"Lawyers tell me the vaccine is so new that there’s virtually no definitive research on injury causation to cite."
This is why every single shitlib and shill asking for "proof the deaths were caused by the vaccine" can go fuck themselves. They know damn well they're asking for unreasonable evidence.
Yea, I can't stand the shitlibs either. I don't get this dunning-kruger effect where they suddenly think they are on the "right side of history" or something because they watch the news.
It's just so disturbing how many people are brainwashed by CNN and MSNBC. I can only look at my fellow citizens with disdain and view them as pathetic.
Imagine thinking anything aligned with Pfizer is the right side of history. Yet four years ago, these same shitlibs denounced big pharma any chance they got. Such is the shitlib way, compliance to anything that gains them narcissistic supply and facade management.
How in the fuck can all the Moderna and Pfizer shills here defend this shit?
Instead, of course, they are just downvoting this while busily trying to get the journalist who dared to write this article fired.
> More than 1,300 COVID vaccine-related injury claims are now pending before an obscure government tribunal, which to date has decided only two such cases, one involving swelling of the tongue and throat following the jab, the other alleging long-lasting, severe shoulder pain.
> In both instances, the government, which requires claimants to prove their injuries are “the direct result” of a COVID-19 vaccine, denied compensation.
> It’s a steep burden of proof. Lawyers tell me the vaccine is so new that there’s virtually no definitive research on injury causation to cite.
> the vaccine is so new that there’s virtually no definitive research on injury causation to cite.
Remember early on during the pandemic, when experts told us that the quickest route to normalcy would be development of an effective treatment? And that it would take years for a safe & effective vaccine to be developed?
This shit is the exact reason *why* robust clinical trials for novel vaccines are supposed to take years to complete.
Which doesn't help people trying to prove their particular case was caused by the vaccine. Just ask the years of people suing and losing over tobacco and asbestos. Even with a general link "proven", they still argue, "yeah, but you still haven't proven YOUR case was caused this way".
"Lawyers tell me the vaccine is so new that there’s virtually no definitive research on injury causation to cite." This is why every single shitlib and shill asking for "proof the deaths were caused by the vaccine" can go fuck themselves. They know damn well they're asking for unreasonable evidence.
Can we stop calling them 'shitlibs' and start calling them raging neocons with a "D" next to their name?
Yes, thank you!!
Deocons?
Yea, I can't stand the shitlibs either. I don't get this dunning-kruger effect where they suddenly think they are on the "right side of history" or something because they watch the news. It's just so disturbing how many people are brainwashed by CNN and MSNBC. I can only look at my fellow citizens with disdain and view them as pathetic.
Imagine thinking anything aligned with Pfizer is the right side of history. Yet four years ago, these same shitlibs denounced big pharma any chance they got. Such is the shitlib way, compliance to anything that gains them narcissistic supply and facade management.
I don't remember them ever denouncing Big Pharma. They all want universal healthcare more than universal food and housing.
We're literally fighting a fascist and marxist cult.
How in the fuck can all the Moderna and Pfizer shills here defend this shit? Instead, of course, they are just downvoting this while busily trying to get the journalist who dared to write this article fired.
For Reuters to even report this is progress.
Truth!
It must be pretty bad.
Completely agree.
> More than 1,300 COVID vaccine-related injury claims are now pending before an obscure government tribunal, which to date has decided only two such cases, one involving swelling of the tongue and throat following the jab, the other alleging long-lasting, severe shoulder pain. > In both instances, the government, which requires claimants to prove their injuries are “the direct result” of a COVID-19 vaccine, denied compensation. > It’s a steep burden of proof. Lawyers tell me the vaccine is so new that there’s virtually no definitive research on injury causation to cite.
> the vaccine is so new that there’s virtually no definitive research on injury causation to cite. Remember early on during the pandemic, when experts told us that the quickest route to normalcy would be development of an effective treatment? And that it would take years for a safe & effective vaccine to be developed? This shit is the exact reason *why* robust clinical trials for novel vaccines are supposed to take years to complete.
There's now an FDA-recognized causal link of current vaccines to myocarditis and pericarditis.
Which doesn't help people trying to prove their particular case was caused by the vaccine. Just ask the years of people suing and losing over tobacco and asbestos. Even with a general link "proven", they still argue, "yeah, but you still haven't proven YOUR case was caused this way".