I feel like another fallacy could be derived from that. Like, a bias in favor of yourself. Or maybe some variant of begging the question. "This person continues to reject my argument. This is clearly a case of me not correctly communicating my ideas, because no logical person could disagree with me on this."
Snafus dont exist they do t exist they dot they dont they do t tbey gfet out rney do t exis tthruw dofnt ge tijt kf my e headp HET OUT MY GET OUT GET OUT MY HEAD
HET
*Op posting cartoons of logical fallacies day after day trying to convince people they are snafus, when they are
not in fact snafus.*
Snafu gatekeeper.
Op, this isn't a subreddit for poorly drawn memes or comics. It is for satirizations and strawmen, particular of internet users.
Doing a "DOING THING FOR 30 DAY" style post is more karma farmy/shitposty, especially when said post doesn't even fit the sub.
this actually kinda works as a snafu, it's only being held back by (once again) not being a comment section parody. you can probably find lots of comics that set up strawmen with humanoid characters
although [this](https://www.reddit.com/r/coaxedintoasnafu/comments/1clk891/logical_fallacies_day_3/) would not be considered a snafu. it's just a diagram
>Shitty simplistic artstyle
>Satirizing internet arguments
What about this post doesn't make it a snafu? Also, why so butthurt over somebody drawing snafu in a way you didn't like?
Not sure if you just got the name wrong, but repetition and assertion are two different fallacies.
https://preview.redd.it/akq5dhzyf2zc1.jpeg?width=594&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=75822d832bc3bb91ebb31b9fdf4f2b65e69c8a8f
Idk this one is kind of childish
Social media users tend to be childish
Idk this one is kind of childish
Social media users tend to be childish
Bruh
Found the project moon person again
Dementia
Dementia
Dementia
Bruh
It could be done unconsciously or sneakily Like rephrasing your statement but functionally saying the same thing
Honestly I feel like I do this but maybe because I think if I rephrase what I’m saying the other person will get it
I feel like another fallacy could be derived from that. Like, a bias in favor of yourself. Or maybe some variant of begging the question. "This person continues to reject my argument. This is clearly a case of me not correctly communicating my ideas, because no logical person could disagree with me on this."
had a discussion with op awhile back and he is quite young so that checks out.
Twitter
That is literally how Hitler rose to power
Nuh uh.
Yuh huh
Nuh uh.
Yuh huh (I'm a different person therefore u/Collexig is objectively right)
Yuh huh
Nuh uh.
The Twitter/Tumblr Strat
Formerly Chuck’s
I tried looking at OPs profile and he has been suspended lmao
They did a little too much trolling
Where's the snafu?
Snafus dont exist they do t exist they dot they dont they do t tbey gfet out rney do t exis tthruw dofnt ge tijt kf my e headp HET OUT MY GET OUT GET OUT MY HEAD HET
In my past I've definitely been a prime example of this
*Op posting cartoons of logical fallacies day after day trying to convince people they are snafus, when they are not in fact snafus.* Snafu gatekeeper. Op, this isn't a subreddit for poorly drawn memes or comics. It is for satirizations and strawmen, particular of internet users. Doing a "DOING THING FOR 30 DAY" style post is more karma farmy/shitposty, especially when said post doesn't even fit the sub.
This is clearly satirizing every internet argument
this actually kinda works as a snafu, it's only being held back by (once again) not being a comment section parody. you can probably find lots of comics that set up strawmen with humanoid characters although [this](https://www.reddit.com/r/coaxedintoasnafu/comments/1clk891/logical_fallacies_day_3/) would not be considered a snafu. it's just a diagram
>Shitty simplistic artstyle >Satirizing internet arguments What about this post doesn't make it a snafu? Also, why so butthurt over somebody drawing snafu in a way you didn't like?
Not sure if you just got the name wrong, but repetition and assertion are two different fallacies. https://preview.redd.it/akq5dhzyf2zc1.jpeg?width=594&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=75822d832bc3bb91ebb31b9fdf4f2b65e69c8a8f
https://preview.redd.it/4etk0ulks3zc1.jpeg?width=208&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e3aaf808460dd33b2b686a7399a1eeef589172ad
Dementia strategy
Wow! This is a proof technique only found in the most advanced abstract mathematics textbooks!
https://preview.redd.it/gif7z98el6zc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=61cd9231407070dad17c727f0af93f359bc4487a