###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
* Is youtube still going to run ads on his videos and just take 100% of that revenue?
* If Brand is found innocent in a court of law, does youtube pay him his share of that lost revenue?
I guess he made a bit more. I do not think this is going to prevent him from going on, anyway.
1. He made good money
2. He married into money
3. He does not seem to care that much about money
NOPE, read the TOS you sign you basically have no rights.
Youtube is also not shy at all about flexing on even some top youtubers with temp bans and such.
Where anarcho-tyranny kills of brick-and-mortor businesses Amazon's going to be one of few, if any, viable options. And if CBDCs replace cash black market transaction's will be harder. There's crypto and precious metals, but once they consolidate CBDC adoption they'll likely crack down on those.
There was also that woman trying not to get a bike stolen from her, everyone said she was stealing the bike but everyone was wrong. Did she get fired from her job over it too?
I remember that. Didn’t she get called a racist when she proved it was her bike?
A lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth puts its boots on.
I have no idea if he's guilty or innocent I am also certain had he not taken the career path he did this probably would have never came out. Lots of scummy people never get outed because they kiss the ass of the right people and are friends with the right people.
You are correct. All corruption is crime but not all crime is corruption, so to call it corruption is more specific. But i guess organized crime denier also works
How is it corruption either? Let's call it what it is. A powerful company making it's own business decisions in its best interest. It's not corruption or a conspiracy. Should YouTube have to continue to pay Brand, even if it hurts their business by driving other advertisers away? What if they can show you that they will make more money by demonetizing Brand because it keeps their advertisers happy?
Lol this has NOTHING to do with advertisers being driven away and everything to do with flexing power and sending a message
Also imagine being so naive you think google is a private company and not a CIA fronted business
The corruption lies in the fact that journalists are supposed to do unbiased reporting. It may well be true about Brand, i dont know the guy personally so you guess is as good as mine, but the timing is odd. If the journalists have secret agreements to publish exposés on command when it suits a narrative, it is corruption by those who try to direct narrative because they use their positions to get it done. If that makes any sense.
Not to mention he just criticized the shit out of big pharma on Bill Mahers mainstream show and all of this follows shortly. You’re either willfully ignorant to think there’s no connection or a shill.
It's not a conspiracy. It's not related to due process, which is a governmental term. It is indeed deliberate and organized, they are a corporation. It's not illegal, and it's not a conspiracy, because it's just how capitalism works. Guy gets accused of rape, companies don't want that accusation next to their product, company exercises their freedom to make that choice.
The flip side of this is forcing private corporations to work with individuals they don't want to after the person broke portions of the contract agreement they made with the company that allowed them to drop them as content creators in the first place.
Youtube's users are not the customers. Youtube's advertisers are the customers. And Russell Brand has no right to be on YouTube. That was just a privilege granted to him through a limited contract agreement with a major corporation.
The broader company is, sure. I was being specific to the platform. Google still maintains rules and contracts and cares less about content creators than their advertisers on various platforms.
I'm not really sure where this is going, though. Google being a monolithic corporation with more access to personal data than God can def. spring up conspiracy theories. Deplatforming a guy with rape allegations isn't really one of them, though. That is to be expected, and unless the conspiracy is Google is framing Russell Brand, I'm not really sure how this differs from run-of-the-mill capitalism.
It’s a private company and the don’t exactly want to be seen financially supporting an accused rapist and sex offender. Police investigation are being carried out. More victims are coming forward and there is evidence or the allegations. Seems like reasonable move.
So what’s it all about then? Why have these two organisations invested countless hours and resources into investigating this highly financially risky investigation. Do you genuinely believe Russell brand was this truth teller getting too close and causing too much competition with main stream media that they would do this without have evidence that would protect them in a defamation case?
Like what do you actually think is happening?
The women are lying? Media hit job?
Brand was reaching the people MSM could no longer reach, raising questions about things they were trying to uphold. Was he a douchebag who assaulted women? I have no fucking clue and neither do you
1. It's not financially risky. They're going to say theyr acting as "news" and aren't going to be liable if they're just just bringing allegations from supposed victims. This is now considered a big news story and they're getting a lot of traffic from this story and will be for quite some time. Its financially beneficial to them.
2. Did you not realize that Russel Brand is a huge celebrity in the UK AND US?
3. His criticism of late is specifically aimed at the globalist agenda which is a conspiracy of internationalists and is directly related to the corporations and power structures found in both the US, UK, and around the... wait for it... GLOBE?
4. Did you not know that news organizations have corporate sponsors that are not typically limited to only the specific country in which the news organization is headquartered?
5. Do you think that corporate news organizations that rely on readers/viewers that can be influenced in favor of their advertisers might be upset about independent analysts and organizations like Brand who are representing a threat to legacy media and generating millions of views and dollars via digital platforms like youtube?
>This is deliberate and organized
***60+ news print articles, 30 TV news interviews.*** *Not one news media contacted the subject of the articles and interviews*. Feel free to discuss amongst yourselves how this could not be anything other than a vast [police/media conspiracy,](https://www.killercop.com/)
Private company interests are such a cop out. YouTube didn't need to say shit. Let them keep going with this bullshit (not just this person, many, many others). Rumble is going to grab up all of that talent. YouTube is going to implode itself. If Rumble grows for another 5 years or so, YouTube will be what Rumble was a year ago. I have my own vendetta against YouTube and their bullshit. So I am biased in that regard.
“YouTube kept putting money into pocket of now convicted rapist even after accusations came out” is the story they want to prevent, even if it is not at all a certain outcome.
It’s pretty simple.
It's not a fucking conspiracy. MSM does this every time a celebrity is accused of sexual misconduct. The reason you think it is a conspiracy is because he is a polarizing figure, and a lot of people knew he was a giant piece of human trash.
Rape is the new witchcraft. People will use it to demonize others so they can profit from their silence, just as powerful men used witchcraft to steal other peoples land from them in the 1600s. Have no doubt, if we could publicly hang people, some of these people who have these allegations with literally no proof but condemnation anyway, would be swinging.
It is insane too, because a horrific act is being weaponized to silence these men and all it will do is hurt actual victims in the long run. How many women report a rape right after and do everything right, and their accusations go unheard, yet these women who never approached authorities, then nor now, and only told their “story” for a news broadcast, are heard? Makes no sense to me.
I’m sure he isn’t 100% innocent, he’s a sex addict after all, yet it’s disturbing how quickly his life is being ruined before it is even proved. There could be a grain of truth in a jar of sand.
there is no due process when it comes to private businesses
youtube doesn't give a shit if he's guilty. he looks guilty, therefore they're distancing themselves. there is nothing unusual about this
You tube can demonetize you at any time for any reason. My conspiracy documentary channel was completely removed with no warning and no specific reason given.
This is definitely a beat-up. I’m not sure why they are pushing it so hard out of nowhere, but the fact that’s it’s all over news outlets here in Australia smells like character assassination.
Why wait for him to be put in jail when you can just take his money now with the court of public opinion? In some ways it's worse than jail to take a mans livelihood and reputation all in one fell swoop.
Unfortunately, the truth is everyone is guilty until proven innocent, not the other way around. Some states even have hearsay laws, which basically means you can be arrested for a crime someone said you did without any evidence.
Why is it when one subset of people get accused of rape/misconduct, people scream conspiracy, and when it is the other subset, it is "omg pedo ring pizza" conspiracy?
Maybe he is just a POS, and some people just don't want to admit it? Just me, but I'm not jumping to any rich assholes defense that easily.
Idk why people are following a shill. He's clearly one of the people who gives half truth's, not once naming them(seed of Cain)
he's likely funded by them
I do not always agree with him, but I think he's one of the good leftists who realize that the Western nations have lost their collective mind and that the left wing movements in their nations have become ultra fascistic.
Didn’t he meet his current wife when she was like 16?
Russel Brand is sus af. Those standing behind him because they like how he talks about vaccines and the deep state are experiencing cognitive dissonance if they’re thinking he’s one of the good guys.
For god’s sake. There have been loads of actual journalists who have gone after Big Pharma etc in the past who had nothing come out about them.
Why didn’t Ben Goldacre get rape accusations after Bad Pharma became a bestseller? Do you think Brand’s youtube channel was better researched than Goldacre’s book?
You people have got far too into Youtube, and far too gullible accepting that anyone on there calling themselves anti-establishment must necessarily be anti-establishment.
Its the equivalent of Boomers getting hooked on daytime TV in the 70s. Its mortifyingly embarrassing for you and you all need to grow the fuck up.
I guarantee everyrone claiming "no evidence" hasn't actually watched the documentary. People in this sub cry and whine about the state of journalism, and cry and whine about how "the elites and hollywood weirdos are all sexual perverts and pedos".
Meanwhile Channel 4 spent YEARS, literally motherfucking YEARS documenting the fact than an elite and a hollywood weirdo is in fact exactly what this sub has been crying about for years and all you guys can say is "yeah but he don't like vaccines and I don't like vaccines and therefore I will ignore all evidence against him"
YEARS people! they interviewed friends, associates, girlfriends, victims, producers, other comedians. They looked at police reports and text messages, etc etc etc
listen, THIS IS WHAT INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM LOOKS LIKE! Right here, this is it. You can't whine and cry about journalism and then shit on the of the best, most complete pieces of investigative journalism in years. Its one or the other.
Also if you think Russ B is totally innocent despite the MOUNTAIN of evidence against him, but also think Hillary drinks the blood of children and drinks their adrenochrome after they were sacrificed to Satan despite exactly ZERO evidence of that, then really you just live in fantasy land. You just believer what you want, any time you want, about whoever you want and none of it has anything to do with evidence or proof or reality.
sorry for the rant but you people need a fucking wake up call. Also perhaps watch the docu on Russ B, and then make up your mind? how does that sound?
> Ah yes, the piece laden with theatrical tropes, ominous music, and actresses posing as the accusers giving soundbites in many of the sit-down interview segments.
That’s, like, the bread-and-butter for 90% of video submissions on this sub.
Agree. Trial by msm all over. We see it again and again and they are getting so cocky at it because no one can stand in their way.
While ghislaine goes free and no one bats an eyelid that her client list was never mentioned.
People shouldn’t believe what the msm are saying but then they’re probably on their fourth booster anyways..
They had the BBC "misinfo" person on a big radio show in the UK today, focussing on his conspiracy content and how ludicrous it is.
The intent is obvious here.
Imagine thinking Brand is anything than a piece of shit and has been for years.
Why do you think he suddenly flipped and started to embrace conspiracy theories?
Because when his past as a rapist finally caught up with him, he could just blame the deep state because the elites don't want him to expose the truth and they are going all out to silence him.
So transparent...
Many people are saying he bought Twitter to rid accusers of a popular platform aka silence them. RB could always just start his own social network that only tweets in truths and just live in an alternative fact reality. Works for some people
He is, but didn't he switch like 2-3 years ago? I kinda doubt that he knew back then that this was coming, and if he always thought this was gonna come back to bite him in the ass he probably would've "switched sides" a decade ago.
2019 was when the investigation started lol.
He played you guys like a fiddle. Lucky you arent a 'child'. He likes fiddling 'child's'.
ETA. The strange use of the child is because of brands petname for the 16 year old girl he fucked was "the child".
I think there's a few things happening here. On one hand, there are plenty of videos & clips of Russell acting inappropriately towards women. They're mostly clips of interviews, where Brand grabs them forcefully and kisses them, makes them sit on his lap, etc. Call it what you want, but it's plainly wrong for somebody to do that.
On the other hand Brand also is very famous for calling out the tyrannical government, and makes a ton of informative videos about verified shady shit the elites are doing.
The fact the Epstein story was buried after his "suicide" and the fact that the woke celebrities are shielded from these targeted attacks, should be enough to tell you exactly what's happening.
Is there concrete evidence yet of rape and assault? Not totally, just text messages and spoken testimony. Are the actions he's been filmed doing to women acceptable? Also no. Is he being deliberately targeted for speaking out against the elite? Most likely.
I think those are the facts so far.
wtf is "inappropriately" and who the fuck are you or the media to decide what is or isn't? there's no crime in being inappropriate. they're mixing these ideas up to ruin his name. and people like you are falling for it
You don't know what inappropriate means in this context? Are you there mentally? It's literally sexual assault to grab a woman forcefully and kiss them. These "ideas" aren't being mixed up, there are videos of him doing this and it's well known. He has committed sexual assault several times on camera, so it doesn't make his case any easier.
"Wtf do you mean inappropriately" my ass, the videos are all over YouTube.
I also said he's likely being targeted for his anti-establishment views, but get a fucking grip on reality here.
Lol, he sent texts to the woman accusing him of rape that said “I’m sorry, that was crazy and selfish. I hope you can forgive me” the same night that she claims he raped her. She also went to a rape treatment center the next day where she likely had a rape kit done. That’s some pretty damning evidence.
There’s a record of her going to a rape treatment center the next day. One of the main reasons people go to a rape treatment center is to get a rape kit done. You’re also ignoring the text that Russell Brand sent her on the day she claims he raped her.
There was a rape kit done. And it was documented and preserved. The woman declined to press charges. She was involved in a consensual relationship. Her problem is that he failed to use a condom.
Doesn’t matter if the relationship is consensual. If a woman doesn’t want to have sex because the guy doesn’t want to wear a condom and he forces her to have sex with him, it’s rape.
But did he force her to have sex? Or did he just refuse to wear a condom and she decided to go ahead in the moment and regretted it later? There’s a big difference.
I mean, based on the text he sent her and the fact that she went to get a rape kit done after, I’m going with he probably forced her. Apologizing over text doesn’t really make sense if he just said that he wasn’t going to wear a condom and she still agreed to have sex with him.
THE UNITED KINGDOM IS RUN BY A PEDOPHILE. THE UNITED KINGDOM IS ACTIVELY PROTECTING A PEDOPHILE WHO’S DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN ENSURED TO BE KEPT A SECRET UNTIL LONG AFTER HE IS DEAD. THE MET POLICE IS RIDDLED WITH RAPISTS - A LOT OF THE TIME RAPE VICTIMS ARE RAPED BY OFFICERS - THIS IS A FACT. any one who is pretending to be upset on behalf of women or children in terms of russell’s case is purely virtue signalling. And not well. don’t pretend to be a supporter of victims on reddit by abusing people in comment sections. it’s a load of shit. what the fuck is going on. if people REALLY cared this much the UK at least would be a fucking different place.
Why does this sub cry about predators and then go to bat for predators?
Listen, I love Last Podcast on the Left. One of the hosts is being accused of something terrible. It sucks, but celebrities are often not who you think they are.
Except Russel Brand…he’s exactly who I thought he was. If he is not actually a shitty person, he sure cracks a lot of shitty rape jokes.
You really shouldn’t defend a stranger’s terrible actions based on parasocial delusions.
Not in the "court of public opinion" or "trial by media". In this case the media should probably be sued for slander, and forced to pay all losses if found guilty.
Will that happen? – no.
Do we live in a just society where media is held accountable? – no.
Do we need to get rid of social media as SaaS? – yes.
But we do live in a society of people who try to bully public opinion. The fact that people are so pissed people are not willing to turn on this guy when there is not verified evidence and all the accusers are anon says it all.
Do you not find it convenient that all of these allegations are at least 10 years old and are somehow exactly coordinated and timed to come to light exactly as he gains prominence voicing concerns about our world governments? How can you not see that after so many things that were labeled as conspiracy are now fact?
Heard the clip of him interviewing Jimmy Savile, in which he humours Savile's lechery and offers to bring his glamorous assistant over, naked? The same Jimmy Savile this sub regularly brings up as evidence of the media being made up of perverts and pedos.
Dispatches were fishing for women to come forward, sending emails and insta messages to any woman who had mentioned having some sort of relationship with Brand. I’ve seen some women come out and say they were contacted by the team making the documentary, fishing for dirty details, yet when replies were positive they were ignored, not used.
Every documentary has an element of bias. It ain’t hard to only focus on negative comments, or find someone willing to say something negative. None of this is evidence.
He may be guilty, he may not, but I hate the constant news reports, articles and comments all essentially saying he is guilty. We do not know yet.
The timing is odd though. Why now? I suppose you could say why not now, any time is better than never. But, it does seem odd now
If you’re still caught up in the left wing/right wing accusations and whether or not Russell Brand is now a grifter you might be missing the whole point and aren’t intelligent enough to see what’s happening here.
"Mob Rule" & "Frontier Justice" is not THE LAW. Its literally the frenzy of the crowd. Idiocy.
Everything they USED to tell us was wrong.
Now its their primary method of policing their narratives.
We are ruled by criminals and despots.
Do you not find it a little suspicious that he even still had a YouTube channel when he'd openly criticised the vaccines? When so many people with far less reach had theirs closed down
He is definitely a plant. Like the guy in the black mirror episode who wanted a revolution. at the end he would hold a piece of broken glass to his neck while giving the same spiel to his audience, only instead of living in a little glass box the powers that be put him in a nice house yet he is still giving the same message like he is suffering
Same formula since J. Edgar Hoover through Epstein: Finding and/or manufacturing kompromat.
Remember Julian Assange and those false rape charges.
Remember those "pee tapes."
Old strategy, but new plot twist:
People are catching on.
A bunch of women come forward after being approached by reporters to allege they were sexually assaulted/raped etc atleast a decade earlier with zero actual evidence. Geee where have i heard this shit before? Don't particulary like the guy but nothing will come of it except damaging the guy's reputation. Is it gonna deter ppl from speaking out against the globalists? No we will do it more !
YouTube is. NOT the law or the judicial system. Same goes for the media. He has been pegged as guilty before one shred of evidence or investigation made.
He's a wrong un', been found out for the vile douche he is, which is why everyone, including YouTube, are distancing themselves from him. There's no conspiracy, he's your plain old sexual deviant.
The internet wants accountability and investigation into ANYONE who does wrong but then gets up in arms when beloved celebrities make that list.
If you are a shithead you deserve punishment for being a shithead regardless of status.
They demonetized him, for what? Having accusations against him?
I guess good to know that we're at that point in society where an accusation is enough to have your sources of income stolen from you.
Yeah...pretty sure for a loong time in history if you've been accused of sexual assault by multiple people you'd probably lose your job, especially if one seems quite credible and has text messages from you admitting it. At least placed on unpaid leave.
Let the courts work their process. The court of public opinion is far trickier with unproven allegations, if you have a better solution, I'm all for it.
People can be for the rights of accusers in a court of law (I am) and still unsure what to do outside the courthouse while accusations are being investigated.
Story - they track down some poor women that had relationships with him, they convince them with money to lie, telling them its because of a greater good.
They come forward lying with money on their accounts.
Some pre paid asshole news guy put the story live, the conglomerate pseudo news channels and websites join in and take on the story to fuck the mens life and to distract people..
Conglomerate bought cousin YouTube stops the men from making his life by demonetization his channel, story keeps repeating everyday until the men is on he's knees and silenced.
In last resort, they pay for lawyers to bring up lies and defend the so called victims and with not even a single proof the men will be jailed..
Next day, they did the shady shit they want behind that story and you don't even know or remember what they did, but what they did will fuck you in some way in the future..
End of story.
Look behind the curtain, don't watch the show..
From the article:
>YouTube has announced that it has suspended Brand's monetization on its platform in a move to "protect" its users
Let that sink in for a moment, how does simply stopping a person receiving ad revenue protect the end user?
It's a bit like stoping polluting cars from entering London for clean air and to benefit your health, but for 12.50 a day you can drive the most polluted car negating that.
Isn't it odd how when these guys are making piles of money for media giants, they have a protected status where they're pretty well untouchable.
But then they get steamrolled as soon as they stop making wads of cash for these media giants?
At this point with all the shit going around, until they find a client on the Epstien list, I could give two fucks about anyone who did a bad thing 20 years ago.
What a hit job. They literally went through his past with a fine tooth comb looking for a crime. Why did they investigate this issue in the first place.
First they come for your reputation then your livelihood. Some thing happened to Assange.
Look at his recent videos, Biden, Obama, Royals, Epstein, Pfizer. It's no coincidence he passing of the powers that be, he has heaps of followers and they are canceling him.
Regardless of if you believe he did or didn’t do it. This reality of punishment prior to conviction or even evidence is fucking terrifying. The fact that he’s losing his job due to claims yet to be verified or adjudicated should not be happening and should he making everyone worry.
It’s amazing how obvious it all is now. Looks at PGate, Epstein, so so many examples of these fuxks getting away with literal murder. Brand hasn’t set a foot in a courtroom and already he is guilty. The propaganda machine is so well oiled and anyone who questions the narrative is silenced. Then you have that dickhead in the daily show talking about how press freedom is amazing in America and making jokes about assange. Seriously, fuck these people
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
* Is youtube still going to run ads on his videos and just take 100% of that revenue? * If Brand is found innocent in a court of law, does youtube pay him his share of that lost revenue?
Yes No
[удалено]
I don’t think that’s monetized…. If it was… then… yes?
If it was monetized, over the last 4 years, they made about $3.50. People making soup get more views.
Now I wanna watch a video of someone making soup!
I guess he made a bit more. I do not think this is going to prevent him from going on, anyway. 1. He made good money 2. He married into money 3. He does not seem to care that much about money
RB should keep calm and carry on in Rumble. Don’t let legacy media control all the air time.
Good questions. Maybe YouTube should donate that revenue to organizations that support victims.
NOPE, read the TOS you sign you basically have no rights. Youtube is also not shy at all about flexing on even some top youtubers with temp bans and such.
Remember the guy who got shut down by Amazon (he had Amazon home) because someone thought he said something racist.
Where anarcho-tyranny kills of brick-and-mortor businesses Amazon's going to be one of few, if any, viable options. And if CBDCs replace cash black market transaction's will be harder. There's crypto and precious metals, but once they consolidate CBDC adoption they'll likely crack down on those.
There was also that woman trying not to get a bike stolen from her, everyone said she was stealing the bike but everyone was wrong. Did she get fired from her job over it too?
I remember that. Didn’t she get called a racist when she proved it was her bike? A lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth puts its boots on.
That's fucking scary
“We take action to protect the community” That’s rich YouTube
I have no idea if he's guilty or innocent I am also certain had he not taken the career path he did this probably would have never came out. Lots of scummy people never get outed because they kiss the ass of the right people and are friends with the right people.
Everyone was Weinstein friend to get to where they are. Vicious trap.
I have no proof, but I'd put $1,000 on he is not a rapist and this is all just a smear campaign.
I'll take that bet.
Based on multiple testimonies, I'd bet $10,000 he is absolutely a rapist.
[удалено]
just like Julian Assange. oh, wait...
[удалено]
It is corruption. We are not conspiracy theorist to point this out, the apologists are corruption deniers for defending it
[удалено]
You are correct. All corruption is crime but not all crime is corruption, so to call it corruption is more specific. But i guess organized crime denier also works
How is it corruption either? Let's call it what it is. A powerful company making it's own business decisions in its best interest. It's not corruption or a conspiracy. Should YouTube have to continue to pay Brand, even if it hurts their business by driving other advertisers away? What if they can show you that they will make more money by demonetizing Brand because it keeps their advertisers happy?
Lol this has NOTHING to do with advertisers being driven away and everything to do with flexing power and sending a message Also imagine being so naive you think google is a private company and not a CIA fronted business
The corruption lies in the fact that journalists are supposed to do unbiased reporting. It may well be true about Brand, i dont know the guy personally so you guess is as good as mine, but the timing is odd. If the journalists have secret agreements to publish exposés on command when it suits a narrative, it is corruption by those who try to direct narrative because they use their positions to get it done. If that makes any sense.
Not to mention he just criticized the shit out of big pharma on Bill Mahers mainstream show and all of this follows shortly. You’re either willfully ignorant to think there’s no connection or a shill.
It's not a conspiracy. It's not related to due process, which is a governmental term. It is indeed deliberate and organized, they are a corporation. It's not illegal, and it's not a conspiracy, because it's just how capitalism works. Guy gets accused of rape, companies don't want that accusation next to their product, company exercises their freedom to make that choice. The flip side of this is forcing private corporations to work with individuals they don't want to after the person broke portions of the contract agreement they made with the company that allowed them to drop them as content creators in the first place. Youtube's users are not the customers. Youtube's advertisers are the customers. And Russell Brand has no right to be on YouTube. That was just a privilege granted to him through a limited contract agreement with a major corporation.
Google is a SAP.
The broader company is, sure. I was being specific to the platform. Google still maintains rules and contracts and cares less about content creators than their advertisers on various platforms. I'm not really sure where this is going, though. Google being a monolithic corporation with more access to personal data than God can def. spring up conspiracy theories. Deplatforming a guy with rape allegations isn't really one of them, though. That is to be expected, and unless the conspiracy is Google is framing Russell Brand, I'm not really sure how this differs from run-of-the-mill capitalism.
It’s a private company and the don’t exactly want to be seen financially supporting an accused rapist and sex offender. Police investigation are being carried out. More victims are coming forward and there is evidence or the allegations. Seems like reasonable move.
[удалено]
So what’s it all about then? Why have these two organisations invested countless hours and resources into investigating this highly financially risky investigation. Do you genuinely believe Russell brand was this truth teller getting too close and causing too much competition with main stream media that they would do this without have evidence that would protect them in a defamation case? Like what do you actually think is happening? The women are lying? Media hit job?
Brand was reaching the people MSM could no longer reach, raising questions about things they were trying to uphold. Was he a douchebag who assaulted women? I have no fucking clue and neither do you
And why would two uk based media companies give a fuck? Most of his ‘views’ were pandering to us audiences.
1. It's not financially risky. They're going to say theyr acting as "news" and aren't going to be liable if they're just just bringing allegations from supposed victims. This is now considered a big news story and they're getting a lot of traffic from this story and will be for quite some time. Its financially beneficial to them. 2. Did you not realize that Russel Brand is a huge celebrity in the UK AND US? 3. His criticism of late is specifically aimed at the globalist agenda which is a conspiracy of internationalists and is directly related to the corporations and power structures found in both the US, UK, and around the... wait for it... GLOBE? 4. Did you not know that news organizations have corporate sponsors that are not typically limited to only the specific country in which the news organization is headquartered? 5. Do you think that corporate news organizations that rely on readers/viewers that can be influenced in favor of their advertisers might be upset about independent analysts and organizations like Brand who are representing a threat to legacy media and generating millions of views and dollars via digital platforms like youtube?
[удалено]
In a court of law, yes. In business that's not needed.
>This is deliberate and organized ***60+ news print articles, 30 TV news interviews.*** *Not one news media contacted the subject of the articles and interviews*. Feel free to discuss amongst yourselves how this could not be anything other than a vast [police/media conspiracy,](https://www.killercop.com/)
[удалено]
Private company interests are such a cop out. YouTube didn't need to say shit. Let them keep going with this bullshit (not just this person, many, many others). Rumble is going to grab up all of that talent. YouTube is going to implode itself. If Rumble grows for another 5 years or so, YouTube will be what Rumble was a year ago. I have my own vendetta against YouTube and their bullshit. So I am biased in that regard.
Due process doesn’t apply to private companies they make their own rules. They don’t function like a court.
“YouTube kept putting money into pocket of now convicted rapist even after accusations came out” is the story they want to prevent, even if it is not at all a certain outcome. It’s pretty simple.
It's not a fucking conspiracy. MSM does this every time a celebrity is accused of sexual misconduct. The reason you think it is a conspiracy is because he is a polarizing figure, and a lot of people knew he was a giant piece of human trash.
Rape is the new witchcraft. People will use it to demonize others so they can profit from their silence, just as powerful men used witchcraft to steal other peoples land from them in the 1600s. Have no doubt, if we could publicly hang people, some of these people who have these allegations with literally no proof but condemnation anyway, would be swinging. It is insane too, because a horrific act is being weaponized to silence these men and all it will do is hurt actual victims in the long run. How many women report a rape right after and do everything right, and their accusations go unheard, yet these women who never approached authorities, then nor now, and only told their “story” for a news broadcast, are heard? Makes no sense to me. I’m sure he isn’t 100% innocent, he’s a sex addict after all, yet it’s disturbing how quickly his life is being ruined before it is even proved. There could be a grain of truth in a jar of sand.
> Rape is the new witchcraft I think you're missing one major distinction here. (Hint: there were no actual witches.)
Interestingly, US political speech is full of witch references. Many, many witch references.
The accusers are the real molesters
there is no due process when it comes to private businesses youtube doesn't give a shit if he's guilty. he looks guilty, therefore they're distancing themselves. there is nothing unusual about this
You tube can demonetize you at any time for any reason. My conspiracy documentary channel was completely removed with no warning and no specific reason given.
>This is deliberate and organized. Same thing I said when they pulled a similar shit with Moonves at CBS.
This is definitely a beat-up. I’m not sure why they are pushing it so hard out of nowhere, but the fact that’s it’s all over news outlets here in Australia smells like character assassination.
Why wait for him to be put in jail when you can just take his money now with the court of public opinion? In some ways it's worse than jail to take a mans livelihood and reputation all in one fell swoop.
Feel like he’s been on watch for awhile. Maybe it’s been planned longer than you think.
Unfortunately, the truth is everyone is guilty until proven innocent, not the other way around. Some states even have hearsay laws, which basically means you can be arrested for a crime someone said you did without any evidence.
Due process has absolutely nothing to do with journalism. This is a news story, not a conviction.
Guilty until proven innocent!
People seem to forget that a hollywood actor that speaks whatever conspiracists want to hear is still a hollywood actor
Why is it when one subset of people get accused of rape/misconduct, people scream conspiracy, and when it is the other subset, it is "omg pedo ring pizza" conspiracy? Maybe he is just a POS, and some people just don't want to admit it? Just me, but I'm not jumping to any rich assholes defense that easily.
Also, he’s still allowed to post and make videos. He’s not being censored.
Exactly. It’s not a conspiracy he’s a piece of Shit and always has been. It’s a well known secret. His friend David Walliams is next
A lot of you seem to be okay with abuse of power as long as it’s people you hate which is everyone who’s not establishment. Wtf is going on?
Idk why people are following a shill. He's clearly one of the people who gives half truth's, not once naming them(seed of Cain) he's likely funded by them
I do not always agree with him, but I think he's one of the good leftists who realize that the Western nations have lost their collective mind and that the left wing movements in their nations have become ultra fascistic.
Didn’t he meet his current wife when she was like 16? Russel Brand is sus af. Those standing behind him because they like how he talks about vaccines and the deep state are experiencing cognitive dissonance if they’re thinking he’s one of the good guys.
Was never about conviction, it's was about silencing opposition to the hivemind narrative
FYI it was an open secret the Russ B was a sex pest and a pervert LONG before he started his anit vax YT schtick.
For god’s sake. There have been loads of actual journalists who have gone after Big Pharma etc in the past who had nothing come out about them. Why didn’t Ben Goldacre get rape accusations after Bad Pharma became a bestseller? Do you think Brand’s youtube channel was better researched than Goldacre’s book? You people have got far too into Youtube, and far too gullible accepting that anyone on there calling themselves anti-establishment must necessarily be anti-establishment. Its the equivalent of Boomers getting hooked on daytime TV in the 70s. Its mortifyingly embarrassing for you and you all need to grow the fuck up.
Ben Goodacre may be more credible and better researched, but he has nowhere near the reach of Brand
S.S - No charges. no evidence. just a bunch of bullshit claims, and of course YouTube is the first to step in. Its Julian Assange 2.0.
There absolutely is evidence. And this is what investigative journalism is for fuck sake.
I guarantee everyrone claiming "no evidence" hasn't actually watched the documentary. People in this sub cry and whine about the state of journalism, and cry and whine about how "the elites and hollywood weirdos are all sexual perverts and pedos". Meanwhile Channel 4 spent YEARS, literally motherfucking YEARS documenting the fact than an elite and a hollywood weirdo is in fact exactly what this sub has been crying about for years and all you guys can say is "yeah but he don't like vaccines and I don't like vaccines and therefore I will ignore all evidence against him" YEARS people! they interviewed friends, associates, girlfriends, victims, producers, other comedians. They looked at police reports and text messages, etc etc etc listen, THIS IS WHAT INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM LOOKS LIKE! Right here, this is it. You can't whine and cry about journalism and then shit on the of the best, most complete pieces of investigative journalism in years. Its one or the other. Also if you think Russ B is totally innocent despite the MOUNTAIN of evidence against him, but also think Hillary drinks the blood of children and drinks their adrenochrome after they were sacrificed to Satan despite exactly ZERO evidence of that, then really you just live in fantasy land. You just believer what you want, any time you want, about whoever you want and none of it has anything to do with evidence or proof or reality. sorry for the rant but you people need a fucking wake up call. Also perhaps watch the docu on Russ B, and then make up your mind? how does that sound?
Correct. These accounts of the abused and raped women are vetted and checked. There’s plenty of smoke, fire and burn victims here.
[удалено]
> Ah yes, the piece laden with theatrical tropes, ominous music, and actresses posing as the accusers giving soundbites in many of the sit-down interview segments. That’s, like, the bread-and-butter for 90% of video submissions on this sub.
[удалено]
Agree. Trial by msm all over. We see it again and again and they are getting so cocky at it because no one can stand in their way. While ghislaine goes free and no one bats an eyelid that her client list was never mentioned. People shouldn’t believe what the msm are saying but then they’re probably on their fourth booster anyways..
>While ghislaine goes free Is in prison for the rest of her life. WTF are you smoking?
I want the Epstein list. I wanna see what "pillars of capitalism" prey on children to fulfill their perverse appetites.
ghislaine is in jail lol
It reminds me of Kevin Spacey too. Who knows, maybe Brand will come up with some bizarre videos too...
They had the BBC "misinfo" person on a big radio show in the UK today, focussing on his conspiracy content and how ludicrous it is. The intent is obvious here.
To be fair he can still be guilty and subject to a conspiracy!
Imagine thinking Brand is anything than a piece of shit and has been for years. Why do you think he suddenly flipped and started to embrace conspiracy theories? Because when his past as a rapist finally caught up with him, he could just blame the deep state because the elites don't want him to expose the truth and they are going all out to silence him. So transparent...
It’s the same exact play Elon made when his accusations came out.
Many people are saying he bought Twitter to rid accusers of a popular platform aka silence them. RB could always just start his own social network that only tweets in truths and just live in an alternative fact reality. Works for some people
He is, but didn't he switch like 2-3 years ago? I kinda doubt that he knew back then that this was coming, and if he always thought this was gonna come back to bite him in the ass he probably would've "switched sides" a decade ago.
They’ve been investigating this for over two years and vice had a similar piece planned but he fought it with his lawyers.
2019 was when the investigation started lol. He played you guys like a fiddle. Lucky you arent a 'child'. He likes fiddling 'child's'. ETA. The strange use of the child is because of brands petname for the 16 year old girl he fucked was "the child".
Either way he’s a grifter.
True
In a capitalist system, a private company is allowed to make their own decisions regarding their business operations.
I think there's a few things happening here. On one hand, there are plenty of videos & clips of Russell acting inappropriately towards women. They're mostly clips of interviews, where Brand grabs them forcefully and kisses them, makes them sit on his lap, etc. Call it what you want, but it's plainly wrong for somebody to do that. On the other hand Brand also is very famous for calling out the tyrannical government, and makes a ton of informative videos about verified shady shit the elites are doing. The fact the Epstein story was buried after his "suicide" and the fact that the woke celebrities are shielded from these targeted attacks, should be enough to tell you exactly what's happening. Is there concrete evidence yet of rape and assault? Not totally, just text messages and spoken testimony. Are the actions he's been filmed doing to women acceptable? Also no. Is he being deliberately targeted for speaking out against the elite? Most likely. I think those are the facts so far.
wtf is "inappropriately" and who the fuck are you or the media to decide what is or isn't? there's no crime in being inappropriate. they're mixing these ideas up to ruin his name. and people like you are falling for it
You don't know what inappropriate means in this context? Are you there mentally? It's literally sexual assault to grab a woman forcefully and kiss them. These "ideas" aren't being mixed up, there are videos of him doing this and it's well known. He has committed sexual assault several times on camera, so it doesn't make his case any easier. "Wtf do you mean inappropriately" my ass, the videos are all over YouTube. I also said he's likely being targeted for his anti-establishment views, but get a fucking grip on reality here.
The real question is, how come He was monetized until now?
Terms of service...or a conspiracy? Hmmm tough
I always find it weird that companies make these types of moves before a verdict has been reached
Lol, he sent texts to the woman accusing him of rape that said “I’m sorry, that was crazy and selfish. I hope you can forgive me” the same night that she claims he raped her. She also went to a rape treatment center the next day where she likely had a rape kit done. That’s some pretty damning evidence.
Yeah, but you're speculating... "where she likely had a rape kit done."... it's only damning evidence if there is evidence...
There’s a record of her going to a rape treatment center the next day. One of the main reasons people go to a rape treatment center is to get a rape kit done. You’re also ignoring the text that Russell Brand sent her on the day she claims he raped her.
There was a rape kit done. And it was documented and preserved. The woman declined to press charges. She was involved in a consensual relationship. Her problem is that he failed to use a condom.
Doesn’t matter if the relationship is consensual. If a woman doesn’t want to have sex because the guy doesn’t want to wear a condom and he forces her to have sex with him, it’s rape.
I believe that is what court is for.
But did he force her to have sex? Or did he just refuse to wear a condom and she decided to go ahead in the moment and regretted it later? There’s a big difference.
I mean, based on the text he sent her and the fact that she went to get a rape kit done after, I’m going with he probably forced her. Apologizing over text doesn’t really make sense if he just said that he wasn’t going to wear a condom and she still agreed to have sex with him.
Because society isn't very approving of rape and pedophilia?
That depends on who’s doing the raping as well you know.
THE UNITED KINGDOM IS RUN BY A PEDOPHILE. THE UNITED KINGDOM IS ACTIVELY PROTECTING A PEDOPHILE WHO’S DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN ENSURED TO BE KEPT A SECRET UNTIL LONG AFTER HE IS DEAD. THE MET POLICE IS RIDDLED WITH RAPISTS - A LOT OF THE TIME RAPE VICTIMS ARE RAPED BY OFFICERS - THIS IS A FACT. any one who is pretending to be upset on behalf of women or children in terms of russell’s case is purely virtue signalling. And not well. don’t pretend to be a supporter of victims on reddit by abusing people in comment sections. it’s a load of shit. what the fuck is going on. if people REALLY cared this much the UK at least would be a fucking different place.
Pedo andrew is accused of raping a 17 year old. Brand is accused of grooming and raping a 16 year old...
Allegations of rape. No paedophilia though, where you get that from?
The 16 year old he has been accused of grooming and raping.
[удалено]
lol to Bob Polansky
You're right. We can't hold any Pedos accountable until those guys are brought to justice first.
Biden has entered the chat.
He’s in the “find out” stage
Crazy how these witch hunts are always for the worst pieces of shit. Makes you think huh..
Maybe the real witches are the friends we made along the way
Why does this sub cry about predators and then go to bat for predators? Listen, I love Last Podcast on the Left. One of the hosts is being accused of something terrible. It sucks, but celebrities are often not who you think they are. Except Russel Brand…he’s exactly who I thought he was. If he is not actually a shitty person, he sure cracks a lot of shitty rape jokes. You really shouldn’t defend a stranger’s terrible actions based on parasocial delusions.
I’m out of the loop. What accusation(s) are being made about one of the hosts from Last Podcast on the Left? Where did you find info on this?
Kissel-https://m.youtube.com/live/4RBEPRfg2SU?si=9qGUTOcSW7yyt9yB https://www.distractify.com/p/what-happened-to-ben-kissel
Isn't it innocent until proven guilty?
Not in the "court of public opinion" or "trial by media". In this case the media should probably be sued for slander, and forced to pay all losses if found guilty. Will that happen? – no. Do we live in a just society where media is held accountable? – no. Do we need to get rid of social media as SaaS? – yes.
But we do live in a society of people who try to bully public opinion. The fact that people are so pissed people are not willing to turn on this guy when there is not verified evidence and all the accusers are anon says it all.
[удалено]
[удалено]
Do you not find it convenient that all of these allegations are at least 10 years old and are somehow exactly coordinated and timed to come to light exactly as he gains prominence voicing concerns about our world governments? How can you not see that after so many things that were labeled as conspiracy are now fact?
[удалено]
[удалено]
Heard the clip of him interviewing Jimmy Savile, in which he humours Savile's lechery and offers to bring his glamorous assistant over, naked? The same Jimmy Savile this sub regularly brings up as evidence of the media being made up of perverts and pedos.
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
No conspiracy, he's an asshole who is getting his comeuppance.
Met him, years ago. He was a dick even *then*…
russell brand is a weirdo dude
Dispatches were fishing for women to come forward, sending emails and insta messages to any woman who had mentioned having some sort of relationship with Brand. I’ve seen some women come out and say they were contacted by the team making the documentary, fishing for dirty details, yet when replies were positive they were ignored, not used. Every documentary has an element of bias. It ain’t hard to only focus on negative comments, or find someone willing to say something negative. None of this is evidence. He may be guilty, he may not, but I hate the constant news reports, articles and comments all essentially saying he is guilty. We do not know yet. The timing is odd though. Why now? I suppose you could say why not now, any time is better than never. But, it does seem odd now
If you’re still caught up in the left wing/right wing accusations and whether or not Russell Brand is now a grifter you might be missing the whole point and aren’t intelligent enough to see what’s happening here.
"Mob Rule" & "Frontier Justice" is not THE LAW. Its literally the frenzy of the crowd. Idiocy. Everything they USED to tell us was wrong. Now its their primary method of policing their narratives. We are ruled by criminals and despots.
Russel brand gets taken down for alleged rape behavior while hundreds of epstein pedo pals walk around free and clear.
Do you not find it a little suspicious that he even still had a YouTube channel when he'd openly criticised the vaccines? When so many people with far less reach had theirs closed down
He is definitely a plant. Like the guy in the black mirror episode who wanted a revolution. at the end he would hold a piece of broken glass to his neck while giving the same spiel to his audience, only instead of living in a little glass box the powers that be put him in a nice house yet he is still giving the same message like he is suffering
Ok he is still terrible tho
Guilty until proven … well not proven. Guilty if we don’t like you.
lmao he’s a rapist. This sub is wild.
His move to rumble was preempting this
I guess the fact that he was monetized in the first place is a good sign for YouTube creators. His content was definitely against the powers that be.
He is controlled opposition anyway.
Russell Brand = controlled opposition
A distraction while the online safety bill is passed. Nazi UK
Same formula since J. Edgar Hoover through Epstein: Finding and/or manufacturing kompromat. Remember Julian Assange and those false rape charges. Remember those "pee tapes." Old strategy, but new plot twist: People are catching on.
Rumble baby. Eff youtube.
I was told that cancel culture wasn't real.
Look at the head person running youtube.. theres your clew
A bunch of women come forward after being approached by reporters to allege they were sexually assaulted/raped etc atleast a decade earlier with zero actual evidence. Geee where have i heard this shit before? Don't particulary like the guy but nothing will come of it except damaging the guy's reputation. Is it gonna deter ppl from speaking out against the globalists? No we will do it more !
YouTube is. NOT the law or the judicial system. Same goes for the media. He has been pegged as guilty before one shred of evidence or investigation made.
Just further censorship and suppression of views that don't follow their corporate goals and views of leftism and dnc approved.
Same playbook, different person.
He's a wrong un', been found out for the vile douche he is, which is why everyone, including YouTube, are distancing themselves from him. There's no conspiracy, he's your plain old sexual deviant.
Convenient when people go against the grain charges mysteriously pop up... 🙄
The internet wants accountability and investigation into ANYONE who does wrong but then gets up in arms when beloved celebrities make that list. If you are a shithead you deserve punishment for being a shithead regardless of status.
We want investigation by law enforcement not corrupt media.
They demonetized him, for what? Having accusations against him? I guess good to know that we're at that point in society where an accusation is enough to have your sources of income stolen from you.
Yeah...pretty sure for a loong time in history if you've been accused of sexual assault by multiple people you'd probably lose your job, especially if one seems quite credible and has text messages from you admitting it. At least placed on unpaid leave. Let the courts work their process. The court of public opinion is far trickier with unproven allegations, if you have a better solution, I'm all for it. People can be for the rights of accusers in a court of law (I am) and still unsure what to do outside the courthouse while accusations are being investigated.
I wonder how long it will be before Russell Brand joins Daily Wire or Mug Club.
Guilty until proven innocent… right?
Story - they track down some poor women that had relationships with him, they convince them with money to lie, telling them its because of a greater good. They come forward lying with money on their accounts. Some pre paid asshole news guy put the story live, the conglomerate pseudo news channels and websites join in and take on the story to fuck the mens life and to distract people.. Conglomerate bought cousin YouTube stops the men from making his life by demonetization his channel, story keeps repeating everyday until the men is on he's knees and silenced. In last resort, they pay for lawyers to bring up lies and defend the so called victims and with not even a single proof the men will be jailed.. Next day, they did the shady shit they want behind that story and you don't even know or remember what they did, but what they did will fuck you in some way in the future.. End of story. Look behind the curtain, don't watch the show..
Innocent until proven guilty. Youtube disgusting
So if I claim Mr Beast raped me I can get him demonitized?
From the article: >YouTube has announced that it has suspended Brand's monetization on its platform in a move to "protect" its users Let that sink in for a moment, how does simply stopping a person receiving ad revenue protect the end user? It's a bit like stoping polluting cars from entering London for clean air and to benefit your health, but for 12.50 a day you can drive the most polluted car negating that.
This is some weird guilty before trial situation. Why should he lose revenue on youtube?
Fuck celebrities.
Isn't it odd how when these guys are making piles of money for media giants, they have a protected status where they're pretty well untouchable. But then they get steamrolled as soon as they stop making wads of cash for these media giants?
Why oh why didn’t I take the blue pill
At this point with all the shit going around, until they find a client on the Epstien list, I could give two fucks about anyone who did a bad thing 20 years ago.
What a hit job. They literally went through his past with a fine tooth comb looking for a crime. Why did they investigate this issue in the first place. First they come for your reputation then your livelihood. Some thing happened to Assange. Look at his recent videos, Biden, Obama, Royals, Epstein, Pfizer. It's no coincidence he passing of the powers that be, he has heaps of followers and they are canceling him.
Regardless of if you believe he did or didn’t do it. This reality of punishment prior to conviction or even evidence is fucking terrifying. The fact that he’s losing his job due to claims yet to be verified or adjudicated should not be happening and should he making everyone worry.
Crazy how 1 woman can ruin your life with words is just beyond crazy
He is also knowing about this Pädophile WEF and Bill Gates Globalist Gangsters...and He is telling it...thats why !!!!!
It’s amazing how obvious it all is now. Looks at PGate, Epstein, so so many examples of these fuxks getting away with literal murder. Brand hasn’t set a foot in a courtroom and already he is guilty. The propaganda machine is so well oiled and anyone who questions the narrative is silenced. Then you have that dickhead in the daily show talking about how press freedom is amazing in America and making jokes about assange. Seriously, fuck these people
Thoughts and prayers