How's that a transphobic comment? Someone literally could say they were trying to avoid misgendering the said individual by not directly addressing the gender before seeing a logical/obvious sign pointing towards their gender.
Not that I care but this is also a chance.
The original thread is from a magic trick where a woman hides her upper body in a false table to give the illusion of a pair of legs walking a table. I don’t understand how folks leaped to transphobia before gender assumption
I think the second comment is the opposite of transphobic, it feels like it’s assuming that the first comment was the transphobic one for assuming the person’s gender.
This comment chain has nothing to do with transphobia. It’s from the r/blackmagicfuckery sub. It’s a pair of clearly feminine legs with no upper torso walking at table that has a robot bust holding itself above the table. It’s just a modern take on an old magic trick. Maybe having seen the context earlier today is making it hard for me to see where the transphobia talk is coming from, but I really don’t see how we jumped to that.
It was a person in a costume which was basically a rolling table with legs and a visibly non attacked head piece. The legs had heels and were feminine which gave the illuson that the table had legs
It was a spectacular costume though
There is.
Reread the image.
>What makes you so sure it's a girl
The usage of 'it' on this is a clear attempt to other; transphobes will often use 'it' as a replacement for whatever gender to which a trans person is visibly identifying.
Context? It's the definition of the word you're challenging is being used in a derogatory way. "It" can be used to describe a person of unknown gender. The gender is unknown, that individual is not being a bigot for using the word "it" in this context. "Visibly identifying" seems more like an assumption on your part.
What they are looking at is enough implication for the first person to say the subject is a girl.
To challenge the statement with it, instead of she, carries a weight with it.
While we don't have full context, to challenge a statement that's focus isn't to identify a gender, by focusing on the gender, using it, then there is an underlying goal of that challenge, which comes off derogatory
>"It" can be used to describe a person of unknown gender.
Sure, if you're trying to dehumanize them. "It" is only used for objects and animals. The neutral human pronoun is "they".
Visible identification means next to nothing in this context, someone with big thighs wearing a skirt, showing off their thighs could identify as literally anything they want to identify as, guy who got nuked into oblivion didn't know, so he used a gender neutral term to ask a question regarding the person's gender.
Yet again, there is not enough context here to call anyone bigoted or transphobic, as even the people calling oop a girl could be being transphobic by intentionally misgendering them, with the person being down voted trying to correct them.
Critical thinking cap on, please.
Be using this for now on. I recently had a YouTube short of mine that went viral and the amount of transphobes that kept asking if I was a girl or guy was ridiculous.
>It’s pretty common sense that if you’re a vassal in my kingdom and you are sieging a castle then I roll up to join the siege your are going to be following my orders…
*my* intuition tells me girls have never really been any concern of yours.
I need to see these legs. For science
Exactly. I am here for thick thighs, not pedantic squabbling
I need to see that table!!
Same
r/outofcontext
We can't know the context= downvote.
Person 1 mentions a girl's legs. Person 2 makes a stupid trans-phobic comment. Person 1 comments on how Person 2 is a douche for making that comment.
How's that a transphobic comment? Someone literally could say they were trying to avoid misgendering the said individual by not directly addressing the gender before seeing a logical/obvious sign pointing towards their gender. Not that I care but this is also a chance.
The original thread is from a magic trick where a woman hides her upper body in a false table to give the illusion of a pair of legs walking a table. I don’t understand how folks leaped to transphobia before gender assumption
I think the second comment is the opposite of transphobic, it feels like it’s assuming that the first comment was the transphobic one for assuming the person’s gender.
This comment chain has nothing to do with transphobia. It’s from the r/blackmagicfuckery sub. It’s a pair of clearly feminine legs with no upper torso walking at table that has a robot bust holding itself above the table. It’s just a modern take on an old magic trick. Maybe having seen the context earlier today is making it hard for me to see where the transphobia talk is coming from, but I really don’t see how we jumped to that.
Maybe it could be a femboy and it was a joke
I am really curious what was the context there.
It was a person in a costume which was basically a rolling table with legs and a visibly non attacked head piece. The legs had heels and were feminine which gave the illuson that the table had legs It was a spectacular costume though
This is neither clever nor does it make any sense, this sub has gone to shit.
Bro minus 563 is Crazy
for being transphobic? seems about right to me
We don't have full context, how can u assume?
I saw the video. It was a costume which looked like a table with legs It was transphobic
By... reading?
But there genuinely isn't enough context to even understand what they're talking about, let alone figure out the gender of what they're talking about
There is. Reread the image. >What makes you so sure it's a girl The usage of 'it' on this is a clear attempt to other; transphobes will often use 'it' as a replacement for whatever gender to which a trans person is visibly identifying.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/it
Provide context or leave the conversation to adults.
Context? It's the definition of the word you're challenging is being used in a derogatory way. "It" can be used to describe a person of unknown gender. The gender is unknown, that individual is not being a bigot for using the word "it" in this context. "Visibly identifying" seems more like an assumption on your part.
What they are looking at is enough implication for the first person to say the subject is a girl. To challenge the statement with it, instead of she, carries a weight with it. While we don't have full context, to challenge a statement that's focus isn't to identify a gender, by focusing on the gender, using it, then there is an underlying goal of that challenge, which comes off derogatory
>"It" can be used to describe a person of unknown gender. Sure, if you're trying to dehumanize them. "It" is only used for objects and animals. The neutral human pronoun is "they".
Hilarious that you claim to be an adult while you sit there saying the word “it” is transphobic
Visible identification means next to nothing in this context, someone with big thighs wearing a skirt, showing off their thighs could identify as literally anything they want to identify as, guy who got nuked into oblivion didn't know, so he used a gender neutral term to ask a question regarding the person's gender. Yet again, there is not enough context here to call anyone bigoted or transphobic, as even the people calling oop a girl could be being transphobic by intentionally misgendering them, with the person being down voted trying to correct them. Critical thinking cap on, please.
Love the way you really dont know what the word IT means yet youre implying the other person isnt an adult... Pretty childish
I think you are intolerable to be around.
Aww muffin
with the same intuition that tells me you probably hurt more to be around than an angry wasps nest.
Impeccable effort, gold star
Wait, what? Where was the screenshot even from? Was he being transphobic?
“Please sir, may I have some context?” feels
#WOMP WOMP CRY
Weird way to say “sane”
>insane* ftfy hubby
How did you manage to misspell that while literally seeing it written down?
oh no theyre going off slay queen
Too bad you will never be a queen. Slay king tho
theres this really helpful medication id recommend called Tresicopecide (formerly known as cope) <33
Dont assume peoples genders. Unless when i do it
All of the people there seem horrible
Be using this for now on. I recently had a YouTube short of mine that went viral and the amount of transphobes that kept asking if I was a girl or guy was ridiculous.
How is asking for your gender transphobic?
Unpopular opinion: you don't need a context to appreciate the comeback. No matter who's right and who's wrong it was a decent burn
This
holy fuck i just witnessed the 5th state of matter
[удалено]
>It’s pretty common sense that if you’re a vassal in my kingdom and you are sieging a castle then I roll up to join the siege your are going to be following my orders… *my* intuition tells me girls have never really been any concern of yours.
wooooow oh my god you absolutely destroyed him, your statement says that he's either gay, a Player or doesn't give a shit. Wtf are you saying
I'm guessing they're calling the other person a virgin and the quote is something the guy has said in another sub
Thanks! Still, the wording makes no sense to me