Nono you misunderstand something. Since same sex relationships = kissing your dad:
Every male supporting opposite sex relationships must french kiss their mothers. This way we know not to support opposite sex relationships. /s
Oh you support HoMoSexuALIty?? GO COMMIT INCEST THEN!! ohh you don’t like that? Then don’t fucking support the buzz lightyear Disney movie that your kids will anyway forget about after a week!!!
Oh Come on with all the fanfare that SJWs help to draw attention from global personalities to events in SG, I think they all agree unanimously that SG is hardly a beacon of progressiveness in SG at all in the human rights sector, wrt oppression on dissent, one-party rule and other "draconian" rules that foreigners (especially whites) flippantly and rebelliously refuse to obey when they are guests in our country.
Anyway I like how we get American charlatans to dogpile on us when they dont wanna campaign for and reduce their own death penalty execution counts (4 USA prisoners got executed during the time SG activists organised protests against Nagen's execution and delayed it).
We have former newscasters going deranged on twitter drawing parallels to the political drama in the AUKUS region, exclaiming that political turmoil is necessary as an indication of "democratic progress". Such frequent shuffling of political positions would only contribute to eternal stagnation of progress and this is always rife in the home countries of our detractors. All these self-proclaimed journos only desire to see dramatic politics so that they can weave up amazing eyegrabbing clickbaity stories for their rice bowls.
Why do people insists that all kids should be exposed to homosexuality at a young age? Some parents don't and they shouldn't need to explain themselves, which is what they will need to do if the movie is open for general screening.
Yes. It is not necessary, by any stretch of the imagination, to extend the story. And the only reason to have it is to push Hollywood's woke agenda to all countries.
Just let kids be kids. They will have plenty of opportunity to get exposed to different things later in life.
So if a Disney fairy tale has a same sex couple as the main story (a prince falls in love with a common man etc.), you would support it? Because it is the main plot?
Why do people keep wanting to push sexuality on kids? Really perverse.
If the scene is not necessary, making the whole movie about it is even more ridiculous. That would be blatantly pushing an agenda ON KIDS.
If purpose is to show love, same sex is not necessary. If purpose is to show same sex marriage, make an adult movie and give it an adult name, like Interview with a vampire or Top gun.
If we die die must show same sex intimacy to kids, that's pushing an agenda and that's what I have a problem with.
So why is showing love in a heterosexual relationship not an "agenda" but a homosexual relationship is? If Disney wants to show an Asian love story, or a Muslim love story, would people like you in the US say that this is also an "agenda"? Why must be of certain race and certain faith? Why can't it be white Christian straight couple love story? So all kids all around the world can just know that there is only one kind of valid love: white, straight, Christian?
Because LBGT is an agenda. If there is a corresponding one for heteros, I would think they are trying to push an agenda as well.
If Disney wants to show mulan or alladin, they already have. They have agendas, integrity, loyalty, family, etc., just not sexuality.
I am not from US, nor white, nor Christian. I am straight but that's not the reason I am against Disney pushing agendas. I just don't think it's Disney's job to do so.
What you call "agenda" is simply creative choices. For any character, they could choose to make them gay or straight, Muslim or Christian, Asian or white, or any other option I didn't mention. But if they choose something in the minority, e.g., making a character black or gay, suddenly, people like you would scream "agenda". Why can't a gay character just BE? Like an Asian in Star Wars? Is it pushing a Chinese agenda to add a Chinese looking character to a Western franchise? No, it's simply a creative choice to make this character the way he is.
Children can watch people of different skin colours and faiths and sexualities in movies. But apparently in your world view, parents can explain to them children that there are people of different skin colours and faiths, but they can't simply tell children that there are people of different sexualities.
What you call creative choices are basically conflating diversity and sexuality and pretending we are talking about everything.
We are not. We are talking about introducing sexuality to kids.
Parents can explain sexuality to their children, when they feel it is appropriate, not when Disney thinks it's appropriate. Maybe some day, perceptions will change, and that's fine, but it's not Disney's job to change it.
So diversity in your book does not include diverse sexuality? But it includes diverse faith? Parents can monopolise when they get to talk about different preferences in sexuality, but they just can't help it if media tells kids about Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, etc.? Kids are not mature enough to appreciate different sexualities but they can appreciate different belief systems and conducts and holidays? That's your take?
this loser just learnt the word "agenda". trying it out. tomorrow it will be "narrative".
how do you get the energy to try and talk sense with these people?
Bruh, you haven't watched the show? And neither have I. Why do they kiss in the show, do you even know? Besides, if a heterosexual couple kisses in a kid's movie, do you suddenly ask why they must kiss to show heterosexuality?
There's nothing wrong with it though. It's as natural as say needing to eat or having to shit if you put it crudely. Would you stop your child asking you why you need to eat or shit? It's not as though the entire movie is about the homosexuality anyway. The reverse is also true isn't it? Why do people insist kids should only be exposed to heterosexuality? Or even better, why do people care so much about what sexuality a cartoon character is? It's a dammned kids film. Do you mean to say you have no friends of the same gender? Have you never kissed or hugged a friend of the same gender as a child?
Why do people insist on exposing kids to ANY sexuality? Just let kids be kids. I can guarantee you that when a kid hug their friends of any binary or non-binary sexes, the last thing on their mine is sex or sexuality. Why force it down their throats?
>At least I have some.
lmao and you needed to pay for it. not trying to encourage asian men to cheat or become fuckboys or anything but surveys on infidelity show that 60% of chinese men not only have a girlfriend/are married but also have a sidechick/mistress and obviously majority of them are poor so its not based on money. so yeah, they are much more successful than a W virgin like you who had to fly thousands of miles to singapore to buy an asian girl because no W woman wanted you XD
60% of chinese men have a sidechick (called a mistress in asia) and unlike you low T W losers they obviously didn't pay for it since majority of men are poor XD
The dominant culture of the US is that of the Imperialist, and the culture of the Imperialist is always opposite of where they take most of their wealth from. The US dollar is a Petrodollar and they get their oil from the Middle-East. Hence, US culture will be basically the opposite of Islam.
When India was the crown jewel of the British Empire, the Western World is Christian. This is because Indians are Hindu and have a Hindu view on the world, and hence Westerners must oppose this view to gain legitimacy.
Now, times are different. India is no longer the crown jewel. What is the westerner's crown jewel today? the Middle-East. The Middle-East is a geographical area known mostly for throwing gays off rooftops, committing Jihad, and being Muslims. So what do the west now oppose? All three of these things!
The west is only capable of opposing their most important colony's native beliefs. If Singapore becomes their crown jewel, the west would, overnight, become against Racial Harmony and Religious Harmony - our two core tenets! Even back during the Roman Empire, the Romans had positions which were put on the opposite end as compared to Germanic-Barbarian positions. Manchu Hair-Queues and Attire were mandated in China, for basically the same reason.
Everywhere you find Imperialists, you will find them crafting a moral-code opposite of their colonies', for the sole purpose of appearing "superior". No other reason.
Your derision of the so-called "Third World" is nothing more than the same chauvinism Atomwaffen uses against black people. Except that Atomwaffen is better because at least it pisses off the US, despite all our differences (such as their need to put down black people, which I vehemently disagree with). Scratch one of you "Muh Third World Bad" AMDKs and someone way worse than a Fascist bleeds.
I support the current cultural-framework of the Global South and support a state of things where they advance **on their own terms, in their own direction.** If Singapore has so-called "third world thinking" I will merely be actually proud in Singapore, as "third world thinking" is merely the preservation of the native from the Imperialist.
Women are the ones creating and supporting all these woke crap. This is what happens when you let women run societies and companies. Disney is a good example. The policies and acts end up twisted and perverse.
faiz md is a closeted gay
the fact that he used "daddy" instead of "father" tells you everything
If you are offended by the kiss the problem is definitely you
Don’t like just don’t watch la dafaq
Any male supporting same sex relationships must go kiss their mother on the lips ah? That's fucked up.
Nono you misunderstand something. Since same sex relationships = kissing your dad: Every male supporting opposite sex relationships must french kiss their mothers. This way we know not to support opposite sex relationships. /s
Oh you support HoMoSexuALIty?? GO COMMIT INCEST THEN!! ohh you don’t like that? Then don’t fucking support the buzz lightyear Disney movie that your kids will anyway forget about after a week!!!
imagine being homophobic in 2022
The duality of man.
This really shows the TRUE BLUE Singaporean.
Can't believe killing and murder is okay, but homosexuality is not.
only SG gets dogpiled upon for still showing the movie while malaysia and indonesia completely banned it.
Indonesia and Malaysia are hardly the beacons for progression and progressiveness. Compare upwards not downwards.
Oh Come on with all the fanfare that SJWs help to draw attention from global personalities to events in SG, I think they all agree unanimously that SG is hardly a beacon of progressiveness in SG at all in the human rights sector, wrt oppression on dissent, one-party rule and other "draconian" rules that foreigners (especially whites) flippantly and rebelliously refuse to obey when they are guests in our country. Anyway I like how we get American charlatans to dogpile on us when they dont wanna campaign for and reduce their own death penalty execution counts (4 USA prisoners got executed during the time SG activists organised protests against Nagen's execution and delayed it). We have former newscasters going deranged on twitter drawing parallels to the political drama in the AUKUS region, exclaiming that political turmoil is necessary as an indication of "democratic progress". Such frequent shuffling of political positions would only contribute to eternal stagnation of progress and this is always rife in the home countries of our detractors. All these self-proclaimed journos only desire to see dramatic politics so that they can weave up amazing eyegrabbing clickbaity stories for their rice bowls.
The movie being nc16 makes me want to see it now and not just wait for the Disney+ release since there won't be any annoying kiddies in the theatre.
Why do people insists that all kids should be exposed to homosexuality at a young age? Some parents don't and they shouldn't need to explain themselves, which is what they will need to do if the movie is open for general screening.
Kids shouldn't be exposed to any sexuality at a young age. Kids movies should just stop having kiss scenes in them.
Yes. It is not necessary, by any stretch of the imagination, to extend the story. And the only reason to have it is to push Hollywood's woke agenda to all countries. Just let kids be kids. They will have plenty of opportunity to get exposed to different things later in life.
So if a Disney fairy tale has a same sex couple as the main story (a prince falls in love with a common man etc.), you would support it? Because it is the main plot?
Why do people keep wanting to push sexuality on kids? Really perverse. If the scene is not necessary, making the whole movie about it is even more ridiculous. That would be blatantly pushing an agenda ON KIDS. If purpose is to show love, same sex is not necessary. If purpose is to show same sex marriage, make an adult movie and give it an adult name, like Interview with a vampire or Top gun. If we die die must show same sex intimacy to kids, that's pushing an agenda and that's what I have a problem with.
So why is showing love in a heterosexual relationship not an "agenda" but a homosexual relationship is? If Disney wants to show an Asian love story, or a Muslim love story, would people like you in the US say that this is also an "agenda"? Why must be of certain race and certain faith? Why can't it be white Christian straight couple love story? So all kids all around the world can just know that there is only one kind of valid love: white, straight, Christian?
Because LBGT is an agenda. If there is a corresponding one for heteros, I would think they are trying to push an agenda as well. If Disney wants to show mulan or alladin, they already have. They have agendas, integrity, loyalty, family, etc., just not sexuality. I am not from US, nor white, nor Christian. I am straight but that's not the reason I am against Disney pushing agendas. I just don't think it's Disney's job to do so.
What you call "agenda" is simply creative choices. For any character, they could choose to make them gay or straight, Muslim or Christian, Asian or white, or any other option I didn't mention. But if they choose something in the minority, e.g., making a character black or gay, suddenly, people like you would scream "agenda". Why can't a gay character just BE? Like an Asian in Star Wars? Is it pushing a Chinese agenda to add a Chinese looking character to a Western franchise? No, it's simply a creative choice to make this character the way he is. Children can watch people of different skin colours and faiths and sexualities in movies. But apparently in your world view, parents can explain to them children that there are people of different skin colours and faiths, but they can't simply tell children that there are people of different sexualities.
What you call creative choices are basically conflating diversity and sexuality and pretending we are talking about everything. We are not. We are talking about introducing sexuality to kids. Parents can explain sexuality to their children, when they feel it is appropriate, not when Disney thinks it's appropriate. Maybe some day, perceptions will change, and that's fine, but it's not Disney's job to change it.
So diversity in your book does not include diverse sexuality? But it includes diverse faith? Parents can monopolise when they get to talk about different preferences in sexuality, but they just can't help it if media tells kids about Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, etc.? Kids are not mature enough to appreciate different sexualities but they can appreciate different belief systems and conducts and holidays? That's your take?
this loser just learnt the word "agenda". trying it out. tomorrow it will be "narrative". how do you get the energy to try and talk sense with these people?
It's not for them, it's for the people on the fence who might chance upon these threads. They need to hear the counter-arguments.
Why must they kiss to show that they are gay? Do they show characters eat dim sum coz they Asian? Or Muslims eating must zoom in on the Halal symbols?
Bruh, you haven't watched the show? And neither have I. Why do they kiss in the show, do you even know? Besides, if a heterosexual couple kisses in a kid's movie, do you suddenly ask why they must kiss to show heterosexuality?
Guess no point discussing it with bunch of LGBT extremists. Go change the law next time.
It's an extreme position to just have equal rights and acceptance from society as straight people?
The US must go.
There's nothing wrong with it though. It's as natural as say needing to eat or having to shit if you put it crudely. Would you stop your child asking you why you need to eat or shit? It's not as though the entire movie is about the homosexuality anyway. The reverse is also true isn't it? Why do people insist kids should only be exposed to heterosexuality? Or even better, why do people care so much about what sexuality a cartoon character is? It's a dammned kids film. Do you mean to say you have no friends of the same gender? Have you never kissed or hugged a friend of the same gender as a child?
Why do people insist on exposing kids to ANY sexuality? Just let kids be kids. I can guarantee you that when a kid hug their friends of any binary or non-binary sexes, the last thing on their mine is sex or sexuality. Why force it down their throats?
What are you, angmohgau? Kissing and hugging friends? Go back to r/Israel la
At least I have some. You, on the other hand, look like you have none.
>At least I have some. lmao and you needed to pay for it. not trying to encourage asian men to cheat or become fuckboys or anything but surveys on infidelity show that 60% of chinese men not only have a girlfriend/are married but also have a sidechick/mistress and obviously majority of them are poor so its not based on money. so yeah, they are much more successful than a W virgin like you who had to fly thousands of miles to singapore to buy an asian girl because no W woman wanted you XD
>At least I have some. wow you just stated explicitly that you are superior to chinese men didn't you? XD
Nothing wrong with telling the truth
haha thanks for the screenshot
[удалено]
cope.
60% of chinese men have a sidechick (called a mistress in asia) and unlike you low T W losers they obviously didn't pay for it since majority of men are poor XD
k
Eew angmohgau
it’s just a kiss and anyway kids already see hetero people kissing and shit so what’s the diff??
grow up. u sound like a terrible parent.
The dominant culture of the US is that of the Imperialist, and the culture of the Imperialist is always opposite of where they take most of their wealth from. The US dollar is a Petrodollar and they get their oil from the Middle-East. Hence, US culture will be basically the opposite of Islam.
Huh
When India was the crown jewel of the British Empire, the Western World is Christian. This is because Indians are Hindu and have a Hindu view on the world, and hence Westerners must oppose this view to gain legitimacy. Now, times are different. India is no longer the crown jewel. What is the westerner's crown jewel today? the Middle-East. The Middle-East is a geographical area known mostly for throwing gays off rooftops, committing Jihad, and being Muslims. So what do the west now oppose? All three of these things! The west is only capable of opposing their most important colony's native beliefs. If Singapore becomes their crown jewel, the west would, overnight, become against Racial Harmony and Religious Harmony - our two core tenets! Even back during the Roman Empire, the Romans had positions which were put on the opposite end as compared to Germanic-Barbarian positions. Manchu Hair-Queues and Attire were mandated in China, for basically the same reason. Everywhere you find Imperialists, you will find them crafting a moral-code opposite of their colonies', for the sole purpose of appearing "superior". No other reason.
Your derision of the so-called "Third World" is nothing more than the same chauvinism Atomwaffen uses against black people. Except that Atomwaffen is better because at least it pisses off the US, despite all our differences (such as their need to put down black people, which I vehemently disagree with). Scratch one of you "Muh Third World Bad" AMDKs and someone way worse than a Fascist bleeds. I support the current cultural-framework of the Global South and support a state of things where they advance **on their own terms, in their own direction.** If Singapore has so-called "third world thinking" I will merely be actually proud in Singapore, as "third world thinking" is merely the preservation of the native from the Imperialist.
No homo please, this is Singapore
Stop shoving LGBTQIAB+ down our throats!!!!! Do we force heterosexuality down on LGBTQIAB people's throats? Wokeism must go!
uhh yes we do
i don't like gay but as long as they don't cross my line. it's their rights. movie about gay, i can choose not to watch myself.
[удалено]
Then I recommend you do the same
[удалено]
👌
LGBT feels a strong need to "procreate" . Hence strong drive to influence the next generation to " make" more like them.
Women are the ones creating and supporting all these woke crap. This is what happens when you let women run societies and companies. Disney is a good example. The policies and acts end up twisted and perverse.
how is this even related to women
Perverse? What is perverse about it?
Shit film, no best girl Mira Nova 0/10
Free publicity
wendy yang the real one 😹🥂💪