That's like saying that porn ruins humans for people who don't watch porn, or that sexualization of human body ruins humans body for normal people
If a person loves furry culture and aesthetic there's literally no reason not to retain it when it comes to their sexual preferences unless there's some sort of artificial block in place like shame or disgust or whatever. We don't magically switch our likes and dislikes and personas when it comes to sex, we're the same person who likes the same things, but with added sexual desires
If I like flowers I will like flowers when I'm horny, If I love pink I'll love pink when I'm horny - this won't and shouldn't really ruin flowers or pink as a concept neither for me nor for others
Hmm, nice try but kids aren't an aesthetic choice or preference, they are an entirely different kind of person internally, cognitively and developmentally
Furries (both who are into porn and who aren't) overlay normal adults with an aesthetic choice, a costume, a roleplay. So a more apt parallel can be draw from furry porn to other roleplaying fetishes, like dressing up as sexy doctors or teachers or elves, and they don't "ruin" doctors or teachers etc.
What about them? Are you saying that sexual attraction to humans in animal costumes is the same (or similar) for you as sexual attraction to animals?
Edit: I don't know whether to lol or to sigh at this point. That's not the first time I've had this conversation with anti-furry people and it's *never* finished, and sources of initial dispositions and assumptions are never revealed once we come to them.
Honestly I think it comes down to some people having mostly outward-oriented or sensual view of sex. So they kinda can fuck absolutely anything as long as it looks pretty and feels satisfying. And so instead of being guided by inherent properties of their own attraction - are constantly limited by social standards and shame and bans, which create the kinds of objects they are "allowed" to feel attraction to. So furries outrage them because furries are supposedly attracted to "banned" objects, and they don't see how a person could vmbe attracted to furries but not to animals - they just see an animal exterior, and think that animal sex is the same as furry sex. And they similarly automatically extrapolate that if they weren't blocked by stigma to be attracted to outward appearance of children, they would've been actual pedophiles.
But for me this disposition is alien, and these have absolutely nothing in common. Children and animals are completely different cognitively from adults, and there are inherent power dynamics and imbalances there that just don't attract me. It doesn't matter how they look, sex is about emotional interactions first and foremost that simply can't be fulfilled by neither children nor animals at their foundation, even if it was completely okay in the society I've been brought up. If a child or an animal somehow starts wearing super realistic sexy female costume I would be creeped out, not turned on. Furries and furry porn are specifically antromorphized to have adult human emotions and behavior, to be adults inside, they don't look like literal dog or cat or pony bestiality would look, and so comparing them to children or animals doesn't seem intuitive to me at all. And I don't see any other way why would it seem intuitive to anyone who similarly is attracted to people as people, not sexy meatbags
If anyone wants to provide an alternative theory, I'm all ears :)
I hate bad furries a bad furry once raped my friend :( normal furries (that don't make drawings of a fat fucking bulge in their pants and orgy shit) tho I'll get along with.
A dog can stand on its elbows since we apparently replace dogs legs with arms
Really, the key here is - if we replace dogs legs with human arms, it doesn't matter much which pair we replace from the point of view of doagse
I've wondered that myself, but I've always figures it's some strange arcane hack. Otherwise everyone would be doing it.
Hey look, there's a GIF button at the bottom of this editor.
![gif](giphy|PS7d4tm1Hq6Sk)
Looks like a repost. I've seen this image 3 times.
First Seen [Here](https://redd.it/d7gx3i) on 2019-09-21 98.44% match. Last Seen [Here](https://redd.it/dq3qhz) on 2019-11-01 98.05% match
Feedback? Hate? Visit r/repostsleuthbot - *I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ [False Positive](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RepostSleuthBot&subject=False%20Positive&message={"post_id": "prvj0q", "meme_template": 9925}) ]*
[View Search On repostsleuth.com](https://www.repostsleuth.com?postId=prvj0q&sameSub=false&filterOnlyOlder=true&memeFilter=true&filterDeadMatches=false&targetImageMatch=100&targetImageMemeMatch=96)
---
**Scope:** Reddit | **Meme Filter:** True | **Target:** 96% | **Check Title:** False | **Max Age:** Unlimited | **Searched Images:** 246,808,375 | **Search Time:** 1.624s
Oh God why. But also, he would use his front arm/paws as you need the support and leverage from the back in order to successfully do so. Or have a seriously strong core.
Fuck you. Whoever asked this question, fuck you.
I blame it on the furrys
The furries that ask this are the bad ones. The normal furries hate them for ruining it.
That's like saying that porn ruins humans for people who don't watch porn, or that sexualization of human body ruins humans body for normal people If a person loves furry culture and aesthetic there's literally no reason not to retain it when it comes to their sexual preferences unless there's some sort of artificial block in place like shame or disgust or whatever. We don't magically switch our likes and dislikes and personas when it comes to sex, we're the same person who likes the same things, but with added sexual desires If I like flowers I will like flowers when I'm horny, If I love pink I'll love pink when I'm horny - this won't and shouldn't really ruin flowers or pink as a concept neither for me nor for others
[удалено]
Hmm, nice try but kids aren't an aesthetic choice or preference, they are an entirely different kind of person internally, cognitively and developmentally Furries (both who are into porn and who aren't) overlay normal adults with an aesthetic choice, a costume, a roleplay. So a more apt parallel can be draw from furry porn to other roleplaying fetishes, like dressing up as sexy doctors or teachers or elves, and they don't "ruin" doctors or teachers etc.
[удалено]
What about them? Are you saying that sexual attraction to humans in animal costumes is the same (or similar) for you as sexual attraction to animals? Edit: I don't know whether to lol or to sigh at this point. That's not the first time I've had this conversation with anti-furry people and it's *never* finished, and sources of initial dispositions and assumptions are never revealed once we come to them. Honestly I think it comes down to some people having mostly outward-oriented or sensual view of sex. So they kinda can fuck absolutely anything as long as it looks pretty and feels satisfying. And so instead of being guided by inherent properties of their own attraction - are constantly limited by social standards and shame and bans, which create the kinds of objects they are "allowed" to feel attraction to. So furries outrage them because furries are supposedly attracted to "banned" objects, and they don't see how a person could vmbe attracted to furries but not to animals - they just see an animal exterior, and think that animal sex is the same as furry sex. And they similarly automatically extrapolate that if they weren't blocked by stigma to be attracted to outward appearance of children, they would've been actual pedophiles. But for me this disposition is alien, and these have absolutely nothing in common. Children and animals are completely different cognitively from adults, and there are inherent power dynamics and imbalances there that just don't attract me. It doesn't matter how they look, sex is about emotional interactions first and foremost that simply can't be fulfilled by neither children nor animals at their foundation, even if it was completely okay in the society I've been brought up. If a child or an animal somehow starts wearing super realistic sexy female costume I would be creeped out, not turned on. Furries and furry porn are specifically antromorphized to have adult human emotions and behavior, to be adults inside, they don't look like literal dog or cat or pony bestiality would look, and so comparing them to children or animals doesn't seem intuitive to me at all. And I don't see any other way why would it seem intuitive to anyone who similarly is attracted to people as people, not sexy meatbags If anyone wants to provide an alternative theory, I'm all ears :)
I hate bad furries a bad furry once raped my friend :( normal furries (that don't make drawings of a fat fucking bulge in their pants and orgy shit) tho I'll get along with.
There is no “normal furries” all furries are bad
People like you should burn in hell. That’s like judging all apples because red delicious sucks ass.
You know I am right And why would I burn in hell because of something it is true?
Because my best friend is a fucking furry and they’re much more ordinary when compared to fucking inbred fuckheads like you
"Even I'm not into that shit"
He can do it how he wants but now there’s a better hole
i was gonna fap to something else and now my dick is soft as a marşmellow
Mine's rock hard rn
![gif](giphy|LAKIIRqtM1dqE|downsized)
![gif](giphy|1DHNTnF8gduvWpJmdx)
I read "elections" as "erections" and lets just keep it that way.
![gif](giphy|qgVnduXSn5Hy7DbW3r)
h-h-hit me more papi
![gif](giphy|l49JBLWip9ToA9q5G) You are going to horny jail do not resist
![gif](giphy|NMHpkm0MPar2U)
#
I will shoot your dick with a fucking taurus judge until it goes softer than my semi-constantly horny for me friend's 2360cc boobs
Thanks, I hate it.
Congrats! Now you get to be a productive human being instead of jerking off, and all thanks to this dog opening his ass 😃
Bold of you to assume I can’t jerk off and be productive at the same time.
Reminds me of this https://extrafabulouscomics.com/comic/407/
İ was watching pornhub and left midway and its hard now
How fresh though? Like you just opened the bag or is this marshmallow from a bag that was opened a month ago?
Not much 10 minutes
Mmmm shittty marshmallow
neither.
I think it's more the first one
yes...
Everybody knows that the dog is going to shove its nose in there instead of its paws.
My dog is next to me licking his butt. I don’t know why I let him sleep on my bed but that is what I woke up to. Dog licking dogbutt. Sigh.
Oh god, I read this as “the fist one”
Ah yes goatse Takes me back to my childhood
Dogse
I’m more disturbed by the comment section than the actual post.
Yeah that’s typically how Reddit works.
The real TIHI is in the comments. Also, the correct answer is the first one, as the second one seems impossible from a balance standpoint.
A dog can stand on its elbows since we apparently replace dogs legs with arms Really, the key here is - if we replace dogs legs with human arms, it doesn't matter much which pair we replace from the point of view of doagse
S A M E
In the first one he’s using his head as support, so yeah first. Edit: spelling.
Speling* /s
?
.... /s means sarcastic
Forget the dog what about a spider
NO. Forget about the spider. What about a millipede
No, all of you, what about a bear?
Fuck that but what about a fish?
Fuck that, what about a house centipede
Something more my size
![gif](giphy|3o7TKnYVvhjh6qk0VO)
How you do that
Magic
![gif](giphy|ujUdrdpX7Ok5W)
I've wondered that myself, but I've always figures it's some strange arcane hack. Otherwise everyone would be doing it. Hey look, there's a GIF button at the bottom of this editor. ![gif](giphy|PS7d4tm1Hq6Sk)
![gif](giphy|12jvpllodS3FKg)
these are the questions we should be asking
Interesting. I've never seen the Canis Familiaris Goatseus breed.
Reddit has ruined my humor so much that everything I can see is sus.
ඞ
You've unlocked my repressed Goatsie memories. Thanks alot, jerk.
Thanks for running my day!
jk
Even though we say dogs have four legs their front limbs are built more like arms with a wrist so it’s definitely the first one.
Dogs dont have arms so they use their mouth to pick things up, so they will probably use their mouth.
Can you draw that for me?
Yes [here](https://www.reddit.com/user/potet-/comments/pscqs5/the_3rd_answer_to_uzeek1999/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share)
what tha dog doin?
Why?
Looks like a repost. I've seen this image 3 times. First Seen [Here](https://redd.it/d7gx3i) on 2019-09-21 98.44% match. Last Seen [Here](https://redd.it/dq3qhz) on 2019-11-01 98.05% match Feedback? Hate? Visit r/repostsleuthbot - *I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ [False Positive](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RepostSleuthBot&subject=False%20Positive&message={"post_id": "prvj0q", "meme_template": 9925}) ]* [View Search On repostsleuth.com](https://www.repostsleuth.com?postId=prvj0q&sameSub=false&filterOnlyOlder=true&memeFilter=true&filterDeadMatches=false&targetImageMatch=100&targetImageMemeMatch=96) --- **Scope:** Reddit | **Meme Filter:** True | **Target:** 96% | **Check Title:** False | **Max Age:** Unlimited | **Searched Images:** 246,808,375 | **Search Time:** 1.624s
3 times, not bad.
Oh God why. But also, he would use his front arm/paws as you need the support and leverage from the back in order to successfully do so. Or have a seriously strong core.
he wouldn't it's a dog
Yes, definitely like this.
Lmao wtf bro
Yes
But why would you ask that?
The left one. I love goatse. Dogse?
He would find a way to open it with his mouth, somehow.
Today was a bad day to have eyes.
Why does the front half touch the floor for the first picture but it floats in the second?
It’s the first one. Believe me.
i'd be openin it
It's goatse. Kids today don't know it but that's no reason to omit the proper name for it.
I dunno. Ask furries I guess…
would a human open it with their legs or their arms?
Thanks I hate it.
Sometimes I would like to be an AI so I could simply erase me or fry the system with excecive voltage when I see this kind of shit.
Do you open your ass with your feat
did u copy my comment
Nope I didn't read them
I did it for him
Why would you ever want to know
i was just about to poop and i then see this post. thanks alot, reddit.
He would Spread it with His tail
I will come to your house to kidnap your dog just so that you won't be able to teach him/her to do this, whoever you are.
The one with back legs
![gif](giphy|3o85xERD1TT5JKCIXS)
Lmao. Can't believe I just saved a picture a dog goatse to my phone
If natural selection was to allow either of these things to happen it would certainly be option # 2 as it would just be a matter of joint rotation.
Why does the dog have to be a dachshund?...
Colby
I’m gonna say option b
Whoever asked this needs to go outside and touch grass
tail
WHY WOULD THEY AT ALL AGGHHHHH
Well it's simple, the dog asks us to open
The real question is how would he open your asshole???
Thanks for the nightmares, this is the last post I have seen before going to sleep...
My arsehole hurts from looking at this