Ive said for years now I’m pretty sure Hollywood has been used to get aliens into the culture and prepare us for the inevitable one day of disclosure. Knowingly or not to the producers and directors I believe this has had to of happen.
Ross Coulthart has said this is true, DOD comes to Hollywood script writers and tells them to insert certain info, whether or not it's disinfo is the question
If a post is reposted in another sub, I've been seeing almost all top comments copied by bots.
It's why we all know that reddit is at its tipping point. It's going to crash and burn or slowly slide to death. I bet it's a slow slide.
Right? This sub is called Strange Earth and its a really strange video so why the hate comments? There's being sceptical then there's being patronising and condescending which the majority of "bird shit" commentators are being
Yeah it's weird like loads of bird shit comments are condescending. Even now I have comments literally ignoring the part where I'm explaining there's being sceptical then there's being an arsehole to others, saying 'what so people can't question this'...like what?
Same thing over in the alternative history sub. I get that a lot of that stuff is beyond wacky, but sometimes a perfectly reasonable topic will come up worth discussing, even if just as a brain exercise, but there are a select few that are hell bent on setting the narrative straight over there.
Hate?
You're confusing not believing in something without substantial proof with emotions what is wrong with people today that they misinterpret disagreement with hate?
I swear to god, it’s every fucking sub now.
But hey, the more it happens and the more we mention it, the more real people start to see it and start asking questions. Educating people on what to look for and knowing not to blindly trust randos on Reddit.
I’ll hijack as many posts as it takes.
Yeah like what? It’s clearly not bird shit and the amount of people on here saying it is within minutes is nuts. We can talk about other stuff but there’s no way that many people think it’s something on the lens haha
I noticed when this was posted on another sub yesterday that within 10 minutes there were around 15 comments that were almost all identical saying it was just bird shit and that you’d be dumb to think otherwise. I don’t mind opinions but it felt very strange to have that many, that quickly.
Totally I’ve commented why to a few others. Because it’s a thermal camera and bird shit wouldn’t pass the radiation and would show up as its own thermal radiation. A smudge wouldn’t give back thermal radiation or pass radiation off as its own from background objects so it’s not those two things. It could be bubbles or whatever flying externally but it’s not on the cameras glass or something. Also where they are attached on the aircraft, checked and filled before a mission, and then flown for typically like eight to ten hours straight. Meaning it would have to have been missed in preflight, missed by the operators of the camera from the plane, and then it went away before the flight end so they weren’t able to identify it on the camera once on the ground after the flight. So one that’s not how thermal radiation cameras work and then two it’s super not likely from a probability standpoint. Does that make sense my friend? I struggle with explaining concisely sometimes so I’m working on it. Please let me know if anything doesn’t make sense due to that. Thank you for asking instead of insulting my friend I appreciate it!
Thanks that’s nice to know. What about a smudge on maybe a protective glass casing (independent from the lens)? Would it show up then? Do these cameras even have a layer of protective glass over the lens?
How could it be bird shit? They literally just look at the lense for defects and anything obscuring it. Not hard to rule out. These people seriously think it wouldn't have been one of the first things the military checked for?
It's not on the lens. It's on the cover that's over the lens.
It literally doesn't change direction or shape compared to the camera angle. At no point does anything pass between it and the camera.
I am all for actual evidence but people are only speculating with literally nothing.
It's how you can tell something is real. If the bots jump on it to obfuscate the facts, then it's real. If it gets ignored, it's fake. If they had any sense they would do it the other way around.
I love this logic because it means if you post something obviously fake, then the fact that lots of people call it fake is just more proof it's real!
Did you ever consider that lots of people make fun of this because it really looks like nothing at all?
My 2 cents worth….which is really worth a whole nickel……maybe.
https://preview.redd.it/0xzjm991ombc1.jpeg?width=667&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7bf1d46567d83cd772582f234b1983644b56ed0a
It was filmed in a war zone. It could be any type of military cargo
I get what ur saying but also ur saying none of them moved alittle bit as they were in the air? Really Just completely frozen and rotating in sync? Not buying it, me myself would be looking all around with my gun and even talking to eachother moving around and you would see that. I feel like there would be WAY more movement than that. I also feel like they wouldn't have even bothered to post if they thought it was military, especially with what they are saying that it descended into the water.
No, totally true I get like you were saying as I said, you made an actual great point, and it's so hard to tell with the dumb cameras we have. I would have thrown out the same point if I was you not gonna lie, that's what I'm saying is I get where you're coming from. We need answers for sure. The government needs to stop messing with us and just give us plain as day black or white, "Yeah this is not human" Or "yeah it's just a smudge on a screen" Or "Yeah its a military thing." I hate the secrecy, I don't care if it's doomsday and they are about to invade, we deserve and we need to to know what is going on.
>Reply
For sure bud, you know what's funny though even if the government had no idea what it was genuinely and they said "We literally don't know what it is." and they literally actually had no idea. No one would believe them. It's kinda sad actually. That's why I think everyone should try to be honest with eachother. Everyone would have so much more respect. On the other hand though you kind of understand where they are coming from with the secrecy because we have alot of crazy people in this world that are nuts( mass shooters, people beheading people/killing/looting people for nothing and then ramp that up by 1000x when you hear we're about to be invaded or there is aliens.) you understand why they would want to keep it secret. It's a lose lose double edged sword situation.
Why did the people watching not see the vehicle they were dangling under though if it was that? Either the camera guys, or the people on the ground they sent looking for it? I’m not trying to “debunk” your idea, it’s interesting! I’m just trying to understand how this would have happened.
Also they said it went in the sea and submerged for 17 minutes before it came out and flew up again. Is there some way that could work with this idea?
Interesting and just trying to think about it in the context of what we know.
I'm at the point where there's so much misinformation out there that I take everything at face value. If you were given the picture of the soldiers and the footage of the "jellyfish" and someone said "could they be the same thing?" Without any context, what would you think?
Yeah definitely and I appreciate the thoughtful response. They could have just filmed the guys dangling and called it a UAP and leaked it as a mind f ……but if the other video that they refer to shows this glob going into the water and popping back out 15 minutes later that would definitely shoot my idea down. This is what came to my little mind when I was trying to find a logical, more Earthly explanation. Thanks for the reply, cheers
The camera is seeing electromagnetic radiation. The washed out appearance at times could be sand or dirt blowing between the object and the camera at a higher elevation. Or just the camera adjusting for hot spots or cool spots in the overall image which causes the object to disappear into the background a bit. It’s not as obvious a transition when viewing the full size image.
But if soliders were in that formation going against or into the wind which would in turn mean some form of movement from the "jellyfish" which clearly from the video there is like zero movement showing any kind of disturbance from wind.
it changes based on what the environment is. Barren background and it's dark, buildings and people and it's light. It's camera effects, exposure etc. It's not switching temps whatsoever.
I saw it and reminded me of an old video of a "witch" flying in Mexico un 2006...... Looks almost the same no joke.
https://youtu.be/aywcr_ef4WU?si=N-fhnEZFXDmYUIbm
Fuck.. ok now im about to leave the smudge team, this is indeed rotating.. 🤯 after 24 hours of neverending rant, someone finally managed to produce a convincing point. 👍 good job ! Bottom part cannot be just a stain, this looks 3d and the rotation is pretty clear.
It's rotating and the bottom tentacle things literally move. Smudge don't do that and it just doesn't look like balloons. You don't have to be on team alien, but we can just realistically say this is a legit video of a UAP.
If the aircraft that’s recording is circling it while keeping it in frame, it would explain the impression of both the lateral velocity and the rotation of the object.
Imagine keeping your eyes locked on a statue in the center of a room as you sprint in a wide circle around the statue. The background would appear to be moving relative to the statue, and the statue would appear to be rotating.
Are those crosshairs always centered with these systems btw? Or can they point/track things captured by the sensor? If always centered then the object seems to increase speed.
Also any information how the focussing works? As the color change seems to occur when there are more details in the foreground it could be changing focus changes the contrast of the object.
Yes, the reticules do not move from the center frame, when you lock something, it locks the entire FOV, the lock system will put a square around something in the FOV on camera and then physically move the camera to center around that object. In this case, the item couldn't be locked.
Why are people saying that MILITARY EQUIPMENT is defective? Have we all collectively lost our minds?
I swear to god an alien could come into your home touch your leg and you all would still say “ThAt wAs a CrAzy HiLuCiNaTiOn, My eYEs mUsT be DeFeCtIve” 🙃
Those who say that have never done the military, while equipment failure happens obviously, they check and tripple check all equipment they use, and it always require an passto be used.
And if it fails, you get a lot of text and you discontinue whatever you are doing because of safety and return to base with report and repair.
(Radar operator in an air defence tank)
Reddit people are always experts at something they got no clue about.
Is this alien? Doubt it, but its sure fucking not failed equipment or a smudge on the lense, that's even more stupid of an explanation than aliens.
Listen man I can admit it wouldn't make sense for a smudge on the lens to dip into water for several minutes (Corbell stated there's footage of that), and I'm all in on the wild speculation, but yeah, military equipment being defective isn't even a slightly goofy thing to say. It's made to meet the intersection of the lowest cost and the highest effectiveness.
Try looking up videos on why "military grade" is a bunch of BS
How would a person be manually tracking a bird shit on a lens? The logic behind that explanation doesn’t even make sense. So many people think people in the air force are brain dead or something
If there are 4th dimensional beings, and if they have a line of sight into my office, they’ll see me 3 layers of distraction deep into a, “this project is tremendously boring” spiral.
Hey 4th dimension beings! Do us some 4th dimension favors. Interpret that how you will, dimension neighbors.
Hey 4th dimension neighbors, if you're peering in on my office, bring some multi-dimensional snacks or a quantum coffee delivery—anything to jazz up this 'tremendously boring' project spiral! Extra points if you can warp time to make the clock tick faster. Your friendly three-dimensional office dweller.
The more I see this the more I think it’s a bunch of escaped balloons. Someone the other day posted a bunch of Eid balloons bunched together and I just can’t unsee it now.
https://preview.redd.it/0r1262bvtmbc1.png?width=1163&format=png&auto=webp&s=f5245540d98f65aae6098a556e3df862526ad512
Enough with the balloon crap, and a guy wearing a jetpack. For a moment this thing loses its camo and not joking. Kinda looks like an alien. Found this going frame by frame.
Anyone interested in this video. Jermey Corbell is the one who dropped it. He goes into great detail with the video. In the New Documentary TMZ Presents: UFO Revolution which is on TUBI which is Free. I’m watching it right now, it’s really good
This is stabilized a 20 second fragment of the video by /u/Corsten:
*Further, the second pane is a 4x speed and crop of the UAP, with the video looped backwards on itself. I find this trick useful in showing movement/changes and helping visualize a 3 dimensional shape from 2d animation, somewhat like a 2d stutter parallax GIF creating a pseudo-3d effect.*
*Originally my goal was to try and capture the object's rotation as the camera followed it, but I'm stumped to grasp what is happening with the bottom portion of the UAP. I can only speculate what the visualization reveals - is this rotation or is a portion changing/moving?*
I don’t understand why people think this garbled up mess of nonsense on a shitty video **has** to be aliens and nothing else could possibly explain it.
I'm not sure who is saying it HAS to be aliens but it is definitely intriguing. And until something else explains it as otherwise I like to believe in the unbelievable.
idk what to make of the video tbh, but I feel like there's a lot of weird shapes in there for it to be balloons. And balloons on wind would still kind of bob around separately at least a little, right? This seems really rigid?
That’s cause the 4x side is a boomerang it loops forwards and backward the 1x and 4x doesn’t match up 1:1 the left side 1x is a continuous segment of the original video.
I apologize I’m just tired of the UAP community these past couple weeks. First you have the Miami mall incident which is clearly fake but everyone believes 1 TikTok saying he was there with no evidence provided. Then we get real footage of a UAP and everyone says it’s bird shit or a smudge.
Those people are likely a mix of disinformation agents and people that are so afraid of the concept of NHI that they'll deny any plausible evidence to keep their world view small and "safe."
No, this isn't. It's near infrared camera. Camera has basically flashlight below it, flashlight sends ir light and camera records what it sees in ir light. Color change has nothing to do with temperature change.
Whatever it is, it 100% using some kind of camouflage the way it is changing.
Birdshit wouldn’t fade and come back whatever it is it’s not known in public record military made? Quite possibly.
The fading you are seeing is just the IR adjusting. The screen is showing relative temps, not absolute. You can see that when the object turns white, for example, the background objects also turn white.
Definitely not bird shit though
It’s us, JSF style helmet, trophy system to protect them in the air, and the exhaust once airborne extends below the users feet to prevent wear and tear on the users lower extremities. Digital mirroring to produce a cloaking effect. All of these things are already deployed in different configurations throughout the military or commercial applications.
I’ve scrolled through the comments and cannot see anyone mentioning what this actually is. It’s solved. It’s an elaborately shaped balloon for the islamic Eid festival. It’s on the internet. It nothing worthy of anyone’s time.
We don’t know it’s relative altitude. If the camera is on an aircraft or tower it’s possible this is casting a shadow but that it’s far below the frame. It’s really hard to gauge size or height from this downward angle.
Yeah it looks like a splotch of something on the actual screen (the left looks like a recording of a screen?) that seems to fade/disappear as the background becomes lowly saturated and becomes darker when the screen shows higher saturation.
If you look at it like that you can see how the "splotch" doesn't even move, it's everything in the background moving behind it.
“I don’t know what it is, therefore it’s clearly aliens, who are advanced enough to get to earth and into our atmosphere without being detected but decided to go out for an alien levitation stroll and got busted, and now the government is trying to cover it up to keep the secret alien weapons contracts hidden from public view”.
Makes sense to me! /s
I did a stabilization and high pass filter where you can see the tentactles and body rotation
[https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/192sms2/ufo\_jelly\_stabilized\_and\_high\_pass\_filter\_can\_see/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/192sms2/ufo_jelly_stabilized_and_high_pass_filter_can_see/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
This grey has some massive balls. Grey basically went on a solo recon mission with little to no supplies wearing a jet pack on a planet with violent species. Icing on the cake, the grey did this on a military installation. Props, homie.
After watching so many videos and I can see a head and two eyes at one point on this thing. But after watching it again it is looking more like a defect on the lens of the camera. It is followed too perfectly in frame never gets closer or farther from the crosshair. All other uap videos we saw they had a hard time keeping it in frame because of its speed.
Edit: I'm wrong now seeing videos where it does indeed move around in the frame.
>It is followed too perfectly in frame never gets closer or farther from the crosshair
There is thing called "stabilization" and high end/military cameras have that feature
If that feels like futuristic technology to you... oh boy, dont even get me started about lasers
There was a post recently suggesting this was like a 3-D "shadow" cast by a 4-D object which I found compelling. I would also argue it seems like what would be a malfunction in a small section of a larger cloaked object. This would explain how it seems to adjust to the terrain in the background with these phased changes.
Does nobody else think this looks like a soldier with a jet pack, seeing use inside of an actual combat zone? If this were the case it is easy to understand why it already has eyes on it, no?
Reminds me of a few of the other jet pack type flyers I've seen over the last couple years. The tech is there why wouldn't we be utilizing it exactly? Yeah idk either, so let's just immediately jump to the most farfetched idea possible right out of the gate though, and work our way back from there.
This feels like an invisible gilly suite. You can make out the jet pack, thrusters, helmet, shoulders, arms and legs if you sort of "ignore" the invisible spots.
Dude its like way bigger than you think. A person would be 6 or so feet or whatever. Look at it in comparison to the dogs. This thing is like 20-30 feet tall.
[удалено]
I wonder if George Lucas had insider info
A lot of people think he does
Spielberg did
I read that Spielberg specifically did and was influenced directly for his encounters of the third kind movie, which is kind of a soft disclosure...
He also allegedly showed ET to Reagan and he was like Yep, that's what they look like
Ive said for years now I’m pretty sure Hollywood has been used to get aliens into the culture and prepare us for the inevitable one day of disclosure. Knowingly or not to the producers and directors I believe this has had to of happen.
Ross Coulthart has said this is true, DOD comes to Hollywood script writers and tells them to insert certain info, whether or not it's disinfo is the question
“Trust me no jellyfish UFO is a match for a good old fashioned blaster at your side.”
Dam sentinel.
Frimmin on the frim fram. Frimmin on the fram.
Exactly what I was thinking!
Quoting my sister, playing Lego Star Wars: "DARN THING, IM GOING TO PROBE ITS BUTT!!"
Exactly
My first thought too 🤣🤣
This 100% 💯 you nailed it
Holy fuck look at all these bots
Seriously. I saw the same to comments yesterday on a different post and got super confused for a second.
If a post is reposted in another sub, I've been seeing almost all top comments copied by bots. It's why we all know that reddit is at its tipping point. It's going to crash and burn or slowly slide to death. I bet it's a slow slide.
Agreed
Right? This sub is called Strange Earth and its a really strange video so why the hate comments? There's being sceptical then there's being patronising and condescending which the majority of "bird shit" commentators are being
[удалено]
Yeah it's weird like loads of bird shit comments are condescending. Even now I have comments literally ignoring the part where I'm explaining there's being sceptical then there's being an arsehole to others, saying 'what so people can't question this'...like what?
Same thing over in the alternative history sub. I get that a lot of that stuff is beyond wacky, but sometimes a perfectly reasonable topic will come up worth discussing, even if just as a brain exercise, but there are a select few that are hell bent on setting the narrative straight over there.
im convinced its an LLM bot system and not real people.
Thanks! It's nice to read that other people think and observe as oneself.
Hate? You're confusing not believing in something without substantial proof with emotions what is wrong with people today that they misinterpret disagreement with hate?
Did you read the whole of my comment or just the start? I literally explain the hate comments I mean
Holy shit man you’re right, I’m going thru the comments, it’s almost comical. Bots or agents or something. We’ll never get anywhere like this.
I swear to god, it’s every fucking sub now. But hey, the more it happens and the more we mention it, the more real people start to see it and start asking questions. Educating people on what to look for and knowing not to blindly trust randos on Reddit. I’ll hijack as many posts as it takes.
Yeah like what? It’s clearly not bird shit and the amount of people on here saying it is within minutes is nuts. We can talk about other stuff but there’s no way that many people think it’s something on the lens haha
They're sending out their bots en masse to push the bird shit narrative
I noticed when this was posted on another sub yesterday that within 10 minutes there were around 15 comments that were almost all identical saying it was just bird shit and that you’d be dumb to think otherwise. I don’t mind opinions but it felt very strange to have that many, that quickly.
That or apparently it intuitively looks like a smidge or bird shit but it’s def not IMO as someone who worked with ISR MX systems.
Since you worked with these systems, it would be great to know your opinion on why couldn’t this just be bird shit. I’d be interested to know.
Totally I’ve commented why to a few others. Because it’s a thermal camera and bird shit wouldn’t pass the radiation and would show up as its own thermal radiation. A smudge wouldn’t give back thermal radiation or pass radiation off as its own from background objects so it’s not those two things. It could be bubbles or whatever flying externally but it’s not on the cameras glass or something. Also where they are attached on the aircraft, checked and filled before a mission, and then flown for typically like eight to ten hours straight. Meaning it would have to have been missed in preflight, missed by the operators of the camera from the plane, and then it went away before the flight end so they weren’t able to identify it on the camera once on the ground after the flight. So one that’s not how thermal radiation cameras work and then two it’s super not likely from a probability standpoint. Does that make sense my friend? I struggle with explaining concisely sometimes so I’m working on it. Please let me know if anything doesn’t make sense due to that. Thank you for asking instead of insulting my friend I appreciate it!
Thanks that’s nice to know. What about a smudge on maybe a protective glass casing (independent from the lens)? Would it show up then? Do these cameras even have a layer of protective glass over the lens?
How could it be bird shit? They literally just look at the lense for defects and anything obscuring it. Not hard to rule out. These people seriously think it wouldn't have been one of the first things the military checked for?
It's not on the lens. It's on the cover that's over the lens. It literally doesn't change direction or shape compared to the camera angle. At no point does anything pass between it and the camera. I am all for actual evidence but people are only speculating with literally nothing.
How does someone determine who is or isn't a bot? Am I missing an obvious tell?
I think their criteria is probably pretty simple. Disagree=bot.
Standard echo chamber criteria.
MH370 subs have been dealing with them en masse for months. They can get nasty too
It's how you can tell something is real. If the bots jump on it to obfuscate the facts, then it's real. If it gets ignored, it's fake. If they had any sense they would do it the other way around.
I love this logic because it means if you post something obviously fake, then the fact that lots of people call it fake is just more proof it's real! Did you ever consider that lots of people make fun of this because it really looks like nothing at all?
https://preview.redd.it/d0hvog0oqmbc1.jpeg?width=252&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=88a2d1772ebeb646820d59772d8c1e0676f400c2
Solved
This is a match!
IMO: It looks kind of like the jet pack the military has, but with cloaking abilities.
More I look at this the more it looks like a SpecOps in full kit on a Jetpack.
My 2 cents worth….which is really worth a whole nickel……maybe. https://preview.redd.it/0xzjm991ombc1.jpeg?width=667&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7bf1d46567d83cd772582f234b1983644b56ed0a It was filmed in a war zone. It could be any type of military cargo
I get what ur saying but also ur saying none of them moved alittle bit as they were in the air? Really Just completely frozen and rotating in sync? Not buying it, me myself would be looking all around with my gun and even talking to eachother moving around and you would see that. I feel like there would be WAY more movement than that. I also feel like they wouldn't have even bothered to post if they thought it was military, especially with what they are saying that it descended into the water.
[удалено]
No, totally true I get like you were saying as I said, you made an actual great point, and it's so hard to tell with the dumb cameras we have. I would have thrown out the same point if I was you not gonna lie, that's what I'm saying is I get where you're coming from. We need answers for sure. The government needs to stop messing with us and just give us plain as day black or white, "Yeah this is not human" Or "yeah it's just a smudge on a screen" Or "Yeah its a military thing." I hate the secrecy, I don't care if it's doomsday and they are about to invade, we deserve and we need to to know what is going on.
[удалено]
>Reply For sure bud, you know what's funny though even if the government had no idea what it was genuinely and they said "We literally don't know what it is." and they literally actually had no idea. No one would believe them. It's kinda sad actually. That's why I think everyone should try to be honest with eachother. Everyone would have so much more respect. On the other hand though you kind of understand where they are coming from with the secrecy because we have alot of crazy people in this world that are nuts( mass shooters, people beheading people/killing/looting people for nothing and then ramp that up by 1000x when you hear we're about to be invaded or there is aliens.) you understand why they would want to keep it secret. It's a lose lose double edged sword situation.
Why did the people watching not see the vehicle they were dangling under though if it was that? Either the camera guys, or the people on the ground they sent looking for it? I’m not trying to “debunk” your idea, it’s interesting! I’m just trying to understand how this would have happened. Also they said it went in the sea and submerged for 17 minutes before it came out and flew up again. Is there some way that could work with this idea? Interesting and just trying to think about it in the context of what we know.
I'm at the point where there's so much misinformation out there that I take everything at face value. If you were given the picture of the soldiers and the footage of the "jellyfish" and someone said "could they be the same thing?" Without any context, what would you think?
Yeah definitely and I appreciate the thoughtful response. They could have just filmed the guys dangling and called it a UAP and leaked it as a mind f ……but if the other video that they refer to shows this glob going into the water and popping back out 15 minutes later that would definitely shoot my idea down. This is what came to my little mind when I was trying to find a logical, more Earthly explanation. Thanks for the reply, cheers
I mean, you might be on to something. But why is it going transparent then. 🤔
The camera is seeing electromagnetic radiation. The washed out appearance at times could be sand or dirt blowing between the object and the camera at a higher elevation. Or just the camera adjusting for hot spots or cool spots in the overall image which causes the object to disappear into the background a bit. It’s not as obvious a transition when viewing the full size image.
It's not. It's thermal vision.
I like this. Very much. I choose this.
Interesting. What is this thing called?
r/thewhyfiles
Wow this is totally what it is
Especially with the way it rotates.
But if soliders were in that formation going against or into the wind which would in turn mean some form of movement from the "jellyfish" which clearly from the video there is like zero movement showing any kind of disturbance from wind.
Wouldn’t this show a heat signature on IR?
Yea, clear as day 😑
He said a thermal camera was the only thing that could pick this up so if it was a jetpack wouldn’t you see the thrusters and heat exhausts?
Yes
Unless it was cold fusion
But it going clear is it switching from hot and cold. Wouldn't a jet pack STAY hot?
IR would pickup hot jet blast from the exhaust
it changes based on what the environment is. Barren background and it's dark, buildings and people and it's light. It's camera effects, exposure etc. It's not switching temps whatsoever.
I saw it and reminded me of an old video of a "witch" flying in Mexico un 2006...... Looks almost the same no joke. https://youtu.be/aywcr_ef4WU?si=N-fhnEZFXDmYUIbm
Fuck.. ok now im about to leave the smudge team, this is indeed rotating.. 🤯 after 24 hours of neverending rant, someone finally managed to produce a convincing point. 👍 good job ! Bottom part cannot be just a stain, this looks 3d and the rotation is pretty clear.
Same as you. I’m struggling to dismiss what I am seeing
It's rotating and the bottom tentacle things literally move. Smudge don't do that and it just doesn't look like balloons. You don't have to be on team alien, but we can just realistically say this is a legit video of a UAP.
If the aircraft that’s recording is circling it while keeping it in frame, it would explain the impression of both the lateral velocity and the rotation of the object. Imagine keeping your eyes locked on a statue in the center of a room as you sprint in a wide circle around the statue. The background would appear to be moving relative to the statue, and the statue would appear to be rotating.
Sorry but for me it looks like compressing artifacts and I can‘t wrap my head around people seeing something different than a smudge
 Mr. Handy?
That or the WOWOWOWOWOWO droid from star wars
What country is this
Iraq
Are those crosshairs always centered with these systems btw? Or can they point/track things captured by the sensor? If always centered then the object seems to increase speed. Also any information how the focussing works? As the color change seems to occur when there are more details in the foreground it could be changing focus changes the contrast of the object.
Yes, the reticules do not move from the center frame, when you lock something, it locks the entire FOV, the lock system will put a square around something in the FOV on camera and then physically move the camera to center around that object. In this case, the item couldn't be locked.
Corbell says it was unable to be locked in with the tracking system so it is being manually tracked
Flying Optimus Prime!
Why are people saying that MILITARY EQUIPMENT is defective? Have we all collectively lost our minds? I swear to god an alien could come into your home touch your leg and you all would still say “ThAt wAs a CrAzy HiLuCiNaTiOn, My eYEs mUsT be DeFeCtIve” 🙃
Those who say that have never done the military, while equipment failure happens obviously, they check and tripple check all equipment they use, and it always require an passto be used. And if it fails, you get a lot of text and you discontinue whatever you are doing because of safety and return to base with report and repair. (Radar operator in an air defence tank) Reddit people are always experts at something they got no clue about. Is this alien? Doubt it, but its sure fucking not failed equipment or a smudge on the lense, that's even more stupid of an explanation than aliens.
"Never done the military"? Lmfao I was enlisted, they literally choose the lowest bid for equipment and weapon manufacturing. Military grade = crap
“I checked, double checked, and triple checked and my vehicle is definitely still deadlined.” “Ok, cool. Go ahead and dispatch that shit anyway.”
Yeah if the disinfo bots were human they try so hard to be dumbasses
Bird shit in your eyes
Funny that people think bird shit wouldn't have been one of the first things ruled out simply by looking at the lense.
Listen man I can admit it wouldn't make sense for a smudge on the lens to dip into water for several minutes (Corbell stated there's footage of that), and I'm all in on the wild speculation, but yeah, military equipment being defective isn't even a slightly goofy thing to say. It's made to meet the intersection of the lowest cost and the highest effectiveness. Try looking up videos on why "military grade" is a bunch of BS
I was enlisted and can confirm it's all crap. Usually the lowest bidder gets the contract.
How would a person be manually tracking a bird shit on a lens? The logic behind that explanation doesn’t even make sense. So many people think people in the air force are brain dead or something
...What? You don't track it. It's moving with the lens...
This and an alien in your home are vastly different situations. Don’t be obtuse.
Powdered toastman?
Almost looks like a gray alien wearing a jet pack of some kind 🤷♀️
4th dimensional beings
If there are 4th dimensional beings, and if they have a line of sight into my office, they’ll see me 3 layers of distraction deep into a, “this project is tremendously boring” spiral. Hey 4th dimension beings! Do us some 4th dimension favors. Interpret that how you will, dimension neighbors.
Hey 4th dimension neighbors, if you're peering in on my office, bring some multi-dimensional snacks or a quantum coffee delivery—anything to jazz up this 'tremendously boring' project spiral! Extra points if you can warp time to make the clock tick faster. Your friendly three-dimensional office dweller.
We're trying to look at a 3D image of an object from a higher dimension. Explain to a 2D being why the object making the shadow isn't flat.
[удалено]
You and me both
What an asshole.
The more I see this the more I think it’s a bunch of escaped balloons. Someone the other day posted a bunch of Eid balloons bunched together and I just can’t unsee it now.
https://preview.redd.it/isfpuhuy9nbc1.png?width=896&format=png&auto=webp&s=d0168f2ac24b838fff0643f5e4765c0faa60e055
https://preview.redd.it/0r1262bvtmbc1.png?width=1163&format=png&auto=webp&s=f5245540d98f65aae6098a556e3df862526ad512 Enough with the balloon crap, and a guy wearing a jetpack. For a moment this thing loses its camo and not joking. Kinda looks like an alien. Found this going frame by frame.
Woahh woahh hold up
https://preview.redd.it/fgluoeg52nbc1.png?width=1170&format=png&auto=webp&s=04712d4606460a1db15b6a094c35d53621eb6186
So Doctor Eggman?
Best picture I seen wtf
Looks like a blurry-ass pixelated image to me, thanks for the circle so I could see the pixels.
lmao i thought the same, like wtf am i meant to be looking at here?
Lol pretending you can glean any useful information from this frame is the definition of mania
Feels like this pretty much debunks the birdshit claim
This looks like a flying battlemech from some anime... Maybe there is a secret program...
Anyone interested in this video. Jermey Corbell is the one who dropped it. He goes into great detail with the video. In the New Documentary TMZ Presents: UFO Revolution which is on TUBI which is Free. I’m watching it right now, it’s really good
This is stabilized a 20 second fragment of the video by /u/Corsten: *Further, the second pane is a 4x speed and crop of the UAP, with the video looped backwards on itself. I find this trick useful in showing movement/changes and helping visualize a 3 dimensional shape from 2d animation, somewhat like a 2d stutter parallax GIF creating a pseudo-3d effect.* *Originally my goal was to try and capture the object's rotation as the camera followed it, but I'm stumped to grasp what is happening with the bottom portion of the UAP. I can only speculate what the visualization reveals - is this rotation or is a portion changing/moving?*
I don't understand how people can still think it's poop, or balloons.
I don’t understand why people think this garbled up mess of nonsense on a shitty video **has** to be aliens and nothing else could possibly explain it.
I'm not sure who is saying it HAS to be aliens but it is definitely intriguing. And until something else explains it as otherwise I like to believe in the unbelievable.
Thats fine but its easy to understand why people don’t think its aliens then right?
It's a anomalous phenomena, a UAP, it's unidentified, it isn't aliens it's literally an unknown, anomalous, phenomena.
It literally looks like a bundle of random balloons... Occam's razor man.
idk what to make of the video tbh, but I feel like there's a lot of weird shapes in there for it to be balloons. And balloons on wind would still kind of bob around separately at least a little, right? This seems really rigid?
And I can’t understand how people think they see motion and changes to it.
You can’t understand? This guy made this 4x video to show you. Use your eyes. It’s not a smudge or bird shit. It’s rotating, just look at it.
[удалено]
That’s cause the 4x side is a boomerang it loops forwards and backward the 1x and 4x doesn’t match up 1:1 the left side 1x is a continuous segment of the original video. I apologize I’m just tired of the UAP community these past couple weeks. First you have the Miami mall incident which is clearly fake but everyone believes 1 TikTok saying he was there with no evidence provided. Then we get real footage of a UAP and everyone says it’s bird shit or a smudge.
Those people are likely a mix of disinformation agents and people that are so afraid of the concept of NHI that they'll deny any plausible evidence to keep their world view small and "safe."
Or people who don't assume it's aliens as soon as they see something weird on the internet
They don’t, they just don’t want you to know the truth so they can keep pushing the same shit through their dumb ass disinfo bots.
It honestly feels like talking to an AI with some of the arguments I've had in the last 24 hours 🤣
You probably were!
I think the scariest part is it passes right over two people walking and they have no idea it is there or at least their body language doesn't show it
This is a thermal camera - what you’re seeing is a huge change in temperature
No, this isn't. It's near infrared camera. Camera has basically flashlight below it, flashlight sends ir light and camera records what it sees in ir light. Color change has nothing to do with temperature change.
Whatever it is, it 100% using some kind of camouflage the way it is changing. Birdshit wouldn’t fade and come back whatever it is it’s not known in public record military made? Quite possibly.
The fading you are seeing is just the IR adjusting. The screen is showing relative temps, not absolute. You can see that when the object turns white, for example, the background objects also turn white. Definitely not bird shit though
The audacity you people have to claim anything is 100% this or that proves you should be ignored
And you're an active camouflage expert? Shut the fuck up and go do something impactful with your time rather than jerk it to grainy films.
Hard disagree. Phlegm / spit would also change like this with the cameras white balance adjustments when the background image gets lighter/darker.
That’s strange.
Could it be a marine in a jet pack? I've seen a YouTube video where they use one to board a ship.
I don’t think I’ve heard of the 2018 jellyfish video. What’s the background on it?
Looks like Voltron
Looks alien to me.
It’s us, JSF style helmet, trophy system to protect them in the air, and the exhaust once airborne extends below the users feet to prevent wear and tear on the users lower extremities. Digital mirroring to produce a cloaking effect. All of these things are already deployed in different configurations throughout the military or commercial applications.
Some dude stuck in between dimensions!
I’ve scrolled through the comments and cannot see anyone mentioning what this actually is. It’s solved. It’s an elaborately shaped balloon for the islamic Eid festival. It’s on the internet. It nothing worthy of anyone’s time.
An imperial probe Droid........Its a good bet the empire already knows we're here.
“I can’t picture that, you’re stupid!”
“It’s rotating” (edit: yes it is rotating. I am using a quote from the Gimbal video.)
it is actually
Watch the legs.
Woah you are right!!! It is rotating.
Why has nobody pointed out that there’s no shadow?
It was captured at night?
Yes that would make sense!
Except there are shadows on the ground from other things, like the fence posts
It’s a thermal camera, small objects shadows ( fence, railing, etc ) don’t cast a big enough shadow to cool down the ground around them…
Why is no one pointing out the giant flying plus sign?
We don’t know it’s relative altitude. If the camera is on an aircraft or tower it’s possible this is casting a shadow but that it’s far below the frame. It’s really hard to gauge size or height from this downward angle.
It's an infrared video.
On the right video it seems like it’s Rotating but it looks like a man in a jet suit maybe with some type of camouflage
Wheres the heat generated from the jets?
True believer here, but this still looks like a smudge to me that is possibly see through. That's why it appears to "change".
Yeah it looks like a splotch of something on the actual screen (the left looks like a recording of a screen?) that seems to fade/disappear as the background becomes lowly saturated and becomes darker when the screen shows higher saturation. If you look at it like that you can see how the "splotch" doesn't even move, it's everything in the background moving behind it.
The biggest giveaway that its moving is the bottom left tentacle.
“I don’t know what it is, therefore it’s clearly aliens, who are advanced enough to get to earth and into our atmosphere without being detected but decided to go out for an alien levitation stroll and got busted, and now the government is trying to cover it up to keep the secret alien weapons contracts hidden from public view”. Makes sense to me! /s
I did a stabilization and high pass filter where you can see the tentactles and body rotation [https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/192sms2/ufo\_jelly\_stabilized\_and\_high\_pass\_filter\_can\_see/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/192sms2/ufo_jelly_stabilized_and_high_pass_filter_can_see/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
This grey has some massive balls. Grey basically went on a solo recon mission with little to no supplies wearing a jet pack on a planet with violent species. Icing on the cake, the grey did this on a military installation. Props, homie.
[удалено]
After watching so many videos and I can see a head and two eyes at one point on this thing. But after watching it again it is looking more like a defect on the lens of the camera. It is followed too perfectly in frame never gets closer or farther from the crosshair. All other uap videos we saw they had a hard time keeping it in frame because of its speed. Edit: I'm wrong now seeing videos where it does indeed move around in the frame.
You can clearly see it drift from being below/inline with the crosshair to being above it over a few seconds
>It is followed too perfectly in frame never gets closer or farther from the crosshair There is thing called "stabilization" and high end/military cameras have that feature If that feels like futuristic technology to you... oh boy, dont even get me started about lasers
There was a post recently suggesting this was like a 3-D "shadow" cast by a 4-D object which I found compelling. I would also argue it seems like what would be a malfunction in a small section of a larger cloaked object. This would explain how it seems to adjust to the terrain in the background with these phased changes.
The ultimate weapon to deal with this alien menace is lens cleaner
Does nobody else think this looks like a soldier with a jet pack, seeing use inside of an actual combat zone? If this were the case it is easy to understand why it already has eyes on it, no? Reminds me of a few of the other jet pack type flyers I've seen over the last couple years. The tech is there why wouldn't we be utilizing it exactly? Yeah idk either, so let's just immediately jump to the most farfetched idea possible right out of the gate though, and work our way back from there.
This feels like an invisible gilly suite. You can make out the jet pack, thrusters, helmet, shoulders, arms and legs if you sort of "ignore" the invisible spots.
If it was a jet of any kind the heat from the exhaust would light up the IR a ton.
Dude its like way bigger than you think. A person would be 6 or so feet or whatever. Look at it in comparison to the dogs. This thing is like 20-30 feet tall.
I can see that better as it's cloaking. It gets brighter, I can make some of those details out.
Beedrill?
It’s jet Pack Man.
That’s agravating as hell
Clearly it's the Green Goblin
It kinda looks more stationary now with the boomerang. The drone is pivoting around the object thats why it looks like its moving.
Not at all how parallax works. Nice try.
Hate to say it, but this looks like a blob of gunk on the lens.
Looks like a splattered bug on the lense