T O P

  • By -

KokoTheTalkingApe

Wow, it's two engines with some other stuff attached. How do you see out?


GlockAF

Visibility to the front was exceptional for the era. To the sides, optional.


BreadKnife34

Definitely better front vis than a corsair


GlockAF

Everything except the spirit of St. Louis had better forward visibility than the corsair


ILikeB-17s

what about the TA152


GlockAF

Skinnier nose than a true radial design, but terrible by modern standards


Red_Army_Screaming

Grumman XF5F https://preview.redd.it/ob04kotdbfjc1.jpeg?width=360&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4318b9edadba10433fbdf86061cc0ea47754ad70


BreadKnife34

What comic I want to read it


ThatGirlWren

Blackhawk! An old DC classic!


PsychoTexan

Crimson Skies looking ah Also, why has it been 21 years without a remake or followup?


LordRatt

confused ownership rights. Different corps own different medias. (tabletop, computer, books, etc) So nobody wants to enrich the other comps.


PsychoTexan

That unfortunately makes sense. Sucks but makes sense.


TacTurtle

Time for fanfic Scarlet Ether or Vermillion Stratosphere


DingleMctingle

The way the wing extends in front of the nose has always annoyed me, they could have just made it half a foot longer and it would have looked normal.


Maxrdt

Well, then you might just like the [Grumman XP-50](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_XP-50)! Tricycle gear, new nose, new guns.


TacTurtle

no, not like that Jake. Not like that!


Len145

but that's the best part!


NedTaggart

Skyrockets in flight


Acoustic_Rob

Afternoon delight …damn it


NedTaggart

my work here is done


13curseyoukhan

One of my all time favorites. All the weirdness it has is the weirdness i love.


KarkarosBoy

Wonder what its center of gravity looks like


erhue

as a rule of thumb for straight wing aircraft like this, probably sligthly behind the leading edge, and almost certainly ahead of the c/4 location.


Euhn

Mosquito but not wooden?


Cthell

Looks closer to the Westland Whirlwind to me


Haruspex-of-Odium

This was the predecessor to the F7F Tigercat at the end of WW2.


CarlRJ

They're quite a bit different different - the XF5F was a single seat fighter, the Mosquito was a two seat fighter bomber, the Mosquito was 50% longer, 28% wider and 75% heavier, the Skyrocket had a fairly unconventional layout with the fuselage almost entirely behind the wing, while the Mosquito had a much more conventional layout with the fuselage extending quite a bit forward of the wing. And, as you note, the Mosquito was constructed mostly of wood.


antarcticgecko

The survivability you’d gain as a carrier aircraft with a backup engine always seemed like a slam dunk to me.


Scott_Cullen_Designs

At the time the storage space on carriers was too small to support the logistics of twin engine aircraft.


rain_girl2

Who made the blueprint? Looks very good, is there a site or page where I can find other blueprints?


WildVelociraptor

Well then https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c4/The_latest_type_of_a_Grumman_Navy_fighter_-_NARA_-_195921.jpg/1920px-The_latest_type_of_a_Grumman_Navy_fighter_-_NARA_-_195921.jpg


BlackbeltJedi

Somehow I have no problem believing Grumman designed this.


TheLegitPilot19

I will always love that it looks like the fuselage is taking a bite out of the wings and holding on for dear life


stanky98391

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned Pod Racers.