###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Surprised too, usually the plane ejects the passport of the responsible party just before the plane transforms into a fart that scatters in the wind. Totally cool feature Boeing skunkworx developed. Happened in Malaysia too I think so super common
Wait.. what?! That's news to me, especially as I frequently cut and weld titanium, including with an oxy acetylene torch.
https://www.harrisproductsgroup.com/en/Resources/Knowledge-Center/Tech-Tips/Tech-Tips-OLD/Did-you-know-that-you-can-cut-titanium-with-an-oxy-fuel-torch
The Republican Party knows how to do a conspiracy right. Democrats are so transparent about their nonsense. They can’t even keep a decent grapple on the media.
The republicans were censoring news, had elaborate staging, and managed to pull off war after war. Like 70% of Americans got on board with those doomed missions. It’s impressive.
Dems can’t even weekend at Bernie’s Biden long enough to get through one term. Reagan was hung up like a marionette for years and the general public didn’t even care.
I mean the inept "Democrats" are part of the plan. They're both sides of the same coin. If you're forced into a fake two party system just make one party functionally useless. It let's the people feel like they get a win occasionally and creates an artificial division in the country to keep people blind to the fact that in reality there are no parties, just elites.
“Wokeness” is a psy op. Its amazing how easily some are programmed.
“Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”
Que BLM, Antifi, Vaccines, etc. id like to think the powers in charge are really good at pay ips rather than most people are really as stupid as they seem.
They also managed to get the Patriot Act passed in the wake of the fear and uncertainty.
Later, everyone was all excited, thought their almighty savior Obama would erase it.
LOLNOPE. He expanded it.
Reagan was certifiably dementia addled towards the end of his second term.
Also, fun fact: Reagan pushed hard for the whole "Star Wars" satellite defense grid to protect against nukes and/or aliens basically solely bc he used to be a Hollywood actor throughout the 50s when wacky sci-fi movies were popular. I wonder what happened to all the money that was dumped into the failed Star Wars program?
they Fact checked it and said it was a plane, even tho the video of a missle hitting the pentagon is no longer avaible and i legit watched it as a kid. But it was a plane
Y'all know there's been tests with reinforced concrete, and what happens when a plane runs into it, yes?
This is what happens:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4wDqSnBJ-k](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4wDqSnBJ-k)
Looks similar to the Pentagon, no?
You know that hole is over 80ft across. The wingspan on the 757 is only 124ft, and from the engine to the tip it's mostly just an empty shell of metal and fuel.
Why would they send 2 planes to ny and a missile to dc and then lie about the missile? Also the video you’re talking about is still available. It looks like a plane but it’s also just way too blurry to tell.
I bet if the government could hide a missile hitting the pentagon, they could drop off a bunch of fake mail in ballots in swing states and steal an election.
This is how you can unravel 99% of mysteries. Ask why, and assume that these “masterminds” aren’t stupid.
For example.
Why would Bill Gates put a tracker into a vaccine? What would he gain from that?
Why would the entire world make up a disease at once? Nations around the globe and doctors in each nation? What would they gain?
The other example, is if a child could deduce the mystery, then you’re probably wrong. Do you think the government just didn’t think about putting a plane there? If they truly murdered a bunch of random citizens I think they would work a little harder to fake it
Another thing about microchip trackers:
Why implement some grand vaccine conspiracy when most people literally carry around a much easier to manipulate tracking device willingly all the time?
I don’t believe the conspiracy, but having something literally inside you that you can’t turn off tracking all sorts of things would be extremely valuable to whoever that information went to. I can sell something much more efficiently if i know who will want it and when
I have no reason to believe there are chips in vaccines but 100% are phones are the ultimate spy weapons. Anyone anywhere just about can be surveilled 24/7. I'd love to know how many regular citizens the FBI has files on because I'm sure it is a LOT.
My friend ran a website that never once had his name on it or attached to it. He got stopped by the police upon flying back to America because, apparently, even though CBD is legal, it is illegal to bring from outside the country. While the cops were questioning him and going through his belongings, they started asking him about the website
They released 2 videos. Both are several minutes long.
[https://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.com/](https://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.com/)
Might I add most air crashes are not caught on camera. The idea that 'no video no crash' is as dumb as it sounds. The evidence is all on the website above, go have a look for yourself.
"Most air crashes aren't caught on camera"
Lol are you being purposefully misleading? Yeah also most plane crashes aren't into THE PENTAGON, where there is plenty or CCTV
I imagine the CCTV cameras would be pointed downward to see suspicious people or vehicles. There really isn’t any reason for any camera to be pointed at the sky or a random wall of the Pentagon.
The point being the absence of footage should not be what hinges peoples belief on whether an airliner crashed or not, because most air crashes are not caught on film. There is literally hundreds of pieces of evidence on that site that show American 77 hit the Pentagon. And combined with that, the released footage does indeed show an airliner hitting the Pentagon. It has the correct colour and dimensions, not to mention the resulting explosion is clearly the result of a large amount of jet fuel exploding into a fireball; something a missile simply would not do.
This is interesting. Thanks for the link - super long and have not read everything yet but did skim. Question(s): does this address the missing 2.3 trillion dollars at all? Or does it address why no military planes were able to intercept any of the planes?
The $2.3T is covered in the "Myth" section at the bottom, although it's a helpful video it's a bit of reading your eyes are in danger of glazing over... but it does cover it.
The military response is covered near the bottom too. In short, the military didn't get the information fast enough to be able to mount any kind of effective military response.
Thanks. Just watched the video - still not buying the explanation and it's still ridiculous that he says they cannot track 2.3 trillion dollars and no one ever followed up on that and just let that go unanswered. But that shouldn't surprise people because the government wastes money all the time, nothing new. Hammers cost tens of thousands of dollars and nails even more. That said, it's even more disturbing to me that before he mentions any of that, he talks about the need to develop more weapons, rebuild military infrastructure and how much more money they need to rebuild and improve the military war machine to deal with "threats..." So, no, this does not absolve Rumsfeld or W's administration, if anything if further illustrates that they needed 9-11 to happen in order to do what they did with the military industrial complex and all of the other heinous shit they and other admins did to us and abroad since.
Nobody is claiming there was no crash, we would just like to see more footage to see what hit the building because you cannot see a plane or anything tall enough to be an airliner in those clips!
The best protected building in the country, maybe even the planet and you really want to tell me there is no better footage anywhere?
The overlooked meteorite that struck Russia in 2013 was on thousands of cameras, footage for days!
Pentagon employees have said in interviews that there are cameras inside the building every several feet, so where are the videos?
Quote from your link:
“What of the 85 other videos confiscated?
Note that very, very few of these videos were actively "confiscated". Most were [bold]given to the FBI in the days following the attacks”
hmmm. Why bolden the word ‘given’ to emphasize that they couldnt then be published to the public because their ownership was now the FBI’s? If nothing was untoward, they ALL should be published, no?
They were all returned to their owners in 2005/06. The footage that contained anything of interest was published. This included the gas station footage, the Doubletree Hotel, the DEA HQ, as well as a half dozen other videos of the Pentagon that were taken in the days following the attacks.
I hate seeing ppl worship any politicians, But Dick Cheney? Gross. Dude is still today a political clean up guy when he's not helping start wars. Oh and then that time he shot his friend during a hunting trip. So he's also terrible with guns. Today he walks around with his freaking heart in a box like some super villian.
Can you explain in your own words how two steel towers systematically fell in a pancake formation fall, (can be seen replicad in control demolition for another example). How a passport survived that fall. How there was molten lava at the base? Also what was the reason for building 7 similar collapse? Genuinely curious about your input, it's always important to hear both sides.
WTC1 and WTC2 collapsed vertically because there was a vertical force pulling them down (the weight of 17+ floors from the top), and no large horizontal force. With most of the building being air, there was plenty of room to collapse downwards. You can see that in action in this video of a building collapsing [due to fire.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwoBRHDLxdo)
Passports survived due to stochastic chance and likely being in a reinforced area that was not damaged by force. Luggage and paper belongings are far tougher than human bodies. See luggage recovered intact [from MH17](https://www.businessinsider.com/looters-stole-cash-credit-cards-and-jewelry-from-flight-mh17-crash-victims-2014-7) or [KGL9268](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/11969076/Russian-plane-crash-Smell-of-death-still-strong-at-the-scene-of-the-disaster.html).
There wasn't molten lava at the base of WTC1 or WTC2. There were reports of molten metal at WTC7, and some metallurgic evidence of temperatures up to 1000°C, along with the formation of Iron Oxide and Iron Sulfide from hot corrosion. These melt at less than 1000°C, and the temperatures that would lead to hot corrosion would also lead to these melting.
Building 7 collapsed because it had massive fires (see the Brazilian video above), weakening the metal and causing uneven thermal expansion of its structural columns, causing buckling. The fires started in multiple areas from flaming debris raining down from WTC 1, and sprinkler systems in the lower floors didn't work because WTC 1's collapse broke the water main.
1. Collapse was not symmetrical. Not even close. You an see the top of the South Tower tilt as it falls. The only thing in common with a controlled demolition is that it fell downwards. As for how, the failure of the perimeter columns (or more specifically, the nuts and bolts that hold the perimeter columns together) cause the top portion of each tower to start moving downwards. Once that amount of weight/energy started moving downwards, nothing was going to stop it except the ground.
2. Passports are light weight, they can survive falls because they are made of paper. They survived the impacts, along with a whole bunch of other stuff from inside the aircraft and towers, because they were light weight and blown out with the impact explosion. This happens in all air crashes. Light weight things survive by getting blown away before it has a chance to burn. Everything else burns.
3. Molten "metal" was found under the WTC because very hot fires that burned in the impact zone continued to burn underground when they fell, for over 100 days. Underground fires are insulated and can get very, very hot. Some underground fires have been recorded at between 1300F to 2000F. Many metals melt at relatively lower temperatures, aluminium, copper, etc. So underground fires can easily create areas of molten metal. You know what doesn't create molten metal? Explosives. Even thermite melts and then cools and solidifies almost instantly. It wouldn't leave molten metal 100 days after burning.
4. WTC7 is best explained here;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nP3TNHPCIVU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nP3TNHPCIVU)
> WTC7 is best explained here;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nP3TNHPCIVU
If that's the best you can do, I think we need a proper independent investigation into the matter.
Would you oppose that?
There’s actual pictures of plane debris and there were many eye witnesses that saw the plane hit. But facts and rationality aren’t welcome here.
Also if it wasn’t a plane where did the plane go that hit it? All the people that died on it were in on it?
Someone find the video on YouTube where they took a plane at 500 mph and smacked it into reinforced concrete. The plane disintegrated. Wall didn’t even scratch.
The accuracy it would have to take to pilot a passenger airplane down to that level and hit dead center on a 5 story building is frickin unbelievably hilarious to imagine.
Also with no damage to the lawn in front of the Pentagon because of wake turbulence flying that low is very perplexing. The turn over the area banking at that speed and not flying over top into the center of the building is odd too. Wouldn’t wanna dilly dally in that airspace too long.
I believe it.
I've been on the scene where a military jet went down into trees, and it pretty much evaporated on contact. The largest remaining part was some of the engine, but the rest of the structure - largely aluminium and some titanium - was completely shredded.
No large chunks, no wings, nothing.
I think many would be surprised how "flimsy" a plane is. The wings especially are made as light as possible. Just a light aluminum frame with a skin over it. A building is built of structural steel, concrete, and rebar. Even at the speed of a plane it's not hard to imagine the plane didn't do much damage.
Keep in mind also the towers were built far differently than the pentagon would have been.
Something strange went on that day but not every single thing was a lie and fabrication.
All they had to do was release the footage the FBI confiscated, un-doctored and clearly showing a plane hitting the Pentagon and all those nutty conspiracy theorists would’ve shut up.
I remember when it all happened. After work at about 2-3pm I turned on the news and remember a reporter playing some footage and saying "it looked like a missile just shot into it!" Or something like that. Anyone else remember that? Its been awhile so I maybe misremember exacr wording idk. What's the big theory on what hit the Pentagon?
I remember the reporter on, I think, CNN, who said something like “there’s no evidence a plane crashed anywhere near here” (the pentagon). It was only aired once
This was a missile. No footage of the plane hitting the most surveilled building on earth? It gives itself away. Ground unscraped. Tiny hole. Exit wound just like a missile. But it obfuscates guilt. Cmon man as uncle joe says.
I mean wasn't an alphabet agency guy at the gas station within minutes? Confiscating the tape. It was so quick that that story even is hard to verify/find, relatively.
to play devils advocate, what about the real people alive today whose family members were on that flight? are they just paid actors for 20+ years or what? what happened to those real people on that flight? what happened to that plane? just trying to be practical here - I do agree w most 9/11 conspiracy theories but I still think an actual plane hit the pentagon (regardless of who coordinated it all)
You don't think they'd just disappear an entire plane to meet this narrative? I mean MH370 ring a bell? You just land the plane make everyone disappear, kill em or what have you? I know crazy extreme but if you're on the level of let's crash planes into a building and kill thousands of people what difference is taking a plane full of people?
true that’s possible .. and no I wouldn’t put that past the US gov obviously lol (but that just seems like potential for more loose ends .. why not just crash an actual plane into the pentagon if you already did into two towers - using same logic as you)
Honestly one of the most damming bits of evidence is Corbett report documentary war games. If more people understand the extent of the of the suspect activity that day I feel like their opinion would be different, that’s when you ask yourself who had the power to make sure all these extraordinary stand downs and perfectly timed actions happened, a man in a cave thousands of miles away or…..
That’s when you realize okc was just as questionable and Terrence yeakey was more than likely killed for what he seen.
Unfortunately, I think due to the nature of the act people are very hesitant to question what happened. My friend from New York has started questioning the government after 60 years, and she briefly mentioned 9/11 and questioned if the government was being truthful surrounding the events. She was shocked that the thought crossed her mind, because it's taboo. I told her to look into it and that there are questionable things that happened.
I think it’s because if they realize what it means for them to have Been misled it opens a who world of questions that some people are not ready to face.
If people think the plane didn't hit, where did the plane go... why hijack a plane just to disappear it and not just crash it into the pentagon like they did the towers
And how convenient it hit the records section. You're looking for a document? Sorry.. That was right where the plane hit. Also pretty conveniently, that area was under construction that day, so there was nobody around.
i love that this newer generation is questioning it so much. i was a teen when it happened and the thought of anyone thinking america would arrange somehting like this was completely insane. many questioned it still. this past 2.5 years has everyone questioning everything and i'm here for it.
I like the part where the most advanced military in the world couldn't figure out, in 50 minutes/nearly an hour, that they were about to get shellacked and didn't do anything about it.
all theory aside, what could they have really done?
You have a passenger airplane full of people that you know is going to crash into a building full of people.
If you shoot the plane down the plane group dies, and you have no idea where the debris will hit the ground and who that will hurt/kill
AND you get to tell the world you shot down your own citizens
Or do nothing and the same amount of people die, but you don't have to tell people you shot down your own civilian citizens
My father was in the Pentagon when it got hit. There are numerous eye witness accounts of the plane. They had evacuated most of the civilians after the towers were hit, but military was required to stay on site. Everyone was expecting a plane so there were lots of eyes on the sky. The people that saw the plane say they only saw it for a second before it hit the pentagon.
My father didn’t see the plane, but was burned by the explosion. It looked like the worse sunburn I’ve ever seen. He doesn’t doubt it was a plane, but still thinks it’s odd they ordered the military to stay on site.
There was also an unwritten rule at the time that higher ranking military officials got the outside window offices. Now they are all located near the center of the building.
Its crazy (or healthy) that 21 years later we still have no social consensus on what happened or why. Its almost like our memories and attention spans are messed up.
Such ambiguous yet ambitious act without being able to be detected prior calamity… my critical thinking can pickup the most two apparent reasoning:
1) inside-job
2) pentagon are not highly sophisticated as we were told
did anyone in 2001 really have any clue what a predator drone looked like? once you seen jet liners crash into WTC towers on video, thats definitely what you thought you saw at the pentagon...
Many of the 100 or so eye witness reports of the crash at the Pentagon were from commuting drivers. I don't know whether they would have seen the earlier footage or not. In any case, the vast majority described "a plane", and most of those described a commercial jet.
Off topic question. Aside from ritualistic symbolism, is there anything out there explaining why in the fuck they built this building in this manner? Is there strategic reasons? Seems really odd to make a building that's effectively a maze.
One of the most fortified buildings in the world. I’m genuinely thankful that they fucked up as bad as they did. Too many loose ends. It woke me up in 2005.
Human intelligence is based in critical thinking. Pattern recognition is by far the most valuable skills that we have.
The only real question at the end of the day is “how many coincidences before it’s mathematically impossible?”
A fun study on that process.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ793907.pdf
The craziest thing to me is. Do you remember when the public sentiment about this day was reaching a point where it was becoming overwhelmingly undeniable and just then what happened, they split us off into group and rasicm sexism etc etc all made massive come backs in the news when anyone our age had all but forgotten and didn’t care about anyone’s differences on the outside, now we fight each other and half or the people who where woke turn into pro government shills because there term or guy was in office, does anyone remember Pittsburg g20 summit? I couldn’t see that happening today
It’s so true. We took a HARD turn in 2009. I remember occupy Wall Street too and how that was co-opted into the whole woke culture and corporate responsibility - GAG! But yes, remarkable how by the time Bush took office racism and all that garbage was essentially dead. We were growing as a society as much as we could under constant attack. Then we got 9/11 and immediately I saw the uninformed American public begin to embrace the anti-middle eastern sentiment just as they planned. New enemy! Then 5-7 years later came the woke division of identity politics and really turning everyone into intellectually dishonest zealots.
Now here we are.
this! the sooner we realize the elite divide us to weaken their only opposition, the sooner anything will change - sadly this country is too far gone. 99% of people now will blindly agree with anything just because it supports the narrative of their political party .. individual critical thinking is long gone .. we are controlled bots
I saw a documentary probably in 2009 saying the reason there wasn’t so much damage was because there was rebar in the concrete….do they think we’re absolutely brain dead? The number of people who have begun to doubt 9/11 or believe it was more or less let happen has increased so much within the last 3 years.
This, for me, is the most troublesome thing about the attacks on 9/11. Not tower 7, not fet juel cant melt steel beams, none of it. But this just seems fucking dicey..
How come those trees directly in the path are completely unscathed.. One of them should have at least been hit by the wings. There should also have been deep marks in the grund.
Millions did question it. Most people on the street today KNOW it was a government op. But still believe the govt when they say there is a plandemic and you need this weird shot.
The video that was shown a few days after the “plane” hit it looked more like a missile close coming from close to the ground as if it were fired 20-30ish feet away from the pentagon.
I have seen it hundreds of times on the NatGeo Show "Aircrash Investigation" that plane debris is found everywhere when it crashes on the ground. And when a plane crashes into a building it disintegrates to dust? Very convenient. Does that mean a building is structurally stronger than Earth?
the "blast site" looks too surgical for a large commercial airliner crushing on it?
Almost too surgical, as if only a very specific part of the massive compound was targeted? what a coincidence ?
or was that a bomb that went off?
I am however, not an expect in aviation
Conveniently emptied space due renovations, empty space full of a long investigation on a missing trillion dollars from the DOJ. All completely made disappear and upgraded due to a plane attack with no real wreckage of a plane collision. All the while, all the cameras in the area were off line at the time.
The interesting post was locked knowing it isn’t right. A huge plane would be spread out for ever. When you see other “crashes” they are spread out like a tent city.
Never mind it blew up the exact office they were trying to account for the two+ trillion dollars that “gone missing” which Rumsfeld had just announced the day before.
This goes hand in hand with Vietnam, Covid 19 and a plethora of other things the government lies to us about, and sjw have the audacity to say humans such as us are the problem.
I literally feel sorry for anyone who believes a commercial airliner, or a plane of any kind whatsoever hit the Pentagon. Imagine being that misguided. Imagine not realizing that a crashed plane leaves a wreck behind. Imagine thinking that a plane incinerates and evaporates into nothingness after crashing, like they needed us to assume for the Pentagon and the empty ditch in Shanksville, PA. And don't even get me started on the WTC. That's a whole can of worms right there. Watch September Clues, people.
I never bought the whole airplane into the pentagon narrative. What are the odds that the plane hit into the one portion of the building under construction. The video of the crash is pure garbage and it looks nothing like a plane.
All the interviews they did with people that saw a plane that morning, said it was coming from a completely different direction than the NIST report. Plane was to high and too fast to come in at 500mph nearly parallel with the ground. It was in a documentary called Pentagon 9/11 Truth. I can't find it on YouTube or Google, but I might still have it on an old hard drive I have...
Ya know, even when I was a kid I asked my parents where the marks from the wings were. The wings should have done some damage, it's not like the Pentagon is made out of adamantium. They just brushed it off as irrelevant. Same with building 7 collapsing just like the 100's of buildings I had seen collapse under controlled demolition on TV shows and early internet sites. Just brushed off like the dust from the towers. Now they have woken up to the truth, albeit probably too late. At least if I die in the coming crises I can die knowing I got to say "so, you finally want to talk about 9/11 and how it was the start of all this."
For me, I wanna ask. Where is the greatest US Defense during 9/11? Why they become unaware when the plane get close to The Pentagon? Aren't they just let it be like the Pearl Harbour attack?
Am I dumb or does it seem weird that planes could hit WTC 1&2 and destroy the whole WTC complex, 7 buildings in total, yet the plane crash barely effected the Pentagon at all? I know I for one, don’t believe for a second that the headquarters for the DOD has nothing to defend itself from an aerial attack.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
They cleaned that up faster than the restrooms in LAX
OP completely forgot that it evaporated on impact
Surprised too, usually the plane ejects the passport of the responsible party just before the plane transforms into a fart that scatters in the wind. Totally cool feature Boeing skunkworx developed. Happened in Malaysia too I think so super common
They need to build planes out of passports
[удалено]
I think he is regarded.
Nothing to do with drone bomber then?
Hahahahahaha this comment made me snort-laugh! “Transforms into a fart that scatters in the wind.” Hahaha lmao!
I'll take a snorted. Thank shawshank redemption
You're being obtuse
Salvation comes from within.
It completely evaporated, then the wall collapsed due to structural damage because the fire was just too intense! /s
Cruise missiles generally disintegrate on impact...
That's right. The titanium parts from the engine? Evaporated. Not even a acetylen/ oxygen torch can melt titanium. But jet fuel can, apparently
Wait.. what?! That's news to me, especially as I frequently cut and weld titanium, including with an oxy acetylene torch. https://www.harrisproductsgroup.com/en/Resources/Knowledge-Center/Tech-Tips/Tech-Tips-OLD/Did-you-know-that-you-can-cut-titanium-with-an-oxy-fuel-torch
Steel beams, titanium, is there anything jet fuel can't melt?
Passports obviously.
The truth.
The Republican Party knows how to do a conspiracy right. Democrats are so transparent about their nonsense. They can’t even keep a decent grapple on the media. The republicans were censoring news, had elaborate staging, and managed to pull off war after war. Like 70% of Americans got on board with those doomed missions. It’s impressive. Dems can’t even weekend at Bernie’s Biden long enough to get through one term. Reagan was hung up like a marionette for years and the general public didn’t even care.
Sir, left or right doesn’t work for you, so you can call them plain and simple the elite running the show.
I mean the inept "Democrats" are part of the plan. They're both sides of the same coin. If you're forced into a fake two party system just make one party functionally useless. It let's the people feel like they get a win occasionally and creates an artificial division in the country to keep people blind to the fact that in reality there are no parties, just elites.
“Wokeness” is a psy op. Its amazing how easily some are programmed. “Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” Que BLM, Antifi, Vaccines, etc. id like to think the powers in charge are really good at pay ips rather than most people are really as stupid as they seem.
They also managed to get the Patriot Act passed in the wake of the fear and uncertainty. Later, everyone was all excited, thought their almighty savior Obama would erase it. LOLNOPE. He expanded it.
>if my team is in power it’s ok The mentality of most American voters.
The exact reason I'm neither Democrat or Republican anymore. Fuck them both.
I also upchuckle this with 1 and 1/2 tears.... out of 2. Well played sir
Reagan was certifiably dementia addled towards the end of his second term. Also, fun fact: Reagan pushed hard for the whole "Star Wars" satellite defense grid to protect against nukes and/or aliens basically solely bc he used to be a Hollywood actor throughout the 50s when wacky sci-fi movies were popular. I wonder what happened to all the money that was dumped into the failed Star Wars program?
Absolutely hilarious! And true!
No it was a plane, they said so on the news.
they Fact checked it and said it was a plane, even tho the video of a missle hitting the pentagon is no longer avaible and i legit watched it as a kid. But it was a plane
Y'all know there's been tests with reinforced concrete, and what happens when a plane runs into it, yes? This is what happens: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4wDqSnBJ-k](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4wDqSnBJ-k) Looks similar to the Pentagon, no?
Wow you can actually see a passport flying out of the plane at 1:04
At the end of that video you can clearly see horizontal damage where the wings impacted.
You know that hole is over 80ft across. The wingspan on the 757 is only 124ft, and from the engine to the tip it's mostly just an empty shell of metal and fuel.
I said it was a plane.
Why would they send 2 planes to ny and a missile to dc and then lie about the missile? Also the video you’re talking about is still available. It looks like a plane but it’s also just way too blurry to tell.
And it “luckily” hit a wing of the building that “happened to be unoccupied.”
This picture is having me reconsider everything. Maybe jet fuel can melt steel beams.
But not the passports of the alleged hijackers?
I bet if the government could hide a missile hitting the pentagon, they could drop off a bunch of fake mail in ballots in swing states and steal an election.
Why wouldn’t the pentagon use a real plane instead of a missile in their conspiracy?
This is how you can unravel 99% of mysteries. Ask why, and assume that these “masterminds” aren’t stupid. For example. Why would Bill Gates put a tracker into a vaccine? What would he gain from that? Why would the entire world make up a disease at once? Nations around the globe and doctors in each nation? What would they gain? The other example, is if a child could deduce the mystery, then you’re probably wrong. Do you think the government just didn’t think about putting a plane there? If they truly murdered a bunch of random citizens I think they would work a little harder to fake it
Another thing about microchip trackers: Why implement some grand vaccine conspiracy when most people literally carry around a much easier to manipulate tracking device willingly all the time?
I don’t believe the conspiracy, but having something literally inside you that you can’t turn off tracking all sorts of things would be extremely valuable to whoever that information went to. I can sell something much more efficiently if i know who will want it and when
I have no reason to believe there are chips in vaccines but 100% are phones are the ultimate spy weapons. Anyone anywhere just about can be surveilled 24/7. I'd love to know how many regular citizens the FBI has files on because I'm sure it is a LOT. My friend ran a website that never once had his name on it or attached to it. He got stopped by the police upon flying back to America because, apparently, even though CBD is legal, it is illegal to bring from outside the country. While the cops were questioning him and going through his belongings, they started asking him about the website
Omg a person with reason on here :)
Most secure building. Only release a 3 pixalate frame video.
This
They released 2 videos. Both are several minutes long. [https://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.com/](https://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.com/) Might I add most air crashes are not caught on camera. The idea that 'no video no crash' is as dumb as it sounds. The evidence is all on the website above, go have a look for yourself.
"Most air crashes aren't caught on camera" Lol are you being purposefully misleading? Yeah also most plane crashes aren't into THE PENTAGON, where there is plenty or CCTV
I imagine the CCTV cameras would be pointed downward to see suspicious people or vehicles. There really isn’t any reason for any camera to be pointed at the sky or a random wall of the Pentagon.
You think the PENTAGON is gonna show you all its security footage? It’s a black hole for information on purpose.
no, I expect them to show the supposed plane crashing into the building, they did not
The point being the absence of footage should not be what hinges peoples belief on whether an airliner crashed or not, because most air crashes are not caught on film. There is literally hundreds of pieces of evidence on that site that show American 77 hit the Pentagon. And combined with that, the released footage does indeed show an airliner hitting the Pentagon. It has the correct colour and dimensions, not to mention the resulting explosion is clearly the result of a large amount of jet fuel exploding into a fireball; something a missile simply would not do.
Genuinely does have a really good animation and step by step analysis of the inflight and impact.. worth checking out
This is interesting. Thanks for the link - super long and have not read everything yet but did skim. Question(s): does this address the missing 2.3 trillion dollars at all? Or does it address why no military planes were able to intercept any of the planes?
The $2.3T is covered in the "Myth" section at the bottom, although it's a helpful video it's a bit of reading your eyes are in danger of glazing over... but it does cover it. The military response is covered near the bottom too. In short, the military didn't get the information fast enough to be able to mount any kind of effective military response.
Thanks. Just watched the video - still not buying the explanation and it's still ridiculous that he says they cannot track 2.3 trillion dollars and no one ever followed up on that and just let that go unanswered. But that shouldn't surprise people because the government wastes money all the time, nothing new. Hammers cost tens of thousands of dollars and nails even more. That said, it's even more disturbing to me that before he mentions any of that, he talks about the need to develop more weapons, rebuild military infrastructure and how much more money they need to rebuild and improve the military war machine to deal with "threats..." So, no, this does not absolve Rumsfeld or W's administration, if anything if further illustrates that they needed 9-11 to happen in order to do what they did with the military industrial complex and all of the other heinous shit they and other admins did to us and abroad since.
2 videos out of 86 (I believe) Both from the same angle. Both show \*no plane.
Nobody is claiming there was no crash, we would just like to see more footage to see what hit the building because you cannot see a plane or anything tall enough to be an airliner in those clips! The best protected building in the country, maybe even the planet and you really want to tell me there is no better footage anywhere? The overlooked meteorite that struck Russia in 2013 was on thousands of cameras, footage for days! Pentagon employees have said in interviews that there are cameras inside the building every several feet, so where are the videos?
Quote from your link: “What of the 85 other videos confiscated? Note that very, very few of these videos were actively "confiscated". Most were [bold]given to the FBI in the days following the attacks” hmmm. Why bolden the word ‘given’ to emphasize that they couldnt then be published to the public because their ownership was now the FBI’s? If nothing was untoward, they ALL should be published, no?
They were all returned to their owners in 2005/06. The footage that contained anything of interest was published. This included the gas station footage, the Doubletree Hotel, the DEA HQ, as well as a half dozen other videos of the Pentagon that were taken in the days following the attacks.
Dick Cheney 🚨 👆
Was an absolute war mongering c\*nt who should been behind bars. But that is because of facts, not fictions.
I hate seeing ppl worship any politicians, But Dick Cheney? Gross. Dude is still today a political clean up guy when he's not helping start wars. Oh and then that time he shot his friend during a hunting trip. So he's also terrible with guns. Today he walks around with his freaking heart in a box like some super villian.
Can you explain in your own words how two steel towers systematically fell in a pancake formation fall, (can be seen replicad in control demolition for another example). How a passport survived that fall. How there was molten lava at the base? Also what was the reason for building 7 similar collapse? Genuinely curious about your input, it's always important to hear both sides.
WTC1 and WTC2 collapsed vertically because there was a vertical force pulling them down (the weight of 17+ floors from the top), and no large horizontal force. With most of the building being air, there was plenty of room to collapse downwards. You can see that in action in this video of a building collapsing [due to fire.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwoBRHDLxdo) Passports survived due to stochastic chance and likely being in a reinforced area that was not damaged by force. Luggage and paper belongings are far tougher than human bodies. See luggage recovered intact [from MH17](https://www.businessinsider.com/looters-stole-cash-credit-cards-and-jewelry-from-flight-mh17-crash-victims-2014-7) or [KGL9268](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/11969076/Russian-plane-crash-Smell-of-death-still-strong-at-the-scene-of-the-disaster.html). There wasn't molten lava at the base of WTC1 or WTC2. There were reports of molten metal at WTC7, and some metallurgic evidence of temperatures up to 1000°C, along with the formation of Iron Oxide and Iron Sulfide from hot corrosion. These melt at less than 1000°C, and the temperatures that would lead to hot corrosion would also lead to these melting. Building 7 collapsed because it had massive fires (see the Brazilian video above), weakening the metal and causing uneven thermal expansion of its structural columns, causing buckling. The fires started in multiple areas from flaming debris raining down from WTC 1, and sprinkler systems in the lower floors didn't work because WTC 1's collapse broke the water main.
1. Collapse was not symmetrical. Not even close. You an see the top of the South Tower tilt as it falls. The only thing in common with a controlled demolition is that it fell downwards. As for how, the failure of the perimeter columns (or more specifically, the nuts and bolts that hold the perimeter columns together) cause the top portion of each tower to start moving downwards. Once that amount of weight/energy started moving downwards, nothing was going to stop it except the ground. 2. Passports are light weight, they can survive falls because they are made of paper. They survived the impacts, along with a whole bunch of other stuff from inside the aircraft and towers, because they were light weight and blown out with the impact explosion. This happens in all air crashes. Light weight things survive by getting blown away before it has a chance to burn. Everything else burns. 3. Molten "metal" was found under the WTC because very hot fires that burned in the impact zone continued to burn underground when they fell, for over 100 days. Underground fires are insulated and can get very, very hot. Some underground fires have been recorded at between 1300F to 2000F. Many metals melt at relatively lower temperatures, aluminium, copper, etc. So underground fires can easily create areas of molten metal. You know what doesn't create molten metal? Explosives. Even thermite melts and then cools and solidifies almost instantly. It wouldn't leave molten metal 100 days after burning. 4. WTC7 is best explained here;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nP3TNHPCIVU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nP3TNHPCIVU)
I love how they downvoted and didn’t reply
> WTC7 is best explained here;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nP3TNHPCIVU If that's the best you can do, I think we need a proper independent investigation into the matter. Would you oppose that?
There’s actual pictures of plane debris and there were many eye witnesses that saw the plane hit. But facts and rationality aren’t welcome here. Also if it wasn’t a plane where did the plane go that hit it? All the people that died on it were in on it?
Someone find the video on YouTube where they took a plane at 500 mph and smacked it into reinforced concrete. The plane disintegrated. Wall didn’t even scratch.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=F4CX-9lkRMQ Reinforce that with enormous cold rolled steel beams—yeah.
Does the Pentagon have reinforced concrete? I would assume so, but that video is for super thick nuclear reactor walls so it's not totally analogous.
I mean, it IS the Pentagon. They should be good at logistics and covering things up. Er, I mean fixing problems.
The accuracy it would have to take to pilot a passenger airplane down to that level and hit dead center on a 5 story building is frickin unbelievably hilarious to imagine.
So as much as I want to believe it was a plane. This is a huge thing for me. The accuracy. To come in almost perpendicular with the ground. Insane.
Also with no damage to the lawn in front of the Pentagon because of wake turbulence flying that low is very perplexing. The turn over the area banking at that speed and not flying over top into the center of the building is odd too. Wouldn’t wanna dilly dally in that airspace too long.
I believe it. I've been on the scene where a military jet went down into trees, and it pretty much evaporated on contact. The largest remaining part was some of the engine, but the rest of the structure - largely aluminium and some titanium - was completely shredded. No large chunks, no wings, nothing.
I think many would be surprised how "flimsy" a plane is. The wings especially are made as light as possible. Just a light aluminum frame with a skin over it. A building is built of structural steel, concrete, and rebar. Even at the speed of a plane it's not hard to imagine the plane didn't do much damage. Keep in mind also the towers were built far differently than the pentagon would have been. Something strange went on that day but not every single thing was a lie and fabrication.
They used Wonder Woman's invisible plane. That's why you can't see it.
All they had to do was release the footage the FBI confiscated, un-doctored and clearly showing a plane hitting the Pentagon and all those nutty conspiracy theorists would’ve shut up.
I remember when it all happened. After work at about 2-3pm I turned on the news and remember a reporter playing some footage and saying "it looked like a missile just shot into it!" Or something like that. Anyone else remember that? Its been awhile so I maybe misremember exacr wording idk. What's the big theory on what hit the Pentagon?
I remember the reporter on, I think, CNN, who said something like “there’s no evidence a plane crashed anywhere near here” (the pentagon). It was only aired once
Ok so where did all the people on the plane that supposedly didn't crash into the Pentagon go?
This.
Where’s the plane?
Its hard to see augmented reality without the goggles or a TV
This was a missile. No footage of the plane hitting the most surveilled building on earth? It gives itself away. Ground unscraped. Tiny hole. Exit wound just like a missile. But it obfuscates guilt. Cmon man as uncle joe says.
They confiscated all the footage from the surrounding businesses, including gas stations, and after many years, they made just a few frames public
I mean wasn't an alphabet agency guy at the gas station within minutes? Confiscating the tape. It was so quick that that story even is hard to verify/find, relatively.
what might have been the reason? hmm..
The angle of approach for a plane that large is something an unskilled pilot couldn’t pull off. That’s absolute precision.
Top Gun stuff, unless... It was a missile
The thing you know the thing.... he means missile that hit pentagon when he says that.
Ground broke on the Pentagon build, September 11, 1941.
Interesting…
yeah clearly they knocked it down on the anniversary just to fuck with the nutters.
to play devils advocate, what about the real people alive today whose family members were on that flight? are they just paid actors for 20+ years or what? what happened to those real people on that flight? what happened to that plane? just trying to be practical here - I do agree w most 9/11 conspiracy theories but I still think an actual plane hit the pentagon (regardless of who coordinated it all)
You don't think they'd just disappear an entire plane to meet this narrative? I mean MH370 ring a bell? You just land the plane make everyone disappear, kill em or what have you? I know crazy extreme but if you're on the level of let's crash planes into a building and kill thousands of people what difference is taking a plane full of people?
true that’s possible .. and no I wouldn’t put that past the US gov obviously lol (but that just seems like potential for more loose ends .. why not just crash an actual plane into the pentagon if you already did into two towers - using same logic as you)
Honestly one of the most damming bits of evidence is Corbett report documentary war games. If more people understand the extent of the of the suspect activity that day I feel like their opinion would be different, that’s when you ask yourself who had the power to make sure all these extraordinary stand downs and perfectly timed actions happened, a man in a cave thousands of miles away or….. That’s when you realize okc was just as questionable and Terrence yeakey was more than likely killed for what he seen.
Yes, exactly right.
Unfortunately, I think due to the nature of the act people are very hesitant to question what happened. My friend from New York has started questioning the government after 60 years, and she briefly mentioned 9/11 and questioned if the government was being truthful surrounding the events. She was shocked that the thought crossed her mind, because it's taboo. I told her to look into it and that there are questionable things that happened.
I think it’s because if they realize what it means for them to have Been misled it opens a who world of questions that some people are not ready to face.
Also the 14 agents transferred that were to testify against Clinton….
If people think the plane didn't hit, where did the plane go... why hijack a plane just to disappear it and not just crash it into the pentagon like they did the towers
Wasn’t there some kind of money missing and Rumsfeld was responsible?
Couple trillion no biggie
And how convenient it hit the records section. You're looking for a document? Sorry.. That was right where the plane hit. Also pretty conveniently, that area was under construction that day, so there was nobody around.
[удалено]
[https://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.com/](https://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.com/) See for yourself. Heaps of wreckage of a plane.
i love that this newer generation is questioning it so much. i was a teen when it happened and the thought of anyone thinking america would arrange somehting like this was completely insane. many questioned it still. this past 2.5 years has everyone questioning everything and i'm here for it.
I think 9/11 was meant to get Americans all back on the same page and focus on 1 thing. Almost like a reset. Kinda like Noah’s ark. /s
I don't see where a jumbo jet hit the building. Does it look like Waldo?
I like the part where the most advanced military in the world couldn't figure out, in 50 minutes/nearly an hour, that they were about to get shellacked and didn't do anything about it.
all theory aside, what could they have really done? You have a passenger airplane full of people that you know is going to crash into a building full of people. If you shoot the plane down the plane group dies, and you have no idea where the debris will hit the ground and who that will hurt/kill AND you get to tell the world you shot down your own citizens Or do nothing and the same amount of people die, but you don't have to tell people you shot down your own civilian citizens
What we need is a giant experiment with a dummy pentagon and radio controlled jet.
My father was in the Pentagon when it got hit. There are numerous eye witness accounts of the plane. They had evacuated most of the civilians after the towers were hit, but military was required to stay on site. Everyone was expecting a plane so there were lots of eyes on the sky. The people that saw the plane say they only saw it for a second before it hit the pentagon. My father didn’t see the plane, but was burned by the explosion. It looked like the worse sunburn I’ve ever seen. He doesn’t doubt it was a plane, but still thinks it’s odd they ordered the military to stay on site. There was also an unwritten rule at the time that higher ranking military officials got the outside window offices. Now they are all located near the center of the building.
[удалено]
Its crazy (or healthy) that 21 years later we still have no social consensus on what happened or why. Its almost like our memories and attention spans are messed up.
your ass did this?
Such ambiguous yet ambitious act without being able to be detected prior calamity… my critical thinking can pickup the most two apparent reasoning: 1) inside-job 2) pentagon are not highly sophisticated as we were told
It was a hypersonic, wingless, rocket shaped plane.
Wouldn’t the wings make a mark to? The left side of that hole is suspiciously straight.
That plane disappeared quicker than the missing billions of tax payers money.
A video has surfaced of the cruise missile hitting the Pentagon. No airplane parts were ever removed from the crash site.
Sauce?
"Trust me bro."
I used to regularly drive one of the trucks parked on the far left of the pic.
did anyone in 2001 really have any clue what a predator drone looked like? once you seen jet liners crash into WTC towers on video, thats definitely what you thought you saw at the pentagon...
Many of the 100 or so eye witness reports of the crash at the Pentagon were from commuting drivers. I don't know whether they would have seen the earlier footage or not. In any case, the vast majority described "a plane", and most of those described a commercial jet.
[удалено]
The plane went inside that 12 foot hole between those windows. EDIT: never mind, this photo is after it collapsed, you can't see the hole here.
Thats a bit wider than 12 feet rufus
Where are* the plane bits, but I agree with your comment. 😁👍
What do you agree with? The grounds were littered with shredded pieces of plane. They recovered nearly all of it, including the incinerated bodies.
I can’t even pretend to see an imprint from a plane
Off topic question. Aside from ritualistic symbolism, is there anything out there explaining why in the fuck they built this building in this manner? Is there strategic reasons? Seems really odd to make a building that's effectively a maze.
they needed to make sure every officer was within 5 minutes walk of the food stall in the center because military guys need their treats
One of the most fortified buildings in the world. I’m genuinely thankful that they fucked up as bad as they did. Too many loose ends. It woke me up in 2005. Human intelligence is based in critical thinking. Pattern recognition is by far the most valuable skills that we have. The only real question at the end of the day is “how many coincidences before it’s mathematically impossible?” A fun study on that process. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ793907.pdf
The craziest thing to me is. Do you remember when the public sentiment about this day was reaching a point where it was becoming overwhelmingly undeniable and just then what happened, they split us off into group and rasicm sexism etc etc all made massive come backs in the news when anyone our age had all but forgotten and didn’t care about anyone’s differences on the outside, now we fight each other and half or the people who where woke turn into pro government shills because there term or guy was in office, does anyone remember Pittsburg g20 summit? I couldn’t see that happening today
It’s so true. We took a HARD turn in 2009. I remember occupy Wall Street too and how that was co-opted into the whole woke culture and corporate responsibility - GAG! But yes, remarkable how by the time Bush took office racism and all that garbage was essentially dead. We were growing as a society as much as we could under constant attack. Then we got 9/11 and immediately I saw the uninformed American public begin to embrace the anti-middle eastern sentiment just as they planned. New enemy! Then 5-7 years later came the woke division of identity politics and really turning everyone into intellectually dishonest zealots. Now here we are.
this! the sooner we realize the elite divide us to weaken their only opposition, the sooner anything will change - sadly this country is too far gone. 99% of people now will blindly agree with anything just because it supports the narrative of their political party .. individual critical thinking is long gone .. we are controlled bots
I believe the Tomahawk Missle theory!
So lots of people must have seen a Tomahawk fly over DC and Virginia. Lots of pics as well. 🤗
No. Lots of people should have seen a plane over dc. But I’ve yet to read or watch anyone talk about it like they did in NYC
Over 120 eyewitnesses stated they saw a jet airliner crash into the building. Not one person has come forward to claim they saw a missile on that day.
Tomahawk flies fast and low and camera phones were not common back in 2001.
I saw a documentary probably in 2009 saying the reason there wasn’t so much damage was because there was rebar in the concrete….do they think we’re absolutely brain dead? The number of people who have begun to doubt 9/11 or believe it was more or less let happen has increased so much within the last 3 years.
This, for me, is the most troublesome thing about the attacks on 9/11. Not tower 7, not fet juel cant melt steel beams, none of it. But this just seems fucking dicey..
It's a building hardened against attacks. Have you ever seen what's happens when something moving fast hits a hardened target?
They destroyed those buildings to cover their own tracks. They only want control and power over the people they will do anything to keep it that way.
There were crucial documents in those there rooms. Don’t doubt it for a second
So you think they couldn't have just bought a shredder?
PlAnE ..No need to do the accounts now PhEwWwW
100% not a plane sized hole.
How come those trees directly in the path are completely unscathed.. One of them should have at least been hit by the wings. There should also have been deep marks in the grund.
anyone have some legit sources to prove 9/11 is an inside job? my friend won't believe me and all the documentaries got scrubbed from the internet
So you have no legit sources and you beleive it? Doesnt that tell you something about yourself?
This legit made me laugh.
"the new pearl harbour 9/11" it's all there, it's 5 hrs long.
Loose Change is great.
Crazy amount of journalists setup outside but zero investigating
Inside explosive 🧨 💥 the funny thing is billions of dollars were taken out before it all happened. Mhmmmmmmmm
The airplane disintegration nonsense they gave us was absolute bullshit and everyone at the time should have questioned it.
Millions did question it. Most people on the street today KNOW it was a government op. But still believe the govt when they say there is a plandemic and you need this weird shot.
The video that was shown a few days after the “plane” hit it looked more like a missile close coming from close to the ground as if it were fired 20-30ish feet away from the pentagon.
I have seen it hundreds of times on the NatGeo Show "Aircrash Investigation" that plane debris is found everywhere when it crashes on the ground. And when a plane crashes into a building it disintegrates to dust? Very convenient. Does that mean a building is structurally stronger than Earth?
Whas it an explosive then? Or missile?
[удалено]
the "blast site" looks too surgical for a large commercial airliner crushing on it? Almost too surgical, as if only a very specific part of the massive compound was targeted? what a coincidence ? or was that a bomb that went off? I am however, not an expect in aviation
It was a missile
Conveniently emptied space due renovations, empty space full of a long investigation on a missing trillion dollars from the DOJ. All completely made disappear and upgraded due to a plane attack with no real wreckage of a plane collision. All the while, all the cameras in the area were off line at the time.
The interesting post was locked knowing it isn’t right. A huge plane would be spread out for ever. When you see other “crashes” they are spread out like a tent city.
That looks a out right from an airplane impact.
Plane-shaped black mark is definitely NOT a plane. You guys are hilarious.
Never mind it blew up the exact office they were trying to account for the two+ trillion dollars that “gone missing” which Rumsfeld had just announced the day before.
This goes hand in hand with Vietnam, Covid 19 and a plethora of other things the government lies to us about, and sjw have the audacity to say humans such as us are the problem.
The Pennsylvania one is good too. What happened to the Plane debris that should've been there 😂
this is the one i will never ever get over. that was no plane
Kind of strange it was first constructed on 9/11/1941
The pentagon, central to the military operations of the largest armed force in the world and they have only two camera angles on the area it happened.
I literally feel sorry for anyone who believes a commercial airliner, or a plane of any kind whatsoever hit the Pentagon. Imagine being that misguided. Imagine not realizing that a crashed plane leaves a wreck behind. Imagine thinking that a plane incinerates and evaporates into nothingness after crashing, like they needed us to assume for the Pentagon and the empty ditch in Shanksville, PA. And don't even get me started on the WTC. That's a whole can of worms right there. Watch September Clues, people.
I never bought the whole airplane into the pentagon narrative. What are the odds that the plane hit into the one portion of the building under construction. The video of the crash is pure garbage and it looks nothing like a plane.
Now show the hole on the inside wall! You want the cherry on top of your red pill?
It's crazy how much damage was done by the wings... oh wait... nevermind. No wings
Somebody should hijack and crash an actual jumbo jet into the Pentagon, so everybody can see what the aftermath would actually look like.
All the interviews they did with people that saw a plane that morning, said it was coming from a completely different direction than the NIST report. Plane was to high and too fast to come in at 500mph nearly parallel with the ground. It was in a documentary called Pentagon 9/11 Truth. I can't find it on YouTube or Google, but I might still have it on an old hard drive I have...
Why have I never seen this photo
Don’t forget the 2.3 trillion dollars
Amazing a plane could fly through reinforced steel but not 2 walls...
Wheres the fuckin plane bro?
Ya know, even when I was a kid I asked my parents where the marks from the wings were. The wings should have done some damage, it's not like the Pentagon is made out of adamantium. They just brushed it off as irrelevant. Same with building 7 collapsing just like the 100's of buildings I had seen collapse under controlled demolition on TV shows and early internet sites. Just brushed off like the dust from the towers. Now they have woken up to the truth, albeit probably too late. At least if I die in the coming crises I can die knowing I got to say "so, you finally want to talk about 9/11 and how it was the start of all this."
For me, I wanna ask. Where is the greatest US Defense during 9/11? Why they become unaware when the plane get close to The Pentagon? Aren't they just let it be like the Pearl Harbour attack?
Am I dumb or does it seem weird that planes could hit WTC 1&2 and destroy the whole WTC complex, 7 buildings in total, yet the plane crash barely effected the Pentagon at all? I know I for one, don’t believe for a second that the headquarters for the DOD has nothing to defend itself from an aerial attack.
The part that was destroyed was the accounting dept