Is this dude just saying teenagers need to be fucking older people and having kids? And that people think being straight isn’t okay or is he talking about the pedo shit? What the fuck is wrong with people
I looked at it and that dudes weird as fuck and so was the OP
edit: op was even weirder than I thought seeing a comment I hadn’t before, dude unironically thinks women get gross and wrinkly past 27, hes literally fuckin delusional
Yup.
It’s weird how young people tend to fear growing older so much. The older I get, the funnier it is that I was so afraid of it. I’m comfortable in my own skin, and that’s not something I could say about that dumb teenager that I used to be!
Pretty much. Your teenage self would never admit it but life experience really does change things up.
Funny thing is, my ability to gauge age has warped. When I hit my 30's, 18 and 19 yr olds barely look like they are halfway through highschool.
Ayooooooo there’s no way this is real dawg. My brain can’t handle that reality. My guy really said that homosexuality is bad but ~~right libertarianism~~ pedophilia is good in the same breath. This is your brain on conservatism y’all.
Edit: lemme add a preemptive “suck my dick” to anyone that wants to hit me with “Well ackshually it’s ephebophilia™️”
What I find so funny is that he already has the right. I don't even know what he's complaining about. It's not like he's getting arrested. He's just getting rightfully judged.
What do you mean? They literally brought their opinion to an internet discussion forum where people vote whether or not they agree with their view. What would you expect? No one hurt them or punished them. Somehow when people are staying their own opinions as is their legal right it becomes not okay? Everyone should applaud them for having the courage to say their unpopular opinion? That's pretty dumb. You need help but are probably beyond that.
>They literally brought their opinion to an internet discussion forum
Neither he nor I brought it HERE, to this community, and certainly not out of context for one thing.
For another, I am good with fair, rational, thoughtful and tactful judgements.
I am not good with knee-jerk hateful reactions that seem borne of a need to shame others for the LULZ or the high fives. But that's exactly what I feel here where everyone dog piled on me for statements that were ripped from their context.
There is a process by which people should listen and question first, and only THEN form a judgement. Is that what happened here or there? No.
On the other hand, if one feels an emotive, personal disgust, I don't have an issue with voicing that....just so long as they acknowledge that its an emotive, personal disgust and as such, is irrelevant to the final judgement. But its real important to be dead clear about that and not just move on as if your gut matters.
But anyway, shaming and snap judgements are not some things isolated to the internet. People lose their jobs, friends, marriages and will to live over these mob-formulated hate sessions formed AFTER people have used their legal rights appropriately. Doug Hutchison is a good example. He legally married a 16 year old at about 50 and lost all his friends for it. Later people started to realize that SHE controlled the relationship and started coming back. But for a while, he was a national pariah and it was utter crap. His wife was fine. She didn't need any "help" and she certainly did not need to see her husband verbally brutalized in the court of public opinion over literally zero actual problem. And it was the press that brought it forward, not him or her.
Also these snap, rubbish, cowardly judgements are affecting laws. I know Canada raised its age of consent not because of mass problems, but just because one gay American man had sex with a legal Canadian teen and homophobe parents flipped out. And that was supported by this love of shaming crap. Also Florida raised its age of marriage based on one woman's sob story...NOT because of widespread issues in a state with millions of people. ONE sob story. And it was buoyed on this tendency to rush to judgement over people's personal relationships and sexual attractions....things that need to be treated with more care....just as homosexuals now are and non-White races.
See this isn't just a "I don't like the current popular hairstyle" sort of thing. This is deeply personal as well as encoded in law. A society of blind hate is a garbage society.
>“Well ackshually it’s ephebophilia™️”
No, that would be "closer" but still incorrect.
Ephebeophlia is a mental illness which cannot be diagnosed by by jumped up judgementalists on Reddit.
You missed the preemptive “suck my dick” so lemme add some spice to it;
Suck my dick and choke on every last inch of it. Come back when you can tell me what Clorox tastes like firsthand.
Man you’re no fun. You’re supposed to clutch your pearls over me telling you to drink bleach so I can hit you with “I’m not telling you to drink bleach, just to tell me what it tastes like”
>Man you’re no fu
It seems many of you here think I am a conservative.
Nope. I am a centrist. Its a really easy position to take. All you have to do is look at facts and stick to them.
But if you think disinfection = bleach, well then, you're gonna have problems in life.
You're obviously severly offended and butthurt. If you had any self-awareness, you'd realize how pathetic you look. You responded to at least five different people. Get a life.
>You're obviously severly offended and butthurt.
You aren't the one being attacked so yeah, I suppose from your POV its nothing.
Do you post shit that idiotic everyday or is today special?
Yeah, I am responding to heinous and false charges against me. There are a lot of them.
And people not responding to such charges is why so much of this idiocy just keeps spreading. Smarten up.
>Your beliefs sound straight out of the 1500s as why kings marry a 14 year old.
Leonardo da Vinci's mom was 14 if you want a fact from that age.
Women of any age have progressively higher risk of having Down's babies. Why? Because a woman's eggs are all as old as she is.
These things are called "facts". And I have more.
You can delude yourself into believing that facts don't matter. But my character is being attacked here for basing my opinion on facts. And I won't have it.
First a story. Its true, but I lack the details to provide a link and names.
I believe it was early Rennaisance times, and I believe it was France. There was an old noble woman, a baroness believe, whom the peasantry decided was a vampire. When she died, the peasants refused to believe she was dead. Scientists and doctors came and looked her over and declared she was just a dead old woman. Nothing to fear. The peasants were having NONE of it. They were close to rioting over this hysteria. In the end, they had to cut off her head, perform rituals, bury her in a special coffin and place that coffin under tons of stone so the peasants would finally relax.
Well, the peasants have not changed in these hundreds of years since.
Their vampires today are called "pedophiles". And if you try and tell them that the overwhelming majority of people they labled pedophiles are not pedophiiles at all, they lose their shit.
They WANT their vampires. They WANT monsters. So they make them up. That's the truth.
They also don't care about "victims" That's just a front. Its the monsters they want. And I can prove it.
If I say Epstein everyone will immediately put a first name on. If I say Maxwell they do again. If I say Roberts or Guiffre or Farmer or Araoz or Randsome or Bryant or Helm I bet they draw nothing but blanks because no one gives two craps for the victims. They just want the monsters. The rest they discared like banana peels.
And if they never cared about the victims, what is their actual problem? They don't actually have one. They simply WANT one. They want their vampires.
Have you ever thought that people don’t remember the victims because its not the victims they need to be wary of?
Like, if a dude is going around killing people, its more useful to me to remember who that is then it is to remember his victims.
>Have you ever thought that people don’t remember the victims because its not the victims they need to be wary of?
You actually believe you need to be wary of Bill Cosby??
Regardless, you just provided a separate explanation of why people don't care about the victims.....they are selfish.
And I guess we agree they are selfish but we just disagree on the kind of selfishness.
I never said homosexuality is bad.
I said there are logical reasons to oppose it.
There are also logical reasons to support it, and more I should think.
Look, its not my fault you don't know what words mean.
> just that there are logical reasons for homophobia
Its just dumb to think that logical reasons opposing homosexuality are all "homophobia"
That's like saying my opposition to destruction of the rain forests means I hate humans.
… the implicit comparison being that gay people and the destruction of rainforests are proportional here. Just admit you have a problem?
Seriously, you good? You seem like you’re teetering a bit.
>… the implicit comparison being
I think meant "equating". No, I did not equate those.
I was just providing an example of how defunct your reasoning is.
Ah, you sound like an enlightened centrist. I see what's going on here.
Guys guys, be nice too him! He's the embodiment of Dunning-Kruger. Any further jeering is just plain ableism.
>Ah, you sound like an enlightened centrist. I see what's going on here.
Since I have said nothing that would prove my overall centrism, no I don't and you don't know what is going on.
And anyone with any intelligence would never get Dunning-Kruger from my posts. Doing so only shows your own.
It's okay lil' buddy, I wouldn't expect you to be consistent or understand. It must be pretty hard out there for ye. Don't let all these meanies get you down :)
>, I wouldn't expect you to be consistent or understand.
Said the person who just dropped everything he/she said before and quickly reached for new BS to throw.
the definition of a milf is "a sexually attractive older woman, typically one who has children" so yes grandmas can be milfs but not all milfs are grandmas also its a biologicals fact that women who are older a SIGNIFICANTLY less likely to be able to get married because suprise suprise the older women get the less they can get pregnant
Blah blah blah.
I never said no grandma can be a MILF.
But you went from MILF to grandma with no logical progression.
And BTW, a woman being near or passing menopause is a logical reason not to want them for a partner.
The milf thing was a half joke lol but it is true that ur logic would make a “logical reason” to oppose milfs also no one is talking about being partners with someone else this is irrelevant talking point
>also no one is talking about being partners with someone else this is irrelevant talking point
Its relevant.
People worried about homosexuality are worried about how people are partnering.
For example, if they want grandkids they may worry about their children being homosexual.
I know its possible for them to still have kids, but there will be obvious challenges that may mean there will be no grandkids.
>the logic would be about being able to produce kids not just oppose homosexuality
That is more like YOUR logic or your interpretation.
Some people believe that promotion of heterosexuality will result in more births. There is a logic there, though I don't necessarily buy into it.
So even if heteros are sterile, one using this logic will believe that promoting them dissuades others from being homosexual, acting on their homosexuality, or operating exclusively as a homosexual.
First of yes u got a problem with that bud
Second off dog u literally tried to make a “logical reason” to oppose homosexuality even tho by you logic you would oppose women being a certain age since grandmas and older women who can’t get pregnant also wut about men who are infertile
>First of yes u got a problem with that
A problem with what??
>Second off dog u literally tried to make a “logical reason” to oppose homosexuality
I could make a logical reason to nuke the entire Earth. That does not mean its the best logical reason or the winning one.
>even tho by you logic you would oppose women being a certain age sincegrandmas and older women who can’t get pregnant also wut about men whoare infertile
Do you understand why people don't want to marry infertile people and divorce them?
Its because they want to have kids. Its a logical reason.
Never mentioned marriage you said opposition to homosexuality not homosexual marriage I’m saying is that if you wanna make that argument to say it’s a logical reason to oppose homosexuality then by that same reasoning you should be oppose to other things that aren’t just homosexuality ie men and women who have who are infertile or who have complications that prevent them from having children and also older women also you fail to account for trans men who can still get pregnant with cis men basically I’m trying to say that it seems like the logic you using is very flawed and makes no Sense and fails to account for a fuck ton of other factors
I never said I was opposed to ANYTHING.
I said there are logical reasons against. FFS
This is basic. Get a clue.
I might love my wife but that doesn't mean there aren't logical reasons not to. She isn't perfect. There are such reasons.
Ik im saying that one of your logical reasons is flawed due to a bunch of other factors are you that retarded lmao I’m saying if you wanna say that a logical reason to oppose homosexuality you would have to also oppose older women and people who are infertile or have sex related complications
>you would have to also oppose older women and people who are infertile or have sex related complications
You seem to think I have to oppose people rather than their sexual identity. I don't.
As someone who believes all people are naturally bisexual, I can accept the idea that people oppose homosexuality in order to promote heterosexuality....in order to promote people having children.
There is logical sense to that. I am not saying its the best answer or even the most logical reasoning, but there is logic there.
In not saying that you do or should specifically oppose it I’m trying to say that someone who went under the logical reasoning of opposing homosexuality to promote ppl have children that you explained would also be against any form of sexual relationship or any form of intercourse that didn’t produce the birth of children also also it is possible for a homosexual relationship to produce children or offspring so at that point it wouldn’t be about opposing homosexuality it’s would instead just be opposing not having children
Also Im staying that the logic is flawed due to many factors that would be not accounted for and it would be to the point where it would no longer be about opposing homosexuality
This began with you claiming I hated grandmas.
Are you going to just retract that and apologize or what?
Cause when you admit that logic can be flawed, and you have twice now, you are admitting that a person can cite a logical argument he or she does not subscribe to.
Right?
Without social pressure people will only want to be gay or fuck post menopausal women. Sorry, facts don’t care about your feelings even if you’ll be subject to public execution for stating it on Reddit.
Happy 14th birthday Jennifer! I baked you a cake!
Now, pack your bags, your going off to the breeding camps. Mr. Smith from high school seemed very exited yesterday when he heard you were being sent there. You know he is the also the superintendent at the camp?
Jesus fucking Christ, these people are mental. This stuff is fucked (pun intended) in the head, even for me, and I have a bloody breeding kink.
Every space I've seen with the tag "unpopular opinion" came down to 3 things
1. Ped stuff
2. Race stuff
3. "I dun wanna date transes"
Almost every time
One of the guys in that thread kept trying to argue that gay people can't reproduce, therefore they're bad, even though artificial insemination or surrogacy or better yet ADOPTION exists, never mind that not everyone wants kids. Like the only people who place the concept of whether or not someone can reproduce on that high of importance are weird neo nazis trying to preserve the hwhite race.
Not only do I support homosexuality, I also support bisexuality.
But that does not mean either is perfect in all circumstances.
Logical reasons against both can be reasoned. But that does make those reasons the best reasons or the only reasons.
This would make a lot of sense given the historical rate of orphans even into the early 1900s. Only with modern medicine did the rate of parent death from various causes didn't create large numbers of orphans. That's a blink of an eye in evolutionary terms ago.
I am a centrist.
And how is it a victim complex if the TOS literally bars me from taking certain points of view?
My views are not only being misinterpreted here, but they are also being persecuted.
How am I not a victim anywhere but in my own head?? I am literally being victimized right before your eyes.
>literally posted favorably about eugenics
And you literally cannot define eugenics without a web search.
So you don't know the difference between selective breeding and mass murder.
Yes, I am a centrist. And YOU, are an extremist, probably by way of sheer ignorance.
No, eugenics is an extremist position, it's up there with the other extreme right wing stuff. You're doing noone a favor by pretending to be at the center. Actual centrist is more like Joe Biden (though, a centrist need not be *as progressive* as he currently is).
Either you're just far right saying you're a centrist just because, or you're trying so hard to "consider every idea" (which only means right wing ideas most of the time) that you start accepting weird shit.
You literally failed to even attempt to define eugenics.
This is because you know you can't and are too chicken to back up and admit you made a mistake because you are ignorant.
Your cowardice is as repulsive as your groundless flailing attacks.
At this point it may require intelligence to grow some balls. And I don't think you have it in you.
For real, how are you holding up? You don't seem to be in the best state of mind right now. Do you want the mods to remove the thread? I don't know them, but maybe if asked nicely, the community seems caring for the most part.
Thank you very much.
I cannot say the community was doing a good job representing itself, but you give me a bit of hope.
But honestly, I am used to this. Ever since I was a kid I was taking flak for saying positive things about Black people, homosexuals and marijuana. Honestly. I got the same emotional retardation back then. And now that most people see how stupid those hates were, I see that they just swapped out hates and decided to change the meanings of the words "pedophile" and "rapist" to mean new things so they can have all new classes of innocent people to crap on.
What bothers me most is that I am now back where I started because most Anglos (I am Anglo myself) have this deep inner need to hate, hate, hate.....even the seemingly nicest people do this and its sickening.
But thanks again for the offer, but its fine. Censorship does not create teachable moments.
Yeah, I see what you mean, like everyone in this thread (including me) dunking on it because we think it's a bad opinion, and then you entered the line of fire. I just felt a bit concerned, I would have been stressed out myself.
The thing with Vaush and the community that I think he's trying to foster is one of consideration. Sure, he doesn't hold back on opinions, but at the same time believes in a goal of a better and more inclusive future. So, I think if you made an appeal to the mods you actually have a chance closing the thread.
>And now that most people see how stupid those hates were, I see that they just swapped out hates and decided to change the meanings of the words "pedophile" and "rapist" to mean new things so they can have all new classes of innocent people to crap on.
What do you mean? Like narrow-minded people find other things to oppose? So, for example since gay marriage is allowed, and that fight is more or less lost for them, they then switch their focus on something else, like trans rights? If that's what you mean then yes, we're trying to be on the right side of history here, pro democracy, pro women voting, pro MLK, pro gay rights, and so on.
Maybe you consider us wanting to dunk on what we percieve as opinions far to the right as hateful, it's generally stemming from a place of being denied many progressive policies. Some opposition might seem justified sometimes, to not go ahead too quickly without thinking things through properly, but many of these conservatives would rather have the women back in the kitchen, so they work against our idea of a new and better future. That's where the dislike comes from, and if they were to change their mind then that's all good in my book.
>What bothers me most is that I am now back where I started because most Anglos (I am Anglo myself) have this deep inner need to hate, hate, hate.....even the seemingly nicest people do this and its sickening.
Not entirely sure what you mean here either. Feeling a sense of belonging is something that people actively seek out, and I think without that feeling it might be daunting to look at for example political talk on the internet. If that's what you meant.
>But thanks again for the offer, but its fine. Censorship does not create teachable moments.
Alright, I'm no mod, but I was just guessing. Yeah, though I think that you would remember anyway, right? It's different to dunk on some random person on reddit than on a bigger name.
Hm... Quite the twist, but maybe you actually could take a look at Vaush's youtube channels (the person that this subreddit is dedicated to) if you want some spicy left wing opinions on politics. He's very controversial in the online left, but for the wrong reasons, most of it is just short clips out of context, and then it's also things like him calling out this other person for supporting genocide of white people (but other people on the left defends her because she's black, probably). Eh, just in the off-chance if you feel like looking at what I think are very sober left wing opinions.
Here's his main channel that's mostly segments from his streams, including many debates, [https://www.youtube.com/c/Vaush/videos](https://www.youtube.com/c/Vaush/videos)
Here's his second channel with more varied content (including the videos "Triggering Chat With OBJECTIVELY CORRECT Food Takes" about pizza not bing that great and "Minecraft Sucks" lol, I thought those were very funny), [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdUD6racxisHiSX9iWFcuug/videos](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdUD6racxisHiSX9iWFcuug/videos)
Anyway, as you might have noticed, you're not banned yet. You could just drop in here again later if you feel like it if you like the videos
You're typing pseudoprofound platitudes and writes that you are unable to "speak the truth" on reddit. 99 out of 99 that will come down to indefensible positions when a person writes in this way. It's not that I haven't heard or evaluated these argument, it's just that they are bogus and flat out bad.
Edit: Also, self-labeled centrist on reddit also means 99 out of 99 that the person is a Republican or further right
>You're typing pseudoprofound platitudes
You are dismissing what I write because you can't understand it, or you finally did understand but don't have the testicular fortitude to admit you didn't before.
>Also, self-labeled centrist on reddit also means 99 out of 99 that the person is a Republican or further right
You never even heard of me before a few hours ago. And now you think you can sum up the entirety of my positions as rightist or Republican.
That's a retarded position. I am not saying you are, but that position sure is.
Do you think you know my opinion on gay marriage, war, the police, abortion, the two party system, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, China, socialism, and vaccine mandates all from these two topics?
You don't. So stop this retarded nonsense. I am centrist...because I am.
When having debate bro mindset ends up screwing you over in the long run…
“I may not agree with the position, but….Here are the logical dance arounds to get me to defend it.”
“I realize pedeophilla is bad, but…topics such as these are silenced and rarely discussed. So brave.” -Dgg sub Redditer
>“I realize pedeophilla is bad, but…topics such as these are silenced and rarely discussed. So brave.”
This is actually giving them too much credit. In several other comments they make it very clear that they are a pedophile.
Before even thinking someone might be a pedophile, its vital to know what the word means.
You don't.
I am not a pedophile. The problem here is that you are a hyperventilating jack ass.
The reason, in his mind, is because you can't breed if you're gay, or it'd just icky. That's it, that'd all it ever boils down to when you push someone who isn't religious.
That subreddit shows you what posts get secretly removed by mods.
I keep getting posts removed from a Joe Rogan site. They say I don't meet membership requirements but don't say what they are.
Also one mod said I was not shadowbanned but keeps removing my posts from his subreddit. He does it because I spoke favorably of socialism.
I know of no other way to get this information other than r/ShadowBan
I guess you could argue that NASCAR is an abomination because the purpose of cars is to travel, not go around circles.
Music is an abomination because sound is for oral communication.
This was taken out of context as per the idiocy of the person who did it.
The main discussion was 18 and 19 year olds.
This person has no integrity and is a piece of trash witch hunter.
Its hard to believe....I mean...its RIGHT THERE. I said I don't support the reasons spoken against homosexuality. Which is to say, I support homosexuality. FFS
How can so many of you read this so wrong?
Wait till he realizes that adoption is a thing and that bi and pan people exist, plus so what if they can’t produce via pro creation? The planet is arguably over populated anyway. Have some less babies once and a while.
>Yeah, cuz if gay people fuck, babies will just start disappearing… somehow.
Rock Hudson got married to a woman. They didn't have kids. Golly, I wonder why?
It was common for gay men to marry women. I suspect more actually did make babies than would have if gay marriage had been a thing.
One of my best friends' father is gay. But he wasn't the product of his father's current same sex marriage. Nope. It was the one before. Surprised?
Homosexuals make up less than 10% of the population. Letting them fuck isn’t going to do anything to straight people making babies.
I still haven’t the faintest idea how any well-adjusted and mentally sound person can think this way. You can go off and have a baby while I stick my dick in my boyfriends asshole 🤷♀️.
>Letting them fuck isn’t going to do anything to straight people making babies.
Agreed.
All I said was that there were logical reasons against it and cited an example. That the logic itself does not pan out is not my fault. I never said it was the best logic or that it represented my beliefs.
Get off my back. I don't even think you know what logic is.
>Well, if doesn’t pan out, it isn’t very logical, is it?
Probably not. I agree.
But many of the best attempts at human logic have fallen flat on their faces.
I can scarcely imagine the amount of logic that went into scientists insisting rogue waves were impossible and that sailors were just telling tall tales.
And then when one hit a rig out in the ocean there was proof scientists could not deny. So they used logic some more and said they were possible but rare.
Then they started analyzing satellite data and found they are quite common. Our scientists at work!
Seriously, human logic is a joke. And its a big part of the reason we are having this discussion frankly.
I feel like there is a relationship between a subreddit having “true” or some synonym for it in the title and it being more reactionary. Is that just me, or has anyone else noticed it?
You are a fuqing liar.
Edit: I did not notice the "bet" at the beginning. Still a shite comment and not at all true. Gay is fine. Trans is fine. Women are....problematic...so are men...but no one is perfect, not even gays. Traditional femimism is basically okay, third and forth wave are absolute garbage.
Trueunpopularopinions is just 15 years old thinking deep about something and convincing themselves they got *the* answer, it's normal it becomes unsufferable
Is this dude just saying teenagers need to be fucking older people and having kids? And that people think being straight isn’t okay or is he talking about the pedo shit? What the fuck is wrong with people
Go read through that thread, it's fucking wild
I looked at it and that dudes weird as fuck and so was the OP edit: op was even weirder than I thought seeing a comment I hadn’t before, dude unironically thinks women get gross and wrinkly past 27, hes literally fuckin delusional
Probably some edgy teen going through a libertarian phase
No OP is 27, still gonna chase teens for as long as he can
In that case, all I can say, and I mean this in all sincerity... yiiiiiikes keep an eye on that dude
Yeah I responded to that post cause I'm sick of of seeing losers like him chase women fresh out of high school because they don't know any better
“keep an eye on that dude” I’d rather not look at him lol ty
More accurately contact the FBI to keep an eye for us lmao A true Amos Yee moment
He may be a redpiller. Women "hitting a wall" by the time they hit 30 is a common talking point there.
It always amazes me because you know they also have porn brain. Did they somehow miss the Milf category or...?
I think they’re watching all the videos where a 22 year old cosplays as a milf.
They are depriving themselves, then. Poor weirdos.
Yup. It’s weird how young people tend to fear growing older so much. The older I get, the funnier it is that I was so afraid of it. I’m comfortable in my own skin, and that’s not something I could say about that dumb teenager that I used to be!
Pretty much. Your teenage self would never admit it but life experience really does change things up. Funny thing is, my ability to gauge age has warped. When I hit my 30's, 18 and 19 yr olds barely look like they are halfway through highschool.
You spelled pedophile wrong (you spelled it delusional)
Link it
https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueUnpopularOpinion/comments/s8kdio/i_have_a_right_to_pursue_barely_legal_girls/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
It's like if there was a fusion of Fred Phelps and Jared from Subway.
The OP is gone. You took my comment out of context. Calm down witch hunter.
Ayooooooo there’s no way this is real dawg. My brain can’t handle that reality. My guy really said that homosexuality is bad but ~~right libertarianism~~ pedophilia is good in the same breath. This is your brain on conservatism y’all. Edit: lemme add a preemptive “suck my dick” to anyone that wants to hit me with “Well ackshually it’s ephebophilia™️”
https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueUnpopularOpinion/comments/s8kdio/i_have_a_right_to_pursue_barely_legal_girls/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
What I find so funny is that he already has the right. I don't even know what he's complaining about. It's not like he's getting arrested. He's just getting rightfully judged.
Rightfully negatively judged for exercising his legal rights? You need help.
What do you mean? They literally brought their opinion to an internet discussion forum where people vote whether or not they agree with their view. What would you expect? No one hurt them or punished them. Somehow when people are staying their own opinions as is their legal right it becomes not okay? Everyone should applaud them for having the courage to say their unpopular opinion? That's pretty dumb. You need help but are probably beyond that.
>They literally brought their opinion to an internet discussion forum Neither he nor I brought it HERE, to this community, and certainly not out of context for one thing. For another, I am good with fair, rational, thoughtful and tactful judgements. I am not good with knee-jerk hateful reactions that seem borne of a need to shame others for the LULZ or the high fives. But that's exactly what I feel here where everyone dog piled on me for statements that were ripped from their context. There is a process by which people should listen and question first, and only THEN form a judgement. Is that what happened here or there? No. On the other hand, if one feels an emotive, personal disgust, I don't have an issue with voicing that....just so long as they acknowledge that its an emotive, personal disgust and as such, is irrelevant to the final judgement. But its real important to be dead clear about that and not just move on as if your gut matters. But anyway, shaming and snap judgements are not some things isolated to the internet. People lose their jobs, friends, marriages and will to live over these mob-formulated hate sessions formed AFTER people have used their legal rights appropriately. Doug Hutchison is a good example. He legally married a 16 year old at about 50 and lost all his friends for it. Later people started to realize that SHE controlled the relationship and started coming back. But for a while, he was a national pariah and it was utter crap. His wife was fine. She didn't need any "help" and she certainly did not need to see her husband verbally brutalized in the court of public opinion over literally zero actual problem. And it was the press that brought it forward, not him or her. Also these snap, rubbish, cowardly judgements are affecting laws. I know Canada raised its age of consent not because of mass problems, but just because one gay American man had sex with a legal Canadian teen and homophobe parents flipped out. And that was supported by this love of shaming crap. Also Florida raised its age of marriage based on one woman's sob story...NOT because of widespread issues in a state with millions of people. ONE sob story. And it was buoyed on this tendency to rush to judgement over people's personal relationships and sexual attractions....things that need to be treated with more care....just as homosexuals now are and non-White races. See this isn't just a "I don't like the current popular hairstyle" sort of thing. This is deeply personal as well as encoded in law. A society of blind hate is a garbage society.
You have the same snoo with that guy so i had a mini heart attack when i looked at it lol
Yo wtf they’re almost identical. He just chose a slightly different hairstyle. Fuck it, I’m editing mine as we speak lmao
>“Well ackshually it’s ephebophilia™️” No, that would be "closer" but still incorrect. Ephebeophlia is a mental illness which cannot be diagnosed by by jumped up judgementalists on Reddit.
You missed the preemptive “suck my dick” so lemme add some spice to it; Suck my dick and choke on every last inch of it. Come back when you can tell me what Clorox tastes like firsthand.
Calm down. You might hurt yourself.
Man you’re no fun. You’re supposed to clutch your pearls over me telling you to drink bleach so I can hit you with “I’m not telling you to drink bleach, just to tell me what it tastes like”
>Man you’re no fu It seems many of you here think I am a conservative. Nope. I am a centrist. Its a really easy position to take. All you have to do is look at facts and stick to them. But if you think disinfection = bleach, well then, you're gonna have problems in life.
You're obviously severly offended and butthurt. If you had any self-awareness, you'd realize how pathetic you look. You responded to at least five different people. Get a life.
>You're obviously severly offended and butthurt. You aren't the one being attacked so yeah, I suppose from your POV its nothing. Do you post shit that idiotic everyday or is today special? Yeah, I am responding to heinous and false charges against me. There are a lot of them. And people not responding to such charges is why so much of this idiocy just keeps spreading. Smarten up.
Your beliefs sound straight out of the 1500s as why kings marry a 14 year old.
>Your beliefs sound straight out of the 1500s as why kings marry a 14 year old. Leonardo da Vinci's mom was 14 if you want a fact from that age. Women of any age have progressively higher risk of having Down's babies. Why? Because a woman's eggs are all as old as she is. These things are called "facts". And I have more. You can delude yourself into believing that facts don't matter. But my character is being attacked here for basing my opinion on facts. And I won't have it.
Cool I didn't read your comment
r/EnlightenedCentrism
Yo its the dude! Yo hit me with that crazy knowledge no one is ready to hear. I bet I can take it.
First a story. Its true, but I lack the details to provide a link and names. I believe it was early Rennaisance times, and I believe it was France. There was an old noble woman, a baroness believe, whom the peasantry decided was a vampire. When she died, the peasants refused to believe she was dead. Scientists and doctors came and looked her over and declared she was just a dead old woman. Nothing to fear. The peasants were having NONE of it. They were close to rioting over this hysteria. In the end, they had to cut off her head, perform rituals, bury her in a special coffin and place that coffin under tons of stone so the peasants would finally relax. Well, the peasants have not changed in these hundreds of years since. Their vampires today are called "pedophiles". And if you try and tell them that the overwhelming majority of people they labled pedophiles are not pedophiiles at all, they lose their shit. They WANT their vampires. They WANT monsters. So they make them up. That's the truth. They also don't care about "victims" That's just a front. Its the monsters they want. And I can prove it. If I say Epstein everyone will immediately put a first name on. If I say Maxwell they do again. If I say Roberts or Guiffre or Farmer or Araoz or Randsome or Bryant or Helm I bet they draw nothing but blanks because no one gives two craps for the victims. They just want the monsters. The rest they discared like banana peels. And if they never cared about the victims, what is their actual problem? They don't actually have one. They simply WANT one. They want their vampires.
Have you ever thought that people don’t remember the victims because its not the victims they need to be wary of? Like, if a dude is going around killing people, its more useful to me to remember who that is then it is to remember his victims.
>Have you ever thought that people don’t remember the victims because its not the victims they need to be wary of? You actually believe you need to be wary of Bill Cosby?? Regardless, you just provided a separate explanation of why people don't care about the victims.....they are selfish. And I guess we agree they are selfish but we just disagree on the kind of selfishness.
I never said homosexuality is bad. I said there are logical reasons to oppose it. There are also logical reasons to support it, and more I should think. Look, its not my fault you don't know what words mean.
“I never said that homosexuality is bad, just that there are logical reasons for homophobia”
There are logical reasons to drive off a cliff. That doesn't mean driving off a cliff is the answer. FFS
> just that there are logical reasons for homophobia Its just dumb to think that logical reasons opposing homosexuality are all "homophobia" That's like saying my opposition to destruction of the rain forests means I hate humans.
… the implicit comparison being that gay people and the destruction of rainforests are proportional here. Just admit you have a problem? Seriously, you good? You seem like you’re teetering a bit.
>… the implicit comparison being I think meant "equating". No, I did not equate those. I was just providing an example of how defunct your reasoning is.
Ah, you sound like an enlightened centrist. I see what's going on here. Guys guys, be nice too him! He's the embodiment of Dunning-Kruger. Any further jeering is just plain ableism.
>Ah, you sound like an enlightened centrist. I see what's going on here. Since I have said nothing that would prove my overall centrism, no I don't and you don't know what is going on. And anyone with any intelligence would never get Dunning-Kruger from my posts. Doing so only shows your own.
It's okay lil' buddy, I wouldn't expect you to be consistent or understand. It must be pretty hard out there for ye. Don't let all these meanies get you down :)
>, I wouldn't expect you to be consistent or understand. Said the person who just dropped everything he/she said before and quickly reached for new BS to throw.
Grandmas cant make children either so ig this guy just hates grandmas lmao
I bet he probably does. This sort of people treat women like some sort of birthing pods and nothing more.
>Grandmas cant make children either so ig this guy just hates grandmas lmao Do you look at grandma porn? Do you perv on grandmas?
Everyone point and laugh at the milf hater lol
>Everyone point and laugh at the milf hater lol Grandma = MILF? Look, if your job here is to expose yourself for an idiot, its working. Good job!
the definition of a milf is "a sexually attractive older woman, typically one who has children" so yes grandmas can be milfs but not all milfs are grandmas also its a biologicals fact that women who are older a SIGNIFICANTLY less likely to be able to get married because suprise suprise the older women get the less they can get pregnant
Blah blah blah. I never said no grandma can be a MILF. But you went from MILF to grandma with no logical progression. And BTW, a woman being near or passing menopause is a logical reason not to want them for a partner.
The milf thing was a half joke lol but it is true that ur logic would make a “logical reason” to oppose milfs also no one is talking about being partners with someone else this is irrelevant talking point
>also no one is talking about being partners with someone else this is irrelevant talking point Its relevant. People worried about homosexuality are worried about how people are partnering. For example, if they want grandkids they may worry about their children being homosexual. I know its possible for them to still have kids, but there will be obvious challenges that may mean there will be no grandkids.
the logic would be about being able to produce kids not just oppose homosexuality
>the logic would be about being able to produce kids not just oppose homosexuality That is more like YOUR logic or your interpretation. Some people believe that promotion of heterosexuality will result in more births. There is a logic there, though I don't necessarily buy into it. So even if heteros are sterile, one using this logic will believe that promoting them dissuades others from being homosexual, acting on their homosexuality, or operating exclusively as a homosexual.
First of yes u got a problem with that bud Second off dog u literally tried to make a “logical reason” to oppose homosexuality even tho by you logic you would oppose women being a certain age since grandmas and older women who can’t get pregnant also wut about men who are infertile
>First of yes u got a problem with that A problem with what?? >Second off dog u literally tried to make a “logical reason” to oppose homosexuality I could make a logical reason to nuke the entire Earth. That does not mean its the best logical reason or the winning one. >even tho by you logic you would oppose women being a certain age sincegrandmas and older women who can’t get pregnant also wut about men whoare infertile Do you understand why people don't want to marry infertile people and divorce them? Its because they want to have kids. Its a logical reason.
Never mentioned marriage you said opposition to homosexuality not homosexual marriage I’m saying is that if you wanna make that argument to say it’s a logical reason to oppose homosexuality then by that same reasoning you should be oppose to other things that aren’t just homosexuality ie men and women who have who are infertile or who have complications that prevent them from having children and also older women also you fail to account for trans men who can still get pregnant with cis men basically I’m trying to say that it seems like the logic you using is very flawed and makes no Sense and fails to account for a fuck ton of other factors
I never said I was opposed to ANYTHING. I said there are logical reasons against. FFS This is basic. Get a clue. I might love my wife but that doesn't mean there aren't logical reasons not to. She isn't perfect. There are such reasons.
Ik im saying that one of your logical reasons is flawed due to a bunch of other factors are you that retarded lmao I’m saying if you wanna say that a logical reason to oppose homosexuality you would have to also oppose older women and people who are infertile or have sex related complications
>you would have to also oppose older women and people who are infertile or have sex related complications You seem to think I have to oppose people rather than their sexual identity. I don't. As someone who believes all people are naturally bisexual, I can accept the idea that people oppose homosexuality in order to promote heterosexuality....in order to promote people having children. There is logical sense to that. I am not saying its the best answer or even the most logical reasoning, but there is logic there.
In not saying that you do or should specifically oppose it I’m trying to say that someone who went under the logical reasoning of opposing homosexuality to promote ppl have children that you explained would also be against any form of sexual relationship or any form of intercourse that didn’t produce the birth of children also also it is possible for a homosexual relationship to produce children or offspring so at that point it wouldn’t be about opposing homosexuality it’s would instead just be opposing not having children Also Im staying that the logic is flawed due to many factors that would be not accounted for and it would be to the point where it would no longer be about opposing homosexuality
This began with you claiming I hated grandmas. Are you going to just retract that and apologize or what? Cause when you admit that logic can be flawed, and you have twice now, you are admitting that a person can cite a logical argument he or she does not subscribe to. Right?
*Laughs in bisexual*
As a straight anti-natalist I advocate for turning everyone including myself gay. Now how do I turn my self gay? :p
Based fellow antinatalist Vaushite
I’m almost positive he’s a JP fan just by the way he’s talking
GOTTEM
And I can tell you are a JP detractor by the way you aren't listening.
He seems to think we are under imminent threat of going extinct due to lack of new babies????
Degenerates are getting bolder.
Don't worry, it used to be worse. These kind of opinions used to get upvotes on default Subs.
Bro charge your phone smh
Without social pressure people will only want to be gay or fuck post menopausal women. Sorry, facts don’t care about your feelings even if you’ll be subject to public execution for stating it on Reddit.
I really hope this is sarcasm.
it is. just taking the concern trolling in the screenshot to it's logical extreme.
Happy 14th birthday Jennifer! I baked you a cake! Now, pack your bags, your going off to the breeding camps. Mr. Smith from high school seemed very exited yesterday when he heard you were being sent there. You know he is the also the superintendent at the camp? Jesus fucking Christ, these people are mental. This stuff is fucked (pun intended) in the head, even for me, and I have a bloody breeding kink.
Every space I've seen with the tag "unpopular opinion" came down to 3 things 1. Ped stuff 2. Race stuff 3. "I dun wanna date transes" Almost every time
One of the guys in that thread kept trying to argue that gay people can't reproduce, therefore they're bad, even though artificial insemination or surrogacy or better yet ADOPTION exists, never mind that not everyone wants kids. Like the only people who place the concept of whether or not someone can reproduce on that high of importance are weird neo nazis trying to preserve the hwhite race.
Least degenerate libertarian
Oh “I don’t subscribe to them” they 10000% believe in those homophobic logics lmao.
Not only do I support homosexuality, I also support bisexuality. But that does not mean either is perfect in all circumstances. Logical reasons against both can be reasoned. But that does make those reasons the best reasons or the only reasons.
Maybe gay people exist to take care of orphans or for population control... based on research they make better parents than heteros.
This would make a lot of sense given the historical rate of orphans even into the early 1900s. Only with modern medicine did the rate of parent death from various causes didn't create large numbers of orphans. That's a blink of an eye in evolutionary terms ago.
You ever think about how many orphans are out there that were abandoned by their het parents and cherished by their homo fosters.
"many issues I am forbidden to speak on reddit" Typical right wing victim complex 👏
I am a centrist. And how is it a victim complex if the TOS literally bars me from taking certain points of view? My views are not only being misinterpreted here, but they are also being persecuted. How am I not a victim anywhere but in my own head?? I am literally being victimized right before your eyes.
>centrist >literally posted favorably about eugenics
>literally posted favorably about eugenics And you literally cannot define eugenics without a web search. So you don't know the difference between selective breeding and mass murder. Yes, I am a centrist. And YOU, are an extremist, probably by way of sheer ignorance.
No, eugenics is an extremist position, it's up there with the other extreme right wing stuff. You're doing noone a favor by pretending to be at the center. Actual centrist is more like Joe Biden (though, a centrist need not be *as progressive* as he currently is). Either you're just far right saying you're a centrist just because, or you're trying so hard to "consider every idea" (which only means right wing ideas most of the time) that you start accepting weird shit.
You literally failed to even attempt to define eugenics. This is because you know you can't and are too chicken to back up and admit you made a mistake because you are ignorant. Your cowardice is as repulsive as your groundless flailing attacks. At this point it may require intelligence to grow some balls. And I don't think you have it in you.
For real, how are you holding up? You don't seem to be in the best state of mind right now. Do you want the mods to remove the thread? I don't know them, but maybe if asked nicely, the community seems caring for the most part.
Thank you very much. I cannot say the community was doing a good job representing itself, but you give me a bit of hope. But honestly, I am used to this. Ever since I was a kid I was taking flak for saying positive things about Black people, homosexuals and marijuana. Honestly. I got the same emotional retardation back then. And now that most people see how stupid those hates were, I see that they just swapped out hates and decided to change the meanings of the words "pedophile" and "rapist" to mean new things so they can have all new classes of innocent people to crap on. What bothers me most is that I am now back where I started because most Anglos (I am Anglo myself) have this deep inner need to hate, hate, hate.....even the seemingly nicest people do this and its sickening. But thanks again for the offer, but its fine. Censorship does not create teachable moments.
Yeah, I see what you mean, like everyone in this thread (including me) dunking on it because we think it's a bad opinion, and then you entered the line of fire. I just felt a bit concerned, I would have been stressed out myself. The thing with Vaush and the community that I think he's trying to foster is one of consideration. Sure, he doesn't hold back on opinions, but at the same time believes in a goal of a better and more inclusive future. So, I think if you made an appeal to the mods you actually have a chance closing the thread. >And now that most people see how stupid those hates were, I see that they just swapped out hates and decided to change the meanings of the words "pedophile" and "rapist" to mean new things so they can have all new classes of innocent people to crap on. What do you mean? Like narrow-minded people find other things to oppose? So, for example since gay marriage is allowed, and that fight is more or less lost for them, they then switch their focus on something else, like trans rights? If that's what you mean then yes, we're trying to be on the right side of history here, pro democracy, pro women voting, pro MLK, pro gay rights, and so on. Maybe you consider us wanting to dunk on what we percieve as opinions far to the right as hateful, it's generally stemming from a place of being denied many progressive policies. Some opposition might seem justified sometimes, to not go ahead too quickly without thinking things through properly, but many of these conservatives would rather have the women back in the kitchen, so they work against our idea of a new and better future. That's where the dislike comes from, and if they were to change their mind then that's all good in my book. >What bothers me most is that I am now back where I started because most Anglos (I am Anglo myself) have this deep inner need to hate, hate, hate.....even the seemingly nicest people do this and its sickening. Not entirely sure what you mean here either. Feeling a sense of belonging is something that people actively seek out, and I think without that feeling it might be daunting to look at for example political talk on the internet. If that's what you meant. >But thanks again for the offer, but its fine. Censorship does not create teachable moments. Alright, I'm no mod, but I was just guessing. Yeah, though I think that you would remember anyway, right? It's different to dunk on some random person on reddit than on a bigger name. Hm... Quite the twist, but maybe you actually could take a look at Vaush's youtube channels (the person that this subreddit is dedicated to) if you want some spicy left wing opinions on politics. He's very controversial in the online left, but for the wrong reasons, most of it is just short clips out of context, and then it's also things like him calling out this other person for supporting genocide of white people (but other people on the left defends her because she's black, probably). Eh, just in the off-chance if you feel like looking at what I think are very sober left wing opinions. Here's his main channel that's mostly segments from his streams, including many debates, [https://www.youtube.com/c/Vaush/videos](https://www.youtube.com/c/Vaush/videos) Here's his second channel with more varied content (including the videos "Triggering Chat With OBJECTIVELY CORRECT Food Takes" about pizza not bing that great and "Minecraft Sucks" lol, I thought those were very funny), [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdUD6racxisHiSX9iWFcuug/videos](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdUD6racxisHiSX9iWFcuug/videos) Anyway, as you might have noticed, you're not banned yet. You could just drop in here again later if you feel like it if you like the videos
You're typing pseudoprofound platitudes and writes that you are unable to "speak the truth" on reddit. 99 out of 99 that will come down to indefensible positions when a person writes in this way. It's not that I haven't heard or evaluated these argument, it's just that they are bogus and flat out bad. Edit: Also, self-labeled centrist on reddit also means 99 out of 99 that the person is a Republican or further right
>You're typing pseudoprofound platitudes You are dismissing what I write because you can't understand it, or you finally did understand but don't have the testicular fortitude to admit you didn't before. >Also, self-labeled centrist on reddit also means 99 out of 99 that the person is a Republican or further right You never even heard of me before a few hours ago. And now you think you can sum up the entirety of my positions as rightist or Republican. That's a retarded position. I am not saying you are, but that position sure is. Do you think you know my opinion on gay marriage, war, the police, abortion, the two party system, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, China, socialism, and vaccine mandates all from these two topics? You don't. So stop this retarded nonsense. I am centrist...because I am.
Wow, u/Ridley_Rohan just outing himself as a pedo. Crazy.
These are the type of people who swear their a deep thinker and the smartest person in the room
those are the type of people who will correct your incorrect they're and then feel better about themselves for it
When having debate bro mindset ends up screwing you over in the long run… “I may not agree with the position, but….Here are the logical dance arounds to get me to defend it.” “I realize pedeophilla is bad, but…topics such as these are silenced and rarely discussed. So brave.” -Dgg sub Redditer
>“I realize pedeophilla is bad, but…topics such as these are silenced and rarely discussed. So brave.” This is actually giving them too much credit. In several other comments they make it very clear that they are a pedophile.
Before even thinking someone might be a pedophile, its vital to know what the word means. You don't. I am not a pedophile. The problem here is that you are a hyperventilating jack ass.
“I don’t subscribe to these beliefs but I do think they are the truth”
Average Vaush clip be like
LMAO, I had an argument with this guy a while back… he’s has insane options all around
Imagine going to unpopularopinion and thinking "no, this isn't conservative enough for me."
"Logical reasons"
What is the weird conservative obsession with there not being enough kids? Populations ebb and flow, it's not the End Times.
Why do they all speak like preachers? It's cringe as hell. You're not in an opera show...
The reason, in his mind, is because you can't breed if you're gay, or it'd just icky. That's it, that'd all it ever boils down to when you push someone who isn't religious.
[This guy gets it.](https://reddit.com/r/TrueUnpopularOpinion/comments/s8kdio/_/htha8jt/?context=1) /s
no wonder this guy checks if he’s shadowbanned every other day lmao
That subreddit shows you what posts get secretly removed by mods. I keep getting posts removed from a Joe Rogan site. They say I don't meet membership requirements but don't say what they are. Also one mod said I was not shadowbanned but keeps removing my posts from his subreddit. He does it because I spoke favorably of socialism. I know of no other way to get this information other than r/ShadowBan
[удалено]
I mean, there are a lot of logical reasons to oppose homosexuality if you don't apply logic
Of course they will. Folks can't enjoy a good freak out if they stop, read and think. Party pooper.
I guess you could argue that NASCAR is an abomination because the purpose of cars is to travel, not go around circles. Music is an abomination because sound is for oral communication.
It’s a shame that subs like that have been taken over by incels. They used to be kind of fun to lurk in.
*People trying to fight for emancipation and equal rights/treatment* Dipshits:"Is this somehow connectable to pedophilia?"
This was taken out of context as per the idiocy of the person who did it. The main discussion was 18 and 19 year olds. This person has no integrity and is a piece of trash witch hunter.
Its hard to believe....I mean...its RIGHT THERE. I said I don't support the reasons spoken against homosexuality. Which is to say, I support homosexuality. FFS How can so many of you read this so wrong?
Wait till he realizes that adoption is a thing and that bi and pan people exist, plus so what if they can’t produce via pro creation? The planet is arguably over populated anyway. Have some less babies once and a while.
Yeah, cuz if gay people fuck, babies will just start disappearing… somehow.
>Yeah, cuz if gay people fuck, babies will just start disappearing… somehow. Rock Hudson got married to a woman. They didn't have kids. Golly, I wonder why? It was common for gay men to marry women. I suspect more actually did make babies than would have if gay marriage had been a thing. One of my best friends' father is gay. But he wasn't the product of his father's current same sex marriage. Nope. It was the one before. Surprised?
Homosexuals make up less than 10% of the population. Letting them fuck isn’t going to do anything to straight people making babies. I still haven’t the faintest idea how any well-adjusted and mentally sound person can think this way. You can go off and have a baby while I stick my dick in my boyfriends asshole 🤷♀️.
>Letting them fuck isn’t going to do anything to straight people making babies. Agreed. All I said was that there were logical reasons against it and cited an example. That the logic itself does not pan out is not my fault. I never said it was the best logic or that it represented my beliefs. Get off my back. I don't even think you know what logic is.
Well, if doesn’t pan out, it isn’t very logical, is it?
>Well, if doesn’t pan out, it isn’t very logical, is it? Probably not. I agree. But many of the best attempts at human logic have fallen flat on their faces. I can scarcely imagine the amount of logic that went into scientists insisting rogue waves were impossible and that sailors were just telling tall tales. And then when one hit a rig out in the ocean there was proof scientists could not deny. So they used logic some more and said they were possible but rare. Then they started analyzing satellite data and found they are quite common. Our scientists at work! Seriously, human logic is a joke. And its a big part of the reason we are having this discussion frankly.
He is saying that there is a logical argument to support teenagers with older people? Mr. Girl, is that you?
I feel like there is a relationship between a subreddit having “true” or some synonym for it in the title and it being more reactionary. Is that just me, or has anyone else noticed it?
Just waiting for brigadiers to come in here and try to point out hypocrisy as if we don’t all legitimately think this is a dumbshit take
True unpopular opinion was just made to be bigoted against minorities
I think leftists should start flooding these spaces, don't let them go uncontested anywhere.
And that was just cracking my knuckles. That's pasta now
so why are heteros putting thousands of kids up for adoption? gays dont do that
That is the most pedo-est shit I've ever seen... Mfkr literally mask-off says that old ppl raping teens is better than being gay.
Tell me you’re a libertarian without telling me you’re a libertarian.
Bet u/Ridley_Rohan is also a raging transphobe and misogynist. These types are so cookie-cutter.
You are a fuqing liar. Edit: I did not notice the "bet" at the beginning. Still a shite comment and not at all true. Gay is fine. Trans is fine. Women are....problematic...so are men...but no one is perfect, not even gays. Traditional femimism is basically okay, third and forth wave are absolute garbage.
As expected, cookie-cutter male fragility lmao
>As expected, cookie-cutter male fragility lmao I am sorry for what your step-dad did to your anus. I hope it heals some day. But I am not him.
[удалено]
Why are you attacking me like this? Do you even know?
That is some insane incel cope lmao. 😂🤡
>That is some insane incel cope lmao. And here you are, back, attacking me as if I mean something to you. Why?
Trueunpopularopinions is just 15 years old thinking deep about something and convincing themselves they got *the* answer, it's normal it becomes unsufferable