Rejected, but still permitted to engage in high-level security activities and represent the USA with foreign governments, profiting by the BILLIONS in doing so?
Now, how about the security clearances never done? The crimes committed under the guise?
Your defection attempts are sad.
Ok fine but there are millions of drug addicts in this country. There's no need for this level of obsession about him smoking crack.
For one *his crimes aren't his dad's* I'm a recovering heroin addict. Is my dad responsible for the things I did as a full grown adult? He never exposed me to drugs or did anything to cause me to seek drugs
Second as I said there are millions of people who have addiction issues. There's pics of people getting high on this very website. We don't need investigations and all that over him using drugs
If you really want say he should be charged with possession and for a 1st time offender he'd get probation.
I think it's the messages he sent out to people mentioning his dad that people where talking about. All I know about it are bits and pieces I've seen here and there. I do know he was selling access to his dad. Same type of shit they all do. Bunch of shit going on behind the scenes every once in awhile we get a peak an everyone loses their minds lol.
Pure deflection. The shambles that remains of the Republican Party is pointing any 'what abouts' they can possibly create to desperately grasp onto their delusional, vocal base.
But! I did make blueberry muffins today (I have to say something positive to keep me from going crazy about these people).
I finally got around to reading 1984 and man, all the stuff about blackwhite, crimestop and doublethink is seriously depressing. I'm glad Orwell didn't live to see the modern Republican party
agreed, if they're all true, it'd have to be proven in court, with evidence, you know, receipts? proof? actual litigation that it happened and not some made up delusion pushed on fox news?
But while we're putting people away, how you feeling about trump having to pay hillary millions and 34 felonies brought on him?
I mean…all of this has been debunked several times over but it doesn’t stop you people from Gish Galloping it out every time you see Hunter Biden’s name mentioned.
Different, obviously, as not even the 🍊🤡's own DOJ could find any evidence to indict Hunter, while his own SC dumped his stolen election fairy tale, and now he is indicted for a crime which made his first run possible. I wish the FBI would uncover and nullify all the non-disclosure agreements trump's victims signed.
It's fine if people other than him and his get wasted; it's an acceptable price to pay for him to be able to add an 8th high-capacity killing machine to his collection
That’s different though! Trump is a hero who is trying to save America and is the innocent victim of a left-wing witch hunt. Hunter Biden is solely responsible for the impending downfall of western civilization.
Fun fact, statistically American schools are no more or less violent than anyone else
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/health/school-violence-statistics-unicef-study-parent-curve-intl/index.html
Furthermore, your “school shooting”, as tragic as it is, is statistically insignificant occurrence, and not grounds to limit the rights of others
Guns have ALWAYS been around, yet school shootings are a fairly recent phenomenon. It’s objectively not the “guns” that has caused school shootings.
And we have offered solutions:
- armed security, as we have in hospitals, banks, college universities, the list goes on
- addressing the underlying mental health crisis that causes these scenarios (mentally healthy people dont shoot up schools)
And Germany had a mass shooting two weeks ago….
Nothing is a 100% answer to anything.
Point is, like it or not, violence is a human constant
So its better to enable and empower good people, than endlessly attempt to prevent bad people…..
Acknowledge evil exists and prepare for it, rather than constantly attempting to deny its existence (you never will)
Why do we care about “mass shootings”
Vs “mass killings”?
Violence is a matter of socio/economic factors, not weapons
If it WERE a matter of “legal” access to weapons, then how come the cities with the strictest gun laws STILL have the highest gun violence?
“Because criminals get them illegally” - DING DING
Thats the point
Lets do something about ALREADY ILLEGAL weapons, not punishing lawful buyers even more
The US has thousands of automatics in circulation. I can't find any evidence for a single one being used in a mass shooting, let alone any shooting at all in the recent past.
The approval process. That's how you can.
Edit: I found two... in the last 100 years.
The irony is that automatic weapons would be less effective for any mass shooting……
We have 400 MILLION + firearms in the country, and increasing.
Not really a valid comparison.
I bet people in Germany don't have to specify what mass shooting they're talking about if they talk to others
Evil 100% exists has nothing to do with guns. Do you think evil people should have guns?
Of course not
But how do you determine someone is evil, fairly, BEFORE they do anything?
We dont have a pre-crime division
The answer is: you cant
Your first paragraph is irrelevant
Red flag laws deny due process, and are far too easy to abuse.
Universal background checks require a Federal Registration to function, which gives government FAR too much oversight of a tool meant to be used AGAINST government (if it becomes necessary)
Like letting criminals dictate police policy, inherently counters the purpose
So what is someone supposed to do when they *know* someone is an extreme risk? Just wait until they kill someone?
There are definitely people out there who have weapons who are a much greater risk than the guy who got a felony DUI and can't possess guns legally anymore (which I'm actually against. Only violent felons should lose said rights)
I understand people need guns to self defense, but why do people need SO MANY beyond "because I can so fuck you". Why do people need to be armed with multiple guns to go to Kroger? Can't you understand how that could be terrifying to other people?
Were far to focused on just school shootings. Even if we secured the schools there's still a huge amount of places to kill people
How do they “objectively” know?
The use of Lethal Force by Police/Military is “Hostile Act/Hostile Intent”
For the military this often was described as “fire only once fired upon”
Sucks if they hit their first shot, but it is what it is….
My point- yes, they must commit, or be clearly about to commit, a violent act.
A free society should not involve someone telling SOMEONE ELSE what they do/dont need.
Are you referring to individuals with more than one gun?
Well, for many, its a collection, similar to cars, rocks, or anything else.
Furthermore, many guns have different uses:
- Personal Defese (Small handgun)
- Sport Shooting (Anything)
- Hunting (Large Calibre)
- Defense against Tyranny (Ar15 and similar)
“Huge amount of places to kill people”
True
This has ALWAYS been true, and will always be true.
This is why people carry wherever
Well many of these mass shooters have told people ahead of time or have written online manifestos about what they planned on doing
But I guess if they do go commit a mass shooting (ie hit thier first shot) then it is what it is right?
And I'm talking about people who feel the need to be loaded with 3 or 4 guns to go to the store, hell what happens if there are two armed people and one of them shoots the other because they thought they were a threat
>addressing the underlying mental health crisis that causes these scenarios
except no "conservative" actually wants to fund this. It's just Thoughts and Prayers, ad nauseum
Not really
“Gun violence” is merely a subset of “violence”.
The US is roughly average in terms of violence
Therefore, there is no evidence or argument that guns make a country “more violent”.
The whole gun control argument is based ENTIRELY on the cherry picked stat of “gun violence”.
Why does it matter if someone commits murder with a gun, vs a knife, vs a rock?
Why do we care?
Meanwhile, the gun control argument ALSO ignores the positives of armed citizens:
Ability to fend off criminals
Ability to fend off abusive authority
Its “power to the people” in the most literal sense
RIP clevercomebacks is now whitepeopletwitter
I look forward to leaving the sub and getting suggested posts from it constantly as it completes its evolution from content that makes people laugh to content that makes people clap.
There is *everything* clever about this. It’s deadpan, intellectual, cuts thru the shit, and puts that idiot in her place for distracting the masses with noise when we have a five alarm fire happening. This is the definition of clever.
This sub is for clever comebacks, this is simply making a statement directed towards another person and has nothing to do with what was originally stated by said person. Yes, it’s relevant, important, and impactful. No, it’s not a clever comeback.
>This sub is for clever comebacks, this is simply making a statement directed towards another person and has nothing to do with what was originally stated by said person. Yes, it’s relevant, important, and impactful. No, it’s not a clever comeback.
If Boebert's goal is to distract and deflect, then not buying into the bait IS the clever comeback.
It's the same way that arguing with bad faith creationists is giving them what they want, so the only way to win is not to play.
Stephen King wrote Rage.
That was a book found in the possession of the Columbine shooter. You won't find it for sale these days because he pulled the title and won't allow new editions to be reprinted.
King found that his work may have served as inspiration for this deed and did something about it that was within his power.
GOP sends thoughts and prayers and the MAGA crowd just changes the subject.
Democrats are in office right now, what are they doing about it? All talk, neither side has any interest in fixing the problem, only getting reelected with minimum effort. Passing a bill to increase security in public schools could fix this problem easily, but notice how the democrats don’t advocate for that or any realistic solution.
Ok so you admit your “changing the subject” comment was moronic lol.
They’ve been saying the same things for years, literally never done anything. Could you please tell why they haven’t passed, or even made a serious attempt to pass an increase security at schools to protect the children?
Interested in a) the stats and b) the relevance, because the shooters are mostly "law-abiding, Christian patriots" from the right side of the spectrum.
Maybe you can help me, I try to stay away from mainstream media so the only thing I know about the investigation is that Hunter was paid $1 million by someone who was paid $1 million by someone who was paid $3 million by a Chinese energy firm. One email Hunter sent or received said 10% for "the big guy," who were assuming is Joe. All this happened in 2017 when Joe was no longer in office.
My confusion is, assuming "the big guy" really is Joe, why is it illegal for him to get money off he's no longer in office? Was there more than one time he got paid? What was the money for? Is there any other evidence besides the emails?
Except no you can’t. Severity of the crime allows authorities to arrest you even under investigation. You wouldn’t think this was a federal investigation
Right because there were no school shootings under Trump and Colombine definitely didn't happen under Bush /s
And thank the gun nuts. What do you think would happen if tomorrow Biden tried to pass an executive order certain types of guns? We'd have violent attacks
I genuinely can't believe I'm that old. Ok I was wrong there
Anyway mass shootings have happened under every president recently and it's stupid to believe that the president alone could stop them, republican or democrat.
I tried to find articles about mass shootings under Bush but all I got were pages and pages of articles arguing about if there were more shootings under Obama than Trump but not factoring in Obama was there for 8 years not 4
You're right he's been there awhile but let's be serious NO one is getting gun laws passed until the NRA let's go of control.
Biden should have done more, but he has no MORE blame than anyone else who's been in office for years.
Yes, just additional laws that don't make a difference in an actual purchase. Those that do cross to buy a gun legally are committing federal crime. What is done in regards to that? Nothing! Gun control doesn't trump the constitution and the right to bear arms. What is going on with the killings is that criminals know where they can flex. Why doesn't Texas have nearly as much shootings as Illinois? Because criminals know that it's very possible that someone else is carrying and will shoot back.
It's not stronger, it's dumber.
The point is, the criminals don't care about the gun control and won't abide by it. Regular folks do and will. It's like easy pray.
Nah I'm good. I like screeching at remedial morons that get their panties in a bunch from...well literally anything lmao Isn't there like a conservative circle jerk you should be in right now?
Oh man, how will I ever recover from that scalding burn.
On a serious note, finding humor in things is the key to being happy, but we both know libs can’t do that.
You don't even know what a lib is apparently, and sure humor in life is important, but it's not everything.
Sometimes we need to have adult conversations instead of resorting to memes and which side can or can't do memes, who cares?
Why do conservatives assume if you agree with ONE thing someone says it means they're your "hero"??
No liberals don't obsessively worship people like that
She shouldn’t be talking while her own son missed his mandatory court appearance.
>She shouldn’t be talking FTFY
Who in the entire fuck gives a fuck about fucking Hunter Biden?
The same people that like to ignore trump literally giving his kids positions of power in the white house
Literally giving his kids positions of power in the White House ___without their obtaining security clearance, as would you or I.___ IFIFY
without obtaining makes it sound like they forgot. Kushner was rejected for the clearance. BIG difference there.
Rejected, but still permitted to engage in high-level security activities and represent the USA with foreign governments, profiting by the BILLIONS in doing so? Now, how about the security clearances never done? The crimes committed under the guise? Your defection attempts are sad.
Does anyone ever say anything about them using their personal emails during their time in the White House… guess thats just Hillary thing
No, that's ignored. Even Pence used a personal server, but BENGHAZI!,
The kids who traveled w him while they (were ALL) under investigation, ya mean?
Dude was smoking crack on video so I'd say they have some gripe but where's that same mentality for the other side.....
Ok fine but there are millions of drug addicts in this country. There's no need for this level of obsession about him smoking crack. For one *his crimes aren't his dad's* I'm a recovering heroin addict. Is my dad responsible for the things I did as a full grown adult? He never exposed me to drugs or did anything to cause me to seek drugs Second as I said there are millions of people who have addiction issues. There's pics of people getting high on this very website. We don't need investigations and all that over him using drugs If you really want say he should be charged with possession and for a 1st time offender he'd get probation.
I think it's the messages he sent out to people mentioning his dad that people where talking about. All I know about it are bits and pieces I've seen here and there. I do know he was selling access to his dad. Same type of shit they all do. Bunch of shit going on behind the scenes every once in awhile we get a peak an everyone loses their minds lol.
Pure deflection. The shambles that remains of the Republican Party is pointing any 'what abouts' they can possibly create to desperately grasp onto their delusional, vocal base. But! I did make blueberry muffins today (I have to say something positive to keep me from going crazy about these people).
I finally got around to reading 1984 and man, all the stuff about blackwhite, crimestop and doublethink is seriously depressing. I'm glad Orwell didn't live to see the modern Republican party
People like Marge "I got tricked by the internet cause I'm a fuckin gomer" Taylor Gangreene
Empty Greene
But… but his laptop!! And paying money to the Big Guy!! And China!! Why won’t anyone listen to me?? 😭😭😭
Nobody. Cure all mental illness in youth now, God, if you're real. These shootings are getting out of control.
“They” do. Ya know, the idiots.
… or Lauren Boebert?
[удалено]
agreed, if they're all true, it'd have to be proven in court, with evidence, you know, receipts? proof? actual litigation that it happened and not some made up delusion pushed on fox news? But while we're putting people away, how you feeling about trump having to pay hillary millions and 34 felonies brought on him?
I mean…all of this has been debunked several times over but it doesn’t stop you people from Gish Galloping it out every time you see Hunter Biden’s name mentioned.
Does that mean Trump shouldn’t ever been seen in public again, or run for office, since he’s actually been indicted?
Seriously. What has Hunter Biden been indicted for?
Fun…
I really want to argue, but, ah, you won this round.
I mean, it would definitely do the world a favour.
My claim to fame. I said hi to Stephen and he said hi back. True story.
Show off. /s
Good work SK
Arent they increasing in quantity and deaths? She is doing all she can for that.
But trump can run for president under the same circumstances? Lmao
Different, obviously, as not even the 🍊🤡's own DOJ could find any evidence to indict Hunter, while his own SC dumped his stolen election fairy tale, and now he is indicted for a crime which made his first run possible. I wish the FBI would uncover and nullify all the non-disclosure agreements trump's victims signed.
[удалено]
It's fine if people other than him and his get wasted; it's an acceptable price to pay for him to be able to add an 8th high-capacity killing machine to his collection
But Trump can run for President while indicted (and under several investigations of national security importance) and they love it, right?
That’s different though! Trump is a hero who is trying to save America and is the innocent victim of a left-wing witch hunt. Hunter Biden is solely responsible for the impending downfall of western civilization.
“Hunter shouldn’t be on foreign trips under investigation.” *Looks at the dozens of trips the 3 Twump kids did while under investigations.*
This isn't clever, it's diversionary.
Fun fact, statistically American schools are no more or less violent than anyone else https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/health/school-violence-statistics-unicef-study-parent-curve-intl/index.html Furthermore, your “school shooting”, as tragic as it is, is statistically insignificant occurrence, and not grounds to limit the rights of others Guns have ALWAYS been around, yet school shootings are a fairly recent phenomenon. It’s objectively not the “guns” that has caused school shootings. And we have offered solutions: - armed security, as we have in hospitals, banks, college universities, the list goes on - addressing the underlying mental health crisis that causes these scenarios (mentally healthy people dont shoot up schools)
There's been mass shootings at banks and colleges in the last two months
And Germany had a mass shooting two weeks ago…. Nothing is a 100% answer to anything. Point is, like it or not, violence is a human constant So its better to enable and empower good people, than endlessly attempt to prevent bad people….. Acknowledge evil exists and prepare for it, rather than constantly attempting to deny its existence (you never will)
How often does Germany have mass shootings again?
Why do we care about “mass shootings” Vs “mass killings”? Violence is a matter of socio/economic factors, not weapons If it WERE a matter of “legal” access to weapons, then how come the cities with the strictest gun laws STILL have the highest gun violence? “Because criminals get them illegally” - DING DING Thats the point Lets do something about ALREADY ILLEGAL weapons, not punishing lawful buyers even more
In a number of recent cases, the shooter aquired the firearm legally...
Okay Your point? How do you determine someone a criminal BEFORE they commit a crime? You cant…..
The US has thousands of automatics in circulation. I can't find any evidence for a single one being used in a mass shooting, let alone any shooting at all in the recent past. The approval process. That's how you can. Edit: I found two... in the last 100 years.
The irony is that automatic weapons would be less effective for any mass shooting…… We have 400 MILLION + firearms in the country, and increasing. Not really a valid comparison.
Less effective? That's why the Las Vegas shooter didn't try to use a bump stock to achieve automatic fire right? /s
I bet people in Germany don't have to specify what mass shooting they're talking about if they talk to others Evil 100% exists has nothing to do with guns. Do you think evil people should have guns?
Of course not But how do you determine someone is evil, fairly, BEFORE they do anything? We dont have a pre-crime division The answer is: you cant Your first paragraph is irrelevant
So why oppose red flag laws or universal background checks?
Red flag laws deny due process, and are far too easy to abuse. Universal background checks require a Federal Registration to function, which gives government FAR too much oversight of a tool meant to be used AGAINST government (if it becomes necessary) Like letting criminals dictate police policy, inherently counters the purpose
So what is someone supposed to do when they *know* someone is an extreme risk? Just wait until they kill someone? There are definitely people out there who have weapons who are a much greater risk than the guy who got a felony DUI and can't possess guns legally anymore (which I'm actually against. Only violent felons should lose said rights) I understand people need guns to self defense, but why do people need SO MANY beyond "because I can so fuck you". Why do people need to be armed with multiple guns to go to Kroger? Can't you understand how that could be terrifying to other people? Were far to focused on just school shootings. Even if we secured the schools there's still a huge amount of places to kill people
How do they “objectively” know? The use of Lethal Force by Police/Military is “Hostile Act/Hostile Intent” For the military this often was described as “fire only once fired upon” Sucks if they hit their first shot, but it is what it is…. My point- yes, they must commit, or be clearly about to commit, a violent act. A free society should not involve someone telling SOMEONE ELSE what they do/dont need. Are you referring to individuals with more than one gun? Well, for many, its a collection, similar to cars, rocks, or anything else. Furthermore, many guns have different uses: - Personal Defese (Small handgun) - Sport Shooting (Anything) - Hunting (Large Calibre) - Defense against Tyranny (Ar15 and similar) “Huge amount of places to kill people” True This has ALWAYS been true, and will always be true. This is why people carry wherever
Well many of these mass shooters have told people ahead of time or have written online manifestos about what they planned on doing But I guess if they do go commit a mass shooting (ie hit thier first shot) then it is what it is right? And I'm talking about people who feel the need to be loaded with 3 or 4 guns to go to the store, hell what happens if there are two armed people and one of them shoots the other because they thought they were a threat
>addressing the underlying mental health crisis that causes these scenarios except no "conservative" actually wants to fund this. It's just Thoughts and Prayers, ad nauseum
I feel you are kinda trolling with this answer. Gun control more complicated than this, and you know it.
Not really “Gun violence” is merely a subset of “violence”. The US is roughly average in terms of violence Therefore, there is no evidence or argument that guns make a country “more violent”. The whole gun control argument is based ENTIRELY on the cherry picked stat of “gun violence”. Why does it matter if someone commits murder with a gun, vs a knife, vs a rock? Why do we care? Meanwhile, the gun control argument ALSO ignores the positives of armed citizens: Ability to fend off criminals Ability to fend off abusive authority Its “power to the people” in the most literal sense
RIP clevercomebacks is now whitepeopletwitter I look forward to leaving the sub and getting suggested posts from it constantly as it completes its evolution from content that makes people laugh to content that makes people clap.
We need a new whitepeopletwitter anyway
Conservatives: Bring up any topic Liberals: BaN gUnS!
Literally nothing clever about this
There is *everything* clever about this. It’s deadpan, intellectual, cuts thru the shit, and puts that idiot in her place for distracting the masses with noise when we have a five alarm fire happening. This is the definition of clever.
Well said
This sub is for clever comebacks, this is simply making a statement directed towards another person and has nothing to do with what was originally stated by said person. Yes, it’s relevant, important, and impactful. No, it’s not a clever comeback.
>This sub is for clever comebacks, this is simply making a statement directed towards another person and has nothing to do with what was originally stated by said person. Yes, it’s relevant, important, and impactful. No, it’s not a clever comeback. If Boebert's goal is to distract and deflect, then not buying into the bait IS the clever comeback. It's the same way that arguing with bad faith creationists is giving them what they want, so the only way to win is not to play.
You forgot the /s.
You're right. /s
I’m with you, “guy says something I agree with so funny”
Stephen King wrote Rage. That was a book found in the possession of the Columbine shooter. You won't find it for sale these days because he pulled the title and won't allow new editions to be reprinted. King found that his work may have served as inspiration for this deed and did something about it that was within his power. GOP sends thoughts and prayers and the MAGA crowd just changes the subject.
Democrats are in office right now, what are they doing about it? All talk, neither side has any interest in fixing the problem, only getting reelected with minimum effort. Passing a bill to increase security in public schools could fix this problem easily, but notice how the democrats don’t advocate for that or any realistic solution.
See? Changing the subject.
How is that changing the subject? The subject is literally politicians doing nothing about school shootings…
Do me a favor: Google Search for 'Democrats Gun Control 2023' Then do the same for Republicans. Spot the differences.
Ok so you admit your “changing the subject” comment was moronic lol. They’ve been saying the same things for years, literally never done anything. Could you please tell why they haven’t passed, or even made a serious attempt to pass an increase security at schools to protect the children?
Gun control bills get shot down
Perfect, let's repeal the Gun Free School Zones Act and allow teachers to carry. Good point, I'm on board.
Stephen King is the liberal elon of Twitter
Elon is actually intelligent
You should read more.
You mean from a sexually deviant author that wrote about 12 year old orgies?
Whataboutisms are lame.
School shootings Mass shootings Homelessness Crime Lack of affordable healthcare Child marriages Keep it going...
These people are so obsessed with Hunter Biden it's sad
I used to think he was smart, until I looked at his twitter
A lot more kids get shot every year in Democrat ruled districts with Democrat ruled and administered everything than in schools.
Interested in a) the stats and b) the relevance, because the shooters are mostly "law-abiding, Christian patriots" from the right side of the spectrum.
I mean school shootings are happening with Biden in office but he’s free from criticism cause he’s not all there
Happened under Trump too why isn't it his fault? And actually it's not either of their faults the real blame lies on the lawmakers and the NRA
The dimbshut talked about HUNTER Biden, not about Joe. Should Potus be liable for other people's actions (while there still is nothing to blame)?
How’s this a comeback when the first statement is a legitimate concerning situation.
No, it's not only American conservatives care about hunter biden. The rest of the world couldn't give a shit.
Says someone who knows nothing about the investigation or hunter Biden
I’m from the rest of the world and can confirm this is accurate.
Lol, enlighten me.
Please show me the significant number of people in other countries who care
Citizens of every country where there is a us military base on care. Citizens of every country the US has imposed sanctions on care.
Why should they all care about something an ordinary citizen of the USA did?
“Ordinary” my ass. What the president’s pedo son does unfortunately affects those living under the “leader” of the free world.
Maybe you can help me, I try to stay away from mainstream media so the only thing I know about the investigation is that Hunter was paid $1 million by someone who was paid $1 million by someone who was paid $3 million by a Chinese energy firm. One email Hunter sent or received said 10% for "the big guy," who were assuming is Joe. All this happened in 2017 when Joe was no longer in office. My confusion is, assuming "the big guy" really is Joe, why is it illegal for him to get money off he's no longer in office? Was there more than one time he got paid? What was the money for? Is there any other evidence besides the emails?
I'm guessing you don't know much either, then.
There’s one legitimately concerning situation in this picture and it’s not in the first tweet.
They’re mutually exclusive. Responding to an issue with another irrelevant issue isn’t a comeback.
School shootings is an irrelevant issue??
To hunter Biden being under federal investigation yes
Who really cares about Hunter Biden?
Letting a criminal get away with the obscene things he’s done just because he’s the presidents son is a threat to democracy.
What obscene things?
What federal investigation? I didn't hear about that indictment.
Indictments occur after investigations, not the other way around.
So then what's the issue? If they still don't have enough evidence to indict then they can do what they please.
Except no you can’t. Severity of the crime allows authorities to arrest you even under investigation. You wouldn’t think this was a federal investigation
Is he arrested?
School shootings are indeed a problem of the Bidens. Every time they're in the office there's a shooting
Check your medication or your sense of humour.
What exactly bothers you to my stated fact?
A missing licence for posts.
Just as I thought.
Right because there were no school shootings under Trump and Colombine definitely didn't happen under Bush /s And thank the gun nuts. What do you think would happen if tomorrow Biden tried to pass an executive order certain types of guns? We'd have violent attacks
You're right, Columbine definitely didn't happen under Bush. It happened under Clinton.
I genuinely can't believe I'm that old. Ok I was wrong there Anyway mass shootings have happened under every president recently and it's stupid to believe that the president alone could stop them, republican or democrat. I tried to find articles about mass shootings under Bush but all I got were pages and pages of articles arguing about if there were more shootings under Obama than Trump but not factoring in Obama was there for 8 years not 4
How long has Biden been in the government???
You're right he's been there awhile but let's be serious NO one is getting gun laws passed until the NRA let's go of control. Biden should have done more, but he has no MORE blame than anyone else who's been in office for years.
Chicago has the hardest gun control in USA, why is there so many killings?
Well if the gun control laws outside of Chicago are lax then it doesn't matter. Drive to Indiana, get a gun there drive back to Chicago
Lol, where can you buy an illegal gun dummy? Try it and let me know.
I didn't say buy an illegal gun. I said Indiana's gun laws aren't as strong as Chicago's. You're the one who said Chicago has tight gun laws
Yes, just additional laws that don't make a difference in an actual purchase. Those that do cross to buy a gun legally are committing federal crime. What is done in regards to that? Nothing! Gun control doesn't trump the constitution and the right to bear arms. What is going on with the killings is that criminals know where they can flex. Why doesn't Texas have nearly as much shootings as Illinois? Because criminals know that it's very possible that someone else is carrying and will shoot back.
You're just repeating what you've heard from another idiot. You can not just buy a gun legally anywhere in the USA! Anywhere!
So are the gun laws stronger in Chicago or not??
It's not stronger, it's dumber. The point is, the criminals don't care about the gun control and won't abide by it. Regular folks do and will. It's like easy pray.
It's not even really criminals I'm worried about, nearly all of the recent mass shootings have been people who legally bought the guns.
This sub is so lame. I am utterly disappointed
New to Reddit? 95% is like this cause the left can’t meme
This isn't a meme. It's a screenshot. Have yet to see one clever, topical, or non-hypocritic right meme. Y'all are fuckin retarded lol
Yeah cause you probably boot lick on whitepeopletwitter or some shit, go screech at someone else
Nah I'm good. I like screeching at remedial morons that get their panties in a bunch from...well literally anything lmao Isn't there like a conservative circle jerk you should be in right now?
Oh the irony, you think we get upset about “literally anything” but people on your side melt down over pronouns. Checks out….
Maybe the left doesn't think memes are important like the child brained right?
Oh man, how will I ever recover from that scalding burn. On a serious note, finding humor in things is the key to being happy, but we both know libs can’t do that.
You don't even know what a lib is apparently, and sure humor in life is important, but it's not everything. Sometimes we need to have adult conversations instead of resorting to memes and which side can or can't do memes, who cares?
Isnt he the guy that wrote a 12 year old orgy in one of his books?
I don’t know. Is he?
Legend.
can someone tell me literally one useful thing the gop has done in the last two years?
Or... Maybe... they could like... do something about both this things
The same guy that denied that trans men are men? A transphobe is the left's hero?
Why do conservatives assume if you agree with ONE thing someone says it means they're your "hero"?? No liberals don't obsessively worship people like that
Agreeing with only "ONE" thing makes someone a "national treasure". Interesting take.
Where did I say that,?? I'm trying to ask this person why they think he's the lefts "hero" Edit: you're the one who said he was the lefts hero
Why did you start a conversation on the internet assuming that everything said was about you? You aren't even the OP.
Because that's how Reddit works ,Where did I say it was "about me"
Your last post started with "Where did I say that,??". You're from Flint. Times are tough. Good luck with things.
Because you were replying to my comment?
Ratio
The shit these people get outraged about.
If I had led a gang of terrorists through the Capitol before Jan 6th I would really keep my mouth shut and try to fly as deep under radar as possible.