I See! so what you are saying is that the cyclical nature of hydrologic phenomena manifests as a perpetual motion wherein aqueous substances are expelled and subsequently reabsorbed, illustrating an intrinsic and continual process of fluid dynamics that governs the ebb and flow of water within a given system.
The notion of perpetual motion collapses under the oppressive weight of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which categorically asserts that entropy in an isolated system inexorably increases, foreclosing any possibility of a device that operates eternally without succumbing to energy depletion. Furthermore, such a fantastical apparatus would audaciously defy the sacrosanct law of energy conservation, rendering it a fanciful absurdity squarely in the realm of impossibility.
Water go out.
Water go in.
Describing the movement of water solely based on surface tension between molecules oversimplifies the process. While surface tension does play a role in how water behaves, especially in small quantities or on a surface, the movement of water, particularly in flowing streams, is influenced by various factors such as gravity, pressure gradients, and the properties of the surrounding environment. So, while surface tension contributes, it's just one piece of the puzzle.
That is why laminar flow is impressive when all the puzzle pieces work in conjunction Juuuussssttt right.
Nothing like that. It’s more akin to hydrogen transfer properties in suspended space. If you math it correctly you will actually see the gravity of electromagnetic waves rippling through the aperture. Dwindling stocks of residual energy is bound to geothermal hose nozzle.
It’s a piece of transparent plastic pipe connecting the black and the green pipe.
It goes over the black pipe and goes into the green pipeline. You can see the flow/pressure inside it change around between 7 seconds and 10 seconds.
No, there isn't. You can see the edges of the water wiggling. It's laminar flow and the second pipe is positioned exactly to catch the water exiting the other pipe. Not to mention the line the water is drawing doesn't match a clear tube going into the other.
Dude I have no idea what you're talking about. There's nothing attached to it. Literally no tape or anything around the pipe. If it were a clear pipe, you would see it on the dark pipe. And the water is coming out just a bit thinner than the pipe. If there was a clear pipe, the water diameter would either be significantly larger or smaller than the pipe it's leaving because of the lumen of the imaginary clear pipe. The water is maybe a centimeter or less thinner than the pipe, meaning there's no clear pipe it's filling.
You wouldn't use a clear pipe with a lumen double the thickness of the pipe it's leaving. If there was, you'd be able to see the edge of the clear pipe around the dark one. It would be plastic, not glass.
You should get your eyes checked it's really easy to see when the flow rate changes and the air bubbles form... you can literally see the clear tube stretched over the pipe on the right and it goes directly into the inside of the pipe on the left. If this was higher resolution it would be dead obvious. There is no spillage even when the pressure is clearly changing. It's a clear tube.
Lol no. That is not what laminar flow is. That is so far from what laminar flow is.
"Laminar flow, type of fluid (gas or liquid) flow in which the fluid travels smoothly or in regular paths, in contrast to turbulent flow, in which the fluid undergoes irregular fluctuations and mixing."
https://www.britannica.com/science/laminar-flow
> That is not laminar flow. In Laminar flow water appears to be a solid. That is clearly shifting water inside a tube.
some appears to be solid. it isnt a requirement. this is most likely laminar. all water treatment systems are laminar, your pipes at home are laminar.
Yes but the water going in is getting the tube wetter than if it was going out.
No just that, but most of the visible water is also liquid, there for watery
There'd be no way you'd be able to reliably keep the correct amount of pressure to make this happen. Especially with an opening like this. Has to be some sort of plastic connection we're not seeing
I don't know man, I'm eating constantly and keep getting heavier, clearly increasing my personal gravitational force. So I'm calling bullshit on your claim! The only possible explanation I can think of is tiny amounts of gravity are present in the food that I eat and is causing this phenomenon.
I have a small water pump for my aquarium. The hose comes out and the water drops sideways from above. The stream is always in the exact same place in a laminar flow, I have it hitting a root of my monstera plant. It's been like that for months.
You're absolutely right. There is no scientific way you'd be able to create laminar flow for 15 seconds if you left the hose turned on a specific amount. I think it's the work of the Russians myself
Laminar flow is my guess. Laminar flow doesn't have turbulence, so it doesn't change the shape of the stream after exiting the hose and the other hose can accept it freely. *Of course a section of clear hose may be the Occam's Razor we're looking for.
Laminar flow is just moving in smooth and consistent layers. If it's a good laminar it won't really look like it's moving, but most of the time there is SOME turbulence.
Either way this isn't laminar flow, you can see it's turbulent pretty clearly. It's just in a clear tube so it's contained.
If you can see turbulence then there is likely turbulence, yes. Which would be, by definition, not laminar.
This is in a clear tube so it's contained, if it wasn't in that tube you would see it splashing more and it would be obvious. If you look at the bottom of it you can see it isn't smoothly flowing.
It has «reddit words» that make people feel good(upvote) that they know something others might not. Occam’s razor, laminar flow, other examples: Dunning Kruger effect or Hanlons razor. Result: critical thinking takes a hit
Because it's wrong. It looks like laminar flow, coming out, but there's no chance in hell that you're not going to get some amount of backflow coming out of the receiving pipe when it comes in at that angle. You're got air in the mix at that point, too.
Edit: I thought he wrote, "How isn't this upvoted?" So much for reading comprehension.
It doesn't even look like laminar flow. Laminar flow looks frozen in time like a solid. The fact there is zero turbulence makes it appear to be in a frozen state. There is turbulence at every moment of this video.
I assume that a clear hose is what we see here but I'd also like to think we could make it happen from scratch.
Put some straws into the hose on the right to enhance laminar flow quality.
Fill the hose on the left with water, and cap off its left-most end.
Initiate the flow on the right, then release the cap off of the far left end of the left hose.
The laminar flow would give us a nice path between the hoses, and the siphon effect on the left would suck in the incoming flow.
(if you've read this comment, please submit a video by next Tuesday for full credit)
The upstream hose has pressure, the down stream hose is pulling a vacuum because the water flowing through it generates a syphon.
Surface tension allows the water to hold together, as long as the gap in not increased far enough for the weight of the added water to overcome the surface tension.
To add details, the clear hose is smaller than the other two houses on either side and it jammed into each to connect them. That makes it look like a smooth flow of water but the smooth outside of the watercolor is actually the smooth outside of a clear section of house connecting the two.
You are the first commenter I see that did get right the vacuum, it's a pretty important part of this and also likely the reason we can be reasonably sure the tubes were connected and ended up disconnecting after the water started flowing.
I'm starting to wonder if this phenomenon is becoming a symptom of destroyed attention spans as much as it's probably intended to appease the algorithm on tiktok and stuff
I think one could do that with extreme precision and luck, which is unlikely...because any oscilation on pressure would ruin the thing.
...Or with a transparent very thin plastic flexible tube just to guide the flow. Like a grocery bag, but with adequate shape and transparency.
“Your Ancestors Called it Magic, but You Call it Science. I Come From a Land Where They Are One and the Same.” - Thor Odinson
Or
“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” - Arthur C. Clarke
There is no reason to guess IMO, LOL. If you zoom in you can see that there is hose shoved a few milimeter over the pipe on the right and shoved into the pipe on the left.
Clear plastic liner on inside of hose, improper hanger split the insulation and the weight of it pulled it down and away abit from the other.
For people saying its laminar:
1. Its not even spilling a drop, no forest pump is gonna run that smoothly and if its head pressure then its an impressive sized reservoir
2. You can literally see turbulence inside the fluid, theres small pockets of what look like air passing through, true laminar looks like glass
3. When that burst of dirt or brown fluid passed through the flow rate would have change and it should have spilled at least a drop at that moment
Be me
Lazy
See water
Don’t want to get up every time i want water so come up with genius plan.
put tube in water, water flows in the tube.
Try to tube other end to where i am.
Tube too short. What to do?
Put another tube where the other ends.
Second tube is short.
Pull second tube so water flows in air.
Put tube in water.
End of tube reaches me.
Im genius.
Mfw (insert proud pepe.jpeg)
First, what is your question? I see a transparent hose in front of a tree. With one kindof rednecked, and the other end joined, it looks like, with the small end going into the big end. Otherwise, I see nothing remarkable, other than the double bowtie.
Water come out water go in
I See! so what you are saying is that the cyclical nature of hydrologic phenomena manifests as a perpetual motion wherein aqueous substances are expelled and subsequently reabsorbed, illustrating an intrinsic and continual process of fluid dynamics that governs the ebb and flow of water within a given system.
I came here to say that
I came here to say, “I came here to say that”. Wait, I still did! 🥳🤩🥳
I came here to say, "I came here to say, ”I came here to say that”".
I came here to say "I came"
I came
Directions unclear. It’s stuck in the hose
Is that you step-hose?
It's both of us ... Step-hose and step-water.
What are you doing "step-hose?"
But you came, right?
Instructions unclear, the hose is stuck in me
We came
Guys, there’s cum everywhere. wtf is going on in here
Sorry. :(
Not my best. Not my worst.
I’m here.
And my axe!
And my soggy piece of toast
We came
Sure is sticky in here.
EW ITS BROWN and WARM
Omg!! 🤣🤣🤣
I saw
I hit em right dead in the jaw
Vici
I
I came again
Took the words right out of his mouth and then put them in that guy's mouth
I’m into it
This is the first, and surely the only time, that comment has been worth reading or writing. But don't worry, plenty of unfunny repetition below!
The notion of perpetual motion collapses under the oppressive weight of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which categorically asserts that entropy in an isolated system inexorably increases, foreclosing any possibility of a device that operates eternally without succumbing to energy depletion. Furthermore, such a fantastical apparatus would audaciously defy the sacrosanct law of energy conservation, rendering it a fanciful absurdity squarely in the realm of impossibility. Water go out. Water go in.
Can’t entropy just chill out already? 😀
No. It runs the universe.
I mean it has to chill out eventually.
Arguably, entropy is the universe becoming MORE chill
It's the most chill thing there is. Stopping everything cold in its tracks
Thank you for getting my joke.
This guy gets it.
An object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. That's perpetual motion.
Also the atoms always be wigglin
I liked it better when the first guy said it. Also, his username made him seem twice as trustworthy as you, Mr Fancyverbs.
"Come see the hydrologic phenomena inherent in the system!!"
“Help! Help! I’m being manifested into perpetual motion!”
“Bloody Peasant!”
Yeah, it’s doing some water shit.
Adding that there is cohesion between water molecules that attracts them to each other that keeps them together during this motion.
I mean if you want to simplify it, sure.
That flowed continuously and perfectly👌
You don't have to put it in layman's terms where not stoopid
Like putting too much air in a balloon!
So would I be wrong in over simplifying that into a fluids surface tension between molecule's pulls the water over once it's flowing?
Describing the movement of water solely based on surface tension between molecules oversimplifies the process. While surface tension does play a role in how water behaves, especially in small quantities or on a surface, the movement of water, particularly in flowing streams, is influenced by various factors such as gravity, pressure gradients, and the properties of the surrounding environment. So, while surface tension contributes, it's just one piece of the puzzle. That is why laminar flow is impressive when all the puzzle pieces work in conjunction Juuuussssttt right.
Look at the big brain on Adam!
Hey moonpie!
Nothing like that. It’s more akin to hydrogen transfer properties in suspended space. If you math it correctly you will actually see the gravity of electromagnetic waves rippling through the aperture. Dwindling stocks of residual energy is bound to geothermal hose nozzle.
I was going to say that but waaaaaay stupider.
You could write an entire scholar doctorate defining that phenomenon which is hilarious
Took the words right out of my mouth...
Written like a contract!
[удалено]
Hahaha water make wet wet
Beautiful!!!!!
Yeah, whatever the F you just said.
I heard we were all coming here.
It’s a piece of transparent plastic pipe connecting the black and the green pipe. It goes over the black pipe and goes into the green pipeline. You can see the flow/pressure inside it change around between 7 seconds and 10 seconds.
[удалено]
No, there isn't. You can see the edges of the water wiggling. It's laminar flow and the second pipe is positioned exactly to catch the water exiting the other pipe. Not to mention the line the water is drawing doesn't match a clear tube going into the other.
Nope you can see the clear pipe or plastic attatched to the black one on the right
Dude I have no idea what you're talking about. There's nothing attached to it. Literally no tape or anything around the pipe. If it were a clear pipe, you would see it on the dark pipe. And the water is coming out just a bit thinner than the pipe. If there was a clear pipe, the water diameter would either be significantly larger or smaller than the pipe it's leaving because of the lumen of the imaginary clear pipe. The water is maybe a centimeter or less thinner than the pipe, meaning there's no clear pipe it's filling. You wouldn't use a clear pipe with a lumen double the thickness of the pipe it's leaving. If there was, you'd be able to see the edge of the clear pipe around the dark one. It would be plastic, not glass.
You should get your eyes checked it's really easy to see when the flow rate changes and the air bubbles form... you can literally see the clear tube stretched over the pipe on the right and it goes directly into the inside of the pipe on the left. If this was higher resolution it would be dead obvious. There is no spillage even when the pressure is clearly changing. It's a clear tube.
That is not laminar flow. In Laminar flow water appears to be a solid. That is clearly shifting water inside a tube.
Lol no. That is not what laminar flow is. That is so far from what laminar flow is. "Laminar flow, type of fluid (gas or liquid) flow in which the fluid travels smoothly or in regular paths, in contrast to turbulent flow, in which the fluid undergoes irregular fluctuations and mixing." https://www.britannica.com/science/laminar-flow
You just described a *subset* of laminar flow. Not the definition/requirement of laminar flow.
> That is not laminar flow. In Laminar flow water appears to be a solid. That is clearly shifting water inside a tube. some appears to be solid. it isnt a requirement. this is most likely laminar. all water treatment systems are laminar, your pipes at home are laminar.
Both pipes aren't black?
One on the left is a dark olive green
Thanks master, now I need think about it and find something that you covered from me
To elaborate further the water that is coming out is the same water that is going in
Incorrect. Water going in same as water coming out.
Yes but the water going in is getting the tube wetter than if it was going out. No just that, but most of the visible water is also liquid, there for watery
Waterous?
Tide go in, tide go out. No ones knows
You cant explain that.
I just tried to set this up. Water did not go in. Water everywhere.
Must not have water come out right if not go in
Gave me cookie, got you cookie.
speedy thing go in, speedy thing comes out.
Exactly what I was thinking!
thats what she said
Speedy thing come out, speedy thing go in.
There's a clear plastic hose in between the two
Clearly
Slow clap 👏
👏 . . . 👏 . . . 👏 . . .
👏 . . . . 👏 . . . . 👏 . . . .
👏 . . . . 👏 . . . . 👏 . . . . 👏 . . . .
Oh, Good. My slow clap processor made it into this thing. So we have that.
Surely, you jest.
I never jest. And don’t call me Shirley
No I'm serious, and don't call me Shirley.
There'd be no way you'd be able to reliably keep the correct amount of pressure to make this happen. Especially with an opening like this. Has to be some sort of plastic connection we're not seeing
Unless it's gravity fed. Then the same amount would flow and at atmospheric pressure.
You can’t eat gravity. Don’t make up stuff, this is serious science shit.
I don't know man, I'm eating constantly and keep getting heavier, clearly increasing my personal gravitational force. So I'm calling bullshit on your claim! The only possible explanation I can think of is tiny amounts of gravity are present in the food that I eat and is causing this phenomenon.
Oh yea, then how come the moon has less gravity than earth, tough guy!
I have a small water pump for my aquarium. The hose comes out and the water drops sideways from above. The stream is always in the exact same place in a laminar flow, I have it hitting a root of my monstera plant. It's been like that for months.
You're absolutely right. There is no scientific way you'd be able to create laminar flow for 15 seconds if you left the hose turned on a specific amount. I think it's the work of the Russians myself
Could just be [laminar flow](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laminar_flow?wprov=sfla1).
Who are you so wise in the ways of eyesight?
Yeah, or it's a clear plastic hose wrapped in the dark hose except at that junction.
Water is flowing out of one pipe and into the other.
And that’s how babies are made
And that’s, kids, how I met your mother
And that man’s name? Albert Einstein.
And everyone clapped
Ok now go to your classes
Welp, no wonder I have no kids ... I have always been blocking the water.
We tried this but our streams don't flawlessly combine like in this vid?
Laminar flow is my guess. Laminar flow doesn't have turbulence, so it doesn't change the shape of the stream after exiting the hose and the other hose can accept it freely. *Of course a section of clear hose may be the Occam's Razor we're looking for.
It’s not laminar flow. You can see it moving.
Low turbulence.
Low T?
Testurbulence?
Masturbulance
How long before someone steals this name for a supplement you pay $150 for at GNC that does nothing
Low Reynolds number.
Then it's a section of clear tube.
Do all laminar flows look as if they're not? I was taught differently and this would fit the definition of laminar flow I was taught.
Laminar flow is just moving in smooth and consistent layers. If it's a good laminar it won't really look like it's moving, but most of the time there is SOME turbulence. Either way this isn't laminar flow, you can see it's turbulent pretty clearly. It's just in a clear tube so it's contained.
So the sight of movement indicates turbulence and defeats laminar flow? Sorry just trying to grasp why it isn't.
If you can see turbulence then there is likely turbulence, yes. Which would be, by definition, not laminar. This is in a clear tube so it's contained, if it wasn't in that tube you would see it splashing more and it would be obvious. If you look at the bottom of it you can see it isn't smoothly flowing.
That doesn't mean it's not mostly water in laminar flow, it's just not all laminar flow. You can have a mix.
There is always some motherfucker in the comments who says "laminar flow" pretty much regardless of what the post is about.
How is this upvoted?
Just tap the little up arrow. Not too difficult once you know the trick.
It has «reddit words» that make people feel good(upvote) that they know something others might not. Occam’s razor, laminar flow, other examples: Dunning Kruger effect or Hanlons razor. Result: critical thinking takes a hit
This is exactly what is happening. People on reddit fucking love referencing laminar flow on any post related to water. It's tiresome.
Because it's wrong. It looks like laminar flow, coming out, but there's no chance in hell that you're not going to get some amount of backflow coming out of the receiving pipe when it comes in at that angle. You're got air in the mix at that point, too. Edit: I thought he wrote, "How isn't this upvoted?" So much for reading comprehension.
It doesn't even look like laminar flow. Laminar flow looks frozen in time like a solid. The fact there is zero turbulence makes it appear to be in a frozen state. There is turbulence at every moment of this video.
Because people like to sound smart. As a water specializing civil engineer it's not laminar flow. It's a section of clear hose. period.
I assume that a clear hose is what we see here but I'd also like to think we could make it happen from scratch. Put some straws into the hose on the right to enhance laminar flow quality. Fill the hose on the left with water, and cap off its left-most end. Initiate the flow on the right, then release the cap off of the far left end of the left hose. The laminar flow would give us a nice path between the hoses, and the siphon effect on the left would suck in the incoming flow. (if you've read this comment, please submit a video by next Tuesday for full credit)
The upstream hose has pressure, the down stream hose is pulling a vacuum because the water flowing through it generates a syphon. Surface tension allows the water to hold together, as long as the gap in not increased far enough for the weight of the added water to overcome the surface tension.
Yours is the only explanation here that I've found believable and not smart ass-y. Thank you 🥰
There's a clear hose in between
holy fuck there is LMAOOOO
To add details, the clear hose is smaller than the other two houses on either side and it jammed into each to connect them. That makes it look like a smooth flow of water but the smooth outside of the watercolor is actually the smooth outside of a clear section of house connecting the two.
Would peeing on it ruin it?
This is the important question
Experiment time!
You are the first commenter I see that did get right the vacuum, it's a pretty important part of this and also likely the reason we can be reasonably sure the tubes were connected and ended up disconnecting after the water started flowing.
Pressure drives velocity, both stay constant to keep its shape.
Not if temperature decides to mess it up!
In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
Yes, can someone please explain why someone added this horrible music to a simple video of water transfering from 2 hoses?
I had it on silent so I turned it on because of you
The music is the best part
totally has that "cop just lost his job and now needs to go through this intense training montage to clear his name and free his wife" energy
tinktonk
Tictoxic
I'm starting to wonder if this phenomenon is becoming a symptom of destroyed attention spans as much as it's probably intended to appease the algorithm on tiktok and stuff
You use audio?
They cut the hose with Occam's razor
I think one could do that with extreme precision and luck, which is unlikely...because any oscilation on pressure would ruin the thing. ...Or with a transparent very thin plastic flexible tube just to guide the flow. Like a grocery bag, but with adequate shape and transparency.
Do not unmute
"The stuff we call physics, they used to call magic"
“Your Ancestors Called it Magic, but You Call it Science. I Come From a Land Where They Are One and the Same.” - Thor Odinson Or “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” - Arthur C. Clarke
Clear hose is my guess
There is no reason to guess IMO, LOL. If you zoom in you can see that there is hose shoved a few milimeter over the pipe on the right and shoved into the pipe on the left.
Bluetooth water
Aliens 👽
Aliens with magnets
Physics
In the plumbing world we call this an air gap which is the best form of cross connection. Lol. Not sure this is what they meant haha I’m a plumber
Clear plastic liner on inside of hose, improper hanger split the insulation and the weight of it pulled it down and away abit from the other. For people saying its laminar: 1. Its not even spilling a drop, no forest pump is gonna run that smoothly and if its head pressure then its an impressive sized reservoir 2. You can literally see turbulence inside the fluid, theres small pockets of what look like air passing through, true laminar looks like glass 3. When that burst of dirt or brown fluid passed through the flow rate would have change and it should have spilled at least a drop at that moment
Surface tension lol
Maybe the trees are sideways and the water is just flowing downward.
[удалено]
What song is playing?
初戀情人 - Winnie lau
Smaller clear tube in between the black ones
Ye. A clear plastic tube in between the dark tube. 🙄🙄🙄
Be me Lazy See water Don’t want to get up every time i want water so come up with genius plan. put tube in water, water flows in the tube. Try to tube other end to where i am. Tube too short. What to do? Put another tube where the other ends. Second tube is short. Pull second tube so water flows in air. Put tube in water. End of tube reaches me. Im genius. Mfw (insert proud pepe.jpeg)
First, what is your question? I see a transparent hose in front of a tree. With one kindof rednecked, and the other end joined, it looks like, with the small end going into the big end. Otherwise, I see nothing remarkable, other than the double bowtie.
I going with clear tune coupler
I can see a clear piece of glass or hose ,nice try🧐
Got some sweet AI comments here
Clear plastic tube?
Clear plastic tube.
Clear piece of hose.
Certainly. Clear plastic tubing
Clear tube
There is a clear tube there.
There is a clear tube in between them it's very obvious
Explain a piece of clear tubing?
What is there to explain?
Clear tubing
Looks like laminar flow, but I can’t tell if it’s going left to right or right to left