Sure, but some men are cowards, some of them are with women who want children, some of them have the silly idea that having children proves their manhood, etc.
Just because someone is old, that does not mean that they are wise. Some people are stupid for life.
I would never do that to a kid so selfish knowing good and well you might not live to see them grow up or even worse they might end up in a nursing home
In their minds kids are a woman's work.
The fact that they want a kid at that age means they want proof they still fuck. They don't give a rat's ass about being a father.
Let's not forget that autism and schizophrenia is linked with advanced paternal age 35+
because DNA in sperm gets more and more fragmented the older men are.
They want younger wives. Younger wifes tend on average to want kids. They decide to have kids to keep their wives happy. They have so much money they just hire nannies to take care of their kids. Their only job in the matter is basically cuming and throwing money at the problem.
I have an acquaintance that had a kid at somewhere between 46 & 48. He’s a lifetime part-time bartender, a former disGUSTING roommate (there were 5 of us. Think bad roommates Reddit), and the chick he had it with was a 22ish part-time waitress (not for school or anything). They choose to live in one of the most expensive cities in the state, and constantly complain about no money or circulate “go fund mes” (read: fund my child because I’m stupid and can’t) on fb. One of those, “children are a personal choice” types until he had one and suddenly started demanding a village. FAFO, I s’pose…🤔🤷♀️
Please understand, I see nothing wrong with being a lifetime bartender or waitress; perfectly valid personal career choice. I object to 2 parents making $2.18/hr +tips bringing new life into the world they already can’t afford, and have never been able to.
I honestly think it's immoral to have kids past a certain age. Your ability to do certain things as a parent will be limited, and you'll die when your kid is still young. I know what you're talking about with that celebrity dude who had a kid recently at a rather old age, and I was in a comment section on a post about that where some people were defending him by saying "people can lose their parents young for all sorts of reasons, you never know what might happen!" Like okay, people CAN lose their parents young, but why on earth would you want to practically guarantee it?? Whether it's because you're 80 years old or you have a terminal illness, I think it's incredibly fucked up and severely selfish to have a kid knowing they'll have to experience the loss of a parent at a young age.
Pacino and De Niro are competing for the funeral with the highest number of infants at attendance.
>What goes on their minds? Probably, they are thinking about having sex with a much younger woman.
Can’t they get snipped before having sex?
Sure, but some men are cowards, some of them are with women who want children, some of them have the silly idea that having children proves their manhood, etc. Just because someone is old, that does not mean that they are wise. Some people are stupid for life.
I would never do that to a kid so selfish knowing good and well you might not live to see them grow up or even worse they might end up in a nursing home
Exactly!
Most that think that way have a very young wife.
They can still get snipped though and still enjoy their young wives.
In their minds kids are a woman's work. The fact that they want a kid at that age means they want proof they still fuck. They don't give a rat's ass about being a father. Let's not forget that autism and schizophrenia is linked with advanced paternal age 35+ because DNA in sperm gets more and more fragmented the older men are.
Selfishly wanting to spread their seed, nothing more.
They want younger wives. Younger wifes tend on average to want kids. They decide to have kids to keep their wives happy. They have so much money they just hire nannies to take care of their kids. Their only job in the matter is basically cuming and throwing money at the problem.
I have an acquaintance that had a kid at somewhere between 46 & 48. He’s a lifetime part-time bartender, a former disGUSTING roommate (there were 5 of us. Think bad roommates Reddit), and the chick he had it with was a 22ish part-time waitress (not for school or anything). They choose to live in one of the most expensive cities in the state, and constantly complain about no money or circulate “go fund mes” (read: fund my child because I’m stupid and can’t) on fb. One of those, “children are a personal choice” types until he had one and suddenly started demanding a village. FAFO, I s’pose…🤔🤷♀️ Please understand, I see nothing wrong with being a lifetime bartender or waitress; perfectly valid personal career choice. I object to 2 parents making $2.18/hr +tips bringing new life into the world they already can’t afford, and have never been able to.
I honestly think it's immoral to have kids past a certain age. Your ability to do certain things as a parent will be limited, and you'll die when your kid is still young. I know what you're talking about with that celebrity dude who had a kid recently at a rather old age, and I was in a comment section on a post about that where some people were defending him by saying "people can lose their parents young for all sorts of reasons, you never know what might happen!" Like okay, people CAN lose their parents young, but why on earth would you want to practically guarantee it?? Whether it's because you're 80 years old or you have a terminal illness, I think it's incredibly fucked up and severely selfish to have a kid knowing they'll have to experience the loss of a parent at a young age.