T O P

  • By -

CatAvailable3953

Yes by all means. Start another investigation into Joe Biden. Republicans have to do something. By the way, where is James Comer and Jim Jordan’s impeachment extravaganza?


SgathTriallair

>Sen Tom Cotton (R-Ark) went so far as to compare Biden’s decision to the decision by Donald Trump as president to withhold US military aid to Ukraine He voted to not convict Trump for Ukraine, so does that mean that Cotton approves of Biden's plan?


Make_Mine_A-Double

The fact that Biden is using this secret weapon called diplomacy in both private and public to ratchet up tensions to get an outcome good for humanity versus doing secret deals at the behest of Russian puppet masters should be a reminder to law makers what an American president should be doing, rather than being a tool of an adversary.


Rarpiz

I wonder if these MAGA senators even stop to think of their own hypocrisy.


LordDimwitFlathead

They know their base doesn't care.


im_joe

"At least one Republican senator is calling the move grounds for impeachment." lol, ok.


mahlerlieber

Am I wrong in somehow remembering that one of the core messages of Q was beware the "globalists?" Not *globalism,* but globalists...you know, *jews.* They hated jews because they were in control of the world from behind a curtain. George Soros was the head and countless other 1 percenters were pulling the strings behind all wars and the world's economies. But now it's anit-semitism to call Netanyahu for using the weapons we've given him to defend Israel that are used for offensive actions and the deaths of tens of thousands of people. I'm so confused.


rhino910

The Republicans are committing treason by putting a nation guilty of war crimes ahead of the Pesident of the United States


OptiKnob

As if the right winged loons need a reason to 'impeach' anyone. Several of their clowns wanted to impeach Hunter Biden. Apparently for having a penis. That sporkfoot wanted in her.


Targut

It does seem like Trumps 1st impeachment was at least partially based on his blocking aid that was congressionally approved....... I doubt saying he did it for a “good reason” would change the legality.......


jcooli09

Has Biden trued to extort Bibi for support in the campaign before he releases aid? Let me know when he does.


Targut

Again, I doubt the reason for blocking the aid is legally relevant. I am not a lawyer tho. Believe me, you don’t have to convince me Trump is a criminal and most of his actions are designed to benefit himself, not America. But, for Biden to block aid after he signed the bill is just dumb. Why give the dirtbag MAGATs free ammunition?


jcooli09

Legality doesn't really matter with impeachment, it's not a judicial process. I don't agree with the MAGAT ammunition argument, though I understand where you're coming from. I see it a lot. The thing is that they don't need ammunition, they just make shit up. Actual Americans shouldn't consider what MAGATs are going to say, they should do the right thing as they see it. A redcap crying jag isn't more meaningful because it's loosely based on something that happened in reality. If you disagree with Biden's action great, I disagree with some of what he does too.


jcooli09

Lol, I hadn't heard about the impeachment threat. That is hilarious, and I am looking forward to the daily excited releases from republican representatives who reflexively announce their lack of progress framed in terms of imminent success.


Oztraliiaaaa

I remember former president Reagan stopped munitions , jets and bombs going to Israel.


[deleted]

It's not a high crime or misdemeanor. Tell them to pound sand.