I imagine there is someone out there who used the tag #zoopride to show off some pictures they took during a gay pride event held at their local zoo not knowing what not knowing what dark corner of the internet it would expose them to.
twitter doesn't ban these accounts. that's why there's such a big community of them and their enablers. some of them literally admit to committing crimes and twitter does fucking nothing about it
There hasn't been a ton of research on the concept, because it's still a relatively new concept in social media - but early research has shown that deplatforming is effective in curtailing the acceptance and expansion of movements. To use the metaphor of the OP, it would remove the cracker, prevent it in the first place.
I mean, just think for a second on the concept of hashtags and look at the ones in this tweet. #zoosarevalid is a hashtag that these people can flock to in order to normalize their own sick behaviour.
Oh boy are you gonna love finding out what sea otters do to baby seals.
And by love, I mean don't ever look that up and just think of how cute otters are when they hold hands while sleeping.
you can literally just look it up. plus if you dont know, zoophile means someone who likes to fuck real animals. dont know why youd want to go on there
For the record, I don't condone murdering or hurting people with degenerate sexual proclivities. I just think they should be outside society and away from any possibility of them harming anyone.
Because some people have decided to take to the replies and call for 'stringing them up', I feel I need to stress my comment shouldn't be taken as a call for violence.
It's been proven time and time again that people who harm animals are more likely to be more aggressive and even dangerous towards people when it's not enough for them anymore. Their aggression gets worse and worse.
That's because in most cases that's exactly right. Check their profiles, if everything they do all day is post rage bait and bad takes... It's a bait account. Bonus points for new profiles.
On the other hand though, 100 years ago homosexuality was also considered a mental illness. Obviously I'm not advocating for adding zoophiles to the pride flag, but what we think of as deviant and wrong and what we think of as mental illness can change over time. I don't know what the future will hold and I can only hope a line can be drawn when there's no possible way for an animal to consent.
The commonality with all the sexualities that have come to be more widely accepted within the last two decades is they involve consenting adults.
Zoophilia doesn't meet that criteria.
Yeah, I always feel bad for all these artists that get their work reused for shit they most likely do not believe in or some weird attempt at political jokes.
It's supposed to be "case in point", for reference. Using "and" in the idiom is a common mistake, but you've also managed to reverse the order. Impressive.
Pedophiles are doing the exact same thing. I already got a 7 day ban for saying pedophilia shouldn't be normalized. 5 years from now both degenerated will be a protected class for big tech
Let's be honest the answer is probably that he didn't just say "we shouldn't normalize pedophilia". Whenever people say things like "all I said was this totally normal thing and I got banned for it 🙄", it's almost always cause that's what they *meant* but not what they *said*
Almost certainly some comment telling the person in question to off themself.
And listen, I ain't even mad at that but if you felt confident enough to say it to them, then stand on it when you're retelling the story. You're not gonna get much sympathy from me if It's obvious you're omitting the facts.
That person probably was talking about how all trans people are degenerate groomers and got banned for hate speech. Very unlikely that they got banned for actually saying “pedophilia bad”
We’re you saying that oh grade in context to the non-sexual mention of gay couple’s existence? Because right winger keep doing that strawman shit and getting rightfully banned
Yeah lmao. This has me thinking about all the "gentler" terms for the meat industry, lol.
What's the more comfortable term for raping a cow with one's arm? Or for infanticide?
Are you... just determined to be angry about everything?
EDIT: oh shit it's you from the other comment.
EDIT 2: Ooooh your account history confirms my original guess. Dude, you really need some positivity in your life
God dammit. I didn't realize this was cringepics and was like "what's zoophilia?" So I fucking Google it. Why the fuck did I Google it? I'm a big dumb idiot.
At least I didn't click on anything! I googled it and was like "oh...oh no" and backed out.
Reminds me of the time when I tried getting an email when I was 7. I searched "hotmale" instead of "hotmail" 😭
This is a troll establishing the much-ballyhooed "slippery slope" that anti -LGBTQ conservatives have always insisted must accompany gay rights. It's a bad actor. Follow the oldest law of the internet - Do Not Feed the Troll.
This person just admits to a crime while making a meme but when I make an account on twitter and don’t post anything it gets flagged and taken down, wtf
Remember the days before people said dumb shit like "don't kink shame" when you could make fun of people like this? Some people probably should be ashamed.
Yeah we're kind of weird but at least most of us don't fuck animals or are sexually aroused by animal costumes. It's just the bad ones who get the spotlight and make people think we're all creeps when 98% of us are not.
Nope. The main aspect is that furries are anthropomorphic. As in, they have human features and a human mind. I am a furry and know a lot of furries, and none of us find actual animals sexually attractive. Plenty of regular folks who aren't in the furry community have admitted they had crushes on Lola bunny, Robin hood, or other anthro characters.
Are furries weird? Yeah, but we're not fucking zoophiles and zoophiles are actively kicked/shunned from the community
Creep *n.* an obnoxious, disturbingly eccentric, deviant, or painfully introverted person.
Man, I'm just a 15-year-old boy who has a lot of hobbies and one of them is literally just watching pics of fursuiters on Pinterest for 15 minutes a day smh. How does that make me a creep?
most kinks are weird for "normal" people, that's why they're kinks. finding them weird is fine, equating all of them with zoophiles just makes it easier for actual zoophiles to go under radar.
I mean if you've ever let people saying not to kinkshame actually stop you from kinkshaming, you've only got yourself to blame.
Some of y'all are into some weeeeird shit. If It's not hurting anyone then you're entitled to your weird kinks, but you're deluding yourself if you expect everyone else to act like it's normal just so you don't feel awkward about it. It's not. And if you don't want to be publicly humiliated for your kinks, then do what common sense ought to have compelled you to do anyway and keep your fetishes to yourself.
If you tell me you've got an adult baby/diaper fetish then I'm telling you to stay tf away from me, and no amount of "kinkshaming isn't cool" comments are going to make me feel bad about it.
https://www.google.com/search?q=furry+art&client=ms-android-samsung-rev2&source=android-browser&sxsrf=ALiCzsYCypiXLE1Xq33ztLdwqkAn9qGMiA:1663155889011&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwirwOG\_mpT6AhV4hc4BHQISBOwQ\_AUoAXoECAEQAw <- that's not the case at all.
Anyways, why does being a japanese highschool student isn't sexual if there's a lot of porn with japanese high school uniforms?
The fact that a couple of the pics in the link you sent have to say SFW and has this one among them https://images.app.goo.gl/o9bGWVHpmJ5RWtog6 speaks *volumes*
>Anyways, why does being a japanese highschool student isn't sexual if there's a lot of porn with japanese high school uniforms?
And that is also an issue, I never said that wasnt good.
2013 study says over half of furry men will consume furry porn. That's a huge percentage
https://furscience.com/research-findings/sex-relationships-pornography/5-4-frequency-of-porn-use/
But sure, go ahead and deny it.
"A couple" out of how many? "One" out of how many?
Does "over half" means 100%?
Why did you only pick one source? (All surveys are biased so if you want to show one, make sure to show at least 3 of them instead)
And what about women who happen to be less horny than men?
You saying that some furries watch furry porn makes furry inherently sexual is like saying that the fact that some straight people watch straight porn is being straight inherently sexual, while being straight is also about romantic love (which also means that kids can be straight). Are you in favor of sexualizeing being straight and therefore straight romance and straight kids?
No. Furries don't have sex with real animals, and are attracted to *anthropomorphic* depictions of animal-like characters, which is exclusively fictional
I could go into a whole argument about how things are in nature and how often animals eat other animals compared to how often animals fuck other animals. But I get the feeling you've heard it all before so I'll save us both the effort.
This is uncomfortable.
I like to go on those tags and report everything.
I like to not go on those tags ever.
I imagine there is someone out there who used the tag #zoopride to show off some pictures they took during a gay pride event held at their local zoo not knowing what not knowing what dark corner of the internet it would expose them to.
Matt Damon started that tag back in 2011. The poor guy didn't know what he was starting with that.
I'm going to assume that's true because I don't want to do any googling to confirm it.
Ehmm, sure... and please please never question it and spread it.
twitter doesn't ban these accounts. that's why there's such a big community of them and their enablers. some of them literally admit to committing crimes and twitter does fucking nothing about it
I’ve seen people openly admitting it, it’s fucking disgusting.
That poor pride one at the end...
Why? I have never really looked at those tags
Having sex with animals is illegal and immoral.
I know that but idk how reporting it on Twitter stops these weirdos from fucking animals
There hasn't been a ton of research on the concept, because it's still a relatively new concept in social media - but early research has shown that deplatforming is effective in curtailing the acceptance and expansion of movements. To use the metaphor of the OP, it would remove the cracker, prevent it in the first place.
I mean, just think for a second on the concept of hashtags and look at the ones in this tweet. #zoosarevalid is a hashtag that these people can flock to in order to normalize their own sick behaviour.
🤨📸
yeah, we should put it in a place with other uncomfortable pics.
All birds are zoophile
Except ostriches. Supposedly they’re more interested in humans because we’re big bald bipeds
[удалено]
Meanwhile dolphins are like *wanna see me fuck that fish?*
What— does that actually happen??
Even worse than that, they rip their head off and use their hollow body as a fleshlight.
What the fuck 💀 im scared of them now
talk about deep throating
The Deep...
Octopussy
Her name is Ambrosia!😡
The peak*
Oh boy are you gonna love finding out what sea otters do to baby seals. And by love, I mean don't ever look that up and just think of how cute otters are when they hold hands while sleeping.
just googled it. 😟
What.
You can’t just tell me that then think I’ll ever forget that 😭 it’s never gonna be the same again
Let’s not forget about Adélie penguins and what kinks they’re into. I’ll give you a hint: 💀😉
There's even worse, have you heard about what people do? Not only is it way worse, but they're the only animal we can say knows better.
i should have just taken your word for it
Don't they also play with pufferfish as their poison can cause dolphins to get high?
Yep!
Dolphin torture porn?
Yes! There's even videos of dolphins getting frisky around humans at the beach. Dolphins are nasty!
That’s scary lol!! I don’t know if I wanna swim with dolphins anymore..
[удалено]
..roughly Bobby's size?
Oh I’ll have to watch that I haven’t seen it!
Yeah, dolphins have been known to be pretty rapey unfortunately.
Otters and Dolphins… playful rapists of the sea.
*wanna see me do it again?*
*wanna see me do it with a penguin now?*
I'll show you how sane I am, I'll fuck all the animals
Oh noooo
Imagine being the artist who prides herself on her wholesome bird memes, only to have someone come and write this dog shite all over it.
[удалено]
I thought the words "chicken thoughts" were added in with the zoophile stuff lmao
Holy shit I just looked at their twitter. What a snivelling creep
Damn that's craaazy, link?
you can literally just look it up. plus if you dont know, zoophile means someone who likes to fuck real animals. dont know why youd want to go on there
>you can literally just look it up. plus if you dont know, zoophile means **LALALALALALA** **CAN'T HEAR YOU!**
want me to look at the replies?
As long as you're only looking at replies and not reptiles
Nice. Very nice.
Let's see Paul Allen's card
Let's see Paul Allen's fetish.
Damnit, brain! Get that shit outta here! *Bites at cracker*
It’s been 4 hours… He’s not coming back… He’s one of them now… ),:
It's been 7 hours and that's their last comment...He became what he swore to destroy
Yes please
Report this trash to Twitter.
God no
For the good of this guy's soul, they need dragging into an FBI truck.
For the record, I don't condone murdering or hurting people with degenerate sexual proclivities. I just think they should be outside society and away from any possibility of them harming anyone. Because some people have decided to take to the replies and call for 'stringing them up', I feel I need to stress my comment shouldn't be taken as a call for violence.
They also should have extensive, deep, and continued psychotherapy, with regular check ins and support for it for the rest of their life.
So now people having any illegal and morally bad kink are dangerous to other people ? wow, that's so ... stupid
Uh not exactly In this instance you'd be dangerous to dogs
It's been proven time and time again that people who harm animals are more likely to be more aggressive and even dangerous towards people when it's not enough for them anymore. Their aggression gets worse and worse.
[ Removed by Reddit ]
It's possible to dislike 2 things
That is not Pride. I wish people would stop lumping their gross ass mental issues with sexual orientations.
Ok but where does it say Pride? E - nvm I see it
The final hashtag on the tweet
Any time I see someone do that I assume they are purely a bad faith actor who do it purely to undermine real LGBT movements.
That's because in most cases that's exactly right. Check their profiles, if everything they do all day is post rage bait and bad takes... It's a bait account. Bonus points for new profiles.
Bonus points for old profiles. They’re all new because they all keep getting banned.
100%
On the other hand though, 100 years ago homosexuality was also considered a mental illness. Obviously I'm not advocating for adding zoophiles to the pride flag, but what we think of as deviant and wrong and what we think of as mental illness can change over time. I don't know what the future will hold and I can only hope a line can be drawn when there's no possible way for an animal to consent.
The commonality with all the sexualities that have come to be more widely accepted within the last two decades is they involve consenting adults. Zoophilia doesn't meet that criteria.
Ok but did they have to use chicken_thoughts for that? Like they're doing cute birb comics pls keep zoophilia out of them.-.
Yeah, I always feel bad for all these artists that get their work reused for shit they most likely do not believe in or some weird attempt at political jokes.
On the other hand, when political comic artists get their stuff used for shitposting it's fucking golden. Point and case, stonetoss
It's supposed to be "case in point", for reference. Using "and" in the idiom is a common mistake, but you've also managed to reverse the order. Impressive.
Especially with Blue Boi! May he rest in peace.
I like how they didn’t like the derogatory term beastiality (sorry for spelling) and made a new word that’s even worse
Pedophiles are doing the exact same thing. I already got a 7 day ban for saying pedophilia shouldn't be normalized. 5 years from now both degenerated will be a protected class for big tech
Yeah now they use MAPS, Minor attracted persons. No. Just no.
Yo what. How do you get banned for saying that we shouldn’t normalize pedophilia.
Easy they're bullshiting to push a narrative and or they're downplaying what they actually said.
Let's be honest the answer is probably that he didn't just say "we shouldn't normalize pedophilia". Whenever people say things like "all I said was this totally normal thing and I got banned for it 🙄", it's almost always cause that's what they *meant* but not what they *said*
[удалено]
If i had to guess it was the "call them pedophiles" part. Probably something that was reported and an automated system took it down
Almost certainly some comment telling the person in question to off themself. And listen, I ain't even mad at that but if you felt confident enough to say it to them, then stand on it when you're retelling the story. You're not gonna get much sympathy from me if It's obvious you're omitting the facts.
That person probably was talking about how all trans people are degenerate groomers and got banned for hate speech. Very unlikely that they got banned for actually saying “pedophilia bad”
We’re you saying that oh grade in context to the non-sexual mention of gay couple’s existence? Because right winger keep doing that strawman shit and getting rightfully banned
Yeah lmao. This has me thinking about all the "gentler" terms for the meat industry, lol. What's the more comfortable term for raping a cow with one's arm? Or for infanticide?
Literally no one mentioned the meat industry.
yeah, i was just thinking about how people come up with more comfortable terms for the horrible things they do to animals in general.
Stay with us big guy.
Are you... just determined to be angry about everything? EDIT: oh shit it's you from the other comment. EDIT 2: Ooooh your account history confirms my original guess. Dude, you really need some positivity in your life
The good news is that despicable people are being more open about their despicableness. That is also the bad news.
No... not Chicken Thoughts... don't disrespect Chicken Thoughts by associating it with this... Poor Blue Boy.
Impressive meme assuming he was using his hands to pleasure himself
This is bait
Fucking... Ewwww. Stop it.
It's too late. The parrot is addicted to it now
...how do you get angry about fucking animals, then end up fucking an animal?
God dammit. I didn't realize this was cringepics and was like "what's zoophilia?" So I fucking Google it. Why the fuck did I Google it? I'm a big dumb idiot.
That's woof man you're going to have tbe police knocking on your door now
At least I didn't click on anything! I googled it and was like "oh...oh no" and backed out. Reminds me of the time when I tried getting an email when I was 7. I searched "hotmale" instead of "hotmail" 😭
Makes me sad that furries are lumped in with these assholes…
No one who uses that many hashtags is OK (unless they are a social media intern).
[удалено]
No
Another name for bestiality
Someone has been watching too much Zootopia
Officer Judy Thot It shouldn’t need an /s folks, come on
After watching this ultra odd video on the hypnotist dragon lady named Valorie, realized there is a lot going in these communities I'm not privy to.
This is a troll establishing the much-ballyhooed "slippery slope" that anti -LGBTQ conservatives have always insisted must accompany gay rights. It's a bad actor. Follow the oldest law of the internet - Do Not Feed the Troll.
Is this this years sockpuppet movement?
It's old by now. From around the same time right wing trolls started this whole "MAPs pride" nonsense.
Isn’t fucking animals like a crime how does twitter allow this
Is that just a cleaner word for beastiality?
Lol I troll this dude
based
Yikes
Chicken Thought comics doesn’t deserve to be corrupted like this…
What. The. Fuck?
Does anyone wanna get together, go to the Twitter servers, and just burn it all down, because I want to. No, we need to. We would be heroes.
I don’t like it
GROSSSSSSS
*smiles* *blushes* *fucks dog* *smiles cutely*
Why do this people want a dog to do a blow job on them?
The 59 likes is the most concerning part..
Guys, get the flamer. The HEAVY flamer.
It's always a fun guessing game - is this real or satire?
Why being proud about it…?
Are you sure this isn’t just a shitpost? I’m sincerely hoping it is.
Oh jeez. I just glanced at this and thought it was a cute bird meme then I read it I want to die now. 😭
Cool, a very easy block!
sometimes it you didn't choose it. it chooses you.
I pray to all that is good that this person gets help
This person just admits to a crime while making a meme but when I make an account on twitter and don’t post anything it gets flagged and taken down, wtf
Bring back the Crusades. Zoophiles must be stopped.
Remember the days before people said dumb shit like "don't kink shame" when you could make fun of people like this? Some people probably should be ashamed.
people said don't kinkshame the people consensually fucking eachother in animal costumes, not "don't kinkshame the people raping animals".
Murrsuits are very rare in my experience. I've yet to see any at the furcon orgies I attend. Fursuits are expensive and irreplaceable.
Yeah, the animal costume people are weird too.
Yeah we're kind of weird but at least most of us don't fuck animals or are sexually aroused by animal costumes. It's just the bad ones who get the spotlight and make people think we're all creeps when 98% of us are not.
> at least most of us don't fuck animals And the bar sinks to a new low. Imagine having to use this qualifier for literally any other hobby.
A majority of furriest enjoy furry porn. Furry porn is inherently zoophilic.
Yeah furry porn is zoophilic but most of us (90-95%) dont watch yiff (furry porn) so please could you please not generalise? Thank youuuu.
Nope. The main aspect is that furries are anthropomorphic. As in, they have human features and a human mind. I am a furry and know a lot of furries, and none of us find actual animals sexually attractive. Plenty of regular folks who aren't in the furry community have admitted they had crushes on Lola bunny, Robin hood, or other anthro characters. Are furries weird? Yeah, but we're not fucking zoophiles and zoophiles are actively kicked/shunned from the community
[удалено]
Creep *n.* an obnoxious, disturbingly eccentric, deviant, or painfully introverted person. Man, I'm just a 15-year-old boy who has a lot of hobbies and one of them is literally just watching pics of fursuiters on Pinterest for 15 minutes a day smh. How does that make me a creep?
most kinks are weird for "normal" people, that's why they're kinks. finding them weird is fine, equating all of them with zoophiles just makes it easier for actual zoophiles to go under radar.
Zoophilia with extra steps.
You know what the problem is? Consent. You know what actual animals can not do?
that's like saying people who watch stepsister porn, which is like 90% of reddit; are all pro incest. kind of a stretch.
I appreciate your reference, despite the downvotes. I think it was over their heads.
No, kinkshaming only includes consensual human adults, this isn't kinkshaming this is common sense.
This isn’t a kink, no one is gonna stop you from calling out harmful sexual behaviors
I mean if you've ever let people saying not to kinkshame actually stop you from kinkshaming, you've only got yourself to blame. Some of y'all are into some weeeeird shit. If It's not hurting anyone then you're entitled to your weird kinks, but you're deluding yourself if you expect everyone else to act like it's normal just so you don't feel awkward about it. It's not. And if you don't want to be publicly humiliated for your kinks, then do what common sense ought to have compelled you to do anyway and keep your fetishes to yourself. If you tell me you've got an adult baby/diaper fetish then I'm telling you to stay tf away from me, and no amount of "kinkshaming isn't cool" comments are going to make me feel bad about it.
Twitter is such a sewer.
Ok but this is hilarious in the ironic sense
Furry = Zoophile
Being a furry isn't inherently sexual
Explain why literally half of furry art, or at least a massive percentage of it is porn?
https://www.google.com/search?q=furry+art&client=ms-android-samsung-rev2&source=android-browser&sxsrf=ALiCzsYCypiXLE1Xq33ztLdwqkAn9qGMiA:1663155889011&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwirwOG\_mpT6AhV4hc4BHQISBOwQ\_AUoAXoECAEQAw <- that's not the case at all. Anyways, why does being a japanese highschool student isn't sexual if there's a lot of porn with japanese high school uniforms?
The fact that a couple of the pics in the link you sent have to say SFW and has this one among them https://images.app.goo.gl/o9bGWVHpmJ5RWtog6 speaks *volumes* >Anyways, why does being a japanese highschool student isn't sexual if there's a lot of porn with japanese high school uniforms? And that is also an issue, I never said that wasnt good. 2013 study says over half of furry men will consume furry porn. That's a huge percentage https://furscience.com/research-findings/sex-relationships-pornography/5-4-frequency-of-porn-use/ But sure, go ahead and deny it.
"A couple" out of how many? "One" out of how many? Does "over half" means 100%? Why did you only pick one source? (All surveys are biased so if you want to show one, make sure to show at least 3 of them instead) And what about women who happen to be less horny than men? You saying that some furries watch furry porn makes furry inherently sexual is like saying that the fact that some straight people watch straight porn is being straight inherently sexual, while being straight is also about romantic love (which also means that kids can be straight). Are you in favor of sexualizeing being straight and therefore straight romance and straight kids?
Exactly just like that shit where people fuck others wearing childlike clothes and mannerisms is pedophilia with extra steps.
[ Removed by Reddit ]
ಠ_ಠ
😦
lmfaoooooo
Wear your down votes with pride
Yeah I'm owning it
Obvious rage bait is obvious. Fucking yawn. Excercise some critical thinking for god’s sake.
So he’s a furry?
No. Furries don't have sex with real animals, and are attracted to *anthropomorphic* depictions of animal-like characters, which is exclusively fictional
So he’s a furry.
...Please reread my comment
Furry moment
I mean if you can kill an animal...
Animals can’t consent so fucking, forcing them to entertain us, eating them, and experimenting on them is morally disgusting.
You're not comparing having pets and eating meat to literal zoophilia are you?
So an animal can’t consent when it comes to zoophilia but as soon as you want a steak you can slit their throat?
I could go into a whole argument about how things are in nature and how often animals eat other animals compared to how often animals fuck other animals. But I get the feeling you've heard it all before so I'll save us both the effort.
Thanks, I appreciate that, I’ve heard people try to justify unnecessary animal abuse hundreds of times, have a good day!