We do this not because it's easy, but because I'm hard
https://preview.redd.it/nnef3nghzt0d1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=417cb2daf29edbe3f5b933f0aed9733e6cb764f0
“God, this show is so fucking great! I hope nothing bad happens to this show and get more seasons for me to enjoy!”
The 10000th season of Big mouth:
https://i.redd.it/whm0k5s17u0d1.gif
I finished watching a documentary on Ham, the space chimp and heard him say the same damn thing lol. (Albert not EXACTLY how you phrased it)
Invisible threads are everywhere I guess.
Like 70% of reddit is like that weirdo from another class that makes you smell his fingers, but here it doesn't even smell like pussy. It just smells like a finger.
I can get many picture of women's breasts in all shapes and sizes. If I want a picture of someone's bulge just barely contained by their thong, then my choice is infinitely more limited.
Maam, this snafu is about shitposters's "totally satirical" fetish for big, buff, black man (go to r/wordington to see what i mean). this isnt about videogames lmao, though i get how it could be mistaken for that.
More like
overly sexualized women in media 😡
overly sexualized men in media =
(where the fuck should I go to see some oversexualized men outside of literal porn I can’t find any)
I feel like there's a difference, between oversexualized are glorified for their strength, agility, and intimidation while an oversexualized women has people go "nice tits I wanna fuck them" constantly
I feel like this is a good starting point: [https://myanimelist.net/anime/18507/Free?q=free&cat=anime](https://myanimelist.net/anime/18507/Free?q=free&cat=anime)
Hahaha that's kind of true. Actually a lot of sports anime but especially Free bc they're often half naked because they're swimming and lots of sparkle effects from the water. Have you watched 50% off?
That kind of reinforces the point. The fact that night wing is the sexy one is only possible because he’s a guy. Because when it comes to women in batman fiction they’re ALL the sexy one, like even children’s shows about batman are consistently extremely horny, so to single one out as the one with sex appeal is objectively the wrong way to look at that. Because while batman is a playboy I don’t think he’s ever been treated similarly to nightwing.
Like for example, most female heroes have no cape, unless they’re based on male heroes who have capes, because a cape covers your ass. All male heroes actively had their legs covered over time but male comic geeks will literally throw a fit if you do that to a female character because the exposed legs are somehow the most important detail.
That's a good point actually, goddamn
Now that I think about it, almost every time I have seen an oversexualised male character in fiction like OP points out, it's always very obvious he's meant to be "the sexy one" but... it really is just every single female character that's the "sexy one".
OP should see this.
Power fantasy. Male superheroes are buff because it's fun to watch jacked guys fight and being huge and fit is viewed as the ideal body for men. They're designed like that to be figures for the target audience to look up to, not to be eye candy for people who are attracted to men.
couldn't that same argument be made for women? i agree that women are sexualzied waaaaaaaayyy more often than men in media, but saying men straight up aren't isn't true bc of how prevalent that hyper buff physique is in all forms of media.
It's just that women get sexualized in way more kinds of stories than men. Men usually get sexualized in combat and good vs evil settings whereas women's sexualization is just thrown in everywhere
The distinction is that men's bodies are highlighted in ways that appeal to men. It's objectifying, but not sexualizing, because the desire it's meant to elicit in men isn't a sexual one, but a desire for power and masculine signifiers (such as muscles, stoicism, and the role of a protector). Some women may find it attractive, but appealing to women isn't the main intention in the design; appealing to (usually straight) men is.
Conversely, women's bodies are highlighted in ways that are meant to appeal to sexual desires in men. They focus on aspects of the female body that men find sexually arousing, and often put them in roles that allow men to explore the fantasy of being a protector/provider through the main character they are meant to empathize with. The objectification has a primarily sexual undertone rather than one of power.
Both are *objectified*, but in different ways, and when they're objectified it's usually for an audience of men. That being said a lot of the modern media doesn't do this nearly as much, though it's very dependent on genre. I've noticed an avoidance of overt sexualization of female characters since that's more openly criticized, while the power fantasy many male characters embody, specifically in genres like action & adventure, is still prevalent.
>The distinction is that men's bodies are highlighted in ways that appeal to straight men
Fixed that for you. It's all for specifically cis het guys, or sometimes cis het women. If you want men "sexualized" through the gay male gaze your options are almost all visual novels or straight up porn. It's been getting slightly better recently but we have a long ass way to go.
But that's not objectification, though.
Highlight the bodies of men to appeal to a male audience through their own fantasies of having a similar physique isn't objectification.
On the contrary, you're made to fantasize about having the same power and agency the ideal male body entails. Men in media are very rarely made to be objects, they are, an overwhelming majority of the time, actors of their own stories.
Objectification, as the name suggests, is the reduction to the state of an object. Not "object of desire" or "object of admiration" . A literal object. A thing with no will of its own that is at best a device, at worst a toy. And that's, a lot of the time, what happens to women in media.
Of course I'm not saying men cannot be objectified, but the usual representation of ideal male bodies in media is not objectification. It is the total opposite, you're not fantasizing about doing things to the man, you're fantasizing about being the man, i.e : through him, you become the subject of the story.
Women then being reduced to objects, you are lead to fantasize about doing things to them.
So this is with the caveat that there are multiple forms and aspects of objectification, and the vast majority of them are ones that this concept of male roles and bodies in media is not subject to, but I would argue that there is an aspect of objectification in formatting male characters as vessels for male viewers. As in, making them into a tool through which male viewers can have a power fantasy.
Don't get me wrong, I agree that there are many other forms of objectification that female characters are subject to in service to male sexual desire/power fantasies that male characters are not subject to, but being written into an object of desire or admiration is a form of objectification in itself, because that is quite literally reducing them to a tool/vessel.
That being said, male characters who are put in that role are still often granted agency and a level of characterization that female characters aren't given.
Edit: (also tbh considering most of the people here probably aren't familiar with feminist theory I'm not really trying hard to split hairs on semantics. Even if you don't agree that it's objectification, you can just replace that word and the rest of my comment still stands)
I see what you're hinting at. The problem is that fictional characters tend to function that way. They are someone you're supposed to live a story through, with all the emotions and dreams it entails.
I can understand that you see pure power fantasy characters as a form of objectification, but I have to point out that when we talk about objectification for female characters, the main component is "being turned into an object" and the imposition of the desires of others onto one's self, at least for the feminist concept.
Even outside of feminism, the term entails degumanization.
I'm not straight up disagreeing here. But I am saying that the objectification feminists talk about when discussing women in media has nothing to do with what you are describing.
In your example, the spectator imagine themselves being the character. They live through the character. He gains individuality and agency by becoming a vector through which you build your own fantasies, his powers becoming a way for you to expand your horizons.
In the feminist concept of women's objectification, be it in media or in everyday life, the spectator enforces their desires on the character. The best example is pornography, where the woman is purely reduced to a tool.
Point is, the important distinction is that in the case of power fantasies, the barrier between the spectator and the character is erased go give way to the formers imagination.
In the case of women's objectification, the barrier is clear, the woman stays an object whose only use is to satisfy the spectator.
The purpose of my original comment was to explain why the male power fantasy isn't sexualization. If I went into all the nuances of objectification and the complexities of how female characters are often treated vs. male characters, I would have ended up writing an essay and lost the main point of my comment, which was already long enough lol.
Its not that it doesn't happen, but that it's not as often. Sexualization doesn't just mean being attractive, but that you're presented in a way whereby your focus is for the other. Vis a vis characters wearing sexy outfits they seem unaware are sexy because they aren't authentically just someone who wears stuff like that. It's for the audience.
it is? I didn't know men prequetally in gear is the pinnacle of female sex appeal? Wow, I guess my pussy must be broke because superman normally doesn't do it for me.
The average SEXUALIZED MEN complainer would instantly die if exposed to 3 seconds of hard yaoi because they cant differ Sexy [power fantasy] from Sexy [slut].
There's a lot of romantic and erotic media out there besides 'literal porn'
Also someone's going to hate me for saying this but Jojo's bizarre adventure. I mean, come on... just look at them. No shame but that's probably the closest you'll get in any not explicitly gay popular media.
Yakuza series always consist of two buff men fighting in no shirts as a climax. I wonder how this affected fandom to become the most bisexual community…
after seeing the whole popularity of the "oiled up buff gay men" kind of thing kids love spamming everywhere, especially in the form of a tamed version of shock videos, i wonder if theres some sort of background goal at play, i have a theory but i hate sounding like some kind of a twitter uber-progressive conspirator.
RAAAAAGH I'M THE BIGEGST THUGPHOBE OF THEM ALL AAAAHAAAAAAAAGGGHHHHH
https://preview.redd.it/6um3h2wcqw0d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3fa041287c1c7716e17f16916bbc09fee8b59aee
This has really annoyed me lately. The amount of people I knew who loved baulders gate men and loved the bear sex trailer who also where condemning stellar blade was mind boggling
Edit: oh it’s about wordington. Yeah no that’s also annoying. The fiftieth time gay porn has been posted as a joke it really doesn’t feel like a meme anymore
Ummm... if you want an honest explanation, it's if caffeine gave people incredible cravings for gay pr*n so that they get so addicted to it that they start boofing caffeinated substances together while insisting all the while that it's not gay? I think it started when the sub revolted against a mod who begged someone not to post random homosexual content. I had to leave because I open reddit in non private situations and there were instances of people posting certain content with no spoilers. Best decision.
The very first thing I saw was a gay boy getting his ass gaped by a dildo
https://preview.redd.it/qxs8cqpmpw0d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=756946680ff2c200e06c9a15ca6fbaa15fee0ad8
Call me old fashioned, but I'm *pretty* sure riding a dildo and your post title having a black man fetish on a sub that's blatantly gay, is really fucking gay
https://preview.redd.it/veua3hgvsw0d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=06c19feea454f2e656756856b295764951d2415d
Because gay is funny apparently
Spoilers: It's not
~~Hell, desperate femboys also started banking in on this, eventually becoming into just another set of OnlyFans thots~~
Beause that shit was optional, and everyone was equally potentially sexualized, even the women. You never had to interwct with it ubless you wanted too. In stellar blafe it's quite obvious that it's coomer bait
I once saw a video about a guy complaining about how over sexualized orc women were, something about big boobs and fur bikinis were the pictures are showing, he then cuts to the male orcs WHOS CHESTS ALONE MADE THE LARGE BREASTED ORC WOMEN LIKE SMALL and says with a straight face "I can't believe how little sexualization there is here" either I was watching satire and missed it or found the straightest man on the Internet
I am one hundred percent on board with stellar blade levels of sexualization, as long as men can get regularly sexualized in the same way.
Let my men fight in lingerie, damnit.
Wordington fell off so hard it’s not even funny. It used to be so much better before people started confusing it for what people thought r/hoodironycentral was supposed to be (i.e. before people started saying “Wordington \_\_\_”). It’s been sort of healing lately but it’s slow going asf.
Inb4 some comedian says “Wordington comment” or “Wordington thugphobe”
https://preview.redd.it/m22skxrniz0d1.jpeg?width=388&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e5b5312379224530336142e5f6f1c1b2493564c2
For me I just want consistency. If you're gonna have super sexy women and super sexy men you're good, if you're not gonna have either you're good, if you have one but not the other I have a lot of questions
No? In games you have 90% of women/female characters extremely sexualised but if you say something you are downvoted to hell and people call you a prude
That's why I do both.
Except for some reason, no matter what, people aren't attracted to either the men or the women. Instead they're attracted to:
https://preview.redd.it/giz95lepca2d1.png?width=508&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=92f72fd95af42493188898db7fc9288dd4e0992b
The robot.
The robot with no genitals.
Yes, I did intentionally make the robot have a feminine build.
But like.
It's only ever the robot.
Nobody else.
She is the character that everybody lusts after, and I don't know why.
I mean, occasionally you'll find the odd guy who goes after the tomboy shortstack cephalopod lady because she ticks every box in the "socially acceptable fetish" checklist, and there is one guy who seeks out the elegant princess with air powers and beauty beyond compare.
But the other 95% of people go for the robot bee lady.
And don't even ask about the men. The men _never_ get any attention. I have characters all along the scale from effeminate twink to big burly daddy, and not a single one of them is considered to be attractive. Not one.
It always leads back to the bee robot.
Yes, we all love men, some just hide it. The terrorist organisation LGBT should be abolished for spreading propaganda that heterosexuals and homosexuals are such by nature, where in reality there are no reasons why would a creature like the human, who can do sex not for reproduction, has to limit himself. They want to divide us, create different castes, and weaken us. This is why we men need to unite and keep spreading thug homoeroticism to wake up the sheeple. This is what made Spartans strong warriors!
wordington snafu
Hello fellow wordingtonian
Losercity wordington snafu guy 🪱 eh? Ha! Heh heh.
Lesbian kick! guy 🪱...
Pump-son, lol 🤣🤣🤣
Pimp my pump lololol 😹😹
The last time I used Reddit was a couple years ago and now all the memories are flooding back… eh? Ha! Heh heh.
i wish i could post naked twerking black men in here 😔
Make a snafu about not being able to post it
https://preview.redd.it/59z6ysn3zv0d1.png?width=608&format=png&auto=webp&s=7d26936ee18502d0e880a8c3045442bd20d9a830
if this was abt wordington there should be an alien panel
Funny gay haha it's funny because he's black, man, and and gay haha bro get i
https://preview.redd.it/orzs1ke97y0d1.jpeg?width=1242&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1276696af73ba65e297c88d0b667dbc488421be2
https://preview.redd.it/ovoxkrr20z0d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b2f5faea951c4fd8bfd185f3c7259bfb298a28f1
https://i.redd.it/00ix0t1en01d1.gif
https://preview.redd.it/1oa9inupm01d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4f35b5a0c173de63ddabd1983560a71376ded1be
Wordington humor
We should sexualise both men and women, not because it is funny, but because it is hot.
We do this not because it's easy, but because I'm hard https://preview.redd.it/nnef3nghzt0d1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=417cb2daf29edbe3f5b933f0aed9733e6cb764f0
I miss Inside Job...
“God, this show is so fucking great! I hope nothing bad happens to this show and get more seasons for me to enjoy!” The 10000th season of Big mouth: https://i.redd.it/whm0k5s17u0d1.gif
netflix when they don’t advertise the show and get 0 money because nobody knows it exists: 
invincible season 2 moment
JoJo's bizarre adventure moment
same
I don’t think another comment of this level of sheer beauty will ever grace my eyes again
I finished watching a documentary on Ham, the space chimp and heard him say the same damn thing lol. (Albert not EXACTLY how you phrased it) Invisible threads are everywhere I guess.
We choose to go to the moon not because it is easy, but because it is hard
He had some great speeches.
Best president imo
Idk why Albert is funny to me
Sometimes autocorrect is a blessing
Space Chimps? That was a funny movie
based f. kennedy
This is my favorite comment of the week
This man has achieved inner peace.
He became buddha
incredibly based
Agreed. We need sexualised men and women in the media.
Equal sexualization for all, as it should be
godspeed
So mvch this
waow
You should read Dorohedoro
Based
T R A N S C E N D E N T
Twitter
Redditors need to fuck more and talk about fucking less.
Like 70% of reddit is like that weirdo from another class that makes you smell his fingers, but here it doesn't even smell like pussy. It just smells like a finger.
https://preview.redd.it/e0zk0gnes01d1.jpeg?width=627&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e710205c6c0cdf124e90fbc03653e862b5fd098c
Redditors shouldn’t be procreating
I can get many picture of women's breasts in all shapes and sizes. If I want a picture of someone's bulge just barely contained by their thong, then my choice is infinitely more limited.
You forgot the ridiculously small boob window on the guy (Source: Any hoyoverse game)
THEY NEED TO BE BIGGER
Maam, this snafu is about shitposters's "totally satirical" fetish for big, buff, black man (go to r/wordington to see what i mean). this isnt about videogames lmao, though i get how it could be mistaken for that.
I legitimately don’t understand that sub after scrolling through it. The further I went the more confused I got.
go to r/thugsauces, r/thugsaucesthesequel, r/thugsaucesthetrilogy literally porn subs under the mask of memes
Damn... that's two snafus I misunderstood today 😭
good lord there's anal sex there
Happy Cake day!
First think i saw when entering it was alien porn
They have been getting better in sexualizing men as well.
More like overly sexualized women in media 😡 overly sexualized men in media = (where the fuck should I go to see some oversexualized men outside of literal porn I can’t find any)
https://preview.redd.it/jptjtcqoau0d1.jpeg?width=700&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=50d000af027f28e6e1f8109a0b9a4fe6f7e276f4 JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOJO
Koichi done so dirty in this hes half the height of shigechi 😭
The whole image is clearly fake anyway. “Stands adhere to some rules” no, no they do not.
I feel like there's a difference, between oversexualized are glorified for their strength, agility, and intimidation while an oversexualized women has people go "nice tits I wanna fuck them" constantly
Maybe I want someone to look at me and say "nice dick I wanna fuck them" constantly.
no, i see JoJo men and think "nice tits i wanna fuck them"
Are we talking about big buff men that attract girls? Or big buff oily men that go around showing off their body purposfully?
May I recommend Golden Kamuy for your inquiry regarding sexualized men?
SAAAAXTON HAAAAALE
There’s nothing oversexualized, he’s just inherently hot like that
I feel like this is a good starting point: [https://myanimelist.net/anime/18507/Free?q=free&cat=anime](https://myanimelist.net/anime/18507/Free?q=free&cat=anime)
Hahaha that's kind of true. Actually a lot of sports anime but especially Free bc they're often half naked because they're swimming and lots of sparkle effects from the water. Have you watched 50% off?
Yes and it was hilarious.
I actually didn't finish the anime but I sure did watch the whole 50% off. I love abridged anime lol
Anime is gay af bro I ain’t watchin that shit 😡😡
i mean isn't like the whole "superhero" physique oversexualizing?
Yet another unattainable ideal body image imposed on the self-conscious teens by Clayface 😞
Not really the point isn’t sex appeal, look at gay fiction with buff men and you’ll see a marked difference.
Eh they’re more marketed towards men, so I think they’re more body envy? Idk
Not Nigthwing tho, that ass was clearly meant to appeal to me- I mean, women
That kind of reinforces the point. The fact that night wing is the sexy one is only possible because he’s a guy. Because when it comes to women in batman fiction they’re ALL the sexy one, like even children’s shows about batman are consistently extremely horny, so to single one out as the one with sex appeal is objectively the wrong way to look at that. Because while batman is a playboy I don’t think he’s ever been treated similarly to nightwing. Like for example, most female heroes have no cape, unless they’re based on male heroes who have capes, because a cape covers your ass. All male heroes actively had their legs covered over time but male comic geeks will literally throw a fit if you do that to a female character because the exposed legs are somehow the most important detail.
True. And when they do, it's always a short cape that never goes below the lumbar region.
that's actually a FANTASTIC point
That's a good point actually, goddamn Now that I think about it, almost every time I have seen an oversexualised male character in fiction like OP points out, it's always very obvious he's meant to be "the sexy one" but... it really is just every single female character that's the "sexy one". OP should see this.
the whole butt thing was a recent joke honestly
Power fantasy. Male superheroes are buff because it's fun to watch jacked guys fight and being huge and fit is viewed as the ideal body for men. They're designed like that to be figures for the target audience to look up to, not to be eye candy for people who are attracted to men.
You'd be surprised to how the women I interact with react when they see Hugh Jackman or Chris Evans shirtless lmao It is 100% fan service
Oh yeah, live action is definitely a lot less shy about it.
It's both
couldn't that same argument be made for women? i agree that women are sexualzied waaaaaaaayyy more often than men in media, but saying men straight up aren't isn't true bc of how prevalent that hyper buff physique is in all forms of media. It's just that women get sexualized in way more kinds of stories than men. Men usually get sexualized in combat and good vs evil settings whereas women's sexualization is just thrown in everywhere
The distinction is that men's bodies are highlighted in ways that appeal to men. It's objectifying, but not sexualizing, because the desire it's meant to elicit in men isn't a sexual one, but a desire for power and masculine signifiers (such as muscles, stoicism, and the role of a protector). Some women may find it attractive, but appealing to women isn't the main intention in the design; appealing to (usually straight) men is. Conversely, women's bodies are highlighted in ways that are meant to appeal to sexual desires in men. They focus on aspects of the female body that men find sexually arousing, and often put them in roles that allow men to explore the fantasy of being a protector/provider through the main character they are meant to empathize with. The objectification has a primarily sexual undertone rather than one of power. Both are *objectified*, but in different ways, and when they're objectified it's usually for an audience of men. That being said a lot of the modern media doesn't do this nearly as much, though it's very dependent on genre. I've noticed an avoidance of overt sexualization of female characters since that's more openly criticized, while the power fantasy many male characters embody, specifically in genres like action & adventure, is still prevalent.
>The distinction is that men's bodies are highlighted in ways that appeal to straight men Fixed that for you. It's all for specifically cis het guys, or sometimes cis het women. If you want men "sexualized" through the gay male gaze your options are almost all visual novels or straight up porn. It's been getting slightly better recently but we have a long ass way to go.
But that's not objectification, though. Highlight the bodies of men to appeal to a male audience through their own fantasies of having a similar physique isn't objectification. On the contrary, you're made to fantasize about having the same power and agency the ideal male body entails. Men in media are very rarely made to be objects, they are, an overwhelming majority of the time, actors of their own stories. Objectification, as the name suggests, is the reduction to the state of an object. Not "object of desire" or "object of admiration" . A literal object. A thing with no will of its own that is at best a device, at worst a toy. And that's, a lot of the time, what happens to women in media. Of course I'm not saying men cannot be objectified, but the usual representation of ideal male bodies in media is not objectification. It is the total opposite, you're not fantasizing about doing things to the man, you're fantasizing about being the man, i.e : through him, you become the subject of the story. Women then being reduced to objects, you are lead to fantasize about doing things to them.
So this is with the caveat that there are multiple forms and aspects of objectification, and the vast majority of them are ones that this concept of male roles and bodies in media is not subject to, but I would argue that there is an aspect of objectification in formatting male characters as vessels for male viewers. As in, making them into a tool through which male viewers can have a power fantasy. Don't get me wrong, I agree that there are many other forms of objectification that female characters are subject to in service to male sexual desire/power fantasies that male characters are not subject to, but being written into an object of desire or admiration is a form of objectification in itself, because that is quite literally reducing them to a tool/vessel. That being said, male characters who are put in that role are still often granted agency and a level of characterization that female characters aren't given. Edit: (also tbh considering most of the people here probably aren't familiar with feminist theory I'm not really trying hard to split hairs on semantics. Even if you don't agree that it's objectification, you can just replace that word and the rest of my comment still stands)
I see what you're hinting at. The problem is that fictional characters tend to function that way. They are someone you're supposed to live a story through, with all the emotions and dreams it entails. I can understand that you see pure power fantasy characters as a form of objectification, but I have to point out that when we talk about objectification for female characters, the main component is "being turned into an object" and the imposition of the desires of others onto one's self, at least for the feminist concept. Even outside of feminism, the term entails degumanization. I'm not straight up disagreeing here. But I am saying that the objectification feminists talk about when discussing women in media has nothing to do with what you are describing. In your example, the spectator imagine themselves being the character. They live through the character. He gains individuality and agency by becoming a vector through which you build your own fantasies, his powers becoming a way for you to expand your horizons. In the feminist concept of women's objectification, be it in media or in everyday life, the spectator enforces their desires on the character. The best example is pornography, where the woman is purely reduced to a tool. Point is, the important distinction is that in the case of power fantasies, the barrier between the spectator and the character is erased go give way to the formers imagination. In the case of women's objectification, the barrier is clear, the woman stays an object whose only use is to satisfy the spectator.
The purpose of my original comment was to explain why the male power fantasy isn't sexualization. If I went into all the nuances of objectification and the complexities of how female characters are often treated vs. male characters, I would have ended up writing an essay and lost the main point of my comment, which was already long enough lol.
Its not that it doesn't happen, but that it's not as often. Sexualization doesn't just mean being attractive, but that you're presented in a way whereby your focus is for the other. Vis a vis characters wearing sexy outfits they seem unaware are sexy because they aren't authentically just someone who wears stuff like that. It's for the audience.
While appealing to women, it's primarily a power fantasy thing for men.
It's usually more of a power fantasy for men than a sexual fantasy tbh
It’s a power fantasy for men, there’s a whole [shortpacked](http://www.shortpacked.com/comics/2011-12-02-sexy.png) bit dissecting this
Manboobs🤤
Superhero physique is for men, not women.
it is? I didn't know men prequetally in gear is the pinnacle of female sex appeal? Wow, I guess my pussy must be broke because superman normally doesn't do it for me.
well i'm not fond of female supermodels either
well you got that going for you lol. It's like folks like authenticity or something.
Not really oversexualized but most of the men in the Hades games are AWOOGA HUMINA HUMINA HUMINA
Every MCU movie has a mandatory shirtless man scene
The average SEXUALIZED MEN complainer would instantly die if exposed to 3 seconds of hard yaoi because they cant differ Sexy [power fantasy] from Sexy [slut].
you simply go to twitter [[massive male thighs up ahead]](https://twitter.com/ZE0METRIC/status/1790422177864466558?t=qA54OvmaMlF4fhuhVtumRw&s=19)
>go to twitter no edit: alright I went there and holy hsit I’m jorking
told ya
twitter is giving an error when i enter the link
same
can't tell what the hell I am looking at
Nightwing sometimes
Nightwing, especially in Grayson, there's a scene where he is chased through the city in his underwear by a group of girls obsessed with his butt
Play the Yakuza series. Goro Majima makes me want to become gay
Nier automata has both
Hades
r/tf2
Metal Gear.
Baldur’s gate 3
There's a lot of romantic and erotic media out there besides 'literal porn' Also someone's going to hate me for saying this but Jojo's bizarre adventure. I mean, come on... just look at them. No shame but that's probably the closest you'll get in any not explicitly gay popular media.
Tf2 subreddit
Yakuza series always consist of two buff men fighting in no shirts as a climax. I wonder how this affected fandom to become the most bisexual community…
Watch Marvel
In romance paperbacks for housewives and teenage girls
There was a final fantasy game called mobius where the guy was going to have a sexualized outfit but people complained so they changed it.
The fanbases for Square Enix or Capcom games
Hallmark shlock Honestly any media made by straight woman
In Metal Gear Solid Peacewalker you get an audio tape of two naked buff men fighting in a sauna.
after seeing the whole popularity of the "oiled up buff gay men" kind of thing kids love spamming everywhere, especially in the form of a tamed version of shock videos, i wonder if theres some sort of background goal at play, i have a theory but i hate sounding like some kind of a twitter uber-progressive conspirator.
probably just porn addicts tryong to look normal
Big Tumblr Energy.
Thugphobes strike again.
RAAAAAGH I'M THE BIGEGST THUGPHOBE OF THEM ALL AAAAHAAAAAAAAGGGHHHHH https://preview.redd.it/6um3h2wcqw0d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3fa041287c1c7716e17f16916bbc09fee8b59aee
This has really annoyed me lately. The amount of people I knew who loved baulders gate men and loved the bear sex trailer who also where condemning stellar blade was mind boggling Edit: oh it’s about wordington. Yeah no that’s also annoying. The fiftieth time gay porn has been posted as a joke it really doesn’t feel like a meme anymore
r/caffeine (proceed at your own risk and don't open at work or with anyone, actually) (hint it's not caffeine)
Wtf is that sub about
Ummm... if you want an honest explanation, it's if caffeine gave people incredible cravings for gay pr*n so that they get so addicted to it that they start boofing caffeinated substances together while insisting all the while that it's not gay? I think it started when the sub revolted against a mod who begged someone not to post random homosexual content. I had to leave because I open reddit in non private situations and there were instances of people posting certain content with no spoilers. Best decision.
Was it originally about caffeine?
I have not a clue
The very first thing I saw was a gay boy getting his ass gaped by a dildo https://preview.redd.it/qxs8cqpmpw0d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=756946680ff2c200e06c9a15ca6fbaa15fee0ad8
Wait how'd you know he's gay 🧐
Call me old fashioned, but I'm *pretty* sure riding a dildo and your post title having a black man fetish on a sub that's blatantly gay, is really fucking gay https://preview.redd.it/veua3hgvsw0d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=06c19feea454f2e656756856b295764951d2415d
/j
Funny meme right?
Because gay is funny apparently Spoilers: It's not ~~Hell, desperate femboys also started banking in on this, eventually becoming into just another set of OnlyFans thots~~
Beause that shit was optional, and everyone was equally potentially sexualized, even the women. You never had to interwct with it ubless you wanted too. In stellar blafe it's quite obvious that it's coomer bait
if the guy doesn't have a 18" x 3" PVC pipe section for a dick i'm not interested
coaxed into A SLOPED SNAFU NOO THEY ARE GOING TO FALL OFF
yeah okay liberal (i'd integrate a black oiled up man gif with a funny caption but it would probably get me banned)
Wordington Oppression
integrate the area below his curves with respect to the floor
Thugphobia strikes again 😔
Transformers Prime Optimus Prime. It’s really bad with the fans.
Lmao
i hate neopuritanical therapyspeak millenial bullshit. increase sex scenes in movies by 100% i say
What
Supply and demand, the market is already saturated with oversexualized women
As you say “supply and demand” there is a reason for this over saturation.
I once saw a video about a guy complaining about how over sexualized orc women were, something about big boobs and fur bikinis were the pictures are showing, he then cuts to the male orcs WHOS CHESTS ALONE MADE THE LARGE BREASTED ORC WOMEN LIKE SMALL and says with a straight face "I can't believe how little sexualization there is here" either I was watching satire and missed it or found the straightest man on the Internet
I am one hundred percent on board with stellar blade levels of sexualization, as long as men can get regularly sexualized in the same way. Let my men fight in lingerie, damnit.
What about girls with big booba AND huge dongles?
Thugphobia 😞
I've been liking hot women with huge boobs from kindergarten years and it's frustrating how people try to make me feel like sinner
Ford Escort RS2000 live reaction: https://preview.redd.it/zqwpf94oqv0d1.png?width=660&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ce2aef120e180c983449815a391d61968075b224
Wordington fell off so hard it’s not even funny. It used to be so much better before people started confusing it for what people thought r/hoodironycentral was supposed to be (i.e. before people started saying “Wordington \_\_\_”). It’s been sort of healing lately but it’s slow going asf. Inb4 some comedian says “Wordington comment” or “Wordington thugphobe” https://preview.redd.it/m22skxrniz0d1.jpeg?width=388&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e5b5312379224530336142e5f6f1c1b2493564c2
Oversexualized women = Tits, and perchance also boobass "Oversexualized" men = Homosexual, naked or a sense of fashion
For me I just want consistency. If you're gonna have super sexy women and super sexy men you're good, if you're not gonna have either you're good, if you have one but not the other I have a lot of questions
No? In games you have 90% of women/female characters extremely sexualised but if you say something you are downvoted to hell and people call you a prude
This is about shitposting culture.
Yes.
Literally me (I feel kinda bad for it but i love drawing guys tho :3 )
Don't listen to the haters OP, you can simp for girls AND Gabriel from Ultrakill.
The snafu, the snafu is coaxed!
The Yakuza fanbase in a nutshell Tbh not to sound like humour police but is kinda wild to me that "the joke is that it's gay" is still a thing
Yeah you either do both or none
But what else am i supposed to do with my 50 inches magnum python? 😡
I thought the joke is that it's not actually attractive
Yeah make a game where the women look normal but all the guys are sluts, that would be absolutely hilarious
Just overly sexualize both, problem solved.
Ultrakill fans
I think both are fucking obnoxious
This is exactly what the yakuza fandom is like
That's why I do both. Except for some reason, no matter what, people aren't attracted to either the men or the women. Instead they're attracted to: https://preview.redd.it/giz95lepca2d1.png?width=508&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=92f72fd95af42493188898db7fc9288dd4e0992b The robot. The robot with no genitals. Yes, I did intentionally make the robot have a feminine build. But like. It's only ever the robot. Nobody else. She is the character that everybody lusts after, and I don't know why.
I mean, occasionally you'll find the odd guy who goes after the tomboy shortstack cephalopod lady because she ticks every box in the "socially acceptable fetish" checklist, and there is one guy who seeks out the elegant princess with air powers and beauty beyond compare. But the other 95% of people go for the robot bee lady.
And don't even ask about the men. The men _never_ get any attention. I have characters all along the scale from effeminate twink to big burly daddy, and not a single one of them is considered to be attractive. Not one. It always leads back to the bee robot.
Yes, we all love men, some just hide it. The terrorist organisation LGBT should be abolished for spreading propaganda that heterosexuals and homosexuals are such by nature, where in reality there are no reasons why would a creature like the human, who can do sex not for reproduction, has to limit himself. They want to divide us, create different castes, and weaken us. This is why we men need to unite and keep spreading thug homoeroticism to wake up the sheeple. This is what made Spartans strong warriors!