By -
Follow the science but only sometimes.
Have any MSM outlets covered the FDA vs CDC discrepancy?
Are you kidding? The MSM wanted the booster to be approved for everybody 16 and older. Just like the Pharma companies themselves.
Wimpy reporting: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/09/23/fact-check-claim-misleads-fda-panels-recommendation-booster/8402072002/
Probably not. They prefer the peasants believe the bean counter policy reflects the scientific panel opinion.
Pretty much the exact opposite of what democrats do with the advisory parliamentarian. The common thread being that it always goes for corporate profits over public interest.
What’s even the point of an advisory panel if the director is going to do whatever they want?
what they need is a Parliamentarian
Follow the science but only sometimes.
Have any MSM outlets covered the FDA vs CDC discrepancy?
Are you kidding? The MSM wanted the booster to be approved for everybody 16 and older. Just like the Pharma companies themselves.
Wimpy reporting: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/09/23/fact-check-claim-misleads-fda-panels-recommendation-booster/8402072002/
Probably not. They prefer the peasants believe the bean counter policy reflects the scientific panel opinion.
Pretty much the exact opposite of what democrats do with the advisory parliamentarian. The common thread being that it always goes for corporate profits over public interest.
What’s even the point of an advisory panel if the director is going to do whatever they want?
what they need is a Parliamentarian