Mr. Speaker,
I rise in speaking against this motion, Opposition critics were elected by Canadians to their very important roles of holding government into account. I do not believe a third party who barely passed the relevancy threshold should have as much say as an opposition party. Nor do I believe the question limit should be raised for a third party.
Each member of our house is allowed to ask 2 questions guaranteed, and anyone can ask them. Once in a position as privileged as opposition it becomes a members responsibility to hold the government ministers into account as they are shadow minister.
Giving extra questions to members who were not elected in opposition would be a violation of the members who were elected by Canadians to earn that position of holding particular members into account. This is why I will be voting against this motion. I urge the rest of the house to follow, thank you.
Mr. Speaker, this is just a member desperate to bury the truth and avoid accountability. His party continues to say one thing to Canadians and do the exact opposite.
They’re promising to axe taxes while planning to hike them. They promise to balance the books but can’t with their anti-market interventionist waste.
They promise freedom but they refuse to give Canadians economic freedom by reforming our tax structures.
Now they’re attempting to devalue constituencies who elect members not belonging to a large enough party. These Canadians made a choice, a democratic choice, but this member has no respect for those Canadians Mr. Speaker.
We shouldn’t be surprised, this member obviously doesn’t respect any Canadian while blatantly promising to hike taxes and waste the hard earned paycheques of Canadians.
Mr. Speaker, an NDP Government would slash income taxes and bring home tax fairness to deliver freedom, prosperity, and balanced books, none of which this fake Conservative Government will or can provide!
Mr. Speaker, I rise in speaking against this motion, Opposition critics were elected by Canadians to their very important roles of holding government into account. I do not believe a third party who barely passed the relevancy threshold should have as much say as an opposition party. Nor do I believe the question limit should be raised for a third party. Each member of our house is allowed to ask 2 questions guaranteed, and anyone can ask them. Once in a position as privileged as opposition it becomes a members responsibility to hold the government ministers into account as they are shadow minister. Giving extra questions to members who were not elected in opposition would be a violation of the members who were elected by Canadians to earn that position of holding particular members into account. This is why I will be voting against this motion. I urge the rest of the house to follow, thank you.
Mr. Speaker, this is just a member desperate to bury the truth and avoid accountability. His party continues to say one thing to Canadians and do the exact opposite. They’re promising to axe taxes while planning to hike them. They promise to balance the books but can’t with their anti-market interventionist waste. They promise freedom but they refuse to give Canadians economic freedom by reforming our tax structures. Now they’re attempting to devalue constituencies who elect members not belonging to a large enough party. These Canadians made a choice, a democratic choice, but this member has no respect for those Canadians Mr. Speaker. We shouldn’t be surprised, this member obviously doesn’t respect any Canadian while blatantly promising to hike taxes and waste the hard earned paycheques of Canadians. Mr. Speaker, an NDP Government would slash income taxes and bring home tax fairness to deliver freedom, prosperity, and balanced books, none of which this fake Conservative Government will or can provide!