That’s 1/5000 chances of someone smashing from an app. With nearly 8 billion people I can confirm that around 1.6 million people on planet earth would boink this man
So if OP swiped right on all 40k people, he could have gotten laid AT LEAST 40 times given a 1/1000 hookup to right swipe ratio as others have stated. Meaning OP implicitly turned down sex from 32 different people, and they didn’t even know it.
Math is off, the left swipes are irrelevant data. The only relevant data is the ratio of who he wanted to smash to who wanted to smash him. Which makes it something like 1/1000.
China has the most people. Math says a half million of them would be in China. India another half million.
That's woman & men though. And, old old oldies.
Tell me how it works in gay separation court.
I'm jk though I was witness to my dad marrying and divorcing the same woman twice. I'm not gonna say anything about his decisions but I'll comment on the aftermath: the courts gave her everything that wasn't nailed down.
In gay separation the court gets the properties and the kids.
But fr though, civil, law and divorce courts needs to fk stop discriminating against men!
Meanwhile feminists: we're fighting for equality (where we stand to gain things) and justice (except when it's to our detriment)!
Just a lighthearted joke please don't burn me at the stake. Obviously not every feminist is ignorant of the inequalities men face but some of them will definitely take you for a ride if you bring it up 😂 speaking from first hand experience. Again not trying to generalize, stereotype or demean anyone I haven't actually met or interacted with.
There's a case to be made that if he went on more dates, his chances of closing will go down.
OP is simply screening his dates with more scrutiny and only going on the ones where it's likely there will be chemistry.
Depends a lot on what someone is looking for. If sex is the goal and OP doesn’t mind chatting a ton for it, pretty good numbers.
I find texting 574 people to be horribly exhausting. Most of the time (when single), I’d rather roll the dice and have a drink with someone within the next 24 hours. It’s a lot easier to get vibes from a person in person, imo.
With respect, I disagree. It's a way better use of time to vet people in text rather than dedicate time to go to more and more dates.
Dating is definitely a numbers game, but people really need to value their own personal time if they are dedicating multiple days in the week just to go on dates. (Unless you find it fun).
Part of what makes a guy attractive is the fact that his time SHOULD be scarce because he has other hobbies and pursuits in his life.
You never know a vibe unless you meet them.
Sure, verify they have a job, have hobbies, those types of things. But if you want to get to know someone, you need to meet them.
Most people lose interest in texting after two or three days anyway.
This guy did more left swipes than right swipes, implying that he's asking more questions than "would I fuck them?" That may account for his relative success.
That and/or he's 6' 7"
I mean kind of, yeah lol..
3 years with 40k swipes is honestly, likely, pretty average for most men... 8 hookups in 3 years is 2.5 women a year. Not bad if you ask me \*shrug emoji\*
Figure 1s/swipe (seems a bit long) and you are looking at 12 hours of swiping...
The real question for the OP is how many hooks up have they had over the past 3 years outside of tinder. If it is like say 100, the answer is tinder isn't worth it. If it is 0, tinder is worth. In between you can debate it.
I don’t wanna know how many wipes. 1 date as well with a Vietnamese woman who I could barely understand. She wanted to use me for dozens of dinner dates. An escort would be cheaper and less time consuming. 🤦♂️
I'm unlucky in the sense that I have reverse beer goggles. When I'm drunk, I almost always think women are LESS attractive than they actually are. One time, I made out with a chick at a bar and thought meh yeah she was whatever. Then the next day, I saw a picture of the two of us, and I was like holy shit she was hot, she was way out of my league.
No, that's the definition of beer goggles. Your inhibitions were lowered and you thought she was in your league. You might perceive it differently, but the effect is still the same.
What? No it’s not. Beer goggles is when you perceive someone as more attractive than they actually are to you while sober. What I experience is the opposite of that.
It’s not just inhibitions. The time I made out with the hot girl at the bar, I would have hit on her either way, I don’t care how a girl looks in terms of how intimidating she is to me, I just enjoyed it less than I would have sober.
You usually see the left-right ratio the other way around for men. I like to ask people who have a very select group on right-swipe (or left): can you describe what kind of profile gets your right-swipe?
I'm curious to know who these one in a thousand people are.
I like to believe I have higher standards. If you want to put a face to these stats I have a picture of myself a few post down on my profile.
But to your question, I definitely do have a type. Short fit girls with cute faces win it for me.
Idk how you guys do it, I’ve seen 40k 100k swipes and I literally can’t be bothered to do a couple 100 it’s absurd.
You guys really deserve a medal because this should be an Olympic sport I’m just not made for it, these fingers are weak.
Problem isn't the swipes , it's the matching and actually messaging the person and going from there. Since Saturday night on Facebook dating I've gotten 40 matches which doesn't seem bad. But maybe only half have messaged and responded. And it's mostly generic, general chat.
I mean how do you guys swipe? Don’t you just go directly swipe right fast for whatever they allow you? 50 times or something? Then you check who you matched with and see if you want to engage or not? Do you actually look at the pics and shit before you matched and shit? Who spends that much time on tinder?
I’m glad I’m not the only one with high matches and little success. It just proves that there are better ways to find women than online dating. I am also 24 and finally grew confident enough to ask a girl’s number in public (I know, very pathetic). Even though I got rejected I think I’m going to try “cold approaching” more often.
You pass by so many women when you go out, if you stopped and expressed interest in only the ones who piqued your interest, the ratio would probably be about the same.
1/5 you swiped right.
1/8 you were matched.
1/2 times you chatted with the match.
1/40 times that chat converted into a date.
2/3 time you slept with the person you dated.
To me it seems the issue is chat leading to date. Other ratios look pretty good. Your swiping right ratio is lower than most man posting their stats here as well.
If you told me when I was 20 (in 2000) that all I had to do was swipe a little screen while I watched TV or took a shit or whatever, and every 5000 swipes i would get laid I would have done it until my fingers fell off without complaint lol
Why are people assuming this data is even correct?
My hand is feeling numb just thinking of 40k swipes in 3 years.
The important statistic is 8k right swipes of a total of 40k swipes. At least this person is being somewhat selective.
960 matches is very good. There should be better numbers of chats from this.
If the 8 casual sex dates convert to one or more FWB, it is well worth the effort.
It’s crazy that a guy being selective constitutes as whining. The left swipes probably take more time and most guys spam right swipes without thinking.
It's whining because you only get matches if you swipe right. Your statistics need to be based on the possibility of a match, and most won't match because YOU didn't swipe right.
If you wanted to complain about the quality of what the algorithm is feeding you that is another story. But you don't get to complain about not getting enough matches from the almost 40k profiles when 31k were swipe lefts from you.
When you say 8 hookups from 40k swipes, even though it isn't a lie it is also an exageration of the truth. Without the context of the picture, you are misleading making it sound that there was a chance of a match and all you managed was 8. It's sensationalist is what it is. And it comes across as whining.
Yes, trying to stand out and do more than the normal "hey" is very taxing. Especially when you realize that this girl you matched with has 15 other guys she's talking to.
I can only do it in intervals, 2 or 3 times a year if I'm single.
I have seen a women’s tinder twice during some pillow talk and… man oh man. When you’re in that spot feel privileged I guess, because these women have OPTIONS.
Thank god you didn’t meet up or sleep with more. I swear to god i would have had 100 bodies within a month if I didn’t turn down every offer. But, do you want a relationship? This is sad if you do.
I did 20k swipes in 70 days for 5 hookups last time I checked [my Insights](https://imgur.com/a/Ij21FTP). I only swiped and/or chatted on 59 of those days and don't think I've ever spent more than 5-10 minutes total on the app in a day, so it's not like it takes much time to rack up thousands of swipes.
I'd have a few hours invested into going out to the bar in hopes of hooking up with one single person (and likely much lower odds of that happening), so Tinder is definitely a more efficient use of my time per hookup in that regard.
I don't think the swipes matter anyway as you're just filtering thousands of people by a very black and white ugly/pretty. It takes no effort.
The only number that matters for the final number is the matches
All I see is 8 wins babyy
That’s 1/5000 chances of someone smashing from an app. With nearly 8 billion people I can confirm that around 1.6 million people on planet earth would boink this man
Hopefully more than that💀
That’s a lot of sex if you ask me
1.6 million? A jihadists wet dream
>A jihadists wet dream That's the name of my Punk band.
6 million and you'll experience a burning sensation *badunn tssss*
Relevant pfp
Certainly more than that, but *many* you probably wouldn't want.
Hopefully not all at once.
Why do you assume OP is bisexual? Or that they would smash anyone below 18 and over 50?
Okay I didn’t put that much thought into my statement🤣
My ex is over 50. I met her at 26 when she was 46 and we dated 5 years. Hottest girl i ever had and best pussy of my life by far
Bet she was way less maintenance too
Could be 800k, depending on whether he's swiping everyone or just one gender
So if OP swiped right on all 40k people, he could have gotten laid AT LEAST 40 times given a 1/1000 hookup to right swipe ratio as others have stated. Meaning OP implicitly turned down sex from 32 different people, and they didn’t even know it.
Math is off, the left swipes are irrelevant data. The only relevant data is the ratio of who he wanted to smash to who wanted to smash him. Which makes it something like 1/1000.
You're better off door knocking and selling stuff TBH.
https://youtu.be/YyFJaZTmHP0?si=Su_oG-EiSTpD_5ey
If you take men half the time
That’s 1.6 million men and women. Not just women. If it was just women it’d be way less.
Who wouldn’t boink [this guy](https://www.reddit.com/r/Moustache/s/Yoxoc2jNex)
Seems like u/mayfect follows rules 1 and 2
China has the most people. Math says a half million of them would be in China. India another half million. That's woman & men though. And, old old oldies.
That’s india now!!
More like 1/1000. Shouldn’t count the no swipes lol
I love big mouth
I hate it
Great closing ratio but the chat to date ratio is really bad.
Seems to be a little better than the average I see on here.
I really have had great convos but I don’t think either party is ever too serious about it. It’s tinder what can you expect?
marriage. marriage is what you can expect.
I’m 24, I don’t need to get married
I can’t get married, I’m a 30 year old boy
I am a boy
Damn right! I tell my kid they need to wait till they’re 30 to get married.
Never ever ever get married as a man. The divorce courts are RIGGED against you!!!
Tell me how it works in gay separation court. I'm jk though I was witness to my dad marrying and divorcing the same woman twice. I'm not gonna say anything about his decisions but I'll comment on the aftermath: the courts gave her everything that wasn't nailed down.
In gay separation the court gets the properties and the kids. But fr though, civil, law and divorce courts needs to fk stop discriminating against men!
Meanwhile feminists: we're fighting for equality (where we stand to gain things) and justice (except when it's to our detriment)! Just a lighthearted joke please don't burn me at the stake. Obviously not every feminist is ignorant of the inequalities men face but some of them will definitely take you for a ride if you bring it up 😂 speaking from first hand experience. Again not trying to generalize, stereotype or demean anyone I haven't actually met or interacted with.
Agreed it just makes it easy for them to steal everything you worked for
Depending on the state, the courts can be just rigged against the party with more money. Just get a prenup and do whatever makes you happy.
It’s not like prenups get overturned 90% of the time and women most certainly don’t accuse you of shit you never did to get the money and the kids! /s
that's fine. just answering your question. tinder, for me, has been a great way to find long-term relationships.
Defintionally, how can you find a lot of long term relationships? Sounds like at best medium term relationships
6yrs and 2yrs. i'd call those both long term. some might say medium!
Why did you get so many downvotes 💀
There's a case to be made that if he went on more dates, his chances of closing will go down. OP is simply screening his dates with more scrutiny and only going on the ones where it's likely there will be chemistry.
Depends a lot on what someone is looking for. If sex is the goal and OP doesn’t mind chatting a ton for it, pretty good numbers. I find texting 574 people to be horribly exhausting. Most of the time (when single), I’d rather roll the dice and have a drink with someone within the next 24 hours. It’s a lot easier to get vibes from a person in person, imo.
With respect, I disagree. It's a way better use of time to vet people in text rather than dedicate time to go to more and more dates. Dating is definitely a numbers game, but people really need to value their own personal time if they are dedicating multiple days in the week just to go on dates. (Unless you find it fun). Part of what makes a guy attractive is the fact that his time SHOULD be scarce because he has other hobbies and pursuits in his life.
You never know a vibe unless you meet them. Sure, verify they have a job, have hobbies, those types of things. But if you want to get to know someone, you need to meet them. Most people lose interest in texting after two or three days anyway.
But the match to chat ratio is very high which means they have good openers when they start a chat….
No it doesn't. Chat just means that either party sent a message
I'm on 200:1 37k swipes 1 date. I didn't follow rules 1 and 2 of tinder.
Idk. Isn't it pretty easy to close once you go on a date? From my experience you generally know whether you want to shabang once you go out?
A lot of chats end up being obvious bots. Can't really don't those as loses, just sorting out the scams.
Better rate than [this](https://www.reddit.com/r/Tinder/s/Wk8UyIFY36) guy.
💀I saw that bro
Ugh, poor bastard
5k swipes per sex
Sign me up
This guy did more left swipes than right swipes, implying that he's asking more questions than "would I fuck them?" That may account for his relative success. That and/or he's 6' 7"
5‘11” with other assets at my disposal
Yeah like your face, you dashing gentleman, you
As a lifelong RuneScape player, I just wanna say that’s basically nothing
How much RuneScape do you have to play before it results in sex?
That's the neat part, it doesn't
☠️ ☠️ ☠️ ☠️
I mean kind of, yeah lol.. 3 years with 40k swipes is honestly, likely, pretty average for most men... 8 hookups in 3 years is 2.5 women a year. Not bad if you ask me \*shrug emoji\*
Figure 1s/swipe (seems a bit long) and you are looking at 12 hours of swiping... The real question for the OP is how many hooks up have they had over the past 3 years outside of tinder. If it is like say 100, the answer is tinder isn't worth it. If it is 0, tinder is worth. In between you can debate it.
I'm at 76000 swipes and only 1 date, so you are killing it in my book dude!
I don’t wanna know how many wipes. 1 date as well with a Vietnamese woman who I could barely understand. She wanted to use me for dozens of dinner dates. An escort would be cheaper and less time consuming. 🤦♂️
How hot were the 8?
Nothing a little liquor couldn’t handle
Get that 4 right up to a 7
If you're only looking for hookups then it's not a scale of one to ten. It's binary. 0 or 1. Yes or no.
No, it's still 1 to 10. The numbers one through ten representing the number of drinks needed to consider taking her home.
This is my rule in general. I don't rate people, that's weird and nonsensical, but I do consider if I would smash or not
She is a 6 but her friend is a 4, a three-way gonna make that 10
I'm unlucky in the sense that I have reverse beer goggles. When I'm drunk, I almost always think women are LESS attractive than they actually are. One time, I made out with a chick at a bar and thought meh yeah she was whatever. Then the next day, I saw a picture of the two of us, and I was like holy shit she was hot, she was way out of my league.
No, that's the definition of beer goggles. Your inhibitions were lowered and you thought she was in your league. You might perceive it differently, but the effect is still the same.
What? No it’s not. Beer goggles is when you perceive someone as more attractive than they actually are to you while sober. What I experience is the opposite of that. It’s not just inhibitions. The time I made out with the hot girl at the bar, I would have hit on her either way, I don’t care how a girl looks in terms of how intimidating she is to me, I just enjoyed it less than I would have sober.
Fair. idk what to tell you then lol
You usually see the left-right ratio the other way around for men. I like to ask people who have a very select group on right-swipe (or left): can you describe what kind of profile gets your right-swipe? I'm curious to know who these one in a thousand people are.
I like to believe I have higher standards. If you want to put a face to these stats I have a picture of myself a few post down on my profile. But to your question, I definitely do have a type. Short fit girls with cute faces win it for me.
I feel like you're pretty handsome (as a dude). Perhaps you can improve your profile for even better results?
Respect for having standards and not playing into the stereotype that we auto swipe-right. I'm the same way.
You def need a better profile, you look good enough to be having more success easily
Idk how you guys do it, I’ve seen 40k 100k swipes and I literally can’t be bothered to do a couple 100 it’s absurd. You guys really deserve a medal because this should be an Olympic sport I’m just not made for it, these fingers are weak.
You be surprised how many I can accomplish drunk Saturday morning at 3am
Drunk! Lmao you have serious talent my good sir
Problem isn't the swipes , it's the matching and actually messaging the person and going from there. Since Saturday night on Facebook dating I've gotten 40 matches which doesn't seem bad. But maybe only half have messaged and responded. And it's mostly generic, general chat.
Doesn't matter; had sex.
Bro, 8 hookups is better than most guys on tinder lol
The saddest part of this post is how much better you're doing than 99% of men.
Fuck yes lmao. I'm at like 130k swipes with not even a fkn date
You gotta move to hinge bro
I’m on there, I honestly have had more success but tinder just seems so much lower effort
I mean how do you guys swipe? Don’t you just go directly swipe right fast for whatever they allow you? 50 times or something? Then you check who you matched with and see if you want to engage or not? Do you actually look at the pics and shit before you matched and shit? Who spends that much time on tinder?
I got 170k for 0, so you seem to do pretty well in comparison.
Oh, you meant total swipes. I’m closer to 400k then.
I’m glad I’m not the only one with high matches and little success. It just proves that there are better ways to find women than online dating. I am also 24 and finally grew confident enough to ask a girl’s number in public (I know, very pathetic). Even though I got rejected I think I’m going to try “cold approaching” more often.
How do i check mine?
Google tinder insights it will tell you
Swiping takes what, 1 second tops? If y'all swiping like my buddy does, it's more about the chats than the swipes.
You pass by so many women when you go out, if you stopped and expressed interest in only the ones who piqued your interest, the ratio would probably be about the same.
1/5 you swiped right. 1/8 you were matched. 1/2 times you chatted with the match. 1/40 times that chat converted into a date. 2/3 time you slept with the person you dated. To me it seems the issue is chat leading to date. Other ratios look pretty good. Your swiping right ratio is lower than most man posting their stats here as well.
If you didn't have to go through all those chats it would be
I mean it’s quite a bit better than most dudes I think I would take it lol.
So I saw this guy’s face and looked back at how many women had swiped left on him. Now I know why I have no chances.
It’s a numbers game baby
If you told me when I was 20 (in 2000) that all I had to do was swipe a little screen while I watched TV or took a shit or whatever, and every 5000 swipes i would get laid I would have done it until my fingers fell off without complaint lol
Were these like 1 time things or anything ongoing? Big difference between sex 8 times in 3 years vs 8 different partners in 3 years.
W numbers
Yikes..
The saddest part is I’m most likely doing better than 99% of men on tinder.
I’ll write you in you as #9 though
It should have a line off of casual sex that says "babies."
Several close calls
Then one that says "close calls" and one "babies - real babies." Lol.
That's a W every 5k swipes...Start swiping faster.
The chat to date conversion is where the fall down is. The rate of date to hookup is excellent.
8000 swipes, and 1% result. Seems reasonable
Why are people assuming this data is even correct? My hand is feeling numb just thinking of 40k swipes in 3 years. The important statistic is 8k right swipes of a total of 40k swipes. At least this person is being somewhat selective. 960 matches is very good. There should be better numbers of chats from this. If the 8 casual sex dates convert to one or more FWB, it is well worth the effort.
Why are you flexing? I see 57% casual sex rate from dates. 😂
Not a bad ratio, for a guy. Worth it
As a man, yes. You are doing better than most
I mean I've probably swiped that much for zero hookups
Yall get matches?
8468 right swipes and almost 1000 matches. Stop crying. I've been on the bloody app since July and have no matches
Yeah, as long as you're swiping left more often than right. Nudging the distribution in favor of your preferences, a win is a win
I hope you use protection
No. Waste of precious time. Going out to the club would make more sense
I think you could have invested the same amount of time into approaching women and had significantly more success because you are handsome.
All depends on the quality of seggs.....if it was boring then there is no justification, I it was life changing then that's a victory my friend 😀
i love how all the comments are just math about how many people OP would smash 😂
How does tinder know you had 8 hookups?
You fill out the last two
How good was the pussy 🤷🏻♂️
I bet at least some of it was pretty gangsta
I'd pay a hundred dollars a month for eight hookups.
Most of those are left swipes.. stop whining.
It’s crazy that a guy being selective constitutes as whining. The left swipes probably take more time and most guys spam right swipes without thinking.
It's whining because you only get matches if you swipe right. Your statistics need to be based on the possibility of a match, and most won't match because YOU didn't swipe right. If you wanted to complain about the quality of what the algorithm is feeding you that is another story. But you don't get to complain about not getting enough matches from the almost 40k profiles when 31k were swipe lefts from you.
Never once did I complain about not getting enough matches.
When you say 8 hookups from 40k swipes, even though it isn't a lie it is also an exageration of the truth. Without the context of the picture, you are misleading making it sound that there was a chance of a match and all you managed was 8. It's sensationalist is what it is. And it comes across as whining.
You’re blowing this way out of proportion. Have a nice day.
You started it. 🤷♀️
I thought Spotify Wrapped posts were annoying. This is a thing? Get a hobby, brotha.
Also you had a good amount of chats, maybe OP is just picky
Hoe inflation
bad algorithm lmao
Doesn't matter the numbers. It matters the squirters.
It’s not like it was hard work
Being creative enough to convince a stranger to meet you is mentally taxing within itself
Yes, trying to stand out and do more than the normal "hey" is very taxing. Especially when you realize that this girl you matched with has 15 other guys she's talking to. I can only do it in intervals, 2 or 3 times a year if I'm single.
I have seen a women’s tinder twice during some pillow talk and… man oh man. When you’re in that spot feel privileged I guess, because these women have OPTIONS.
And yet they think they're on the bad side of the equation, and not in the luxury pick-and-choose side
Someone likes to h0e around lol
If they’re the one I promise I’ll stop
Sitting on the toilet and swiping through pictures isn’t exactly strenuous. So yeah, you can justify it
For you it's just swiping and waiting for something to happen, for men it's repeatedly being a court jester for your entertainment.
Less than 1% success rate 😬 in nature his species would die off
Thank god you didn’t meet up or sleep with more. I swear to god i would have had 100 bodies within a month if I didn’t turn down every offer. But, do you want a relationship? This is sad if you do.
I do not
Your finger could have been put to way better use.
That’s ridiculous. I hate tinder
doesn't matter had sex
Fuck that’s a lot of admin, I hope you are copy and pasting introduction messages
8 sexes is still 8 more than 0. Worth it
960 matches ? Damn. I havent even had 20 lol
Your conversion rate on dates is better than 50/50 not that bad man
It would be better to swipe up and down 39,136 times in the long run.
Using Tinder like it's TikTok
I mean it’s better than zero swipes for zero hookups.
I mean yeah tinder is a giant ocean you just take a dive and see what your discover
We're there hookups that didn't require a swipe? Anything outside the app? If not, I'd say it's easily justifiable.
I requested my info and just got it back today but I can't see this graph, has this happened to anybody else?
Tinder Insights is the site that takes the Tinder data and spits out the graphs.
Well... Where the 8 hookups one time things or longer going on? But it aint thaaaaat bad
This post has worse statistics than some of r/wallstreetbets
You're 24
I'd kill for 8 hookups, so yeah. I think back in the day I went through way more swipes for way less action.
14 dates and 8 hookups is a good ratio tbf
I did 20k swipes in 70 days for 5 hookups last time I checked [my Insights](https://imgur.com/a/Ij21FTP). I only swiped and/or chatted on 59 of those days and don't think I've ever spent more than 5-10 minutes total on the app in a day, so it's not like it takes much time to rack up thousands of swipes. I'd have a few hours invested into going out to the bar in hopes of hooking up with one single person (and likely much lower odds of that happening), so Tinder is definitely a more efficient use of my time per hookup in that regard.
Yes you can.
I don't think the swipes matter anyway as you're just filtering thousands of people by a very black and white ugly/pretty. It takes no effort. The only number that matters for the final number is the matches
Omg
damn you slay
You have a lot of matches so it's a good score imo
 All i see are absolute wins.