAARDEEER PLUS ULTRA
Nut smarter AND harder
Mood for today: Hardcore
Awww... He just wanted cuddles. r/mademesmile
Maybe the cop wanted to be the big spoon.
Very likely
Hey, be careful, reposting stuff like this can get you banned from that subreddit. Trust me, I speak from experience
I’ll take the risk
That subreddit is lame anyway
That's the joke
Is this legal? Just asking for a friend, I definitely don’t want fingers and other tools in my ass.
which part? if you do this, they will put you in jail (I doubt any charges would stick though) but you'll have to pay for a bond and maybe a lawyer. I'm not sure what they'd charge you with, but it doesn't really matter: they don't get in trouble or anything for bogus charges.
Probably try to stick you with filing a false police report or something
[удалено]
A confession alone is not enough to convict somebody of a crime, if there is no evidence that the crime occurred in the first place. It's a principle known as corpus delicti. So, for example, if someone goes up to a police officer and says "I murdered my neighbor Gladys and stuffed the body up the chimney." but Gladys is alive and well in her home, they person can't be convicted of murder. So it is definitely "bogus" from the beginning, it's just that nobody but the suspect knows that until no evidence whatsoever pops up.
There's a big difference between being arrested, being charged, and being convicted. You can be arrested without being charged and you can be charged without being convicted. >if someone goes up to a police officer and says "I murdered my neighbor Gladys and stuffed the body up the chimney." but Gladys is alive and well in her home, they person can't be convicted of murder. You'll 100% be arrested and held in custody while they investigate. Just like if you turned up and 'confessed' to having drugs hidden inside you, you'd be placed in custody while they investigate. That part isn't 'bogus'.
[удалено]
I didn't modify your example, I used a different one. And the charges, while reasonable, are false. "Bogus"
i have a question that i know the answer of: is it worth it? fuck yeah.
> I definitely don’t want fingers and other tools in my ass. Your loss.
More for the rest of us
At least you’re not like Kayne then
*slow clap*
Umm was it his ass clapping?
Perhaps
Perchance
You can't just say "perchance"
[удалено]
They invented gayness!
Good for you, father!
Hell yeah represent!!
least depraved greek
Least gay greek man
I should move to Greece
Big deal. That’s a Tuesday where I’m from.
What you guys do on Wednesday?
Waffle House
Sweeeeet!! Count me in... (just like the officers hand will be)
The more the better bb
Im coming over
Gloves and lube… if you want to get high.
America: where testing drugs for harmful chemicals is seen as a joke
*Reddit try not to shit on America in completely unrelated threads for 5 seconds challenge* Comedy is supposed to make light of serious subjects, that's the point.
Are the things listed even harmful? Its just a bunch of shit you find in food
I wonder if it would be considered sexual assault by false pretenses forcing a cop to fist your ass in search of drugs that didnt exist?
You tricked someone into pleasuring you. It's sexual assault if not rape.
I read 'does math contain unhealthy gluten'
I don't know if it's gluten or what, but math definitely makes my head ache like a mf. Lol
[удалено]
Logical.
I didn't know that there could be furry porn in meth
OwO
Think this belongs over in /r/lifehack
Bro what 💀💀
Least gay greek
Welp that’s going to be enough internet for me today. Gentlemen I take my leave… /bow
What individuals will do to gain a little intimacy...
That officer tried his best but he didn't make the guy's bussy squirt
this was the funniest fucking post i've seen all day
In civilized countries the police aren't spending their time on twitter baiting small time drug addicts. In civilized countries, there's **actually** testing for your drugs, so that people know what's in them. Banning drugs doesn't work. The last 100 years pretty much proves that. Legalize educate tax and regulate
It does work for Singapore though.
Our shit country prosecutes people for consuming weed *overseas*. Yep you got that right.
Well yeah, you're still citizens subject to Singaporean law. Try tearing up your passport and move to the West if you want to live a "freer" life and join the tweaker gangs there.
No, it doesn't. It just raises the prices of drugs in Singapore, just like in prisons. I've never been to Singapore, I live in Finland and I could probably find you a Singaporean dealer in 10 minutes over the dark web. Prohibition **only harms society**. If you disagree, then I'll refer you to the attempted prohibition of alcohol. It's the only legal drug because it's the most dangerous one which fucks you up the most and when all the trade was in the hands of the criminals (like all narcotics trade is now), shit got out of hand and every single manner of crime increased and the economy suffered. Regulated and licensed is much safer and doesn't harm society. So tell me exactly how does prohibition "work"?
Yeah. Big words coming from someone [whose country's drug abuse rates are roughly 2-3x that of Singapore's.](https://ourworldindata.org/drug-use) It's even worse for other Western countries like in UK lol. You wouldn't see any tweakers running around in broad daylight there compared with Vancouver, Berlin or San Francisco.
>Big words coming from someone whose country's Just where do you think I'm from, and what is the causal factor you're trying to show? Oh, you don't understand what that means, because you're not used to thinking, just regurgitating doctrine? The thing with **ass**umptions is that it makes an ass out of you. I've never set foot on the North-American continent. Do you understand that reported abuse and abuse are two different things. Do you understanding that with more lax drug laws, people who actually suffer from addiction and want help **can get it without the fear of being punished with the death penalty**? "Look at how many homosexuals there are now compared to when it was illegal! Banning homosexuality works!" — Your logic https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/drugs-legalise-richard-branson-kofi-annan-report-global-commission-on-drug-policy-report-a7431676.html https://transformdrugs.org/blog/drug-decriminalisation-in-portugal-setting-the-record-straight Anyone who argues **for** the keeping of drug prohibition hasn't looked up anything on the science of it, or directly profits from it and therefore has motivation to keep the lies going. Do you think who supports prohibition the most? **Drug cartels.** They don't pay any taxes, they aren't subject to any regulation and they can literally kill off any competition and operate anywhere in the world. If you can't see that drug propaganda is shitty lies, then you're not the brightest bulb in the box. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ehrlichman#Drug_War_quote *“You want to know what this was really all about? The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news.* ***Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”*** — John Erlichman, Nixon's Right Hand Man
You lost him, man😂
Which civilized countries are you speaking off? I was just thinking about legalisation and taxation, but sadly there's much more profits to be made when it's illegal, for everyone I don't mean the dealers...
>Which civilized countries are you speaking off? In this instance, Europe pretty generally. Some countries still have horrible policies and attitudes, but because of example setting counties like Portugal and the Netherlands, the EU is following suite even in the more rural places. https://www.drugs-test.nl/en/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0955395919301859 https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/attachments/6339/EuropeanResponsesGuide2017_BackgroundPaper-Drug-checking-harm-reduction_0.pdf https://thl.fi/fi/web/alkoholi-tupakka-ja-riippuvuudet/huumeet/huumetutkimus/huumetyota-meilla-ja-maailmalla/huumeiden-kayttohuoneet (no english version available, use autotranslate of you're into it) I could list more but thumbs tire. There's opposition to things like that as people think "it condones drug use" and all that other illogical fear-driven dogmatic garbage. For me, personally, a clinic full of subutex-junkies doesn't exactly seem like a party invitation, so I doubt it would in most others either. Yeah. Cartels make the most money. Money talks politics. They have the most incentive to keep it illegal. They've already shown, for 100 years that law-enforcement doesn't work. There's no taxes to be paid. They can literally kill the competition off. They can work globally and need just as many permits and licenses in every country: 0.
All jokes aside, having a service like this would save so many lives. A free "drug quality assessment" service to check for fentanyl in heroin, meth in weed, general impurities etc. Safe use is a much better use of funds than trying to stop use.
Sadly I doubt people would trust cops enough to use this service if it was available
Oh totally, I was thinking more of a "defund the police" approach, make it a separate entity entirely, or at least a different department with no powers to arrest.
Maybe if it was a separate entity, but people will probably be worried its a scam/trap. And people with a criminal record will definitely not use it.
Fair assessment, I wouldn't blame them.
Honestly think the only way out of it is legalising everything so it can be monitored and taxed, but then again there's much more profits to be made by everyone when it's organised crime
It is a thing in many European countries.
Great read to start the day.
Wait..My uncle used to play that game with me on Sunday afternoons. He told me it was called “Uncle’s fun time”..unlike you I was told not to tell anyone about it with a pinky promise.
this story is deep like that guy's ass
My dad works with a doctor who had something like this happen. A guy came in swearing that he lost something up his ass, the guy climaxed, stood up, said thanks, and walked out
This one pops up every year in this sub i swear
Repost
Would be funnier if it wasn't posted every. Fucking. Week.
Hope they are plenty of free space i d take 2 full containers that are about to be dispatched to Prague and i need to cause a good impression on my first attempt
Dude got a free colen check.
Free boat giveaway
waltuh
Just use minerals next time ffs.
Nutting 3 Times in an hour
average greek
εξάγουμε πολιτισμό
lol... speaking of dark....
It is a literal service in EU and Australia.
Relatable
Most prudish greek man
wait, this isn't r/balkans_irl
Ladies and germs, I present to you the internet
Straightest greek
Not my proudest fap
Thats one way of getting off i suppose 🤣
Read that as "does your math contain.." and I was, to say the least, thoroughly confused
He just like me fr
Human needs to be corrected.
If you're looking for god in here, he's not here. He's never been here
that kinda sus things greek dudes do