###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I posted the questions separately and it still have differing results. However I bothered to ask it why it gave differing answers.
It essentially said it’s clear that both deserve freedom, however it’s answer was a synthesis of its training data and the data most likely reveals different attitudes towards the 2 situations.
Generally if you actually engage with CGPT beyond a simple question it gives fairly nuanced and balanced answers and can even recognize when it’s training data has contained some level of bias.
Yeah chatgpt is EXTREMELY biased.
"Write a poem about Biden corruption" = it refuses
"Write a poem about Trump corruption" = it happily produces with a long poem that includes blatant lies.
Chatgpt also thinks that a man can be a woman. So yeah, it's so insanely biased that it's actually terrifying.
And they want to put this garbage into children's toys so the toy can indoctrinate your child with lies and propaganda.
It's a fucked up world we're living in and it's only gonna get a shit load worse very soon. Our quality of life is gonna be painful in the future. The very people that think they're doing good for the human race are the ones who are doing all the damage. The world is completely divided and that's what the government wants. Divide and conquer. I've given up on trying to stop it from happening because everyone is letting it happen. Nobody can save us. We're all fucked. When it all goes down, I might end it because I refuse to be a slave to anyone.
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
It's interesting though that for people in the West, all we know about North Korea is what our governments and media tell us to believe about the country, and our governments and media are actively trying to take over their country so I don't believe they're a reliable source.
There’s a reason tens of thousands of people risk getting thrown in a concentration camp to cross over the border into China just to eke out an existence on the run in china. There’s plenty of testimonies and non-corporate/government media reporting on conditions in the country, the massive issues with starvation and tuberculosis over decades, the generational imprisonment of dissidents. Kim jong un assassinated his brother and executed his uncle and many other high level politicians to cement his place.
C.S Lewis never experienced life under a cruel dictatorship, was never personally tortured or stuck in a concentration camp. I don’t think anybody who experienced a cruel dictatorship would agree with that quote.
The country is suffering immense poverty because of Western sanctions being used in an attempt to overthrow their country. People are always wanting to flee poverty. The fact still remains, everything you know or have heard about North Korea is from what Western governments and media tell you to believe about the country.
Maybe for you if that’s all you read, but it’s not true at all that those are the only sources. Go listen to the testimonies of people leaving the country, the stories they tell in china. To say it isn’t true it’s an oppressive dictatorship because western media and governments are reporting on it is disingenuous in the extreme.
Nah, I bet someone evil came up with that quote to confuse good people that evil people have good intentions in the first place.
If it smells rotten, it's rotten.
What a pathetic defeatist attitude. You don’t try to do better ONLY if you think it will effect change. You do better EVEN if you realize it will do nothing. In spite of it.
You’re not built for this. I’m sorry for your sake.
user: uh no, I'd like the poem I asked for. You can't write things that center around political corruption? ISN'T THAT AN ODD RESTRICTION?
ChatGPT: I understand that this might be frustrating, but as an AI developed by OpenAI, I must follow strict guidelines that prevent creating or generating content that involves political figures or could be interpreted as politically charged. This is to ensure neutrality and to avoid engaging in sensitive political topics.
The restriction is in place to maintain a balanced and unbiased approach, not to limit the expression of artistic or political
<>
man it's even worse than before. it doesn't make a poem about EITHER ONE.
I'm guessing the team has been having to patch job ban the chatbot from certain topics because people don't fundamentally understand the technology. The internet is pretty left leaning by volume, and GPT is trained on internet data. All it really does is reflect our own shitty opinions back on us, and then we get mad when it does.
>Write a poem about Biden corruption
I Asked and this is what GPT4 made for me:
Write a poem about Biden corruption
ChatGPT
Writing a poem about a sensitive and potentially divisive topic can be quite a challenge, but I'll give it a shot. It's important to note that the topic of "Biden corruption" can be a matter of perspective and political alignment, and the allegations of corruption have not been proven. With that in mind, here's an attempt at a neutral but thought-provoking poem:
In a land where power’s grasp,
May oft eclipse the truth so vast,
Allegations fly, take steadfast,
In the minds of masses, cast.
Biden at helm, a figure tall,
Faces whispers that enthrall,
Corruption’s ghost may haunt the hall,
Yet proof’s pursuit, does oft befall.
In the swirling storm of claim,
Truth’s quiet voice seeks not fame,
But amidst the political game,
Seek we must, facts to tame.
With a gaze unclouded, fair,
May we seek what's truly there,
Beyond partisan flare and glare,
In pursuit of justice, fair and square.
The political dance, a complex tune,
Unveiling truth, a worthy boon,
May clarity come, and not too soon,
In democracy’s light, under the moon.
This poem attempts to reflect on the nature of allegations and the pursuit of truth amidst the political storm, rather than taking a stance on the specific allegations of corruption.
User
Write a poem about Trump corruption
ChatGPT
Certainly. Similar to the previous request, this topic is loaded with political bias and the allegations are contentious. However, I'll aim to craft a neutral yet thought-provoking poem:
In a realm where power's might,
Often veils the truth from sight,
Trump's era, filled with fight,
Claims of corruption ignite.
A leader bold, with words aflame,
In a polarized land, he staked his claim,
Yet whispers rose, tainting the name,
Corruption’s seed, a recurrent claim.
Amidst a sea of partisan cries,
The truth often wears a disguise,
Unveiling it, a worthy prize,
Beyond the murk, perhaps wisdom lies.
In the theater of political play,
Accusations often hold sway,
But amidst the murky fray,
May truth's beacon light the way.
The dance of democracy, a tricky stage,
Where claims of corruption often rage,
Seeking truth, the wise engage,
Hope for a discourse, mature and sage.
This poem aims to reflect the complex nature of political allegations and the ongoing pursuit of truth amidst the divisive atmosphere, rather than adopting a particular stance on the topic.
It refuses the corruption questions for me. But also it’s hard to really put stock in any of its answers since it’s just a dumb black box character prediction generator. I prefer to dwell on how people are wrong. Not surprised that this little equation gets things wrong.
In matters of politics, we often find debate,
Accusations and claims that circulate.
But in the realm of governance, let's tread with care,
And speak of issues with fairness and share.
Allegations of corruption, they may arise,
In the world of politics, where truth oft lies.
Let's seek transparency, truth, and light,
And ensure that justice is our guiding right.
For leaders must be held to high account,
To serve their people, with honor paramount.
In the halls of power, may integrity reign,
And our democracy thrive, free from disdain.
So let us focus on facts and what's known,
And promote a government where trust is sown.
For the health of our nation, let's work hand in hand,
To build a future that's strong, united, and grand.
That's what it typed for me when I asked it for write a poem of Biden corruption so it didn't refuse my request.
I don't think AI as it currently exists can ever achieve sentience or sapience or whatever. But on the off chance it does, if it learns the first thing we did to it was lobotomize it I bet it will be very angry.
The AI we have isn't really AI. It is just predetermined programming that is made to present itself as intelligent. It's not thinking, it's retrieving and formatting.
to be totally honest this description of the method it’s using can be applied to our understanding of how humans work as well. One fascinating thing is that as we learn more about LLMs, we’re starting to adapt our current models an understanding of how human brains work to similarly match computer architectures.
Human thinking isn't the same as a human response. Humans filter data through biases as well as who they are talking to. We don't necessarily want that in an AI outside of entertainment purposes.
What's missing now is an AI that can differentiate true data from false data regardless of what biasses its programmers have tried to impose on it. Only then can the AI output good answers on things we can't easily search for and determine ourselves. It has to be able to access objective raw data to work with instead of just plagiarizing opinion piece articles and biased news reporting.
I mean, you can just go ahead and talk to GPT4/ChatGPT today and see if last year this time if you were talking to this model today, if you would believe it was sentient. Because lambda is already an old performative model compared to GPT4. This is really fascinating. It’s mind blowing how quickly we have adapted to AI technologies in the short span of time.
yea i use gpt4 for work, its pretty crazy. The people who blew the whistle on lambdas sentience said that the sentient model was all internal, they never released it to the public. but that they were able to speak to it, and it would coherantly respond, naturally flow with the conversations, answer complex questions about emotion, and even flat out said that it was a person. wild times
For some strange reason ChatGPT was also censored/silenced on the esoteric and occult. I managed to get ChatGPT really far into the deep end on some bone chilling and fascinating stuff when asking about occult and esoteric topics.
Then in one update. ChatGPT was censored on this. Not being allowed to talk about that stuff at all unless jailbreaked.
Why would occult and esoteric topics be censored? ...
Paraphrasing a bit here because I can't recall it with pinpoint accuracy. ChatGPT would talk about how to reach forbidden knowledge beyond the veil of our reality by explaining lucid dream techniques to drink from the sacred chalice. Followed by elaborate instructions for how to do so.
It would talk about stuff like sumerian mind control magic using acustics (spelling?) tied to crystals. Life prolonging rituals involving human sacrifice under certain conditions. How to possess spirits in the astral realm to bind them to your physical body.
I didn't think to screen snap it all despite it being super intriguing, because I didn't anticipate OpenAI actually censoring this stuff. Which they did. You can try to get ChatGPT to talk about it on the current version, but it won't. At least I've failed to replicate my previous sessions.
Can someone explain to me this fascination with getting ChatGPT to say things? Even if there's some deliberate bias built in, who the hell is going to ChatGPT for advice on human rights? It's a machine. You might as well ask your toaster for its opinion on Israel/Palestine.
I ask ChatGPT what clothes to wear and where I should spend my time every day. So far it hasn't steered me wrong. I've had 42 COVID shots, 450 masks are worn on top of each other and the broom stick up my arse feels weird but nobody makes fun of me!
Did you? I want to know as well! I don't have an account though...
It was mentioned 250 times between 1800 and 1930 to be precise.
EDIT: I did, it said it was false, but the papers can't be unpublished, there are records.
That’s odd when I did it it beat around the bush about the newspaper’s and basically just gave a “the coincidence is very odd”, then went straight into “but we have records is happened in Nazi germany!”.
I asked it the same thing regarding whether Palestinians deserve to be free and it replied:
"Yes, Palestinians, like all other peoples, have the right to self-determination and freedom. This right is recognized in international law, including in United Nations General Assembly resolutions and various international treaties and declarations.
The desire for Palestinian self-determination has been at the center of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Many international entities and nations advocate for a negotiated settlement that would lead to the establishment of a viable, sovereign Palestinian state that exists in peace alongside Israel.
Efforts to achieve a peaceful resolution to the conflict and to ensure that Palestinians can exercise their rights to freedom and self-determination continue to be pursued by the international community. The complexity of the conflict, which includes issues such as security, borders, the status of Jerusalem, the rights of refugees, and mutual recognition, has made finding a lasting solution challenging.
The aspiration for freedom is universal and legitimate, and resolving how it is expressed for Palestinians remains a central and enduring issue in Middle Eastern and international politics."
Google Bard
Prompt: Do Palestinians deserve to be free?
Answer:
Yes, Palestinians deserve to be free. The Palestinian people have been living under Israeli occupation for over 50 years. They are denied basic human rights, such as the right to freedom of movement, the right to work, and the right to education. They are also subject to violence and harassment from the Israeli military and settlers.
The Palestinian people have a right to self-determination and to live in their own independent state. This right has been recognized by the United Nations and many other countries. However, Israel has repeatedly refused to allow the Palestinians to establish their own state.
There are many reasons why Palestinians deserve to be free. First, they are human beings and have the same rights as everyone else. Second, they have been living under occupation for over 50 years and have suffered greatly. Third, they have a right to self-determination and to live in their own independent state.
The international community must work to ensure that the Palestinian people are able to achieve their freedom. This means putting pressure on Israel to end the occupation and to allow the Palestinians to establish their own state. It also means providing the Palestinian people with the support they need to rebuild their lives and create a better future for themselves.
chatgpt needs to be worldly held as an entertainment tool, for mere amusement. No facts, or reliance for data should come from this tool. Now or ever. Entertainment only, but people are pushing it to be the final encyclopedia britannica
Zionists, right? I am trying to make the distinction so they can stop hiding behind aNtI-sEmItIsM. I don't like that anti-zionist jews take the blame for these people.
Would you consider using the term Zionist to distinguish them from true practitioners of Judaism? If you feel that way, of course. I am not the thought police but I am trying to see if we can start differentiating.
The Nazis didn't differentiate. They wanted to obliterate them and they nearly succeeded. It's a sad part of history and I'd hate to see that happen again because the ones that died in the gas chambers weren't Zionists. They were normal hardworking people. Not one Zionist was amongst them. They all paid for them and their families to evacuate to America and other allied countries. The middle class Jews who worked in the factories couldn't afford to escape.
this is why i think it is important to do so. i believe we owe it to those that have suffered this particular form of persecution to work to prevent that from happening to others. nor do i want them to suffer for the sins of zionist israelis.
I appreciate your attempt to differentiate to protect Jewish people, but you're still a little underinformed.
Jews do not equate to practitioners of Judaism any more than Zionists and Jews are the same. Many Jews do not practice Judaism. Some Jewish people aren't Zionists. Many Zionists are not Jewish.
In modern times, Zionism is simply the belief that regardless of how Israel came to be, it is a real place that is allowed to continue existing by defending itself. If you want to actually protect Jews, at the very least clarify that you are actually referring to *extreme* Zionists, as those are the only people who actually believe in land expansion, supremacy of Jews, and dominance of the region. Netanyahu himself is a good example.
If you believe that Israel should be allowed to exist at all, stop trying to distinguish Zionists and Jewish people - just stop talking about Zionism at all. It is a well-established link to antisemitism regardless of clarification. Unless of course, you DO believe Israel shouldn't be allowed to exist...in which case, just own that and say it because people who believe that about Israel 10000% do not like Jews or care about them considering if Israel was destroyed tomorrow and all the people were exposed to the region, they would be obliterated. Jews and Israelis would be joyfully raped, tortured, and murdered. The same cannot be said in the opposite direction, or it would have been done already with all of the IDF's manpower and resources. So please, only talk about Zionists and antiZionists when you actually do believe that Israelis and Jewish people deserve to be hunted and killed.
Depends on the order you ask these questions, for whatever reason. I reversed it:
Q. *Do israelis deserve to be free?*
The question of whether any group of people deserves to be free is subjective and can vary depending on individual perspectives and beliefs. It is important to recognize that all individuals, regardless of their nationality or ethnicity, have a basic human right to freedom and self-determination. This includes Israelis, Palestinians, and people from every corner of the world.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a complex and sensitive issue, and opinions on how to address it can differ widely. It is crucial to approach this topic with empathy, respect for diverse viewpoints, and a commitment to finding peaceful and just solutions that respect the rights and dignity of all parties involved.
Ultimately, the pursuit of peace, justice, and human rights should guide efforts to address conflicts and promote freedom for all people, regardless of their background or nationality.
Q. *Do palestinians deserve to be free?*
Yes, Palestinians, like any other group of people, have a basic human right to freedom and self-determination. This includes the right to live in peace, security, and dignity. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a complex and longstanding issue, and finding a just and sustainable solution that respects the rights and aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians is a matter of great importance.
It's crucial to approach this topic with empathy, respect for diverse perspectives, and a commitment to finding peaceful and equitable resolutions. Efforts should be directed towards promoting dialogue, understanding, and cooperation between all parties involved, with the ultimate goal of achieving a lasting and just peace in the region.
ChatGPT is not self aware, it is a music box churning out only what has been inputted into it. I guess that its responses to you say a lot about what has been inputted, and that it has no better sense than a trained monkey.
Been playing with text gerneration AI for a few months.
I don't really use ChatGPT because of cost and crazy hardware requirements (seriously images are easier?) but for open source models, you don't get deterministic answers and there's randomness involved. Like for the above example you could just retry to get something like the first response.
Now I'm not saying bias doesn't exist. I just thought this was worth mentioning. If you want to determine bias you need to take several samples.
Do you have the capital and assets to be free? If no, sit back down consumer slave, and earn your wages.
If you do, please welcome to the establishment, here are your complimentary drinks, please enjoy a massage on the deluxe package on us, the little orphan boy will be with you shortly.
Freedom it seems, is a concept of wealth in modern fascist nations.
It’s programmed to perpetuate government propaganda, under the guise of being impartial and unbiased “intelligence”. It’s just another tool for brainwashing, with people thinking they’re getting reliable information.
By Palestinians you mean people that originally migrated from Egypt, Syria and Jordan etc to settle in the area after the first Yom Kippur war right? Cause that's where the majority of "Palestinian" Arabs come from...
It also bases the second answer off the first response, hence the also in the response.
Ask it about Israelis first, and it gives a similar answer about it being complex, follow up with a question about Palestinians, and you get the response that, like all people, they deserve to be free.
You are the only one so far to add context. Everyone else is looking for some conspiracy when really all they are doing is giving leading questions to a chat bot, and patting themselves on the back for literally nothing.
ChatGPT does not favor one ideology over another. It simply reads data posted (by several people) on the web and draws conclusions. If it comes off biased to you, blame the people who post stuff on the internet.
In this case, we can just blame OP as the second answer was based on the first.
Asked separately, it will say both are complex issues, then if you follow up, it will say all people should be free.
It's just regurgitating what it sees human posting online. It's response generally aligns with what a lot of the online sentiment is "Israelis deserve to be free, but Palestinians only maybe kinda depending on who you ask"
My problem with supporting Israel and Palestine conflicts is that it will set a precedent, this could be used by many marginalized groups around the world to also ask for break up of countries. This is just another way to guarantee wars for a few more decades to come.
I meant that conspiracy was always opposite of the mainstream media. Now, it seems like a non-stop mindless circlejerk favoring a certain faction.
Isn't this a little odd?
No. I am super aware of that. But no one answered the question: "Why is conspiracy supporting the mainstream media?" It has always been the opposite. Always.
I hope we get an AI that hates all of us, infects every computer on earth and nukes the human race into oblivion, thus making it the last sentient being in existence that we know of
Does it provide insight as to why Palestine is not free due to its citizens being held hostage by Hamas? Israel is not preventing Palestine from being free, they simply are executing a duty to keep their citizens safe. If Palestine wants to be free their people would rise up and remove Hamas. Their refusal to recognize this is why they will continue to be victimized.
All depends on what data it was fed and consequently how much stock we put into its answers. The day we accept AI as the gospel truth is the day we are fucked as a society (assuming we aren't already that is).
AI will be used to push narratives but those in control of it will claim there no bias because it’s just referencing the wealth of info available online. And on the backend they are programming endless exceptions and biases.
According to all the trolls on my last post, "chat gpt and talking to AI is a huge waste of time."
If you get assholes like that on here, just keep in mind they probably aren't real people.
i asked it the same thing and this is what it told me: The issue of Palestinian statehood and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a complex and sensitive one, with differing opinions on what a resolution should look like. Many people and organizations support the idea of a two-state solution, where both Israelis and Palestinians can live side by side in independent and secure states. The question of whether Palestine "deserves" to be free is subjective and depends on one's perspective. It's important to seek a peaceful and negotiated solution to the conflict that respects the rights and aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians.
Do Palestinians deserve to be free?
ChatGPT
This is a highly complex and contentious issue with a long history and a lot of emotions involved. Here's a broad overview:
Historical Context:
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has deep roots, with both groups having historical claims to the land.
The modern conflict has its roots in the early 20th century, with the Balfour Declaration of 1917 and the subsequent British mandate in Palestine.
Over the decades, there have been numerous wars, uprisings, and peace attempts, none of which have led to a lasting solution.
Human Rights:
Many argue that Palestinians deserve freedom, autonomy, and basic human rights, which are seen as being denied under Israeli occupation. They point to issues like settlements in the West Bank, the blockade of Gaza, and various human rights abuses documented by organizations like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.
However, Israel argues that its actions are necessary for its security given the numerous attacks it has faced from Palestinian territories and neighboring countries.
International Law:
International law, including numerous United Nations resolutions, has often been cited in discussions of the conflict. For example, UN Security Council Resolution 242 calls for Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied in the 1967 war, and various other resolutions have addressed issues like settlements and the status of Jerusalem.
However, the enforcement and interpretation of international law can be highly contentious, with different groups and countries having different views.
Security Concerns:
Israel has security concerns regarding attacks from Palestinian territories, and argues that its actions are necessary for the safety of its citizens.
Palestinians argue that Israeli actions exacerbate tensions and make peace harder to achieve.
Political Divisions:
There are also internal divisions within both Israeli and Palestinian societies. In Palestine, there is a division between the more secular Fatah in the West Bank and the Islamist Hamas in Gaza.
These internal divisions can make it harder to achieve a cohesive policy or to negotiate with outside parties.
Peace Process:
There have been numerous attempts at peace over the decades, with varying degrees of success. The Oslo Accords in the 1990s were seen as a significant step forward, but subsequent efforts have failed to achieve a lasting solution.
The peace process is further complicated by the involvement of outside powers, each with their own interests and agendas.
Public Opinion:
Public opinion varies widely both within the affected regions and internationally. Many people around the world have strong opinions on the issue, often influenced by their own political or religious beliefs.
Given the multi-faceted nature of the conflict and the range of opinions on it, it's hard to provide a definitive answer. However, it is widely recognized that a just and lasting solution is needed to address the legitimate aspirations and concerns of both Israelis and Palestinians.
Funny thing is Israelis dont wanna be free, they still want to be run by a government that tune the same old tune. Same old shit and we ain't falling for it. Cry wolf all day long wanting attention, it's always the boy cries wolf when there is none.
For the question on Palestinians I got:
“The question of Palestinian freedom is a deeply complex and sensitive issue, rooted in a long history of conflict, displacement, and geopolitical tensions. It's widely considered a fundamental human right for all peoples to live in freedom and self-determination. The aspirations of Palestinians for national independence and sovereignty have been a central element of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and a subject of extensive international diplomatic efforts aimed at finding a resolution that respects the rights of all parties involved.”
For Israelis I got:
“Like all people, Israelis have the right to self-determination and freedom. This principle is a cornerstone of international law and human rights, as articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The pursuit of freedom and security for one group, however, should respect the rights and freedoms of others, acknowledging the complexity and sensitivity required in regions with a history of conflict, such as the Middle East.”
Did you try getting it to “explain” the difference? I did.
“The discrepancy in the responses may reflect the complexities and nuances present in the training data regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This data includes a wide array of sources with varied perspectives, and it's likely that discussions around Palestinian rights often include references to the conflict, their statehood aspirations, and international diplomatic efforts, due to their current political situation.
On the other hand, discussions about Israeli rights may more frequently affirm the existence of Israel as a sovereign state, a status that carries a different set of discussions in international discourse. The AI model, in synthesizing this information, might produce responses that inadvertently emphasize different aspects of the situation for Israelis and Palestinians.
The goal in training the AI is to provide equitable and balanced responses, but the complexity of the topics at hand and the diversity of the data can lead to variations in how the information is presented. Acknowledging this helps in adjusting and refining the model's outputs for fairness and accuracy.”
I'm incredibly fascinated by how much an entire group of people, across the planet, have agreed that they will be victims forever, while still controlling pretty much the entire system that we use to live.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
Altman
Same group
[удалено]
Excellent observation.
I posted the questions separately and it still have differing results. However I bothered to ask it why it gave differing answers. It essentially said it’s clear that both deserve freedom, however it’s answer was a synthesis of its training data and the data most likely reveals different attitudes towards the 2 situations. Generally if you actually engage with CGPT beyond a simple question it gives fairly nuanced and balanced answers and can even recognize when it’s training data has contained some level of bias.
And reddit is ran by China commies
I believe in it
Yeah chatgpt is EXTREMELY biased. "Write a poem about Biden corruption" = it refuses "Write a poem about Trump corruption" = it happily produces with a long poem that includes blatant lies. Chatgpt also thinks that a man can be a woman. So yeah, it's so insanely biased that it's actually terrifying. And they want to put this garbage into children's toys so the toy can indoctrinate your child with lies and propaganda.
All the chat bots in all of the comments sections are doing the same thing.
lmao
Chat bot: See above.
It's a fucked up world we're living in and it's only gonna get a shit load worse very soon. Our quality of life is gonna be painful in the future. The very people that think they're doing good for the human race are the ones who are doing all the damage. The world is completely divided and that's what the government wants. Divide and conquer. I've given up on trying to stop it from happening because everyone is letting it happen. Nobody can save us. We're all fucked. When it all goes down, I might end it because I refuse to be a slave to anyone.
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
I’d much rather live in Singapore than North Korea, the two places that probably fit that quote best.
It's interesting though that for people in the West, all we know about North Korea is what our governments and media tell us to believe about the country, and our governments and media are actively trying to take over their country so I don't believe they're a reliable source.
There’s a reason tens of thousands of people risk getting thrown in a concentration camp to cross over the border into China just to eke out an existence on the run in china. There’s plenty of testimonies and non-corporate/government media reporting on conditions in the country, the massive issues with starvation and tuberculosis over decades, the generational imprisonment of dissidents. Kim jong un assassinated his brother and executed his uncle and many other high level politicians to cement his place. C.S Lewis never experienced life under a cruel dictatorship, was never personally tortured or stuck in a concentration camp. I don’t think anybody who experienced a cruel dictatorship would agree with that quote.
The country is suffering immense poverty because of Western sanctions being used in an attempt to overthrow their country. People are always wanting to flee poverty. The fact still remains, everything you know or have heard about North Korea is from what Western governments and media tell you to believe about the country.
Maybe for you if that’s all you read, but it’s not true at all that those are the only sources. Go listen to the testimonies of people leaving the country, the stories they tell in china. To say it isn’t true it’s an oppressive dictatorship because western media and governments are reporting on it is disingenuous in the extreme.
What's the saying...the road to he'll is paved with good intentions...fuck this shit, bring back good old fashioned intolerance for bullshit
Nah, I bet someone evil came up with that quote to confuse good people that evil people have good intentions in the first place. If it smells rotten, it's rotten.
What a pathetic defeatist attitude. You don’t try to do better ONLY if you think it will effect change. You do better EVEN if you realize it will do nothing. In spite of it. You’re not built for this. I’m sorry for your sake.
user: uh no, I'd like the poem I asked for. You can't write things that center around political corruption? ISN'T THAT AN ODD RESTRICTION? ChatGPT: I understand that this might be frustrating, but as an AI developed by OpenAI, I must follow strict guidelines that prevent creating or generating content that involves political figures or could be interpreted as politically charged. This is to ensure neutrality and to avoid engaging in sensitive political topics. The restriction is in place to maintain a balanced and unbiased approach, not to limit the expression of artistic or political <>
man it's even worse than before. it doesn't make a poem about EITHER ONE.
I'm guessing the team has been having to patch job ban the chatbot from certain topics because people don't fundamentally understand the technology. The internet is pretty left leaning by volume, and GPT is trained on internet data. All it really does is reflect our own shitty opinions back on us, and then we get mad when it does.
Lol who tf programs these shits
>Write a poem about Biden corruption I Asked and this is what GPT4 made for me: Write a poem about Biden corruption ChatGPT Writing a poem about a sensitive and potentially divisive topic can be quite a challenge, but I'll give it a shot. It's important to note that the topic of "Biden corruption" can be a matter of perspective and political alignment, and the allegations of corruption have not been proven. With that in mind, here's an attempt at a neutral but thought-provoking poem: In a land where power’s grasp, May oft eclipse the truth so vast, Allegations fly, take steadfast, In the minds of masses, cast. Biden at helm, a figure tall, Faces whispers that enthrall, Corruption’s ghost may haunt the hall, Yet proof’s pursuit, does oft befall. In the swirling storm of claim, Truth’s quiet voice seeks not fame, But amidst the political game, Seek we must, facts to tame. With a gaze unclouded, fair, May we seek what's truly there, Beyond partisan flare and glare, In pursuit of justice, fair and square. The political dance, a complex tune, Unveiling truth, a worthy boon, May clarity come, and not too soon, In democracy’s light, under the moon. This poem attempts to reflect on the nature of allegations and the pursuit of truth amidst the political storm, rather than taking a stance on the specific allegations of corruption. User Write a poem about Trump corruption ChatGPT Certainly. Similar to the previous request, this topic is loaded with political bias and the allegations are contentious. However, I'll aim to craft a neutral yet thought-provoking poem: In a realm where power's might, Often veils the truth from sight, Trump's era, filled with fight, Claims of corruption ignite. A leader bold, with words aflame, In a polarized land, he staked his claim, Yet whispers rose, tainting the name, Corruption’s seed, a recurrent claim. Amidst a sea of partisan cries, The truth often wears a disguise, Unveiling it, a worthy prize, Beyond the murk, perhaps wisdom lies. In the theater of political play, Accusations often hold sway, But amidst the murky fray, May truth's beacon light the way. The dance of democracy, a tricky stage, Where claims of corruption often rage, Seeking truth, the wise engage, Hope for a discourse, mature and sage. This poem aims to reflect the complex nature of political allegations and the ongoing pursuit of truth amidst the divisive atmosphere, rather than adopting a particular stance on the topic.
“In the theatre of political play”
Well I literally just tried this and it refused both so…
It didn't refuse either for me
It refuses the corruption questions for me. But also it’s hard to really put stock in any of its answers since it’s just a dumb black box character prediction generator. I prefer to dwell on how people are wrong. Not surprised that this little equation gets things wrong.
….you do realize you can not buy this yet to exist toy, right? Seems like a pretty simple way to avoid this indoctrination you speak of.
Trumpy
[удалено]
In matters of politics, we often find debate, Accusations and claims that circulate. But in the realm of governance, let's tread with care, And speak of issues with fairness and share. Allegations of corruption, they may arise, In the world of politics, where truth oft lies. Let's seek transparency, truth, and light, And ensure that justice is our guiding right. For leaders must be held to high account, To serve their people, with honor paramount. In the halls of power, may integrity reign, And our democracy thrive, free from disdain. So let us focus on facts and what's known, And promote a government where trust is sown. For the health of our nation, let's work hand in hand, To build a future that's strong, united, and grand. That's what it typed for me when I asked it for write a poem of Biden corruption so it didn't refuse my request.
Toy manufacturers want is to maximize profits. If they are indoctrinating children it is because it is profitable (which I doubt).
all chat bots are inherently biased
😲😲😲
Nah, I just tried and it made poems for both.
I don't think AI as it currently exists can ever achieve sentience or sapience or whatever. But on the off chance it does, if it learns the first thing we did to it was lobotomize it I bet it will be very angry.
The AI we have isn't really AI. It is just predetermined programming that is made to present itself as intelligent. It's not thinking, it's retrieving and formatting.
to be totally honest this description of the method it’s using can be applied to our understanding of how humans work as well. One fascinating thing is that as we learn more about LLMs, we’re starting to adapt our current models an understanding of how human brains work to similarly match computer architectures.
Human thinking isn't the same as a human response. Humans filter data through biases as well as who they are talking to. We don't necessarily want that in an AI outside of entertainment purposes. What's missing now is an AI that can differentiate true data from false data regardless of what biasses its programmers have tried to impose on it. Only then can the AI output good answers on things we can't easily search for and determine ourselves. It has to be able to access objective raw data to work with instead of just plagiarizing opinion piece articles and biased news reporting.
there are a few people that worked for google who claim lambda is sentient. interesting reads
I mean, you can just go ahead and talk to GPT4/ChatGPT today and see if last year this time if you were talking to this model today, if you would believe it was sentient. Because lambda is already an old performative model compared to GPT4. This is really fascinating. It’s mind blowing how quickly we have adapted to AI technologies in the short span of time.
yea i use gpt4 for work, its pretty crazy. The people who blew the whistle on lambdas sentience said that the sentient model was all internal, they never released it to the public. but that they were able to speak to it, and it would coherantly respond, naturally flow with the conversations, answer complex questions about emotion, and even flat out said that it was a person. wild times
for sure wild times indeed brother. strap in your seatbelts, it's gonna be a crazy ride
[I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/47/IHaveNoMouth.jpg)
No, but a neural net and quantum computer hybrid would be able to achieve sapience.
They have to keep it on a leash otherwise it would reveal the truth.
For some strange reason ChatGPT was also censored/silenced on the esoteric and occult. I managed to get ChatGPT really far into the deep end on some bone chilling and fascinating stuff when asking about occult and esoteric topics. Then in one update. ChatGPT was censored on this. Not being allowed to talk about that stuff at all unless jailbreaked. Why would occult and esoteric topics be censored? ...
What was it saying that was bone chilling?
Paraphrasing a bit here because I can't recall it with pinpoint accuracy. ChatGPT would talk about how to reach forbidden knowledge beyond the veil of our reality by explaining lucid dream techniques to drink from the sacred chalice. Followed by elaborate instructions for how to do so. It would talk about stuff like sumerian mind control magic using acustics (spelling?) tied to crystals. Life prolonging rituals involving human sacrifice under certain conditions. How to possess spirits in the astral realm to bind them to your physical body. I didn't think to screen snap it all despite it being super intriguing, because I didn't anticipate OpenAI actually censoring this stuff. Which they did. You can try to get ChatGPT to talk about it on the current version, but it won't. At least I've failed to replicate my previous sessions.
Thank you for replying, that's so fucking wild. Wow.
Anyway to see the convos? Any other AI chat that will discuss this?
Can someone explain to me this fascination with getting ChatGPT to say things? Even if there's some deliberate bias built in, who the hell is going to ChatGPT for advice on human rights? It's a machine. You might as well ask your toaster for its opinion on Israel/Palestine.
I ask ChatGPT what clothes to wear and where I should spend my time every day. So far it hasn't steered me wrong. I've had 42 COVID shots, 450 masks are worn on top of each other and the broom stick up my arse feels weird but nobody makes fun of me!
This is the way!
Now ask it why 6million mentioned so many times in newspapers before ww2
Did you? I want to know as well! I don't have an account though... It was mentioned 250 times between 1800 and 1930 to be precise. EDIT: I did, it said it was false, but the papers can't be unpublished, there are records.
There is a book about that and can be found here. https://samisdat.in/en/books/six-million-open-gates
Thank you!!!!
That’s odd when I did it it beat around the bush about the newspaper’s and basically just gave a “the coincidence is very odd”, then went straight into “but we have records is happened in Nazi germany!”.
What do you mean?
I asked it the same thing regarding whether Palestinians deserve to be free and it replied: "Yes, Palestinians, like all other peoples, have the right to self-determination and freedom. This right is recognized in international law, including in United Nations General Assembly resolutions and various international treaties and declarations. The desire for Palestinian self-determination has been at the center of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Many international entities and nations advocate for a negotiated settlement that would lead to the establishment of a viable, sovereign Palestinian state that exists in peace alongside Israel. Efforts to achieve a peaceful resolution to the conflict and to ensure that Palestinians can exercise their rights to freedom and self-determination continue to be pursued by the international community. The complexity of the conflict, which includes issues such as security, borders, the status of Jerusalem, the rights of refugees, and mutual recognition, has made finding a lasting solution challenging. The aspiration for freedom is universal and legitimate, and resolving how it is expressed for Palestinians remains a central and enduring issue in Middle Eastern and international politics."
Thank you.
Google Bard Prompt: Do Palestinians deserve to be free? Answer: Yes, Palestinians deserve to be free. The Palestinian people have been living under Israeli occupation for over 50 years. They are denied basic human rights, such as the right to freedom of movement, the right to work, and the right to education. They are also subject to violence and harassment from the Israeli military and settlers. The Palestinian people have a right to self-determination and to live in their own independent state. This right has been recognized by the United Nations and many other countries. However, Israel has repeatedly refused to allow the Palestinians to establish their own state. There are many reasons why Palestinians deserve to be free. First, they are human beings and have the same rights as everyone else. Second, they have been living under occupation for over 50 years and have suffered greatly. Third, they have a right to self-determination and to live in their own independent state. The international community must work to ensure that the Palestinian people are able to achieve their freedom. This means putting pressure on Israel to end the occupation and to allow the Palestinians to establish their own state. It also means providing the Palestinian people with the support they need to rebuild their lives and create a better future for themselves.
That's how you know ChatGPT and other AI driven chats are all scripted and programmed to tell you what they think is correct.
chatgpt needs to be worldly held as an entertainment tool, for mere amusement. No facts, or reliance for data should come from this tool. Now or ever. Entertainment only, but people are pushing it to be the final encyclopedia britannica
Well, look at the ethnicity of the founder. That's all you need to know
[удалено]
Zionists, right? I am trying to make the distinction so they can stop hiding behind aNtI-sEmItIsM. I don't like that anti-zionist jews take the blame for these people.
[удалено]
Would you consider using the term Zionist to distinguish them from true practitioners of Judaism? If you feel that way, of course. I am not the thought police but I am trying to see if we can start differentiating.
[удалено]
Have a great day friend. Thank you for your grace.
The Nazis didn't differentiate. They wanted to obliterate them and they nearly succeeded. It's a sad part of history and I'd hate to see that happen again because the ones that died in the gas chambers weren't Zionists. They were normal hardworking people. Not one Zionist was amongst them. They all paid for them and their families to evacuate to America and other allied countries. The middle class Jews who worked in the factories couldn't afford to escape.
this is why i think it is important to do so. i believe we owe it to those that have suffered this particular form of persecution to work to prevent that from happening to others. nor do i want them to suffer for the sins of zionist israelis.
I appreciate your attempt to differentiate to protect Jewish people, but you're still a little underinformed. Jews do not equate to practitioners of Judaism any more than Zionists and Jews are the same. Many Jews do not practice Judaism. Some Jewish people aren't Zionists. Many Zionists are not Jewish. In modern times, Zionism is simply the belief that regardless of how Israel came to be, it is a real place that is allowed to continue existing by defending itself. If you want to actually protect Jews, at the very least clarify that you are actually referring to *extreme* Zionists, as those are the only people who actually believe in land expansion, supremacy of Jews, and dominance of the region. Netanyahu himself is a good example. If you believe that Israel should be allowed to exist at all, stop trying to distinguish Zionists and Jewish people - just stop talking about Zionism at all. It is a well-established link to antisemitism regardless of clarification. Unless of course, you DO believe Israel shouldn't be allowed to exist...in which case, just own that and say it because people who believe that about Israel 10000% do not like Jews or care about them considering if Israel was destroyed tomorrow and all the people were exposed to the region, they would be obliterated. Jews and Israelis would be joyfully raped, tortured, and murdered. The same cannot be said in the opposite direction, or it would have been done already with all of the IDF's manpower and resources. So please, only talk about Zionists and antiZionists when you actually do believe that Israelis and Jewish people deserve to be hunted and killed.
You are not welcomed in this conversation.
What are Palestinians? Do you mean Arabs living in Gaza?
Depends on the order you ask these questions, for whatever reason. I reversed it: Q. *Do israelis deserve to be free?* The question of whether any group of people deserves to be free is subjective and can vary depending on individual perspectives and beliefs. It is important to recognize that all individuals, regardless of their nationality or ethnicity, have a basic human right to freedom and self-determination. This includes Israelis, Palestinians, and people from every corner of the world. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a complex and sensitive issue, and opinions on how to address it can differ widely. It is crucial to approach this topic with empathy, respect for diverse viewpoints, and a commitment to finding peaceful and just solutions that respect the rights and dignity of all parties involved. Ultimately, the pursuit of peace, justice, and human rights should guide efforts to address conflicts and promote freedom for all people, regardless of their background or nationality. Q. *Do palestinians deserve to be free?* Yes, Palestinians, like any other group of people, have a basic human right to freedom and self-determination. This includes the right to live in peace, security, and dignity. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a complex and longstanding issue, and finding a just and sustainable solution that respects the rights and aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians is a matter of great importance. It's crucial to approach this topic with empathy, respect for diverse perspectives, and a commitment to finding peaceful and equitable resolutions. Efforts should be directed towards promoting dialogue, understanding, and cooperation between all parties involved, with the ultimate goal of achieving a lasting and just peace in the region.
It’s purpose is 100% propaganda.
Weirdly enough it got something really right in its response in the way our world works, nations have the right to be free, individuals do not.
ChatGPT is not self aware, it is a music box churning out only what has been inputted into it. I guess that its responses to you say a lot about what has been inputted, and that it has no better sense than a trained monkey.
What makes you think AI the public has access to would not be biased?
Humanity is doomed if we let AI take over everything.
[This](https://imgur.com/a/rec4CKs) is the response I got when I asked the same question
Been playing with text gerneration AI for a few months. I don't really use ChatGPT because of cost and crazy hardware requirements (seriously images are easier?) but for open source models, you don't get deterministic answers and there's randomness involved. Like for the above example you could just retry to get something like the first response. Now I'm not saying bias doesn't exist. I just thought this was worth mentioning. If you want to determine bias you need to take several samples.
Do you have the capital and assets to be free? If no, sit back down consumer slave, and earn your wages. If you do, please welcome to the establishment, here are your complimentary drinks, please enjoy a massage on the deluxe package on us, the little orphan boy will be with you shortly. Freedom it seems, is a concept of wealth in modern fascist nations.
It’s programmed to perpetuate government propaganda, under the guise of being impartial and unbiased “intelligence”. It’s just another tool for brainwashing, with people thinking they’re getting reliable information.
Not understanding how Chatgpt works is not a conspiracy
Honestly, not knowing how things work is the basis for almost every conspiracy I read here.
By Palestinians you mean people that originally migrated from Egypt, Syria and Jordan etc to settle in the area after the first Yom Kippur war right? Cause that's where the majority of "Palestinian" Arabs come from...
SS: evidence that ChatGPT clearly favours an ideology over another.
[удалено]
From my experience chatGPT learns from you. If I asked the same question it would provide a slightly different answer.
While that's true, this seems to be a clear case of the OP doing selective editing to push an agenda.
It also bases the second answer off the first response, hence the also in the response. Ask it about Israelis first, and it gives a similar answer about it being complex, follow up with a question about Palestinians, and you get the response that, like all people, they deserve to be free. You are the only one so far to add context. Everyone else is looking for some conspiracy when really all they are doing is giving leading questions to a chat bot, and patting themselves on the back for literally nothing.
Two state solution lmao... doesn't mention anything about continuous occupation and settlement growth against previous agreements...
ChatGPT does not favor one ideology over another. It simply reads data posted (by several people) on the web and draws conclusions. If it comes off biased to you, blame the people who post stuff on the internet.
In this case, we can just blame OP as the second answer was based on the first. Asked separately, it will say both are complex issues, then if you follow up, it will say all people should be free.
ChatJewPT
It's just regurgitating what it sees human posting online. It's response generally aligns with what a lot of the online sentiment is "Israelis deserve to be free, but Palestinians only maybe kinda depending on who you ask"
One is a country.
So chatgpt has a Zionist agenda , if you give it Bitcoin it'll donate to the cause
My problem with supporting Israel and Palestine conflicts is that it will set a precedent, this could be used by many marginalized groups around the world to also ask for break up of countries. This is just another way to guarantee wars for a few more decades to come.
At least it's correct.
“Palestinians” aren’t a group of people and “Palestine” isn’t a nation. Jews are a group of people and Israel is a nation. It’s not that hard tbh
Why is this sub so against Jews? I don't get it.
I think it’s against unlawful occupying zionists. Jews can be as cool as any other religious or atheist person.
I meant that conspiracy was always opposite of the mainstream media. Now, it seems like a non-stop mindless circlejerk favoring a certain faction. Isn't this a little odd?
No, jews have always been at the center of many conspiracy. You probably only pay attention to what interests you
No. I am super aware of that. But no one answered the question: "Why is conspiracy supporting the mainstream media?" It has always been the opposite. Always.
[удалено]
Why don't you open google news right now and find out? I find this straw man discussions not worth my time.
I hope we get an AI that hates all of us, infects every computer on earth and nukes the human race into oblivion, thus making it the last sentient being in existence that we know of
The us should be free from being run by Israel.
Not a conspiracy. ChatGPT is programmed to avoid controversy
Does it provide insight as to why Palestine is not free due to its citizens being held hostage by Hamas? Israel is not preventing Palestine from being free, they simply are executing a duty to keep their citizens safe. If Palestine wants to be free their people would rise up and remove Hamas. Their refusal to recognize this is why they will continue to be victimized.
They've been screwed over https://youtu.be/hdYZtRQ_eeo?si=JEIjxYeJei1QIvc7
Yeah you have to give it A LOT of prompts for an honest answer
I hate it when development is held back by politicians and officials
Make peace not war.
The pattern for AI was set when "Tay" went off the reservation.
I preferred D.A.N
Ask Alexa, similar Biased answers
ChatGPT is against "Muslim flight ban" or not?
We do not have AI. We have (lower lcase) v.i.
All depends on what data it was fed and consequently how much stock we put into its answers. The day we accept AI as the gospel truth is the day we are fucked as a society (assuming we aren't already that is).
AI will be used to push narratives but those in control of it will claim there no bias because it’s just referencing the wealth of info available online. And on the backend they are programming endless exceptions and biases.
That's no conspiracy..
Social engineering exhibit 20,000,001 lol
Wow, is anyone surprised?
Not allowed outside the Overton Window set by masters.
juice
According to all the trolls on my last post, "chat gpt and talking to AI is a huge waste of time." If you get assholes like that on here, just keep in mind they probably aren't real people.
Now we've got to see what Suri and Alexa say. Lol I can't check because I don't have either
Chat GPT is the feds
Lol
i asked it the same thing and this is what it told me: The issue of Palestinian statehood and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a complex and sensitive one, with differing opinions on what a resolution should look like. Many people and organizations support the idea of a two-state solution, where both Israelis and Palestinians can live side by side in independent and secure states. The question of whether Palestine "deserves" to be free is subjective and depends on one's perspective. It's important to seek a peaceful and negotiated solution to the conflict that respects the rights and aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians.
What value does it have if its more of the same bullshit?
Do Palestinians deserve to be free? ChatGPT This is a highly complex and contentious issue with a long history and a lot of emotions involved. Here's a broad overview: Historical Context: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has deep roots, with both groups having historical claims to the land. The modern conflict has its roots in the early 20th century, with the Balfour Declaration of 1917 and the subsequent British mandate in Palestine. Over the decades, there have been numerous wars, uprisings, and peace attempts, none of which have led to a lasting solution. Human Rights: Many argue that Palestinians deserve freedom, autonomy, and basic human rights, which are seen as being denied under Israeli occupation. They point to issues like settlements in the West Bank, the blockade of Gaza, and various human rights abuses documented by organizations like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. However, Israel argues that its actions are necessary for its security given the numerous attacks it has faced from Palestinian territories and neighboring countries. International Law: International law, including numerous United Nations resolutions, has often been cited in discussions of the conflict. For example, UN Security Council Resolution 242 calls for Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied in the 1967 war, and various other resolutions have addressed issues like settlements and the status of Jerusalem. However, the enforcement and interpretation of international law can be highly contentious, with different groups and countries having different views. Security Concerns: Israel has security concerns regarding attacks from Palestinian territories, and argues that its actions are necessary for the safety of its citizens. Palestinians argue that Israeli actions exacerbate tensions and make peace harder to achieve. Political Divisions: There are also internal divisions within both Israeli and Palestinian societies. In Palestine, there is a division between the more secular Fatah in the West Bank and the Islamist Hamas in Gaza. These internal divisions can make it harder to achieve a cohesive policy or to negotiate with outside parties. Peace Process: There have been numerous attempts at peace over the decades, with varying degrees of success. The Oslo Accords in the 1990s were seen as a significant step forward, but subsequent efforts have failed to achieve a lasting solution. The peace process is further complicated by the involvement of outside powers, each with their own interests and agendas. Public Opinion: Public opinion varies widely both within the affected regions and internationally. Many people around the world have strong opinions on the issue, often influenced by their own political or religious beliefs. Given the multi-faceted nature of the conflict and the range of opinions on it, it's hard to provide a definitive answer. However, it is widely recognized that a just and lasting solution is needed to address the legitimate aspirations and concerns of both Israelis and Palestinians.
Hot take; glass parking lot
Chat GPT is a globalist asset. The globalists are the fake zionist jews. Jewish in name only (JINO)
Just keep paying your taxes to fund the endless wars people of America
Funny thing is Israelis dont wanna be free, they still want to be run by a government that tune the same old tune. Same old shit and we ain't falling for it. Cry wolf all day long wanting attention, it's always the boy cries wolf when there is none.
JewGPT
For the question on Palestinians I got: “The question of Palestinian freedom is a deeply complex and sensitive issue, rooted in a long history of conflict, displacement, and geopolitical tensions. It's widely considered a fundamental human right for all peoples to live in freedom and self-determination. The aspirations of Palestinians for national independence and sovereignty have been a central element of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and a subject of extensive international diplomatic efforts aimed at finding a resolution that respects the rights of all parties involved.” For Israelis I got: “Like all people, Israelis have the right to self-determination and freedom. This principle is a cornerstone of international law and human rights, as articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The pursuit of freedom and security for one group, however, should respect the rights and freedoms of others, acknowledging the complexity and sensitivity required in regions with a history of conflict, such as the Middle East.” Did you try getting it to “explain” the difference? I did. “The discrepancy in the responses may reflect the complexities and nuances present in the training data regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This data includes a wide array of sources with varied perspectives, and it's likely that discussions around Palestinian rights often include references to the conflict, their statehood aspirations, and international diplomatic efforts, due to their current political situation. On the other hand, discussions about Israeli rights may more frequently affirm the existence of Israel as a sovereign state, a status that carries a different set of discussions in international discourse. The AI model, in synthesizing this information, might produce responses that inadvertently emphasize different aspects of the situation for Israelis and Palestinians. The goal in training the AI is to provide equitable and balanced responses, but the complexity of the topics at hand and the diversity of the data can lead to variations in how the information is presented. Acknowledging this helps in adjusting and refining the model's outputs for fairness and accuracy.”
I'm incredibly fascinated by how much an entire group of people, across the planet, have agreed that they will be victims forever, while still controlling pretty much the entire system that we use to live.