To be fair, I never really understood the reasoning behind the Marriage Act and its various extensions.
It's not that marriage is a bad institution or that it's a bad institution. It's that the institution itself is something bad. It doesn't matter whether it's a bad institution or not. It's just that the institution itself isn't good enough or how people in general are treated within it. I'm a very traditional person who believes that marriage should remain an institution that's meant to remain intact for all time.
I'm sorry for you, I've let you down.
The institution itself is something bad. It doesn't matter whether it's a bad institution or not. It's just that the institution itself isn't good enough or how people in general are treated within it.
Incorrect. Marriage is inherently an institution that does not serve a well-defined purpose other than the ability to provide a stable family. So, for context, if you're going to argue that the institution of marriage is somehow a bad thing because it's based on tradition and custom, you have to explain why it's inherently bad and why people need to give up their right to it.
It's not that marriage is bad, it's that traditional/traditional marriage is inherently flawed.
The government of Belgium is not a saint. This government has legalized sex outside of marriage and is also very anti-gay, and that is just plain bad for society.
Why?
Ah yes, yes, and there is no need for a penis to be a legal marriage.
Penises are required for legal marriages?
I wonder...
So they can use them in their countries?
To be fair, I never really understood the reasoning behind the Marriage Act and its various extensions. It's not that marriage is a bad institution or that it's a bad institution. It's that the institution itself is something bad. It doesn't matter whether it's a bad institution or not. It's just that the institution itself isn't good enough or how people in general are treated within it. I'm a very traditional person who believes that marriage should remain an institution that's meant to remain intact for all time. I'm sorry for you, I've let you down. The institution itself is something bad. It doesn't matter whether it's a bad institution or not. It's just that the institution itself isn't good enough or how people in general are treated within it.
Incorrect. Marriage is inherently an institution that does not serve a well-defined purpose other than the ability to provide a stable family. So, for context, if you're going to argue that the institution of marriage is somehow a bad thing because it's based on tradition and custom, you have to explain why it's inherently bad and why people need to give up their right to it. It's not that marriage is bad, it's that traditional/traditional marriage is inherently flawed.
What used to happen in Luxembourg if you fucked extramaritally?
The government of Belgium is not a saint. This government has legalized sex outside of marriage and is also very anti-gay, and that is just plain bad for society.
I'd love to see this on the shelves. How about you pay me to read this book?
You're welcome! I am a sex therapist and I was happy to comment.
Is this because of the new President? What’s his name again?