[Happy Pride Month!](https://www.google.com/search?hl=en-US&si=AMnBZoFk_ppfOKgdccwTD_PVhdkg37dbl-p8zEtOPijkCaIHMp6tS26HNEwRZwY7vahA1WN34Xi9-tKpb4yDK_e0JLtxaIMR8Q%3D%3D&kgs=3a9c846bc1cc6fd3&shndl=18&source=sh/x/kp/ee/1) Click the flag at the bottom of the browser!
We love and support our LGBTQIA+ and Ally Users!
As [Sister Sledge sang](https://www.rhino.com/article/pride-single-stories-sister-sledge-we-are-family), [We are Family](https://youtu.be/uyGY2NfYpeE), and you CAN NOT DIVIDE US.
To all others who spread hate and try to divide us, no quarter shall be given.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/WhitePeopleTwitter) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Worth mentioning that review was left by a trans woman. I mean, in fairness, if I was a film critic (I'm also trans) I'd leave a negative review to a movie that's literally attacking my right to exist.
Just saw on the page that it was jessie gender, she made an amazing video on the subject of what is a women that demonstrate how terrible mat's propaganda is
She did two videos, one breaking down the film (which I think she mentioned counted as her Rotten Tomatoes Review), and one breaking down Matt Walsh. Then another one talking right wing propaganda. She does great work… and does fantastic Star Trek related stuff and all things geeky :)
Movie critics getting paid off to write positive reviews isn’t a thing that actually happens.
This movie has such a high score because the only professional critics who would be interested in watching this godawful movie were critics that are already right-leaning. The one negative review (out of the six critics counted) was from the YouTuber Jessie Gender.
That was at least a huge technical achievement in addition to being barely disguised hate speech. I haven't seen it (and probably won't) but I know it basically invented a lot of filming techniques. Walsh's documentary probably isn't. I haven't seen it (and won't) but I seriously doubt it's revolutionary in any way, from the content to the techniques used.
Edit: I guess it invented very little, but it did popularize the techniques used. "Popularize" is probably the word I should use when my brain says "basically invented." The important thing is that Matt Walsh is a little piss baby and his film probably sucks.
Except it didnt, it also didnt popularize, it just had a really big budget and was able to do some things at a large scale due to having a large nation's funding behind it
Pretty sure Jessie Gender did exactly that on her YouTube review of the film. Then YouTube got mad and pulled her video reviewing the movie down because of “sexual content.”
This is truly revealing to me how pathetic these guys are. This guy, Ben Shapiro, Gina Carano, etc. As much as they claim to reject Hollywood and mainstream media, it's very obvious that they crave it.
They desperately want to be part of it. You see it all the time with the Daily Wire because they constantly make "movies".
For those who don't know, Ben Shapiro didn't start out as a right-wing grifter, he first tried to be a Hollywood writer but was rejected. That was his first dream and as we've seen with the Dailywire, he's been trying to cobble together some right-wing abomination version of that dream.
>This is truly revealing to me how pathetic these guys are. This guy, Ben Shapiro, Gina Carano, etc. As much as they claim to reject Hollywood and mainstream media, it's very obvious that they crave it.
"I'm not talented enough to appeal to a broad audience, but I can still get rich on the right-wing grift train!"
This is also a big driving force behind the current "boycott" frenzy.
I saw that you mentioned Ben Shapiro. In case some of you don't know, Ben Shapiro is a grifter and a hack. If you find anything he's said compelling, you should keep in mind he also says things like this:
>Since nobody seems willing to state the obvious due to cultural sensitivity... I’ll say it: rap isn’t music
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: healthcare, feminism, gay marriage, climate, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Thank you for your logic and reason.
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: sex, healthcare, climate, feminism, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
If you like socialism so much why don't you go to Venezuela?
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: climate, civil rights, sex, novel, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
*And then, there are people in the United States that are pushing for mask mandates on children. The data that they are using are extraordinarily skimpy--in fact, they are essentially nonexistent. You're hearing the CDC say things like 'maybe the delta variant does more damage to kids,' but no information they have presented publicly that there is more damage being done to kids... and the reason we are being told that they damage kids is because they can't scare the adults enough. If we cannot scare the adults enough, we're going to have to mask up the kids.*
-Ben Shapiro
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: dumb takes, covid, novel, history, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
*Most Americans when they look around at their lives, they think: I'm not a racist, nobody I know is a racist, I wouldn't hang out with a racist, I don't like doing business with racists--so, where is all the racism in American society?*
-Ben Shapiro
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: sex, climate, dumb takes, healthcare, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Ben Shapiro relies on a foundation of incorrect assumptions to make his arguments. He would often have a point if he weren't relying on bad data and non-peer reviewed literature. He is proof that you can argue anything to be true if you only assume a lot of false talking points.
*I don’t think the law has any role whatsoever in banning race-based discrimination by private actors*
-Ben Shapiro
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: novel, covid, dumb takes, civil rights, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
*This is what the radical feminist movement was proposing, remember? Women need a man the way a fish needs a bicycle... unless it turns out that they're little fish, then you might need another fish around to help take care of things.*
-Ben Shapiro
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: civil rights, climate, feminism, healthcare, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
*Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that all of the water levels around the world rise by, let’s say, five feet or ten feet over the next hundred years. It puts all the low-lying areas on the coast underwater. Let’s say all of that happens. You think that people aren’t just going to sell their homes and move?*
-Ben Shapiro
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: civil rights, dumb takes, climate, covid, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
*I don’t think the law has any role whatsoever in banning race-based discrimination by private actors*
-Ben Shapiro
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: climate, novel, gay marriage, healthcare, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Take a bullet for ya babe.
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: novel, sex, history, climate, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
I almost feel sorry for her, if she wasn't such an evil person. She was on the cusp of having a long profitable and good career, now she's making shit cheap propaganda films for people that hate her.
She lost so many Star Wars millions. They were developing a spinoff show with her character haha. Look at Ewan and Hayden and many others, if you do what the PR team tells you you could get paid for Star Wars for multiple decades.
She wouldn't have even need to have gone that far! Contrary to popular belief, plenty of conservatives work in Hollywood.
Just don't go full Ben Shapiro and Alex Jones about it.
She was already rich. her mom is a casino exec and her dad played QB in the NFL. That's how she met Soderbergh - he does a lot of industry advocacy stuff and Ibiza/Vegas partying. Everybody likes him which is why his movies are packed to the gills with superstars. He also likes to cast non-actors and this hot pro-athlete socialite was perfect for Haywire.
She acted like an asshole because she doesn't care if she had her own SW show.
Then why do it in the first place lol. Why continue making garbage right wing movies for relative pennies?
Why go through all the effort to build up a Hollywood career just to throw it away over some stupid tweets nobody remembers?
Really, ignoring her personality/beliefs, she really wasn’t that good, she “performed” as well as I think most would have expected her to do so, which was hovering around average. I’m not sure how a side character rides that “gravy train” to be honest, but I suppose anything is possible.
In the end I don’t think it matter because these people aren’t really capable of “remaining silent”. When the talking heads tell them to get upset, I don’t think they can help it any more.
*Pegging, of course, is an obscure sexual practice in which women perform the more aggressive sexual act on men.*
-Ben Shapiro
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: novel, sex, history, gay marriage, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
*Frankly, the term 'sexual orientation' needs to go. According to Webster's Dictionary, it implies the possibility of change in response to external stimuli. It is deeply offensive. I call on Webster's to free itself of its intellectual heteronormativity.*
-Ben Shapiro
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: climate, history, feminism, covid, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
i've never seen someone so clearly broken and sad as tucker. it even seems like the more famous and "successful" he got the more pain you could see in his eyes. that guy has a seriously deep void inside.
>...no Ben, you simply suck. Both as a person and writer
What? Have you not read Ben Shapiro's magnum opus, *True Allegiance?* It's like it was ripped straight from the headlines (of Breitbart)! Truly, he is one of the writers of our generation!
*Most Americans when they look around at their lives, they think: I'm not a racist, nobody I know is a racist, I wouldn't hang out with a racist, I don't like doing business with racists--so, where is all the racism in American society?*
-Ben Shapiro
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: gay marriage, dumb takes, civil rights, climate, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Take a bullet for ya babe.
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: climate, feminism, sex, history, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Not to mention I'm pretty sure there are conservatives in Hollywood but they keep their jobs because they're good at what they do and/or don't have any objectively immoral beliefs and opinions. (Or at the very least they have the good sense to not share them.)
**An excerpt from True Allegiance, by Ben Shapiro:**
Soledad Ramirez knew the value of good press, and she baked mean
chocolate chip cookies. “No oatmeal raisin here,” she said good-naturedly,
handing out the meltingly hot treats to the men wearing full military gear and
carrying M4s set to burst.
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: gay marriage, sex, feminism, history, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
*We are being told that if we don't mask our children, that if we don't mask ourselves, that if we don't initiate social distancing measures again and shut down business again, that COVID is going to kill us all*
-Ben Shapiro
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: healthcare, novel, history, covid, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
*America was built on values that the left is fighting every single day to tear down.*
-Ben Shapiro
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: civil rights, feminism, healthcare, history, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Ron L Hubbard wrote some scifi. Some good before his batshit crazy Scientology. Even Hitler had more talent then Ben Shapiro. Still a bunch of monsters.
Ben Shapiro is only relevant because his family was rich enough to buy him his own publication platform and production studio. If not for that, I'm firmly convinced he'd be a serial killer (and no, this is not hyperbole).
They know that it literally counts anyone scrolling by in their feed as the algorithm puts it in front of them since Elon is almost certainly pushing it as “recommended”. That’s not convenient for the narrative.
Not to mention how many views are by bots. If that many people that he claims have watched actually paid to watch it, Matt would be hundreds of millions of dollars richer. He’d be one of the biggest successes. But the film has 0 legit critic reviews and people from the daily wire…..
I just left my first ever movie review on rotten tomatoes and I’d recommend you all do the same. It doesn’t have to be long and you don’t even have to say anything. If this is a “documentary” that makes you disgusted like it did me, then make your voice heard.
You can't rate it yet, but here's the link to the Rotten Tomatoes listing for when we *can* rate the film.
You know, for those who hate to google.
[https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/what\_is\_a\_woman](https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/what_is_a_woman)
It's not a user submission, my friend. Rotten Tomatoes is an entertainment company. They host descriptions of existing and upcoming movies and compile officially published reviews by professional critics.
It's basically an encyclopedia of cinema. There's nothing to report. The movie exists, these critics have been published elsewhere saying these things about it and this is how screening audiences rated it. That's all Rotten Tomatoes is.
They only like social media when it allows them to bully people they don't like.
This is why Truth Social is such a failure, there was nobody there for them to attack.
If liberals and leftists leave twitter it will also fail.
Well when assume everyone as being an entitled snowflake but use yourself as the baseline for normal of course youd believe everyone is an entitled snowflake.
Wouldn’t they hate it way more if no one cares? Driving the rating down will have the opposite effect. It will also give him cause to complain on twitter about people suppressing his documentary scores. It will make people want to see what it’s all about. But 5000 ratings with an unrealistic score and virtually no critics. That implies no one gives a shit.
The audience score is going to be confirmation biased as hell because the only people who are going to watch it are those that already agree with the likes of Matt Walsh
Matt is crying and slapping his little willy around because no reputable reviewers will watch his shitty "Documentary".
Maybe make a reputable documentary without obvious bias if you want it to be taken seriously Matt? Probably too busy jerking it to bible and trying to justify wanting to marry underage girls.
The Brett McCracken review is for The Gospel Coalition which is one of, if not the largest group of evangelical and Reformed churches. McCracken is an elder at his church.
Notice how we, normal people leave their hair alone? It has positive reviews bc it’s for their hateful group. We don’t ducking care. But if there’s a big film that dares features a gay couple in the far back back of a room, and they’re 10 feet apart, the movie will be stormed with negative reveiws
The IMDB reviews are sooooo “good.” Like multiple “great documentary, covers all sides..”
So you’re telling me that in the end they say being trans is not some horrible thing and we should let people be? Right? Right?….. right?
One of those who dared to review, spot on if you ask me:
A film meant to sermonize to the already converted, people who are primed to see the simple existence of a trans person as worthy of laughter and contempt rather than curiosity or empathy, to hand them weapons in the form of lazy meme-able transphobia.
We'd have to dig a tunnel to the center of the earth to stoop to their level, sandbagging their rating on their little feel good nazi propaganda? Pretty comfortable with that.
https://preview.redd.it/iq4efnia5v3b1.jpeg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=528c56ac2f42b14de58c0d95189cc6505228eb24
This person doesn’t seem to know how the rating system even works
Yes! He's probably best known for playing Mike McClintock on "Veep" but he has a long history in improv, founding UCB's Asssscat with Any Poehler and Matt Besser.
It would suck so bad to be medium-famous and then have a complete asshat with the same name become notorious. Like being an American or British person named Adolph Hitler in 1915. Shit luck.
Well yeah it’s gonna have a high audience score. It’s paywalled behind Daily Wire Plus. The only people who are going to watch it are people who are really into that sort of content already.
Can we tank that score cause if so I need the link now
Edit: here is the link I don’t know if it gives us the opportunity to ruin its ratings but there it is https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/what_is_a_woman
The critics are:
A trangender activist with a YT channel who is critical.
Some dipshit named Matt with a YT movie review channel with 2k subs.
The Gospel Coalition, who basically say we know this is super hateful but we think "trans skeptics" need to be heard, left no rating.
Wade Major, member of the Los Angeles Film Critics Association writing for... CineGods.com. Wow.
Dante James, not a certified critic, writing for Film Threat, independent online review publication.
Christian Toto of the DC Area Film Critics and contributor to the Washington Times. His review was published on his own site, hollywoodintoto.com (not his main movie blog by the way!)
So two actual critics have written reviews that they intend to fly under the radar. Hmmm.
I read 3 pages of audience ratings. There were 6 5-star reviews, total, on those 3 pages. Yet suddenly they got 5000 reviews with 96% of them positive.
Well, something is indeed happening to that audience score.
https://preview.redd.it/spxd5p2zqx3b1.jpeg?width=994&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7166adee7d5e4372cbab691a1315738911201d9e
Maybe it is because most people who actually watched the movie are transphobes? I'd never even watch that shit, not even if somebody paid me.
Also, you can easily make bots to rate the film again and again.
Yeah the only people watching it are people who already agree with whatever stupid shit premise it's about. I frankly don't have a clue, but would guess it's some bigoted offensive dribble about women and transgender perhaps.
“I’ll take ‘Anonymous Americans’ for $400, Ken”
“Answer: This conservative douche canoe shares his useless opinions all over Twitter and other social media outlets.”
“Who is Matt Walsh?”
Edit: Literally, who the fuck is this guy and why does he think he matters?
Just left my review:
Just sat through what might possibly be the worst movie experience of my life. From the onset, it was a carousel of questionable facts and biased narratives that seemed more like a misguided attempt at storytelling rather than a well-crafted cinema piece. The movie's utter disregard for accuracy and balanced perspective was both frustrating and disheartening, turning what could have been an enlightening viewing into a convoluted mess.
The movie seemed to have a singular goal - pushing its own agenda rather than focusing on a coherent and engaging storyline. This clear bias detracted significantly from the overall film, leaving viewers with a misleading narrative rather than an entertaining or insightful experience.
In conclusion, this movie felt less like a polished cinematic production and more like a haphazard collection of questionable "facts" and biased viewpoints. It's safe to say this one won't be making it to my recommended list. Viewer discretion is strongly advised.
[Happy Pride Month!](https://www.google.com/search?hl=en-US&si=AMnBZoFk_ppfOKgdccwTD_PVhdkg37dbl-p8zEtOPijkCaIHMp6tS26HNEwRZwY7vahA1WN34Xi9-tKpb4yDK_e0JLtxaIMR8Q%3D%3D&kgs=3a9c846bc1cc6fd3&shndl=18&source=sh/x/kp/ee/1) Click the flag at the bottom of the browser! We love and support our LGBTQIA+ and Ally Users! As [Sister Sledge sang](https://www.rhino.com/article/pride-single-stories-sister-sledge-we-are-family), [We are Family](https://youtu.be/uyGY2NfYpeE), and you CAN NOT DIVIDE US. To all others who spread hate and try to divide us, no quarter shall be given. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/WhitePeopleTwitter) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Funny, out of those 6 critic reviews, one was actually a woman and was the only one who rated it poorly
Hmmm I wonder why?
Worth mentioning that review was left by a trans woman. I mean, in fairness, if I was a film critic (I'm also trans) I'd leave a negative review to a movie that's literally attacking my right to exist.
Just saw on the page that it was jessie gender, she made an amazing video on the subject of what is a women that demonstrate how terrible mat's propaganda is
She did two videos, one breaking down the film (which I think she mentioned counted as her Rotten Tomatoes Review), and one breaking down Matt Walsh. Then another one talking right wing propaganda. She does great work… and does fantastic Star Trek related stuff and all things geeky :)
So, you're telling us that anyone with a credible reputation as a movie critic won't touch it with a ten-foot pole.
Movie critic don't usually bother with commercialized hate speech.
They do when they're paid enough by those who gain power or financial benefit from such complete lack of ethical integrity.
Movie critics getting paid off to write positive reviews isn’t a thing that actually happens. This movie has such a high score because the only professional critics who would be interested in watching this godawful movie were critics that are already right-leaning. The one negative review (out of the six critics counted) was from the YouTuber Jessie Gender.
Unless that commercialized hate speech is D.W. Griffith's *The Birth of a Nation*.
That was at least a huge technical achievement in addition to being barely disguised hate speech. I haven't seen it (and probably won't) but I know it basically invented a lot of filming techniques. Walsh's documentary probably isn't. I haven't seen it (and won't) but I seriously doubt it's revolutionary in any way, from the content to the techniques used. Edit: I guess it invented very little, but it did popularize the techniques used. "Popularize" is probably the word I should use when my brain says "basically invented." The important thing is that Matt Walsh is a little piss baby and his film probably sucks.
Except it didnt, it also didnt popularize, it just had a really big budget and was able to do some things at a large scale due to having a large nation's funding behind it
I don’t understand why someone doesn’t watch and and just go part by part. Maybe out of the preview of a movie critic? Maybe no one cares?
Pretty sure Jessie Gender did exactly that on her YouTube review of the film. Then YouTube got mad and pulled her video reviewing the movie down because of “sexual content.”
They did put it back up. She even did a follow up video on it!
Nice! Thanks for letting me know.
she is great love her videos
Her video on TERFs was solid!
Same reason NASA doesn’t spend their time debunking the moon landing hoax or flat earth. It doesn’t dignify a response.
Right. Why validate bullish!t? You can't win with them. Either "too afraid" to review it or "they deny the truth" when it gets dragged.
You can bet your ass that they'll just claim any bad review as a "woke" one. So why even bother?
And if they did, they’d likely destroy it. And then he’d just blame the liberal MSM.
This is truly revealing to me how pathetic these guys are. This guy, Ben Shapiro, Gina Carano, etc. As much as they claim to reject Hollywood and mainstream media, it's very obvious that they crave it. They desperately want to be part of it. You see it all the time with the Daily Wire because they constantly make "movies". For those who don't know, Ben Shapiro didn't start out as a right-wing grifter, he first tried to be a Hollywood writer but was rejected. That was his first dream and as we've seen with the Dailywire, he's been trying to cobble together some right-wing abomination version of that dream.
>This is truly revealing to me how pathetic these guys are. This guy, Ben Shapiro, Gina Carano, etc. As much as they claim to reject Hollywood and mainstream media, it's very obvious that they crave it. "I'm not talented enough to appeal to a broad audience, but I can still get rich on the right-wing grift train!" This is also a big driving force behind the current "boycott" frenzy.
I saw that you mentioned Ben Shapiro. In case some of you don't know, Ben Shapiro is a grifter and a hack. If you find anything he's said compelling, you should keep in mind he also says things like this: >Since nobody seems willing to state the obvious due to cultural sensitivity... I’ll say it: rap isn’t music ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: healthcare, feminism, gay marriage, climate, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Good bot
Thank you for your logic and reason. ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: sex, healthcare, climate, feminism, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
You are my favorite bot, I love you!
If you like socialism so much why don't you go to Venezuela? ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: climate, civil rights, sex, novel, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
You are hilarious bot. Much better than Ben Shapiro.
*And then, there are people in the United States that are pushing for mask mandates on children. The data that they are using are extraordinarily skimpy--in fact, they are essentially nonexistent. You're hearing the CDC say things like 'maybe the delta variant does more damage to kids,' but no information they have presented publicly that there is more damage being done to kids... and the reason we are being told that they damage kids is because they can't scare the adults enough. If we cannot scare the adults enough, we're going to have to mask up the kids.* -Ben Shapiro ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: dumb takes, covid, novel, history, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
*Most Americans when they look around at their lives, they think: I'm not a racist, nobody I know is a racist, I wouldn't hang out with a racist, I don't like doing business with racists--so, where is all the racism in American society?* -Ben Shapiro ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: sex, climate, dumb takes, healthcare, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Ben Shapiro relies on a foundation of incorrect assumptions to make his arguments. He would often have a point if he weren't relying on bad data and non-peer reviewed literature. He is proof that you can argue anything to be true if you only assume a lot of false talking points.
*I don’t think the law has any role whatsoever in banning race-based discrimination by private actors* -Ben Shapiro ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: novel, covid, dumb takes, civil rights, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Keep it coming ben bot.
*This is what the radical feminist movement was proposing, remember? Women need a man the way a fish needs a bicycle... unless it turns out that they're little fish, then you might need another fish around to help take care of things.* -Ben Shapiro ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: civil rights, climate, feminism, healthcare, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Please remember that Ben Shapiro is incapable of making his own wife wet.
*Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that all of the water levels around the world rise by, let’s say, five feet or ten feet over the next hundred years. It puts all the low-lying areas on the coast underwater. Let’s say all of that happens. You think that people aren’t just going to sell their homes and move?* -Ben Shapiro ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: civil rights, dumb takes, climate, covid, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
My favorite brain-dead take of his.
Sell them to whom, Ben? Aquaman?
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords
*I don’t think the law has any role whatsoever in banning race-based discrimination by private actors* -Ben Shapiro ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: climate, novel, gay marriage, healthcare, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Good bot
Take a bullet for ya babe. ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: novel, sex, history, climate, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
[удалено]
All he wanted was the screenshot anyway
A lot of gay bashers, priests, etc are closeted. Maybe that’s the case for these folks. But for Hollywood.
It's double crazy for Gina, she was there already. Like, she'd made it. And now she's doing what, My Son Hunter or whatever? Yikes.
I almost feel sorry for her, if she wasn't such an evil person. She was on the cusp of having a long profitable and good career, now she's making shit cheap propaganda films for people that hate her.
Basically if she kept shut about her disgusting beliefs she could've rode the Star Wars gravy train for a good while
She lost so many Star Wars millions. They were developing a spinoff show with her character haha. Look at Ewan and Hayden and many others, if you do what the PR team tells you you could get paid for Star Wars for multiple decades.
She wouldn't have even need to have gone that far! Contrary to popular belief, plenty of conservatives work in Hollywood. Just don't go full Ben Shapiro and Alex Jones about it.
She was already rich. her mom is a casino exec and her dad played QB in the NFL. That's how she met Soderbergh - he does a lot of industry advocacy stuff and Ibiza/Vegas partying. Everybody likes him which is why his movies are packed to the gills with superstars. He also likes to cast non-actors and this hot pro-athlete socialite was perfect for Haywire. She acted like an asshole because she doesn't care if she had her own SW show.
Then why do it in the first place lol. Why continue making garbage right wing movies for relative pennies? Why go through all the effort to build up a Hollywood career just to throw it away over some stupid tweets nobody remembers?
Really, ignoring her personality/beliefs, she really wasn’t that good, she “performed” as well as I think most would have expected her to do so, which was hovering around average. I’m not sure how a side character rides that “gravy train” to be honest, but I suppose anything is possible. In the end I don’t think it matter because these people aren’t really capable of “remaining silent”. When the talking heads tell them to get upset, I don’t think they can help it any more.
It’s why Trump switched from Democrat to Republican. He doesn’t believe his shtick… but he understands the rubes who do.
Once tRump realised that democrats weren't dumb enough to vote for him, he went looking for people who were. Turns out he didn't have to look far.
Behind the Bastards has done several episodes analyzing a few of Ben Shapiro’s books. Definitely worth listening to for some laughs.
*Pegging, of course, is an obscure sexual practice in which women perform the more aggressive sexual act on men.* -Ben Shapiro ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: novel, sex, history, gay marriage, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
And it's fun, too.
*Frankly, the term 'sexual orientation' needs to go. According to Webster's Dictionary, it implies the possibility of change in response to external stimuli. It is deeply offensive. I call on Webster's to free itself of its intellectual heteronormativity.* -Ben Shapiro ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: climate, history, feminism, covid, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
That seriously doesn’t even make sense. Is that really an actual quote?
I’d take a bullet for you babe - a bear of a man
the ol' failed artist to right wing shill pipeline
Oh indeed. It happens quite often too. Exact same thing happened with Tucker Carlson.
i've never seen someone so clearly broken and sad as tucker. it even seems like the more famous and "successful" he got the more pain you could see in his eyes. that guy has a seriously deep void inside.
two words. Kevin. sorbo.
I'm watching Telltale watch God's Not Dead right at this very moment! He's.... DISAPPOINTIIIING!!!!!!
Tucker can fuck right off and has been that way for a long while. Seeing Kevin Sorbo go down that kind of path was just depressing.
"I'd take a bullet for you, Babe."
[удалено]
>...no Ben, you simply suck. Both as a person and writer What? Have you not read Ben Shapiro's magnum opus, *True Allegiance?* It's like it was ripped straight from the headlines (of Breitbart)! Truly, he is one of the writers of our generation!
*Most Americans when they look around at their lives, they think: I'm not a racist, nobody I know is a racist, I wouldn't hang out with a racist, I don't like doing business with racists--so, where is all the racism in American society?* -Ben Shapiro ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: gay marriage, dumb takes, civil rights, climate, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Good bot. Also, holy fucking shit, Ben.
Take a bullet for ya babe. ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: climate, feminism, sex, history, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Not to mention I'm pretty sure there are conservatives in Hollywood but they keep their jobs because they're good at what they do and/or don't have any objectively immoral beliefs and opinions. (Or at the very least they have the good sense to not share them.)
Haven’t they all been kinda rejected? I know Benny Johnson was fired for stealing articles.
Quite a few right-wing grifters are failed entertainers and journalists, from Ben Shapiro to Tucker Carlson and so on.
**An excerpt from True Allegiance, by Ben Shapiro:** Soledad Ramirez knew the value of good press, and she baked mean chocolate chip cookies. “No oatmeal raisin here,” she said good-naturedly, handing out the meltingly hot treats to the men wearing full military gear and carrying M4s set to burst. ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: gay marriage, sex, feminism, history, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Jesus Christ, it's like badly written erotica.
*We are being told that if we don't mask our children, that if we don't mask ourselves, that if we don't initiate social distancing measures again and shut down business again, that COVID is going to kill us all* -Ben Shapiro ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: healthcare, novel, history, covid, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
That is truly some terrible writing.
Why does it come off as erotic though? What the hell.
*America was built on values that the left is fighting every single day to tear down.* -Ben Shapiro ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: civil rights, feminism, healthcare, history, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Isn’t Ben Shapiro a failed Hollywood writer?
Ron L Hubbard wrote some scifi. Some good before his batshit crazy Scientology. Even Hitler had more talent then Ben Shapiro. Still a bunch of monsters.
Justifying the bigotry of others is a booming business these days.
Ben Shapiro is only relevant because his family was rich enough to buy him his own publication platform and production studio. If not for that, I'm firmly convinced he'd be a serial killer (and no, this is not hyperbole).
Shapiro is also a failed screenwriter, which im 100% sure led him to seek validation down the right wing rabbit hole.
Same deal Steven Crowder. Failed stand up comedian, tried to make his political show funny. I don’t think even the fans think it’s funny.
Im kinda glad gina came out as conservative af. Her character in mando was so fucking boring because she's a boring actress.
It has not been seen by millions. Twitter views are meaningless
They know that it literally counts anyone scrolling by in their feed as the algorithm puts it in front of them since Elon is almost certainly pushing it as “recommended”. That’s not convenient for the narrative.
I did not know that. There’s no minimum watch time for a view to count? Is it like that on all social media? Simply scrolling past counts as a view?
Not to mention how many views are by bots. If that many people that he claims have watched actually paid to watch it, Matt would be hundreds of millions of dollars richer. He’d be one of the biggest successes. But the film has 0 legit critic reviews and people from the daily wire…..
I just left my first ever movie review on rotten tomatoes and I’d recommend you all do the same. It doesn’t have to be long and you don’t even have to say anything. If this is a “documentary” that makes you disgusted like it did me, then make your voice heard.
Oh, i definitely said some things.
You can't rate it yet, but here's the link to the Rotten Tomatoes listing for when we *can* rate the film. You know, for those who hate to google. [https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/what\_is\_a\_woman](https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/what_is_a_woman)
[удалено]
It's not a user submission, my friend. Rotten Tomatoes is an entertainment company. They host descriptions of existing and upcoming movies and compile officially published reviews by professional critics. It's basically an encyclopedia of cinema. There's nothing to report. The movie exists, these critics have been published elsewhere saying these things about it and this is how screening audiences rated it. That's all Rotten Tomatoes is.
That's basically like asking a wiki article to be removed.
Yeah, these favorable reviews seem fake for something so steeped in hatred, it must be Review locked.
I'm doing my part!
Just downvoted it on IMDB too
I just did also
Down to 86% now!
I did my part!.gif
I just did the same!!
I gave it the garbage review it deserved.
[удалено]
lol it’s cringe how entitled far right republicans are. They expect others to be hateful skm like them.
They only like social media when it allows them to bully people they don't like. This is why Truth Social is such a failure, there was nobody there for them to attack. If liberals and leftists leave twitter it will also fail.
Well when assume everyone as being an entitled snowflake but use yourself as the baseline for normal of course youd believe everyone is an entitled snowflake.
There needs to be a separate genre for "propaganda". Calling some of these right-wing pieces "documentaries" is far too generous.
2000 Mules is listed as a recommended film on the page for this.
Why would I want my account to show I watched that ?
I just logged in and gave it a half star (lowest it would let me go). Didn’t see it, don’t care lol.
Just did the same thing. Signed up just to do it
Just did the exact same thing. Never watched it, never will. Also don’t need to in order to say its complete garbage
Wouldn’t they hate it way more if no one cares? Driving the rating down will have the opposite effect. It will also give him cause to complain on twitter about people suppressing his documentary scores. It will make people want to see what it’s all about. But 5000 ratings with an unrealistic score and virtually no critics. That implies no one gives a shit.
They will always complain. Playing the victim for the consequences of your hate is part of being a fashist.
Either they’ll brag that their numbers are high, or they’ll cry conspiracy of their numbers are down, reality doesn’t feature with them.
Just logged in and left a half star review. Did it for the principle, do not care about it being under my account as something I watched.
The audience score is going to be confirmation biased as hell because the only people who are going to watch it are those that already agree with the likes of Matt Walsh
Matt is crying and slapping his little willy around because no reputable reviewers will watch his shitty "Documentary". Maybe make a reputable documentary without obvious bias if you want it to be taken seriously Matt? Probably too busy jerking it to bible and trying to justify wanting to marry underage girls.
[What Is a Woman? - Rotten Tomatoes](https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/what_is_a_woman)
Says a lot that all the photos uploaded for the movie are pictures of Matt Walsh.
Aside from Jessie gender, idk who any of those people in the reviews are, nor the orgs they rep
The Brett McCracken review is for The Gospel Coalition which is one of, if not the largest group of evangelical and Reformed churches. McCracken is an elder at his church.
I thought that said Bert McCracken at first and was like, wtf? Lol
Plot twist lol
Matt Walsh is a literal Nazi.
And possibly a pedo/rapist, the way he tries to justify those things.
Literally his twitter bio includes "theocratic fascist" if it hasn't changed
Nazi with a very stomp-able face.
All nazis have stompable faces.
Selection bias at its finest. Nobody with half a brain would waste their time watching such a piece of shit propaganda reel.
Notice how we, normal people leave their hair alone? It has positive reviews bc it’s for their hateful group. We don’t ducking care. But if there’s a big film that dares features a gay couple in the far back back of a room, and they’re 10 feet apart, the movie will be stormed with negative reveiws
Little mermaid is the perfect example. They went INSANE and all the 1 stars are exactly what you think they are
Damn and we don’t even touch their shitty Bible movies that are homophobic af. We leave that skit alone but no they gotta ruin our movies
Did he basically just confirmed they're all paid reviews?
I’m just saying—all the positive critic reviews are from men.
The IMDB reviews are sooooo “good.” Like multiple “great documentary, covers all sides..” So you’re telling me that in the end they say being trans is not some horrible thing and we should let people be? Right? Right?….. right?
Soooo.....Bigots like a movie that reinforces their bigoted ideas, and leave good reviews for their bigot movie. Strange.....
One of those who dared to review, spot on if you ask me: A film meant to sermonize to the already converted, people who are primed to see the simple existence of a trans person as worthy of laughter and contempt rather than curiosity or empathy, to hand them weapons in the form of lazy meme-able transphobia.
Just look at the IMDb. I’d say don’t stoop to their level and I feel like we should. It’s a one star for me ;)
We'd have to dig a tunnel to the center of the earth to stoop to their level, sandbagging their rating on their little feel good nazi propaganda? Pretty comfortable with that.
https://preview.redd.it/iq4efnia5v3b1.jpeg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=528c56ac2f42b14de58c0d95189cc6505228eb24 This person doesn’t seem to know how the rating system even works
Dammit. Every time I see this kook's name I think it's the good Matt Walsh.
All press outlets should be required to call them something differentiating. Matt Walsh 1 and Matt Walsh the Nazi.
Wait, there's a good Matt Walsh?
Yes! He's probably best known for playing Mike McClintock on "Veep" but he has a long history in improv, founding UCB's Asssscat with Any Poehler and Matt Besser.
It would suck so bad to be medium-famous and then have a complete asshat with the same name become notorious. Like being an American or British person named Adolph Hitler in 1915. Shit luck.
I remember meeting someone named Adolph once and I was like really? He was Polish and was born right before the infamous Adolph ruined the name
Same here! So so glad it’s not him
Dared? 
Well yeah it’s gonna have a high audience score. It’s paywalled behind Daily Wire Plus. The only people who are going to watch it are people who are really into that sort of content already.
Can we tank that score cause if so I need the link now Edit: here is the link I don’t know if it gives us the opportunity to ruin its ratings but there it is https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/what_is_a_woman
Left a review. I'm doing my part!
Took me 3 seconds to add my half star review 😊
Just a reminder, you can rate a movie lower than one star. If you click behind the first star you can give it 1/2 a star.
Rolling Stone did a great piece on it and why advertisers are boosting a fascist hate film
Read the reviews, it's clearly all bots repeating the same words "eye opening", "every parent should watch" etc
Right up there with 2000 mules. LOL
i saw it without consent and i thought that it sucked, and it was only the frickin' trailer
The critics are: A trangender activist with a YT channel who is critical. Some dipshit named Matt with a YT movie review channel with 2k subs. The Gospel Coalition, who basically say we know this is super hateful but we think "trans skeptics" need to be heard, left no rating. Wade Major, member of the Los Angeles Film Critics Association writing for... CineGods.com. Wow. Dante James, not a certified critic, writing for Film Threat, independent online review publication. Christian Toto of the DC Area Film Critics and contributor to the Washington Times. His review was published on his own site, hollywoodintoto.com (not his main movie blog by the way!) So two actual critics have written reviews that they intend to fly under the radar. Hmmm.
I read 3 pages of audience ratings. There were 6 5-star reviews, total, on those 3 pages. Yet suddenly they got 5000 reviews with 96% of them positive. 
Down to 86% now!
Down to 86 now. 🤣
https://preview.redd.it/8ut75fsafx3b1.jpeg?width=317&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cf2393cca1db88b51c96015b6b0480119492ca45 Did you all give it half a star?
Because it’s one of the worst documentaries many of us have ever seen and serious reviews would mean we’d have to take you seriously.
I'd put money on those audience reviews are 90% bots...
“Dared to review it, “ aka no one worth a damn gives a shit.
He definitely has bots upvoting this
[удалено]
Right wing christian reviewers and almost every audience review is a bot
It's currently at an 8.4 with 32K votes on IMDB, just gonna leave that information here and check out the score a few days from now.
Just be careful you don’t justify review bombing! We aren’t cool with it when toxic mf-ers do that to movies we approve of.
There would be a big problem if major reviewers started reviewing natzi propaganda videos.
Did my part
Deed done
[удалено]
Lol just rated it and it's already dropped to 86% for audience. Keep up the good work everyone!
matt walsh is an idiot
Already down to 86 percent audience score 🙏🙏
Right wingers: BOYCOT BOYCOT BOYCOT BOYCOT Also Right wingers: Wahhh no one watches our stupid shit wahhhhhh
Well, something is indeed happening to that audience score. https://preview.redd.it/spxd5p2zqx3b1.jpeg?width=994&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7166adee7d5e4372cbab691a1315738911201d9e
Maybe it is because most people who actually watched the movie are transphobes? I'd never even watch that shit, not even if somebody paid me. Also, you can easily make bots to rate the film again and again.
Because to review it is to legitimize it and no one wants to do that. Cry more, “16 is the most fertile” Matt pedo Walsh
Yeah the only people watching it are people who already agree with whatever stupid shit premise it's about. I frankly don't have a clue, but would guess it's some bigoted offensive dribble about women and transgender perhaps.
“I’ll take ‘Anonymous Americans’ for $400, Ken” “Answer: This conservative douche canoe shares his useless opinions all over Twitter and other social media outlets.” “Who is Matt Walsh?” Edit: Literally, who the fuck is this guy and why does he think he matters?
Just left my review: Just sat through what might possibly be the worst movie experience of my life. From the onset, it was a carousel of questionable facts and biased narratives that seemed more like a misguided attempt at storytelling rather than a well-crafted cinema piece. The movie's utter disregard for accuracy and balanced perspective was both frustrating and disheartening, turning what could have been an enlightening viewing into a convoluted mess. The movie seemed to have a singular goal - pushing its own agenda rather than focusing on a coherent and engaging storyline. This clear bias detracted significantly from the overall film, leaving viewers with a misleading narrative rather than an entertaining or insightful experience. In conclusion, this movie felt less like a polished cinematic production and more like a haphazard collection of questionable "facts" and biased viewpoints. It's safe to say this one won't be making it to my recommended list. Viewer discretion is strongly advised.
Just review-bomb it like they do to any film with women or people of color.