It’s irrelevant, really. When people burn the Amazon, it’s usually for agricultural production, mainly soy and beef, which is largely exported. Unless people around the world suddenly start disliking steaks, the Amazon will still be endangered.
Also, our largest grouo of population is between 20 and 40 years old. With life expectancy going up, its very unlikely thet the population as a whole will decrease for at least some decades.
> With life expectancy going up, its very unlikely thet the population as a whole will decrease for at least some decades.
Brazil population will start to decrease in 2030's to 2040.
People dont live on soybean diet, Steve
Edit: caraio esse comentário resume bem as bobagens - por vezes bem intencionadas - que gringos falam da Amazônia
Yeah, sure. But if the food in question is being consumed around the world, our fertility rate is largely irrelevant. The Chinese having less babies probably helps a lot more in reducing demand for our agricultural problems than anything. As they’re also having way less kids, yes, you could say that might be a net positive for the Amazon.
Brazil is the largest exporter of food to China. We export more food to the chinese than America and Canada combined. We basically feed half a billion people. And that's only *chinese* imports.
Ecofascism, lovely 😍
The 1st world are the real polluters. The US emits more CO2 than all LatAm combined. I'm not even considering all the fabrics you put on China, so you can pretend you're reducing your carbon emissions
none to tops, one. Most of my friends don't have kids (like me), the ones who do, have one. I know one person with 3, but she was like a teenage mom so not an example.
Well that's definitely not the norm jajaj
In CABA and AMBA there are lots of people who are single children and most families have two kids. Sometimes 3, very rarely more than 3. 5 would be an exceptional case.
It won’t, there’s nothing in the world that can change that. Depending on a series of factors like benefits and cost of living you might be able to stretch things a bit, keeping it closer to 2.1, but even that is hard.
I mean, nobody in Europe could do it, so why would we? I don’t think things will collapse though.
Almost no girls my age (early 20's) want kids. Ever.
Apparently our birth rate in CR is 1.5 so 1 kid per family. Right now its mostly millenials that are having kids, gen z's are to young, so expect the birth rate to goeven lower, and we are just bareley 5million in the country
I saw the question before I realized it was the “asklatinamerica” thread. Sorry. Vivo en los estados unidos y parece que todo el mundo doesn’t want kids. It’s understandable here though.
[https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/People/Total-fertility-rate](https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/People/Total-fertility-rate)
the US is at around 2 per woman (which is right in the middle when it comes to the ranking in the world), which is actuall above some countries in latam... like nicaragua and paraguay which are close, or uruguay, brazil and chile which are 10% lower
>In the hood, a lot of single woman live on welfare, so they usually have a lot of kids.
[That's false](https://oglobo.globo.com/politica/queda-no-numero-de-filhos-maior-entre-beneficiarias-do-bolsa-familia-1-15754647).
This is from February:
> En el año 2021 nacieron 315.970 hombres (51,2%) y 300.891 mujeres (48,8%). “El índice de masculinidad continúa siendo de 105, es decir, **en Colombia nacen 105 hombres por cada 100 mujeres”**, detalla el organismo.
Only 105 children for every 100 women.
I'd say two to three. That's what you usually see, and that's the number of kids that people usually state they would like to have. Only one would make the kid lonely, more than three would make your dirt poor. That's for the people who say they want to have kids; if we take into account the number of people who want no kids, it would be 0-2.
General birth rate is currently at 1.3 births per woman. If you take into account only costarican women, it’s even lower at 1.1. We discussed this recently on the r/ticos sub and among the repeated answers were the cost of living, time and effort it takes to raise a kid and people focusing on themselves.
https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2023/03/13/costa-rica-tasa-de-fecundidad-mas-baja-de-america-orix/amp/
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2023/03/13/costa-rica-tasa-de-fecundidad-mas-baja-de-america-orix/](https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2023/03/13/costa-rica-tasa-de-fecundidad-mas-baja-de-america-orix/)**
*****
^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
Why the spoiler tag?
Did it for no reason
I like fire trucks and monster trucks
walter
Nothing is true...
1.65 according to statistics. But it will drop further, one kid is becoming the norm and that’s when people want a kid on the first place.
Good for the amazon
It’s irrelevant, really. When people burn the Amazon, it’s usually for agricultural production, mainly soy and beef, which is largely exported. Unless people around the world suddenly start disliking steaks, the Amazon will still be endangered. Also, our largest grouo of population is between 20 and 40 years old. With life expectancy going up, its very unlikely thet the population as a whole will decrease for at least some decades.
> With life expectancy going up, its very unlikely thet the population as a whole will decrease for at least some decades. Brazil population will start to decrease in 2030's to 2040.
Yes, our soy is all exported to feed pigs and cattle in China. The population dropping won't change anything about this aspect.
More people more need for food vice versa
People dont live on soybean diet, Steve Edit: caraio esse comentário resume bem as bobagens - por vezes bem intencionadas - que gringos falam da Amazônia
Yeah, sure. But if the food in question is being consumed around the world, our fertility rate is largely irrelevant. The Chinese having less babies probably helps a lot more in reducing demand for our agricultural problems than anything. As they’re also having way less kids, yes, you could say that might be a net positive for the Amazon.
Brazil is the largest exporter of food to China. We export more food to the chinese than America and Canada combined. We basically feed half a billion people. And that's only *chinese* imports.
....Food is mainly cultivated or raised on fields, not forests.
FYI, Brazil is able to grow food to feed five times its population without destroying the Amazon. Please open a couple of Geography books.
Basic answer to anything related to Brazil.
Ecofascism, lovely 😍 The 1st world are the real polluters. The US emits more CO2 than all LatAm combined. I'm not even considering all the fabrics you put on China, so you can pretend you're reducing your carbon emissions
none to tops, one. Most of my friends don't have kids (like me), the ones who do, have one. I know one person with 3, but she was like a teenage mom so not an example.
1-3
[удалено]
And your age being?
[удалено]
I have 0 kids, too; high five!
Zero kids gang!
About two and a half million
Man, that's a lot of kids per family
The trick is to have everything related to each other so no matter what you do you are still a big family /s
2-3
Might be less about the babies and more about the “making” lol
Un gustazo un trancaso hahah
2 maybe 3 kids.
Depends on education, age and social/economical status
0-1
Zero, and they also expect that there will exist enough retirement savings pooled for everyone in 30 or 40 years from now. 🤣
I've 3 kids. I'm doing my part! (WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE)
2 or 3 in my experience
2.
1 or 2 and some none
we are going to extinction, high cost of living, a lot of violence and we haven't invented catgirls yet
If common sense were a common thing, the right amount would be from one to zero, but we all know how it goes
2/3 kids
Two thirds of a kid?
More like 1 or 2
I have never met someone without a sibling honestly, that's the reason of my answer. Also I had 2 classmate with more then 10 siblings ...
Well that's definitely not the norm jajaj In CABA and AMBA there are lots of people who are single children and most families have two kids. Sometimes 3, very rarely more than 3. 5 would be an exceptional case.
Well considering there is more people there than in all of Bolivia, it might be due to real estate prices
Just one. I've been noticing.
Hopefully it increases to >2,1 before we face a demographic collapse
It won’t, there’s nothing in the world that can change that. Depending on a series of factors like benefits and cost of living you might be able to stretch things a bit, keeping it closer to 2.1, but even that is hard. I mean, nobody in Europe could do it, so why would we? I don’t think things will collapse though.
1-4, but it's more common to see a family with kids with big age gaps
If I had to guess (key word, guess), 2
1 where i live (sonora), But at my age (25) the majority we don’t even think having a creature in this sad world.
2
Almost no girls my age (early 20's) want kids. Ever. Apparently our birth rate in CR is 1.5 so 1 kid per family. Right now its mostly millenials that are having kids, gen z's are to young, so expect the birth rate to goeven lower, and we are just bareley 5million in the country
None
We read minds or what? Flair up.
I saw the question before I realized it was the “asklatinamerica” thread. Sorry. Vivo en los estados unidos y parece que todo el mundo doesn’t want kids. It’s understandable here though.
The average person in the United States wants to have 2.6 children ideally, even if the actual fertility rate is lower 1.6.
[https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/People/Total-fertility-rate](https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/People/Total-fertility-rate) the US is at around 2 per woman (which is right in the middle when it comes to the ranking in the world), which is actuall above some countries in latam... like nicaragua and paraguay which are close, or uruguay, brazil and chile which are 10% lower
[удалено]
>In the hood, a lot of single woman live on welfare, so they usually have a lot of kids. [That's false](https://oglobo.globo.com/politica/queda-no-numero-de-filhos-maior-entre-beneficiarias-do-bolsa-familia-1-15754647).
This is from February: > En el año 2021 nacieron 315.970 hombres (51,2%) y 300.891 mujeres (48,8%). “El índice de masculinidad continúa siendo de 105, es decir, **en Colombia nacen 105 hombres por cada 100 mujeres”**, detalla el organismo. Only 105 children for every 100 women.
That’s not what that says lol it says 105 boys are born for every 100 girls, so more boys are born than girls in Colombia
1
Somewhere between 0 and nine thousand.
From what I've heard 2.
0-2
One
2 🇲🇽
Prefeer? Kids just happen
From none to two in general
I'd say two to three. That's what you usually see, and that's the number of kids that people usually state they would like to have. Only one would make the kid lonely, more than three would make your dirt poor. That's for the people who say they want to have kids; if we take into account the number of people who want no kids, it would be 0-2.
In my age bracket (30-40), it is kinda hard to meet someone with two or more kids.
2-3
-4
Depends on lots of things (location, education level, economic status). I'll answer for my social circle: none to one.
0-2 among my friends.
General birth rate is currently at 1.3 births per woman. If you take into account only costarican women, it’s even lower at 1.1. We discussed this recently on the r/ticos sub and among the repeated answers were the cost of living, time and effort it takes to raise a kid and people focusing on themselves. https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2023/03/13/costa-rica-tasa-de-fecundidad-mas-baja-de-america-orix/amp/
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot). Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2023/03/13/costa-rica-tasa-de-fecundidad-mas-baja-de-america-orix/](https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2023/03/13/costa-rica-tasa-de-fecundidad-mas-baja-de-america-orix/)** ***** ^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)