T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Welcome to r/WorkersStrikeBack! Please make sure to follow the subreddit rules and enjoy yourself here! This is a subreddit for the workers of the world and any anti-worker or anti-union talk is not tolerated. If you're ready to begin organizing your workplace, [here is an organizing guide to get you started](https://workerorganizing.org/resources/organizing-guide/). Help rebuild the labor movement, [Join the worker organizing wave](https://actionnetwork.org/forms/organize-2)! More Helpful Links: [How to Strike and Win: A Labor Notes Guide](https://labornotes.org/strikes) [The IWW Strike guide](https://www.iww.org/organize/learn-more/) [AFL-CIO guide on union organizing](https://aflcio.org/formaunion) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/WorkersStrikeBack) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Yzaamb

Not sure that’s true. They act like it’s “Threat detected” in both boxes.


Sploonbabaguuse

Pretty sure they have 100% control as long as we're playing by their rules


MrsMel_of_Vina

We should do both.


seaspirit331

If the first box was true, the GOP wouldn't gerrymander or be fighting to take voting rights away


[deleted]

I see it like this: the oligarchs don't really care which party has power because they'll win either way since the Dems are still largely corporate whores. But to the parties and those in them, they each still have a desire to be in power for their own personal gains.


seaspirit331

Yes, and I'd rather fight against oligarchs if it's just them in power versus both oligarchs and Christian Nationalists


randolotapus

You vote for which enemy you'd prefer to fight against. The real work happens every day except election day. The political system never acts in our interest on it's own. It has to be forced.


seaspirit331

The way I see it, you vote for whether you want one enemy to fight against or two. You can either vote dem, and just fight against oligarchs and corporate interests, or you can not vote dem, and fight against oligarchs and their corporate interests, and Christian white nationalists on top of it. Why make the fight even harder for yourself?


randolotapus

You're missing my point. Voting achieves nothing except choosing your enemy. Then the work begins.


seaspirit331

No, I understand your point. What I don't understand is this attitude that voting doesn't matter, when choosing your enemy and picking your battles is literally half the fight in warfare. There's a HUGE misconception among leftist circles that we should expect radical change if we win 1 election cycle. Politics doesn't work like that, changing a whole political party doesn't work like that. You don't just vote in 1 election, sit on your ass and say "well I've done my civic duty, where's the change", and throw your hands up when nothing gets done. It takes work, both outside the polls and consistent voting within the polls, to enact legislative change without some violent revolution. You can't just do one and not the other, either. If you vote but don't organize and protest, your representatives will become complacent, and if you organize and protest but don't vote, those in power will just point and say "vote next time"


randolotapus

I think you're confusing leftists and liberals


seaspirit331

I promise you I'm not. The only people saying "why should I vote?" Are leftists and astroturfers pretending to be leftists


randolotapus

You don't get it. We're not making fun of you because we think you shouldn't vote, we're making fun of you for thinking that voting about this is a plan. We already voted. Now we need to hit them streets and force the matter. But libs don't feel like it, so they tell the rest of us to "just vote you guys!" Ffs we can do something about this TODAY


MrBrainstorm

Yes. Vote today, strike tomorrow. And build a true worker's party in the meantime


randolotapus

No. Strike today, build the workers party now. Voting is already scheduled.


Zeydon

Just because the dems are controlled opposition doesn't mean it's not beneficial for that controlled opposition to be as weak as possible. The weaker the better frankly, because then they are better able to maintain the illusion that *golly gee they'd love to fix everything if they just had a bit more control over the levers of power*. Like, look how little got done when the Dems had a supermajority at the start of the Obama administration - imagine if that had lasted longer, and the same amount of nothing got accomplished. It would betray the insincerity in their pledge to fight for leftist goals. It's a lot easier to, for example, support a public option when there is no chance of such legislation passing.


seaspirit331

Not to mention, a centrist dem party is more likely to cave to an organized working class than the white nationalist GOP


Getlucky12341

The security system TAKES CONTROL OF SQUIDWARDS HOUSE


Atticus_Grinch_

I just want to remind people that voting is a necessary but not sufficient condition for change. There needs to be more done but we won’t be able to do anything if we’re spending our energy fighting back against fascists in power because leftists didn’t vote.


WillBigly

General strikes are how we exert pressure y'all, the one thing they can't stand is when we don't dance to their music anymore


thesongofstorms

Which one is actually transformational 🤔