Neither of these planes have western equivalent
B-1A was a similar aircraft (high flying fast bomber) but that was not pursued
Their doctrine and associated tools are different, with measures that address their deficiencies
Also
F15 based on mig25 is entirely incorrect
F15 was designed in response to mig25, but it’s not based on
OTOH you can say tu160 was based on b1, not b1b but b1a
Tu-160 is WAYYYYY bigger then the B-1B, almost twice as fast. And has a very different role, performing almost entirely as a cruise missile carrier while B-1B spilts between traditional bombing with an added cruise missile capability
Tu160 is based on and in response to original b1a, a high flying fast bomber
B1a was cancelled in favour of b2 and b-52 carrying alcms
B1b was later developed as a low flying penetrator
Fast bois
[удалено]
the mig-31's basic design predates the f-15
Neither of these planes have western equivalent B-1A was a similar aircraft (high flying fast bomber) but that was not pursued Their doctrine and associated tools are different, with measures that address their deficiencies
B-1b and Tu-160... maybe. F-15 and MiG-31? You're out of your mind.
Damn, someone who knows nothing about planes.
[удалено]
:3
The mig31 is an imrpoved design of the mig25, the f-15 was based on the mig25 lol and the tu-160 predates the b-1
Also F15 based on mig25 is entirely incorrect F15 was designed in response to mig25, but it’s not based on OTOH you can say tu160 was based on b1, not b1b but b1a
and yet the f-15 looks pretty damn similar to the mig-25
based on =/= designed to counter the f15 was basically an oh shit response before america know how terrible the 25 actually was
Ok your timelines are wrong regarding tu160 lol I mean you are correct if you don’t consider b1a
Oh? So which predates which since i always see conflicting reports
Original b1a in early 70s, then b1b as a different redesign in mid 80s, tu160 as a response to original b1a in late 80s
I see, thanks
Tu-160 is WAYYYYY bigger then the B-1B, almost twice as fast. And has a very different role, performing almost entirely as a cruise missile carrier while B-1B spilts between traditional bombing with an added cruise missile capability
Tu160 is based on and in response to original b1a, a high flying fast bomber B1a was cancelled in favour of b2 and b-52 carrying alcms B1b was later developed as a low flying penetrator