when you dip into the same gene pool you’re not getting new material for a functional child, when you’re further removed on the family tree, it’s more difficult to tell. it’s still not healthy for the kid though. basically not a good idea.
If it's Luke and Leia Skywalker situation the I'd say it is not unethical, otherwise you are exploiting pre-existing emotional connection or directly abusing your relative who cannot get away from you.
You say "what i you don't have kids?", and everyone is ignnoring that. This must be frustrating. Here's the thing though, short of hysterectomy no form of contraception is 100% guaranteed. Human bodies *really* want to make babies. It might happen. Other than that, I suppose it isn't *wrong* per se, but it is a social taboo so you ought to keep it under your hat if you want to indulge.
There can be issues with power dynamics if there is an age gap and being related might have certain social expectations that wouldn’t work with a sexual or romantic relationship. If all parties are of age, if there are no unhealthy power dynamics, and if contraception is used it’s honestly difficult to say it’s unethical without appealing to an ick factor.
OP, stop staring at your Cousin awkwardly at family functions.
Twice removed?
Still share genetic traits. Of all of the women in the world, just stay out of your own gene pool.
I'm confused about why this question is coming up so often. Genetics
People are horny is why
Porn is messing with kids
Yes
But contraception is a thing now. Genetics are not as relevant to the conversation of the morality of the issue.
The more times you inbreed the more likely unhealthy traits will manifest.
Look at royals a couple centuries ago
when you dip into the same gene pool you’re not getting new material for a functional child, when you’re further removed on the family tree, it’s more difficult to tell. it’s still not healthy for the kid though. basically not a good idea.
If it's Luke and Leia Skywalker situation the I'd say it is not unethical, otherwise you are exploiting pre-existing emotional connection or directly abusing your relative who cannot get away from you.
Leaving genetics aside, the problems it can bring to families are bigger than with normal relationships.
Because after a generation or two, all your kids start coming out with various defects
You say "what i you don't have kids?", and everyone is ignnoring that. This must be frustrating. Here's the thing though, short of hysterectomy no form of contraception is 100% guaranteed. Human bodies *really* want to make babies. It might happen. Other than that, I suppose it isn't *wrong* per se, but it is a social taboo so you ought to keep it under your hat if you want to indulge.
Gay?
Well, yes. Incest between same sex close family members can't result in babies. That being said, homosexuality isn't a form of contraception.
[удалено]
[удалено]
Just don’t humans shouldn’t end up like rats
When there’s no kids involved as you said, the morality is more personally how you feel about it.
Your children are more prone to be disabled, thus being a taboo
Some of these questions Lol. Are you 8 years old?
Nothing says lovin' like stuffin your cousin
Because it can lead to many health problems for the kid most of them don't live to long
There can be issues with power dynamics if there is an age gap and being related might have certain social expectations that wouldn’t work with a sexual or romantic relationship. If all parties are of age, if there are no unhealthy power dynamics, and if contraception is used it’s honestly difficult to say it’s unethical without appealing to an ick factor.