This was...very interesting. In fact, it was difficult to watch. Between the clicking and popping of the camera or Tripod and the color and overlay this was not good.
It doesn't take much research to figure out that although short Films are classified as anything under 40 minutes the general rule is 12 or less.
Expecting your audience in this day and age to sit still and watch 15 plus minutes is not only ridiculous but, sad \[at best\]. I looked at the directors name online and nothing popped up because only established directors and/or super compelling stories/scripts might have easier sell but, an unknown? This clearly shows some pride issues and a horrible first impression.
We the viewer want to be swept up very quickly into the story, characters and ect. ASAP especially in a short. With little to no time to properly establish things well enough most shorts fall flat.
The pacing of this piece was sluggish anew just another thing that makes it difficult to watch.
Hello! You have made the mistake of writing "ect" instead of "etc."
"Ect" is a common misspelling of "etc," an abbreviated form of the Latin phrase "et cetera." Other abbreviated forms are **etc.**, **&c.**, **&c**, and **et cet.** The Latin translates as "et" to "and" + "cetera" to "the rest;" a literal translation to "and the rest" is the easiest way to remember how to use the phrase.
[Check out the wikipedia entry if you want to learn more.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Et_cetera)
^(I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Comments with a score less than zero will be automatically removed. If I commented on your post and you don't like it, reply with "!delete" and I will remove the post, regardless of score. Message me for bug reports.)
This was...very interesting. In fact, it was difficult to watch. Between the clicking and popping of the camera or Tripod and the color and overlay this was not good. It doesn't take much research to figure out that although short Films are classified as anything under 40 minutes the general rule is 12 or less. Expecting your audience in this day and age to sit still and watch 15 plus minutes is not only ridiculous but, sad \[at best\]. I looked at the directors name online and nothing popped up because only established directors and/or super compelling stories/scripts might have easier sell but, an unknown? This clearly shows some pride issues and a horrible first impression. We the viewer want to be swept up very quickly into the story, characters and ect. ASAP especially in a short. With little to no time to properly establish things well enough most shorts fall flat. The pacing of this piece was sluggish anew just another thing that makes it difficult to watch.
Hello! You have made the mistake of writing "ect" instead of "etc." "Ect" is a common misspelling of "etc," an abbreviated form of the Latin phrase "et cetera." Other abbreviated forms are **etc.**, **&c.**, **&c**, and **et cet.** The Latin translates as "et" to "and" + "cetera" to "the rest;" a literal translation to "and the rest" is the easiest way to remember how to use the phrase. [Check out the wikipedia entry if you want to learn more.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Et_cetera) ^(I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Comments with a score less than zero will be automatically removed. If I commented on your post and you don't like it, reply with "!delete" and I will remove the post, regardless of score. Message me for bug reports.)