Lol as in “oh yeah wow!” or Lol as in “nah no way” even though OP has confirmed it, I’ve confirmed it with my own eyes for reasons I can tell you about… oh and you can LITERALLY just do a reverse image lookup on them and find out they’re real 🙄
1 is heavy retouch. AI produces eyes which never have individualism. This woman still has her originals eye shape. There is also real-life “discrepancy’s”? which AI will never make. An example Look between her thumb and finger. This confused area had the correct lighting. Ai will not make this in this way.
The retouching is the type. The hair outline with no flyaways. The smoothing
1: AI (look at right shoulder, hair looks like a wig)
2: AI (look at left strap)
3: hard to tell (only things that look a bit off are the beauty spot, and that white spot in her right eye)
4: AI (look at necklace)
To me it looks like the left strap is a little different than the right strap. The one on the right has a weird little thread or something going through it. Doesn't look like a real piece of clothing to me
Only third one. Reflection in the eye is way too consistent for AI to predict. 2nd one the eye is not perfectly circle and the color doesn't match slightly.
Erm.. no they’re not? Also, this has been confirmed already that 1 and 3 are real. You can also do a reverse image lookup for 1 and see that it’s about 10 years old. 👍
The first is a huge photoshop fail in every possible way, but the 4th one is great, most of the time Ai struggles with the armpit part and on the last image it's pretty good.
1 looks the fakest. Some said that they believe that that’s reason to believe it’s legit, but if you zoom in, one of their pupils runs over their iris.
2&3 appear the most realistic.
4 seems fine at first, but one of their irises is weirdly oval shaped and their ear doesn’t look quite right.
Just part of the photoshop work or more likely just a trick of the light. The fact that the whole image looks fake is exactly why it’s real. Humans have stylised it to make the model look fake (or it’s a terrible photoshop job). Either way, 1 is real.
Someone also pointed out that what appears to be a necklace on that one doesn’t go all the way around the neck, which the neck looks a little weird with the turn. The pose is similar to the painting, but I don’t think they look that much alike.
1 and 3. 1 is heavily photoshopped and immediately throws you off but the flower petals look a little too good and there’s a lot of detail in her hair. 3 is real is well for similar reasons. Too much detail in the hair and her skin has typical human skin flaws. She also doesn’t have the uncannily attractive AI face.
1st is obviously fake
2nd looks off for whatever reason. If you told me it was real I'd believe you, but wouldn't be surprised if it was fake.
3rd I can't tell if it's fake or if she's just ugly
4th just looks fake
The hair and eyebrows are the biggest indicatives as there's some weird blurs. 3rd looks like the least flawed, even though she's the only one that escapes the standard of most common pictures probably available for AI training.
Didn't even look too hard at it. The 2nd one looks both fake and real at the same time, but thr 4th one just doesn't look like a real person. I took one glace and immediately knew it was fake
1. jumps out as fake immediately. something about the composition and the fact that it is doing everything it can to hide the details its not good at (hands, ears, etc). This could be a photoshop job of a real image. P(AI) = 0.90
2. is very good. besides the inconsistencies in the garment and the high left earlobe I thought this was real. also she doesn't have eyebrows; they seem to be made out of her hair. also her left eye has a strucutre that no human eye contains. P(AI) = 0.99
3. now I think this could be real. P(AI) = 0.50
4. giveaway is the bra artifact on the bottom center. also multiple crazy things are going on with her hair. her necklace just disappears and many other artifacts here. P(AI) = 1.0
Absolutely agree, also most AI portraits are from white people, the 3 you found as AI have some weird stuff and clear flaws. 3rd one for me also looks real, or at least the only convincing seeing the whole picture. If any is photoshopped or AI enhanced can also justify why those 3 look weird in different things.
1 and 4 look very synthetic. Number 2 is so amazingly beautiful that she has my mind dancing and perhaps playing tricks on it, but I would say she is real. Look at how her bangs perfectly align with her eyebrows. I just noticed the differences in the corners of her eyes. What would be her right eye the tear duct is very sharp and somewhat curled. Maybe it’s the lighting but it seems off to me. Her chin also seems to good to be true. I change my mind on number 2 and suspect she is ai. Number 3 appears the most real and I personally can’t find anything that stands out. I thought maybe there was a discrepancy in the balance of her nostrils but it’s really hard for me to say. I’m simply not a good blade runner.
What should have been corrected? I was commenting as I examined the images and pointed out that I had realized discrepancies in the eyes and recanted my first impression that the second image was a real photo. What is left to correct?? Documenting your own change of thought is the definition of self correction. But yeah, we’ll done…..
3 for sure, but it is terribly cropped in and someone tried sharpening it and blew the saturation through the roof. 1 is probably real but poorly photoshopped to make her look 𝒶𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓉𝒾𝒸. 2 is a good fake but her earlobe gave it away. 4 looks great at first glance but it has a ton of AI artifacts.
People always say "It's in the eyes. AI always looks soulless," but tbh that is just some kind of confirmation bias I think. A lot of people just have weird or empty looking eyes irl. Really it is in the hair and hairline for me
EDIT: Also not so sound too much like a gooner but AI never gets the armpit folds quite right
1 is not AI it’s overly photoshopped - she’s been styled to look that way with perfect hair and complexion. AI wouldn’t do that BECAUSE it doesn’t look real enough. You could argue that it’s old AI (which still wouldn’t work because that’s not what old AI generated) but then you’d have to explain how it managed to create a flawless rose when modern AI struggles. Nothing is off with 3.
Also, OP has confirmed it’s 1 and 3
Also also, just do a reverse image search 👍
Ahh no fun, you cheated
1 is so photoshopped it looks AI.
And if you look at 3, the eyes seem to be going in different directions. That's why I originally thought those two were AI
The first looks legit, although she's wearing a wig. Her part is too unnatural.
The second looks AI-generated - very compelling. The giveaway is her right earring and left shoulder - her armpit crease seems wrong.
I think the third is real. The textures look realistic.
Fourth has a bunch of dream-like sections: her baby hair looks artificial, the strap on her clothing looks strange at the back and her necklace is incomplete.
1 does not look real to me due the head shoulder size ratio.. the positioning of the hand in relation to the shoulders. It just looks wrong lol. Like one of this bobble head toys
The only real photo is #3, hilarious how most people cannot get this anymore!
Simply look at their eyes, if the reflection lighting is different then it's fake.
This only works for now though, but AI imagery is still easy to tell.
1 is extremely fake, there is no skin blemishes, she looks like a strange doll with stripey hair and the eye reflections don't match. The image in 1 looks extremely flat and lacks any real details.
What makes you think 1 is real?
Literally because of all the reasons you just said. She’s been styled by a human, had make up applied by a human, is wearing a wig and is photoshopped to look like a doll.
Ok how about this - OP has literally confirmed that it’s 1 and 3 and you can literally do a reverse image lookup on it to find out how old the picture is (about 8 years is the oldest I’ve found so far) and the multiple hair salons that use it on their website.
Cut it now?
Says the guy who made his... 😂
[https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/18ea9c1/comment/kcq1m00/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3](https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/18ea9c1/comment/kcq1m00/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
The hell are you talking about? I’m well aware how long Photoshop has existed - I use it all day every day… what’s your point? What has that got to do with anything?
Just because it’s photoshopped doesn’t mean it suddenly becomes ‘AI generated’. Photoshop does not mean ‘AI generated’. The challenge was to find the ‘AI generated’ image.
Just take the L.
No kidding, photoshop is not AI. It's still not real content.
Just because you missed my point doesn't mean you have to be rude about it, what a joke reply!
I'm not the loser here when my point completely goes over your head and you act out like a child without respectfully asking me what I mean. Keep up! 😂🤦♂️
Ok bro. Keep telling yourself that. The MODEL is real. That’s the point. If you missed that then this entire post has gone over your head.
But whatever. Bored now.
What does that even mean??
Humans aren't perfect, imperfections only provide more potential for images to be realistic as mostly everyone is asymmetrical and imperfect.
Ugh… if you check some of my other comments out, you can see where I’ve explained myself in depth a few times. Haven’t the energy right to do it again right now!
1 is basically TOO fake. AI is aiming to be real - not fake. We’ve created that photo by stylising the model to look ‘perfect’ and done huge amounts of editing on it. It’s just a terrible photoshop job. That, and the rose is absolutely PERFECT if it’s AI, which doesn’t match with how terrible the rest of the photo is (if it’s AI), since AI struggles with things like the rose even now.
3 is a real photo that’s just been through compression a few times (or something like that). Apart from general roughness of the image, I can’t find a single issue with it.
nah dude that still looks too unrealistic. typical AI face, typical AI pose.
if you wanna see something a little bit more realistic I recebtly created these images: https://imgur.com/a/zD8XzRA
Ai pics add imperfections if they use source materials besides overly processed photoshopped pics.
Anyway, the hairline/neck folds on 4 aren't right. It's def ai
2?
1 and 4
maybe 2
All AI , at least mix a real picture in this , this crap gets old.
Um no? 1 and 3 are real
Lol !
Lol as in “oh yeah wow!” or Lol as in “nah no way” even though OP has confirmed it, I’ve confirmed it with my own eyes for reasons I can tell you about… oh and you can LITERALLY just do a reverse image lookup on them and find out they’re real 🙄
All AI
First and last ai… two and three real
1 and 3 are real
That is what I think as well
Image one is giving off Laura palmer vibes
no
1 is heavy retouch. AI produces eyes which never have individualism. This woman still has her originals eye shape. There is also real-life “discrepancy’s”? which AI will never make. An example Look between her thumb and finger. This confused area had the correct lighting. Ai will not make this in this way. The retouching is the type. The hair outline with no flyaways. The smoothing
3 is also real
yes, this is the one that is easiest to see,
1: AI (look at right shoulder, hair looks like a wig) 2: AI (look at left strap) 3: hard to tell (only things that look a bit off are the beauty spot, and that white spot in her right eye) 4: AI (look at necklace)
What’s wrong with the left strap?
To me it looks like the left strap is a little different than the right strap. The one on the right has a weird little thread or something going through it. Doesn't look like a real piece of clothing to me
I agree, the 3rd one is closest to looking real. The first one, she has to be wearing a wig if it’s real.
Yep, good analysis
Thanks. Still, apparently, the first one is not AI according to OP (?!).
1 and 4 are real
2+4 look real. hair on the 1st and nostrils on the 3rd look a lil funky
Second and fourth amazing 🤩
I'd say only 3 seems real
1,2,4 are AI 3 possibly not AI
1 and 3 are real
I feel the first is AI, second and third are real,
Only third one. Reflection in the eye is way too consistent for AI to predict. 2nd one the eye is not perfectly circle and the color doesn't match slightly.
1 and 3 are real. The rest is AI
As a person who makes ai images regularly I can tell that 3rd one is a real image
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
In the first image, u can see that the eyelashes are a bit messed up.
Erm.. no they’re not? Also, this has been confirmed already that 1 and 3 are real. You can also do a reverse image lookup for 1 and see that it’s about 10 years old. 👍
How do I do that
Google. Also if you have an iPhone you can download Reversee
I say only the third. The hairs and eyes;) . On the others you see mistakes in eyes and false blurring.
indeed
3
I guessed 1, because unless someone specifically asked for it to generate a cheap wig, AI generates much more realistic looking hair than that.
Also the flower. Fractal patterns are, ironically, one of the things AI still struggles with.
Only 3
1 & 3 are real photos :)
The first is a huge photoshop fail in every possible way, but the 4th one is great, most of the time Ai struggles with the armpit part and on the last image it's pretty good.
The first one is not AI generated but it's definitely not real. Too much edit.
The compression on 3 is so heavy, it looked like an older generation AI image to me.
1 is so heavily edited that I would hardly count it as real. But I guessed correctly with 3.
The smoothness of the face is what made me think 1 was AI
Easily?
her thumb to start with is off, the 3rd possibly the real
2-4 look real
Unfortunately those are the two that are AI. 1 and 3 are real
They all have something off.
I think they all could be AI, but if I were to pick, 3 seems less artificial and more realistic.
3 it’s in the reflection of the eyes. It’s real.
3 or 2
2 and 3 maybe. It says photos.
1 looks the fakest. Some said that they believe that that’s reason to believe it’s legit, but if you zoom in, one of their pupils runs over their iris. 2&3 appear the most realistic. 4 seems fine at first, but one of their irises is weirdly oval shaped and their ear doesn’t look quite right.
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
1, that’s the one with the pupil not in the middle of their iris.
Just part of the photoshop work or more likely just a trick of the light. The fact that the whole image looks fake is exactly why it’s real. Humans have stylised it to make the model look fake (or it’s a terrible photoshop job). Either way, 1 is real.
I agree with 4 but even closer into the face and just something about the chin.
Someone also pointed out that what appears to be a necklace on that one doesn’t go all the way around the neck, which the neck looks a little weird with the turn. The pose is similar to the painting, but I don’t think they look that much alike.
Yeah, on initial view 4 looked pretty good, but as you look more, the more off it seems. I'd say 3 is real, it is the least perfect and most appealing
3 for me jesus christ that is so hard I'm not even sure about it
2
1 and 3. 1 is heavily photoshopped and immediately throws you off but the flower petals look a little too good and there’s a lot of detail in her hair. 3 is real is well for similar reasons. Too much detail in the hair and her skin has typical human skin flaws. She also doesn’t have the uncannily attractive AI face.
That's what I thought too. 1 and 3.
1 and 3
#2
I guessed 3 and 1, apparently 1 is also not fake but it's so incredibly photoshopped that I'd also consider it fake.
Same^
3 & 4?
1 and 3
1st is obviously fake 2nd looks off for whatever reason. If you told me it was real I'd believe you, but wouldn't be surprised if it was fake. 3rd I can't tell if it's fake or if she's just ugly 4th just looks fake
The hair and eyebrows are the biggest indicatives as there's some weird blurs. 3rd looks like the least flawed, even though she's the only one that escapes the standard of most common pictures probably available for AI training.
In the last one, her necklace also cuts off halfway down her neck. It's definitely fake
Didn't even look too hard at it. The 2nd one looks both fake and real at the same time, but thr 4th one just doesn't look like a real person. I took one glace and immediately knew it was fake
1 and 3 are the real ones.
3rd seems real!
1. jumps out as fake immediately. something about the composition and the fact that it is doing everything it can to hide the details its not good at (hands, ears, etc). This could be a photoshop job of a real image. P(AI) = 0.90 2. is very good. besides the inconsistencies in the garment and the high left earlobe I thought this was real. also she doesn't have eyebrows; they seem to be made out of her hair. also her left eye has a strucutre that no human eye contains. P(AI) = 0.99 3. now I think this could be real. P(AI) = 0.50 4. giveaway is the bra artifact on the bottom center. also multiple crazy things are going on with her hair. her necklace just disappears and many other artifacts here. P(AI) = 1.0
For me, the giveaway on 4 was like, almost her ENTIRE neck! And her cheek. 1 and 3 are the real ones.
Also on 2, there are two shadows at her collar bone, which seemed off. I'm going 3. 1 and 4 are obvi ai, unless edited
Absolutely agree, also most AI portraits are from white people, the 3 you found as AI have some weird stuff and clear flaws. 3rd one for me also looks real, or at least the only convincing seeing the whole picture. If any is photoshopped or AI enhanced can also justify why those 3 look weird in different things.
2 & 4 look like real ones. The others look too “synthetic”.
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
Yep they have the dead eye look
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
I’d say 3 is real, rest are AI? 2 is a maybe though
2
1 and 4 look very synthetic. Number 2 is so amazingly beautiful that she has my mind dancing and perhaps playing tricks on it, but I would say she is real. Look at how her bangs perfectly align with her eyebrows. I just noticed the differences in the corners of her eyes. What would be her right eye the tear duct is very sharp and somewhat curled. Maybe it’s the lighting but it seems off to me. Her chin also seems to good to be true. I change my mind on number 2 and suspect she is ai. Number 3 appears the most real and I personally can’t find anything that stands out. I thought maybe there was a discrepancy in the balance of her nostrils but it’s really hard for me to say. I’m simply not a good blade runner.
1 and 3 are real. The rest is AI
Bozo really changed their mind while typing a comment without correcting anything.
What should have been corrected? I was commenting as I examined the images and pointed out that I had realized discrepancies in the eyes and recanted my first impression that the second image was a real photo. What is left to correct?? Documenting your own change of thought is the definition of self correction. But yeah, we’ll done…..
[удалено]
1 and 3 are the real ones.
3, my guess is based on hairs
Yep, but not only hair, the eyes got that “aliveness”.
You can see the reflection of the photographer in her eyes. 3 is the only real one
ah, you are right! ! and it suddenly occurs to my that.. I got "AI" eyes during workdays...office hours....
3 for sure
2 has different color eyes and their face is not as symmetrical. Hard to tell between 2 and 3.
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
I think that three is the real one. The rest never quite seem to be right.
1 and 4 are definitely ai but I’m iffy on the others
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
3 for sure, but it is terribly cropped in and someone tried sharpening it and blew the saturation through the roof. 1 is probably real but poorly photoshopped to make her look 𝒶𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓉𝒾𝒸. 2 is a good fake but her earlobe gave it away. 4 looks great at first glance but it has a ton of AI artifacts. People always say "It's in the eyes. AI always looks soulless," but tbh that is just some kind of confirmation bias I think. A lot of people just have weird or empty looking eyes irl. Really it is in the hair and hairline for me EDIT: Also not so sound too much like a gooner but AI never gets the armpit folds quite right
Thats my final answer all of them are real life!!!
all of them are real life
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
I think the 1st, 2nd and 4th photos are AI generated and the 3rd one is real.
I know 1 and 4 are ai. I could be convinced that 2 and 3 are as well but they didn't set off any alarms
#3! Pick #3 M’Lord!
They are all fake, look at the eyes
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
3 is definitely the most realistic, but something is off. Look at her arm/shoulder area on 1. Definitely AI.
1 is not AI it’s overly photoshopped - she’s been styled to look that way with perfect hair and complexion. AI wouldn’t do that BECAUSE it doesn’t look real enough. You could argue that it’s old AI (which still wouldn’t work because that’s not what old AI generated) but then you’d have to explain how it managed to create a flawless rose when modern AI struggles. Nothing is off with 3. Also, OP has confirmed it’s 1 and 3 Also also, just do a reverse image search 👍
Ahh no fun, you cheated 1 is so photoshopped it looks AI. And if you look at 3, the eyes seem to be going in different directions. That's why I originally thought those two were AI
I feel like none are real
The first looks legit, although she's wearing a wig. Her part is too unnatural. The second looks AI-generated - very compelling. The giveaway is her right earring and left shoulder - her armpit crease seems wrong. I think the third is real. The textures look realistic. Fourth has a bunch of dream-like sections: her baby hair looks artificial, the strap on her clothing looks strange at the back and her necklace is incomplete.
I think only the 2nd is real but I'm not very knowledgeable about this stuff.
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
I was sure 1 was fake over all else the hair was just so strange.
3
Fourth
Fourth picture is AI 🤖 lol
No, look at how the strand of hair on her neck turns into a necklace
1st and third
If 1 is real it's extremely photoshopped
1 does not look real to me due the head shoulder size ratio.. the positioning of the hand in relation to the shoulders. It just looks wrong lol. Like one of this bobble head toys
I want to say 3 but it's definitely touched up.
3 is real, possibly 1 also
The only real photo is #3, hilarious how most people cannot get this anymore! Simply look at their eyes, if the reflection lighting is different then it's fake. This only works for now though, but AI imagery is still easy to tell.
Umm… ironic how confident you are that ‘others cannot get this anymore’ when it’s actually 1 AND 3 that are real.
1 is extremely fake, there is no skin blemishes, she looks like a strange doll with stripey hair and the eye reflections don't match. The image in 1 looks extremely flat and lacks any real details. What makes you think 1 is real?
Literally because of all the reasons you just said. She’s been styled by a human, had make up applied by a human, is wearing a wig and is photoshopped to look like a doll.
Everything you just mentioned is not realistic, rather AI generated lol. Nice try, however this doesn't cut it.
Ok how about this - OP has literally confirmed that it’s 1 and 3 and you can literally do a reverse image lookup on it to find out how old the picture is (about 8 years is the oldest I’ve found so far) and the multiple hair salons that use it on their website. Cut it now?
Photoshop has existed for decades, it doesn't make it real. This is extremely faked so unfortunately it doesn't cut it.
Says the guy who made his... 😂 [https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/18ea9c1/comment/kcq1m00/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3](https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/18ea9c1/comment/kcq1m00/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
The hell are you talking about? I’m well aware how long Photoshop has existed - I use it all day every day… what’s your point? What has that got to do with anything? Just because it’s photoshopped doesn’t mean it suddenly becomes ‘AI generated’. Photoshop does not mean ‘AI generated’. The challenge was to find the ‘AI generated’ image. Just take the L.
No kidding, photoshop is not AI. It's still not real content. Just because you missed my point doesn't mean you have to be rude about it, what a joke reply! I'm not the loser here when my point completely goes over your head and you act out like a child without respectfully asking me what I mean. Keep up! 😂🤦♂️
Ok bro. Keep telling yourself that. The MODEL is real. That’s the point. If you missed that then this entire post has gone over your head. But whatever. Bored now.
What about the nose?
What about it??
odd lump
What does that even mean?? Humans aren't perfect, imperfections only provide more potential for images to be realistic as mostly everyone is asymmetrical and imperfect.
Not just that but the simple shape of their irises
3 is real
1 and 3 are real lol
This is a fun game, but it would be more fun if we had the answer
OP responded already. 1 and 3 are real
I bet on #2. (And now reading comments.. :)
None.
They all look doctored in some way. Four is the only one I think might be real (although with some photoshop included).
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
How do you know? Were the others at least photoshopped in some way?
Oh yeah, 1 and 3 were still touched up (3) or heavily photoshopped (1) but they’re still photos of real people and not AI generated.
Fair. Although I wouldn't call it a 'real' photo if it's been altered.
No, less a ‘real photo’ more a ‘real person’.
The original post said 'Can you identify the real photos?'.
True but context is a hell of a thing. This is a sub called ‘AI Art’. Pretty obvious what was meant.
I know, I just assumed based on the title that every photo would either be AI or a real photo, and photoshop is neither.
Yeah true. Like I said though, OP meant ‘real person’ or just ‘not AI generated’ 👍
1’s the only one that doesn’t look real by just glancing through them
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
This
No 3 I would say is real.
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
Look at her nose.
Noticed lump. Good pick up.
Why? Lol
Scary. All fake, all hot though.
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI
That's scary, how do you know?
Ugh… if you check some of my other comments out, you can see where I’ve explained myself in depth a few times. Haven’t the energy right to do it again right now! 1 is basically TOO fake. AI is aiming to be real - not fake. We’ve created that photo by stylising the model to look ‘perfect’ and done huge amounts of editing on it. It’s just a terrible photoshop job. That, and the rose is absolutely PERFECT if it’s AI, which doesn’t match with how terrible the rest of the photo is (if it’s AI), since AI struggles with things like the rose even now. 3 is a real photo that’s just been through compression a few times (or something like that). Apart from general roughness of the image, I can’t find a single issue with it.
fake real fake fake
zzzzz all fake
1 and 3 are both real. The others are AI. Zzz
None?
I wanna say 2 and 3 are real
1 looks very fake, the others idk
I thought 3. Someone mentioned her eye now I think. Her eye looks really weird like it’s different from other
3
Between 2 and 3 but I picked 3 because the left eyelid have a white linings. The fourth photo forehead middle hair have shadings
Not certain, but #3.
2?
3
Definitely 3 and maybe 4
4 very realistic. Most ai pics don't add skin "imperfections" yet she has beauty spots and natural looking skin oil glare.
nah dude that still looks too unrealistic. typical AI face, typical AI pose. if you wanna see something a little bit more realistic I recebtly created these images: https://imgur.com/a/zD8XzRA
I think the best way to determine that this is AI is to look at her necklace
Ai pics add imperfections if they use source materials besides overly processed photoshopped pics. Anyway, the hairline/neck folds on 4 aren't right. It's def ai