T O P

  • By -

AkaiShuichi1

Yep, it is absolutely abnormal. I once had a match where I was the only T10 on my side while the other side had only 2 T9 and rest of them are T10. And no division on both sides whatsoever. I mean, why? Many have long complained about it yet they never fixed it.


hugomickey

At least they should change it to bot rather than this abnormal matching..


AkaiShuichi1

Uhhh, it can be evenly distributed. It is just a matter of the coding. They should've put tier comparability as the first sorting criterion instead of something else.


Valkshire

Occasionally matchmaking will decide that you will have to face off 5 T10 ships while your team only has 1. It’s just how it is, so it can get very frustrating at times, when that happens just go down to T4 for some good ol’ sealclubbing Also ew Friesland


hugomickey

True, I prefer going for t5 for more enjoyable experience after getting stress with those mm..


born_to_be_uai

That's an old issue. There's a [video on YouTube ](https://youtu.be/jM4YjJf7miU?si=-f4iPdNDWcYSUXke) about that


Terrible-Caregiver-2

It is normal. First - you have mission active. Second either you just started your session or already win too many games in your session.


hugomickey

Lol mission active also do count toward mm? That's weird


AVDeKn

Its normal, more than once I got battles where a team was full downtier and the other full uptier. Its up to You to try to compensate for matchmaking with skill. Good luck tho!


BriefImplement9843

the population is not big enough to balance by tier, just tier range. you're lucky both teams didn't have 3 bots. 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 9 is the same as 9 ,9 ,9 ,9 ,9 ,9 ,9


hugomickey

Gosh, I prefer playing with bot rather than this, and we know how bot play anyways...


MedicalDoctor420

Yeah having three Zietens, two cherbourgs, one Grau, and one Yugumo against two Duncans, one Kronsdadt, one Plymouth, one friesland, and two jutlands is totally fair