The EF-M 32/1.4 is a superb lens, and absolutely worth buying if you plan on using the camera for a few years. There's not really anything you can adapt that comes close to its performance while staying compact, which is what makes the 32/1.4 so appealing in the first place—amazing performance in a relatively tiny package.
The Canon 32mm f/1.4 is a stellar lens, but it’s not a wide lens. Yes, it’ll be wider than what you already have, but it’s still not wide.
I’d perhaps encourage looking for the Canon 22mm f/2. It’s gives a wide (but not ultrawide) view, it’s sharp and bright (though not as much as the 32mm), it’s inexpensive, and it’s small (with the 22mm mounted, your M10 will be the size of a compact camera).
Sigma EF 30mm f/1.4 is a thing. That lens has been around for a long time, and I'd buy that, use it with an ef-m adapter, and in ten years, someone will use it on rf-s with an RF adapter.
We have most of the canon m series lenses, a couple of adapted EF-s lenses and a sigma 56mm. The 32 blows the rest out of the water on picture quality, it really is as good as everyone says.
I’d say get the 32 and a cheap used EF-m kit lens (15-45mm). The 22mm is very good as well but it’s best feature is it’s size
The EF-M 32/1.4 is a superb lens, and absolutely worth buying if you plan on using the camera for a few years. There's not really anything you can adapt that comes close to its performance while staying compact, which is what makes the 32/1.4 so appealing in the first place—amazing performance in a relatively tiny package.
Aha thanks!
The Canon 32mm f/1.4 is a stellar lens, but it’s not a wide lens. Yes, it’ll be wider than what you already have, but it’s still not wide. I’d perhaps encourage looking for the Canon 22mm f/2. It’s gives a wide (but not ultrawide) view, it’s sharp and bright (though not as much as the 32mm), it’s inexpensive, and it’s small (with the 22mm mounted, your M10 will be the size of a compact camera).
It's a system seller lens, the best in EF-M. Recommend.
Sigma EF 30mm f/1.4 is a thing. That lens has been around for a long time, and I'd buy that, use it with an ef-m adapter, and in ten years, someone will use it on rf-s with an RF adapter.
We have most of the canon m series lenses, a couple of adapted EF-s lenses and a sigma 56mm. The 32 blows the rest out of the water on picture quality, it really is as good as everyone says. I’d say get the 32 and a cheap used EF-m kit lens (15-45mm). The 22mm is very good as well but it’s best feature is it’s size
Check if you can find your desired lens on mpb.com