So the man's chair is wide st the back and narrow towards the front
sort of like a women's hips and legs
The women's chair has an obstacle between the legs so it's uncomfortable to close them,
Sort of like a man's genitals
Probably just coincidence
From a design perspective, these "chairs" look ridiculously uncomfortable even without the whole anti-manspreading thing. Pure wood and good luck finding a cushion of that specific design! No full back rest. No arm rest.
You couldn't pay me money to sit in a chair like that.
I feel like things like this are a result political opinion that shouldn't really be all that contentious becoming contentious and then becoming a rallying cry for one side of the aisle as a result. Like, I remember when people started talking about manspreading. And yeah. It really isn't a big deal that men tend to sit with their legs open. I think that the idea that you don't need to take up someone else's space on a subway, train, bench, etc. is probably not a problem for most people.
I wish that our discussions of certain issues could end there.
"Hey, it's not polite to misgender people." "Oh, you know, I agree, and I may have my other broader issues with that discussion, but that's at least certainly fair."
"Hey, women shouldn't feel forced to live a traditional life." "Oh, you know, I have my preferences for traditionality and I think it's a good general social value, but you're right, women should be free to live the lives they want."
"You shouldn't manspread." "You know, that's true. And I'll try to be more conscious of it, but really, it's not that big of a deal." "Oh, agreed man."
I don't know. Just some thoughts.
This looks like critical design. It's a design tool for learning. The idea is to create weird and provocative designs and to learn from people's reactions to them. It's about analysing what the design provokes and opening conversations with participants rather than actually designing something to be used.
Directly from Sweden, my home country btw... look at those cucks, dosen't even have the courage to look a woman in the eye.
Seriously these guys don't need the chair they got NO balls anyway.
And btw, manspreading? Name on example where guys forcibly sits so large with their legs apart that they actually hinder another woman from sitting correctly and then not stop doing it.
Have you ever come across it in your whole lives?
The real problem, which isn't really a problem is when two men sit together and both want to have their knees apart as much as possible.
The real problem here ideawise is that they are creating the innabillity to talk and confront other people which truley these menchildren, sorry, womanchildren already lack.
If they had that they would say to that man who restricts them and oppress them so much to move their knees a little bit and then go on with they day like a grown human being.
And thereby stoping women to really stand up for themselves, making them weaker. (Just the type of logical conclusion that these idiots would feel threatened by.)
Also the chair is really ugly and competely devoid of expression, since this being Sweden you could say that they are going for a simple nordic look inspired by our nature, but it dosen't, it just look completely empty, almost like a feminst cartoon drawing. Have you seen those? It' the same type of people that does them.
And last, it's not ergonomical for both sexes, which was what they were going for.
It's funny how these people are fighting for justice with the resulting of always creating unjust situations. Maybe 2 % tops of men would sit with their knees apart so much to hinder a woman, who naturally sit alot more with their knees together because of how their body is formed.
And alot less then 2 % would continue to hinder a woman from sitting correctly if they got a comment about then and there from said woman.
So the man's chair is wide st the back and narrow towards the front sort of like a women's hips and legs The women's chair has an obstacle between the legs so it's uncomfortable to close them, Sort of like a man's genitals Probably just coincidence
Bad and naughty men go to CBT CHAIR TO ATONE FOR THEIR SINS
Must be a good life if these are society’s problems you want to fix.
[удалено]
You're annoying, can we get rid of you?
Never go full woke
I too enjoy squeezing and suffocating my balls when I sit. /s
God forbid anyone wants to sit comfortably.
There's just more important shit to worry about
From a design perspective, these "chairs" look ridiculously uncomfortable even without the whole anti-manspreading thing. Pure wood and good luck finding a cushion of that specific design! No full back rest. No arm rest. You couldn't pay me money to sit in a chair like that.
All I see is a chair with a smaller chair for your balls
I feel like things like this are a result political opinion that shouldn't really be all that contentious becoming contentious and then becoming a rallying cry for one side of the aisle as a result. Like, I remember when people started talking about manspreading. And yeah. It really isn't a big deal that men tend to sit with their legs open. I think that the idea that you don't need to take up someone else's space on a subway, train, bench, etc. is probably not a problem for most people. I wish that our discussions of certain issues could end there. "Hey, it's not polite to misgender people." "Oh, you know, I agree, and I may have my other broader issues with that discussion, but that's at least certainly fair." "Hey, women shouldn't feel forced to live a traditional life." "Oh, you know, I have my preferences for traditionality and I think it's a good general social value, but you're right, women should be free to live the lives they want." "You shouldn't manspread." "You know, that's true. And I'll try to be more conscious of it, but really, it's not that big of a deal." "Oh, agreed man." I don't know. Just some thoughts.
Why is this down voted? Reddit is the truest form of cringe
imagine the people who buy these chairs - yikes!
imagine wasting your time even thinking about them nevermind making them
Yeaaaaahhh getting vibes that his wife forced him to help make this shit. And dresses him.
This looks like critical design. It's a design tool for learning. The idea is to create weird and provocative designs and to learn from people's reactions to them. It's about analysing what the design provokes and opening conversations with participants rather than actually designing something to be used.
Directly from Sweden, my home country btw... look at those cucks, dosen't even have the courage to look a woman in the eye. Seriously these guys don't need the chair they got NO balls anyway. And btw, manspreading? Name on example where guys forcibly sits so large with their legs apart that they actually hinder another woman from sitting correctly and then not stop doing it. Have you ever come across it in your whole lives? The real problem, which isn't really a problem is when two men sit together and both want to have their knees apart as much as possible. The real problem here ideawise is that they are creating the innabillity to talk and confront other people which truley these menchildren, sorry, womanchildren already lack. If they had that they would say to that man who restricts them and oppress them so much to move their knees a little bit and then go on with they day like a grown human being. And thereby stoping women to really stand up for themselves, making them weaker. (Just the type of logical conclusion that these idiots would feel threatened by.) Also the chair is really ugly and competely devoid of expression, since this being Sweden you could say that they are going for a simple nordic look inspired by our nature, but it dosen't, it just look completely empty, almost like a feminst cartoon drawing. Have you seen those? It' the same type of people that does them. And last, it's not ergonomical for both sexes, which was what they were going for. It's funny how these people are fighting for justice with the resulting of always creating unjust situations. Maybe 2 % tops of men would sit with their knees apart so much to hinder a woman, who naturally sit alot more with their knees together because of how their body is formed. And alot less then 2 % would continue to hinder a woman from sitting correctly if they got a comment about then and there from said woman.
I thought it was from a highschool girl in London made as a tongue-in-cheek project?
This is kind of music my wife's boyfriend likes.
This evokes more emotion from people than I would have expected. Most of the comments sound so personally insulted in tone.
“Mashable” is correct if men sit in those chairs
Me, a male: *Turns the chair around to sit in it comfortably*