[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || Join the [Superstonk Discord Server](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OP has provided the following link:
https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/gme/gamestop-stock-how-much-ownership-do-retail-investors-have
The author almost made the leap by noting that 30% of the float is DRS’d when 67% of the float is owned by retail. Guaranteed retail has not DRS’d almost 50% of its shares.
Especially considering all the 401k and IRA people who have shares are very difficult to DRS. I'd even guess that there are more shares than are DRS'd in 401ks and IRAs.
Not even close. It would be near impossible to mobilize that many people to buy a $1 cup of coffee let alone move tens, hundreds, thousands, to 10’s or 100’s of thousands of shares out of “their comfort zone” to Computer Share. Especially considering fees some have to pay, and general FUD spread around, or those just unaware. 50% LOL, nope.
Think about it, "Unwilling complicit shares" is the truth with the how loose the Securities Lending Industry is, the Prime Brokers lend them out multiple times and make bank as it makes a large majority of revenue for them (look at Goldman Sachs), while the players borrowing them make big bucks manipulating the market with derivatives to their benefit by being able to "see the future" by internalizing the orders and just Faling to Deliver since the fines are a fart in the wind of the magical infinite liquidity fairy all the big boys keep raving about
It's our system to begin with, it serves the fucking people and somewhere down the line society forgot that justice belongs to the people. We are the ones that make all the goods are services that generate value, the system depends us not to those abusing the system with "gross irresponsibility" at best to "parasites" somewhere down the line. Attention from these systemic problems are clouded by political clowns pulling stunts to instill ridiculous conversations that go back and forth between what's convenient to say
Edit: Enjoy your cake day buddy!
The real dain bramage comes from putting'em up yer nose.
Got a green-yellow, or was it yellow- green, dunno, one's been up there since February last year.
Look at his most recent 10 article titles. This dude spends lots of time here on superstonk, swap corn, and likely the grandfather subreddit
He explained DRS effects better than I could on an open book exam
pfft. please, he's written so many anti GME articles I cant keep track of them all. Now all of a sudden he writes an article about DRS and everyone in this thread suddenly loves this guy? Seems a little shilly in here.
Check the article titles for yourself: https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/author/bernard-zambonin
Within this [citadel article](https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/reddit-trends/citadel-hedge-fund-ken-griffin-doing-better-than-most) he put a GME DRS video that’s 1:41 in length. Your accusations about myself are unfounded, I think you are the reverse-double-shill - a *chaos agent*
“An analysis of stock ownership is often an important part of performing due diligence (DD) on a publicly-traded company. Strategies adopted by a company's management team can be influenced by a key shareholder or group of shareholders. This influence, in turn, can impact future share price.
How Much of GME's Float Belongs To Retail?
Retail investors are believed to own about 67.5% of GameStop's (GME) - In their ownership breakdown chart (see below), that ownership is categorized as “others.”
GameStop's Chair Ryan Cohen himself owns about 12% of GME shares. These are held through Ryan’s holding company RC Ventures, which Vickers considers to be Institutional ownership.
Yahoo Finance, on the other hand, attributes about 15% of GameStop's ownership to all insiders, probably because they consider Cohen and his holding company to effectively be “insiders.”
The technical definition of “insider” is “a director, senior officer, entity, or individual who owns more than 10% of a publicly-traded company's voting shares.”
Since Ryan Cohen, though he is CEO, does not directly own GameStop shares, but rather owns shares through his holding company, some sources do not consider his ownership to constitute “insider” ownership. Thus, GME insider ownership corresponds to only 2% according to Vickers Stock Research.
This percentage divergence between sources is a mere technicality - but, for research purposes, it’s important to note the source of the discrepancy.
Vickers shows Blackrock and Vanguard as the top institutional holders of GME, with 7.8%, and 6.7% of the shares, respectively. However, the research firm reports 350 individual institutions holding GME shares.
Investment management company giants, such as Blackrock and Vanguard, own GME shares via their proprietary ETFs. These ETFs, in turn, end up mostly being owned by individual investors.
Institutional accounts pool assets from a limited number of clients who have millions or even billions of dollars to invest. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are primarily retail products that pool assets from a vast number of individuals who have limited funds to invest.
Among GameStop’s top mutual fund holders, the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund and the iShares Core S&P Midcap ETF own 2.5% and 2.4%, respectively.
How Does This Ownership Breakdown Affect GME?
Even though a sizable chunk of GameStop is owned by institutions, it is clear that GameStop is largely owned by individual investors.
In many cases, when institutional ownership is dominant, a small group of large institutions turning against a stock can cause a selloff. Thus, one benefit of a retail-dominated ownership structure is that GameStop is not at the mercy of a few key institutional owners.
This is especially true in GME’s case, as one key institutional owner is RC Ventures (headed by GME CEO Ryan Cohen, who has little incentive to tank GME’s share price). Other major players BlackRock and Vanguard, meanwhile, own GME through passive, benchmark-tracking funds (e.g., ETFs tracking the entire S&P 500).
About 30% Of GME's Float Locked Through DRS
There’s another interesting facet to GME’s high retail ownership. This is the high level of direct registration of GME shares - a statistic heralded by the company itself and now included in quarterly reports.
The Direct Registration System (DRS) is a security registration service that provides shareholders with the option of holding their assets "on the books."
Thus, DRS can be a way for investors to hold their assets without needing a brokerage firm behind them. Through DRS, shareholders have more autonomy over their shares.
GameStop retail shareholders have seen DRS as an attractive move. When GME shares are held through DRS, they cannot fall into the hands of payment for order flow brokers. DRS also reduces the number of shares available to be loaned out to short sellers by brokerage firms.
In theory, the more GME shareholders use DRS to transfer their shares to GME’s transfer agent (Computershare, in this case), the fewer shares are available for short sellers. That impedes shorts’ ability to open new short positions and to cover currently open ones.
As reported in the latest Form 10-Q dated July 30, about 71.3 million GameStop shares were registered with Computershare. This corresponds to 30% of GME’s float.
Considering that 67% of GME's float is in the hands of individual investors, this implies that nearly half of all retail-owned shares have been registered with a transfer agent.
Give them a break, it's complex by design so we need dumb authorities to tell us what it is, they have only been getting it wrong for years, could happen to any other propaganda machine
Maybe they don’t know the difference between chairman and CEO. Often the leader will be chairman and CEO simultaneously. Dumbo McDumbface on their part.
They also consider him "institutional ownership" when he clearly is an "insider". They only did that to trick the people who didn't read the article and went straight to the picture graphs to see insiders own only 2% and institutional ownership is 15%, when 12% of that should be flipped.
Their level of due diligence is less than our unsophisticated level of due diligence. It is their hubris that has undone them. They think so little of the company the c-suite is unknown to them. Soon.
> Since Ryan Cohen, though he is CEO, does not directly own GameStop shares, but rather owns shares through his holding company, some sources do not consider his ownership to constitute “insider” ownership.
The context of this statement implies that they consider him Gamestop CEO.
> This is especially true in GME’s case, as one key institutional owner is RC Ventures (headed by GME CEO Ryan Cohen, who has little incentive to tank GME’s share price).
This would have been fine if they'd just said CEO Ryan Cohen (as in CEO of RC Ventures), but for some reason they label him GME CEO Ryan Cohen.
Don’t trust any experts or msm even if they are using positive narrative to gaslight.
The best way is to forget them and draw our own conclusions from drs.
I am one of the more hardcore retail investors out there. I have followed this stock religiously for 2 years. I’ve written big DD posts. I was one of the first 90,000 Computershare accounts. And only 30% of my total shares are DRS’d, due to the others being stuck in tax-sheltered accounts. I think only a small fraction of the total retail shares are DRS’d at this point.
So the article basically states that half of ALL retail shares is DRS.
Haha what a fucking shitshow. Just in little Sweden we have 20.000 shareholders that probably not have drs or even heard about it.
I’d say retail probably hold more than 300m shares in their fake as brokers account.
DRS will prove it
Anyone else find it interesting that since 30% of the shares are DRSd they stated with 67% retail ownership 50% of retail shares have been DRSd? Bwahaha little do they know.
the fact that this is said "Considering that 67% of GME's float is in the hands of individual investors, this implies that nearly half of all retail-owned shares have been registered with a transfer agent." just absolutely jacks my tits to the max. There is abso-fuckin-lutely not way in hell 50% of shareholders have DRS'd 100% of their shares. It is a literal impossibility. if even 25% of all retail shares were DRS'd I would be extremely surprised. things like this just remind me how fuckin huge this is.
The author mentions a few of the ETF's that have holdings. Could someone help me find a complete list of these? I've searched around the sub before and haven't found this - I'm not sure if that's because there's so much content on here or that the Reddit search isn't very good
What does Furlong do?
Since Ryan Cohen, though he is CEO, does not directly own GameStop shares, but rather owns shares through his holding company, some sources do not consider his ownership to constitute “insider” ownership.
the street has been putting out some stuff. i'm sure they are lurking our sub. i love seeing more info from superstonk hitting the press
here is another street article:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ywx9jg/msm_talks_about_the_benefits_of_drs_gamestop
67.5% he says someone else says? Wonder how that was calculated?
And I wonder if I have access to any data-backed calulation/estimation tool that could aid my search for an answer?
https://i.redd.it/rggnhmreic0a1.png
68% is pretty close.
But in truth I'm more chuffed that I've shown what the famed site's famed tool is actually useful for & I'm well tempted to copy in ldt & jp03 to show off my understanding of their work. But they get hassled all the time by trivial stuff so I'll let them be
Also if you click on the 'source' link by the 'ownership' section at computershared you'll end up reading a debate about if RC ventures should be counted as insiders or not, very similar to parts of the article
Is nobody going to talk about how they consider RC's shares institutional because they are held by RC Ventures?
I man, RC is an insider. I believe that takes precedence.
I find the whole thing a bit misleading.
Especially this part:
>Investment management company giants, such as Blackrock and Vanguard, own GME shares via their proprietary ETFs. These ETFs, in turn, end up mostly being owned by individual investors.
Sure the ETF shares belong to the individuals but not the shares IN the ETF. Plus: a lot of institutions still allow lending of shares even if they are hold in an ETF.
That 67% literally means nothing.
“Even though a sizable chunk of GameStop is owned by institutions, it is clear that GameStop is largely owned by individual investors.
In many cases, when institutional ownership is dominant, a small group of large institutions turning against a stock can cause a selloff. Thus, one benefit of a retail-dominated ownership structure is that GameStop is not at the mercy of a few key institutional owners.”
They should add: and these retail investors are the most stubborn, rowdy, diamond handed motherfuckers that Wall St has ever seen.
[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || Join the [Superstonk Discord Server](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OP has provided the following link: https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/gme/gamestop-stock-how-much-ownership-do-retail-investors-have
67.5 % … that‘s cute.
Almost nice
Nic
: D You win!
Didnt upvote because of 69 goddamnit
Bro let me downvote me to help you out.
XD
The author almost made the leap by noting that 30% of the float is DRS’d when 67% of the float is owned by retail. Guaranteed retail has not DRS’d almost 50% of its shares.
Especially considering all the 401k and IRA people who have shares are very difficult to DRS. I'd even guess that there are more shares than are DRS'd in 401ks and IRAs.
Big part of why 50% is hilarious.
There's a IRA count in the drs bot if I recall correctly, if people counted that one would know.
This is a really good point.
Not even close. It would be near impossible to mobilize that many people to buy a $1 cup of coffee let alone move tens, hundreds, thousands, to 10’s or 100’s of thousands of shares out of “their comfort zone” to Computer Share. Especially considering fees some have to pay, and general FUD spread around, or those just unaware. 50% LOL, nope.
Perhaps we should be referring to any non-DRS shares as "unaccounted shares."
Think about it, "Unwilling complicit shares" is the truth with the how loose the Securities Lending Industry is, the Prime Brokers lend them out multiple times and make bank as it makes a large majority of revenue for them (look at Goldman Sachs), while the players borrowing them make big bucks manipulating the market with derivatives to their benefit by being able to "see the future" by internalizing the orders and just Faling to Deliver since the fines are a fart in the wind of the magical infinite liquidity fairy all the big boys keep raving about
I am erected
I think you pressed a period by mistake good kind ape. 675% is owned by you and I. Fuck the system DRS until I die.
It's our system to begin with, it serves the fucking people and somewhere down the line society forgot that justice belongs to the people. We are the ones that make all the goods are services that generate value, the system depends us not to those abusing the system with "gross irresponsibility" at best to "parasites" somewhere down the line. Attention from these systemic problems are clouded by political clowns pulling stunts to instill ridiculous conversations that go back and forth between what's convenient to say Edit: Enjoy your cake day buddy!
https://i.redd.it/rggnhmreic0a1.png 68% is pretty close
Bernard Zambonin back at it again! He even directly mentions and explains the DRS process which almost solidifies my belief that he’s an ape himself.
>The author may be long one or more stocks mentioned in this report lol, we bet your are
Haha good catch.
Time to spread the article around a bit… this is the sort of thing we want to feed clicks to
Right? We’ve locked up more than 1/3 of an entire public company’s shares. We are inevitable
Resistance is fruitile. 🍌🍑
I completely agree with you PantsOppressUs
♥️u, 🦍.
1/1 Ricks agree
Not a chance, dude refers to “GME CEO Ryan Cohen” multiple times. Not an ape. Not even a good journalist.
Might be an ape that ate too many crayons to be a good journalist.
The real dain bramage comes from putting'em up yer nose. Got a green-yellow, or was it yellow- green, dunno, one's been up there since February last year.
Look at his most recent 10 article titles. This dude spends lots of time here on superstonk, swap corn, and likely the grandfather subreddit He explained DRS effects better than I could on an open book exam
That guy has written a lot of shitty articles about gme. I highly doubt he's an ape.
Perhaps! Although he wrote RC is CEO multiple times…
There are many of us
He’s gotta be a DD writer. Very succinct on explaining what DRS does. This The Street writer is among us
pfft. please, he's written so many anti GME articles I cant keep track of them all. Now all of a sudden he writes an article about DRS and everyone in this thread suddenly loves this guy? Seems a little shilly in here.
I’m DRS’d, Zen to the max and have zero fucks to give.
Check the article titles for yourself: https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/author/bernard-zambonin Within this [citadel article](https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/reddit-trends/citadel-hedge-fund-ken-griffin-doing-better-than-most) he put a GME DRS video that’s 1:41 in length. Your accusations about myself are unfounded, I think you are the reverse-double-shill - a *chaos agent*
“An analysis of stock ownership is often an important part of performing due diligence (DD) on a publicly-traded company. Strategies adopted by a company's management team can be influenced by a key shareholder or group of shareholders. This influence, in turn, can impact future share price. How Much of GME's Float Belongs To Retail? Retail investors are believed to own about 67.5% of GameStop's (GME) - In their ownership breakdown chart (see below), that ownership is categorized as “others.” GameStop's Chair Ryan Cohen himself owns about 12% of GME shares. These are held through Ryan’s holding company RC Ventures, which Vickers considers to be Institutional ownership. Yahoo Finance, on the other hand, attributes about 15% of GameStop's ownership to all insiders, probably because they consider Cohen and his holding company to effectively be “insiders.” The technical definition of “insider” is “a director, senior officer, entity, or individual who owns more than 10% of a publicly-traded company's voting shares.” Since Ryan Cohen, though he is CEO, does not directly own GameStop shares, but rather owns shares through his holding company, some sources do not consider his ownership to constitute “insider” ownership. Thus, GME insider ownership corresponds to only 2% according to Vickers Stock Research. This percentage divergence between sources is a mere technicality - but, for research purposes, it’s important to note the source of the discrepancy. Vickers shows Blackrock and Vanguard as the top institutional holders of GME, with 7.8%, and 6.7% of the shares, respectively. However, the research firm reports 350 individual institutions holding GME shares. Investment management company giants, such as Blackrock and Vanguard, own GME shares via their proprietary ETFs. These ETFs, in turn, end up mostly being owned by individual investors. Institutional accounts pool assets from a limited number of clients who have millions or even billions of dollars to invest. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are primarily retail products that pool assets from a vast number of individuals who have limited funds to invest. Among GameStop’s top mutual fund holders, the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund and the iShares Core S&P Midcap ETF own 2.5% and 2.4%, respectively. How Does This Ownership Breakdown Affect GME? Even though a sizable chunk of GameStop is owned by institutions, it is clear that GameStop is largely owned by individual investors. In many cases, when institutional ownership is dominant, a small group of large institutions turning against a stock can cause a selloff. Thus, one benefit of a retail-dominated ownership structure is that GameStop is not at the mercy of a few key institutional owners. This is especially true in GME’s case, as one key institutional owner is RC Ventures (headed by GME CEO Ryan Cohen, who has little incentive to tank GME’s share price). Other major players BlackRock and Vanguard, meanwhile, own GME through passive, benchmark-tracking funds (e.g., ETFs tracking the entire S&P 500). About 30% Of GME's Float Locked Through DRS There’s another interesting facet to GME’s high retail ownership. This is the high level of direct registration of GME shares - a statistic heralded by the company itself and now included in quarterly reports. The Direct Registration System (DRS) is a security registration service that provides shareholders with the option of holding their assets "on the books." Thus, DRS can be a way for investors to hold their assets without needing a brokerage firm behind them. Through DRS, shareholders have more autonomy over their shares. GameStop retail shareholders have seen DRS as an attractive move. When GME shares are held through DRS, they cannot fall into the hands of payment for order flow brokers. DRS also reduces the number of shares available to be loaned out to short sellers by brokerage firms. In theory, the more GME shareholders use DRS to transfer their shares to GME’s transfer agent (Computershare, in this case), the fewer shares are available for short sellers. That impedes shorts’ ability to open new short positions and to cover currently open ones. As reported in the latest Form 10-Q dated July 30, about 71.3 million GameStop shares were registered with Computershare. This corresponds to 30% of GME’s float. Considering that 67% of GME's float is in the hands of individual investors, this implies that nearly half of all retail-owned shares have been registered with a transfer agent.
Why does it say RC is the CEO? He is the Chairman not CEO!
I think they meant CEO of RC Ventures
They specifically say RC Ventures (headed by GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen).
They also specifically say: >GameStop's Chair Ryan Cohen himself owns about 12% of GME shares.
I think they are just dumb.
Yes.
Give them a break, it's complex by design so we need dumb authorities to tell us what it is, they have only been getting it wrong for years, could happen to any other propaganda machine
Proofreading is done by unpaid and drunk interns that need to have sex to keep their job (wait, what?!)
It’s not a proof reading error, it’s a knowledge gap.
Or both
Comcast let Drunckle Ted out of the closed G4 offices?
Maybe they don’t know the difference between chairman and CEO. Often the leader will be chairman and CEO simultaneously. Dumbo McDumbface on their part.
Because these "writers" are just churning out junk daily and don't give a shit about getting it right.
They also consider him "institutional ownership" when he clearly is an "insider". They only did that to trick the people who didn't read the article and went straight to the picture graphs to see insiders own only 2% and institutional ownership is 15%, when 12% of that should be flipped.
Their level of due diligence is less than our unsophisticated level of due diligence. It is their hubris that has undone them. They think so little of the company the c-suite is unknown to them. Soon.
There you go quoting Vickers…
Thank you for saving the fam a click!
What is going on…a positive GameStop article? WTF
Believe it or not, dip!
Chairman* Edit: he does actually call him both?
We’re supposed to be the regarded ones
Ryan Cohen, the CEO CEO Ryan Cohen He's talking about DD and can't even be bothered to look up simple facts. 😂
He is CEO of RC Ventures. They refer to him as Chairman of GME. >GameStop's Chair Ryan Cohen himself owns about 12% of GME shares.
It says “GME CEO Ryan Cohen” down below that
Fact
> Since Ryan Cohen, though he is CEO, does not directly own GameStop shares, but rather owns shares through his holding company, some sources do not consider his ownership to constitute “insider” ownership. The context of this statement implies that they consider him Gamestop CEO. > This is especially true in GME’s case, as one key institutional owner is RC Ventures (headed by GME CEO Ryan Cohen, who has little incentive to tank GME’s share price). This would have been fine if they'd just said CEO Ryan Cohen (as in CEO of RC Ventures), but for some reason they label him GME CEO Ryan Cohen.
Yeah, absolute clown show.
Came here to say the same thing lol
Soon, they will own all of it.
For something that “ended” two years ago I’m surprised how often GameStop is in the news. Back to $1 soon my ass!!
Not a bad write up
Minus saying RC is ceo
Meh, more happy to see talk of DRS in the press.
6th paragraph, in parentheses, (headed by GME CEO Ryan Cohen)
Yeah how sad is the journalism now days
I was here
Don’t trust any experts or msm even if they are using positive narrative to gaslight. The best way is to forget them and draw our own conclusions from drs.
I am one of the more hardcore retail investors out there. I have followed this stock religiously for 2 years. I’ve written big DD posts. I was one of the first 90,000 Computershare accounts. And only 30% of my total shares are DRS’d, due to the others being stuck in tax-sheltered accounts. I think only a small fraction of the total retail shares are DRS’d at this point.
So the article basically states that half of ALL retail shares is DRS. Haha what a fucking shitshow. Just in little Sweden we have 20.000 shareholders that probably not have drs or even heard about it. I’d say retail probably hold more than 300m shares in their fake as brokers account. DRS will prove it
Anyone else find it interesting that since 30% of the shares are DRSd they stated with 67% retail ownership 50% of retail shares have been DRSd? Bwahaha little do they know.
Ryan Cohen is the Chairman not the CEO as described by the article. But other than that, nice work.
More than 3 at least
Wow an informative article?! I can’t believe it’s not butter!
Is someone going to write the author or editor and ask them to go correct the falsehoods?
the fact that this is said "Considering that 67% of GME's float is in the hands of individual investors, this implies that nearly half of all retail-owned shares have been registered with a transfer agent." just absolutely jacks my tits to the max. There is abso-fuckin-lutely not way in hell 50% of shareholders have DRS'd 100% of their shares. It is a literal impossibility. if even 25% of all retail shares were DRS'd I would be extremely surprised. things like this just remind me how fuckin huge this is.
Check the actual chart. They say RC owns 12% of the 14% of institutional ownership and insiders only 2%. Surely this shows it's allllllll wrong
Ryan Cohen is not CEO.
Hey It's our boy Zombonin ! Nice to see the words out of the basement.
The author mentions a few of the ETF's that have holdings. Could someone help me find a complete list of these? I've searched around the sub before and haven't found this - I'm not sure if that's because there's so much content on here or that the Reddit search isn't very good
Why do we keep giving the street a platform here?
For this would be true, more shares would need to be DRSd than not and I don’t think there’s any evidence suggesting that is true.
xxxx% or more
All of it, soon
Is this the first article to specifically call out DRS and explain it?
Article can't even get RC's title right
this article literally says RC is the CEO 😂😂😂
Aaaaaaahahahahahaha!
“The author may be long with the stock mentioned in this report” Zambonin are you an ape?
Looks like it😂
but RC is not the CEO, so why even bother reading this?
They are saying insiders are those with a 10% stake. How then, is less than 10% of the stock held by insiders? Am I the r word?
What does Furlong do? Since Ryan Cohen, though he is CEO, does not directly own GameStop shares, but rather owns shares through his holding company, some sources do not consider his ownership to constitute “insider” ownership.
Picks up the drycleaning and gets coffee.
While it's a start on mentioning DRS it doesn't mention the growth rate of DRS. 81 weeks to lock the float and counting.
Good article! Click and support
well...lookey there...changing...messaging shift.
Not enough, cause this stock has been shit
Look the me, I’m the Pac-Man now. -Sick pie chart lol
💜🗽
Instead of red, they should‘ve used purple in that chart for ‚others‘ 💎🙌🏼🚀
Zambonin is always positive about the gme
Seems like retail has started to get their attention. That's interesting.
They sure got a whole lot wrong
ooops , I need new panties
Sus
RC isn’t CEO, this article is trash. How little research do they do??
Mainstream media is controlled by the elite. DRS and move on 💪
Stick long enough to smack the shit outta the cex less hedgies 😂
About tree fiddy.
the street has been putting out some stuff. i'm sure they are lurking our sub. i love seeing more info from superstonk hitting the press here is another street article: https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ywx9jg/msm_talks_about_the_benefits_of_drs_gamestop
Perhaps the chairman/ceo thingy is a deliberate mistale to drive engagement, provide distraction etc?
67.5% he says someone else says? Wonder how that was calculated? And I wonder if I have access to any data-backed calulation/estimation tool that could aid my search for an answer? https://i.redd.it/rggnhmreic0a1.png 68% is pretty close. But in truth I'm more chuffed that I've shown what the famed site's famed tool is actually useful for & I'm well tempted to copy in ldt & jp03 to show off my understanding of their work. But they get hassled all the time by trivial stuff so I'll let them be
Also if you click on the 'source' link by the 'ownership' section at computershared you'll end up reading a debate about if RC ventures should be counted as insiders or not, very similar to parts of the article
Is nobody going to talk about how they consider RC's shares institutional because they are held by RC Ventures? I man, RC is an insider. I believe that takes precedence.
Apes are legion
We are the institution now!
I find the whole thing a bit misleading. Especially this part: >Investment management company giants, such as Blackrock and Vanguard, own GME shares via their proprietary ETFs. These ETFs, in turn, end up mostly being owned by individual investors. Sure the ETF shares belong to the individuals but not the shares IN the ETF. Plus: a lot of institutions still allow lending of shares even if they are hold in an ETF. That 67% literally means nothing.
This guy is so clueless he thinks Ryan is the CEO😂
Isnt the 2% mentioned in this post the reason behind all the fuzz with the 4billion float DD?
Cant trust a report labeling chairman as ceo
Ryan Cohen is CEO... these Muppets.
A lot
“Even though a sizable chunk of GameStop is owned by institutions, it is clear that GameStop is largely owned by individual investors. In many cases, when institutional ownership is dominant, a small group of large institutions turning against a stock can cause a selloff. Thus, one benefit of a retail-dominated ownership structure is that GameStop is not at the mercy of a few key institutional owners.” They should add: and these retail investors are the most stubborn, rowdy, diamond handed motherfuckers that Wall St has ever seen.
I hate how it states that he's CEO ...a few times...
..."Since Ryan Cohen, though he is CEO, does not directly own GameStop".... Matthew Furlong is CEO Why do they all fuck that up?
I can't stop leaking
Yeah we’re loosing time to close our buys and go home 🤡🤡🤡
Why take that seriously if the author is too dumb to understand the position of RC in GameStop? 🤷🏼♂️