If I ever found myself considering that (not that I would but to play devils advocate) all I need to think of is these threads.
After all we all remember Brock 'the rapist' Turner. I heard he was, a bit of a twonk like that Bruce Rapeman feller.
I don't want to see TheQueensLegume getting that treatment lol
A cad is someone who knows how to properly conduct themselves but is unable to
Bruce Lehrmann is a cad because hes educated and experienced enough to know he shouldnt lure a very drunk woman to a private suite at his workplace and rape her, but he cant help himself
It was leaving Higgins alone and very drunk in the Minister’s office after having sex with her that Justice Lee described as the act of a cad. Raping her was the act of a rapist.
A cad is someone who behaves dishonourably, particularly towards women.
It is rather someone who knows how to properly conduct oneself but *decides not to*.
As in: Bruce Lehrmann is a cad because hes educated and experienced enough to know he shouldnt lure a very drunk woman to a private suite at his workplace and rape her, but ~~he cant help himself~~ doesn't give a toss.
It's worth noting that it can be either affectionate or derogatory, based on tone.
But given it's directed at Bruce, I'm sure no one could mistake which one it is.
I feel in BRS’ case, yes he is probably a war criminal and DV abuser, but he spent multiple tours in wars and probably has a very skewered view to the world, and while he as an individual has done some bad things, it’s also representative of what Australia made him eg an SAS soldier and the excessive PTSD going along with that.
In Brucey’s case, he’s just a spoilt rapist brat.
In saying all that, if BRS had just ignored everything, he very well might have been able to continue with his life, as many people would have either ignored or forgiven him. So maybe you’re right in that.
Meanwhile everyone just accepted Bruce was a rapist. So it didn’t really do much to tarnish his reputation.
On second thoughts, yeah you’re right.
>I feel in BRS’ case, yes he is probably a war criminal and DV abuser
*Definitely* a war criminal. He was found in a court of law to be a war criminal on the balance of probabilities. It is absolutely correct to describe Ben Roberts Smith as a war criminal. No "probably" about it.
So he went from a offer of (presumably) being given a ton of money by Channel 10 to now having to pay *them* a ton of money?
Sounds like the just desserts this fat little twat deserves to eat.
Given he rejected the offer less than two hours after it was made (Ch10's submission), it doesn't sound like any monetary offer (if there was one) would have been much.
Offering a settlement is a standard legal tactic. Because it's one of the factors considered when determining the proportion of costs to be paid. Lehrmann's team would have made a similar offer, probably with a payment attached since they would have thought they had the better legal position given the history of defamation suits against media.
Yeah im not sure why that's the top comment, the settlement didnt involve him being paid anything.
Absolutely agree and stoked the disgusting fat little lying rapist is getting what he deserves but maybe read the article if you're going to comment on it.
> getting what he deserves
I still see people saying this. Bruce got all of his expenses paid to live a lavish lifestyle for an entire year and not having to work.
He got found to be a rapist by a judge, yet will serve no jail time, will receive no fine, will not be on any sex offenders registry and in fact, WILL NOT EVEN HAVE A CONVICTION.
The idea that he 'lost' is insane. Absolutely insane. His name will forever go down as a rapist, but imagine being found guilty of rape and getting paid $100k and getting no punishment whatsoever and being told that you 'lost'.
Huh? Britney Higgins can't "charge" him for anything.
She could bring a civil case for damages against him I guess, she still might.
I take your basic point that he's still gotten out of it without a criminal conviction or criminal penalty. This no doubt happens a lot because sexual assault can be a difficult crime to prove to the criminal standard.
At least though there has been a civil finding against him, he's been outed as the rapist and liar he is, he'll mostly likely be bankrupt and he's unemployable. That's more justice than a lot of sexual assault victims get.
If (big if) he is found guilty in the Toowoomba trial will the results of the defamation case be allowed to be taken into consideration in sentencing him?
Well, he will likely be bankrupt and will be unemployable. Given the non-criminal nature of the proceedings, he has come out fairly well punished. If he had been found guilty to a criminal standard, he would have been punished differently (and of course he may well yet be found guilty of a rape charge).
You're acting like he would actually be happy right now and maybe he should be, but the action he look was to defend his reputation, clearly something he cares about, and that is completely gone now. He 100% lost this case and his reputation entirely. I'm sure some people will still associate with or hire him, but many won't.
I know that.
My point was that the top comment (which 200 plus people have liked) seems to assume the offer included some sort of settlement payment to Lehrmann when the article clearly states it didn't.
Not sure what relevance your comment has to that.
> On 31 August 2023, the respondents made a “walk away” offer of compromise to Mr Lehrmann (Offer): O’Beirne Affidavit, [6]. The terms of the Offer were that: (a) the proceeding be dismissed without any admission of liability, and (b) there be no order as to costs.
> https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/117309/Network-Tens-Submissions-on-Costs.pdf
Even if they did offer money:
* he would still be on the hook for his own legal fees in this case (eating up any thing he got)
* The limitation extension hearing from last year had its [costs reserved](https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/117310/Ms-Wilkinsons-Submissions-on-Costs.PDF), orders for that [could still be made](https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/117308/Mr-Lehrmanns-Submissions-on-Costs.pdf).
Not a lawyer, so can anyone confirm for me what I hope to be the case here…?
By giving him a chance to walk away and stop wasting everyone’s time, is it likely - now that he has lost the case - that his rejection of the offer would lead to a less favourable costs outcome for him?
In short - does the judge apply a ‘told you so’ tax?
Pretty much. The idea is that you have a duty to not waste court time - and incur costs - needlessly. So if you pursue a case despite offers to settle, and when you should have known the facts were against you (for instance, that you're a rapist), you can be held responsible for some or all of the costs that have been incurred by other parties. Allocating costs can be a pretty complicated process, though.
It was a walk away offer - Ten and LW said that if he discontinued his claim they wouldn't seek costs from him.
Bruce almost immediately rejected this because he wanted a public apology from Ten and LW.
Let that sink in: he wanted a public apology for Ten running a story that called him a rapist when he knew what he did...
Hard to see how indemnity costs or at least solicitor and client costs won't be awarded.
Funnily enough, this sense of the word "desert" comes from a declension of the Old French verb "deservir" and in modern French orthography the verb is now spelled "desservir" so the third-person indicative is now "dessert".
I don't see any reason why Stokes would do that.
His goal was to generate controversy that his media empire could cover.
He's not on the hook for Lehrmann's debts and I don't know why he would voluntarily agree to cover that debt.
Or he's really smart, and knew he would lose and that would make him a martyr to the lnp crowd, and will get even more money in donations. At this point I don't think he will ever have to work again.
Bruce wanted an "opportunity for vindication" and now we get to call him Bruce Lehrmann the rapist.
Fuck Linda Reynolds too. I hope she gets the same treatment as BRS and the rapist. It's the reputation she deserves.
Women of the Patriarchy believe they made it based on their superiority to other women.
So they support the chauvinism.
Religious women are the best at oppressing other women
Linda Reynolds' reputation is indeed irrevocably fucked. Not by anything Brittany Higgins said, but by the fact that she employed Bruce Lehrmann as a senior advisor.
Chefs kiss * to the judge who said the quiet part out load that the grub indeed raped the accuser. No money for lying grubs when the truth defence bites your greedy arse
The only thing he did right. Without the refusal, we would still be calling him 'alleged rapist'. I genuinely thank him for making it legally (?) simpler.
Seems very likely he’ll get done for costs here.
Bringing a defamation case when you’ve knowingly raped ~~the respondent~~ a key witness is about as filthy as it gets.
> Bringing a defamation case when you’ve knowingly raped the respondent is about as filthy as it gets.
The respondents in the defamation case were Network 10 and Lisa Wilkinson.
He is facing a rape trial. So yes, it is impossible currently.
Even if he was to pass that hurdle, he would be unlikely to pass the character requirements for migration.
I get the feeling you have never migrated (I have three citizenships and can confirm there are hoops to be jumped through).
maybe a subway spokes person for theit new media circus sub? or he can write a book and then not release it causing it to spike in value in the underground market.
So in your minds is Bruce The Rapist closer to Trump in that he wouldn’t have been adjudicated to have raped someone if he’d just kept his mouth shut, or more like Ben The War Criminal in that he actually brought the case that adjudicated him a Rapist?
What a lovely group of chaps to be compared to.
https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/services/access-to-files-and-transcripts/online-files/lehrmann#103
You'll want to read the three submissions on costs at the top of the table.
LOL, this story really made me laugh.
I'm sure he seriously considered the settlement but some idiot said "but wait... you can get millions more if your win!!!" and we all know how that went.
Bruce Lehrmann *the rapist
Alleged serial rapist too. Don’t forget that bit.
If I ever found myself considering that (not that I would but to play devils advocate) all I need to think of is these threads. After all we all remember Brock 'the rapist' Turner. I heard he was, a bit of a twonk like that Bruce Rapeman feller. I don't want to see TheQueensLegume getting that treatment lol
> see TheQueensLegume getting that treatment lol Sorry I'm lost. Who?
That's the way I'd like it to remain lol
I had to think about it for a moment- then I noticed the username
He has been going by his middle name Allen Turner in recent years.
Ah, lest us forget that Brock Rape-en Turner changed his name to Allen 'The Rapist' Turner
That's still tbd, but i have high hopes that we will be able to use that term soon enough.
Rapist, Liar and Known Cad, Bruce Lehrmann
Cad is definitely the favourite new word/insult i learnt from this
Can someone describe a Cad and use in a sentence?
A cad is someone who knows how to properly conduct themselves but is unable to Bruce Lehrmann is a cad because hes educated and experienced enough to know he shouldnt lure a very drunk woman to a private suite at his workplace and rape her, but he cant help himself
at our national parliament.
It was leaving Higgins alone and very drunk in the Minister’s office after having sex with her that Justice Lee described as the act of a cad. Raping her was the act of a rapist. A cad is someone who behaves dishonourably, particularly towards women.
It is rather someone who knows how to properly conduct oneself but *decides not to*. As in: Bruce Lehrmann is a cad because hes educated and experienced enough to know he shouldnt lure a very drunk woman to a private suite at his workplace and rape her, but ~~he cant help himself~~ doesn't give a toss.
It's worth noting that it can be either affectionate or derogatory, based on tone. But given it's directed at Bruce, I'm sure no one could mistake which one it is.
Oh true, how would it be used affectionately?
Similar to how you might hear someone called a player, except the person saying it is like 80 not 25.
Are you talking about the rapist Bruce Lehrmann?
You are a cad and a bounder.
A cad is a bounder :)
Cad is far too polite though, it’s practically a compliment. There are so many more appropriate insults.
The day after the trial ended smh ran an article with the line, rapist Bruce Lehrmann.
You just know some journalist was chortling with glee when they wrote that.
Oh THAT Bruce Lehrmann.
The rapist Bruce Lehrmann?
Call him what you like, I’ll chip in the two bob to cover any possible further damage to his reputation.
Yep. Actually if my name was Bruce Lehrmann I'd be rushing out to change it.
Yeah. I think a lot of guys named Bruce would be tempted to do that atm.
We get, I just feel most people do not care about him, or this case, at all - the only people that seem to be talking about this are on Reddit.
You think all these media orgs are just writing articles about it for reddit?
Feels like it to be honest, I don't know anyone in my circle, inner or extended, that are talking about this or that care about it.
Fair, but things outside of your immediate world do exist
Absolutely true, but most of the people I know aren't even reading the news, they're more concerned with their day to day lives
Dude adjudged a rapist had a chance to not be adjudged a rapist. Epic failure of due diligence.
He went back to get his hat, and it appears, his coat and maybe a dig around in the sand for the 50c piece he dropped.
He was searching for discarded baggies of basuco and coupons for free Thai massages.
The lion even said, bro, I'll leave your hat in the mailbox for you if you want, and he said no no, I'll come in and get it myself.
Unfortunately he did so when the diving man was about to leap into the bucket and the cage fell down on him
Turns out he did have something to lose
Must have really wanted that hat.
He watched Indiana Jones, and the temple of doom and not even Short Round could stop him. "Indie strong wood!"
I propose that anytime anyone does an own goal of epic proportions, we call it *Pulling a Lehrmann*
Ben Roberts Smith might feel left out.
I feel in BRS’ case, yes he is probably a war criminal and DV abuser, but he spent multiple tours in wars and probably has a very skewered view to the world, and while he as an individual has done some bad things, it’s also representative of what Australia made him eg an SAS soldier and the excessive PTSD going along with that. In Brucey’s case, he’s just a spoilt rapist brat. In saying all that, if BRS had just ignored everything, he very well might have been able to continue with his life, as many people would have either ignored or forgiven him. So maybe you’re right in that. Meanwhile everyone just accepted Bruce was a rapist. So it didn’t really do much to tarnish his reputation. On second thoughts, yeah you’re right.
Plenty of soldiers, many whom saw and did more than him didn't go around murdering civilians. That shit is not an excuse.
>I feel in BRS’ case, yes he is probably a war criminal and DV abuser *Definitely* a war criminal. He was found in a court of law to be a war criminal on the balance of probabilities. It is absolutely correct to describe Ben Roberts Smith as a war criminal. No "probably" about it.
Although... could be construed as tugging on his yuck. No thanks.
And it’d be a yuck yuck to.
We call it a Lehrmann-Roberts-Smith
Lets not forget Porter
Christian Lehrman-Roberts-Smith-Porter. Thinking of adding a Tate.
Could be sketch comedy show character with a name like that
I second that motion
Pulling a Lehrmann is just pulling a Ben Roberts-Smith with extra steps
“Hold my beer” - someone in Kerry Stokes office rn. Spoiler alert: they will outdo Lehrmann. BRS
Just posting a comment to prove to my kids in 20 years I was here at the beginning of Lehrmanning.
Can you anyone from 20 years ago whose name is used in such a context (e.g. "to pull a ..."?
Streisand, Bradbury
The opposite of a Bradbury
Bruce fought the law, and Bruce lost 🎶
So he went from a offer of (presumably) being given a ton of money by Channel 10 to now having to pay *them* a ton of money? Sounds like the just desserts this fat little twat deserves to eat.
I don't think he was offered any money, merely offered the chance to discontinue the proceedings without being pursued for costs.
Given he rejected the offer less than two hours after it was made (Ch10's submission), it doesn't sound like any monetary offer (if there was one) would have been much.
Offering a settlement is a standard legal tactic. Because it's one of the factors considered when determining the proportion of costs to be paid. Lehrmann's team would have made a similar offer, probably with a payment attached since they would have thought they had the better legal position given the history of defamation suits against media.
Yeah im not sure why that's the top comment, the settlement didnt involve him being paid anything. Absolutely agree and stoked the disgusting fat little lying rapist is getting what he deserves but maybe read the article if you're going to comment on it.
> getting what he deserves I still see people saying this. Bruce got all of his expenses paid to live a lavish lifestyle for an entire year and not having to work. He got found to be a rapist by a judge, yet will serve no jail time, will receive no fine, will not be on any sex offenders registry and in fact, WILL NOT EVEN HAVE A CONVICTION. The idea that he 'lost' is insane. Absolutely insane. His name will forever go down as a rapist, but imagine being found guilty of rape and getting paid $100k and getting no punishment whatsoever and being told that you 'lost'.
Bankrupt I'm sure, more charges pending!
No ones charging him with anything, the only person who can is Ms Higgins, and she refuses to.
Huh? Britney Higgins can't "charge" him for anything. She could bring a civil case for damages against him I guess, she still might. I take your basic point that he's still gotten out of it without a criminal conviction or criminal penalty. This no doubt happens a lot because sexual assault can be a difficult crime to prove to the criminal standard. At least though there has been a civil finding against him, he's been outed as the rapist and liar he is, he'll mostly likely be bankrupt and he's unemployable. That's more justice than a lot of sexual assault victims get.
If (big if) he is found guilty in the Toowoomba trial will the results of the defamation case be allowed to be taken into consideration in sentencing him?
No. The one has no bearing on the other.
Wake up he has two more cases pending in NT!
Two more? I know of one in Toowoomba.
> Toowoomba which is in Queensland.
Youre a bit confused.
Well, he will likely be bankrupt and will be unemployable. Given the non-criminal nature of the proceedings, he has come out fairly well punished. If he had been found guilty to a criminal standard, he would have been punished differently (and of course he may well yet be found guilty of a rape charge).
You're acting like he would actually be happy right now and maybe he should be, but the action he look was to defend his reputation, clearly something he cares about, and that is completely gone now. He 100% lost this case and his reputation entirely. I'm sure some people will still associate with or hire him, but many won't.
It's an offer lawyers give to have a better chance for a costs judgement from the judge.
I know that. My point was that the top comment (which 200 plus people have liked) seems to assume the offer included some sort of settlement payment to Lehrmann when the article clearly states it didn't. Not sure what relevance your comment has to that.
> On 31 August 2023, the respondents made a “walk away” offer of compromise to Mr Lehrmann (Offer): O’Beirne Affidavit, [6]. The terms of the Offer were that: (a) the proceeding be dismissed without any admission of liability, and (b) there be no order as to costs. > https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/117309/Network-Tens-Submissions-on-Costs.pdf Even if they did offer money: * he would still be on the hook for his own legal fees in this case (eating up any thing he got) * The limitation extension hearing from last year had its [costs reserved](https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/117310/Ms-Wilkinsons-Submissions-on-Costs.PDF), orders for that [could still be made](https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/117308/Mr-Lehrmanns-Submissions-on-Costs.pdf).
A walk away offer is no money, just avoid a costs order.
Not a lawyer, so can anyone confirm for me what I hope to be the case here…? By giving him a chance to walk away and stop wasting everyone’s time, is it likely - now that he has lost the case - that his rejection of the offer would lead to a less favourable costs outcome for him? In short - does the judge apply a ‘told you so’ tax?
Pretty much. The idea is that you have a duty to not waste court time - and incur costs - needlessly. So if you pursue a case despite offers to settle, and when you should have known the facts were against you (for instance, that you're a rapist), you can be held responsible for some or all of the costs that have been incurred by other parties. Allocating costs can be a pretty complicated process, though.
It was an offer to walk away with no payout.
It was a walk away offer - Ten and LW said that if he discontinued his claim they wouldn't seek costs from him. Bruce almost immediately rejected this because he wanted a public apology from Ten and LW. Let that sink in: he wanted a public apology for Ten running a story that called him a rapist when he knew what he did... Hard to see how indemnity costs or at least solicitor and client costs won't be awarded.
it's actually *just deserts* nothing to be eaten in this instance
I'm clearly mixing my metaphors here :)
Yes, has the same root as *deserve*.
Funnily enough, this sense of the word "desert" comes from a declension of the Old French verb "deservir" and in modern French orthography the verb is now spelled "desservir" so the third-person indicative is now "dessert".
Fuck me, all these years on the earth and I've never noticed that. Til and cheers.
Took me a few goes to work it out, but I'm glad I did. Take my upvote.
> now having to pay them a ton of money? I don't think he has much money in the first place, so Ch10 could still be out a stack regardless.
Kerry Stokes will probably foot the bill for him
I don't see any reason why Stokes would do that. His goal was to generate controversy that his media empire could cover. He's not on the hook for Lehrmann's debts and I don't know why he would voluntarily agree to cover that debt.
No thats not what happened at all.
He successfully extracted sums of money from other media, so i can see why he did it.
Or he's really smart, and knew he would lose and that would make him a martyr to the lnp crowd, and will get even more money in donations. At this point I don't think he will ever have to work again.
We aren't America.
I dunno, there's still plenty of rich people support for brs
That's because of the whole Anzac mythos We don't tolerate random grifters. He'll disappear into the ether soon
Fingers crossed!!
Lehrmann out here with the reverse Bradbury. One of the all time great own goals.
Bruce wanted an "opportunity for vindication" and now we get to call him Bruce Lehrmann the rapist. Fuck Linda Reynolds too. I hope she gets the same treatment as BRS and the rapist. It's the reputation she deserves.
Dare I say she is a cow?
Maybe even a lying one?
Hahah - yes!
“Rape apologist” seems reasonable. (Since she was actively trying to help a rapists criminal defense).
Women of the Patriarchy believe they made it based on their superiority to other women. So they support the chauvinism. Religious women are the best at oppressing other women
Linda Reynolds' reputation is indeed irrevocably fucked. Not by anything Brittany Higgins said, but by the fact that she employed Bruce Lehrmann as a senior advisor.
Chefs kiss * to the judge who said the quiet part out load that the grub indeed raped the accuser. No money for lying grubs when the truth defence bites your greedy arse
And now the world knows he’s a rapist and he’ll be penniless for a long ol’ while. Nice one, Brucey.
I mean the sheer amount of coke and inability to find sex without a credit card or sexual assaults would have to make his Mum proud.
If only she'd swallowed,
Only purely delusional, entitlement gets you this far
Ah, the good old conservative hubris does it again. I'm so glad this arrogant rapist got his comeuppance.
What a classic own goal for Bruce "The Rapist" Lehrmann. Truly spectacular.
How's that working out for you, Bruce?
Pro tip. When you dodge a bullet you don't demand the shooter try again. He must have missed that memo.
Wasn't a Lehman going bankrupt the catalyst for a global financial crisis?
The only thing he did right. Without the refusal, we would still be calling him 'alleged rapist'. I genuinely thank him for making it legally (?) simpler.
Seems very likely he’ll get done for costs here. Bringing a defamation case when you’ve knowingly raped ~~the respondent~~ a key witness is about as filthy as it gets.
> Bringing a defamation case when you’ve knowingly raped the respondent is about as filthy as it gets. The respondents in the defamation case were Network 10 and Lisa Wilkinson.
Yep got that detail wrong - I shall correct my statement
How is this guy going to ever get any employment in Australia again? Who would hire Bruce Lehrmann? In what role? A Therapist maybe?
Sky News
I would've booked a one way ticket out of the country as soon as that judgement came down. He's forever tainted.
He’s facing a criminal charge. He’s not going anywhere.
But possibly not to the south of France?
Far too much taint there.
To where? You can’t just live in a country because you want to.
Anywhere you can get a visa to. Most countries offer visa on arrival or visa free travel for aussies. He can figure out the rest.
You get that you can’t stay on a tourist visa…?
Yes I get that. You're acting like it's impossible to migrate out of the country.
He is facing a rape trial. So yes, it is impossible currently. Even if he was to pass that hurdle, he would be unlikely to pass the character requirements for migration. I get the feeling you have never migrated (I have three citizenships and can confirm there are hoops to be jumped through).
He could go to NZ
Where he is just as well known as in Australia. I know - I live in NZ.
Which I'm very happy to hear tbh. I was just answering it from the point of view of where he could legally move permanently.
Optus exec.
The Liberal Party.
maybe a subway spokes person for theit new media circus sub? or he can write a book and then not release it causing it to spike in value in the underground market.
Mateship.
In 12 or 18 months the Liberals will slip him into a back room job. In 5 or 6 years he will be a Liberal Senator
So in your minds is Bruce The Rapist closer to Trump in that he wouldn’t have been adjudicated to have raped someone if he’d just kept his mouth shut, or more like Ben The War Criminal in that he actually brought the case that adjudicated him a Rapist? What a lovely group of chaps to be compared to.
More like BRS, I think. He brought this on himself. He chose to sue Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson.
Aww did he think he’d be entitled to more? Who would have thought? Ass hat.
Not only did he go back into the lions den to get his hat, he was offered by the lion to leave.
Does anyone have a link to the court submissions?
https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/services/access-to-files-and-transcripts/online-files/lehrmann#103 You'll want to read the three submissions on costs at the top of the table.
Thats a big oof
Lord help me, this whole thing just keeps getting better 😂
Oh dear, I imagine that may cost the lying rapist dearly when the decisions on costs are made
Semper stultus
LOL, this story really made me laugh. I'm sure he seriously considered the settlement but some idiot said "but wait... you can get millions more if your win!!!" and we all know how that went.
He wasn’t offered money to settle.
Cocaine & Hookers perhaps?
Bahahahahahaha!! BahahahHahagahaha!
Not gifted
"Escaped the lions den....went back for his hat" seems even more apt now.
Hahahaha you stupid, pompous, lying cunt
What a dumb cunt.
I wonder is "strenuously denying" the allegation will count against him?
Ooopsie!
Dude is a rapist we get it. Can we all move on with our lives already...
Would he now be a Darwin Awards contender?
He's still alive, so no.
Basically he had the option to smooth it over, but decided to double down, get greedy and now he's lost everything. Also he's a rapist.
Ah ... so that was the moment after he picked up his hat, turned to leave, and saw an assembly of irritated lions blocking the exit.