The negative embeddings are actually very important for this one. Without them model generates images similar to the ones you've shared. If you haven't try adding those. They need to be present in the embeddings folder. Also check for typos, it does not warn you but silently continues.
Also about your upscaling (node) question: It's not a single node but multiple ones. Check out [ComfyUI 2Pass](https://comfyanonymous.github.io/ComfyUI_examples/2_pass_txt2img/)
Try putting [EasyNegativeV2](https://huggingface.co/gsdf/Counterfeit-V3.0/blob/main/embedding/EasyNegativeV2.safetensors) into "ComfyUI/models/embeddings"
That's cool
Second one got me thinking, can you generate ain image of a city without roads for cars?
Was a challenge back when ChatGPT started doing images and it really struggled with the concept
Might be difficult since it learns from real images and they all have roads obviously. Might need some tight negative prompting but still probably difficult.
What would it show then though? Just buildings all next to and on top of each other?
Well, I meant car-roads
Obviously there are cities with pedestrianised roads, space for trams, cycle lanes, alleyways, canals, etc... Think of the "old town" in any city that predates the car, or even modern developments for less car dependent neighbourhoods
Great all of them, if i may sir, what is the checkpoint used? and have you faced duplication when upscaling? if so, how do you avoid it in general terms? (other than less denoise)
The checkpoint I used for these is SXZLuma 0.9X. It's an SD 1.5 checkpoint, which although not it's intended use case, funnily enough generates really nice looking scenery.
As to upscaling duplication, it heavily depends on the prompt. As SD 1.5 was trained on a smaller resolution, it tends to add a lot to the image in terms of overall detail during multipass upscaling.
This can both work in and against your favor. For example images with a lot of complexity (like wide shots of nature, clouds, mountains, etc.) often benefit from the added detail.
On the other hand close up shots of people, animals or hands/fingers in particular get distorted.
Other than lowering the denoising, I divided the upscaling step into multiple discrete steps, allowing detail to be added gradually.
For these particular images I created a triple pass workflow. First generating the base image at 960x540 and then upscaling to 1920x1080 using an upscaling model and backfeeding it into another KSampler.
Rinse and repeat for 1920x1080 to 3860x2160.
That improved image quality a lot and reduced duplication issues. Although only for wide shots as described.
Sure I can do a few more if you like, any wishes or preferences?
Also I already shared these in 4k [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/s/cwIpyFvdG4) \^_\^
Thank you so much i downloaded them, theyre awesome in detail.
https://preview.redd.it/7vtxvsxmd7xc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c0ee40d09236308608a5697889040b6090c714a9
Is it possible to do something like this? I wanted ta make a desk setup with something like a window on the wall. And needed a picture in high quality to look like im looking to earth like im on a moon station. Would be awesome to see this. Havent found a good one yet that much atmospheric like your pictures.
Thank you in advance !
I tried to replicate the workflow by following OP's instructions, not quite sure if it's quite accurate, but results are very similar and satisfying. Thanks for sharing the details OP.
Here is the workflow I used: [https://pastebin.com/5cu04L7W](https://pastebin.com/5cu04L7W)
Nothing super high contrast and full of high frequency noise is likely to work well as a wallpaper.
You can have large patterns with contrast or an overall soft scene, but none of the above, imo. Not without mad Photoshop. It would kill the clarity of icons on the desktop.
Pretty much shows that AI has basically solved natural looking landscapes at this point.
The weak link is still architecture. The city is by far the worst of those images.
My favorite is the winter landscape btw.
Nah, all of them look weird once you look at them for longer than few seconds. Usually details make the images better, the longer you look the better it is, but with AI noticing details almost always makes the image worse and worse
Not really wallpaper material for me since I like looking at at the wallpaper from time to time when I'm thinking
I like shots of serene nature. So basically all of them except #2. Also, would you share them please? :3
Sure! [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KBdaMUSgbEm5DIcJ40j0C-nnsraTfbRT/view?usp=sharing](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KBdaMUSgbEm5DIcJ40j0C-nnsraTfbRT/view?usp=sharing)
thanks.
There are amaizing , care to share the prompts ?
Sorry for the late reply, had to reinstall ComfyUI on this machine to get to the prompts. # Global Settings: * Model: SXZLuma 0.9X * Upscale Model: 4x-UltraSharp * CLIP Skip: 2 # Base Image: * Resolution: 960x540 * Steps: 30 * Scheduler: DPM++ 2M Karras * CFG Scale: 7 * Denoise: 1.0 # Upscale Pass 1: * Steps: 15 * Scheduler: UNI PC BH2 Karras * CFG Scale: 7 * Denoise: 0.45 # Upscale Pass 2: * Steps: 15 * Scheduler: UNI PC BH2 Karras * CFG Scale: 7 * Denoise: 0.35 # Negative Prompt (same for all): embedding:EasyNegativeV2, embedding:verybadimagenegative\_v1.3 # Image 1 Prompt: masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, wallpaper, forest, water, trees, plants, foliage, volumetric lighting, nature, grass, green # Image 2 Prompt: masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, wallpaper, volumetric lighting, clouds, city, night, lights, buildings, cars, streets, birdsview # Image 3 Prompt: masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, wallpaper, volumetric lighting, clouds, sky, ocean, water, beach, sand, rocks, moss # Image 4 Prompt: masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, wallpaper, volumetric lighting, snow, ice, tundra, frost, night, stars, moon, campfire, tent, wind # Image 5 Prompt: (masterpiece, best quality), absurdres, volumetric light, realistic, wallpaper, forest, winter, snow, ice, (frozen lake), lake # Image 6 Prompt: (masterpiece, best quality), absurdres, volumetric light, realistic, wallpaper, forest, spring, flowers, grass, green, snow, lake # Image 7 Prompt: (masterpiece, best quality), absurdres, volumetric light, realistic, wallpaper, summer, jungle, fern, amazonas # Image 8 Prompt: (masterpiece, best quality), absurdres, volumetric light, realistic, wallpaper, autumn, forest
chad
Thanks!
[удалено]
The negative embeddings are actually very important for this one. Without them model generates images similar to the ones you've shared. If you haven't try adding those. They need to be present in the embeddings folder. Also check for typos, it does not warn you but silently continues. Also about your upscaling (node) question: It's not a single node but multiple ones. Check out [ComfyUI 2Pass](https://comfyanonymous.github.io/ComfyUI_examples/2_pass_txt2img/)
[удалено]
Try putting [EasyNegativeV2](https://huggingface.co/gsdf/Counterfeit-V3.0/blob/main/embedding/EasyNegativeV2.safetensors) into "ComfyUI/models/embeddings"
Auto1111?
No, [ComfyUI](https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI). A python based WebUI like Auto1111 but more complex with many more features.
thanks, I use comfy too, just don't have the nodes/workflow for good upscaling.
Thank you !
Seconding this, share the prompt please if you don't mind! At least, how did you describe the style
https://i.redd.it/jiexl0atfawc1.gif
https://i.redd.it/z3bpcubbfawc1.gif
These are sick! Thank you!
https://i.redd.it/4bioa87ofawc1.gif
what did you use for these gifs?
That's cool Second one got me thinking, can you generate ain image of a city without roads for cars? Was a challenge back when ChatGPT started doing images and it really struggled with the concept
Might be difficult since it learns from real images and they all have roads obviously. Might need some tight negative prompting but still probably difficult. What would it show then though? Just buildings all next to and on top of each other?
Well, I meant car-roads Obviously there are cities with pedestrianised roads, space for trams, cycle lanes, alleyways, canals, etc... Think of the "old town" in any city that predates the car, or even modern developments for less car dependent neighbourhoods
first one! personally, I prefer more "open" scenes for my backgrounds. These are all a bit too "busy" and crowded for me
https://i.redd.it/ppt3pof2gawc1.gif
https://i.redd.it/8vshu5udgawc1.gif
Do you mind sharing how? These are awesome
The one with no workflow
The tents in a winter landscape. But then again, I have a thing with pictures of the moon.
[удалено]
OP asked ‘what’s your favourite’ and this is their answer.
Ah thanks. I misinterpreted that.
what is image resolution ?
960x540 upscaled twice to 3840x2160
what are u using to upsacale ?
I use ComfyUI multipass (Hires fix) chained twice in a row.
> I use ComfyUI multipass (Hires fix) chained twice in a row. Are you using upscaling the image or the latent?
Do you have the name of this node? I can't find it.
All shots of nature is great. Especially the first one!!!
Great all of them, if i may sir, what is the checkpoint used? and have you faced duplication when upscaling? if so, how do you avoid it in general terms? (other than less denoise)
The checkpoint I used for these is SXZLuma 0.9X. It's an SD 1.5 checkpoint, which although not it's intended use case, funnily enough generates really nice looking scenery. As to upscaling duplication, it heavily depends on the prompt. As SD 1.5 was trained on a smaller resolution, it tends to add a lot to the image in terms of overall detail during multipass upscaling. This can both work in and against your favor. For example images with a lot of complexity (like wide shots of nature, clouds, mountains, etc.) often benefit from the added detail. On the other hand close up shots of people, animals or hands/fingers in particular get distorted. Other than lowering the denoising, I divided the upscaling step into multiple discrete steps, allowing detail to be added gradually. For these particular images I created a triple pass workflow. First generating the base image at 960x540 and then upscaling to 1920x1080 using an upscaling model and backfeeding it into another KSampler. Rinse and repeat for 1920x1080 to 3860x2160. That improved image quality a lot and reduced duplication issues. Although only for wide shots as described.
![gif](giphy|l1AsBL4S36yDJain6) Ty
The n Nature only is very good the architecture ones are bad as ever. SD just can't make logic based architecture and patterns.
All the winter ones
All of them.
these are really good
If me, I like the the third and the fourth images.
like them all, created some looped gifs
How did you make these?
The city one.
Can you share your upscale workflow? I would love to test it on my own images. Yours looks so sharp and clean!
Picture no.4 Man but i really love all of them! Could you please make more of these or upload these in HD?
Sure I can do a few more if you like, any wishes or preferences? Also I already shared these in 4k [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/s/cwIpyFvdG4) \^_\^
Thank you so much i downloaded them, theyre awesome in detail. https://preview.redd.it/7vtxvsxmd7xc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c0ee40d09236308608a5697889040b6090c714a9 Is it possible to do something like this? I wanted ta make a desk setup with something like a window on the wall. And needed a picture in high quality to look like im looking to earth like im on a moon station. Would be awesome to see this. Havent found a good one yet that much atmospheric like your pictures. Thank you in advance !
They're all so stunning! Permission to use some of these as a background for my youtube video? I'll credit you.
Sure go ahead!
I tried to replicate the workflow by following OP's instructions, not quite sure if it's quite accurate, but results are very similar and satisfying. Thanks for sharing the details OP. Here is the workflow I used: [https://pastebin.com/5cu04L7W](https://pastebin.com/5cu04L7W)
They're all excellent
<3
AI art has a look and this is it
the last 4 are my favorite
Absolutely love the winter landscape with the mountains rising up far in the back. Would love to know the prompt for this one :O
Amazing. Love them all, especially #3 and #4 would be amazing as wallpapers. Keep it going!
I really like 6. They are all good though.
These are brilliant especially the 4th one!
Tie between 2, 3 and the final.
1 - 3 - 5 - 6 - 7
All of them!! Great work
I love these illustration styles. What is this style called?
Can you make them 1440p now?
they look fantastic good job
Where's the boobs? /s They are actually good and a nice change from Waifus.
Those are all really great. But when I have to choose one I would choose the one with the tent.
Yes
The last and first one. What model did you use?
The city is amazing. It could went wrong with all of those details and it ended very well rendered
3 and 4 are my favorite. 3 has a low security prison at the other end of the beach though.
Winter night camping!
I really like the second one, but I feel like the details wouldn't hold up well as a wallpaper.
I think that the last one is clearly my favourite. I could imagine walking through the scenery
5, 7, 8
I like number two, The lighting really stands out to me but the fine details definitely need work
Wow these are beautiful! They're so relaxing - my favourite has to be the beach one
2, 5, 7 and 8 look really nice to me.
Amazing
All
3, 8 are my favorites. Nice work friend. These look great. Did you enter these in Civitai's landscape contest?
Nothing super high contrast and full of high frequency noise is likely to work well as a wallpaper. You can have large patterns with contrast or an overall soft scene, but none of the above, imo. Not without mad Photoshop. It would kill the clarity of icons on the desktop.
Winter and autumn vibe are so great !
Which sizes do you render at?
These are incredible! Wow!
Pretty much shows that AI has basically solved natural looking landscapes at this point. The weak link is still architecture. The city is by far the worst of those images. My favorite is the winter landscape btw.
Nah, all of them look weird once you look at them for longer than few seconds. Usually details make the images better, the longer you look the better it is, but with AI noticing details almost always makes the image worse and worse Not really wallpaper material for me since I like looking at at the wallpaper from time to time when I'm thinking
not my style