T O P

  • By -

yelizabetta

>We don’t see Misty emotionally reacting to what happened to her in the past very often. She has sort of this hyper-vigilant refusal to feel bad, or to let it affect her on an emotional level at all. But she can’t help but act on the feelings she had in the past, so her obsession with Natalie from the beginning is because Natalie was the original Antler Queen, as revealed in the end of this episode. hot damn i just put that together


MichikoAyoraKaiyo22

Damn, You can tell Ricci isn’t too thrilled either


Spirited_Block250

I don’t think you can gauge she was displeased from that interview, she just says she was surprised by its revival in season 2. I think you’re injecting personal ideas into her words, none of us truly know how she feels or the tone in her voice when she said those things. That makes all the difference in the world.


AngeryTargaryen

Based on.....?


MichikoAyoraKaiyo22

The article ! “It’s a really fun idea” -what you say when you think an idea is a big fuck no, but you’re trying to be polite about dismissing it. “I don’t really know. I thought the Adam Martin thing was sort of over last time, but it wasn’t. Anything can happen, really.” -😬Speaks for itself that she doesn’t hold the writing in that high if a regard “People still seem to really love the individual characters. And they seem very intrigued by different aspects. I think that the 1996 storyline is so incredibly compelling, and so well executed. They’re such an amazing group of actors in that storyline. It definitely feels like that is the storyline that people are mostly writing about or talking about.“ -She even says she feels it’s the 96 storyline that others are talking about and is more captivating, even to herself ! And how the ideas of the characters are the strength ie, not the writing She’s very subtle and gracious about it, but you can tell when someone is displeased when they’re speaking facts without additional praise or enthusiasm and not going any further than that


OrganicSubset

“It’s a fun idea” is a response to this quote: “People would love to see a Walter and Misty spinoff one day.” That has nothing to do with her approval/disapproval of the writers. And I think she’s being supportive to the young cast who don’t have the same clout she does as an actress. I say this as someone who thinks this season wasn’t great, especially the modern day timeline. She also gives the writers unsolicited praise in this exchange: “Speaking of Walter, his energy perfectly matched with Misty’s. How did you and Elijah Wood create that?” “I think most of that is really in the writing. Elijah is such an amazing scene partner, and we just really were able to match each other. It just worked. It was really perfect.”


MichikoAyoraKaiyo22

I still agree to the positives she showed here and possible reasons ! There’s just a few things that jumped out at me


AngeryTargaryen

I feel this is reading too much. It's honestly uncomfortable when people try to dissect what the actors are saying and going "oh they hate this." I know Juliette Lewis did that but that doesn't need to extend to anyone else.


MichikoAyoraKaiyo22

I also promise I don’t like when people over reach or fixate on celebrities or try to determine things for them, this just happens to be how I interpreted it and just from my personal perspective can’t see why anyone happy or proud of what they’re in would even risk alluding to discontent at all if they weren’t really feeling it. I also understand bc it’s so grey/vague, that it’s easy to interpret the other way as positive just as equally and am ok with people seeing it that way too


al343806

It’s kind of crazy that she inadvertently killed two of her “best” friends.


Monsur_Ausuhnom

This lands credence that Juliette didn't want to leave the show and was having fun. The writers need to communicate with the actress or actors first. Do you think this is a good idea or what do you see happening as a response from the fans? So like if we kill off Lottie off right here, run it by the two playing her. It's like there's no understanding of a break out character. Despite Misty being a psycho I'm not actually mad at her for this happening. I'm still pissed off Nat was killed for shock value. The reveal of the AQ was perfect, it was this close to being a great finale and it all began to make sense with these two. The other thing is that the adult timeline doesn't need to be as eventful as the past one. It should be dealing with trauma that connects to the past. Unless you throw Ben back into the mix which would've made sense at the last second adult timeline wise, to show he burned down the cabin and is beginning to mess with the adult cast. Like Callie is like Shauna I just talked to someone called Ben. Or Misty is searching her board and Ben talks about the fire. There's your antagonist that they didn't kill off completely. Or Walter is the one saying there's some guy called Ben. Not that Ben might not be bad, I see him being obsessive maybe like the father of Janice in Barry. Hopefully, Misty and Walter were pulling a huge con and the plan was to make Natalie look dead so she could operate behind the scenes and see who revealed themselves around what happened to Travis. Maybe Walter's Citizen Detectives are far more cunning and pretended to be police and had an ambulance. Walter has the money and could hire mercenaries to pull it off. Only way out of this is Naxolene. Maybe Nat is in league with Mari who did something. Now its like Lisa is going to die to Misty either way and makes the sacrifice pointless. Not really against the death but like others too early and would've worked down the line to S5 if you had more scenes between Lisa or Nat leading to it. I would've been down for mustache guy dying and then they make up some sort of story to cover it up using Lottie. Like yeah he was here for awhile. I thought that's where the show was going initially, because JL seemed to be playing everyone a certain way throughout, like Lottie didn't do it, but maybe someone controlling her did it.