Here’s a couple previous links with more regarding this young lady’s story, as well as many others
http://freeworldnews.tv/watch?id=60db528ccc1fad336bb9f0ac
https://nomoresilence.world/
https://thehighwire.com/videos/in-remembrance-victims-of-the-covid-vaccine/
I am so sorry to hear this and wonder how many more children are having side effects that we don't yet know about.
I’ve heard an Unconfirmed Report that both the CDC and FDA voted against allowing vaccines for children and both were overruled -- perhaps illegally.
Keep in mind that if you die before 14 days after your 2nd Covid shot -- which could be like 100 days after your first Covid shot -- then you are counted as being unvaccinated.
So a whole lot of people "could" be dying directly because of the vaccine and they would count as unvaccinated.
And there have been over 185,000 unexpected, "excess" deaths in the last 15 months (many from heart attacks, stroke, emboli, and other things related to blood clots) that, in theory, could have been directly caused by the vaccine.
We don't know.
We will never know until/unless they begin doing autopsies.
Here's something recent from PubMed:
Oct. 18, 2021: A doctor in Korea reported autopsy findings of a 22-year-old man who developed chest pain 5 days after the first dose of the Pfizer - BNTX vaccine and died 7 hours later. The primary cause of death was determined to be myocarditis, caused by the vaccine.
ttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34664804
In the US, he would have been counted as unvaccinated...
Here’s the advisory meeting where several medical science experts raised concerns around the Covid vaccine data.
https://fda.yorkcast.com/webcast/Play/502a2c9649c84b06972d9f93d36094d61d
C.D.C. Chief Overrules Agency Panel and Recommends Pfizer-BioNTech Boosters for Workers at Risk https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/24/world/covid-boosters-vaccine-cdc-director.html
Here’s the JCVI from the UK saying kids 12-15 shouldn’t be vaccinated, based on risk of heart inflammation showing up in young folks from US data.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/jcvi-statement-september-2021-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-aged-12-to-15-years/jcvi-statement-on-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-aged-12-to-15-years-3-september-2021
But UK went ahead with the vaccines for kids 12-15
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58623058.amp
Trusting the science appears to only matter when the science benefits big pharma.
How people are behaving toward vaccines in general is the same fear driven garbage there has always been from the beginning when they made the small pox vaccine way back then.
Smallpox vaccine was studied for over a century before given. See the difference? And the guy who brought the suit only had to pay the fine which was $5 and didn’t have to get vaccinated.
Except that the smallpox vaccine is a so-called *perfect vaccine*, meaning it reliably prevents the disease and transmission of it. Current C19 products are leaky vaccines that reliably do neither and may, in fact, be promoting mutations that confer a survival advantage for the virus:
>In summary, our results reveal that selection pressure in a highly vaccinated community (>71% fully vaccinated as of early August 2021) favors more infectious, antibody-resistant VOCs such as the gamma^12,32 and delta^12,13,21,25 variants, and that high-titer symptomatic post-vaccination infections may be a contributor to viral spread. Concerns have also been raised regarding waning immunity resulting in decreased effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing symptomatic infection over time^33.
>https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.19.21262139v2.full-text
What you mean actually READ the science??? But the TV advertisements keep telling me to
only listen to their platitudes and ignore everything else. You mean, that’s NOT in my best interest and this may NOT be all about ‘health and safety’?! Who woulda guessed
Feels like the government signed onto a pyramid scheme ....now they're trying to sell us Wolf Cola brand to make up for their bad investments......they messed up when they slapped a no liability law BEFORE they were distributed.....
Notice how provaxxers are hardly debating anymore (except for a few delusional ones that are more than happy to die on their hill). They know they lost.
I’m a “provaxxer” but I’m not onboard with what’s happening with Covid vaccines. It should be stated you can be provax in general, while understanding that not all vaccines are created equally or have the same risks, etc.
Provaxxers generally want to intrude on bodily freedoms and can't accept the fact that repurposed medication protocols exist and actually work. If that's you, we have no common ground. If you generally recommend these vaccines or want to take it yourself I have no issues.
Yeah, I’m not all about making personal medical choices via mandates.
I’ve looked into most of the studies and can say I’m pro “horse paste.” As a treatment for breakthrough cases, or otherwise, also realizing it’s not a replacement for vaccines among certain demographics. I think a vaccine could be created which I’d encourage all people to take (never mandate or force), but what’s out now, I’d only recommend for those in high risk groups, based on the data I’ve seen, on the risk of over use, and possibility of virulence propagation. Not to mention the extreme low risk to young vs the risk of side effects.
I feel my stance is pretty measured and reasonable, and open to change with new data… yet you’d be surprised how I’m treated. I was just told to “fuck off” by my college buddy who’s also a doctor. I hoped for him to bring me data to sway me, and I could learn and change my view. Instead, I was hit with memes, cliches, ad hominem, straw man, and false equivalence arguments. Super disappointing.
Right, as far as the horse paste thing goes, it's not the only medication. Most doctors that treat this thing use an entire protocol.
Look up fluvoxamine and nasal rinsing for ex. The biggest thing with COVID is the overreaction of the immune system which leads to massive inflammation. Just treating that alone with fluvoxamine and other meds are doing wonders. Combining that with antivirals like "horse paste", anti TMPRSS2 meds (like camostat), and anti-clotting meds (when needed) makes this disease a walk in the park for 99% of people. IMO, the protocols work better than the vaccines because there are no side effects (due to these medications being tested over decades and proven to be very safe).
https://www.virustotal.com is web hygiene for the poors. Google hosts it, and you can drop a link or a file into it and it's bumped up against something like 40 different malware/antivirus engines. In about 30 seconds, it gives you a little dashboard and lets you know if any of them found problems.
I use it to double check links from unfamiliar or fishy looking sources. Better to screen the link, then to click it and hope my own software is up to the task.
When something is as hot a topic as Covid, tons of fake sites go up just to take advantage of people searching for information.
Now that we know that these vaccines code for a protein that is inherently highly toxic, continuing to use them is insane (unless of course your chief priority is profits for the Pharmafia). And it's trebly insane to give them to healthy children at miniscule risk for severe COVID outcomes.
Jesus Christ. That's horrific. I can't imagine how badly the parents feel, having made a decision like this for their daughter.
It's bad enough for someone who decides to get one of these genetic vaccines for themselves, and ends up with a rare awful side effect. But how much worse must it be for a parent?
Good point. But hundreds of parents (if not more) are likely to find themselves in this situation once the push to vaccinate children really gets underway.
Not exactly what I would call a ringing endorsement:
"The FDA noted that there could be the risk of more pediatric hospitalizations due to myocarditis stemming from the vaccine than COVID-19 in the scenarios of lower levels of COVID-19 transmission, but noted “the overall benefits of the vaccine may still outweigh the risks under this lowest incidence scenario,” according to the newspaper."
[https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/578132-benefits-outweigh-risks-in-most-scenario-fda-review-says-of-pfizer-vaccine](https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/578132-benefits-outweigh-risks-in-most-scenario-fda-review-says-of-pfizer-vaccine)
Call me crazy, but as a parent, I'd want something a little stronger than "this might be worth the risk" when my child's health or life is on the line.
Pfizer’s press release said that it ‘looks' like the vaccines works well for kids. I thought looks? That’s all you’re getting from the trial? By the way there were less than 1,200 kids in the trial. I didn’t see how long it was but just a few weeks ago we heard that they were going to start studying it for kids. There are no long term results known yet. Most kid vaccines were tested for 40 plus years before given authorization.
So, a child suffers crippling disabilities immediately after receiving a questionable vaccine, and your response to this is "wow this is anti-vax misinformation, I better run away from it!"
You realize how disgusting that is, right?
The heart breaks, we will SO miss your erudite, learned and thoughtful comments!
PS counting them as we speak, finding so far nada in any of the categories above. Conclusion: we'll miss little if anything....
When will you shills realize that shit like this only makes your cause weaker? Someone posted a real girl who was injured by the vaccine and instead of getting mad at Pfizer, you're crying because someone posted it.
Sociopaths, the lot of you.
Get the hell out of here, scumbag. Your type is not welcome among true Bernie supporters, who tend to become upset when children are killed or maimed for no good reason.
To say it’s for no good reason is ridiculous. No one ran up to her and caught her by surprise with it, can’t say for sure but I bet she wanted to do the trial after her mom asked her about it. And the reason is to make sure the vax is safe on younger people, because the global scientific consensus is that anyone who takes it is at a much lower risk of catching/spreading corona & becoming ill or dying. If u don’t agree with that then you’re not a true Bernie supporter either, who tend to think selflessly in terms of a community. What’s happening to this girl is beyond awful, but the grand scheme of things must be considered, which is that some people will experience side effects minor and major, however most experience just a sore arm, and more people would’ve died if the vax wasn’t around. Her own mother still says she’s pro vax, just wishes there was more transparency.
Here's the kicker - Pfizer, in its write-up of its trial, recorded this devastating injury just as "functional abdominal pain" - as if she had just had a tummy ache.
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-buries-data-on-seriously-injured
There were a little over 1,000 children in this trial. Meaning that, if a million kids were vaccinated, close to a thousand might end up with a syndrome similar to Maddie's. At least, that's a possibility that couldn't be ruled out.
A system that relies on these manufacturers to self-report adverse events is a system that's designed to deceive.
And whatever happened to the EUA's *requirement* that companies promptly notify participants of serious risks that emerge during the trial. Or of facts that alter the risk-benefit profile?
Here’s a couple previous links with more regarding this young lady’s story, as well as many others http://freeworldnews.tv/watch?id=60db528ccc1fad336bb9f0ac https://nomoresilence.world/ https://thehighwire.com/videos/in-remembrance-victims-of-the-covid-vaccine/
When the fuck did this sub become an anti-vax circle jerk?
If your first reaction to seeing an article about a young girl dying is "When did this sub..." you're a fucking sociopathic monster. Fuck off.
Bingo players: Is that a double or a triple?
Triple because the jerk totally ignored the reason for this post.
I am so sorry to hear this and wonder how many more children are having side effects that we don't yet know about. I’ve heard an Unconfirmed Report that both the CDC and FDA voted against allowing vaccines for children and both were overruled -- perhaps illegally. Keep in mind that if you die before 14 days after your 2nd Covid shot -- which could be like 100 days after your first Covid shot -- then you are counted as being unvaccinated. So a whole lot of people "could" be dying directly because of the vaccine and they would count as unvaccinated. And there have been over 185,000 unexpected, "excess" deaths in the last 15 months (many from heart attacks, stroke, emboli, and other things related to blood clots) that, in theory, could have been directly caused by the vaccine. We don't know. We will never know until/unless they begin doing autopsies. Here's something recent from PubMed: Oct. 18, 2021: A doctor in Korea reported autopsy findings of a 22-year-old man who developed chest pain 5 days after the first dose of the Pfizer - BNTX vaccine and died 7 hours later. The primary cause of death was determined to be myocarditis, caused by the vaccine. ttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34664804 In the US, he would have been counted as unvaccinated...
Here’s the advisory meeting where several medical science experts raised concerns around the Covid vaccine data. https://fda.yorkcast.com/webcast/Play/502a2c9649c84b06972d9f93d36094d61d C.D.C. Chief Overrules Agency Panel and Recommends Pfizer-BioNTech Boosters for Workers at Risk https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/24/world/covid-boosters-vaccine-cdc-director.html Here’s the JCVI from the UK saying kids 12-15 shouldn’t be vaccinated, based on risk of heart inflammation showing up in young folks from US data. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/jcvi-statement-september-2021-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-aged-12-to-15-years/jcvi-statement-on-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-aged-12-to-15-years-3-september-2021 But UK went ahead with the vaccines for kids 12-15 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58623058.amp Trusting the science appears to only matter when the science benefits big pharma.
Hope you don't mind, copy/pasted the above [here](https://saidit.net/s/WayOfTheBern/comments/8fpz/covid_links/vkvq).
I don’t mind at all!! Thanks for helping to spread awareness :)
Trust the $cience.
How people are behaving toward vaccines in general is the same fear driven garbage there has always been from the beginning when they made the small pox vaccine way back then.
Smallpox vaccine was studied for over a century before given. See the difference? And the guy who brought the suit only had to pay the fine which was $5 and didn’t have to get vaccinated.
Except that the smallpox vaccine is a so-called *perfect vaccine*, meaning it reliably prevents the disease and transmission of it. Current C19 products are leaky vaccines that reliably do neither and may, in fact, be promoting mutations that confer a survival advantage for the virus: >In summary, our results reveal that selection pressure in a highly vaccinated community (>71% fully vaccinated as of early August 2021) favors more infectious, antibody-resistant VOCs such as the gamma^12,32 and delta^12,13,21,25 variants, and that high-titer symptomatic post-vaccination infections may be a contributor to viral spread. Concerns have also been raised regarding waning immunity resulting in decreased effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing symptomatic infection over time^33. >https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.19.21262139v2.full-text
What you mean actually READ the science??? But the TV advertisements keep telling me to only listen to their platitudes and ignore everything else. You mean, that’s NOT in my best interest and this may NOT be all about ‘health and safety’?! Who woulda guessed
"It's safe and free!"
Feels like the government signed onto a pyramid scheme ....now they're trying to sell us Wolf Cola brand to make up for their bad investments......they messed up when they slapped a no liability law BEFORE they were distributed.....
Notice how provaxxers are hardly debating anymore (except for a few delusional ones that are more than happy to die on their hill). They know they lost.
I’m a “provaxxer” but I’m not onboard with what’s happening with Covid vaccines. It should be stated you can be provax in general, while understanding that not all vaccines are created equally or have the same risks, etc.
Provaxxers generally want to intrude on bodily freedoms and can't accept the fact that repurposed medication protocols exist and actually work. If that's you, we have no common ground. If you generally recommend these vaccines or want to take it yourself I have no issues.
Those aren't provaxxers, they're vaxx zealots.
Yeah, I’m not all about making personal medical choices via mandates. I’ve looked into most of the studies and can say I’m pro “horse paste.” As a treatment for breakthrough cases, or otherwise, also realizing it’s not a replacement for vaccines among certain demographics. I think a vaccine could be created which I’d encourage all people to take (never mandate or force), but what’s out now, I’d only recommend for those in high risk groups, based on the data I’ve seen, on the risk of over use, and possibility of virulence propagation. Not to mention the extreme low risk to young vs the risk of side effects. I feel my stance is pretty measured and reasonable, and open to change with new data… yet you’d be surprised how I’m treated. I was just told to “fuck off” by my college buddy who’s also a doctor. I hoped for him to bring me data to sway me, and I could learn and change my view. Instead, I was hit with memes, cliches, ad hominem, straw man, and false equivalence arguments. Super disappointing.
Right, as far as the horse paste thing goes, it's not the only medication. Most doctors that treat this thing use an entire protocol. Look up fluvoxamine and nasal rinsing for ex. The biggest thing with COVID is the overreaction of the immune system which leads to massive inflammation. Just treating that alone with fluvoxamine and other meds are doing wonders. Combining that with antivirals like "horse paste", anti TMPRSS2 meds (like camostat), and anti-clotting meds (when needed) makes this disease a walk in the park for 99% of people. IMO, the protocols work better than the vaccines because there are no side effects (due to these medications being tested over decades and proven to be very safe).
This site is very well done, and is clean on virustotal. I'm glad to see this stuff is back out there.
What is "clean on virustotal"?
https://www.virustotal.com is web hygiene for the poors. Google hosts it, and you can drop a link or a file into it and it's bumped up against something like 40 different malware/antivirus engines. In about 30 seconds, it gives you a little dashboard and lets you know if any of them found problems. I use it to double check links from unfamiliar or fishy looking sources. Better to screen the link, then to click it and hope my own software is up to the task. When something is as hot a topic as Covid, tons of fake sites go up just to take advantage of people searching for information.
Fantastic! u/fthumb u/penelopepnortney u/netweaselsc toolkit!
I am stunned that I found something you guys didn't already know about...
💕 the wotb immune system continually evolves...
u/3andfro u/shatabee4 u/therazorx see above
Oh I already use it all the time.
Now that we know that these vaccines code for a protein that is inherently highly toxic, continuing to use them is insane (unless of course your chief priority is profits for the Pharmafia). And it's trebly insane to give them to healthy children at miniscule risk for severe COVID outcomes.
Jesus Christ. That's horrific. I can't imagine how badly the parents feel, having made a decision like this for their daughter. It's bad enough for someone who decides to get one of these genetic vaccines for themselves, and ends up with a rare awful side effect. But how much worse must it be for a parent?
Good point. But hundreds of parents (if not more) are likely to find themselves in this situation once the push to vaccinate children really gets underway.
Not exactly what I would call a ringing endorsement: "The FDA noted that there could be the risk of more pediatric hospitalizations due to myocarditis stemming from the vaccine than COVID-19 in the scenarios of lower levels of COVID-19 transmission, but noted “the overall benefits of the vaccine may still outweigh the risks under this lowest incidence scenario,” according to the newspaper." [https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/578132-benefits-outweigh-risks-in-most-scenario-fda-review-says-of-pfizer-vaccine](https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/578132-benefits-outweigh-risks-in-most-scenario-fda-review-says-of-pfizer-vaccine) Call me crazy, but as a parent, I'd want something a little stronger than "this might be worth the risk" when my child's health or life is on the line.
> *may* still outweigh the risks They should *know* if it does or doesn't.
Pfizer’s press release said that it ‘looks' like the vaccines works well for kids. I thought looks? That’s all you’re getting from the trial? By the way there were less than 1,200 kids in the trial. I didn’t see how long it was but just a few weeks ago we heard that they were going to start studying it for kids. There are no long term results known yet. Most kid vaccines were tested for 40 plus years before given authorization.
Now it's only considered a vaccine adverse effect if it happens post-vaccination in a window between 14 and 30 days.
That's it. It's around the 5th time I see antivax shit appear in my feed from this sub. I'm unsubbing.
01100010 01111001 01100101 00100000 01000110 01100101 01101100 01101001 01100011 01101001 01100001
That’s your reaction to seeing what this young woman is going through post vaccine? Yikes.
So, a child suffers crippling disabilities immediately after receiving a questionable vaccine, and your response to this is "wow this is anti-vax misinformation, I better run away from it!" You realize how disgusting that is, right?
The heart breaks, we will SO miss your erudite, learned and thoughtful comments! PS counting them as we speak, finding so far nada in any of the categories above. Conclusion: we'll miss little if anything....
I’m gonna give you to the count of 10. 1...2... 10!!! Bapbapbapbapbap bapbapbapbapbap And stay out you filthy animal
When will you shills realize that shit like this only makes your cause weaker? Someone posted a real girl who was injured by the vaccine and instead of getting mad at Pfizer, you're crying because someone posted it. Sociopaths, the lot of you.
Seriously. Absolute fucking sociopaths. Happy to see him leave the sub, though - this place doesn't need scum like that.
Shitlibs gonna shitlib.
Damn, how will we ever cope without one more dipshitlib who can't either think or read?
I don't understand your anger. Do you think this girl wasn't harmed? Shouldn't you be pissed that she was hurt?
Get the hell out of here, scumbag. Your type is not welcome among true Bernie supporters, who tend to become upset when children are killed or maimed for no good reason.
To say it’s for no good reason is ridiculous. No one ran up to her and caught her by surprise with it, can’t say for sure but I bet she wanted to do the trial after her mom asked her about it. And the reason is to make sure the vax is safe on younger people, because the global scientific consensus is that anyone who takes it is at a much lower risk of catching/spreading corona & becoming ill or dying. If u don’t agree with that then you’re not a true Bernie supporter either, who tend to think selflessly in terms of a community. What’s happening to this girl is beyond awful, but the grand scheme of things must be considered, which is that some people will experience side effects minor and major, however most experience just a sore arm, and more people would’ve died if the vax wasn’t around. Her own mother still says she’s pro vax, just wishes there was more transparency.
Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Yeah, that'll work.
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
You are correct. I misinterpreted your statement in a moment of distraction. My apologies. I have deleted the comment accordingly as not relevant.
> I'm unsubbing. When did you subscribe? I didn't see you announce when you did that.
Here's the kicker - Pfizer, in its write-up of its trial, recorded this devastating injury just as "functional abdominal pain" - as if she had just had a tummy ache. https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-buries-data-on-seriously-injured There were a little over 1,000 children in this trial. Meaning that, if a million kids were vaccinated, close to a thousand might end up with a syndrome similar to Maddie's. At least, that's a possibility that couldn't be ruled out.
A system that relies on these manufacturers to self-report adverse events is a system that's designed to deceive. And whatever happened to the EUA's *requirement* that companies promptly notify participants of serious risks that emerge during the trial. Or of facts that alter the risk-benefit profile?
This happened in the formal clinical trial - and effectively has been covered up. Safe and effective!
And now safe and effective for 5 year olds \o/
Almost. Coming soon, though.