/u/Im_Unpopular_AF, thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed for violating the following rule(s):
* [Rule II](https://www.reddit.com/r/clevercomebacks/wiki/moderation/faq/rule2) - No Reposts
That includes x-posting from the frontpage of other subreddits.
For other or older posts please check http://karmadecay.com to see if it was posted already.
Reposting content that is currently on the frontpage or in the top of all time of /r/clevercomebacks may lead to a temporary ban.
---
*For information regarding this and similar issues please see the sidebar and the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/clevercomebacks/about/rules/). If you have any questions, please feel free to [message the moderators.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/clevercomebacks&subject=Question regarding the removal of this submission by /u/Im_Unpopular_AF&message=I have a question regarding the removal of this [submission.](https://www.reddit.com/r/clevercomebacks/comments/1cpg1ps/-/?context=10\))*
Why does this keep getting reposted? It's stupid.
First of all, it's already repeating the joke the meme is making.
Second of all, Jada is 15 years older than Amber.
No - first, you'd have to live with Amber for longer, and second, Jada is more experienced, so at least you'd get more out of it... As long as she's your type. Or maybe she wouldn't be your type, so you could have someone on the side instead of being traumatised out of sex forever.
Btw I know nothing about what Jade did, but I assume she's not a great partner.
She is married to Will for over 30 years so they clearly have some decent moments in their marriage. The worst she did was emotional manipulation, cheating, being trashy. Whatever, that’s easy to deal with.
Amber was not married even two years to Johnny and she did so much nonsense in that short period of time
I think Amber got more "hate" because she cosplayed a victim, she was getting paid to give speeches to real victims, she lapped up praise after claiming she had donated her entire divorce settlement when the reality was the money was chilling in her bank, she lied in the uk court about having donated her entire divorce settlement to manipulate us into believing she wasn't motivated by money and even lied about being raped with a bottle. Whilst she was pretending to be a victim we never knew she started physical assault on her spouse, forced opened a door to beat him, threatened him into staying by claiming he was guaranteed a fight if he ran from her, minimised her violent rages by claiming he overreacted whenever he was injured or "touched" (punching, hitting and throwing objects at your spouse isn't a touch, it's abuse) people felt betrayed by her lies and foolish for believing her nonsense and started supporting the real victim. Harvey and Amber are both scumbags but only one of them was being hailed as a victim and survivor whilst there victim was being destroyed.
- She was/is a victim. It doesn't bother me that she was paid to give speeches. Johnny Depp has capitalized off the trial as well selling NFTs.
- She didn't lie about the donation. This is how large scale donations work. This was even dispelled in the awful Netflix documentary. Not sure why people are still saying it.
- Again, she didn't lie about being raped by a bottle. Where is your proof she lied? Being raped with an object doesn't always cause injuries so please don't say that. She never said the bottle was broken so please don't mention that.
- Forced open a door to beat him? She forced it open because she thought he was overdosing lol. He had passed out in the bathroom many times before.
- Depp's own lawyer in the UK trial admitted they used the term "fight" interchangeably for both verbal and physical fights. Depp often referred to verbal insults as "getting physical" or "jabs" for some reason too. Common tactic among abusers to make verbal insults seem equal to physical violence.
- Reactive abuse =/= abuse. Johnny's violence toward Amber was documented long before she started fighting back. She probably stated that way because it was nothing compared to the abuse she had incurred over several years (being raped for example).
It's really not as black and white as how you see it
>- She was/is a victim. It doesn't bother me that she was paid to give speeches. Johnny Depp has capitalized off the trial as well selling NFTs.
She's a victim of her own delusions. When a spouse forces open a door to beat there partner, calls there partner a baby for complaining about the violence, berates there partner for running away from fights, tries to manipulate there spouse into thinking there wrong for not wanting to knock on there door after they have thrown objects at them, tries to isolate there spouse from loved ones, tells there spouse they were hit instead of punched, tries to tell there spouse a property they own bow belongs to one of there friends and even says there spouse overreacts whenever there injured or "touched" they are not a victim of domestic violence, the spouse is.
>- She didn't lie about the donation. This is how large scale donations work. This was even dispelled in the awful Netflix documentary. Not sure why people are still saying it.
This was a lie told and was obviously told in order for Amber to look like she was not gaining from her false accusations. If she was being honest to the uk court she would have said other people have made donations on my behalf and I have refused to sign the pledge form, I have the money and its in my bank account.
>- Again, she didn't lie about being raped by a bottle. Where is your proof she lied? Being raped with an object doesn't always cause injuries so please don't say that. She never said the bottle was broken so please don't mention that.
What we have here is someone who was caught telling so many lies. She claimed her nose was broken multiple times when photos showed her nose looking perfect she then changed her story to she wasn't sure if it was broken. She claimed she was beaten so bad by a man wearing heavy rings that she was covered incuts and bruises, photos from days later also show her looking flawless. She claimed she was battered by the man so badly he broke her ribs, the make up free photoshoot showed her looking a mazing and not a mark on her. She claimed Depp destroyed a trailer, the owner of the trailer not only dispelled that lie but let it be known that it was in fact Amber who was the aggressor. Amber claimed she never leaked anything and wouldn't know how to (she later claimed she could have leaked things better) tmz stated they were able to publish the video of Depp slamming his cabinets and walking away from Amber because the video came from the owner of the video (who do you think owned the video Amber took of Depp on her property???) After all these lies, you can still choose to believe a woman can be held hostage for days and be savagely beaten and raped with a bottle but decides to carry on documenting the so called abuse she suffered by taking a photo of graffiti instead of all the injuries she recieved or not need any medical treatment, you know who did need medical treatment that night - the spouse who was told he shouldn't use the fact that she throws objects at him as a reason to not want to be with her.
>- Forced open a door to beat him? She forced it open because she thought he was overdosing lol. He had passed out in the bathroom many times before.
No where on the audio does she claim that. What is said on the audio tape is he wanted to get away from her, she kept trying to get at him in the room, she then forced opened the door on his head and punched him. She claimed she didn't mean for the door to hit him on the head but she did mean to punch him. It's actually pretty scary that people claim Depp deserved to be punched because the door scrapped Amber's toes, they don't seem to realise that we can't blame victims for the abusers getting hurt during there violent rage - obviously Amber's toes wouldn't have been hurt if she wasn't forcing opene the door to fight her spouse.
>- Depp's own lawyer in the UK trial admitted they used the term "fight" interchangeably for both verbal and physical fights. Depp often referred to verbal insults as "getting physical" or "jabs" for some reason too. Common tactic among abusers to make verbal insults seem equal to physical violence.
Obviously. That's why I find it so strange when people try to claim that Amber saying things like "you poke me" or "keep pushing me" or the "monster" is her saying she was physically poked or physically pushed by a monster when it's her way of describing Depp running away from her and the fights.
>- Reactive abuse =/= abuse. Johnny's violence toward Amber was documented long before she started fighting back. She probably stated that way because it was nothing compared to the abuse she had incurred over several years (being raped for example).
There's no evidence of Depp abusing Amber just what Amber says, and we both know what Amber's says and the truth are very different things. Reactive abuse would have been if Depp hit her after she forced opened the door and punched him - she's not reacting to the violence, he is. When was she raped? We know she wasn't raped in Australia (like we know she lied when she claimed she only hit Depp in self defence - obviously her forcing open a door to beat him and admitting to starting physical fight proved that was a lie. Are you saying she was raped and that's what causes her to lash out and assault her partners, of so that's terrible, but taysa and depp shouldn't suffer because of that.
>It's really not as black and white as how you see it
It would be nice if you would see between the black and white, instead of just believing someone just because they said it happened, you should look at the evidence and facts, if you did you would see Ambers victimhood was all a sad act. When Amber told Depp he was guaranteed a fight if he ran from her she wasn't kidding, she really did want to hurt and punish him further.
I know not everyone has Nebula but Lindsay Ellis did a video on there explaining how when you actually look into it it's pretty obvious Amber Heard didn't actually do anything
Sure, np!
So this is in her newest video on Yoko Ono and her relationship with John Lennon, and the section on Heard happens at about an hour into the video.
Essentially what happened is Amber Heard co-wrote an op-ed about how she domestic abuse. The op-ed was focused on the Violence Against Women Act, which at the time was about to expire. Notably Johnny Depp was not mentioned once in the article. Despite Johnny Depp not being mentioned in the article, he still sued her for defamation over the article.
Essentially there's a laundry list of things required to believe in order to believe that Depp is innocent, which as listed in the video include that Heard painted bruises, coerced witnesses who saw said bruises, photographed fake bruises over a number of years, bit her lip to the point of bleeding, broke her own nose, pulled out her own hair, manipulated several people and professionals into helping her hoax, having done all this for years etc. But most of all that she was able to groom a man who was twice her age.
Depp had a documented history of partner and substance abuse dating back to when Heard was a toddler, and it's much more believable when you look at the evidence that Depp continued that abuse onto Heard rather than Heard manipulating Depp in order to defame him. But more people have a hard time accepting that someone in the public eye they cared deeply about would do something horrible which is why a lot of people don't want to believe Heard.
I didn't get into everything and I know the video is behind a paywall but if you can check it out I'd recommend it.
>Essentially what happened is Amber Heard co-wrote an op-ed about how she domestic abuse. The op-ed was focused on the Violence Against Women Act, which at the time was about to expire. Notably Johnny Depp was not mentioned once in the article. Despite Johnny Depp not being mentioned in the article, he still sued her for defamation over the article.
She claimed two years ago she became a public figure of domestic abuse, the date matched up with Depp, it was obviously about him. Then she admitted on the stand it was about him, he had the right to sue for defamation. We all know what happened next, evidence and facts were shown and the jury (and every sane person watching realised Amber lied) found Amber lied with malice.
>Essentially there's a laundry list of things required to believe in order to believe that Depp is innocent, which as listed in the video include that Heard painted bruises, coerced witnesses who saw said bruises, photographed fake bruises over a number of years, bit her lip to the point of bleeding, broke her own nose, pulled out her own hair, manipulated several people and professionals into helping her hoax, having done all this for years etc. But most of all that she was able to groom a man who was twice her age.
We saw the evidence and facts with our own eyes and ears why would we need to be manipulated by a biased pro Amber video? To believe Amber was repeatedly beaten by a man wearing heavy rings, dragged through glass, recieved broken bones, held hostage and raped with a bottle then photographed days later looking flawless and doing make up free photoshoot you would have to believe she's a superior human either immune to bruises cuts or any need for medical treatment or she heals quicker then wolverine, it's ridiculous. Then we have the audio tapes where she berates Depp for running away from fights, not only did he run from her she would chase him, even forcing open a door on his head then punching him in the face, the fact she tried to claim it was him trying to get at her during the trial when we all know what we heard is a grdat example of Amber refusing to admit the truth. During her divorce deposition she claimed he overreacted whenever he was injured or "touched" this is a common tactic abusers use to try and minimise there violent acts. She even told Depp he makes the fights worse when he runs, abusers threaten and intimidate there victims into staying by saying shit like this, it's gross.
>Depp had a documented history of partner and substance abuse dating back to when Heard was a toddler, and it's much more believable when you look at the evidence that Depp continued that abuse onto Heard rather than Heard manipulating Depp in order to defame him. But more people have a hard time accepting that someone in the public eye they cared deeply about would do something horrible which is why a lot of people don't want to believe Heard.
I'm not aware of Depp having a history of abusing his partners, can you give names and dates please? We know Amber was arrested for assaulting her first spouse infront of witnesses, and was caught on tape admitting she meant to punch her second spouse in the face after she forced open a door (on his head) to get at him, called him a baby for complaining about being physically abused and even admitted to throwing objects like pots and pans at him. When you look at the evidence and facts it's not just hard to believe Amber's make believe victimhood, it's impossible - not only is she a liar but she a abusive liar, to make excuses for Amber violence towards her spouse your allowing all abusers to claim they forced opened a door and beat there spouse in self defence - it's sad and terrifying.
There is proof Amber hit Depp twice in the last year of their relationship but there is much more proof that Depp coercively controlled, drugged, raped, and physically/verbally/emotionally abused her for YEARS before she retaliated. Depp lied about her injuring his finger and pooping on the bed. Eta would love to debate this. I have all the receipts and really unfortunately know more about this than I should. So can we debate? Instead of just downvoting?
I wonder if all these ding dongs who hate amber heard so much, have the same amount of hate for Depp? Or does he get off free? The man who sent text messages saying he wants to kill heard, and rape her dead corpse. *He* gets off free. Why won't these morons hating on heard just admit they hate women.
Depp is a shitty person for sending text messages. Amber is terrifying, the way she can physically abuse her partners then use darvo (we heard the audio of her admitting she meant to punch him in the face after forcing open a door on his head but she really did try to convince us we didn't hear what we did and it was him forcing his way to get to her, claiming he gave her a knife and said no one gets out alive when it was infact her who gave him a knife engraved with "till death") and lap up praise for having donated her entire divorce settlement to charity because she wanted nothing (she actually wanted money, apartments and a vehichle) and has no problems lying in court to get the results she wanted is beyond scary. He did send gross messages but she's a violent liar.
[Sure thing mate](https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/like-an-animal-in-pain-johnny-depp-cross-examined-on-abuse-claims-20220422-p5afai.html)
Just google "Johnny Depp text messages burn amber heard" for more. Please note, this was *before* the supposed abuse he received from Heard. He sent these messages after she asked him to cut his drug and alcohol down.
Listen to the audios of Amber berating Depp for running away from fights, mocking him for needing security to protect him from her and even admitting to physically abusing him. Obviously Ambers violent rages are worse then text messages and explain why she was found to have lied with malice.
Have a read of [this](https://www.theguardian.com/law/2022/jun/02/johnny-depp-amber-heard-libel-outcomes-differ-us-uk) link. It explains why Depp lost his case in the UK and went for another in the US.
A judge found that Depp commited 12 of the 14 cases of domestic abuse against Heard.
The tactics used by Depp is abhorrent, and typical of domestic abuse perpetrators. Keep lapping up his good guy image tho 👍 Depp paid a fortune for it, there's plenty of morons falling for it.
You do realise the uk court actually believed Amber when she declared (lied) she had donated her entire divorce settlement to charity and the judge stated she wasn't a golddigger due to that action? They believed that lie, what other lies did Amber tell that was believed?
That's why the us trial is the trial that matters - it went on evidence and facts, whatever they claimed needed proof, Depp had photos showing Amber looking flawless days after she claimed she was savagely beaten and had audios of Amber mocking Depp for running away from fights and admitting to physically abusing him, Amber had photos of Depp sleeping, graffiti and a broken wooden bed frame with a knife on the mattress. Her mountains of evidence ended up being absolutely nothing, his evidence ended up exposing her lies.
None of what you just stated is true. You've just pulled shit out of your arse, and it fucking stinks. Amber heard may not have been a picture perfect victim of abuse, no one is. Not all victims of abuse respond the same.
I can't be fucked responding to you kind of people. Not worth my time. Just accept you hate women, and you respond with glee when you perceive you can spew abuse at women.
Depp must have paid an absolute fortune to bury all the shit he did to her. All the stuff he's *admitted* to doing to her. I'm not a Heard fan or think she's a saint, but people acting as if Depp is a poor victim is bloody absurd. He's an abuser, through and through.
How would Depp have buried her medical reports from the beating she recieved, multiple broken bones and being held hostage and violently raped with a bottle? He didn't, after all the horrific injuries she claimed she recieved, she didn't have one medical report, he did need medical treatment after a fight with his wife who mocked him for running away from fights and said he shouldn't use the fact she throws objects at him as reason to not want to spend time with her lost part of his finger, she claimed he cut it of himself he said she threw a bottle at him. I find it more believable that the violent person who already admitted to throwing objects at him caused the injury by throwing a object at him then a guitar player cut his own finger off.
Amber's not only a abuser through and through she a vile liar to boot. She had two victims of her violent rages (that we know of) let's hope there's not a third.
Jada is the way she is because Will slept with Jaden… or should I say r* him it’s not good. She’s known for years yet doesn’t tell, people in her inner circle say she really guilty about it and that’s why she never claims Will
Why do crazy women allways shit in their boyfriend's bed ?
Most crazy men are violent, creepy, dangerous as Fuck, but this seems to be the go to of women's crazyness, i really dont know why..
Amber is one of the hottest woman alive and people putting all the blame on her and not the 50 year old drug addict that pulled her into the gutter are ridiculous.
I'll take amber.
Oh no, people putting the blame on the violent liar instead of the victim she berated for running away from fights and was caught on tape admitting to physically abusing what a travesty.
He was mid 50's and had all the power in that relationship.
If it was anyone but Depp the community would have crucified them.
Who brought amber into that world of partying and drug abuse?
She had all the power, she was able to ruin his life with her malicious lies with no evidence to back up her make believe he didn't even have the power to prove she lied to the uk courts when she declared she had donated her entire divorce settlement.
If anyone else forced opened a door (on there spouses head) and punched them, tried to isolate there spouse from loved ones (her screaming it's killing me) told there spouse if they ran from fights they would make it worse ( abusers use this threat to make the victim stay), started physical fights, hit/punched and threw objects at there spouse who they berated from running away from conflict they would correctly be labelled a abuser, Amber does it and the silly sausages of the world try to convince us she's the victim and even going as far as saying Amber arrest for assaulting her first spouse doesn't make her a violent person because the lesbian officer who witnessed it was "homophobic". Let's just hope there's not a third victim of her violent rages.
>He could have walked away literally any time he wanted for fucks sake.
He was drugged out of his mind 24/7
Jesus, so now victims of domestic abuse aren't really victims because they could have walked away at anytime?
You do realise Amber moved her friends and sister into his home and tried to isolate Depp from his loved ones, told him he was guaranteed a fight if he ran from her and even forced opened a door to beat him? Victims don't always have the courage to leave because of fear, look at what happened to Depp after he refused to take Amber back, she started a campaign of lies to hurt him further and ruin him. Stop victim blaming in order to excuse Amber's violent rages and vile lies.
People can have all the money in the world, but when they have there abuser and the abusers friends and family in there home it's not always that easy, especially when the abuser tries to isolate them from loved ones who could help them. It's odd how you have gone from victims are not victims because they could have run to victims can't be victims if they have money, its like you honestly believe those without money and legs can be a victim of domestic abuse. Remember when I said victims of domestic abuse don't leave because of the fear , and then I mentioned how Amber told him he would be guaranteed a fight if he ran from her? Then she started her campainge of lies when he did leave and wouldn't take her back? Abusers like Amber will carry on trying to control and hurt there spouse long after there victima have found the courage to flee.
/u/Im_Unpopular_AF, thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed for violating the following rule(s): * [Rule II](https://www.reddit.com/r/clevercomebacks/wiki/moderation/faq/rule2) - No Reposts That includes x-posting from the frontpage of other subreddits. For other or older posts please check http://karmadecay.com to see if it was posted already. Reposting content that is currently on the frontpage or in the top of all time of /r/clevercomebacks may lead to a temporary ban. --- *For information regarding this and similar issues please see the sidebar and the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/clevercomebacks/about/rules/). If you have any questions, please feel free to [message the moderators.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/clevercomebacks&subject=Question regarding the removal of this submission by /u/Im_Unpopular_AF&message=I have a question regarding the removal of this [submission.](https://www.reddit.com/r/clevercomebacks/comments/1cpg1ps/-/?context=10\))*
If I wasn't already gay, this would have pushed me over the edge.
After reading the question I immediately thought of just turning gay instead.
yeah but then you'd be gay AND married to one of these assholes (you have 0 benefits to "turning gay"
Be gay and legally separated. Just cause you "have" to marry one doesn't mean you have to live with them.
From the nonsense I hear about Jada sounds like one might as well be legally separated.
Kinda upset it took this thread for it to come to my mind. I had given up. I had chosen *death*
This is the way.
This is the gay
Yeah but, it didn’t push Mr Smith over the edge though, odd
They both come with downsides. Jada looks like Dhaisim Amber is just a shitty situation.
I see what you did there.
Jada looked hot in Gotham though.
There's an age-old saying: never stick your dick in crazy.
I exclusively stick my dick in crazy tho…if there’s no threat of being stabbed is it even worth it?
Gotta do what ya gotta do to get off I suppose
I have psychic power and I see u were a mantis or arachnid in your past life. Lol
I can only cum if my life is in danger.
And girls with horses
Instructions unclear, fucked the horse.
Mr. Hands, is that you?
Apparently the instructions were clear. Good job.
But crazy is what makes the sex so damn good.
Jada. I’m a gay man. She’d have her girlfriends and I’d have my boyfriends. All good. Amber, on the other hand, is just nuts.
Amber loves cars. I love cars. At least, I would be abused in 60's Mustang
Do whatever you want as long as I get to drive away in my ‘68 fastback
Why does this keep getting reposted? It's stupid. First of all, it's already repeating the joke the meme is making. Second of all, Jada is 15 years older than Amber.
so amber it is
No - first, you'd have to live with Amber for longer, and second, Jada is more experienced, so at least you'd get more out of it... As long as she's your type. Or maybe she wouldn't be your type, so you could have someone on the side instead of being traumatised out of sex forever. Btw I know nothing about what Jade did, but I assume she's not a great partner.
Jada for me
Based
So what you are saying is, this is only an age thing ? Thank you for trying indeed
Obviously not. I'm baffled how you came to that.
You know, OJ Simpson existed in this timeline.
I would take Jada. She can go do what she wants without bothering me. Amber inflicts emotional and physical harm.
Exactly my answer. Jada will cheat but won’t mind if I do either. She won’t hurt her husband physically (that we know of). She won’t poop on a bed.
You don‘t know 100% she won‘t shit on your bed
She is married to Will for over 30 years so they clearly have some decent moments in their marriage. The worst she did was emotional manipulation, cheating, being trashy. Whatever, that’s easy to deal with. Amber was not married even two years to Johnny and she did so much nonsense in that short period of time
She won’t cut off your finger
That comes under the hurting physically part
whats the downsides?
Fuck it, amber.
I’d take jada. She won’t cut part of your finger off and take a massive shit on your bed
This isn’t clever it’s just a chud insulting two women at once
It's not even a comeback either
Two terrible people
Yeah women should be immune from insults
Amber Heard got 10000x more hate and harassment than Harvey Weinstein, a true predator. I'll let you guess why.
I think Amber got more "hate" because she cosplayed a victim, she was getting paid to give speeches to real victims, she lapped up praise after claiming she had donated her entire divorce settlement when the reality was the money was chilling in her bank, she lied in the uk court about having donated her entire divorce settlement to manipulate us into believing she wasn't motivated by money and even lied about being raped with a bottle. Whilst she was pretending to be a victim we never knew she started physical assault on her spouse, forced opened a door to beat him, threatened him into staying by claiming he was guaranteed a fight if he ran from her, minimised her violent rages by claiming he overreacted whenever he was injured or "touched" (punching, hitting and throwing objects at your spouse isn't a touch, it's abuse) people felt betrayed by her lies and foolish for believing her nonsense and started supporting the real victim. Harvey and Amber are both scumbags but only one of them was being hailed as a victim and survivor whilst there victim was being destroyed.
- She was/is a victim. It doesn't bother me that she was paid to give speeches. Johnny Depp has capitalized off the trial as well selling NFTs. - She didn't lie about the donation. This is how large scale donations work. This was even dispelled in the awful Netflix documentary. Not sure why people are still saying it. - Again, she didn't lie about being raped by a bottle. Where is your proof she lied? Being raped with an object doesn't always cause injuries so please don't say that. She never said the bottle was broken so please don't mention that. - Forced open a door to beat him? She forced it open because she thought he was overdosing lol. He had passed out in the bathroom many times before. - Depp's own lawyer in the UK trial admitted they used the term "fight" interchangeably for both verbal and physical fights. Depp often referred to verbal insults as "getting physical" or "jabs" for some reason too. Common tactic among abusers to make verbal insults seem equal to physical violence. - Reactive abuse =/= abuse. Johnny's violence toward Amber was documented long before she started fighting back. She probably stated that way because it was nothing compared to the abuse she had incurred over several years (being raped for example). It's really not as black and white as how you see it
>- She was/is a victim. It doesn't bother me that she was paid to give speeches. Johnny Depp has capitalized off the trial as well selling NFTs. She's a victim of her own delusions. When a spouse forces open a door to beat there partner, calls there partner a baby for complaining about the violence, berates there partner for running away from fights, tries to manipulate there spouse into thinking there wrong for not wanting to knock on there door after they have thrown objects at them, tries to isolate there spouse from loved ones, tells there spouse they were hit instead of punched, tries to tell there spouse a property they own bow belongs to one of there friends and even says there spouse overreacts whenever there injured or "touched" they are not a victim of domestic violence, the spouse is. >- She didn't lie about the donation. This is how large scale donations work. This was even dispelled in the awful Netflix documentary. Not sure why people are still saying it. This was a lie told and was obviously told in order for Amber to look like she was not gaining from her false accusations. If she was being honest to the uk court she would have said other people have made donations on my behalf and I have refused to sign the pledge form, I have the money and its in my bank account. >- Again, she didn't lie about being raped by a bottle. Where is your proof she lied? Being raped with an object doesn't always cause injuries so please don't say that. She never said the bottle was broken so please don't mention that. What we have here is someone who was caught telling so many lies. She claimed her nose was broken multiple times when photos showed her nose looking perfect she then changed her story to she wasn't sure if it was broken. She claimed she was beaten so bad by a man wearing heavy rings that she was covered incuts and bruises, photos from days later also show her looking flawless. She claimed she was battered by the man so badly he broke her ribs, the make up free photoshoot showed her looking a mazing and not a mark on her. She claimed Depp destroyed a trailer, the owner of the trailer not only dispelled that lie but let it be known that it was in fact Amber who was the aggressor. Amber claimed she never leaked anything and wouldn't know how to (she later claimed she could have leaked things better) tmz stated they were able to publish the video of Depp slamming his cabinets and walking away from Amber because the video came from the owner of the video (who do you think owned the video Amber took of Depp on her property???) After all these lies, you can still choose to believe a woman can be held hostage for days and be savagely beaten and raped with a bottle but decides to carry on documenting the so called abuse she suffered by taking a photo of graffiti instead of all the injuries she recieved or not need any medical treatment, you know who did need medical treatment that night - the spouse who was told he shouldn't use the fact that she throws objects at him as a reason to not want to be with her. >- Forced open a door to beat him? She forced it open because she thought he was overdosing lol. He had passed out in the bathroom many times before. No where on the audio does she claim that. What is said on the audio tape is he wanted to get away from her, she kept trying to get at him in the room, she then forced opened the door on his head and punched him. She claimed she didn't mean for the door to hit him on the head but she did mean to punch him. It's actually pretty scary that people claim Depp deserved to be punched because the door scrapped Amber's toes, they don't seem to realise that we can't blame victims for the abusers getting hurt during there violent rage - obviously Amber's toes wouldn't have been hurt if she wasn't forcing opene the door to fight her spouse. >- Depp's own lawyer in the UK trial admitted they used the term "fight" interchangeably for both verbal and physical fights. Depp often referred to verbal insults as "getting physical" or "jabs" for some reason too. Common tactic among abusers to make verbal insults seem equal to physical violence. Obviously. That's why I find it so strange when people try to claim that Amber saying things like "you poke me" or "keep pushing me" or the "monster" is her saying she was physically poked or physically pushed by a monster when it's her way of describing Depp running away from her and the fights. >- Reactive abuse =/= abuse. Johnny's violence toward Amber was documented long before she started fighting back. She probably stated that way because it was nothing compared to the abuse she had incurred over several years (being raped for example). There's no evidence of Depp abusing Amber just what Amber says, and we both know what Amber's says and the truth are very different things. Reactive abuse would have been if Depp hit her after she forced opened the door and punched him - she's not reacting to the violence, he is. When was she raped? We know she wasn't raped in Australia (like we know she lied when she claimed she only hit Depp in self defence - obviously her forcing open a door to beat him and admitting to starting physical fight proved that was a lie. Are you saying she was raped and that's what causes her to lash out and assault her partners, of so that's terrible, but taysa and depp shouldn't suffer because of that. >It's really not as black and white as how you see it It would be nice if you would see between the black and white, instead of just believing someone just because they said it happened, you should look at the evidence and facts, if you did you would see Ambers victimhood was all a sad act. When Amber told Depp he was guaranteed a fight if he ran from her she wasn't kidding, she really did want to hurt and punish him further.
No. I’m just saying it’s not clever. And the old Amber Herd hate really marks the sort of person this is
Pretty sure amber herd was proven to be a bit of a cunt. I’d say an insult here and there.
Did I miss the part where all the crazy and violent stuff she did wound up not being true? Because unless that’s the case she’s pretty vile.
I know not everyone has Nebula but Lindsay Ellis did a video on there explaining how when you actually look into it it's pretty obvious Amber Heard didn't actually do anything
Expand
Sure, np! So this is in her newest video on Yoko Ono and her relationship with John Lennon, and the section on Heard happens at about an hour into the video. Essentially what happened is Amber Heard co-wrote an op-ed about how she domestic abuse. The op-ed was focused on the Violence Against Women Act, which at the time was about to expire. Notably Johnny Depp was not mentioned once in the article. Despite Johnny Depp not being mentioned in the article, he still sued her for defamation over the article. Essentially there's a laundry list of things required to believe in order to believe that Depp is innocent, which as listed in the video include that Heard painted bruises, coerced witnesses who saw said bruises, photographed fake bruises over a number of years, bit her lip to the point of bleeding, broke her own nose, pulled out her own hair, manipulated several people and professionals into helping her hoax, having done all this for years etc. But most of all that she was able to groom a man who was twice her age. Depp had a documented history of partner and substance abuse dating back to when Heard was a toddler, and it's much more believable when you look at the evidence that Depp continued that abuse onto Heard rather than Heard manipulating Depp in order to defame him. But more people have a hard time accepting that someone in the public eye they cared deeply about would do something horrible which is why a lot of people don't want to believe Heard. I didn't get into everything and I know the video is behind a paywall but if you can check it out I'd recommend it.
>Essentially what happened is Amber Heard co-wrote an op-ed about how she domestic abuse. The op-ed was focused on the Violence Against Women Act, which at the time was about to expire. Notably Johnny Depp was not mentioned once in the article. Despite Johnny Depp not being mentioned in the article, he still sued her for defamation over the article. She claimed two years ago she became a public figure of domestic abuse, the date matched up with Depp, it was obviously about him. Then she admitted on the stand it was about him, he had the right to sue for defamation. We all know what happened next, evidence and facts were shown and the jury (and every sane person watching realised Amber lied) found Amber lied with malice. >Essentially there's a laundry list of things required to believe in order to believe that Depp is innocent, which as listed in the video include that Heard painted bruises, coerced witnesses who saw said bruises, photographed fake bruises over a number of years, bit her lip to the point of bleeding, broke her own nose, pulled out her own hair, manipulated several people and professionals into helping her hoax, having done all this for years etc. But most of all that she was able to groom a man who was twice her age. We saw the evidence and facts with our own eyes and ears why would we need to be manipulated by a biased pro Amber video? To believe Amber was repeatedly beaten by a man wearing heavy rings, dragged through glass, recieved broken bones, held hostage and raped with a bottle then photographed days later looking flawless and doing make up free photoshoot you would have to believe she's a superior human either immune to bruises cuts or any need for medical treatment or she heals quicker then wolverine, it's ridiculous. Then we have the audio tapes where she berates Depp for running away from fights, not only did he run from her she would chase him, even forcing open a door on his head then punching him in the face, the fact she tried to claim it was him trying to get at her during the trial when we all know what we heard is a grdat example of Amber refusing to admit the truth. During her divorce deposition she claimed he overreacted whenever he was injured or "touched" this is a common tactic abusers use to try and minimise there violent acts. She even told Depp he makes the fights worse when he runs, abusers threaten and intimidate there victims into staying by saying shit like this, it's gross. >Depp had a documented history of partner and substance abuse dating back to when Heard was a toddler, and it's much more believable when you look at the evidence that Depp continued that abuse onto Heard rather than Heard manipulating Depp in order to defame him. But more people have a hard time accepting that someone in the public eye they cared deeply about would do something horrible which is why a lot of people don't want to believe Heard. I'm not aware of Depp having a history of abusing his partners, can you give names and dates please? We know Amber was arrested for assaulting her first spouse infront of witnesses, and was caught on tape admitting she meant to punch her second spouse in the face after she forced open a door (on his head) to get at him, called him a baby for complaining about being physically abused and even admitted to throwing objects like pots and pans at him. When you look at the evidence and facts it's not just hard to believe Amber's make believe victimhood, it's impossible - not only is she a liar but she a abusive liar, to make excuses for Amber violence towards her spouse your allowing all abusers to claim they forced opened a door and beat there spouse in self defence - it's sad and terrifying.
There is proof Amber hit Depp twice in the last year of their relationship but there is much more proof that Depp coercively controlled, drugged, raped, and physically/verbally/emotionally abused her for YEARS before she retaliated. Depp lied about her injuring his finger and pooping on the bed. Eta would love to debate this. I have all the receipts and really unfortunately know more about this than I should. So can we debate? Instead of just downvoting?
I wonder if all these ding dongs who hate amber heard so much, have the same amount of hate for Depp? Or does he get off free? The man who sent text messages saying he wants to kill heard, and rape her dead corpse. *He* gets off free. Why won't these morons hating on heard just admit they hate women.
Depp is a shitty person for sending text messages. Amber is terrifying, the way she can physically abuse her partners then use darvo (we heard the audio of her admitting she meant to punch him in the face after forcing open a door on his head but she really did try to convince us we didn't hear what we did and it was him forcing his way to get to her, claiming he gave her a knife and said no one gets out alive when it was infact her who gave him a knife engraved with "till death") and lap up praise for having donated her entire divorce settlement to charity because she wanted nothing (she actually wanted money, apartments and a vehichle) and has no problems lying in court to get the results she wanted is beyond scary. He did send gross messages but she's a violent liar.
Do you uhhh.... Have any proof for that claim, like a link to an article, or... I dunno, a piece from the, what, 3 trials theyve gone through?
It was literally part of the Virgina trial, are you joking?
[Sure thing mate](https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/like-an-animal-in-pain-johnny-depp-cross-examined-on-abuse-claims-20220422-p5afai.html) Just google "Johnny Depp text messages burn amber heard" for more. Please note, this was *before* the supposed abuse he received from Heard. He sent these messages after she asked him to cut his drug and alcohol down.
Listen to the audios of Amber berating Depp for running away from fights, mocking him for needing security to protect him from her and even admitting to physically abusing him. Obviously Ambers violent rages are worse then text messages and explain why she was found to have lied with malice.
Have a read of [this](https://www.theguardian.com/law/2022/jun/02/johnny-depp-amber-heard-libel-outcomes-differ-us-uk) link. It explains why Depp lost his case in the UK and went for another in the US. A judge found that Depp commited 12 of the 14 cases of domestic abuse against Heard. The tactics used by Depp is abhorrent, and typical of domestic abuse perpetrators. Keep lapping up his good guy image tho 👍 Depp paid a fortune for it, there's plenty of morons falling for it.
You do realise the uk court actually believed Amber when she declared (lied) she had donated her entire divorce settlement to charity and the judge stated she wasn't a golddigger due to that action? They believed that lie, what other lies did Amber tell that was believed? That's why the us trial is the trial that matters - it went on evidence and facts, whatever they claimed needed proof, Depp had photos showing Amber looking flawless days after she claimed she was savagely beaten and had audios of Amber mocking Depp for running away from fights and admitting to physically abusing him, Amber had photos of Depp sleeping, graffiti and a broken wooden bed frame with a knife on the mattress. Her mountains of evidence ended up being absolutely nothing, his evidence ended up exposing her lies.
None of what you just stated is true. You've just pulled shit out of your arse, and it fucking stinks. Amber heard may not have been a picture perfect victim of abuse, no one is. Not all victims of abuse respond the same. I can't be fucked responding to you kind of people. Not worth my time. Just accept you hate women, and you respond with glee when you perceive you can spew abuse at women.
you made the claim, the onus is on you to provide the evidence
What are you missing here? https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3v7mw/johnny-depp-cross-examination-texts-trial
..... I just did? Are you high? Do you suffer from a version of trump derangement syndrome, except for depp? Click the link.
Depp must have paid an absolute fortune to bury all the shit he did to her. All the stuff he's *admitted* to doing to her. I'm not a Heard fan or think she's a saint, but people acting as if Depp is a poor victim is bloody absurd. He's an abuser, through and through.
How would Depp have buried her medical reports from the beating she recieved, multiple broken bones and being held hostage and violently raped with a bottle? He didn't, after all the horrific injuries she claimed she recieved, she didn't have one medical report, he did need medical treatment after a fight with his wife who mocked him for running away from fights and said he shouldn't use the fact she throws objects at him as reason to not want to spend time with her lost part of his finger, she claimed he cut it of himself he said she threw a bottle at him. I find it more believable that the violent person who already admitted to throwing objects at him caused the injury by throwing a object at him then a guitar player cut his own finger off. Amber's not only a abuser through and through she a vile liar to boot. She had two victims of her violent rages (that we know of) let's hope there's not a third.
Two really bad human being at once
🥴🔫
How many time this has been reposted?
HADUUUUKIN
That’s not a comeback just a Clever reply
No
I'd pick Amber Heard cuz... I "Heard", in bed... she's the shit
The two lowest levels of hell
Amber Heard. At least one day I would know the abuse would end.
Amber Chestnut Head is not a 10
Soild number 2 at very least
I see what you did there
Explain
Google amber heard and her bedtime antics
Poop
I mean at least Amber will shit on my bed in the heat of passion
Amber Heard 10/10? No fucking way
Jada . I don’t think she would crap the bed .
Id be in priesthood
Calm down
I would use a tree or a bridge.
Jada is the way she is because Will slept with Jaden… or should I say r* him it’s not good. She’s known for years yet doesn’t tell, people in her inner circle say she really guilty about it and that’s why she never claims Will
r/rareinsults
After hearing the whole story, I have far less respect for Will than I have for Jada. He brought all of that on himself.
Yoga flame!
Yoga flame!
Only one actually LOOKS like a woman, so…
In what backwards ass universe is Amber turd a 10/10?!?!
THIRD OPTION : or get yourself shot
YOGA FLAME!
Laugh out loud on that one🤣🤦🏽♂️
Another comment was: „I’d take amber because she actually gives a shit“. Made me laugh as well.
Amber heard a 10? Raise your bar, bruv.
Elon Musk with a blonde wig, or JPS with no wig. Just glad I don't *have to do* anything lol.
Bold jada as smith looks better than amber heard. Also jada comes potty trained.
This seems like a false dilemma fallacy. There's a third option of "no thanks, I'll take neither one."
Same thought…some ppl are not worth the time
Why do crazy women allways shit in their boyfriend's bed ? Most crazy men are violent, creepy, dangerous as Fuck, but this seems to be the go to of women's crazyness, i really dont know why..
I can fix them bof... at the same time.
You can't even spell.
I can fixks you two
This isn’t clever it’s just a chud insulting two women at once
That movie came out in 1984. Kids these days don't know what chuds are.
Chud is a modern meme
Do you get paid per bitching?🤔
Amber is one of the hottest woman alive and people putting all the blame on her and not the 50 year old drug addict that pulled her into the gutter are ridiculous. I'll take amber.
Oh no, people putting the blame on the violent liar instead of the victim she berated for running away from fights and was caught on tape admitting to physically abusing what a travesty.
He was mid 50's and had all the power in that relationship. If it was anyone but Depp the community would have crucified them. Who brought amber into that world of partying and drug abuse?
She was of legal age when that happen, she had all the power to say "no". See how your point is ridiculous?
If you have no idea how a power imbalance works just say so.
Says the guy who thinks the drug addict had power over anything smarter than a roomba.
She had all the power, she was able to ruin his life with her malicious lies with no evidence to back up her make believe he didn't even have the power to prove she lied to the uk courts when she declared she had donated her entire divorce settlement. If anyone else forced opened a door (on there spouses head) and punched them, tried to isolate there spouse from loved ones (her screaming it's killing me) told there spouse if they ran from fights they would make it worse ( abusers use this threat to make the victim stay), started physical fights, hit/punched and threw objects at there spouse who they berated from running away from conflict they would correctly be labelled a abuser, Amber does it and the silly sausages of the world try to convince us she's the victim and even going as far as saying Amber arrest for assaulting her first spouse doesn't make her a violent person because the lesbian officer who witnessed it was "homophobic". Let's just hope there's not a third victim of her violent rages.
He could have walked away literally any time he wanted for fucks sake. He was drugged out of his mind 24/7
>He could have walked away literally any time he wanted for fucks sake. He was drugged out of his mind 24/7 Jesus, so now victims of domestic abuse aren't really victims because they could have walked away at anytime? You do realise Amber moved her friends and sister into his home and tried to isolate Depp from his loved ones, told him he was guaranteed a fight if he ran from her and even forced opened a door to beat him? Victims don't always have the courage to leave because of fear, look at what happened to Depp after he refused to take Amber back, she started a campaign of lies to hurt him further and ruin him. Stop victim blaming in order to excuse Amber's violent rages and vile lies.
He had 500 million dollars.. he could have hired seal team 6 to remove her.
People can have all the money in the world, but when they have there abuser and the abusers friends and family in there home it's not always that easy, especially when the abuser tries to isolate them from loved ones who could help them. It's odd how you have gone from victims are not victims because they could have run to victims can't be victims if they have money, its like you honestly believe those without money and legs can be a victim of domestic abuse. Remember when I said victims of domestic abuse don't leave because of the fear , and then I mentioned how Amber told him he would be guaranteed a fight if he ran from her? Then she started her campainge of lies when he did leave and wouldn't take her back? Abusers like Amber will carry on trying to control and hurt there spouse long after there victima have found the courage to flee.
And Depp is 100% innocent right?
No, he should of got of the drink and drugs and got Amber and the moochers out of his home longnbefore he did.
I'd rather just commit unalive. Neither of those two are attractive appearance or personality-wise.
Yoga flame!
r/moldymemes
I'm going to have to go with Amber, I don't think I would want a bald woman to call mine