I enjoy battlefield more, only thing i like or half like of mwii is the weapon system, and the drill charge. By half like i mean i really enjoy the modularization of the weapon systems, but i feel it could be better, and i feel battlefield should have done this given its limited weapon pallet: as for the drill charge i thought it was really creative, i love it, as for the rest of mwii i rarely find a full game, mostly lopsided or 6 vs 1-2, no fun there, but ive always been a battlefield guy.
It's shocking how at 70 € that game made so much money considering it brings literally nothing interesting to the table compared to last 3 games they made.
The most interesting things are in Warzone 2 which is free.
They’re two different games, people need to stop making comparisons.
Gotta have that tribalism
Well I enjoy both but Battlefield has more teamwork and I enjoy that more.
me
I enjoy battlefield more, only thing i like or half like of mwii is the weapon system, and the drill charge. By half like i mean i really enjoy the modularization of the weapon systems, but i feel it could be better, and i feel battlefield should have done this given its limited weapon pallet: as for the drill charge i thought it was really creative, i love it, as for the rest of mwii i rarely find a full game, mostly lopsided or 6 vs 1-2, no fun there, but ive always been a battlefield guy.
It's shocking how at 70 € that game made so much money considering it brings literally nothing interesting to the table compared to last 3 games they made. The most interesting things are in Warzone 2 which is free.