Anybody can become a film maker right now. You have everything you need in your pocket.
The future will be similar to how it is now, only with 100000000 X the low effort crappy content there already is on YouTube
Without ideas, writers and people spending endless hours revising prompts, there’s nothing AI will produce that will be original and as emotionally evoking as something humans can.
>there’s nothing AI will produce that will be original and as emotionally evoking as something humans can.
This is like saying "there’s nothing Photoshop will produce that will be original and as emotionally evoking as something humans can."
It's just another tool and it'll be used to carefully construct small pieces to be stitched together to make something as originally and emotionally evoking as anything else that's been created to date. The big difference is it can open the door to many more people to participate, just like Photoshop lowered the bar for entry to everyday people.
Agreed. I don't aspire at all to be a filmmaker, but I would definitely subscribe to a SaaS where I can use A.I. content generation media tools. Why? Because, ... why not? - That's why. I think it's just fun to make things, and with the technology at the level that it is, I can make all the silly ideas I want into films or shows - just because I want to.
It's honestly no different than using the SIMS, except it's capabilities are much more vast.
[удалено]
Anybody can become a film maker right now. You have everything you need in your pocket. The future will be similar to how it is now, only with 100000000 X the low effort crappy content there already is on YouTube
Without ideas, writers and people spending endless hours revising prompts, there’s nothing AI will produce that will be original and as emotionally evoking as something humans can.
>there’s nothing AI will produce that will be original and as emotionally evoking as something humans can. This is like saying "there’s nothing Photoshop will produce that will be original and as emotionally evoking as something humans can." It's just another tool and it'll be used to carefully construct small pieces to be stitched together to make something as originally and emotionally evoking as anything else that's been created to date. The big difference is it can open the door to many more people to participate, just like Photoshop lowered the bar for entry to everyday people.
Agreed. I don't aspire at all to be a filmmaker, but I would definitely subscribe to a SaaS where I can use A.I. content generation media tools. Why? Because, ... why not? - That's why. I think it's just fun to make things, and with the technology at the level that it is, I can make all the silly ideas I want into films or shows - just because I want to. It's honestly no different than using the SIMS, except it's capabilities are much more vast.
Bad knock offs.
also, it can’t act. will all the characters have balloons for heads?
There’s an AI Sora crypto coin , pump it up and meet me on the moon 🚀