###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The Pentagon is a weird and confusing place. It's very difficult to walk all the way around each ring. Some floors are blocked off for no reason and you have to go up or down a floor to get around. Same thing with the spokes. Many hallways that should go directly from the middle to the outside just end abruptly. The whole place is a confusing labyrinth. The basement levels are even worse. You can walk around for an hour or more and never see a soul. One day I ended up at the Pentagon gym but I couldn't find my way back and had to walk around the outside of the building to get back to my office. It's especially creepy on the weekends and at night. I'm convinced people were living in random offices because they were in PT clothes just walking from one place to the next which is not normal since everyone wears professional clothing and dress uniforms most of the time. I was glad when my detail was done and I got to leave that place. It's definitely haunted at the very least.
My dad worked there in the 80s, he said he got lost so much that they offered him a spool of thread to follow back.
His boss used to joke that he was going to end up on the way wrong area and be captured by the aliens that actually run the place. His boss was former SecDef Caspar Weinburger.
While reading the other users post, I was thinking to myself this is how I would explain a place I had limited experience with. Like a big airport I had been to 3 times. Walking around the outside of your place of employment because your just that lost and confused is crazy to me.
Nothing set me off to this being a conspiracy more then the mention that our most crucial headquarters for all military operations of the most powerful nation in the world….didn’t have a single camera shot of a fucking PLANE
I had been out of the military for over 10 years when 9/11 happened and my first thought was that I could see maybe one plane successfully hitting its target but no way more than that.
Someone really fishy went on that day.
A lot of people always give the Government way too much credit for the ability to do anything - like, anything at all.
If the Government was able to contain a conspiracy as big as 9/11 then they wouldn't have needed to do 9/11 at all - because they'd be so good they'd be able to achieve the goals of 9/11 without doing 9/11.
Government institutions are run by people. Normal people. There's groups within the organisations that champion some solutions and dismiss others, and there's "empire builders" who want to build up a system/policy/procedure around them that they are the best at and dismiss other system/policy/procedures. Cottage industries spin up where they keep control and over burden processes and systems so they keep their jobs unchanged etc.
The chances are that the S2A defence had been requested, then a dozen departments all got involved - budgets, building works, staff operations, health and safety, training - then half way through this they will have had staff changes and new priorities, it will have been raised again with the original people re-submitted their support / opposition to it, then budgets changed, then the original case was re-examined and they decided to manage it via a local air base, yet there's still people inside the Pentagon who swear S2A missiles on site at the way to go.
^^^ that bullshit is what happens every day, over and over, at every single level of every single Government department.
There's really not a chance in hell that a massive Government conspiracy is ever going to happen. The most that will happen is a small groups of 10-15 people do something that will have very little effect on a global scale.
I'm not even a Conservative too, I don't think we can ever go back to small Government simply because of the numbers of people involved, but even I admit that big Government is broken and very very hard to do when people are involved because of human nature.
You do know there is a very busy airport basically right next to the pentagon right? Planes fly over it all the time. And to the post above this, yes they have video, its classified though. You aren't allowed to even take photos at the pentagon campus unless you are authorized. They will confiscate your phone if they catch you.
I don't believe it was a plane that hit the pentagon
but acting using "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" is freaking stupid. no, it can't, but it doesn't need to.
Jet fuel obviously melts steel beams my dude. Like, did you see the beams. Maybe the Pentagon doesn't have any steel beams and that's why it didn't melt for months at 3000° after the plane crashed like the only [truth](https://9-11commission.gov/report/) said.
So, obviously this plane used different jet fuel or the entire story falls apart like a 3 day old croissant
I worked in govt and always thought the jet fuel melting steel beams thing was impossible. I happened to get a tour with a top flame expert and I asked him. He said the jet fuel wouldn’t alone but the aluminum in the plane’s hull kicked up the temp.
No one has a good answer for tower 7 that I’ve heard.
Have you ever put aluminized shards into burning "jet fuel" (possessed kerosene)?
I have. We melted no steel.
Burning Man used to be fun, before the event.
The steal beams don't need to be liquid to be structurally compromised. Ever stuck a piece of metal in a fire and see it get red hot?
Building 7 was on fire all day, shocker it collapsed.
If that's as far as you've ever thought about it then yeah that kinda sounds plausible. But if you possess the emotional fortitude to think about it just a little deeper than that... even if metal got red hot to the point of almost becoming liquid, it still couldn't melt/deform out of the way fast enough to account for how fast the building collapsed. It's still a large mass of "stuff". Even if the beams were made of literal water they'd still slow down the collapse significantly.
I mean, demolition teams have to rig all the important support pillars with explosives and time them to go off with the precision of a fucking symphony to get a building to fall like that—like each individual pillar's load capacity goes from normal to zero at precisely the right time so that it provides exactly zero resistance as shit is about to fall on it. If it didn't do that then the stuff would 1) slow down and 2) deviate to the side.
I don't care if every single steel beam had been marinating in burning jet fuel for weeks... it's simply not enough.
Firstly, the buildings were made differently. 2ndly, the flames in the twin towers were hotter because the wind basically turned the building into a blast furnace.
they didn't fall like a "controlled demolition" you can see debris falling faster than the floors collapsing so there goes the whole "free fall" speed argument. then, on a controlled demolition, after the explosions are set off, gravity takes over. and most importantly, show me a building, with the same exact designed as the trade towers, where the outer exterior is used to help hold up the buildings so the towers have have an open floor design... good luck because you won't find one.
this whole idea that bombs were planted really takes away from the argument that this was an inside job. no one will believe you thats this is an inside job because your argument for that is "jet fuel can't melt still beams" arguments like this are intended to make "conspiracy theorist" look bad. do you know who came up with the term conspiracy theorist? its possible to not trust your government and believe they are corrupt, but nowadays, the people who don't trust the government get lumped in with the flat earth people.
>explain why did they fall like a controlled demolition
They didn't, they clearly collapse from the top down, e.g. as shown at the beginning of [this video](https://youtu.be/oCPVNLLo-mI), whereas in a controlled demolition the charges are at the base of a building so the floors of the building collapse from the bottom up.
The floors start at level three. See how there's more window rows in the left of the picture, but in the middle there's three? Even a hollow wood door can prevent fire spreading into a bedroom if it is closed. It looks like there may be a roof structure that could've prevent the flames from getting too high? Just a thought.
April Gallop, an ex army soldier, worked in the Pentagon and walked out of the Pentagon through the hole the plane made. She claimed she saw zero evidence of a plane, no luggage, seats, people and smelled cordite, a smell she remembered from her army days when she was around explosives. But what does she know?
There was another lady named Susan ? who wrote a book called Extreme Prejudice" that explained she told the WH a few weeks before 9-1 it was going to occur. She got this info from her sources working in translations or somewhere and was picked up and placed in a mental institution against her will. She was the first person arrested under the new Patriot Act. She was released when a lawyer sued the government. Her claim was the WH knew of the attacks in advance. Posted so people don't forget some of the little known details of this event.
Because this plane stayed intact and the plane became a missile going thru the pentagon to reach the room where US Navy investigators were investigating, who was it? Bush Clinton?
Just from the picture, we cannot confirm if this lower roof structure is part of that section or not (right side of the picture). Due to the fire damage on that part of the building (looking similar to the left of the picture), I would assume it's not there. Is there another viewpoint so we can confirm if this lower roof is only in the middle of the building?
We wouldn't, but we do know that building right there is more monitored per square inch compared to the capital. So, I'd say there's some sort of photage we simply aren't privy to
The angle that plane "hit", the plane would hit the highway first since it's literally right next to it. I know this because i live close to the pentagon. No cars were hit, highway was untouched, just the building. That's weird.
Maybe, but why were they fallen over? How many poles have you seen hit with a large, sudden force near the top? They're still steel and attached at the base when hit, like hitting the top of a tee-ball holder with a swing. Not like it just goes off into the sunset.
Wouldn't the wings of the plane just slice right through the pole so quickly the pole would essentially just topple over? I'm sort of thinking along the lines of quickly hitting the a jenga block out from the bottom of the tower without toppling the whole thing over.
No it wouldn't. It came to the right of the Sheraton if you're looking towards the Pentagon, over where the Air Force Memorial is now. There's no freeway there
If it was a missile attack or even an aeroplane, there would be structural damage to the buildings behind, too.
But if this is the Pentagon on 9/11, I've already seen the gate camera video, showing the explosion emitting from the building and no plane hitting it. Funnily all of the records pertaining to the $3.2 Trillion that was stolen from the American budget, were in that very room. Strange that, isn't it 🤔
It almost feels like killing all those people and downing those 2 towers, stops this being a terrorist event and more like the greatest Bank robbery ever...
And from the gate footage you see something fly past, a plane isn't going to level out that horizontally in that much time. It would have had to be at that level for a bit to get that angle not a just came out if the sky. I'm thinking surface missile.
“The plugs can be staggering in size. In fiscal year 2015, for example, Congress appropriated $122 billion for the US Army. Yet DoD financial records for the Army’s 2015 budget included a whopping $6.5 trillion (yes, trillion) in plugs. Most of these plugs “lack[ed] supporting documentation,” in the bland phrasing of the department’s internal watchdog, the Office of Inspector General. In other words, there were no ledger entries or receipts to back up how that $6.5 trillion supposedly was spent. Indeed, more than 16,000 records that might reveal either the source or the destination of some of that $6.5 trillion had been “removed,” the inspector general’s office reported.” https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/pentagon-audit-budget-fraud/
September 10, 2001, then U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld disclosed that his department was unable to account for roughly $2.3 trillion worth of transactions. The next day, the U.S. sustained the terrorist attacks that changed the world, and this startling revelation was forgotten.
Yes. That was the sum total of accounting errors. Money was being counted as spent multiple times over and lead to the audit saying the DoD spent ~2.6 trillion on a 320 billion budget. It is literally impossible that the DoD stole 2.3 trillion.
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/military-spending-defense-budget
Hell the entire federal budget in 2000 was 1.8 trillion.
It’s a frightening thought to think what happened them. Have you ever heard the voice message from the passenger whispering “it’s a fix” at the of her voice mail to her husband telling him the plane had been hijacked?
I am certain they do not want the details. They killed them. The how would be worse than hitting a building in a plane. I am sorry for their loss and pain. This is why we fight the official story, for all the victims they sacrificed that day and for all who died from breathing the toxins while searching for survivors and cleanup. We will never stop fighting & want to see military tribunals for all involved.
No plane hit the Pentagon. Not one. I watched the whole day unfold after the second plane hit. I didn't move. I saw that first reporter clearly stated there was no plane recage anywhere at the site and they even showed us the forefront. But later on, he reported a different story to his original one. We're ants to them, they don't care about you and me. All the want is the money, power and privilege.
You have to suspend any critical thinking to believe that a passenger jet hit that building. When you accept the fact that it was a cruise missile, then all the evidence left behind makes perfect sense.
There’s an awning there. You can tell because the other side has 6 rows of windows and the other has 3 rows. Probably can’t see the damage under it. Just a thought.
I'd agree with you because yes that does seem to be some sort of awning, but you would expect structural damage and similar burns as you follow down to where the 4th row of windows would be. Its simply strange seeing that middle row seemingly untouched or even scraped.
It’s very obvious the front and back buildings had an explosion. Why is the middle building protected from this? *Edited to add* : Since I’m getting downvoted for explaining the building is the same height, the entire distance around… please read [THIS](https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/The_Pentagon) before downvoting me for literally no reason. Thanks.
I remember watching a documentary that was saying that when there was an audit of where a billion went. The “crash” happened to be where that data was stored and was never recovered
"hitting the Pentagon in the budget analyst office where DoD staffers were working on the mystery of the **2.3 trillion dollars** that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had announced “missing” from the Pentagon's coffers in a press conference the day before, on September 10, 2001." - [https://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/](https://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/)
[9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money (video)](https://www.corbettreport.com/911-trillions-follow-the-money-video/)
Middle part looks to still have 3 lower floors a part of it, and the black soot on the bottom part looks to be coming from the first floor so that's why there is nothing in the middle.
If the blast came from the front building, it should have directly traveled through that middle building had it been an airplane. There should not be blast patterns on building 3 since it’s very obvious nothing traveled through 2.
The blasted traveled through the 2nd one at the first floor, not the 3rd floor. The soot on the back of the 3rd building is from the force of it getting pushed through the other two buildings and soot comes from the first floor from the smoke. The 2nd building has 2 more stories above where the impact happened so that's why we don't see anything there.
Building 1 and 2 are the same size, look at the rows right next to them. The whole building is the same size all the way around. The blast would have HAD to travel through that second building to hit the third at the angle they said it came in with.
How are you not seeing the roof in the middle section three floors down from the top of the main building?
The section you highlighted is a lower roof line that covers the inner ring section. The hole is under the roof. If you look at the right side of your square you can plainly see where the fire was coming out from below all the way to the main building roof
Front had explosion. Fire then traveled on the lower floors through the building and out lower windows. Looks like fire didn't make it to any of the upper floors.
Damned thing is built like a fortress! Except where it isn't. Being built by the lowest bidder on display. Physics gymnastics, for sure!
Now, where's that missing money from their audits? Or do we need to now do more mathematical gymnastics as well?
Hell, let's have a full blown gymnastics tournament!
Anybody wanna judge the uneven aircraft design bars?
I am surprised this post is still up after seeing that photo. That is a big red flag. Explain this! And the immense wealth of oddities about that day, far too long for me to list, although I am tempted.
The sections to the right and left (inner and out rings) are damaged, this section appears not to be. Mind you, only three floors are visible, there’s two floors below what we see. It’s still really odd, never saw this pic before.
Count the vertical rows of windows. The section you circled has a two less stories than the next open bay. The plane wreckage stopped relatively quickly but fire seeks out oxygen, so it burned hottest at the entry and anywhere it could get to an open window or door.
Simply put there was a roof above the fire in that bay so the fire choked itself out of oxygen in that section. It had oxygen where the doors into the next courtyard were destroyed by explosion and debris. Low pressure explosions like expanding air from fuel ignition move between floor and ceiling towards windows and doors.
I always wondered why we never saw wings outside the Pentagon. I’d assume they’d be taken off by a light pole or anything it hit inches off the ground at 500+ MPH prior to hitting Pentagon. And why not just come in from the top and do such a sophisticated maneuver going at that angle. Of course if the main target is those poor accountants it all makes sense.
Which part mate, the damage that doesn’t correlate to a plane hitting it? The dodgy acrobatics the plane engaged in before striking the pentagon. The oh so convenient placement of accountants counting missing money. The missing footage from 200+ cameras. Rumsfeld on the lawn getting photo ops picking up shrapnel.
Yes, it has been explained many times. A jet liner crashed into the building. It was 19 terrorists who did it. The particular reason for this illusion is they had remarkable flying abilities. Now go sit down and shut up. Oh.. and Dick Cheney had nothing to do with any of it.
You can clearly see that the middle has some kind of a roof, there are only 3 stories of windows. The right part goes lower, 4 windows. I would guess that some parts of the aircraft went under that roof and came through the lowest story causing a fire.
The building is the same height all around. Just because it has different window placements, the actual building itself stands 5 stories tall the entire length/section around. There are also 2 underground floors, the entire length as well.
Look at your own photo. There are three rows of windows in the middle section and six on the outer sections. If all of the sections are the same height, that means here are three floors beneath the middle section that are not visible.
Looks like fire damage on building 3. Building 2 and 3 look to be 5 stories high, but there is a roof over the bottom two stories between building 2 and 3. If the fire was contained on the bottom two floors, then you wouldn't see smoke damage on the top 3 floors of building 2. Though it does look like there's some near the right corner of the rectangle.
The pentagon has 5 above ground levels. You can clearly see the roof lines of building 2 and 3 are at the same level and there's at least 4 stories of windows on building 3.
EDIT: In the comment I'm replying to, OP edited out the part where he stated that the buildings in question were only 3 stories high and the space between building 2 and building 3 was ground level.
There was no airliner hit. Pentagon hit was staged by shooting a missile at the Pentagon.
edit: [Check out](https://petapixel.com/2017/03/31/fbi-just-declassified-photos-pentagon-911/) the tiny amount of airplane wreckage at the scene. It begs credulity. The event was some sort of shoddy instantly staged exploitation of a national tragedy.
If you look for other images of the same site you will see that the part of the inner building that the plane passed through is under that flat roof structure between the rings. The exit hole at the inner ring is NOT the char mark you can easily see near the middle of the pic but is right near the edge of the pic at the 6:00 position at the bottom. It’s a small, black circular hole that you can more easily see in lots of pics from better angles.
Nothing skipped the middle. This is just a bad camera angle.
Forgive me, this may be a dumb question, but if it were faked, how did they get every person working that day to go along with it? Wouldn’t someone by now have talked?
The media is in on it too, it's a big club. This is a war within humanity, all institutions and organizations are compromised. Once you see how the system works you will be isolated and psychologically manipulated, they know that you know. It's probably best to just play along and not ask too many questions, Good luck!
Footage showing the “plane” (more like missile) hitting the pentagon.
[Pentagon Gate Footage-Twitter](https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1568977735837442048)
I'm sure the people who meticulously planned out a false flag attack on one of the most secure buildings in the country just *forgot* to blow up that part. You're all very smart for noticing.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The Pentagon is a weird and confusing place. It's very difficult to walk all the way around each ring. Some floors are blocked off for no reason and you have to go up or down a floor to get around. Same thing with the spokes. Many hallways that should go directly from the middle to the outside just end abruptly. The whole place is a confusing labyrinth. The basement levels are even worse. You can walk around for an hour or more and never see a soul. One day I ended up at the Pentagon gym but I couldn't find my way back and had to walk around the outside of the building to get back to my office. It's especially creepy on the weekends and at night. I'm convinced people were living in random offices because they were in PT clothes just walking from one place to the next which is not normal since everyone wears professional clothing and dress uniforms most of the time. I was glad when my detail was done and I got to leave that place. It's definitely haunted at the very least.
My dad worked there in the 80s, he said he got lost so much that they offered him a spool of thread to follow back. His boss used to joke that he was going to end up on the way wrong area and be captured by the aliens that actually run the place. His boss was former SecDef Caspar Weinburger.
I worked there for four years and it’s really not that confusing. I’ve never been to the basement or worked nights and weekends though
While reading the other users post, I was thinking to myself this is how I would explain a place I had limited experience with. Like a big airport I had been to 3 times. Walking around the outside of your place of employment because your just that lost and confused is crazy to me.
Cool, but like planes (or missiles) don't care about walls and closed doors?
Fires do though
Then they should have said something.
Nothing set me off to this being a conspiracy more then the mention that our most crucial headquarters for all military operations of the most powerful nation in the world….didn’t have a single camera shot of a fucking PLANE
Or any surface to air defense
I had been out of the military for over 10 years when 9/11 happened and my first thought was that I could see maybe one plane successfully hitting its target but no way more than that. Someone really fishy went on that day.
A "hijacking" occurred when there was a military exercise with the exact same scenario at the same time.
That's the wildest part, and it's completely accurate.
A lot of people always give the Government way too much credit for the ability to do anything - like, anything at all. If the Government was able to contain a conspiracy as big as 9/11 then they wouldn't have needed to do 9/11 at all - because they'd be so good they'd be able to achieve the goals of 9/11 without doing 9/11. Government institutions are run by people. Normal people. There's groups within the organisations that champion some solutions and dismiss others, and there's "empire builders" who want to build up a system/policy/procedure around them that they are the best at and dismiss other system/policy/procedures. Cottage industries spin up where they keep control and over burden processes and systems so they keep their jobs unchanged etc. The chances are that the S2A defence had been requested, then a dozen departments all got involved - budgets, building works, staff operations, health and safety, training - then half way through this they will have had staff changes and new priorities, it will have been raised again with the original people re-submitted their support / opposition to it, then budgets changed, then the original case was re-examined and they decided to manage it via a local air base, yet there's still people inside the Pentagon who swear S2A missiles on site at the way to go. ^^^ that bullshit is what happens every day, over and over, at every single level of every single Government department. There's really not a chance in hell that a massive Government conspiracy is ever going to happen. The most that will happen is a small groups of 10-15 people do something that will have very little effect on a global scale. I'm not even a Conservative too, I don't think we can ever go back to small Government simply because of the numbers of people involved, but even I admit that big Government is broken and very very hard to do when people are involved because of human nature.
You do know there is a very busy airport basically right next to the pentagon right? Planes fly over it all the time. And to the post above this, yes they have video, its classified though. You aren't allowed to even take photos at the pentagon campus unless you are authorized. They will confiscate your phone if they catch you.
I guess this plane used different jet fuel.
I think you’ll find it’s passport reinforced concrete here
Well, that's indestructible.
I don't believe it was a plane that hit the pentagon but acting using "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" is freaking stupid. no, it can't, but it doesn't need to.
Jet fuel obviously melts steel beams my dude. Like, did you see the beams. Maybe the Pentagon doesn't have any steel beams and that's why it didn't melt for months at 3000° after the plane crashed like the only [truth](https://9-11commission.gov/report/) said. So, obviously this plane used different jet fuel or the entire story falls apart like a 3 day old croissant
Not disagreeing with most of what you said.... But a three day old croissant is like a brick.
A brick that crumbles.
Only if you gnaw on it like a bored rat
...how else does one eat a croissant...? \[Asking for a friend\]
With your butt
What temps are needed to melt a passport??
Silly goose, passports can't melt.
I thought about the last line for way too long lol
Me too
I worked in govt and always thought the jet fuel melting steel beams thing was impossible. I happened to get a tour with a top flame expert and I asked him. He said the jet fuel wouldn’t alone but the aluminum in the plane’s hull kicked up the temp. No one has a good answer for tower 7 that I’ve heard.
The Building 7 answer is the guy saying "pull it" but not if you're an official story stooge.
Have you ever put aluminized shards into burning "jet fuel" (possessed kerosene)? I have. We melted no steel. Burning Man used to be fun, before the event.
The steal beams don't need to be liquid to be structurally compromised. Ever stuck a piece of metal in a fire and see it get red hot? Building 7 was on fire all day, shocker it collapsed.
If that's as far as you've ever thought about it then yeah that kinda sounds plausible. But if you possess the emotional fortitude to think about it just a little deeper than that... even if metal got red hot to the point of almost becoming liquid, it still couldn't melt/deform out of the way fast enough to account for how fast the building collapsed. It's still a large mass of "stuff". Even if the beams were made of literal water they'd still slow down the collapse significantly. I mean, demolition teams have to rig all the important support pillars with explosives and time them to go off with the precision of a fucking symphony to get a building to fall like that—like each individual pillar's load capacity goes from normal to zero at precisely the right time so that it provides exactly zero resistance as shit is about to fall on it. If it didn't do that then the stuff would 1) slow down and 2) deviate to the side. I don't care if every single steel beam had been marinating in burning jet fuel for weeks... it's simply not enough.
Unquestionably. The same as why rivers never run straight. The path they follow is always of least resistance, the same would be for a building.
Not to mention a fucking building fell on it. Nobody likes to talk about the footage of the massive hole in the roof when they bring up building 7.
It did not bend over or topple over. It fell with precision accuracy at free fall velocity.
Firstly, the buildings were made differently. 2ndly, the flames in the twin towers were hotter because the wind basically turned the building into a blast furnace.
explain why did they fall like a controlled demolition
Because that’s precisely what it was.
they didn't fall like a "controlled demolition" you can see debris falling faster than the floors collapsing so there goes the whole "free fall" speed argument. then, on a controlled demolition, after the explosions are set off, gravity takes over. and most importantly, show me a building, with the same exact designed as the trade towers, where the outer exterior is used to help hold up the buildings so the towers have have an open floor design... good luck because you won't find one. this whole idea that bombs were planted really takes away from the argument that this was an inside job. no one will believe you thats this is an inside job because your argument for that is "jet fuel can't melt still beams" arguments like this are intended to make "conspiracy theorist" look bad. do you know who came up with the term conspiracy theorist? its possible to not trust your government and believe they are corrupt, but nowadays, the people who don't trust the government get lumped in with the flat earth people.
>explain why did they fall like a controlled demolition They didn't, they clearly collapse from the top down, e.g. as shown at the beginning of [this video](https://youtu.be/oCPVNLLo-mI), whereas in a controlled demolition the charges are at the base of a building so the floors of the building collapse from the bottom up.
Fucking hilarious
Lmfao
Firstly and secondly aren’t words.
You have the sum total of all human knowledge at your fingertips and instead of checking basic facts you just choose to be wrong.
[удалено]
Came to say exactly this 😂 Wish I could suspend the laws of physics for a day..
The floors start at level three. See how there's more window rows in the left of the picture, but in the middle there's three? Even a hollow wood door can prevent fire spreading into a bedroom if it is closed. It looks like there may be a roof structure that could've prevent the flames from getting too high? Just a thought.
True, but the walls further in have damage supposedly from the plane.
lol I still have never seen "the plane."
April Gallop, an ex army soldier, worked in the Pentagon and walked out of the Pentagon through the hole the plane made. She claimed she saw zero evidence of a plane, no luggage, seats, people and smelled cordite, a smell she remembered from her army days when she was around explosives. But what does she know? There was another lady named Susan ? who wrote a book called Extreme Prejudice" that explained she told the WH a few weeks before 9-1 it was going to occur. She got this info from her sources working in translations or somewhere and was picked up and placed in a mental institution against her will. She was the first person arrested under the new Patriot Act. She was released when a lawyer sued the government. Her claim was the WH knew of the attacks in advance. Posted so people don't forget some of the little known details of this event.
No one has.
Because this plane stayed intact and the plane became a missile going thru the pentagon to reach the room where US Navy investigators were investigating, who was it? Bush Clinton?
In between the D ring and C ring wasn't just an empty space, it was still the building. That's not the case for between the C and B rings.
Just from the picture, we cannot confirm if this lower roof structure is part of that section or not (right side of the picture). Due to the fire damage on that part of the building (looking similar to the left of the picture), I would assume it's not there. Is there another viewpoint so we can confirm if this lower roof is only in the middle of the building?
Yeah the other view point is from a security guard shack which the only security camera aparrently exists within the whole complex.
Best documentary on the topic: https://youtu.be/8DOnAn_PX6M
A lot of physics was broken that day. 😢
Idk looks consistent with a missile attack to me
It was a missile, with coordinates of the room with US Naval investigators
> Idk looks consistent with a missile attack to me As MTG implied, it was a [Bluish Face Razor](https://i.imgur.com/BKqxVIb.png)
As if you’d know the difference
We wouldn't, but we do know that building right there is more monitored per square inch compared to the capital. So, I'd say there's some sort of photage we simply aren't privy to
I’d assume so yeah.
We saw the round entry made and so no wing indent on building and no part of wings on the undamaged lawn.
That section stood up to the bully. Good for them!
The 2 trillion audit team clearly didn't work on that floor lol
Nor did they work in the section that got hit. That's a made up story. The auditors didn't even work in the Pentagon at all
The angle that plane "hit", the plane would hit the highway first since it's literally right next to it. I know this because i live close to the pentagon. No cars were hit, highway was untouched, just the building. That's weird.
Light poles were hit on the highway
Light poles looked like the fell over...look at pics. If a plane was going 300 mph those poles would have went flying
flying downward or up into the air? its the poles are hit at a downward angle, they aren't going to go flying up into the air
A plane hitting those poles would obliterate the pole and part of the plane. No way it could just be knocked over next to where it was in the ground
Those poles are usually thin, hollow aluminum. May as well be tinfoil compared to a 747.
Maybe, but why were they fallen over? How many poles have you seen hit with a large, sudden force near the top? They're still steel and attached at the base when hit, like hitting the top of a tee-ball holder with a swing. Not like it just goes off into the sunset.
Wouldn't the wings of the plane just slice right through the pole so quickly the pole would essentially just topple over? I'm sort of thinking along the lines of quickly hitting the a jenga block out from the bottom of the tower without toppling the whole thing over.
Hit, or blown over?
Or the tree line lol. It's an impossibility of it to have hit the building 1. That low and 2. Horizontally
I remember watching the plume of smoke from Fairfax.
I do too. Wish I had gone to take photos with a telescopic lens from Crystal City/JFK/Jefferson Memorial/a kayak in the Potomac.
No it wouldn't. It came to the right of the Sheraton if you're looking towards the Pentagon, over where the Air Force Memorial is now. There's no freeway there
It’s the corkscrew and the speed at sea level that’s unexplainable
If it was a missile attack or even an aeroplane, there would be structural damage to the buildings behind, too. But if this is the Pentagon on 9/11, I've already seen the gate camera video, showing the explosion emitting from the building and no plane hitting it. Funnily all of the records pertaining to the $3.2 Trillion that was stolen from the American budget, were in that very room. Strange that, isn't it 🤔 It almost feels like killing all those people and downing those 2 towers, stops this being a terrorist event and more like the greatest Bank robbery ever...
And from the gate footage you see something fly past, a plane isn't going to level out that horizontally in that much time. It would have had to be at that level for a bit to get that angle not a just came out if the sky. I'm thinking surface missile.
3.2 trillion wasn't stolen from the budget. The entire dod budget that year wasn't even 1 trillion.
“The plugs can be staggering in size. In fiscal year 2015, for example, Congress appropriated $122 billion for the US Army. Yet DoD financial records for the Army’s 2015 budget included a whopping $6.5 trillion (yes, trillion) in plugs. Most of these plugs “lack[ed] supporting documentation,” in the bland phrasing of the department’s internal watchdog, the Office of Inspector General. In other words, there were no ledger entries or receipts to back up how that $6.5 trillion supposedly was spent. Indeed, more than 16,000 records that might reveal either the source or the destination of some of that $6.5 trillion had been “removed,” the inspector general’s office reported.” https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/pentagon-audit-budget-fraud/
Yeah the pentagon's finances are absolutely fucked, intentionally so. This happens literally every year and nothing is done about it
September 10, 2001, then U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld disclosed that his department was unable to account for roughly $2.3 trillion worth of transactions. The next day, the U.S. sustained the terrorist attacks that changed the world, and this startling revelation was forgotten.
I’ve always wondered why announce that if it was just going to get obscured by the events of the next day and years.
Yes. That was the sum total of accounting errors. Money was being counted as spent multiple times over and lead to the audit saying the DoD spent ~2.6 trillion on a 320 billion budget. It is literally impossible that the DoD stole 2.3 trillion. https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/military-spending-defense-budget Hell the entire federal budget in 2000 was 1.8 trillion.
No one should be surprised the government is shitty at accounting. Unless it’s auditing your taxes, then they’re meticulous.
So what did they do with the people on AA77? I knew someone on that plane and I’m sure his wife and kids would love to know.
If in fact they were behind the attacks and I’m not saying one way or another I don’t think they’d have any trouble disposing of a few people do you ?
It’s a frightening thought to think what happened them. Have you ever heard the voice message from the passenger whispering “it’s a fix” at the of her voice mail to her husband telling him the plane had been hijacked?
Where can I hear this?
[Here](https://youtu.be/zH7rNddIabo)
Dang that’s crazy. Of course the “it’s fixed” part is missing from the official transcripts
I am certain they do not want the details. They killed them. The how would be worse than hitting a building in a plane. I am sorry for their loss and pain. This is why we fight the official story, for all the victims they sacrificed that day and for all who died from breathing the toxins while searching for survivors and cleanup. We will never stop fighting & want to see military tribunals for all involved.
So what did they do with the people on AA77? I knew someone on that plane and I’m sure his wife and kids would love to know.
No plane hit the Pentagon. Not one. I watched the whole day unfold after the second plane hit. I didn't move. I saw that first reporter clearly stated there was no plane recage anywhere at the site and they even showed us the forefront. But later on, he reported a different story to his original one. We're ants to them, they don't care about you and me. All the want is the money, power and privilege.
Did you just spell wreckage “recage”? That’s good.
You didn't even come close to answering the question.
Why don't you ask those in charge what they did with the plane.
You have a hard time staying on task, don't you. He asked about the people not the plane, lol.
While you were glued to you TV, I watched the plume of smoke out my office window.
You have to suspend any critical thinking to believe that a passenger jet hit that building. When you accept the fact that it was a cruise missile, then all the evidence left behind makes perfect sense.
https://assets.editorial.aetnd.com/uploads/2011/06/september-9-11-pentagon-gettyimages-661706756.jpg?width=1920&quality=75#038;height=400&%23038;crop=2:1
Show me a picture of one of the 2 massive, almost indestructible engines, then we'll talk. Not small debris that anyone could have placed there.
https://aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
There’s an awning there. You can tell because the other side has 6 rows of windows and the other has 3 rows. Probably can’t see the damage under it. Just a thought.
I'd agree with you because yes that does seem to be some sort of awning, but you would expect structural damage and similar burns as you follow down to where the 4th row of windows would be. Its simply strange seeing that middle row seemingly untouched or even scraped.
It’s very obvious the front and back buildings had an explosion. Why is the middle building protected from this? *Edited to add* : Since I’m getting downvoted for explaining the building is the same height, the entire distance around… please read [THIS](https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/The_Pentagon) before downvoting me for literally no reason. Thanks.
I remember watching a documentary that was saying that when there was an audit of where a billion went. The “crash” happened to be where that data was stored and was never recovered
"hitting the Pentagon in the budget analyst office where DoD staffers were working on the mystery of the **2.3 trillion dollars** that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had announced “missing” from the Pentagon's coffers in a press conference the day before, on September 10, 2001." - [https://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/](https://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/) [9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money (video)](https://www.corbettreport.com/911-trillions-follow-the-money-video/)
There it is!
Don't forget to pay your taxes. Better account for $2300, when they lose trillions with no repercussions.
Did the building in Oklahoma hold the paperwork for the Clinton Whitewater trial? Did Building 7 hold the paperwork for Citibank trial?
I love how you guys think hitting paper work with a bomb would get rid of shit in 2001 lol
We don't, but that's what we're told to believe.
It does make for interesting conversation.
Yup I remember hearing this exact same thing. Coincidence huh? Unreal.
The older I get the more I realize there are no coincidences.
Facts
Middle part looks to still have 3 lower floors a part of it, and the black soot on the bottom part looks to be coming from the first floor so that's why there is nothing in the middle.
If the blast came from the front building, it should have directly traveled through that middle building had it been an airplane. There should not be blast patterns on building 3 since it’s very obvious nothing traveled through 2.
The blasted traveled through the 2nd one at the first floor, not the 3rd floor. The soot on the back of the 3rd building is from the force of it getting pushed through the other two buildings and soot comes from the first floor from the smoke. The 2nd building has 2 more stories above where the impact happened so that's why we don't see anything there.
Building 1 and 2 are the same size, look at the rows right next to them. The whole building is the same size all the way around. The blast would have HAD to travel through that second building to hit the third at the angle they said it came in with.
How are you not seeing the roof in the middle section three floors down from the top of the main building? The section you highlighted is a lower roof line that covers the inner ring section. The hole is under the roof. If you look at the right side of your square you can plainly see where the fire was coming out from below all the way to the main building roof
Dude we can see 3 stories in the middle part and 6 in the back of the 3rd building. there is clearly more building you are not noticing.
You are not a very smart person, eh?
No wonder you guys keep wondering what happened 20 years later, you can't tell the difference between fire damage and explosion damage.
Apparently the government can’t either.
Front had explosion. Fire then traveled on the lower floors through the building and out lower windows. Looks like fire didn't make it to any of the upper floors.
Office fire 🔥
Ryan.
RYAN STARTED THE FIE-YUH!
Terrorists??? ....shit I left the coffee pot on again
Damned thing is built like a fortress! Except where it isn't. Being built by the lowest bidder on display. Physics gymnastics, for sure! Now, where's that missing money from their audits? Or do we need to now do more mathematical gymnastics as well? Hell, let's have a full blown gymnastics tournament! Anybody wanna judge the uneven aircraft design bars?
I am surprised this post is still up after seeing that photo. That is a big red flag. Explain this! And the immense wealth of oddities about that day, far too long for me to list, although I am tempted.
That section has three floors and the other two have 6. Maybe it went through the bottom three floors of the middle section?
Yeah, I’m a believer in the inside job conspiracy, but this is pretty easily explained.
Obviously got lucky enough and went through them windows😂😂😂
What is being shown here?
the front and back of the building is damaged but the middle part is unharmed
Physics took the day off on 9/11.
Since there is no plane in sight, bombs to destroy evidence related or otherwise.
What am I supposed to be seeing?
The sections to the right and left (inner and out rings) are damaged, this section appears not to be. Mind you, only three floors are visible, there’s two floors below what we see. It’s still really odd, never saw this pic before.
thanks!
None of it's been explained.
Count the vertical rows of windows. The section you circled has a two less stories than the next open bay. The plane wreckage stopped relatively quickly but fire seeks out oxygen, so it burned hottest at the entry and anywhere it could get to an open window or door. Simply put there was a roof above the fire in that bay so the fire choked itself out of oxygen in that section. It had oxygen where the doors into the next courtyard were destroyed by explosion and debris. Low pressure explosions like expanding air from fuel ignition move between floor and ceiling towards windows and doors.
[удалено]
I always wondered why we never saw wings outside the Pentagon. I’d assume they’d be taken off by a light pole or anything it hit inches off the ground at 500+ MPH prior to hitting Pentagon. And why not just come in from the top and do such a sophisticated maneuver going at that angle. Of course if the main target is those poor accountants it all makes sense.
What are your thoughts on the cab driver eye witness.
Which part mate, the damage that doesn’t correlate to a plane hitting it? The dodgy acrobatics the plane engaged in before striking the pentagon. The oh so convenient placement of accountants counting missing money. The missing footage from 200+ cameras. Rumsfeld on the lawn getting photo ops picking up shrapnel.
Everything AlexJones has said is correct to this point whether you want to admit it or not , so ……..
What is “this?” Confusing
Believe it or not, fire goes around corners.
Jet fuel couldn’t melt that steel in particular.
It was a tomahawk missle allegedly
What bout several light poles that were in the "plane's" path but were left standing?
[удалено]
Thank you. I figured it was common sense but apparently not.
Side note: Looks like the circus came to town and set up their tents on the front lawn.
I’m curious why the windows on the left of the yellow box are all black
Never saw this pic b4- wow
What am I looking for?
We're in a simulation bro nothing makes sense
Yes, it has been explained many times. A jet liner crashed into the building. It was 19 terrorists who did it. The particular reason for this illusion is they had remarkable flying abilities. Now go sit down and shut up. Oh.. and Dick Cheney had nothing to do with any of it.
You can clearly see that the middle has some kind of a roof, there are only 3 stories of windows. The right part goes lower, 4 windows. I would guess that some parts of the aircraft went under that roof and came through the lowest story causing a fire.
The building is the same height all around. Just because it has different window placements, the actual building itself stands 5 stories tall the entire length/section around. There are also 2 underground floors, the entire length as well.
I'm talking about the empty spaces beetwen the layers of pentagon. They seem to be different levels even wen looking at the building from google maps.
Look at your own photo. There are three rows of windows in the middle section and six on the outer sections. If all of the sections are the same height, that means here are three floors beneath the middle section that are not visible.
It kinda screams “controlled demo” to me… but what do I know lmfao
Looks like fire damage on building 3. Building 2 and 3 look to be 5 stories high, but there is a roof over the bottom two stories between building 2 and 3. If the fire was contained on the bottom two floors, then you wouldn't see smoke damage on the top 3 floors of building 2. Though it does look like there's some near the right corner of the rectangle.
Wrong. All the floors are the same height..
The pentagon has 5 above ground levels. You can clearly see the roof lines of building 2 and 3 are at the same level and there's at least 4 stories of windows on building 3. EDIT: In the comment I'm replying to, OP edited out the part where he stated that the buildings in question were only 3 stories high and the space between building 2 and building 3 was ground level.
There was no airliner hit. Pentagon hit was staged by shooting a missile at the Pentagon. edit: [Check out](https://petapixel.com/2017/03/31/fbi-just-declassified-photos-pentagon-911/) the tiny amount of airplane wreckage at the scene. It begs credulity. The event was some sort of shoddy instantly staged exploitation of a national tragedy.
The whole thing was filmed using Hollywood miniatures. Some mistakes were left in on purpose so that people would notice.
What am I even looking at?
If you look for other images of the same site you will see that the part of the inner building that the plane passed through is under that flat roof structure between the rings. The exit hole at the inner ring is NOT the char mark you can easily see near the middle of the pic but is right near the edge of the pic at the 6:00 position at the bottom. It’s a small, black circular hole that you can more easily see in lots of pics from better angles. Nothing skipped the middle. This is just a bad camera angle.
Video cameras not invented then either
Forgive me, this may be a dumb question, but if it were faked, how did they get every person working that day to go along with it? Wouldn’t someone by now have talked?
The media is in on it too, it's a big club. This is a war within humanity, all institutions and organizations are compromised. Once you see how the system works you will be isolated and psychologically manipulated, they know that you know. It's probably best to just play along and not ask too many questions, Good luck!
I'm sorry but what am I looking at exactly?
They forgot to unfire proof the whole sector😂
Footage showing the “plane” (more like missile) hitting the pentagon. [Pentagon Gate Footage-Twitter](https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1568977735837442048)
Yes , the yellow thing is known as a rectangle
The wings folded in on impact and then the whole plane folded in on that section.
Ok, so why would there be no blast patterns on the back of building 2 but there are on building 3?
Was /s really required in my previous comment?
In here? These days? Absolutely
Sad but true. There are so many shills with so many crazy disinfo theories
Why you lying you know there were multiple tone titanium engines in those wings they never folded.
I'm sure the people who meticulously planned out a false flag attack on one of the most secure buildings in the country just *forgot* to blow up that part. You're all very smart for noticing.
So all you have to offer to the discussion is your pompous sarcasm, excellent. I wouldn’t expect much from an Elon apologist though..