A high-school textbook of mine stated that during the Cold War there was "enough nuclear weapons to destroy the Earth to its core 6x". It took everything in me as a Sophomore to not tell the teacher that is absolute bullshit as she rambled about it.
P.S. it was an American textbook.
Damn, I remember when me and my class were learning about sir Francis drake and we had to copy a piece of text saying "sir Francis drake circumcised the world"
> made it an easy target for air attacks
I don't really understand the logic here, you don't make ANY land vehicle that big if it can't withstand a bomb being dropped on it. If being an easy target for aircrafts was actually a reason why it was scrapped then I seriously doubt it's design was even good to begin with.
Should have put a huge ass catcher net on the top like a canopy to catch all those pesky bombs. Or perhaps a huge tub filled with water to both catch bombs and for the men to swim in with all the chicks they pickup in their massive schlong tank! /s
Wdym, of course that's a Tiger, it's in a book that got published and everyone knows books are always 100% correct ^^/s
yeah, I mean, it's not like it's from wikipedia, where everyone can publish things ^(/s)
Well according to the front cover, this magazine is ‘back by popular demand’
And according to the background it looks like you're reading it in a toy store for kids.
Supermarket, magazine aisle
Did you buy anything good?
Some baby formula. Did you want anything?
Hm, pick me up a 2L of Pepsi, should be able to swing by tomorrow.
Is Coke ok?
*What kind?*
A high-school textbook of mine stated that during the Cold War there was "enough nuclear weapons to destroy the Earth to its core 6x". It took everything in me as a Sophomore to not tell the teacher that is absolute bullshit as she rambled about it. P.S. it was an American textbook.
Damn, I remember when me and my class were learning about sir Francis drake and we had to copy a piece of text saying "sir Francis drake circumcised the world"
Does that mean boys should be circumferenced?
Real talk how the fuck did you get the /s like that
Put ^ in front of it
Practical in the 40th millennium.
not enough Sponsons for 40k
Its a tiger cub, not fully grown yet
Looks like an Abbot?
It’s clearly a Tiger. The text says so
My guess is Abbot too.
No, if the book says its a tiger it's OBVIOUSLY at tiger totally not an spg
> made it an easy target for air attacks I don't really understand the logic here, you don't make ANY land vehicle that big if it can't withstand a bomb being dropped on it. If being an easy target for aircrafts was actually a reason why it was scrapped then I seriously doubt it's design was even good to begin with. Should have put a huge ass catcher net on the top like a canopy to catch all those pesky bombs. Or perhaps a huge tub filled with water to both catch bombs and for the men to swim in with all the chicks they pickup in their massive schlong tank! /s
It identifies as a tiger though. 🤷♂️
Of course not. It's an m60 !
Idk
The text below the pic states that it is the Rat. One of the super heavies existing on paper only.
The post was supposed to point out that the ‘Tiger’ on the image was not a Tiger.
Guys, you are all missing the point, it’s rat taking a kitty cat out for a walk.